Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Verify references! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christchurch mosque shootings. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I appreciate your edits, but don't let me ever see you use the word that you used in this edit summary. Drmies ( talk) 16:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
apologies for using colloquial language. Verify references ( talk) 16:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
for other users reference, I called the perpetrator of the christchurch mosque shootings, a Retard (pejorative) in the edit comment which i didnt think anyone would consider to be especially offensive. Verify references ( talk) 16:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
You asked your question at the wrong place, so I removed it from there, but to answer your question: if you believe your warning is unfair, it is best to contact the person that warned you directly via their talk page. MrClog ( talk) 18:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AbdelFattah Rahhaoui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AbdelFattah Rahhaoui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:HIGHMAINT, please don't retire or throw a bunch of drama about retiring, just to suddenly return. Retiring is a very serious thing, and if you are making edits while retired it can look suspicious, like your account has been hacked. If you are going to return to the project, please remove the retired template from your user page, and think carefully before re-adding it. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 01:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is bad faith closure of topic. I'm notifying you are I'm unsure if you are the one who re-opened the discussion so there is a risk you may have decided to drop the issue and are no longer following it. (And pings aren't considered sufficient notification for ANI since they can fail or be disabled etc.) Nil Einne ( talk) 05:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)The article Inorganic Being has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Confusingly written, not supported by reliable sources. While the phrase "inorganic being" has some use in academic literature, its usage here is completely unrelated to what I've been able to find in RS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. signed,
Rosguill
talk 21:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma and Lila Lévy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma and Lila Lévy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Viztor ( talk) 19:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:35, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Verify references! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christchurch mosque shootings. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I appreciate your edits, but don't let me ever see you use the word that you used in this edit summary. Drmies ( talk) 16:08, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
apologies for using colloquial language. Verify references ( talk) 16:14, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
for other users reference, I called the perpetrator of the christchurch mosque shootings, a Retard (pejorative) in the edit comment which i didnt think anyone would consider to be especially offensive. Verify references ( talk) 16:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
You asked your question at the wrong place, so I removed it from there, but to answer your question: if you believe your warning is unfair, it is best to contact the person that warned you directly via their talk page. MrClog ( talk) 18:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AbdelFattah Rahhaoui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AbdelFattah Rahhaoui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liz Read! Talk! 01:36, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Per WP:HIGHMAINT, please don't retire or throw a bunch of drama about retiring, just to suddenly return. Retiring is a very serious thing, and if you are making edits while retired it can look suspicious, like your account has been hacked. If you are going to return to the project, please remove the retired template from your user page, and think carefully before re-adding it. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 01:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is bad faith closure of topic. I'm notifying you are I'm unsure if you are the one who re-opened the discussion so there is a risk you may have decided to drop the issue and are no longer following it. (And pings aren't considered sufficient notification for ANI since they can fail or be disabled etc.) Nil Einne ( talk) 05:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Acroterion
(talk) 12:42, 30 March 2019 (UTC)The article Inorganic Being has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Confusingly written, not supported by reliable sources. While the phrase "inorganic being" has some use in academic literature, its usage here is completely unrelated to what I've been able to find in RS.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. signed,
Rosguill
talk 21:27, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alma and Lila Lévy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma and Lila Lévy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Viztor ( talk) 19:31, 9 June 2019 (UTC)