From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 25

14:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Changes to the article on Hobart Freeman

You removed the source documents for three references I inserted into this article, and requested citation of third party sources.

However:

1) There are NO third party sources.
2) The points made in consequence to those references are important and valid.
3) I'm probably the only person who has retained these ephemera.

Consequently, they either need to be left in, or referenced someway as ephemera, in which case you'll need to direct me to the appropriate protocol. If there is no such protocol, then one should be created.

Jon
Jgk168421 ( talk) 12:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

@ Jgk168421: Thanks for writing me about this. Since you admit there are no third-party sources, I don't know how 1) anyone can verify the documents; 2) we can demonstrate the relevance/importance of the documents. We can't simply decide they are important on our own. I'm afraid they are going to have to be kept out of the article, because including them goes against WP:OR and WP:V. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 13:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Opioid use disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Opioid use disorder. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for facilitating the successful move of Amul Thapar after my botched efforts :) Marquardtika ( talk) 17:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

The SPI you initiated

I have noticed that user as well. You might want to add to your report these two confirmed which would not be stale - User:MarketMartha and User:EdelweissofNE. Same incremental edits, same insistence on "upscale" and sole focus on New England Malls. Also, blocked one week before the creation of the reported account. Happy editing! ScrpIron IV 17:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and you also might want to add IP 67.246.36.38. Same user, same edits. ScrpIron IV 19:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
@ ScrapIronIV: thank you for the tips, as I do think there is a relation. I have updated the case accordingly. I had already noted the similar edits coming from IP 67.246.36.38. Feel free to add any additional information to the case that you think may help. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Category closure

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_27#Category:People_associated_with_Muhammad_Ali, I noticed you have some plans for follow-up. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I've had a look at the revision in question and cant substantiate any Copyvio problems, as the template is only suggested for obvious cases of copyvio I've raised the issue at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2017 April 8 and removed the template per the templates instructions. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Amortias: OK, fair enough. I was going by the appearance and admission by the editor who added it that the material came straight from liner notes. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 12:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

A Quote for you

science & values
Reconciling of science with values make life exquisite.~ Mohammad Khatami ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا ( talk) 16:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lithuania

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lithuania. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Edits

My edits made to the subject Shaun King were correctly cited so there was no reason for any complaints to be made about me. Campbell301 ( talkcontribs) 03:09, 12 April 2016‎ (UTC)

@ Campbell301:, the consensus appears to not be in agreement with including the material. Besides, you were blocked because of edit-warring and nothing else. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 03:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Come on....

SUrely this is not a good use of our time to be debating this. [13]. WP:ASOF dates always reflect the latest date at which the fact was true. It is true now, so we update the date. Please don't edit war over such a silly issue.  —  Amakuru ( talk) 08:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Amakuru: since I never "edit-warred" over this, I miss that point. Otherwise, presidential elections are obviously every 4 years, so the information cannot reasonably change until 2020. I appeal to common sense per WP:IAR on this one. I even got thanked for my revert. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 11:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Alright then, apologies for saying it was an edit war, obviously it wasn't. It still seems wrong to me - "as of" is usually used to mean "currently", but allowing for the fact that the information may change. If something says "as of <earlier year>" then usually it either needs removing, if the fact is no longer correct, or updating to the current year, if the fact is still correct. Keeping it at 2016 just makes it look out of date to me, and no doubt to other readers who may not be familiar with the four year election cycle. Anyway, no matter, I'd appreciate if you would change it back to 2017, but if you're certain you're correct in this matter then I'll defer to your better judgement! Thanks  —  Amakuru ( talk) 13:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

ACICS Accreditation

Please refer to an ongoing discussion on ACICS:

/info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Universities

"A few months ago, the U.S. Department of Education stripped recognition of the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS), a national accreditor that focused on for-profit institutions in the U.S. The accreditor has sued the federal government to retain this recognition but as of right now the government's decision stands. The 245 institutions that were previously accredited by ACICS have all received approval from the Department of Education to continue receiving federal financial aid for up to 18 months while they seek a new accreditor. The question on the table: How do we describe the accreditation status of these institutions? One editor has begun changing the articles of the affected institutions to describe them as "unaccredited." I'm not sure that is entirely accurate as that is how we describe institutions that are not accredited at all, usually because they are diploma mills or scams that have never been accredited or in a few rare instances because they have ideological objections to the process of accreditation. Since in most cases "unaccredited" is shorthand for "scam" my primary worry is that simply saying "unaccredited" paints many of these institutions with a broad brush that is the wrong color. Should we say that these institutions were previously accredited by ACICS and are now seeking a new accreditor without actually saying that they're "unaccredited?" Are they "provisionally accredited" right now (personally, I lean away from this option because it sounds too technical and I think it's actually language used by some accreditors for institutions that are in the process of applying)? Are there other options or considerations? I haven't yet found any good language in other reliable sources but I imagine there is some out there for someone else who has some more time to look! There are 245 institutions that are affected by this so I really think we should figure out a consistent approach for all of the articles affected by this issue. Feel free to drop notices to this discussion in the appropriate places or expand to this to an RfC or something similar. ElKevbo (talk) 13:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

The term "provisionally accredited" is not too technical to me. It is accurate in describing the 18-month transition period and the steps they are undergoing to apply for a new accreditor. Although it may appear harsh to suggest that ACICS schools could be diploma mills, previous cases indicate that ACICS has been an unreliable accreditor for a long time. ITT Tech and Corinthian Colleges are notable schools that collapsed under ACICS accreditation. Refer to Herguan University, which was accredited by ACICS even after its former president was jailed for one year due to student visa fraud. Northwestern Polytechnic University and Silicon Valley University have been reported by BuzzFeed to be operating "upmarket" visa mills and abusing tax laws to make more profit. Source: https://www.buzzfeed.com/mollyhensleyclancy/inside-the-school-that-abolished-the-f-and-raked-in-the-cash In California, ACICS schools are encouraged to apply for full approval to operate in the state by using the "application for non-accredited institutions". Does this suggest that they are currently unaccredited? Source: http://www.bppe.ca.gov/schools/acics_ltr.pdf Bcf1291 (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC) I think "provisionally accredited" fairly accurately describes that they are recognised by the Dept of Ed for a limited period but that it is uncertain whether they will remain accredited beyond that period, it's certainly preferable to either "unaccredited" or plain "accredited", both of which are potentially misleading. They are technically receiving funding under "provisional Program Participation Agreements" (according to the Inside Higher Ed article), so a more technically accurate, but much more long-winded, description (possibly suitable for the main body text, but not infoboxes) might be "Previously accredited by ACICS and approved to receive Department of Education funding under a provisional Program Participation Agreement for 18 months from December 12, 2016 while seeking a new accreditor, following the final decision on that date to terminate the Department of Education's recognition of ACICS as an accrediting agency." (with citation of Inside Higher Ed article). Robminchin (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcf1291 ( talkcontribs)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Julian Lennon

Hi - We are trying to put a more recent picture up of Julian but it keeps getting removed.

The most recent one was taken from google images so should be free use. What can we do to get this sorted please. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razor7373 ( talkcontribs) 15:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Razor7373: on the Commons image page, you will need to set the applicable license and show where the image came from (exactly, with a URL) so that others can verify the license. It shows that you used the Upload Wizard -- the wizard should have made it clear that a license must be chosen. Also, the license must be compatible for use on Wikipedia. I recommend that you read this page on Commons as it fully explains what is expected for uploaded images. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 15:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Pleasure Ridge

I'd be happy to discuss this section but please leave it out til we decide how to cover it. Deaths in HS football average ~2 a year in the US. In itself, the death is not all that significant outside this school. The only thing significant is the coach being charged with a crime, which he was acquitted of. There is no reason to add to this basically nobody guy's already likely substantial remorse by memorializing it in one of the 5 most read websites in the world. Adding his name does violate WP:BLPCRIME and using staff names is outside school article guidelines. You'd need a substantially good reason to keep content with names, and without names it's WP:NOTNEWS. Depending on the age of the school and how much other history there is, a single sentence in history without names may be appropriate. It's all in the history, so it being out does not impressed discussion. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@ John from Idegon: this should be on Talk:Pleasure Ridge Park High School, not here, as it's about the article, not my work in general. As you can see on the article's talk page, I am open to removing names, but I very much disagree this is a WP:NOTNEWS issue. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
posted there. John from Idegon ( talk) 23:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I saw. I'll get to it tomorrow. I'm mostly off for the rest of the day. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 00:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of University of Louisville people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectrometry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject banner shell

Stevietheman, I saw your recent edit at Talk:Charlie Snyder (American football) to add the WikiProject United States banner. Is there a reason you added "1=" to the WikiProject banner shell at the top? It doesn't seem to have any function. Thanks, Jweiss11 ( talk) 23:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@ Jweiss11: I've been doing that for years based on how the banner shell originally worked. Even the documentation continues to say "The |1= is not optional and must be included at the end of the first line." Perhaps this is a matter to bring up at the template's talk page. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 10:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Stevietheman, thanks for the reply. I posed this question some time ago at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, but never got a response. I'll try posting at template's talk page, as you suggest. Jweiss11 ( talk) 14:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Please, stop reverting my information about Czech newspaper. I will be glad. Here you have a kitty. :)

Cepice ( talk) 14:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

You cannot tell someone to stop doing something flat out. I reverted for bona fide reasons. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 14:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lagardère Sports and Entertainment. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

FYI

I reported your IP buddy to AN3. What's a FWOMPT? Just curious. John from Idegon ( talk) 04:10, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks - I was thinking of doing it myself. FWOMPT = fucking waste of my precious time. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 04:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
On days when I'm thinking I'm hard to get along with, guys like this come along. I don't think I ever told you thanks for the last time we butted heads. It worked out well. So......thanks! John from Idegon ( talk) 04:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
@ John from Idegon: you might want to see what this IP user is posting on their page now. They are so out of bounds they are in the next county, and still haven't been blocked. /smh I have added to the complaint. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 06:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Six-Day War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Six-Day War. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

On your last comment

Chocolate with churros.

I didn't want to pursue the discussion at the IP's page the other day, but I would just like to say: don't let such get to you. We can probably be confident that the user's own troubles are heavier on their own life... This seemed to be the first incident (that I know, maybe not), involving this person, but if the same address stirs the same attitude in the future, WP:NOTHERE will be shortly obvious... Keep up the good work, —  Paleo Neonate — 08:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Revolutionary War. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

1RR

Hey there, I see you just self-reverted your second revert on Murder of Seth Rich. Please be careful about the 1RR restriction. If you have any questions about it, let me know. Many thanks, Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 18:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello StefenTower,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 812 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

22:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Assistance with proposed move

I've proposed moving Medical cannabis in the United States to Medical marijuana in the United States. My position is that there is no such thing as "Medical cannabis" in the US. Frankly, it's not much of a thing elsewhere. The only reason for the current title is that at some point, for what are no doubt reasonable motives, all pages on WP use cannabis per MOS:CONSISTENCY. To me, arguing for the move is MOS:JARGON, WP:TITLEVAR, WP:COMMONNAME, MOS:COMMONALITY, MOS:STRONGNAT, & WP:IGNORE. It may not be in your wheelhouse, but if you could point me toward any useful essays, policies or discussions, or if you'd like to comment or vote, it would be much appreciated.

I do not assume your support. Agree or disagree, your involvement would be most appreciated. Thanks Informata ob Iniquitatum ( talk) 02:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to test the Echo notification blacklist

Hello Stevietheman, The Echo notifications blacklist feature is ready for testing and we'd like your help 1) to test that the feature works as expected & 2) to verify that our documentation is accurate before we invite the larger Wikimedia community to test and provide feedback. Instructions about the feature are found on the meta page. It's available for testing on beta Wikipedia, which requires a separate account from production. It should be easy to test by using a sock or by buddying up. If you find any bugs, either write on the Phab ticket T150419 or email me directly. Feel free to edit the meta page as you see fit. Thank you, and happy testing!

Links-

For Anti-harassment tool team- SPoore (WMF) (talk) , Community Advocate, Community health initiative ( talk) 20:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Money.Net

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Money.Net. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sean Combs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Combs. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of pharmacies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of pharmacies. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Portland train attack. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bob Stoops

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Movement Strategy reminder

Hi. You contributed in a previous part of the discussion, so this is just a reminder to you (and any interested talkpagewatchers), that it's the second week of our Movement Strategy Cycle 3 discussion. There's a new topic each week in July, and this week's is: How could we capture the sum of all knowledge when much of it cannot be verified in traditional ways? You can see more details, and suggest solutions or respond to other people's thoughts (from this week and last week) at Wikipedia:Wikimedia Strategy 2017. You can also read a summary of discussions that took place in the past week. Cheers. Quiddity (WMF) ( talk) 03:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Western Kentucky Botanical Garden

Hello Stevietheman. I'm investigating a mystery. All the content we included on our organization's wiki, Western Kentucky Botanical Garden, has been deleted. Your information was listed as the "editor." Did you do this? Can I ask why if so? The information you left is out of and date and very incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:AE85:FD00:FDA1:CEDE:99D1:C19F ( talk) 19:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

I can address that to some point in Stevie's absence. If you look at his edit summary from his last edit back in March 26 it was "I'm sorry, but you cannot use the Wikipedia to write a brochure for your organization. We only write encyclopedia articles here". I think that speaks for itself. Wikipedia has specific policies about that can be read here: What Wikipedia is not § Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. -- rogerd ( talk) 22:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
What Rogerd said. It's also important to note that that this wiki article does not belong to your organization, including a right to edit it to look exactly the way you seem to prefer, as a marketing brochure formatted against our standards. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 17:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello StefenTower, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mary Jane Girls

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary Jane Girls. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Duke discography. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 25

14:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Changes to the article on Hobart Freeman

You removed the source documents for three references I inserted into this article, and requested citation of third party sources.

However:

1) There are NO third party sources.
2) The points made in consequence to those references are important and valid.
3) I'm probably the only person who has retained these ephemera.

Consequently, they either need to be left in, or referenced someway as ephemera, in which case you'll need to direct me to the appropriate protocol. If there is no such protocol, then one should be created.

Jon
Jgk168421 ( talk) 12:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

@ Jgk168421: Thanks for writing me about this. Since you admit there are no third-party sources, I don't know how 1) anyone can verify the documents; 2) we can demonstrate the relevance/importance of the documents. We can't simply decide they are important on our own. I'm afraid they are going to have to be kept out of the article, because including them goes against WP:OR and WP:V. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 13:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Opioid use disorder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Opioid use disorder. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for facilitating the successful move of Amul Thapar after my botched efforts :) Marquardtika ( talk) 17:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

The SPI you initiated

I have noticed that user as well. You might want to add to your report these two confirmed which would not be stale - User:MarketMartha and User:EdelweissofNE. Same incremental edits, same insistence on "upscale" and sole focus on New England Malls. Also, blocked one week before the creation of the reported account. Happy editing! ScrpIron IV 17:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Oh, and you also might want to add IP 67.246.36.38. Same user, same edits. ScrpIron IV 19:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
@ ScrapIronIV: thank you for the tips, as I do think there is a relation. I have updated the case accordingly. I had already noted the similar edits coming from IP 67.246.36.38. Feel free to add any additional information to the case that you think may help. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Category closure

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_27#Category:People_associated_with_Muhammad_Ali, I noticed you have some plans for follow-up. Marcocapelle ( talk) 17:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I've had a look at the revision in question and cant substantiate any Copyvio problems, as the template is only suggested for obvious cases of copyvio I've raised the issue at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2017 April 8 and removed the template per the templates instructions. Amortias ( T)( C) 12:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Amortias: OK, fair enough. I was going by the appearance and admission by the editor who added it that the material came straight from liner notes. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 12:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

A Quote for you

science & values
Reconciling of science with values make life exquisite.~ Mohammad Khatami ސ ޚ ލ ٰ ا ( talk) 16:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lithuania

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lithuania. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Edits

My edits made to the subject Shaun King were correctly cited so there was no reason for any complaints to be made about me. Campbell301 ( talkcontribs) 03:09, 12 April 2016‎ (UTC)

@ Campbell301:, the consensus appears to not be in agreement with including the material. Besides, you were blocked because of edit-warring and nothing else. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 03:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Come on....

SUrely this is not a good use of our time to be debating this. [13]. WP:ASOF dates always reflect the latest date at which the fact was true. It is true now, so we update the date. Please don't edit war over such a silly issue.  —  Amakuru ( talk) 08:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Amakuru: since I never "edit-warred" over this, I miss that point. Otherwise, presidential elections are obviously every 4 years, so the information cannot reasonably change until 2020. I appeal to common sense per WP:IAR on this one. I even got thanked for my revert. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 11:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Alright then, apologies for saying it was an edit war, obviously it wasn't. It still seems wrong to me - "as of" is usually used to mean "currently", but allowing for the fact that the information may change. If something says "as of <earlier year>" then usually it either needs removing, if the fact is no longer correct, or updating to the current year, if the fact is still correct. Keeping it at 2016 just makes it look out of date to me, and no doubt to other readers who may not be familiar with the four year election cycle. Anyway, no matter, I'd appreciate if you would change it back to 2017, but if you're certain you're correct in this matter then I'll defer to your better judgement! Thanks  —  Amakuru ( talk) 13:49, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

ACICS Accreditation

Please refer to an ongoing discussion on ACICS:

/info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Universities

"A few months ago, the U.S. Department of Education stripped recognition of the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS), a national accreditor that focused on for-profit institutions in the U.S. The accreditor has sued the federal government to retain this recognition but as of right now the government's decision stands. The 245 institutions that were previously accredited by ACICS have all received approval from the Department of Education to continue receiving federal financial aid for up to 18 months while they seek a new accreditor. The question on the table: How do we describe the accreditation status of these institutions? One editor has begun changing the articles of the affected institutions to describe them as "unaccredited." I'm not sure that is entirely accurate as that is how we describe institutions that are not accredited at all, usually because they are diploma mills or scams that have never been accredited or in a few rare instances because they have ideological objections to the process of accreditation. Since in most cases "unaccredited" is shorthand for "scam" my primary worry is that simply saying "unaccredited" paints many of these institutions with a broad brush that is the wrong color. Should we say that these institutions were previously accredited by ACICS and are now seeking a new accreditor without actually saying that they're "unaccredited?" Are they "provisionally accredited" right now (personally, I lean away from this option because it sounds too technical and I think it's actually language used by some accreditors for institutions that are in the process of applying)? Are there other options or considerations? I haven't yet found any good language in other reliable sources but I imagine there is some out there for someone else who has some more time to look! There are 245 institutions that are affected by this so I really think we should figure out a consistent approach for all of the articles affected by this issue. Feel free to drop notices to this discussion in the appropriate places or expand to this to an RfC or something similar. ElKevbo (talk) 13:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

The term "provisionally accredited" is not too technical to me. It is accurate in describing the 18-month transition period and the steps they are undergoing to apply for a new accreditor. Although it may appear harsh to suggest that ACICS schools could be diploma mills, previous cases indicate that ACICS has been an unreliable accreditor for a long time. ITT Tech and Corinthian Colleges are notable schools that collapsed under ACICS accreditation. Refer to Herguan University, which was accredited by ACICS even after its former president was jailed for one year due to student visa fraud. Northwestern Polytechnic University and Silicon Valley University have been reported by BuzzFeed to be operating "upmarket" visa mills and abusing tax laws to make more profit. Source: https://www.buzzfeed.com/mollyhensleyclancy/inside-the-school-that-abolished-the-f-and-raked-in-the-cash In California, ACICS schools are encouraged to apply for full approval to operate in the state by using the "application for non-accredited institutions". Does this suggest that they are currently unaccredited? Source: http://www.bppe.ca.gov/schools/acics_ltr.pdf Bcf1291 (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC) I think "provisionally accredited" fairly accurately describes that they are recognised by the Dept of Ed for a limited period but that it is uncertain whether they will remain accredited beyond that period, it's certainly preferable to either "unaccredited" or plain "accredited", both of which are potentially misleading. They are technically receiving funding under "provisional Program Participation Agreements" (according to the Inside Higher Ed article), so a more technically accurate, but much more long-winded, description (possibly suitable for the main body text, but not infoboxes) might be "Previously accredited by ACICS and approved to receive Department of Education funding under a provisional Program Participation Agreement for 18 months from December 12, 2016 while seeking a new accreditor, following the final decision on that date to terminate the Department of Education's recognition of ACICS as an accrediting agency." (with citation of Inside Higher Ed article). Robminchin (talk) 18:46, 19 April 2017 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcf1291 ( talkcontribs)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Julian Lennon

Hi - We are trying to put a more recent picture up of Julian but it keeps getting removed.

The most recent one was taken from google images so should be free use. What can we do to get this sorted please. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razor7373 ( talkcontribs) 15:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@ Razor7373: on the Commons image page, you will need to set the applicable license and show where the image came from (exactly, with a URL) so that others can verify the license. It shows that you used the Upload Wizard -- the wizard should have made it clear that a license must be chosen. Also, the license must be compatible for use on Wikipedia. I recommend that you read this page on Commons as it fully explains what is expected for uploaded images. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 15:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Pleasure Ridge

I'd be happy to discuss this section but please leave it out til we decide how to cover it. Deaths in HS football average ~2 a year in the US. In itself, the death is not all that significant outside this school. The only thing significant is the coach being charged with a crime, which he was acquitted of. There is no reason to add to this basically nobody guy's already likely substantial remorse by memorializing it in one of the 5 most read websites in the world. Adding his name does violate WP:BLPCRIME and using staff names is outside school article guidelines. You'd need a substantially good reason to keep content with names, and without names it's WP:NOTNEWS. Depending on the age of the school and how much other history there is, a single sentence in history without names may be appropriate. It's all in the history, so it being out does not impressed discussion. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@ John from Idegon: this should be on Talk:Pleasure Ridge Park High School, not here, as it's about the article, not my work in general. As you can see on the article's talk page, I am open to removing names, but I very much disagree this is a WP:NOTNEWS issue. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 19:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
posted there. John from Idegon ( talk) 23:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I saw. I'll get to it tomorrow. I'm mostly off for the rest of the day. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 00:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of University of Louisville people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectrometry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject banner shell

Stevietheman, I saw your recent edit at Talk:Charlie Snyder (American football) to add the WikiProject United States banner. Is there a reason you added "1=" to the WikiProject banner shell at the top? It doesn't seem to have any function. Thanks, Jweiss11 ( talk) 23:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@ Jweiss11: I've been doing that for years based on how the banner shell originally worked. Even the documentation continues to say "The |1= is not optional and must be included at the end of the first line." Perhaps this is a matter to bring up at the template's talk page. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 10:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Stevietheman, thanks for the reply. I posed this question some time ago at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, but never got a response. I'll try posting at template's talk page, as you suggest. Jweiss11 ( talk) 14:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Please, stop reverting my information about Czech newspaper. I will be glad. Here you have a kitty. :)

Cepice ( talk) 14:16, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

You cannot tell someone to stop doing something flat out. I reverted for bona fide reasons. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 14:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lagardère Sports and Entertainment. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

FYI

I reported your IP buddy to AN3. What's a FWOMPT? Just curious. John from Idegon ( talk) 04:10, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks - I was thinking of doing it myself. FWOMPT = fucking waste of my precious time. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 04:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
On days when I'm thinking I'm hard to get along with, guys like this come along. I don't think I ever told you thanks for the last time we butted heads. It worked out well. So......thanks! John from Idegon ( talk) 04:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
@ John from Idegon: you might want to see what this IP user is posting on their page now. They are so out of bounds they are in the next county, and still haven't been blocked. /smh I have added to the complaint. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 06:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Six-Day War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Six-Day War. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

On your last comment

Chocolate with churros.

I didn't want to pursue the discussion at the IP's page the other day, but I would just like to say: don't let such get to you. We can probably be confident that the user's own troubles are heavier on their own life... This seemed to be the first incident (that I know, maybe not), involving this person, but if the same address stirs the same attitude in the future, WP:NOTHERE will be shortly obvious... Keep up the good work, —  Paleo Neonate — 08:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:American Revolutionary War. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

1RR

Hey there, I see you just self-reverted your second revert on Murder of Seth Rich. Please be careful about the 1RR restriction. If you have any questions about it, let me know. Many thanks, Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 18:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello StefenTower,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 812 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

22:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Assistance with proposed move

I've proposed moving Medical cannabis in the United States to Medical marijuana in the United States. My position is that there is no such thing as "Medical cannabis" in the US. Frankly, it's not much of a thing elsewhere. The only reason for the current title is that at some point, for what are no doubt reasonable motives, all pages on WP use cannabis per MOS:CONSISTENCY. To me, arguing for the move is MOS:JARGON, WP:TITLEVAR, WP:COMMONNAME, MOS:COMMONALITY, MOS:STRONGNAT, & WP:IGNORE. It may not be in your wheelhouse, but if you could point me toward any useful essays, policies or discussions, or if you'd like to comment or vote, it would be much appreciated.

I do not assume your support. Agree or disagree, your involvement would be most appreciated. Thanks Informata ob Iniquitatum ( talk) 02:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to test the Echo notification blacklist

Hello Stevietheman, The Echo notifications blacklist feature is ready for testing and we'd like your help 1) to test that the feature works as expected & 2) to verify that our documentation is accurate before we invite the larger Wikimedia community to test and provide feedback. Instructions about the feature are found on the meta page. It's available for testing on beta Wikipedia, which requires a separate account from production. It should be easy to test by using a sock or by buddying up. If you find any bugs, either write on the Phab ticket T150419 or email me directly. Feel free to edit the meta page as you see fit. Thank you, and happy testing!

Links-

For Anti-harassment tool team- SPoore (WMF) (talk) , Community Advocate, Community health initiative ( talk) 20:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Money.Net

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Money.Net. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sean Combs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Combs. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of pharmacies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of pharmacies. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Portland train attack. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bob Stoops

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Movement Strategy reminder

Hi. You contributed in a previous part of the discussion, so this is just a reminder to you (and any interested talkpagewatchers), that it's the second week of our Movement Strategy Cycle 3 discussion. There's a new topic each week in July, and this week's is: How could we capture the sum of all knowledge when much of it cannot be verified in traditional ways? You can see more details, and suggest solutions or respond to other people's thoughts (from this week and last week) at Wikipedia:Wikimedia Strategy 2017. You can also read a summary of discussions that took place in the past week. Cheers. Quiddity (WMF) ( talk) 03:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Western Kentucky Botanical Garden

Hello Stevietheman. I'm investigating a mystery. All the content we included on our organization's wiki, Western Kentucky Botanical Garden, has been deleted. Your information was listed as the "editor." Did you do this? Can I ask why if so? The information you left is out of and date and very incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:AE85:FD00:FDA1:CEDE:99D1:C19F ( talk) 19:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

I can address that to some point in Stevie's absence. If you look at his edit summary from his last edit back in March 26 it was "I'm sorry, but you cannot use the Wikipedia to write a brochure for your organization. We only write encyclopedia articles here". I think that speaks for itself. Wikipedia has specific policies about that can be read here: What Wikipedia is not § Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. -- rogerd ( talk) 22:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
What Rogerd said. It's also important to note that that this wiki article does not belong to your organization, including a right to edit it to look exactly the way you seem to prefer, as a marketing brochure formatted against our standards. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 17:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello StefenTower, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mary Jane Girls

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary Jane Girls. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Duke discography. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook