The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Single page American Football article, of which run from 1899 to 2016, and each one has a single page. Requesting delete and amalgamation, of first 50, which only in each is coach, year and Standings changed. It could easily merged into decades. Side effect is many dozens of these articles needing reviewed, with substantially little difference between them. Little knowledge can easily be amalgamated into single table per decade, or per 20 year block. Took page at random for WP:AFD.
scope_creep (
talk)
01:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Season articles for major teams generate sufficient coverage to pass
WP:GNG. IMO there ought to be a presumption of notability for seasons involving a Power 5 Conference team. Washington State is such a major team with membership in a Power 5 Conference.
Cbl62 (
talk)
03:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep College football, including the history and seasons of its major teams (such as Washington State), is an incredibly well-covered sport.
Deletion is not cleanup, and we definitely shouldn't be deleting pages just to reduce a backlog (especially when autopatrolled status is an option).
TheCatalyst31Reaction•
Creation03:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment I know American Football is notable on WP. I'm not looking to delete the information, nor reformat it into a form which makes it harder to read or create, nor to alter any table or other salient information in any manner. I merely think that if two pages have only 12 characters of difference, in the first two articles I looked at across at
1919 Colorado Silver and Gold football team, they should be combined, perhaps per a decade block, or a period that is more natural to American Football. 13:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Single page American Football article, of which run from 1899 to 2016, and each one has a single page. Requesting delete and amalgamation, of first 50, which only in each is coach, year and Standings changed. It could easily merged into decades. Side effect is many dozens of these articles needing reviewed, with substantially little difference between them. Little knowledge can easily be amalgamated into single table per decade, or per 20 year block. Took page at random for WP:AFD.
scope_creep (
talk)
01:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Season articles for major teams generate sufficient coverage to pass
WP:GNG. IMO there ought to be a presumption of notability for seasons involving a Power 5 Conference team. Washington State is such a major team with membership in a Power 5 Conference.
Cbl62 (
talk)
03:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep College football, including the history and seasons of its major teams (such as Washington State), is an incredibly well-covered sport.
Deletion is not cleanup, and we definitely shouldn't be deleting pages just to reduce a backlog (especially when autopatrolled status is an option).
TheCatalyst31Reaction•
Creation03:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment I know American Football is notable on WP. I'm not looking to delete the information, nor reformat it into a form which makes it harder to read or create, nor to alter any table or other salient information in any manner. I merely think that if two pages have only 12 characters of difference, in the first two articles I looked at across at
1919 Colorado Silver and Gold football team, they should be combined, perhaps per a decade block, or a period that is more natural to American Football. 13:27, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.