Hello!
I'm very new to Wikipedia so I am hoping I'm doing this right! I found your page through the deletion of the page for songwriter, Jenna Andrews.
I believe someone had flagged it for sock puppetry; however, this claim was unsupported as there are numerous sources to credit her success as a songwriter. These sources include All Music and respective artists' wikipedia's and all music whom she has worked with and written for. For example, Noah Cyrus - Stay Together .
I have worked with Jenna before and simply attempted to make an edit to better highlight her career as a songwriter, but did not intend to cause any reason for deletion! Was unaware of the previous editing history that occurred on this page. Happy to discuss further if you'd like and provide more sources if need be.
Sydneyjacobs ( talk) 19:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)sydneyjacobs
Please restore World Roller Hockey League to my sandbox. Trackinfo ( talk) 20:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with
Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.Hi Premeditated Chaos. The just created Billy Quinncroft popped up on my watchlist, and normally that only happens when a previous version of an article which was on watchilist hase been resurrected from the dead. Anyway, it appears that you deleted an article with the same name back February 2017, but I'm not sure if ithis latest incarnation is the same or different. The editor who created this latest version is a new account whose only visible edit is the creation of this article; moreover, their user talk has yet to be created, so there's no way to know if they were involved in the previous version. Anyway, I understand that prod-deleted stuff may be recreated, so I am wondering it if might be better to move this to the draft namespace before it gets tagged for CSD or BLP Prod in order to give the creator some time to work on it. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:59, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I totally misunderstood a previous suggestion about MfD. Self-whale... for when a trout just isn't enough. Atsme 📞 📧 09:43, July 7, 2017
I see that you changed page protection for List of Bear in the Big Blue House episodes. Could you also do that for Bear in the Big Blue House as pretty much all of the edits there are vandalism as well? Adamtt9 ( talk) 17:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Yuck. Persistent. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi
Hope your well please do not revert the bawab article as it is relevant informatio, since the Egyptian Revolution the "bawabs" have committed many crimes and made people feel unsafe. This murder was particular unsavoury but not unusual. The bawab usually is a unwanted law to themselves that will harrass, intimidate, steal electric, water and gas and have a large criminal record and also poison feral dogs and cats. It's of particular interest that people are very wary of them and cautious, both foreginers and Egyptians. Source: Ongoing Experience here in Egypt
Hi
I would like to request that the article Global Reports on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE) be undeleted. It was deleted due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Here is a list of relaible third party sources for the article I would be happy to include as references if the article is undeleted.
Many thanks
-- John Cummings ( talk) 13:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, would you like to add Pinargözü Cave to the list in Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey) ? Nedim Ardoğa ( talk) 15:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you please explain your reasoning for closing the AFD for The Freddy Awards as a delete? It would seem to me that, since no further votes or discussion was generated after was relisted twice to generate a clearer consensus, it should have been closed as a No Consensus rather than a Delete. And I know there were technically two delete votes and only one keep vote, but I'd submit that the two delete votes were rather weaker arguments (one even acknowledged itself as a weak vote) and the AFD guidelines specify that the debate is the not a vote. Not trying to complain, but I was interested in your reasoning? — Hun ter Ka hn 20:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
I saw you self reverted - think the protection crossed your edit. Your commentary, if you still want to place it, can certainly be added to that page's talk. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 13:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Why you have removed my page? Scype! (Unsigned comment by Kamervishi moved from the talk page of one of my personal sub-pages to here)
Hey, PC. Just giving you a heads up about that I created a request for reinstatement of James Carter IV over on WP:UNDELETE. I would argue strongly against the delete being uncontroversial; due to the quick action on PRODs, neither I nor any other contributors to the article had a chance to argue against the proposal, and I think it would have been handled much more effectively at WP:AFD. Cheers. Rockhead126 ( talk) 04:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. May you please undelete just Talk:Getting It (film) (not Getting It (film))? It should be considered G8-exempt. Thanks. -- George Ho ( talk) 15:28, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
People had already objected to deletion at the Deletion Review. Therefor it was not an uncontested deletion to be removed by Prod--it needs to go to afd. Please undelete and send it. Of course, since it was just a prod, I can do it msyelf. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi there,
I would like to request the un-deletion of the page "Eric Berkowitz" due to, "Promotional articles with clear promotional-like content in the information and sources, none of which give better convincing substance for notability."
Here is a list of additional sources I would like to include if the page could be un-deleted:
Advertising Week Getting It Made Humble Acquires Paranoid US Launches Sister Shop Postal AICP Member Directory Singtrix Guitar Hero Webby Award Winners Humble Champions A Force For Good Advertising Week AICP Panel Humble TV Limited Liability Company Adverts Handle With Care Stuff We Love - Gillette Takes Cannes
Many Thanks.
Rh118 ( talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pınargözü Cave, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at over 10 km (6 mi), Pınargözü Cave is the longest cave in Turkey but has not yet been fully surveyed? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Pınargözü Cave), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Premeditated Chaos, I here by request you to unprotect the page Zebronics from creation. This is a one of the most known organisation in India as you can check it with GOOGLE searches, so kindly un protect it and give good editors from India a chance to create a page on that topic. Thanks and Good Bless ( Ayushmanbhava ( talk))
On 29 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Lee Burns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Lee Burns, a reformed convict from Oregon, was the subject of an interstate extradition battle between Oregon and California? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Lee Burns. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Robert Lee Burns), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I see you've raised concerns about me... I appeared on wikipedia to correct what I thought of being dodgy in here, pretty much like SubRE done but after admins talked me into correcting articles I have done so. I crossed Phase as I was browsing Anathema's page and then checked Asouko's edits and logged in and tried and revert the edits unsuccessfully. And it ended up being some sort of Vendeta. I don't know what's wrong in that really. MusicPatrol ( talk) 11:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For your excellent work in draft space: it's an area I generally stay away from, but on the odd occasion I wander there I am always impressed with your work to keep our encyclopedia clean and an encyclopedia. TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
On 4 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rabbitkettle Hot Springs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rabbitkettle Hot Springs in the Northwest Territories are both the largest tufa mounds in Canada and the only known tufa mounds on permafrost? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rabbitkettle Hot Springs. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rabbitkettle Hot Springs), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi PC I see that you deleted our company page from Wikipedia Lightbox Ventures
www.lightbox.vc
Is there any thing i can do to get it back?
We're a venture capital firm based in Mumbai, India. Our portfolio companies include some of the most respected tech companies in India. 08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)~~
I took a lot of trouble to put that page together and would really appreciate your help in building it back
Thank you
Tina Trm5y ( talk) 08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi again PMC, thanks for your help with the UC San Diego Medical Center, Hillcrest article. I'm hoping to do the same thing with my article at User:TritonsRising/sandbox/Jacobs Medical Center draft, in which the draft is moved to the article namespace to replace the redirect currently at Jacobs Medical Center. Please let me know how you can help me out or ping me when this is done! Thanks! TritonsRising (talk) 20:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I kindly request you to undelete "Harvard Crimson men's squash".
I did not mean to add biased information. I was only trying to start new pages about college squash just to add more valuable information about squash to Wikipedia. Please understand that I am new to this and spent many hours creating these pages. All those hours will go to waste.
Can you also let me know what was wrong so I can improve? I did not mean to vandalize at all. Would you like to help me recreate them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildkangaroo89 ( talk • contribs) 03:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildkangaroo89 ( talk • contribs) 03:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say hi to a fellow Wikipedian from Vancouver. Regards, Alex Shih Talk 15:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi I created a page that is nominated for deletion,every reference I used was remove, I believe some of them were very accurate and reliable references and the page is of a notable Tv person with a list of credits . Can you please help in keep this page up? I would appreciate the help. Am not perfect with Wikipedia but getting better.. Thanks Manunited20 (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
It was kind of funny that you deleted Kodak Black (aka Kodak Black) from List of Haitians because he had no Wikipedia article. His article gets over a million views per year and he's a hugely popular rapper (when he's not locked up). I delete his name from that list all the time because he was born in Florida. Most important, had I not written his Wikipedia article, I wouldn't have a clue who he was either. Cheers. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Your closure deletion on material on my user page was unclear, therefore I reopened it. Please note that your assertion that the draft in question has not been improved is untrue as was each assertion of the other editors who commented. Thank you. Johnvr4 ( talk) 15:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I hope i'm doing this correctly... I'd like to discuss the deletion of the BMC_Control-M page. If it was deleted due to some outdated information i'd be happy to adopt this page and work on improving it.
In your deletion reason you also mention that 'the concept itself is not significant enough to warrant an article.', the page List_of_job_scheduler_software lists many such similar products and many of them have their own page. Control-M is one of, if not the market leader in workload automation tools and its use globally is huge.
Cheers!
Note: The only way that i'm affiliated with Control-M is that I've been using it daily for my work for the past 6 years. Joobear ( talk) 20:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah ( talk) 20:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted the page per WP:U5 and closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ResonX/sandbox. Just a note that I did not nominate this for speedy deletion/speedy delete the page because the user has actually made many contributions to Wikipedia, so WP:U5 is inapplicable. See the users contributions for more information. North America 1000 06:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Johnvr4/sandbox, User:Johnvr4/sandbox4, User:Johnvr4/Operation Red Hat. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Johnvr4 ( talk) 20:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
You were very prompt on that one. Thanks.
It was only after I had filed the MfD that I went to the user's talk page and discovered that a slightly different version of this article had already been deleted once (or possibly twice) via AfD. I was attempting to add this information to the MfD, but got a conflicted edit with your close. So my apologies for suggesting a CSD G4 so soon after you did your work. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 06:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
On 2 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Auesee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artificial lake Auesee (pictured) has become a popular recreation spot known as the "jewel" of Wesel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Auesee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Auesee), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed you delete Written in the Scars to make way for an uncontroversial move. However, as the subject of an RfD which several editors including myself was opposed to deletion/moving, it was controversial. When the CSD was requested by Boleyn, myself and AngusWoof had commented on the talk page saying it was controversial and shouldn't be deleted. Probably an oversight, you deleted the page ignoring the talk page content and moved Written in the Scars (The Script song) to Written in the Scars. As the creator of both redirects, the page history prior to deletion was significant to me. I'd like to ask you to please undo the controversial move and restore page history of Written in the Scars before it was deleted, in order to preserve attribution. Thank you. — Za wl 09:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Premeditated Chaos. I stumbled across Abdullah Azam Khan while checking on something unrelated and noticed from its talk page that the article had been previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Azam Khan. Is this recreation OK or should it be deleted per WP:G4. FWIW, the creator of the latest version did not participate in the AfD and I cannot see the article history of the deleted version to tell whether they were involved in that. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello there.
I'm new to editing Wikipedia despite registering my username a long time ago, so I'm probably formatting even this message incorrectly - but I'm doing my best. I have long been in the habit of referring to the above page which you have apparently recently deleted. I can't link to it because, well, it's deleted? The best I can do is to link to the Talk Page regarding its deletion, so I hope this is good enough: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Latin_phrases_in_A_Canticle_for_Leibowitz.
I have read the debate on the Talk Page as to why it was deleted, and while I am aware that the page did not meet Wikipedia's standards regarding sourcing etc., as indeed many other live pages do not, I would argue that deleting such a page, very useful and extremely difficult to re-create as it is, on this basis (and because the novel itself is apparently considered "trivial", which is the opposite of the typical academic view?) does seem rather drastic, rather than, say, leaving the page as it was, with the "not up to standard" warnings in place (and in the hope of it being improved?).
This page was a unique reference source, more of a necessity than merely a "nicety" if the reader (even the highly educated reader) is correctly to understand the book it refers to. The page supported a book that is regarded, certainly in the UK, as a truly great classic novel of the 20th Century (absolutely not a "barely notable novel" (I have not heard it described thus in over four decades?) - conversely, it is usually considered as being highly influential and even comparable to 'Brave New World', for example; it is, indeed, sometimes mistaken for a solely/primarily religious work when it is actually a major work on many other levels than its ecclesiastical backdrop/partial theme may indicate: primarily dystopian sci-fi, complex psychology, and (the author's suggestion of) a recurrent self-destructive human paradigm). The novel itself is in the category of "material for PhD theses" rather than "light reading", and its usage of Latin is extremely complex and integral to understanding it; this is far from my own personal view.
The usage of Latin in the novel is much beyond the simple translation of English into Latin, or even into ecclesiastical Latin; it is considerable in extent and notable in context, and is far more subtle and ingenious than a cursory reading suggests, making reference also to historical figures, making ironical usage of normally common ecclesiastical phrases, etc. The user who contributed to the discussion named Rwflammang is entirely correct in his/her stated view, and I will simply quote him/her because I can't put it any better myself: "The meaning of the phrases used in this classic adds much to a deeper understanding of it. The criticism that much is unsourced, however valid it may be, can be easily remedied by the addition of sources, while, on the other hand, sources cannot be added to a non-existent article. The notion that Google translate could replace this article is ludicrous. The rich layers of liturgical, biblical, and classical allusion in this article cannot be explained by any machine translation.".
Please would you kindly consider restoring this formerly very useful page, which I can find mirrored on no other live site? I now have to resort to the Wayback Machine in order to consult this page, and even though I have a decent grounding in Classics myself and have read the novel many times as well, my knowledge of both Latin and the highly significant manner in which the book's author used the various Latin phrases he chose to employ is far too inferior for me (for example) even to try to recreate this page myself.
Many thanks for your consideration, and apologies again for the (no doubt many) errors in this message's formatting. Nell Smith 09:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
As I indicated in the AFD, I do intend to recreate Delta Sigma Rho as a redirect to Delta Sigma Rho/Tau Kappa Alpha which will be an article about the second group referenced in the original page. This organization, unlike the one at Vassar originally mentioned is a National Forensics Honorary ( http://www.dsr-tka.org/). Just wanted you to know as deleting admin. Naraht ( talk) 10:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please restore Joshua Shemer ? I have supporting references to reliable sources that directly supports material in this article, and I will update them when you will restore the article. Thanks!
may i know the reason why my page will be deleted please inform me thank you
I removed the prod tag you placed on Tom Cranston as the individual passes WP:BIO. All the best. Bobo . 11:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Q1: How is this guideline related to the general notability guideline? A1: The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline. They are intended only to stop an article from being quickly deleted when there is very strong reason to believe that significant, independent, non-routine, non-promotional secondary coverage from reliable sources are available, given sufficient time to locate them. Wikipedia's standard for including an article about a given person is not based on whether or not he/she has attained certain achievements, but on whether or not the person has received appropriate coverage in reliable sources, in accordance with the general notability guideline. Also refer to Wikipedia's basic guidance on the notability of people for additional information on evaluating notability.
Maybe it's just me but I don't see that as contradictory. All it's saying is to follow the instructions on the relevant page. Some of the SNGs, like NPROF, are specifically exempt from the GNG. Some, like NSPORTS, don't - they just provide guidelines so you can tell where someone is likely to have GNG-worthy sources and shouldn't be speedied.
Anyway, I put it to AfD (I'm sure you got the talk page template but just in case) so we'll see how the community feels about my reasoning. For what it's worth, I have been proven spectacularly wrong before with sports bios and GNG before. I recently nominated Frédéric Boniface for AfD having done what I thought was a fairly strong WP:BEFORE, but even still I had people turn up and WP:HEYMANN the living bejeesus out of it. It's entirely possible that there are sources out there for Cranston that I couldn't find that will get brought up in an AfD.
(And for what it's worth I apologize for being bitchy initially. I shouldn't have been snotty with my original comment.) ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
The reason I removed the page number, in
this edit is that normally when someone uses |pages=347
, it's a mistaken attempt to indicate that the book has 347 pages, not that the information is found on page 347. That's all.
Imzadi 1979
→ 02:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
I'm very new to Wikipedia so I am hoping I'm doing this right! I found your page through the deletion of the page for songwriter, Jenna Andrews.
I believe someone had flagged it for sock puppetry; however, this claim was unsupported as there are numerous sources to credit her success as a songwriter. These sources include All Music and respective artists' wikipedia's and all music whom she has worked with and written for. For example, Noah Cyrus - Stay Together .
I have worked with Jenna before and simply attempted to make an edit to better highlight her career as a songwriter, but did not intend to cause any reason for deletion! Was unaware of the previous editing history that occurred on this page. Happy to discuss further if you'd like and provide more sources if need be.
Sydneyjacobs ( talk) 19:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)sydneyjacobs
Please restore World Roller Hockey League to my sandbox. Trackinfo ( talk) 20:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with
Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.Hi Premeditated Chaos. The just created Billy Quinncroft popped up on my watchlist, and normally that only happens when a previous version of an article which was on watchilist hase been resurrected from the dead. Anyway, it appears that you deleted an article with the same name back February 2017, but I'm not sure if ithis latest incarnation is the same or different. The editor who created this latest version is a new account whose only visible edit is the creation of this article; moreover, their user talk has yet to be created, so there's no way to know if they were involved in the previous version. Anyway, I understand that prod-deleted stuff may be recreated, so I am wondering it if might be better to move this to the draft namespace before it gets tagged for CSD or BLP Prod in order to give the creator some time to work on it. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:59, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
I totally misunderstood a previous suggestion about MfD. Self-whale... for when a trout just isn't enough. Atsme 📞 📧 09:43, July 7, 2017
I see that you changed page protection for List of Bear in the Big Blue House episodes. Could you also do that for Bear in the Big Blue House as pretty much all of the edits there are vandalism as well? Adamtt9 ( talk) 17:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Yuck. Persistent. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:45, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi
Hope your well please do not revert the bawab article as it is relevant informatio, since the Egyptian Revolution the "bawabs" have committed many crimes and made people feel unsafe. This murder was particular unsavoury but not unusual. The bawab usually is a unwanted law to themselves that will harrass, intimidate, steal electric, water and gas and have a large criminal record and also poison feral dogs and cats. It's of particular interest that people are very wary of them and cautious, both foreginers and Egyptians. Source: Ongoing Experience here in Egypt
Hi
I would like to request that the article Global Reports on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE) be undeleted. It was deleted due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Here is a list of relaible third party sources for the article I would be happy to include as references if the article is undeleted.
Many thanks
-- John Cummings ( talk) 13:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, would you like to add Pinargözü Cave to the list in Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey) ? Nedim Ardoğa ( talk) 15:45, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Can you please explain your reasoning for closing the AFD for The Freddy Awards as a delete? It would seem to me that, since no further votes or discussion was generated after was relisted twice to generate a clearer consensus, it should have been closed as a No Consensus rather than a Delete. And I know there were technically two delete votes and only one keep vote, but I'd submit that the two delete votes were rather weaker arguments (one even acknowledged itself as a weak vote) and the AFD guidelines specify that the debate is the not a vote. Not trying to complain, but I was interested in your reasoning? — Hun ter Ka hn 20:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
I saw you self reverted - think the protection crossed your edit. Your commentary, if you still want to place it, can certainly be added to that page's talk. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 13:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Why you have removed my page? Scype! (Unsigned comment by Kamervishi moved from the talk page of one of my personal sub-pages to here)
Hey, PC. Just giving you a heads up about that I created a request for reinstatement of James Carter IV over on WP:UNDELETE. I would argue strongly against the delete being uncontroversial; due to the quick action on PRODs, neither I nor any other contributors to the article had a chance to argue against the proposal, and I think it would have been handled much more effectively at WP:AFD. Cheers. Rockhead126 ( talk) 04:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello. May you please undelete just Talk:Getting It (film) (not Getting It (film))? It should be considered G8-exempt. Thanks. -- George Ho ( talk) 15:28, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
People had already objected to deletion at the Deletion Review. Therefor it was not an uncontested deletion to be removed by Prod--it needs to go to afd. Please undelete and send it. Of course, since it was just a prod, I can do it msyelf. DGG ( talk ) 23:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi there,
I would like to request the un-deletion of the page "Eric Berkowitz" due to, "Promotional articles with clear promotional-like content in the information and sources, none of which give better convincing substance for notability."
Here is a list of additional sources I would like to include if the page could be un-deleted:
Advertising Week Getting It Made Humble Acquires Paranoid US Launches Sister Shop Postal AICP Member Directory Singtrix Guitar Hero Webby Award Winners Humble Champions A Force For Good Advertising Week AICP Panel Humble TV Limited Liability Company Adverts Handle With Care Stuff We Love - Gillette Takes Cannes
Many Thanks.
Rh118 ( talk) 19:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pınargözü Cave, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at over 10 km (6 mi), Pınargözü Cave is the longest cave in Turkey but has not yet been fully surveyed? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Pınargözü Cave), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Premeditated Chaos, I here by request you to unprotect the page Zebronics from creation. This is a one of the most known organisation in India as you can check it with GOOGLE searches, so kindly un protect it and give good editors from India a chance to create a page on that topic. Thanks and Good Bless ( Ayushmanbhava ( talk))
On 29 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Lee Burns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Lee Burns, a reformed convict from Oregon, was the subject of an interstate extradition battle between Oregon and California? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Lee Burns. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Robert Lee Burns), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I see you've raised concerns about me... I appeared on wikipedia to correct what I thought of being dodgy in here, pretty much like SubRE done but after admins talked me into correcting articles I have done so. I crossed Phase as I was browsing Anathema's page and then checked Asouko's edits and logged in and tried and revert the edits unsuccessfully. And it ended up being some sort of Vendeta. I don't know what's wrong in that really. MusicPatrol ( talk) 11:34, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | |
For your excellent work in draft space: it's an area I generally stay away from, but on the odd occasion I wander there I am always impressed with your work to keep our encyclopedia clean and an encyclopedia. TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
On 4 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rabbitkettle Hot Springs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rabbitkettle Hot Springs in the Northwest Territories are both the largest tufa mounds in Canada and the only known tufa mounds on permafrost? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rabbitkettle Hot Springs. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rabbitkettle Hot Springs), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi PC I see that you deleted our company page from Wikipedia Lightbox Ventures
www.lightbox.vc
Is there any thing i can do to get it back?
We're a venture capital firm based in Mumbai, India. Our portfolio companies include some of the most respected tech companies in India. 08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)~~
I took a lot of trouble to put that page together and would really appreciate your help in building it back
Thank you
Tina Trm5y ( talk) 08:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi again PMC, thanks for your help with the UC San Diego Medical Center, Hillcrest article. I'm hoping to do the same thing with my article at User:TritonsRising/sandbox/Jacobs Medical Center draft, in which the draft is moved to the article namespace to replace the redirect currently at Jacobs Medical Center. Please let me know how you can help me out or ping me when this is done! Thanks! TritonsRising (talk) 20:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I kindly request you to undelete "Harvard Crimson men's squash".
I did not mean to add biased information. I was only trying to start new pages about college squash just to add more valuable information about squash to Wikipedia. Please understand that I am new to this and spent many hours creating these pages. All those hours will go to waste.
Can you also let me know what was wrong so I can improve? I did not mean to vandalize at all. Would you like to help me recreate them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildkangaroo89 ( talk • contribs) 03:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks and have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildkangaroo89 ( talk • contribs) 03:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Just dropping by to say hi to a fellow Wikipedian from Vancouver. Regards, Alex Shih Talk 15:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi I created a page that is nominated for deletion,every reference I used was remove, I believe some of them were very accurate and reliable references and the page is of a notable Tv person with a list of credits . Can you please help in keep this page up? I would appreciate the help. Am not perfect with Wikipedia but getting better.. Thanks Manunited20 (talk) 21:33, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
It was kind of funny that you deleted Kodak Black (aka Kodak Black) from List of Haitians because he had no Wikipedia article. His article gets over a million views per year and he's a hugely popular rapper (when he's not locked up). I delete his name from that list all the time because he was born in Florida. Most important, had I not written his Wikipedia article, I wouldn't have a clue who he was either. Cheers. Magnolia677 ( talk) 00:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Your closure deletion on material on my user page was unclear, therefore I reopened it. Please note that your assertion that the draft in question has not been improved is untrue as was each assertion of the other editors who commented. Thank you. Johnvr4 ( talk) 15:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I hope i'm doing this correctly... I'd like to discuss the deletion of the BMC_Control-M page. If it was deleted due to some outdated information i'd be happy to adopt this page and work on improving it.
In your deletion reason you also mention that 'the concept itself is not significant enough to warrant an article.', the page List_of_job_scheduler_software lists many such similar products and many of them have their own page. Control-M is one of, if not the market leader in workload automation tools and its use globally is huge.
Cheers!
Note: The only way that i'm affiliated with Control-M is that I've been using it daily for my work for the past 6 years. Joobear ( talk) 20:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah ( talk) 20:48, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted the page per WP:U5 and closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ResonX/sandbox. Just a note that I did not nominate this for speedy deletion/speedy delete the page because the user has actually made many contributions to Wikipedia, so WP:U5 is inapplicable. See the users contributions for more information. North America 1000 06:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Johnvr4/sandbox, User:Johnvr4/sandbox4, User:Johnvr4/Operation Red Hat. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Johnvr4 ( talk) 20:58, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
You were very prompt on that one. Thanks.
It was only after I had filed the MfD that I went to the user's talk page and discovered that a slightly different version of this article had already been deleted once (or possibly twice) via AfD. I was attempting to add this information to the MfD, but got a conflicted edit with your close. So my apologies for suggesting a CSD G4 so soon after you did your work. — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 06:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
On 2 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Auesee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artificial lake Auesee (pictured) has become a popular recreation spot known as the "jewel" of Wesel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Auesee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Auesee), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
I noticed you delete Written in the Scars to make way for an uncontroversial move. However, as the subject of an RfD which several editors including myself was opposed to deletion/moving, it was controversial. When the CSD was requested by Boleyn, myself and AngusWoof had commented on the talk page saying it was controversial and shouldn't be deleted. Probably an oversight, you deleted the page ignoring the talk page content and moved Written in the Scars (The Script song) to Written in the Scars. As the creator of both redirects, the page history prior to deletion was significant to me. I'd like to ask you to please undo the controversial move and restore page history of Written in the Scars before it was deleted, in order to preserve attribution. Thank you. — Za wl 09:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Premeditated Chaos. I stumbled across Abdullah Azam Khan while checking on something unrelated and noticed from its talk page that the article had been previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Azam Khan. Is this recreation OK or should it be deleted per WP:G4. FWIW, the creator of the latest version did not participate in the AfD and I cannot see the article history of the deleted version to tell whether they were involved in that. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 06:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello there.
I'm new to editing Wikipedia despite registering my username a long time ago, so I'm probably formatting even this message incorrectly - but I'm doing my best. I have long been in the habit of referring to the above page which you have apparently recently deleted. I can't link to it because, well, it's deleted? The best I can do is to link to the Talk Page regarding its deletion, so I hope this is good enough: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Latin_phrases_in_A_Canticle_for_Leibowitz.
I have read the debate on the Talk Page as to why it was deleted, and while I am aware that the page did not meet Wikipedia's standards regarding sourcing etc., as indeed many other live pages do not, I would argue that deleting such a page, very useful and extremely difficult to re-create as it is, on this basis (and because the novel itself is apparently considered "trivial", which is the opposite of the typical academic view?) does seem rather drastic, rather than, say, leaving the page as it was, with the "not up to standard" warnings in place (and in the hope of it being improved?).
This page was a unique reference source, more of a necessity than merely a "nicety" if the reader (even the highly educated reader) is correctly to understand the book it refers to. The page supported a book that is regarded, certainly in the UK, as a truly great classic novel of the 20th Century (absolutely not a "barely notable novel" (I have not heard it described thus in over four decades?) - conversely, it is usually considered as being highly influential and even comparable to 'Brave New World', for example; it is, indeed, sometimes mistaken for a solely/primarily religious work when it is actually a major work on many other levels than its ecclesiastical backdrop/partial theme may indicate: primarily dystopian sci-fi, complex psychology, and (the author's suggestion of) a recurrent self-destructive human paradigm). The novel itself is in the category of "material for PhD theses" rather than "light reading", and its usage of Latin is extremely complex and integral to understanding it; this is far from my own personal view.
The usage of Latin in the novel is much beyond the simple translation of English into Latin, or even into ecclesiastical Latin; it is considerable in extent and notable in context, and is far more subtle and ingenious than a cursory reading suggests, making reference also to historical figures, making ironical usage of normally common ecclesiastical phrases, etc. The user who contributed to the discussion named Rwflammang is entirely correct in his/her stated view, and I will simply quote him/her because I can't put it any better myself: "The meaning of the phrases used in this classic adds much to a deeper understanding of it. The criticism that much is unsourced, however valid it may be, can be easily remedied by the addition of sources, while, on the other hand, sources cannot be added to a non-existent article. The notion that Google translate could replace this article is ludicrous. The rich layers of liturgical, biblical, and classical allusion in this article cannot be explained by any machine translation.".
Please would you kindly consider restoring this formerly very useful page, which I can find mirrored on no other live site? I now have to resort to the Wayback Machine in order to consult this page, and even though I have a decent grounding in Classics myself and have read the novel many times as well, my knowledge of both Latin and the highly significant manner in which the book's author used the various Latin phrases he chose to employ is far too inferior for me (for example) even to try to recreate this page myself.
Many thanks for your consideration, and apologies again for the (no doubt many) errors in this message's formatting. Nell Smith 09:46, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
As I indicated in the AFD, I do intend to recreate Delta Sigma Rho as a redirect to Delta Sigma Rho/Tau Kappa Alpha which will be an article about the second group referenced in the original page. This organization, unlike the one at Vassar originally mentioned is a National Forensics Honorary ( http://www.dsr-tka.org/). Just wanted you to know as deleting admin. Naraht ( talk) 10:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Can you please restore Joshua Shemer ? I have supporting references to reliable sources that directly supports material in this article, and I will update them when you will restore the article. Thanks!
may i know the reason why my page will be deleted please inform me thank you
I removed the prod tag you placed on Tom Cranston as the individual passes WP:BIO. All the best. Bobo . 11:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Q1: How is this guideline related to the general notability guideline? A1: The topic-specific notability guidelines described on this page do not replace the general notability guideline. They are intended only to stop an article from being quickly deleted when there is very strong reason to believe that significant, independent, non-routine, non-promotional secondary coverage from reliable sources are available, given sufficient time to locate them. Wikipedia's standard for including an article about a given person is not based on whether or not he/she has attained certain achievements, but on whether or not the person has received appropriate coverage in reliable sources, in accordance with the general notability guideline. Also refer to Wikipedia's basic guidance on the notability of people for additional information on evaluating notability.
Maybe it's just me but I don't see that as contradictory. All it's saying is to follow the instructions on the relevant page. Some of the SNGs, like NPROF, are specifically exempt from the GNG. Some, like NSPORTS, don't - they just provide guidelines so you can tell where someone is likely to have GNG-worthy sources and shouldn't be speedied.
Anyway, I put it to AfD (I'm sure you got the talk page template but just in case) so we'll see how the community feels about my reasoning. For what it's worth, I have been proven spectacularly wrong before with sports bios and GNG before. I recently nominated Frédéric Boniface for AfD having done what I thought was a fairly strong WP:BEFORE, but even still I had people turn up and WP:HEYMANN the living bejeesus out of it. It's entirely possible that there are sources out there for Cranston that I couldn't find that will get brought up in an AfD.
(And for what it's worth I apologize for being bitchy initially. I shouldn't have been snotty with my original comment.) ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
The reason I removed the page number, in
this edit is that normally when someone uses |pages=347
, it's a mistaken attempt to indicate that the book has 347 pages, not that the information is found on page 347. That's all.
Imzadi 1979
→ 02:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)