Final (5/4/3); Ended 20:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Rudget ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - This must be the first time since October that I have done such a thing as self-nominate. Promoted to administrator in January of this year, I have only a short tenure (only 14 weeks) as one and I suspect that this RfB will fail because of that, but I'm willing to see what might happen. :)
The reason I'm putting myself up for bureaucratship is not for the userbox on my page, not for the listing on WP:CRAT, but for a position of responsibility, to work with even more people and to help out at CHU and RFA. I know bureaucrat candidacies generally fail because of the 'no need' for bureaucrats arguments and a few others, plus some additional comments with respect to a user's history and standing on Wikipedia, and I expect that to crop up in this particular case, since I'm sure there are more experienced administrators out there (just not willing to put themselves forward). I'll now go on to summarise my experience in 'crat related areas:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a Bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Question from Avruch
Please keep discussion constructive and civil.
Final (5/4/3); Ended 20:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Rudget ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) - This must be the first time since October that I have done such a thing as self-nominate. Promoted to administrator in January of this year, I have only a short tenure (only 14 weeks) as one and I suspect that this RfB will fail because of that, but I'm willing to see what might happen. :)
The reason I'm putting myself up for bureaucratship is not for the userbox on my page, not for the listing on WP:CRAT, but for a position of responsibility, to work with even more people and to help out at CHU and RFA. I know bureaucrat candidacies generally fail because of the 'no need' for bureaucrats arguments and a few others, plus some additional comments with respect to a user's history and standing on Wikipedia, and I expect that to crop up in this particular case, since I'm sure there are more experienced administrators out there (just not willing to put themselves forward). I'll now go on to summarise my experience in 'crat related areas:
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as a Bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Question from Avruch
Please keep discussion constructive and civil.