The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Clearly No consensus between those who believe
WP:SIGCOV is now met through new sources and those editors who don't. I don't think relisting this discussion would resolve this difference of opinion on this article. LizRead!Talk!04:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Article is unsourced and I couldn't find any coverage. Article was under PROD which was removed then readded by
User:Anachronist who claims to have found sources and may have an argument for
WP:DRAFTIFY. I didn't see any coverage so I'm personally leaning toward delete, but I'd like to hear them out first. Also pinging
User:UtherSRG who initiated the PROD.
QuietHere (
talk)
04:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
And a note for anyone searching that there are more results to be found under "Alice DiMicele" spelling. Page was recently moved from that spelling to the current one without discussion which I suspect might've been the wrong move just based on sheer number of results on Google and the Wayback Machine.
QuietHere (
talk)
04:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
According to her own website, the spelling is "Di Micele" (with space), but the Internet often removes the space, leading to both versions being visible in search results. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
my name on drivers license is spelled Di Micele for the record. I had know idea what a huge pain it would be for me... I might have used a stage name had I know this 35 years ago... but here we are and I'm still doing my thing.
Alicedimicele (
talk)
22:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Soft delete or draftify - I originally removed the prod and created this AFD page, which I subsequently deleted after I actually did find sources, and then I reverted my edit that had replaced the prod with the AFD tag in the article, which had the effect of restoring the prod. Plenty of newspaper sources here:
https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Alice+Di+Micele%22&tbs=bkt:s&tbm=bks - although many of them are just announcements with a smattering of pieces giving significant coverage. Therefore, while I think the article is abysmal and qualifies for speedy deletion in its current state because it makes no credible assertion of significance, cites no independent sources, and fails to demonstrate any inclusion criterion in
WP:MUSICBIO, I am no longer convinced that the subject isn't notable because independent coverage does exist. I wouldn't object to draftification. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
05:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
That list did provide
this piece which is solid coverage, but that's it. There was one festival review where she got one sentence of praise, but otherwise it's all concert announcements without any prose about the subject. I'm still leaning on delete; not much point in draftifying without knowing there's enough coverage to actually save the article 'cause it won't pass notability in draft reviews.
QuietHere (
talk)
09:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - She's been around for a long time and seems to get a lot of gigs, because newspaper announcements of her local appearances are pretty prevalent. However, I can find very little substantial coverage of her career of the type that can build an encyclopedic article. She gets some minor coverage like this album review:
[1], and this biographical intro:
[2]. Unfortunately I can't find anything truly
reliable and significant. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment - I PROD'd, because it was tagged as Speedy, but I couldn't justify under the CSD guidelines. I'm surprised this article has lasted for so many years without a deletion discussion. I'm leaning towards delete, though draftify would be a good option. I'm also the user who moved it to its current placement, based off of the edits on the topic's name and the edit comments about that (which cite the artist's own website). -
UtherSRG(talk)15:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The overall lack of coverage, relatively obscure starting point and external references build a decent-enough case as things currently stand, but what really stands out to me is the lack of any holistic significance that would be beneficial in an encyclopedic format. Regardless of whether garnering attention plays into any of the already-noted sources, the sheer fact that most pieces are mere announcements of the subject's existence - nothing more, nothing less, and certainly nothing of use apart from compiling a loose list of appearances - justify the negligibility of the page's creation in the first place. Without any significant value as a page, there's no legitiamte reason I can find to justify its existence, either in the past or in the future. ^^ Anyone else?
TheMysteriousShadeheart (
talk)
19:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
If there was coverage discussing all those things then it would be a lot easier to be convinced, but I don't think we can take any artist at their word alone for notability because we'd still have an unsourced article just full of even more unsourced claims directly from the artist (which I assume would still be a COI violation).
QuietHere (
talk)
04:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
I know my other albums also charted on these and on an Americana chart. Is this enough or do I need to keep searching for more?
Awards: my 2013 album If I Were An Otter: Songs for Kids of All Ages received a Parents Choice Award. I have the physical award, but I can't find it online. I could upload if that would help. That album is in many libraries across the US and the title track has over 300k streams on spotify and my songs are on over 300 playlists on spotify including editorial, algorithmic and user playlists. Here's a review in No Depression of that album:
https://www.nodepression.com/great-kids-music-heidi-swedberg-alice-dimicele-the-banjo-and-putumayo-americana/
a few of the reviews for the new album (most are from Europe):
West Coast Live is a syndicated live radio show out of the Bay Area. I played on October 18th 2008 on the same show with Sarah Vowell & Van Jones. It is distributed all over the US on many radio stations. Here is the archived version:
https://wcl.org/past-programs-2008
The Jefferson Monthly is a magazine put out by Jefferson Public Radio the premiere radio station of my region where I get lots of airplay. The listenership spans from south of Eugene Oregon to Mendocino county in California. It's the largest area radio station that I know of. This contains a review/article on page 41 that talks about my significance in the Southern Oregon music scene:
https://issuu.com/wpdigitalpublications/docs/jefferson_at_trim_sizeAlicedimicele (
talk)
21:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - I'll be working on improving the citations and references for this page throughout the month of October. Folk music is a niche which means the typical Google searches won't be helpful (as noted by others above). I have knowledge of the folk music genre and have had better luck finding appropriate sources and will help improve this entry. I will work with the sources
Alicedimicele has provided as well. I hope other editors will keep in mind that notability within the folk genre will have different sources and references than, say, a commercial pop star. Thank you.
Jfricker (
talk)
14:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep this entry for Alice Di Micele and kindly remove all deficiency claims. As a professor of sociology I have addressed all standing problems, added legitimate citations, and categorized this composer and songwriter also as an activist. As such, Wiki should not use mere “musician” characteristics for quality control, but also consider Alice’s work as a philanthropist and community organizer. As these categories do not leave behind extensive online evidence, the data driven changes I made for this musician /sociomusicologist have exceeded the criteria for permanent wiki inclusion. Thank you, in advance, for considering and accepting my edits and reversing deletion for this entry. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Lisiunia (
talk •
contribs) 02:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Copied from
Special:PermaLink/1115960069 on talk page.
Primefac (
talk)
09:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Clearly No consensus between those who believe
WP:SIGCOV is now met through new sources and those editors who don't. I don't think relisting this discussion would resolve this difference of opinion on this article. LizRead!Talk!04:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Article is unsourced and I couldn't find any coverage. Article was under PROD which was removed then readded by
User:Anachronist who claims to have found sources and may have an argument for
WP:DRAFTIFY. I didn't see any coverage so I'm personally leaning toward delete, but I'd like to hear them out first. Also pinging
User:UtherSRG who initiated the PROD.
QuietHere (
talk)
04:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
And a note for anyone searching that there are more results to be found under "Alice DiMicele" spelling. Page was recently moved from that spelling to the current one without discussion which I suspect might've been the wrong move just based on sheer number of results on Google and the Wayback Machine.
QuietHere (
talk)
04:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
According to her own website, the spelling is "Di Micele" (with space), but the Internet often removes the space, leading to both versions being visible in search results. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
my name on drivers license is spelled Di Micele for the record. I had know idea what a huge pain it would be for me... I might have used a stage name had I know this 35 years ago... but here we are and I'm still doing my thing.
Alicedimicele (
talk)
22:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Soft delete or draftify - I originally removed the prod and created this AFD page, which I subsequently deleted after I actually did find sources, and then I reverted my edit that had replaced the prod with the AFD tag in the article, which had the effect of restoring the prod. Plenty of newspaper sources here:
https://www.google.com/search?&q=%22Alice+Di+Micele%22&tbs=bkt:s&tbm=bks - although many of them are just announcements with a smattering of pieces giving significant coverage. Therefore, while I think the article is abysmal and qualifies for speedy deletion in its current state because it makes no credible assertion of significance, cites no independent sources, and fails to demonstrate any inclusion criterion in
WP:MUSICBIO, I am no longer convinced that the subject isn't notable because independent coverage does exist. I wouldn't object to draftification. ~
Anachronist (
talk)
05:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
That list did provide
this piece which is solid coverage, but that's it. There was one festival review where she got one sentence of praise, but otherwise it's all concert announcements without any prose about the subject. I'm still leaning on delete; not much point in draftifying without knowing there's enough coverage to actually save the article 'cause it won't pass notability in draft reviews.
QuietHere (
talk)
09:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - She's been around for a long time and seems to get a lot of gigs, because newspaper announcements of her local appearances are pretty prevalent. However, I can find very little substantial coverage of her career of the type that can build an encyclopedic article. She gets some minor coverage like this album review:
[1], and this biographical intro:
[2]. Unfortunately I can't find anything truly
reliable and significant. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
TALK|
CONTRIBS) 14:24, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment - I PROD'd, because it was tagged as Speedy, but I couldn't justify under the CSD guidelines. I'm surprised this article has lasted for so many years without a deletion discussion. I'm leaning towards delete, though draftify would be a good option. I'm also the user who moved it to its current placement, based off of the edits on the topic's name and the edit comments about that (which cite the artist's own website). -
UtherSRG(talk)15:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The overall lack of coverage, relatively obscure starting point and external references build a decent-enough case as things currently stand, but what really stands out to me is the lack of any holistic significance that would be beneficial in an encyclopedic format. Regardless of whether garnering attention plays into any of the already-noted sources, the sheer fact that most pieces are mere announcements of the subject's existence - nothing more, nothing less, and certainly nothing of use apart from compiling a loose list of appearances - justify the negligibility of the page's creation in the first place. Without any significant value as a page, there's no legitiamte reason I can find to justify its existence, either in the past or in the future. ^^ Anyone else?
TheMysteriousShadeheart (
talk)
19:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)reply
If there was coverage discussing all those things then it would be a lot easier to be convinced, but I don't think we can take any artist at their word alone for notability because we'd still have an unsourced article just full of even more unsourced claims directly from the artist (which I assume would still be a COI violation).
QuietHere (
talk)
04:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
I know my other albums also charted on these and on an Americana chart. Is this enough or do I need to keep searching for more?
Awards: my 2013 album If I Were An Otter: Songs for Kids of All Ages received a Parents Choice Award. I have the physical award, but I can't find it online. I could upload if that would help. That album is in many libraries across the US and the title track has over 300k streams on spotify and my songs are on over 300 playlists on spotify including editorial, algorithmic and user playlists. Here's a review in No Depression of that album:
https://www.nodepression.com/great-kids-music-heidi-swedberg-alice-dimicele-the-banjo-and-putumayo-americana/
a few of the reviews for the new album (most are from Europe):
West Coast Live is a syndicated live radio show out of the Bay Area. I played on October 18th 2008 on the same show with Sarah Vowell & Van Jones. It is distributed all over the US on many radio stations. Here is the archived version:
https://wcl.org/past-programs-2008
The Jefferson Monthly is a magazine put out by Jefferson Public Radio the premiere radio station of my region where I get lots of airplay. The listenership spans from south of Eugene Oregon to Mendocino county in California. It's the largest area radio station that I know of. This contains a review/article on page 41 that talks about my significance in the Southern Oregon music scene:
https://issuu.com/wpdigitalpublications/docs/jefferson_at_trim_sizeAlicedimicele (
talk)
21:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - I'll be working on improving the citations and references for this page throughout the month of October. Folk music is a niche which means the typical Google searches won't be helpful (as noted by others above). I have knowledge of the folk music genre and have had better luck finding appropriate sources and will help improve this entry. I will work with the sources
Alicedimicele has provided as well. I hope other editors will keep in mind that notability within the folk genre will have different sources and references than, say, a commercial pop star. Thank you.
Jfricker (
talk)
14:05, 12 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep this entry for Alice Di Micele and kindly remove all deficiency claims. As a professor of sociology I have addressed all standing problems, added legitimate citations, and categorized this composer and songwriter also as an activist. As such, Wiki should not use mere “musician” characteristics for quality control, but also consider Alice’s work as a philanthropist and community organizer. As these categories do not leave behind extensive online evidence, the data driven changes I made for this musician /sociomusicologist have exceeded the criteria for permanent wiki inclusion. Thank you, in advance, for considering and accepting my edits and reversing deletion for this entry. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Lisiunia (
talk •
contribs) 02:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC) Copied from
Special:PermaLink/1115960069 on talk page.
Primefac (
talk)
09:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.