 | This user may have left Wikipedia. StjJackson has not edited Wikipedia since 17 January 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
StjJackson, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
|
Hello, I'm
Masssly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
—M@sssly
✉ 08:50, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry Fay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I've undone your contribution on Category:Fictional American people of Irish descent because some Irish people are considered British due to UK's occupation on North Ireland. Please check the facts before undoing an edit.-- NeoBatfreak ( talk) 21:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Cabell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 707, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salinas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramzi Yousef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuwaiti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent edit to Craig Ferguson. Unfortunately the edit was reverted because it does not comply with the policy at WP:UKPLACE. Please note that there is a comment on that line in the article requesting editors to not change the line. If you think the country name needs to be added in defiance of WP:UKPLACE you should start a new thread on Talk:Craig Ferguson and gain a consensus among interested editors. Thanks, have a good day. — Bill W. ( Talk) ( Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 19:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Senda Berenson Abbott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Oliver Cromwell, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Dhtwiki (
talk) 04:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palpatine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Lord. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer Talk 01:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Re your edits here and here, see WP:INFOBOXFLAG: "The documentation of a number of common infoboxes (e.g. Template:Infobox company, Template:Infobox film, Template:Infobox person, Template:Infobox football biography, Template:Infobox Weapon) have long explicitly deprecated the use of flag icons." Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. - BilCat ( talk) 00:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please stop adding flags to Infobox Weapons, as you did here. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 10:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TWA Flight 541, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Williamson County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't add her name to this article. It is against the law in Canada to report it, and Wikipedia is not including it under an OTRS ticket. It has been repeatedly RevDel'ed from the article. Meters ( talk) 19:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, I see I never actually undid your edit, and someone else had to do it. Meters ( talk) 21:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi StjJackson, I reverted your edit to Ghouta chemical attack because responsibility has been heavily contested, so much so that the subject has been under mediation (which is technically ongoing): see here and here. If you have questions, I'd ask that you please read the mediation discussions, or contact the mediator, Sunray. Best, - Darouet ( talk) 16:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timequest (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clint Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your recent edit to The Patriot (2000 film) since the criticism around the depictions of the British army is referring to the 18th century wars in Europe and the Americas and the Irish Confederate Wars occurred in the 17th century. Further, I don't see the situation you're describing on the WP page. Yojimbo1941 ( talk) 15:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
In an edit you made to that article a few months ago, you added a claim to the infobox that the event was "state terrorism" but you didn't provide a source nor use an edit summary to explain that. Since it doesn't seem like the Boston Massacre was state terrorism, would you have any issues with that text getting removed? RunnyAmiga ( talk) 00:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2007 Bagram Airfield bombing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assassination attempt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at
Donald Trump, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. ~
Awilley (
talk) 15:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page
Tank destroyer, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 05:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Germanwings Flight 9525, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —
Prhart
com♥ 13:11, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, StjJackson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Franchesca Ramsey. Thank you.
Dennis Bratland (
talk) 22:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours to the page
Equal Pay Act of 1963 has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Sro23 (
talk) 00:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
American Civil War. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 01:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Arlington National Cemetery and
Republican Party (United States). Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --
KMJKWhite (
talk) 14:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Can you edit on the United Airlines Flight 93 article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.247.125 ( talk) 23:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that attributes the crash to pilot error. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Consensus has not been reached on whether the 7 April strike qualifies as a massacre perpetuated by the United States. Please refrain from adding the articles to categories unnecessarily. Thank you.
Re your edit(s) at Charles Pomeroy Stone have been reversed, see WP:MOS and WP:INFOBOXFLAG: "The documentation of a number of common infoboxes have long explicitly deprecated the use of flag icons in infoboxes." Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. - GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Acroterion (talk) 09:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Another set of sanctions also applies to biographies of living persons, including talkpages
[1].
Acroterion
(talk) 09:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- A reminder: you've established that you have an animus against
Anita Sarkeesian
[2], and have been warned about GamerGate and BLP restrictions. If you do this
[3] again you will face editing restrictions.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- And another reminder. Please stop testing boundaries, we've established that you don't like Sarkeesian, which is an excellent reason for you to avoid the topic. This edit [4] doesn't warrant a topic ban, but if you keep this up, one day somebody will have to fill out all the paperwork and formalize one. Acroterion (talk) 04:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- A reminder: you've established that you have an animus against
Anita Sarkeesian
[2], and have been warned about GamerGate and BLP restrictions. If you do this
[3] again you will face editing restrictions.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Category:Songs about love has been nominated for discussion
Category:Songs about love, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho ( talk) 09:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
You have a reliable source for that.? It means, according to the article you linked to, "s primarily associated with acts of violence perpetrated by proponents of insurrectionary anarchism". Doug Weller talk 17:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Actually you'd need multiple reliable sources and infoboxes are meant to reflect what the article says, not editors' opinions. Doug Weller talk 17:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Type 91 torpedo.
BilCat (
talk) 22:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you add
defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
RolandR (
talk) 14:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, StjJackson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article currently says that Marrion Baker saw Oswald on the second floor, but JFK historian Stan Dane has pointed out in his book and research, “Prayer Man”, that Baker originally said he saw a man walking away from a stairway on the 3rd or 4th floor, a man who doesn’t match Oswald’s description, and that original interrogation reports say Oswald was on the first floor, at the entrance, (not in the first floor room or second floor lunchroom) and may have captured on film outside, and is the figure called “Prayer Man”. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.235.62 ( talk) 02:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
I just noticed that the Lee Harvey Oswald article (great job, btw, it certainly deserves its star) contradicts the one covering Jim Leavelle. This article says Oswald was questioned by Detective Jim Leavelle about the shooting of Officer Tippit on the 22nd after his arrest. But Leavelle’s biographical article on Wikipedia states the exact opposite - that he only interrogated Oswald on the 24th - the morning Oswald was shot, and that he had never talked to him before. Not accusing Leavelle of being unrealible or a liar but his interviews he has done in recent years are in contray to his WC testimony. Memory always distort from time to time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.22.148 ( talk) 18:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
Braintree High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
John from Idegon (
talk) 20:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
September 11 attacks. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
David J Johnson (
talk) 19:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I am always bemused by how many opinions we hold in common, and how many others in which we are bitterly opposed. -- Orange Mike | Talk 22:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, StjJackson. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of accidents and incidents involving the DC-3 in 1959, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hzh ( talk) 11:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Anita Sarkeesian. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Kaldari (
talk) 04:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Also, implying that a WP:BLP has committed a crime without the sources for it is significantly problematic, and continuing to do so is liable to get you blocked. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 20:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
General Ization. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article,
Harry S. Truman, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk 02:12, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Assassination attempt survivors has been nominated for discussion
Category:Assassination attempt survivors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Catrìona ( talk) 00:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Harry S. Truman.
Binksternet (
talk) 10:07, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 16:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, StjJackson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of James Genrich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Genrich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Genrich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
United States Domestic Policy Council, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Bettering the Wiki (
talk) 08:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Liam Neeson, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contributions) 22:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Ma'alot massacre
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-massacre-in-maalot/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
"Mulatto Axe murders" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mulatto Axe murders. Since you had some involvement with the Mulatto Axe murders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Fiamh ( talk, contribs) 22:03, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 02:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Mirage (Ruff novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
I have again removed the links to real life parallels of the plot section. Please refer to Wikipedia:Piped link#Transparency for clarification as to why. -- 85.76.70.67 ( talk) 01:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello colleague,
I am interested in the Middle Ages too.
I created Category:Medieval civilizations which is part of Category:Civilizations by time. The former is nominated for deletion and at the moment the vote is 2:0 in favor of deletion. I am used to deletions, but this time I am stunned. I do not believe there is no place for such a category. I believe that most people with interest in history would agree that civilizations existed in the Middle Ages. I ask people to contribute their opinion to the discussion. Regards,-- Maxaxa ( talk) 02:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Black Confederates
A tag has been placed on Category:Black Confederates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
|
| This user may have left Wikipedia. StjJackson has not edited Wikipedia since 17 January 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
StjJackson, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
|
|
Hello, I'm
Masssly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
—M@sssly
✉ 08:50, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry Fay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I've undone your contribution on Category:Fictional American people of Irish descent because some Irish people are considered British due to UK's occupation on North Ireland. Please check the facts before undoing an edit.-- NeoBatfreak ( talk) 21:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Cabell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of accidents and incidents involving the Boeing 707, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salinas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramzi Yousef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuwaiti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent edit to Craig Ferguson. Unfortunately the edit was reverted because it does not comply with the policy at WP:UKPLACE. Please note that there is a comment on that line in the article requesting editors to not change the line. If you think the country name needs to be added in defiance of WP:UKPLACE you should start a new thread on Talk:Craig Ferguson and gain a consensus among interested editors. Thanks, have a good day. — Bill W. ( Talk) ( Contrib) (User:Wtwilson3) — 19:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Senda Berenson Abbott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Oliver Cromwell, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Dhtwiki (
talk) 04:30, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palpatine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Lord. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi there! Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Ethiopian Airlines Flight 961 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer Talk 01:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Re your edits here and here, see WP:INFOBOXFLAG: "The documentation of a number of common infoboxes (e.g. Template:Infobox company, Template:Infobox film, Template:Infobox person, Template:Infobox football biography, Template:Infobox Weapon) have long explicitly deprecated the use of flag icons." Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. - BilCat ( talk) 00:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Please stop adding flags to Infobox Weapons, as you did here. Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 10:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TWA Flight 541, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Williamson County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't add her name to this article. It is against the law in Canada to report it, and Wikipedia is not including it under an OTRS ticket. It has been repeatedly RevDel'ed from the article. Meters ( talk) 19:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, I see I never actually undid your edit, and someone else had to do it. Meters ( talk) 21:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi StjJackson, I reverted your edit to Ghouta chemical attack because responsibility has been heavily contested, so much so that the subject has been under mediation (which is technically ongoing): see here and here. If you have questions, I'd ask that you please read the mediation discussions, or contact the mediator, Sunray. Best, - Darouet ( talk) 16:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timequest (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clint Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your recent edit to The Patriot (2000 film) since the criticism around the depictions of the British army is referring to the 18th century wars in Europe and the Americas and the Irish Confederate Wars occurred in the 17th century. Further, I don't see the situation you're describing on the WP page. Yojimbo1941 ( talk) 15:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
In an edit you made to that article a few months ago, you added a claim to the infobox that the event was "state terrorism" but you didn't provide a source nor use an edit summary to explain that. Since it doesn't seem like the Boston Massacre was state terrorism, would you have any issues with that text getting removed? RunnyAmiga ( talk) 00:09, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2007 Bagram Airfield bombing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assassination attempt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at
Donald Trump, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. ~
Awilley (
talk) 15:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page
Tank destroyer, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to
respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 05:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Germanwings Flight 9525, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —
Prhart
com♥ 13:11, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
|
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, StjJackson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Franchesca Ramsey. Thank you.
Dennis Bratland (
talk) 22:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours to the page
Equal Pay Act of 1963 has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Sro23 (
talk) 00:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
American Civil War. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Orange Mike |
Talk 01:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Arlington National Cemetery and
Republican Party (United States). Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --
KMJKWhite (
talk) 14:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Can you edit on the United Airlines Flight 93 article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.247.125 ( talk) 23:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing in the source that attributes the crash to pilot error. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Consensus has not been reached on whether the 7 April strike qualifies as a massacre perpetuated by the United States. Please refrain from adding the articles to categories unnecessarily. Thank you.
Re your edit(s) at Charles Pomeroy Stone have been reversed, see WP:MOS and WP:INFOBOXFLAG: "The documentation of a number of common infoboxes have long explicitly deprecated the use of flag icons in infoboxes." Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. - GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Acroterion (talk) 09:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Another set of sanctions also applies to biographies of living persons, including talkpages
[1].
Acroterion
(talk) 09:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- A reminder: you've established that you have an animus against
Anita Sarkeesian
[2], and have been warned about GamerGate and BLP restrictions. If you do this
[3] again you will face editing restrictions.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- And another reminder. Please stop testing boundaries, we've established that you don't like Sarkeesian, which is an excellent reason for you to avoid the topic. This edit [4] doesn't warrant a topic ban, but if you keep this up, one day somebody will have to fill out all the paperwork and formalize one. Acroterion (talk) 04:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- A reminder: you've established that you have an animus against
Anita Sarkeesian
[2], and have been warned about GamerGate and BLP restrictions. If you do this
[3] again you will face editing restrictions.
Acroterion
(talk) 23:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Category:Songs about love has been nominated for discussion
Category:Songs about love, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho ( talk) 09:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
You have a reliable source for that.? It means, according to the article you linked to, "s primarily associated with acts of violence perpetrated by proponents of insurrectionary anarchism". Doug Weller talk 17:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Actually you'd need multiple reliable sources and infoboxes are meant to reflect what the article says, not editors' opinions. Doug Weller talk 17:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Type 91 torpedo.
BilCat (
talk) 22:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you add
defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
RolandR (
talk) 14:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, StjJackson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article currently says that Marrion Baker saw Oswald on the second floor, but JFK historian Stan Dane has pointed out in his book and research, “Prayer Man”, that Baker originally said he saw a man walking away from a stairway on the 3rd or 4th floor, a man who doesn’t match Oswald’s description, and that original interrogation reports say Oswald was on the first floor, at the entrance, (not in the first floor room or second floor lunchroom) and may have captured on film outside, and is the figure called “Prayer Man”. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.235.62 ( talk) 02:33, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
I just noticed that the Lee Harvey Oswald article (great job, btw, it certainly deserves its star) contradicts the one covering Jim Leavelle. This article says Oswald was questioned by Detective Jim Leavelle about the shooting of Officer Tippit on the 22nd after his arrest. But Leavelle’s biographical article on Wikipedia states the exact opposite - that he only interrogated Oswald on the 24th - the morning Oswald was shot, and that he had never talked to him before. Not accusing Leavelle of being unrealible or a liar but his interviews he has done in recent years are in contray to his WC testimony. Memory always distort from time to time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.22.148 ( talk) 18:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit to
Braintree High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list
should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's
notability guideline. Thank you.
John from Idegon (
talk) 20:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
September 11 attacks. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
David J Johnson (
talk) 19:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I am always bemused by how many opinions we hold in common, and how many others in which we are bitterly opposed. -- Orange Mike | Talk 22:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, StjJackson. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of accidents and incidents involving the DC-3 in 1959, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Hzh ( talk) 11:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Anita Sarkeesian. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Kaldari (
talk) 04:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Also, implying that a WP:BLP has committed a crime without the sources for it is significantly problematic, and continuing to do so is liable to get you blocked. Galobtter ( pingó mió) 20:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
General Ization. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article,
Harry S. Truman, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
General Ization
Talk 02:12, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Assassination attempt survivors has been nominated for discussion
Category:Assassination attempt survivors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Catrìona ( talk) 00:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Harry S. Truman.
Binksternet (
talk) 10:07, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 16:21, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, StjJackson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of James Genrich for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Genrich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Genrich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
United States Domestic Policy Council, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Bettering the Wiki (
talk) 08:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Liam Neeson, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contributions) 22:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Ma'alot massacre
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-massacre-in-maalot/, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
"Mulatto Axe murders" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mulatto Axe murders. Since you had some involvement with the Mulatto Axe murders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Fiamh ( talk, contribs) 22:03, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
UW Dawgs (
talk) 02:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Mirage (Ruff novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World Trade Center ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
I have again removed the links to real life parallels of the plot section. Please refer to Wikipedia:Piped link#Transparency for clarification as to why. -- 85.76.70.67 ( talk) 01:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello colleague,
I am interested in the Middle Ages too.
I created Category:Medieval civilizations which is part of Category:Civilizations by time. The former is nominated for deletion and at the moment the vote is 2:0 in favor of deletion. I am used to deletions, but this time I am stunned. I do not believe there is no place for such a category. I believe that most people with interest in history would agree that civilizations existed in the Middle Ages. I ask people to contribute their opinion to the discussion. Regards,-- Maxaxa ( talk) 02:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Black Confederates
A tag has been placed on Category:Black Confederates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:26, 2 March 2023 (UTC)