This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Happy New Year! | ||
Hey there, PeterSymonds! Happy new
Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;)
Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. |
Many thanks for your comments! Fair use is reasonable as probably all other logos are copyright. The english wiki is particularly aggressive as exhibited by the image's 3 year survival on the german wiki. Would making a direct link from the english to the german image be appropriate? My tentative attempt can be found in the info box University of Zimbabwe. Part ( talk) 13:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Please help - HAPPY 2009.
Dear PeterSymonds,
Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.
Kind regards,
Majorly talk 21:34, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
Just wondering why you deleted the Wonder Book and Video page, an independent book video store when things like Blockbuster, Barnes/Noble, Amazon etc remain as entries? I don't remember the entry but I believe it had a history of the store. What advertising was posted? If someone posted "blatant advertising" wouldn't it be better to just delete that portion of the entry? [ [1]]
Thanks. Blindzero ( talk) 21:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Since the entry was written by someone outside of the company to begin with and was deleted, is it possible to to fast track a request for the entry to be readded? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
76.100.218.134 (
talk) 04:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:DougsTech. You were the one to remove DougsTech's rollback access in August, so you might be able to add some thoughts there. Thanks, either way ( talk) 23:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Rather than take up a deletion review, the editor you explained deletion review to, on Julian Colton's page, has simply recreated the article, again witrh no sources. What's the next step? Who should take it? I'm trying to avoid drama. My first instinct was to blank the page and leave the editor a snotty note. So clearly I'm off balance on this. Would you please look into this and come up with, or at least suggest, a better approach than my first instinct. David in DC ( talk) 12:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thans so much for protecting the page I requested. I know it's not the best or most important article, but I just saw so much vandalism on that page. Thanks again, Bbhinton15 ( talk) 20:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for 'noindexing' the old page.
To answer your question on the border, I want it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Astral_highway
Someone put a COI tag on the Chemetco page and it's been suggested to me that it may alleviate people's fears if I disclose the nature of my relationship to this subject. I've now done this, but it's important that people actually notice it. (Actually, on this matter, should I move this to the Chemetco talk page instead? What do you think?)
To make this stand out, I wanted to include a border and light, translucent background. So it's not the main Wikipedia space, just part of my page.
Astral highway ( talk) 11:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Peace | ||
Hey, I meant to post this a long time ago, especially after that whole Catherine Deneuve incident. I just wanted to award you the Barnstar of Peace, given how peacefully you seem to resolve conflicts. Take care. Luke4545 ( talk) 20:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
I spent a miserable hour at CSD earlier today, with just about no help, deleting - though it beggars belief - G1's and G10's that were a few hours old and G12's and blatant A7's from 5-8 hours before. Sometimes this feels like an uphill battle and Wikipedia needs you back with +sysop. You know how active you were with the toolkit, and we've lost a lot of active people recently. Please think about asking for the bit back rather soon. As I've said before you can guarantee my nomination. Pedro : Chat 20:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
how do you place a template at your talk page's edit page? please tell me at my talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dont bite neutrals! ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
User:PeterSymonds/Archive 14 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for seeing to the changes to the UK Copyright article. Any idea about the user's status? Orthorhombic ( talk) 09:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad you changed your mind and decided to run again, Wikipedia will be better when you get the tools back. Unfortunately, for reasons you can't control, I must oppose. The reason is the clock. When you were told to try again at RFA to regain the tools, it means you should wait at least the minimum time before returning. While there is no actual minimum time, my personal minimum is in the 9 month range. I'm willing to bend that to 1-2 months for an admin on another project, zero delay for an admin eligible for courtesy resysopping, and maybe 6 for a former admin who is not eligible for courtesy resysopping or a new editor who is out-of-this-world exceptional. My !oppose is nothing personal, it's completely procedural. As I said at RFA, I'll be happy to nominate you myself come September. Fortunately for Wikipedia, I'll be easily out!voted and you should have the bit in a week. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Peter for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm sure you'll make it too! Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Talk 18:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thank you for your participation in
my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith ( talk), 22:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot ( talk) 22:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
This was what you call perfect timing. You can breath normally again. You deserve it. Syn ergy 19:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations Peter! I knew the community would see past the incident. You've come a long way from August, good job! Congratulations, and get ready to be my new admin pet help me out fairly often.
iMatthew //
talk // 23:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Well done Mr College on your (re?)adminship. Simply south not SS, sorry 23:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Peter, my sincere congratulations! :) *huggle* ;), — Aitias // discussion 23:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! J.delanoy gabs adds 23:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Well done on passing. I would recommend updating your edit notice when you have a moment. :) Camaron | Chris (talk) 19:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I had exams and wasn't paying attention to RfA, well done. — Realist 2 05:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
I just went out to play football and was going to contact you as soon as I got back to apologise for my comment on your RfA, so I will say what I was going to say before I saw your supportive comment.
I apologise unreservedly for the way I phrased my comment, it was intended in a light hearted way, since I felt the need to mitigate the fact that I was !voting oppose, something that I rarely do at RfA. If you are even 10% as upset about it as Neurolysis seems to be then I would feel bad. That said I stand by my point about abuse of process, I've made what I consider a fairly substantial contribution here and have never been close to being considered for adminship the idea that it can just be gifted to someone badly damages my faith in the project. I respect the fact that you admitted your error, I'm sure many other people have got away with it and many other abuses of the tools and still have them. Your comment has made me feel a lot better about my error of judgement after all the criticism from Neurolysis, and you have my respect, for what its worth. Regards King of the North East 23:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter - I recommended an article for speedy deletion Wikipedia:WikiProject Topical outlines/Draft/Topical outline of sustainability because I set it up many months ago and no longer wish to work with it. No other editors have made any changes over this period. I tried to find any comments or references to your decision (as recommended) but couldn't find them. Could you please advise. Granitethighs ( talk) 01:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Jolly good show. About time, too. // roux 05:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Peter. Sorry for not being around to give you "moral support" (or rather, making you freak out)... I've been sick. Congratulations on the RFA, you shouldn't have worried so much. You'll do great as you did before. Just DON'T SCREW UP AGAIN! kthxbai -- Chasingsol (talk) 07:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Lemon martini ( talk · contribs) is requesting exemption from the autoblock you imposed on Eco3 ( talk · contribs). They look legit to me ... long edit history and no blocks or warnings. But I am of course running it by you first. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
This page was just speedied for copyvio, but the creator of the article also created the webpage with the content. Can you restore the page? twirligig Leave one! ⋄ Check me out! 19:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete the COG logo I had uploaded? I work in the Public Affairs Office at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments - the logo was supplied by us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Millerlc3 ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I thought I had redirected it to Boxed (band), where there is definitly a page now (ceated by myself last night).
Hi Peter, I just wanted to congratulate you. I'm glad you made it back into the cabal (< poor attempt at humor) got your admin. back. I appreciate that you take care of the common folk, and know that sometimes it's more aggravation than it's worth - but I'm glad you're willing to do it. Guess that's all I really wanted to say ... have a good one.
Ched (
talk) 16:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Peter, congratulations on your RfA results. Turns out, the community has some shining moments. Happy adminning, Kingturtle ( talk) 18:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the access!-- Cerejota ( talk) 18:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sir, This is Nicole Marciano. I am asking you to please leave me alone. I am a private citizen and I am extremely uncomfortable with my personal information being posted online. I have not made the best choices in the past, specifically posing in Penthouse. I am a stay at home mother of 4 and lead a quiet life now with my children attending a private Christian school. Also, by including my real name, birthdate, the name of my sister and the high school I attended, my parents and sister have been harrassed by so-called fans. I don't mind my penthouse info being posted or any of the that, but PLEASE leave out all the personal information about the "real" me, specially my real name, DOB, and anything reguarding where I grew up and the high school I attended. I have been checking what has been written about me on here almost every day for months and it's always changed back and it's extremely upsetting.
There are many other Penthouse Pets on Wikipedia that has absolutely no information reguarding thier personal information, just which magazines they have been in and so forth, no real names or anything else. I would depesperately like to be one of them. Please! Please remove all refereces to my USMC tattoo as well. There is a reason I did not show it in photo shoots.
On a another note, I am fairly certain the user who is changing the info back all the time is a former disgruntled boyfriend who I have to deal with staulking issues in the past. If need be, I will contact the police once again to get him to stop harrassing me.
Finally, I am begging you to please leave me alone. I Have read through the rules reguarding living persons biographies and it says to do no harm. Well, sir, harm has been done and i truely hope this can be resolved without my having to contact an attorney.
Very Sincerely,
NICOLE MARCIANO
Please remove all persoanl information about me. If you are not the correct person to help me, PLEASE help me find out who is. I cannot have my realname and hometown on here, it is causing major problems for my family. Please help me!
Thank you in advance, Nicole Marciano
Thank you very, very much. I'm at my wits end about it and every time I delete the personal info about me it returns immediately, sometimes within hours. And today I just got a messagge that I will be blocked if I erase anything again. I'm beside myself over this! Thank you for your help!
Nicole marciano
There are broken links all over wikiepedia concerning the page you deleted. I do not eunderstand why there cannot be a page about Ron Sword, his books, and his guitars he has hand built that do not exist anywhere else in the world, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronswordofficial ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes I understand that, I had just created the page 5 min before it was deleted. Also, I did talk about Ron Sword's books, and his contributions to music theory. Did you not read the article posted? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ronswordofficial (
talk •
contribs) 23:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
ALSO, There are broken links on wikipedia referring to Ron Sword. Along with references to Published books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronswordofficial ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
I saw that the personal info on my page has been deleted and I could not be more grateful! Thank you so much!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacoblauren ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dear Peter,
Thank you so much for your approval to keep the article. I know that this is not the entry of a famous composer or anything, but I really do appreciate your help. YO ( talk) 17:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I recently asked for a semi-protect for Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research. It is due to User:Bushmills2000, who continues to re-insert a "Controversies" section that violates NPOV, RS, and OR. Basically, this is a school that has screwed over some employees (once of whome was Bushmills, it seems), and the disgrunteled employees have posted some blogs about the matter. The blogs, of course, don't work as sources for Wikipedia, and there aren't any reliable sources for anything in the "Controversies" section, so I removed it quite some time ago. I explained this to Bushmills in my first post on his talk page, after the first time he re-added the material. He continued to re-add it, however, and has shown no interest in discussing this. Additionally, he has now broken 3RR. I'm hesitant to change the page again (3RR for myself), but this is unsourced, original research, possibly conflict of intrest (not to mention potentially libelous) material which should be removed from the article. Additionally, and this goes back much further than the current situation, the discussion page for the article seems incredibly inappropriate, mostly full of personal attacks and discussion about the school itself, and very little about the article - should it be cleaned up, and if so, how? Thanks for your help with this. Otebig ( talk) 19:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
What claims of notability are asserted in Constance R Howard other than that someday she may put out an album? AnyPerson ( talk) 22:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
youre welcome, and thank you for protecting the page. ps: would you tell me how you got the awesome smiley at the lo right corner of your talk page? (edited) badmachine ( talk) 04:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Do you think that you could possibly leave any comments for me at my admin coaching page at User:Razorflame/Admin Coaching please? It would be very helpful. Cheers, Razor flame 14:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi - I note you've removed the speedy deletion tag from this page with edit commentary "speedy declined - no evidence of previous XfD discussion". While this is strictly true, there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clandestine Industries which I suspect is the same page with different capitalisation (as "Clandestine Industries" is protected against re-creation. So can it not be speedily deleted as recreation of deleted material? pablo :: ... hablo ... 16:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello PeterSymonds. CripKiller1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, — Aitias // discussion 14:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
A few days ago you blocked Total Drama Island. I was wondering if you could block Total Drama Action as many anonymous users are vandalizing it. I was also wondering if you could look at List of characters from Total Drama Island and see if you think it should be moved to something like List of characters from the Total Drama Series. I did but it was reverted as it was undiscussed. Lastly, I was wondering do I have or will I ever have the power to protect or delete articles? Sorry for asking so much! Thanks!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 00:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much for answering everything and protecting TDA. Major vandalism was going on there. Thanks again!- TDI19 ( talk) 13:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
why do you keep deleting the teramaze page??????? it s pissing me off!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.2.9.242 ( talk) 04:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Turns out, you can just add this to your monobook.css. Cheers, — Jake Wartenberg 16:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
You deleted my page because of copyright infringement with Tucson air conditioning. I would like to know how you came to this conclusion. Could you please let me know. Thanks much, Jeff JML2112 ( talk) 23:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter, I got to head to bed now, could you provide a second opinion to this request for protection and take care of it? Regards So Why 00:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you lock the edit this page section of Hannah Storm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.232.143 ( talk) 21:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I am horrified that my "Raymond Aaron" page has been deleted. I see that "Blatant Advertising" was the reason. I really did not intend to do that. I can see that the section called "Services Offered" is the offending section. Please allow me to have my page without that offending section. I really was not intending to advertise. I was just carried away, adding different pieces of information, and I see that I went too far. It was my very first article. I'm sorry.
Can you reinstate it without that offending section? Or can you reinstate it and I will immediately delete that section.
I spent so many hours refining it and making it complete and it seems a pity to lose all that work.
Please tell me the correct protocol for reinstatement. I hope you understand that I am not a bad person and I was not attempting to do anything bad. I was just carried away a bit. Sorry.
Raymond Aaron <email redacted> —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I just wrote you an apology, a few moments ago, but I did not notice the subject line. So, I have entered a subject line in this message to you. I just wanted to repeat that I am really horrified that I broke a Wikipedia rule. I really do want a wikipedia presence and have no desire to skirt the rules in any way. Please allow my article to be reinstated without the offending section of blatant advertising.
I do not know the exact protocol. But, please allow my reinstatement.
Raymond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
Thank you for understanding. I will read the rules more carefully and I will have a "pure" version done by 4pm EST Sunday Feb 1. Thank you again.
Raymond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I have completed the task of eliminating all "blatant advertising" and in doing so I realized how many of them there were. Sorry. You were totally right.
I have read the sections you told me to read and have complied (as far as I can tell).
Finally, the header information did not seem available for editing. So, there is one change right up at the beginning that I still need to make. Specifically, the offending sentence is ...
He is listed on page 1 of the Canadian Who’s Who [1] for his lifetime of achievement.
and, I wish it to read ...
He is listed in the Canadian Who’s Who [1].
Can you make this change before reinstating? Or, shall I make it myself as soon as it is reinstated? I dearly wish to comply.
Raymond —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Raymondaaron (
talk •
contribs) 18:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 20 |
Happy New Year! | ||
Hey there, PeterSymonds! Happy new
Gregorian year. All the best for the new year, both towards you and your family and friends too. I know that I am the only person lonely enough to be running this thing as the new year is ushered in, but meh, what are you going to do. I like to keep my templated messages in a satisfactorily melancholy tone. ;)
Congratulations to Coren, Wizardman, Vassyana, Carcharoth, Jayvdb, Casliber, Risker, Roger Davies, Cool Hand Luke and Rlevse, who were all appointed to the Arbitration Committee after the ArbCom elections. I am sure I am but a voice of many when I say I trust the aforementioned users to improve the committee, each in their own way, as listed within their respective election statements. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to update the 2009 article, heh. |
Many thanks for your comments! Fair use is reasonable as probably all other logos are copyright. The english wiki is particularly aggressive as exhibited by the image's 3 year survival on the german wiki. Would making a direct link from the english to the german image be appropriate? My tentative attempt can be found in the info box University of Zimbabwe. Part ( talk) 13:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Please help - HAPPY 2009.
Dear PeterSymonds,
Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.
Kind regards,
Majorly talk 21:34, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
Just wondering why you deleted the Wonder Book and Video page, an independent book video store when things like Blockbuster, Barnes/Noble, Amazon etc remain as entries? I don't remember the entry but I believe it had a history of the store. What advertising was posted? If someone posted "blatant advertising" wouldn't it be better to just delete that portion of the entry? [ [1]]
Thanks. Blindzero ( talk) 21:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Since the entry was written by someone outside of the company to begin with and was deleted, is it possible to to fast track a request for the entry to be readded? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
76.100.218.134 (
talk) 04:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Your input would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:DougsTech. You were the one to remove DougsTech's rollback access in August, so you might be able to add some thoughts there. Thanks, either way ( talk) 23:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Rather than take up a deletion review, the editor you explained deletion review to, on Julian Colton's page, has simply recreated the article, again witrh no sources. What's the next step? Who should take it? I'm trying to avoid drama. My first instinct was to blank the page and leave the editor a snotty note. So clearly I'm off balance on this. Would you please look into this and come up with, or at least suggest, a better approach than my first instinct. David in DC ( talk) 12:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thans so much for protecting the page I requested. I know it's not the best or most important article, but I just saw so much vandalism on that page. Thanks again, Bbhinton15 ( talk) 20:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for 'noindexing' the old page.
To answer your question on the border, I want it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Astral_highway
Someone put a COI tag on the Chemetco page and it's been suggested to me that it may alleviate people's fears if I disclose the nature of my relationship to this subject. I've now done this, but it's important that people actually notice it. (Actually, on this matter, should I move this to the Chemetco talk page instead? What do you think?)
To make this stand out, I wanted to include a border and light, translucent background. So it's not the main Wikipedia space, just part of my page.
Astral highway ( talk) 11:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Peace | ||
Hey, I meant to post this a long time ago, especially after that whole Catherine Deneuve incident. I just wanted to award you the Barnstar of Peace, given how peacefully you seem to resolve conflicts. Take care. Luke4545 ( talk) 20:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
I spent a miserable hour at CSD earlier today, with just about no help, deleting - though it beggars belief - G1's and G10's that were a few hours old and G12's and blatant A7's from 5-8 hours before. Sometimes this feels like an uphill battle and Wikipedia needs you back with +sysop. You know how active you were with the toolkit, and we've lost a lot of active people recently. Please think about asking for the bit back rather soon. As I've said before you can guarantee my nomination. Pedro : Chat 20:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
how do you place a template at your talk page's edit page? please tell me at my talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dont bite neutrals! ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
User:PeterSymonds/Archive 14 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for seeing to the changes to the UK Copyright article. Any idea about the user's status? Orthorhombic ( talk) 09:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad you changed your mind and decided to run again, Wikipedia will be better when you get the tools back. Unfortunately, for reasons you can't control, I must oppose. The reason is the clock. When you were told to try again at RFA to regain the tools, it means you should wait at least the minimum time before returning. While there is no actual minimum time, my personal minimum is in the 9 month range. I'm willing to bend that to 1-2 months for an admin on another project, zero delay for an admin eligible for courtesy resysopping, and maybe 6 for a former admin who is not eligible for courtesy resysopping or a new editor who is out-of-this-world exceptional. My !oppose is nothing personal, it's completely procedural. As I said at RFA, I'll be happy to nominate you myself come September. Fortunately for Wikipedia, I'll be easily out!voted and you should have the bit in a week. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you Peter for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm sure you'll make it too! Best regards, -- Kanonkas : Talk 18:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thank you for your participation in
my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith ( talk), 22:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot ( talk) 22:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
This was what you call perfect timing. You can breath normally again. You deserve it. Syn ergy 19:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations Peter! I knew the community would see past the incident. You've come a long way from August, good job! Congratulations, and get ready to be my new admin pet help me out fairly often.
iMatthew //
talk // 23:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Well done Mr College on your (re?)adminship. Simply south not SS, sorry 23:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Peter, my sincere congratulations! :) *huggle* ;), — Aitias // discussion 23:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! J.delanoy gabs adds 23:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Well done on passing. I would recommend updating your edit notice when you have a moment. :) Camaron | Chris (talk) 19:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, I had exams and wasn't paying attention to RfA, well done. — Realist 2 05:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
I just went out to play football and was going to contact you as soon as I got back to apologise for my comment on your RfA, so I will say what I was going to say before I saw your supportive comment.
I apologise unreservedly for the way I phrased my comment, it was intended in a light hearted way, since I felt the need to mitigate the fact that I was !voting oppose, something that I rarely do at RfA. If you are even 10% as upset about it as Neurolysis seems to be then I would feel bad. That said I stand by my point about abuse of process, I've made what I consider a fairly substantial contribution here and have never been close to being considered for adminship the idea that it can just be gifted to someone badly damages my faith in the project. I respect the fact that you admitted your error, I'm sure many other people have got away with it and many other abuses of the tools and still have them. Your comment has made me feel a lot better about my error of judgement after all the criticism from Neurolysis, and you have my respect, for what its worth. Regards King of the North East 23:31, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter - I recommended an article for speedy deletion Wikipedia:WikiProject Topical outlines/Draft/Topical outline of sustainability because I set it up many months ago and no longer wish to work with it. No other editors have made any changes over this period. I tried to find any comments or references to your decision (as recommended) but couldn't find them. Could you please advise. Granitethighs ( talk) 01:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Jolly good show. About time, too. // roux 05:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey Peter. Sorry for not being around to give you "moral support" (or rather, making you freak out)... I've been sick. Congratulations on the RFA, you shouldn't have worried so much. You'll do great as you did before. Just DON'T SCREW UP AGAIN! kthxbai -- Chasingsol (talk) 07:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Lemon martini ( talk · contribs) is requesting exemption from the autoblock you imposed on Eco3 ( talk · contribs). They look legit to me ... long edit history and no blocks or warnings. But I am of course running it by you first. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
This page was just speedied for copyvio, but the creator of the article also created the webpage with the content. Can you restore the page? twirligig Leave one! ⋄ Check me out! 19:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you delete the COG logo I had uploaded? I work in the Public Affairs Office at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments - the logo was supplied by us. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Millerlc3 ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
I thought I had redirected it to Boxed (band), where there is definitly a page now (ceated by myself last night).
Hi Peter, I just wanted to congratulate you. I'm glad you made it back into the cabal (< poor attempt at humor) got your admin. back. I appreciate that you take care of the common folk, and know that sometimes it's more aggravation than it's worth - but I'm glad you're willing to do it. Guess that's all I really wanted to say ... have a good one.
Ched (
talk) 16:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Peter, congratulations on your RfA results. Turns out, the community has some shining moments. Happy adminning, Kingturtle ( talk) 18:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the access!-- Cerejota ( talk) 18:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Sir, This is Nicole Marciano. I am asking you to please leave me alone. I am a private citizen and I am extremely uncomfortable with my personal information being posted online. I have not made the best choices in the past, specifically posing in Penthouse. I am a stay at home mother of 4 and lead a quiet life now with my children attending a private Christian school. Also, by including my real name, birthdate, the name of my sister and the high school I attended, my parents and sister have been harrassed by so-called fans. I don't mind my penthouse info being posted or any of the that, but PLEASE leave out all the personal information about the "real" me, specially my real name, DOB, and anything reguarding where I grew up and the high school I attended. I have been checking what has been written about me on here almost every day for months and it's always changed back and it's extremely upsetting.
There are many other Penthouse Pets on Wikipedia that has absolutely no information reguarding thier personal information, just which magazines they have been in and so forth, no real names or anything else. I would depesperately like to be one of them. Please! Please remove all refereces to my USMC tattoo as well. There is a reason I did not show it in photo shoots.
On a another note, I am fairly certain the user who is changing the info back all the time is a former disgruntled boyfriend who I have to deal with staulking issues in the past. If need be, I will contact the police once again to get him to stop harrassing me.
Finally, I am begging you to please leave me alone. I Have read through the rules reguarding living persons biographies and it says to do no harm. Well, sir, harm has been done and i truely hope this can be resolved without my having to contact an attorney.
Very Sincerely,
NICOLE MARCIANO
Please remove all persoanl information about me. If you are not the correct person to help me, PLEASE help me find out who is. I cannot have my realname and hometown on here, it is causing major problems for my family. Please help me!
Thank you in advance, Nicole Marciano
Thank you very, very much. I'm at my wits end about it and every time I delete the personal info about me it returns immediately, sometimes within hours. And today I just got a messagge that I will be blocked if I erase anything again. I'm beside myself over this! Thank you for your help!
Nicole marciano
There are broken links all over wikiepedia concerning the page you deleted. I do not eunderstand why there cannot be a page about Ron Sword, his books, and his guitars he has hand built that do not exist anywhere else in the world, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronswordofficial ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes I understand that, I had just created the page 5 min before it was deleted. Also, I did talk about Ron Sword's books, and his contributions to music theory. Did you not read the article posted? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Ronswordofficial (
talk •
contribs) 23:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
ALSO, There are broken links on wikipedia referring to Ron Sword. Along with references to Published books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronswordofficial ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
I saw that the personal info on my page has been deleted and I could not be more grateful! Thank you so much!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacoblauren ( talk • contribs) 23:35, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dear Peter,
Thank you so much for your approval to keep the article. I know that this is not the entry of a famous composer or anything, but I really do appreciate your help. YO ( talk) 17:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
I recently asked for a semi-protect for Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research. It is due to User:Bushmills2000, who continues to re-insert a "Controversies" section that violates NPOV, RS, and OR. Basically, this is a school that has screwed over some employees (once of whome was Bushmills, it seems), and the disgrunteled employees have posted some blogs about the matter. The blogs, of course, don't work as sources for Wikipedia, and there aren't any reliable sources for anything in the "Controversies" section, so I removed it quite some time ago. I explained this to Bushmills in my first post on his talk page, after the first time he re-added the material. He continued to re-add it, however, and has shown no interest in discussing this. Additionally, he has now broken 3RR. I'm hesitant to change the page again (3RR for myself), but this is unsourced, original research, possibly conflict of intrest (not to mention potentially libelous) material which should be removed from the article. Additionally, and this goes back much further than the current situation, the discussion page for the article seems incredibly inappropriate, mostly full of personal attacks and discussion about the school itself, and very little about the article - should it be cleaned up, and if so, how? Thanks for your help with this. Otebig ( talk) 19:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
What claims of notability are asserted in Constance R Howard other than that someday she may put out an album? AnyPerson ( talk) 22:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
youre welcome, and thank you for protecting the page. ps: would you tell me how you got the awesome smiley at the lo right corner of your talk page? (edited) badmachine ( talk) 04:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Do you think that you could possibly leave any comments for me at my admin coaching page at User:Razorflame/Admin Coaching please? It would be very helpful. Cheers, Razor flame 14:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi - I note you've removed the speedy deletion tag from this page with edit commentary "speedy declined - no evidence of previous XfD discussion". While this is strictly true, there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clandestine Industries which I suspect is the same page with different capitalisation (as "Clandestine Industries" is protected against re-creation. So can it not be speedily deleted as recreation of deleted material? pablo :: ... hablo ... 16:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello PeterSymonds. CripKiller1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, — Aitias // discussion 14:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
A few days ago you blocked Total Drama Island. I was wondering if you could block Total Drama Action as many anonymous users are vandalizing it. I was also wondering if you could look at List of characters from Total Drama Island and see if you think it should be moved to something like List of characters from the Total Drama Series. I did but it was reverted as it was undiscussed. Lastly, I was wondering do I have or will I ever have the power to protect or delete articles? Sorry for asking so much! Thanks!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 00:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much for answering everything and protecting TDA. Major vandalism was going on there. Thanks again!- TDI19 ( talk) 13:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
why do you keep deleting the teramaze page??????? it s pissing me off!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.2.9.242 ( talk) 04:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Turns out, you can just add this to your monobook.css. Cheers, — Jake Wartenberg 16:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
You deleted my page because of copyright infringement with Tucson air conditioning. I would like to know how you came to this conclusion. Could you please let me know. Thanks much, Jeff JML2112 ( talk) 23:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter, I got to head to bed now, could you provide a second opinion to this request for protection and take care of it? Regards So Why 00:15, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you lock the edit this page section of Hannah Storm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.232.143 ( talk) 21:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I am horrified that my "Raymond Aaron" page has been deleted. I see that "Blatant Advertising" was the reason. I really did not intend to do that. I can see that the section called "Services Offered" is the offending section. Please allow me to have my page without that offending section. I really was not intending to advertise. I was just carried away, adding different pieces of information, and I see that I went too far. It was my very first article. I'm sorry.
Can you reinstate it without that offending section? Or can you reinstate it and I will immediately delete that section.
I spent so many hours refining it and making it complete and it seems a pity to lose all that work.
Please tell me the correct protocol for reinstatement. I hope you understand that I am not a bad person and I was not attempting to do anything bad. I was just carried away a bit. Sorry.
Raymond Aaron <email redacted> —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I just wrote you an apology, a few moments ago, but I did not notice the subject line. So, I have entered a subject line in this message to you. I just wanted to repeat that I am really horrified that I broke a Wikipedia rule. I really do want a wikipedia presence and have no desire to skirt the rules in any way. Please allow my article to be reinstated without the offending section of blatant advertising.
I do not know the exact protocol. But, please allow my reinstatement.
Raymond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
Thank you for understanding. I will read the rules more carefully and I will have a "pure" version done by 4pm EST Sunday Feb 1. Thank you again.
Raymond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I have completed the task of eliminating all "blatant advertising" and in doing so I realized how many of them there were. Sorry. You were totally right.
I have read the sections you told me to read and have complied (as far as I can tell).
Finally, the header information did not seem available for editing. So, there is one change right up at the beginning that I still need to make. Specifically, the offending sentence is ...
He is listed on page 1 of the Canadian Who’s Who [1] for his lifetime of achievement.
and, I wish it to read ...
He is listed in the Canadian Who’s Who [1].
Can you make this change before reinstating? Or, shall I make it myself as soon as it is reinstated? I dearly wish to comply.
Raymond —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Raymondaaron (
talk •
contribs) 18:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |