From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig ( talk) 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Arnolds Krūkliņš (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks WP:SIGCOV in multiple, reliable and independent sources and thus fails WP:GNG. The subject also fails WP:NOLYMPICS in that he did not win a medal. In this case, Krūkliņš not only didn't medal -- he was disqualified from the event. See Athletics at the 1936 Summer Olympics – Men's 50 kilometres walk. Cbl62 ( talk) 12:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Noise
*Comment It's clear that Cbl62 is acting as a proxy for Lambert to log AfDs, due to Lambert's AfD restrictions, something that Lambert has been warned not to do very recently. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The notion that I am a "proxy" for JPL is absurd. I've historically disagreed with JPL far more often than not at AfD. Indeed, just last year, I took JPL to ANI over his AfD nominations. This contention is pure smoke and mirrors to avoid focusing on an AfD that is clearly meritorious. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Rubbish. Lambert adds to his blog, sorry talkpage, about the notability of a subject, and then you send it to AfD. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Shame on you for making such baseless claims in desperate defense of your insupportable sub-stub. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The links above show that it is the case that I've stated. Unless, of course, you didn't post on Lambert's talkpage about this article and its AfD. Oh, wait. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Nope. JPL posted about another one of your insupportable Olympic sub-stubs which led me to Krūkliņš which I independently reviewed and found to be sorely and completely lacking. ... Curious whether you have anything to say about the substance of the AfD. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Yes. The discussion with you on Lambert's talkpage show this. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Still no comment on the substance of the AfD? Any SIGCOV to present showing that Krūkliņš passes GNG? Cbl62 ( talk) 13:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig ( talk) 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Arnolds Krūkliņš (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject lacks WP:SIGCOV in multiple, reliable and independent sources and thus fails WP:GNG. The subject also fails WP:NOLYMPICS in that he did not win a medal. In this case, Krūkliņš not only didn't medal -- he was disqualified from the event. See Athletics at the 1936 Summer Olympics – Men's 50 kilometres walk. Cbl62 ( talk) 12:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Noise
*Comment It's clear that Cbl62 is acting as a proxy for Lambert to log AfDs, due to Lambert's AfD restrictions, something that Lambert has been warned not to do very recently. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:20, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The notion that I am a "proxy" for JPL is absurd. I've historically disagreed with JPL far more often than not at AfD. Indeed, just last year, I took JPL to ANI over his AfD nominations. This contention is pure smoke and mirrors to avoid focusing on an AfD that is clearly meritorious. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Rubbish. Lambert adds to his blog, sorry talkpage, about the notability of a subject, and then you send it to AfD. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Shame on you for making such baseless claims in desperate defense of your insupportable sub-stub. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:32, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The links above show that it is the case that I've stated. Unless, of course, you didn't post on Lambert's talkpage about this article and its AfD. Oh, wait. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Nope. JPL posted about another one of your insupportable Olympic sub-stubs which led me to Krūkliņš which I independently reviewed and found to be sorely and completely lacking. ... Curious whether you have anything to say about the substance of the AfD. Cbl62 ( talk) 13:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Yes. The discussion with you on Lambert's talkpage show this. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:43, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
Still no comment on the substance of the AfD? Any SIGCOV to present showing that Krūkliņš passes GNG? Cbl62 ( talk) 13:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook