You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Emir Kujović. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Giant
Snowman 19:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Montenegrin Americans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Please don't remove sourced content relevant to infobox statistics.
Iryna Harpy (
talk) 00:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I noticed that you wrote a comment about another editor (
diff) referring to another editor as
very obsessive and very biased
. That is clear violation of Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Taking in consideration that in the same edit you statedI've been here for ten years and am well aware of the rules
somebody might think that you deliberately violated this important policy in order to provoke another editor. Please accept my friendly advise to try not to repeat such violations in future. All the best.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 10:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sideshow Bob,
Just to inform you there is a discussion that might pertain to your edits as well, please feel free to give your opinion: Template_talk:Coat_of_arms#RFC. Thank you. Gryffindor ( talk) 08:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Martinići (1796), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turks and Piperi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
Duško Radinović
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Ognjen Spahić
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Stop with vandalism... if you dont know anything about basketbal articles here, then stop to edit them. Nationalities are not linked, and if Bjelica have Serbian passport he will have both nationalities in infobox. Just look at milion other arciles and maybe you will understand.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 12:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hsp starcevic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi.
When you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by updating |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter when updating club appearances and goals, or |ntupdate= (or |nationalteam-update=) when updating national team appearances and goals. The easiest way to do this is to use five tildes, which automatically converts to the current time. For example |club-update=~~~~~.
When you update the career statistics please remember that you should also update that timestamp as well to a time when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.
This is done to show other editors when the stats were last updated and prevent them from accidentally updating the stats again, and also it shows readers that it has been updated.
Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Petar I Petrović Njegoš shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 21:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Pošto vidim da si još uvijek s nama, možda ćeš biti zainteresovan s novijem projektom koji sam započeo sad skoro... Treba mi dosta pomoći, pa se tebi obraćam. Ako si zainteresovan, uđi pa udri!
-- Birziminium ( talk) 04:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Giuseppe Pinelli wasn't killed (consequently, he wasn't victim of human rights abuses). Please, don't change the page. -- 151.65.128.21 ( talk) 19:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- No, I'm pretty sure he jumped out of the police station window for fun then. Jog on...
Sideshow Bob 06:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the facts. All the rest is foul. -- 151.65.112.134 ( talk) 05:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
You marked the text as "disputed" and that it's correctness is proven false and yet, you gave no explanations or arguments why and where it is proven false and where it is proven that sources are false. If Mariano Bolizza, Vujovic, Ivo Banac and others are not reliable sources to you (Mariano Bolizza was one of the rare people who lived in 17th century and wrote about Piperi, Vujovic, Banac, Miller and Vukcevic are reliable and proven historians with a lot of books written about that topic and other similar topics), than you should really stop dealing with that topic or I will see what Wikipedia can do about vandalism and edit wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Jim Moriarty ( talk • contribs) 12:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Please don't place Carol at the end of the chain of command. I'm referring to this edit of yours. See the talk page. -- Cei Trei ( talk) 12:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The discussion in question is found on the talk page on the article about Siege of Plevna, but a similar argument is used for the entire war. The chain of command needs to be respected; however, if there's an argument that explains why we should list Carol at the bottom, please let us know. -- Cei Trei ( talk) 13:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NewArsenalTivatlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-free use of File:FSCG.png
Please do not be so quick to assume the worst with respect to other editors. Per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, the use of non-free logos, etc. is not automatic, so arguing WP:OTHERIMAGE is not very a valid justification for non-free use. This particular file's non-free use was previously discussed at WP:NFCR (a link to that discussion can be found on the file's page); so, if you feel it was removed in error and its non-free use should be re-considered, then they are ways go about doing that which do not involve edit warring (for reference, removing non-free files per a previous discussion is an exception to 3RR per WP:NOT3RR).
In general, with respect to non-free content use, logos such as this are considered acceptable when used as the primary means of identification in stand-alone articles about the national association/federation, but not so in individual national team articles because the main national body is considered to be the parent entity per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI, whereas the teams are considered to be child entities. This interpretation has been confirmed a number of times at WP:FFD or in discussions at WT:NFC, but you can ask for further clarification at WT:NFC if you like. Of course, there are many national team football articles on Wikipedia and in some cases the logo may be licensed as public domain or released under a free license which means its use would not be subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy; in other cases, the logo may be non-free, but there may be specific reasons why non-free use has been allowed or it may simply be the case that the file's non-free use has yet to be discussed. So, just as other stuff exists applies to articles, OTHERIMAGE applies to non-free use.
Like anything else, previous consensus about non-free use can change over time, so if you'd like to try and establish a new consensus for this particular file's non-free use, you can start a new discussion at FFD; on the other hand, if you feel a more general discussion is needed regarding this type of non-free use, then the best place to do that would be at WT:NFC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 10:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Metropolitans of Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Unijerina
Hello, Sideshow Bob,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Unijerina should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unijerina .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Slatersteven ( talk) 10:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Europe population map countries.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~
Rob13
Talk 17:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanikije Lipovac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 23:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montenegrin Third League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Federal and Zora ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Please do stop with your propaganda driven edits. Njegoš was not Milo's party member style ethnic Montenegrin. He was a proud Serbian nationalist. This is a well documented fact (if you need a number of sources, contact me).
I shall report you for starting an edit war and vandalising the page.
Mm.srb ( talk) 00:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Calm down, take a deep and try to formulate a coherent thought for starters. Sideshow Bob 06:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
I am going through the German districts in connection with a 'limited field' wiki - there seem to be quite a number where the English language WP page election results section when present is somewhat behind that of the German equivalent. Any suggestions as to proceeding (as my German is basic, and tables can be fiddly)? Jackiespeel ( talk) 10:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed this comment of yours ( diff). This comment is violation of WP:NPA. Me and my feelings are none of your business. If you again write comment about me I will report you. -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 21:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm K.e.coffman. Sideshow Bob, thanks for creating Uroš Tošković!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for improving Wikipedia's coverage of artists. Please consider converting bare URLs to proper references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Mm.srb (
talk) 01:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Good luck with that.
Sideshow Bob 08:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Good luck with further edits and insulting other users. And just for your enjoyment - Moje rodno selo je Trepča, kod Andrijevice, u Crnoj Gori. Ime selu dali su Vojinovići, potomci ili srodnici Vojinovića iz narodne pjesme, koji su se pred Turcima povukli iz Trepče kod Kosovske Mitrovice, prešli Ibar i prešli Lim, i svom novom naselju u Crnoj Gori, od želje, dali ime starog zavičaja. Ova nova Trepča, na Limu, pominje se već 1614. godine: imala je sto kuća (više nego danas), a starješina joj je bio Dragoje Lakov. Čitavo to stanovništvo, osim dvije-tri kuće Vojinovića, preselilo se s Arsenijem Čarnojevićem u Vojvodinu; na opustjela zemljišta sela tada su se naselili preci današnjeg stanovništva koji su došli iz Lijeve Rijeke da "srpsku zemlju" odbrane od tuđinskih naseljavanja i od Turaka. To o Trepči doznao sam kasnije, iz knjiga i predanja, ali u vrijeme moga djetinjstva knjige su tamo bile veoma rijetke — česte su bile samo nesreće, pogibije i pucnjave. Izvor - Svadba - Mihailo Lalić - Izdavačko preduzeće "Rad", Beograd, 1964 Mm.srb ( talk) 22:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
-
Damir Crepulja (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Dejan Lazović (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Igor Porobić (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Predrag Savović (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Uroš Čučković (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Vladan Spaić (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
G'day Sideshow Bob, you've been here longer than me, so you know not to edit war. I appreciate it is frustrating when people will not discuss on talk, but you are not helping by constantly reverting. You've done the right thing by bringing it to a dramaboard, but it isn't vandalism (per your edit summaries), it is a content dispute about using Banac's opinion. No doubt you didn't take it to the edit-warring one, but you would have been blocked as well, most likely. I have warned the IP. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
-
Dejan Lazović (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Igor Porobić (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Prison island (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Fascist Italy
-
Uroš Čučković (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mountains in Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volujak ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.
 | This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out. |
==
Is a strong claim and must be really proven. A twit will not do. Current events are the biggest protests in modern history of Montenegro and they have a proper place in the article. If you have any further concerns - take them to the TP for once. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- road blocks were susbituted by peaceful church gatherings (litije) and nonviolent walks, the said priest was not harmed and you are inserting fake news. please stop stalking me Road blocks are a fact and yet you removed that part with some unfortunate summary. Why? Attacks on several priests also took place (if they were not badly harmed is not important!). This is a POV pushing, not any constructive editing and most probably Wikipedia:I just don't like it. You did not give any proof or explained that they are fake news. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, they are not the biggest protests, as there were many anti-govt protest similar or larger in size. And I never said they should not be mentioned, but that there is no place for your essays and frivolous claims based on sources such as the pitiful Blic tabloid. On the other hand, I do not feel the need to discuss with a well known disruptive ultranationalist editor, due to glaringly obvious lack of good faith in your activity on almost all Montenegro-related articles. I hope that you find another hobby other than stalking and reverting my edits, and I would kindly ask you to leave my talk page alone. Feel free to discuss your problems on article talk pages, however.
Sideshow Bob 12:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- You presented no arguments, only some insults. No matter. I do not appreciate being labeled (ultra-whatever). Maybe that is considered normal in your tiny little divided country, but in the rest of the world - it's not. My hobby is just fine and I shall try to find even more time for it... voljno, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, they are not the biggest protests, as there were many anti-govt protest similar or larger in size. And I never said they should not be mentioned, but that there is no place for your essays and frivolous claims based on sources such as the pitiful Blic tabloid. On the other hand, I do not feel the need to discuss with a well known disruptive ultranationalist editor, due to glaringly obvious lack of good faith in your activity on almost all Montenegro-related articles. I hope that you find another hobby other than stalking and reverting my edits, and I would kindly ask you to leave my talk page alone. Feel free to discuss your problems on article talk pages, however.
Sideshow Bob 12:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have not insulted anyone, just stated the truth - the entire point of your activity on this website is tireless promotion of Serbian nationalism, end of. Regarding the article, I simply corrected some untrue claims, leaving most of your edit as it was. I do not care for your feelings, you can be butthurt all you want, I also do not care how you feel about my country, so you can jog on.
Sideshow Bob 13:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- You see what you want to see. Nice language, for a kafana. No arguments presented, no diffs, zero. Nobody can be hurt by wild claims and uncivil behaviour, such moments can only describe the author of such silly claims in the best way imagined. On the other hand, my comment on modern-day MNE is per facts presented on Wikipedia (size, population, economy, the fact that Montenegrins make less than 50% percent on the population). It is nothing personal, unlike your claims and labels ( Wikipedia:Civility). Any further labels will be reported without hesitation. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have not insulted anyone, just stated the truth - the entire point of your activity on this website is tireless promotion of Serbian nationalism, end of. Regarding the article, I simply corrected some untrue claims, leaving most of your edit as it was. I do not care for your feelings, you can be butthurt all you want, I also do not care how you feel about my country, so you can jog on.
Sideshow Bob 13:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
On your bike! Sideshow Bob 13:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Take a look and post a comment - [1]. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 15:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- The DRN at WP:DRN#Montenegro is waiting for your further input, and risks being closed, per the comment there by User:Nightenbelle. I hope you will consider rejoining the discussion. Presumably the recent edit by User:Sadko, which adds a 'See also' to 2019–20 Montenegrin crisis, may address some of your concerns about undue weight in the main Montenegro article. The issues on quality of sources and neutrality still remain to be settled. These questions could be reviewed at DRN. For example you could try to use DRN to agree on the wording of an RfC and then transfer the matter back to the article talk page. You have made reference to 'fake news' and 'ongoing obsession of this particular user with my Wikipedia activity' which may suggest that not everyone is completely calm. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Forca logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 04:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SDP Montenegro logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Mladost Ljeskopolje.png has been orphaned
I've removed this image from FK Podgorica as they updated their logo. This makes the image orphaned, and per WP:NFCC the image is subject to deletion in seven days. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dnpcg-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 20:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dua-udsh.logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 18:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Albanskaalternativa-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 19:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenjo Janković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Public holidays in Yugoslavia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:V and WP:GNG There are no references, my search for references did not find any WP:RS. The two other language articles have similar content and no reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jeepday (
talk) 18:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hsp starcevic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced or remove sourced content, as you did at
Crnojević noble family you may be
blocked from editing.
Theonewithreason (
talk) 08:28 06.June 2022 (UTC)
- You're the one being disruptive. Try adding some reason to your edits for change, and leave me alone. I just added a tag to notify readers of a load of unsourced horseshit in that article, and you are the one intentionally defending the false information. On your bike then. Sideshow Bob 08:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring.
Theonewithreason (
talk) 08:49 07.June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Demokratska Crna Gora logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
The article FK Partizan Momišići has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Chidgk1 (
talk) 06:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The article, FK Partizan Momišići, has been nominated for deletion. You may comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Partizan Momišići JoeNMLC ( talk) 20:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dscg-ldmz-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montenegrin Third League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Piperi and Zelenika.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make
personal attacks on other people, as you did at
Emir Kujović. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.
Giant
Snowman 19:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
Montenegrin Americans without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Please don't remove sourced content relevant to infobox statistics.
Iryna Harpy (
talk) 00:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I noticed that you wrote a comment about another editor (
diff) referring to another editor as
very obsessive and very biased
. That is clear violation of Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Taking in consideration that in the same edit you statedI've been here for ten years and am well aware of the rules
somebody might think that you deliberately violated this important policy in order to provoke another editor. Please accept my friendly advise to try not to repeat such violations in future. All the best.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 10:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sideshow Bob,
Just to inform you there is a discussion that might pertain to your edits as well, please feel free to give your opinion: Template_talk:Coat_of_arms#RFC. Thank you. Gryffindor ( talk) 08:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Martinići (1796), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turks and Piperi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
Duško Radinović
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Ognjen Spahić
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Stop with vandalism... if you dont know anything about basketbal articles here, then stop to edit them. Nationalities are not linked, and if Bjelica have Serbian passport he will have both nationalities in infobox. Just look at milion other arciles and maybe you will understand.-- Bozalegenda ( talk) 12:57, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of political parties in Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regionalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hsp starcevic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi.
When you update the stats in football players' infoboxes please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by updating |pcupdate= (or |club-update=) parameter when updating club appearances and goals, or |ntupdate= (or |nationalteam-update=) when updating national team appearances and goals. The easiest way to do this is to use five tildes, which automatically converts to the current time. For example |club-update=~~~~~.
When you update the career statistics please remember that you should also update that timestamp as well to a time when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.
This is done to show other editors when the stats were last updated and prevent them from accidentally updating the stats again, and also it shows readers that it has been updated.
Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 09:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Petar I Petrović Njegoš shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 21:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Pošto vidim da si još uvijek s nama, možda ćeš biti zainteresovan s novijem projektom koji sam započeo sad skoro... Treba mi dosta pomoći, pa se tebi obraćam. Ako si zainteresovan, uđi pa udri!
-- Birziminium ( talk) 04:12, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Giuseppe Pinelli wasn't killed (consequently, he wasn't victim of human rights abuses). Please, don't change the page. -- 151.65.128.21 ( talk) 19:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- No, I'm pretty sure he jumped out of the police station window for fun then. Jog on...
Sideshow Bob 06:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the facts. All the rest is foul. -- 151.65.112.134 ( talk) 05:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
You marked the text as "disputed" and that it's correctness is proven false and yet, you gave no explanations or arguments why and where it is proven false and where it is proven that sources are false. If Mariano Bolizza, Vujovic, Ivo Banac and others are not reliable sources to you (Mariano Bolizza was one of the rare people who lived in 17th century and wrote about Piperi, Vujovic, Banac, Miller and Vukcevic are reliable and proven historians with a lot of books written about that topic and other similar topics), than you should really stop dealing with that topic or I will see what Wikipedia can do about vandalism and edit wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Jim Moriarty ( talk • contribs) 12:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Please don't place Carol at the end of the chain of command. I'm referring to this edit of yours. See the talk page. -- Cei Trei ( talk) 12:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- The discussion in question is found on the talk page on the article about Siege of Plevna, but a similar argument is used for the entire war. The chain of command needs to be respected; however, if there's an argument that explains why we should list Carol at the bottom, please let us know. -- Cei Trei ( talk) 13:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NewArsenalTivatlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-free use of File:FSCG.png
Please do not be so quick to assume the worst with respect to other editors. Per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy, the use of non-free logos, etc. is not automatic, so arguing WP:OTHERIMAGE is not very a valid justification for non-free use. This particular file's non-free use was previously discussed at WP:NFCR (a link to that discussion can be found on the file's page); so, if you feel it was removed in error and its non-free use should be re-considered, then they are ways go about doing that which do not involve edit warring (for reference, removing non-free files per a previous discussion is an exception to 3RR per WP:NOT3RR).
In general, with respect to non-free content use, logos such as this are considered acceptable when used as the primary means of identification in stand-alone articles about the national association/federation, but not so in individual national team articles because the main national body is considered to be the parent entity per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI, whereas the teams are considered to be child entities. This interpretation has been confirmed a number of times at WP:FFD or in discussions at WT:NFC, but you can ask for further clarification at WT:NFC if you like. Of course, there are many national team football articles on Wikipedia and in some cases the logo may be licensed as public domain or released under a free license which means its use would not be subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy; in other cases, the logo may be non-free, but there may be specific reasons why non-free use has been allowed or it may simply be the case that the file's non-free use has yet to be discussed. So, just as other stuff exists applies to articles, OTHERIMAGE applies to non-free use.
Like anything else, previous consensus about non-free use can change over time, so if you'd like to try and establish a new consensus for this particular file's non-free use, you can start a new discussion at FFD; on the other hand, if you feel a more general discussion is needed regarding this type of non-free use, then the best place to do that would be at WT:NFC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 10:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Metropolitans of Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Unijerina
Hello, Sideshow Bob,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Unijerina should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unijerina .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Slatersteven ( talk) 10:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Europe population map countries.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ~
Rob13
Talk 17:35, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joanikije Lipovac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fascist Italy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 23:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montenegrin Third League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Federal and Zora ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Please do stop with your propaganda driven edits. Njegoš was not Milo's party member style ethnic Montenegrin. He was a proud Serbian nationalist. This is a well documented fact (if you need a number of sources, contact me).
I shall report you for starting an edit war and vandalising the page.
Mm.srb ( talk) 00:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Calm down, take a deep and try to formulate a coherent thought for starters. Sideshow Bob 06:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
I am going through the German districts in connection with a 'limited field' wiki - there seem to be quite a number where the English language WP page election results section when present is somewhat behind that of the German equivalent. Any suggestions as to proceeding (as my German is basic, and tables can be fiddly)? Jackiespeel ( talk) 10:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed this comment of yours ( diff). This comment is violation of WP:NPA. Me and my feelings are none of your business. If you again write comment about me I will report you. -- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 21:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm K.e.coffman. Sideshow Bob, thanks for creating Uroš Tošković!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for improving Wikipedia's coverage of artists. Please consider converting bare URLs to proper references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
K.e.coffman ( talk) 18:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sideshow Bob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Mm.srb (
talk) 01:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Good luck with that.
Sideshow Bob 08:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Good luck with further edits and insulting other users. And just for your enjoyment - Moje rodno selo je Trepča, kod Andrijevice, u Crnoj Gori. Ime selu dali su Vojinovići, potomci ili srodnici Vojinovića iz narodne pjesme, koji su se pred Turcima povukli iz Trepče kod Kosovske Mitrovice, prešli Ibar i prešli Lim, i svom novom naselju u Crnoj Gori, od želje, dali ime starog zavičaja. Ova nova Trepča, na Limu, pominje se već 1614. godine: imala je sto kuća (više nego danas), a starješina joj je bio Dragoje Lakov. Čitavo to stanovništvo, osim dvije-tri kuće Vojinovića, preselilo se s Arsenijem Čarnojevićem u Vojvodinu; na opustjela zemljišta sela tada su se naselili preci današnjeg stanovništva koji su došli iz Lijeve Rijeke da "srpsku zemlju" odbrane od tuđinskih naseljavanja i od Turaka. To o Trepči doznao sam kasnije, iz knjiga i predanja, ali u vrijeme moga djetinjstva knjige su tamo bile veoma rijetke — česte su bile samo nesreće, pogibije i pucnjave. Izvor - Svadba - Mihailo Lalić - Izdavačko preduzeće "Rad", Beograd, 1964 Mm.srb ( talk) 22:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
-
Damir Crepulja (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Dejan Lazović (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Igor Porobić (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Predrag Savović (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Uroš Čučković (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Vladan Spaić (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
G'day Sideshow Bob, you've been here longer than me, so you know not to edit war. I appreciate it is frustrating when people will not discuss on talk, but you are not helping by constantly reverting. You've done the right thing by bringing it to a dramaboard, but it isn't vandalism (per your edit summaries), it is a content dispute about using Banac's opinion. No doubt you didn't take it to the edit-warring one, but you would have been blocked as well, most likely. I have warned the IP. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
-
Dejan Lazović (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Igor Porobić (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
-
Prison island (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Fascist Italy
-
Uroš Čučković (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Montenegrin
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of mountains in Montenegro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Volujak ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
== Just copy the source code and paste it on the talk page of the user you wish to invite.
|
| This user has been invited WikiProject Prussia please consider checking us out. |
==
Is a strong claim and must be really proven. A twit will not do. Current events are the biggest protests in modern history of Montenegro and they have a proper place in the article. If you have any further concerns - take them to the TP for once. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- road blocks were susbituted by peaceful church gatherings (litije) and nonviolent walks, the said priest was not harmed and you are inserting fake news. please stop stalking me Road blocks are a fact and yet you removed that part with some unfortunate summary. Why? Attacks on several priests also took place (if they were not badly harmed is not important!). This is a POV pushing, not any constructive editing and most probably Wikipedia:I just don't like it. You did not give any proof or explained that they are fake news. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 12:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, they are not the biggest protests, as there were many anti-govt protest similar or larger in size. And I never said they should not be mentioned, but that there is no place for your essays and frivolous claims based on sources such as the pitiful Blic tabloid. On the other hand, I do not feel the need to discuss with a well known disruptive ultranationalist editor, due to glaringly obvious lack of good faith in your activity on almost all Montenegro-related articles. I hope that you find another hobby other than stalking and reverting my edits, and I would kindly ask you to leave my talk page alone. Feel free to discuss your problems on article talk pages, however.
Sideshow Bob 12:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- You presented no arguments, only some insults. No matter. I do not appreciate being labeled (ultra-whatever). Maybe that is considered normal in your tiny little divided country, but in the rest of the world - it's not. My hobby is just fine and I shall try to find even more time for it... voljno, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:10, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- No, they are not the biggest protests, as there were many anti-govt protest similar or larger in size. And I never said they should not be mentioned, but that there is no place for your essays and frivolous claims based on sources such as the pitiful Blic tabloid. On the other hand, I do not feel the need to discuss with a well known disruptive ultranationalist editor, due to glaringly obvious lack of good faith in your activity on almost all Montenegro-related articles. I hope that you find another hobby other than stalking and reverting my edits, and I would kindly ask you to leave my talk page alone. Feel free to discuss your problems on article talk pages, however.
Sideshow Bob 12:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have not insulted anyone, just stated the truth - the entire point of your activity on this website is tireless promotion of Serbian nationalism, end of. Regarding the article, I simply corrected some untrue claims, leaving most of your edit as it was. I do not care for your feelings, you can be butthurt all you want, I also do not care how you feel about my country, so you can jog on.
Sideshow Bob 13:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- You see what you want to see. Nice language, for a kafana. No arguments presented, no diffs, zero. Nobody can be hurt by wild claims and uncivil behaviour, such moments can only describe the author of such silly claims in the best way imagined. On the other hand, my comment on modern-day MNE is per facts presented on Wikipedia (size, population, economy, the fact that Montenegrins make less than 50% percent on the population). It is nothing personal, unlike your claims and labels ( Wikipedia:Civility). Any further labels will be reported without hesitation. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:31, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have not insulted anyone, just stated the truth - the entire point of your activity on this website is tireless promotion of Serbian nationalism, end of. Regarding the article, I simply corrected some untrue claims, leaving most of your edit as it was. I do not care for your feelings, you can be butthurt all you want, I also do not care how you feel about my country, so you can jog on.
Sideshow Bob 13:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
On your bike! Sideshow Bob 13:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Take a look and post a comment - [1]. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 15:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- The DRN at WP:DRN#Montenegro is waiting for your further input, and risks being closed, per the comment there by User:Nightenbelle. I hope you will consider rejoining the discussion. Presumably the recent edit by User:Sadko, which adds a 'See also' to 2019–20 Montenegrin crisis, may address some of your concerns about undue weight in the main Montenegro article. The issues on quality of sources and neutrality still remain to be settled. These questions could be reviewed at DRN. For example you could try to use DRN to agree on the wording of an RfC and then transfer the matter back to the article talk page. You have made reference to 'fake news' and 'ongoing obsession of this particular user with my Wikipedia activity' which may suggest that not everyone is completely calm. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Forca logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 04:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SDP Montenegro logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Mladost Ljeskopolje.png has been orphaned
I've removed this image from FK Podgorica as they updated their logo. This makes the image orphaned, and per WP:NFCC the image is subject to deletion in seven days. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 20:55, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dnpcg-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 20:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dua-udsh.logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 18:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Albanskaalternativa-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion ( talk / contribs) 19:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenjo Janković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Public holidays in Yugoslavia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:V and WP:GNG There are no references, my search for references did not find any WP:RS. The two other language articles have similar content and no reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jeepday (
talk) 18:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hsp starcevic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced or remove sourced content, as you did at
Crnojević noble family you may be
blocked from editing.
Theonewithreason (
talk) 08:28 06.June 2022 (UTC)
- You're the one being disruptive. Try adding some reason to your edits for change, and leave me alone. I just added a tag to notify readers of a load of unsourced horseshit in that article, and you are the one intentionally defending the false information. On your bike then. Sideshow Bob 08:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring.
Theonewithreason (
talk) 08:49 07.June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Demokratska Crna Gora logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
The article FK Partizan Momišići has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Chidgk1 (
talk) 06:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The article, FK Partizan Momišići, has been nominated for deletion. You may comment on the nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Partizan Momišići JoeNMLC ( talk) 20:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dscg-ldmz-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montenegrin Third League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Piperi and Zelenika.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)