Hello. I have received your email, where you inquired about whether your topic ban prohibits you from making edits to Soviet famine of 1946–1947 in Ukraine. In the interest of transparency, and so other administrators can see this clarifying statement, I am responding here rather than by e-mail.
In short, your topic ban does not per se cover this subject wholly. If any edit you make adds content involving the ethnic identity of particular individuals where it is disputed whether their ethnicity is Ukrainian, or adds content relating to disputes between the countries of Russia and Ukraine, then your edit is prohibited.
I am generally not too familiar with the historiography of the 1946-47 famine in the Ukraine, but if it is anything like that of the Holodomor I would strongly advise you to avoid making edits there. It would be very easy to violate your topic ban—there is content on w:uk:Голодомор в Україні (1946—1947) that, if you were to add it, would violate your topic ban. If your goal is to have the topic ban lifted in 3 months, when you can appeal it to the administrator's noticeboard, I would suggest that you continue to translate pages that do not require one to get deep into the weeds on (post-)Soviet politics.
I'm not able to handle your other request myself, but I have forwarded it to the functionaries who can.
Please let me know on my talk page if you have any further questions going forward.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Thank you! --
UA0Volodymyr (
talk) 03:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Your second email is noted. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again. -- UA0Volodymyr ( talk) 05:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Your second email is noted. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an
edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and
linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please
add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I note that you have placed the {{
translated page}} template on relevant talk pages already, but I did want to make you aware of the requirement that a link to the original page be included in an edit summary when you perform a translation. Thank you, and happy editing! —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 03:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I have received an email full of expletives from user "UA0Volodymyr." Are you the author of this email? Alaexis ¿question? 21:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics. v/r -
Seawolf35
T--
C 18:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Welcome to WikiProject History! We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to history. Now that you're a member you might want to drop by one of our Working Groups. It is also recommended that you watchlist our talk page as well. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Working Groups at WikiProject History: Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces |
I have blocked you for abuse of email and a violation of your topic ban (disputes between Russia and Ukraine). As this block is based on private evidence, you may appeal to arbcom-en
wikimedia.org.
Maxim (
talk) 14:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
To editor Maxim: Thanks for reverting me if I was in error. What do I misunderstand about this checkuser block? If UA0Volodymyr is blocked for a topic ban, why is it listed in this manner? Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- In rare circumstances, a checkuser block isn't about socking. For example, it could involve information obtained using the CheckUser tool, so the block must by necessity be marked as such, as it would be difficult for a non-checkuser to review the evidence.
Maxim (
talk) 15:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. This is the first time in ten years I recall seeing this sort of block. Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on
Rosa Luxemburg, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been
reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's
talk page before making it, to gain
consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you.
LegalSmeagolian (
talk) 20:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://enc.rusdeutsch.ru/articles/5719. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Broc ( talk) 15:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
P-Makoto (she/her) (
talk) 22:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
To reviewing administrators: please note two ANI threads ( 1, 2) that have followed the earlier unblock with topic ban. Note that the sockpuppet account P2342 was used while the first ANI thread was ongoing. Maxim ( talk) 15:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Ze'ev Red ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The only purpose of the using the sock-puppet was to make one constructive edit bypassing the top ban within WP:IAR, so it was legitimate. Yeah, I made a few more edits before I logged out of it, but they also were good faith. UA0Volodymyr ( talk) 15:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
What you've just described is textbook sockpuppetry. If you think your conduct was legitimate, then that alone is reason not to unblock you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20170914061454/https://enc.rusdeutsch.ru/articles/5719 and The above was copied to https://miningwiki.ru/wiki/Общество_Русской_Горнозаводской_Промышленности, see WP:CP#27 February 2024. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Isochrone ( talk) 19:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have received your email, where you inquired about whether your topic ban prohibits you from making edits to Soviet famine of 1946–1947 in Ukraine. In the interest of transparency, and so other administrators can see this clarifying statement, I am responding here rather than by e-mail.
In short, your topic ban does not per se cover this subject wholly. If any edit you make adds content involving the ethnic identity of particular individuals where it is disputed whether their ethnicity is Ukrainian, or adds content relating to disputes between the countries of Russia and Ukraine, then your edit is prohibited.
I am generally not too familiar with the historiography of the 1946-47 famine in the Ukraine, but if it is anything like that of the Holodomor I would strongly advise you to avoid making edits there. It would be very easy to violate your topic ban—there is content on w:uk:Голодомор в Україні (1946—1947) that, if you were to add it, would violate your topic ban. If your goal is to have the topic ban lifted in 3 months, when you can appeal it to the administrator's noticeboard, I would suggest that you continue to translate pages that do not require one to get deep into the weeds on (post-)Soviet politics.
I'm not able to handle your other request myself, but I have forwarded it to the functionaries who can.
Please let me know on my talk page if you have any further questions going forward.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Thank you! --
UA0Volodymyr (
talk) 03:17, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Your second email is noted. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again. -- UA0Volodymyr ( talk) 05:20, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Your second email is noted. —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 05:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an
edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and
linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please
add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I note that you have placed the {{
translated page}} template on relevant talk pages already, but I did want to make you aware of the requirement that a link to the original page be included in an edit summary when you perform a translation. Thank you, and happy editing! —
Red-tailed hawk
(nest) 03:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I have received an email full of expletives from user "UA0Volodymyr." Are you the author of this email? Alaexis ¿question? 21:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see
Wikipedia:Contentious topics. v/r -
Seawolf35
T--
C 18:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Welcome to WikiProject History! We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to history. Now that you're a member you might want to drop by one of our Working Groups. It is also recommended that you watchlist our talk page as well. Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:12, 26 January 2024 (UTC) Working Groups at WikiProject History: Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces |
I have blocked you for abuse of email and a violation of your topic ban (disputes between Russia and Ukraine). As this block is based on private evidence, you may appeal to arbcom-enwikimedia.org.
Maxim (
talk) 14:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
To editor Maxim: Thanks for reverting me if I was in error. What do I misunderstand about this checkuser block? If UA0Volodymyr is blocked for a topic ban, why is it listed in this manner? Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- In rare circumstances, a checkuser block isn't about socking. For example, it could involve information obtained using the CheckUser tool, so the block must by necessity be marked as such, as it would be difficult for a non-checkuser to review the evidence.
Maxim (
talk) 15:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. This is the first time in ten years I recall seeing this sort of block. Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on
Rosa Luxemburg, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been
reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's
talk page before making it, to gain
consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you.
LegalSmeagolian (
talk) 20:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://enc.rusdeutsch.ru/articles/5719. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Broc ( talk) 15:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
P-Makoto (she/her) (
talk) 22:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
To reviewing administrators: please note two ANI threads ( 1, 2) that have followed the earlier unblock with topic ban. Note that the sockpuppet account P2342 was used while the first ANI thread was ongoing. Maxim ( talk) 15:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Ze'ev Red ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The only purpose of the using the sock-puppet was to make one constructive edit bypassing the top ban within WP:IAR, so it was legitimate. Yeah, I made a few more edits before I logged out of it, but they also were good faith. UA0Volodymyr ( talk) 15:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
What you've just described is textbook sockpuppetry. If you think your conduct was legitimate, then that alone is reason not to unblock you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on RussischeMontanindustrie-Aktien-Gesellschaft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://web.archive.org/web/20170914061454/https://enc.rusdeutsch.ru/articles/5719 and The above was copied to https://miningwiki.ru/wiki/Общество_Русской_Горнозаводской_Промышленности, see WP:CP#27 February 2024. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Isochrone ( talk) 19:34, 26 March 2024 (UTC)