My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. rootology ( C)( T) 07:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | I love stars |
Dear Peter ...
When I came back today to see if you had replied yet, our conversation had disappeared. I don't know what happened. So, let me repeat. I have revised the article so that it complies. I want to change the line about the Who's Who but I cannot see the edit button to revise it. Please reinstate the article and I will correct that line too.
Thank you for your scrutiny to keep Wikipedia pure.
Raymond Aaron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For dealing with a particularly large number of requests for page protection today as well as the great job you usually do in this area. I am glad you are back :-) Regards So Why 10:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for protecting the Ricardo Quaresma article and responding so quickly, much appreciated keep up the great work! Tango22 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC).
Thanks for granting me rollback!! :D astatine -210 discovered elements ∞ what am I? 23:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I am on the Board of The Transformational Leadership Council. We have decided to have a separate article on Wikipedia, instead of having reference to it under Jack Canfield, the founder.
Every time I tried to create a TLC article, I kept getting directed to Canfield's article.
So, I deleted all reference to TLC from Canfield's article and still I keep getting directed to Canfield.
Once I mis=typed "Transformation Leadership Council" and now I cannot delete it.
This is quite frustrating.
Would you please ...
1. Delete "Transformation Leadership Council" or else tell me how I can do it. 2. Would you please tell me how to create a "Transformational Leadership Council" article.
I greatly appreciate your help.
Raymond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
WH YDOES EVERYONE KEEP DELETING MY ARTICLES! YES - - I KNOW THEY LOOK LIKE TEST PAGES, GIVE ME TIME TO MAKE THEM INTO ARTICLES FIRST!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Planeteer12 ( talk • contribs) 10:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
As of an hour ago, I have obeyed every single rule and I have accepted every suggestion on my article. Would you now please consider reinstating it?
Raymond Aaron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I am so glad you were patient.
Raymondaaron ( talk) 22:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Raymond Aaron
Dear Peter ...
I have been authorized by The Transformational Leadership Council to post an article. But, every time I attempt to do so, I get shown Jack Canfield's article. He was the founder of TLC. But, I have deleted all reference to TLC in his article so that I can post a whole new article for TLC. Yet, even though all references have been deleted, I still get sent to his page when I attempt to create a new article.
This is frustrating.
How can I create a new article for Transformational Leadership Council?
Raymondaaron ( talk) 22:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Raymondaaron
One of the opposes was indented, so posting a query to make certain you're aware you promoted a nomination as consensus support while it actually had 3 supports and 2 opposes. Durova Charge! 03:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Um - are you sure?? I was just looking at this one when it went ..... I was just thinking AFD... Pedro : Chat 09:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, after you locked the JF-17 article a few days ago the vandalism stopped, but the article is now unlocked and is being edited again with incorrect information. The user with IP address 24.87.45.232 keeps changing the specifications section with information from an unreliable source that is different to what all other sources say. The user has never used the discussion section at all to discuss changes, he/she just keeps making edits. Is there any chance that you can lock the article again, or perhaps take action against this user? Hj108 ( talk) 14:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You deleted the article Nuke the fridge and prevented recreation. However a new article Nuking the fridge has been created, to which Nuke the fridge is an obvious redirect. Therefore, would it be possible for you to recreate the page as a redirect, and then lock it?
Alternatively, you may decide that the Nuking the fridge article is an attempt to circumvent the deletion of the Nuke the fridge article. (I would probably agree with this.) However, even if is the case, there is an obvious contradiction between an article existing under one name, and it being blocked under another name.
Regards,
— Hyperdeath( Talk) 17:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
protect Total Drama Action again. I am sorry for asking again after it's last protection just expired, but since then there have been around 75 edits, probably half of them vandalism or deletion of pages, plus unofficial rumors being put up every 5 minutes. Greatly, greatly appreciated- TDI19 ( talk) 21:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 21:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there :) I saw your offer for help on the editor assisstance page. I wondered if you could possibley help me with the discussions on the leeds page. I feel the page is in breach of core policies, and I would like an experienced editor in this field to see if they feel this is true, and if so to advice on what steps to take. I have brought up the core policy issues, as have numerous admins and editors involved in the discussion, and such assertions are never refuted, yet the article remains in status quote, and any changes that address the core policy issues is reverted. Hope you can offer your experience, thankyou -- Razorlax ( talk) 22:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Ada High School (disambiguation), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Ada High School (disambiguation) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (
CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Ada High School (disambiguation), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 08:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
can you please protect Tupac Amaru Shakur's article on a higher level some how. there has been a lot of vandalism, probably due to the film "notorious" coming out in the cinema's about the notorious B.I.G (one of tupac's main rival) and i think fans have been vandalizing the page as a sort of relaliation for notorious big's side. i would be very thankful if you protected it even more as i have had to edit the page many times and the vandals carry on vandalizing the article. thanks 04dejand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 04dejand ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if you were monitoring the recreated article and the promotional activities of the eponymous editor? Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 20:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
←I fired a large warning shot on hos talk page and ripped a lot of spam and POV stuff out of the article and some of the other articles. I have seen evidence of restraint, though I think it and the related articles are very advert-like. I think we still need to keep an eye. Especially the links, which appear to go directly to "buy buy buy" pages. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I am RAYMOND AARON. I am doing my best to be a good Wikipedia contributor. I listened carefully to Peter's comments and obeyed them. I have done my best to delete all opinions and all "blatant advertising". I am proud to have a Wikipedia article and I do intend to obey all rules. You have requested CITATIONS for my athletic achievements. Some of them occurred before computers and really there is no online record. This pertains to my marathons and my ultramarathon and my caving and alpine club. I do have a photograph of riding my 5-foot-tall "giraffe" unicycle and I have posted that as proof that I can ride it. However, I will never be able to provide CITATIONS for achievements that occurred before computers began recording information online. I would really appreciate your removing the CITATION REQUESTS for those athletic achievements for which there is no independent verification. Raymondaaron ( talk) 14:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Raymond Aaron
I believe this image was deleted on an incorrect basis. The request by Madeofstars was per Wikipedia:CSD#G7: "Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith". As I understand it, this criterion is a discretionary one, not mandatory. The image was in use in three articles and as it is a historic image (i.e. from 2003) it is not replacable. The user put it in article space, when it was first uploaded on 6 December 2008. [1] Furthermore, on 17 December 2008, he reinstated it after a deletion of the image was reversed. [2]
Two months later, he decides he wants it deleted, but has not given any reason why this should happen. The file upload page [3] under step 2 "free license" says in bold, "This release is not revocable." The norm is that we do not allow material, once released under a free licence, to be removed. This is especially the case when it is incorporated into articles.
I am not asking for the image to be undeleted, as it is already on Commons, so would need to be deleted for that reason anyway. The user does not seem to have realised this, as the new name for the image had not been put in the article to replace the old one (I have now done this). However, I request that you inform the uploader Madeofstars that this was the only legitimate reason for its deletion, and that he has given a licence that the upload page clearly states "is not revocable", so he should not normally expect such deletion requests to be met.
Ty 03:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
FYI, there is now more on this at User talk:Tyrenius#Stella Vine and Rosy Wilde photos, Commons:User_talk:Geni#Madeofstars and User_talk:Madeofstars#Photos_of_stella_vine_and_her_gallery. Ty 06:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter, I reverted the page because of a long list of what appeared to be trivia added. It wasn't sourced, and I wasn't going to track down the individual items. This was the version I reverted, and it looks like it may be a well meaning very new user who is editing, so I didn't create his talk page or anything. When you have a moment, could you look at it and advise me on any different measures I should have taken. Thanks — Ched ( talk) 14:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Can you block editing talk page? Versus22 talk 21:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I posted somebody for vandalism. You noticed that there weren't any warnings. The reason is because I'm not interested in giving out warnings. I just brought that user to the attention of administrators. Should I have done that on another page? Anyway, if you want to take care of it, there's Special:Contributions/92.12.36.59 also, apart from the Special:Contributions/4.88.20.100 I mentioned there. Debresser ( talk) 08:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I read your communication with Fiddle Faddle and I am doing my best to comply.
I have just revised the article again deleting every single objection you could possibly have. I have deleted ALL my athletic accomplishments (except Polar Race since you did not object to that as it has a citation).
I even deleted reference to my own website www.Aaron.com even though you did not object to that.
There is nothing left to do. It seems to me it is totally clean.
Would you PLEASE remove the objectionable notice at the top of my page about COI? Please.
Raymondaaron ( talk) 14:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Raymond Aaron
Dear Peter,
ITS is an organization and one of the most renowned platform for young creativity, we have a large press coverage from international press, see our press page http://www.itsweb.org/jsp/en/presstype/type_1_edition_5.jsp and I think it can be an informative page for who is looking for opportunities for young talents and anyway we are not taking space from others or creating fake or just adv pages.
If you think it can work I will try to write the text with a more encyclopedic style. Thanks pablo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobbaccio ( talk • contribs) 11:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Raymond Aaron, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Aaron. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 15:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks again for protecting Total Drama Action. I was wondering if you could protect Dancing with the Stars (U.S. Season 8) please. People keep unofficially pairing professionals with celebrities. Thanks- TDI19 ( talk) 23:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 00:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Umm, I'm actually kind of glad you semi-protected the dwts season 8 page, but I'm confused. It says in the wiki policy that semi-protected pages can only be edited by users who have autoconfirmed their accounts. Well, uhh, I autoconfirmed my account, and I still can't edit the page when logged in. Explanation? Help? Thanks
Mallory, onesmallnote —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onesmallnote ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I've just reverted several vandal edits for contribs 195.194.86.166 (a school). I don't know the procedures, so I'm hoping you will deal with it appropriately. Thanks. -- Johnuniq ( talk) 11:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter. I have a bit of a problem. this edit concerns me. I admit that I have the Larry Sanger page in my watch list, and I have contributed greatly to the talk page. I came across the whole thing back in mid-January through an RfC, and attempted to make changes around the 15th of January, but I'm getting bogged down in my own thoughts here. Anyway - the issue that I have a problem with is that QuackGuru insists that the following be included as such (even though another editor attempted to include the information in a more rational manner)
(from article) While Citizendium is wiki-based, several aspects set it apart from Wikipedia:
Primarily the statement that "Wikipedia seeks consensus and not truth" is placed in a comparison that makes it appear to be a fact, rather than what some OP-ED columnist wrote (my thoughts are WP:SYN). (end paste)
The whole issue has been through 3O, RfC, and WP:WQA recently, and nothing has been accomplished. I admit, I'm relatively new (mid-Nov.), so I am open to suggestions. The editor (QuackGuru) has been around for quite some time, and due to his block log, I would imagine he/she is familiar to many editors. I honestly believe that his/her edits to the article are degrading the quality of the article. Since this is not only a BLP, but a BLP of a founding member (exact definition isn't an issue with me) of Wikipedia - I would think that the article would be important.
Peter, I respect your opinion here - and if you feel it's best for me to just walk away from the whole thing I will. I think the article is important, and my first instinct was to revert and tag QuackGuru with a vandal notice, but I doubt that would accomplish anything. I would greatly appreciate any advise you could offer on this. — Ched ( talk) 11:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I have been trying to advise him and finding that there is a disconnect between my advice, which he says he is grateful for, and his actions. He is currently ojn a roll editing references into the article in what looks like a flurry of desperation, but without checking the end product, and seems not to be aware of the issues. I am taking a pace back form this because it is actually heart rending. You were kind enough to advise him before me, and I hope you can bring fresh eyes!
At the end we may well have a salvageable article, and a lot of that will be down to him, but... HELP! Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 17:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Peter,
Can you help me? I would like to appear here as a hungarian vibist. Why did you delete my page, copyrights, syntactic errors ... ?
Thanks in advance,
Richard Szaniszlo, vibist —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.66.156.52 ( talk) 23:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I was going through Let It Be... Naked and I saw that at the end it says "Cite error: ref tags exist, but no references/ tag was found." I have limited citation experience, but I tried a few things to fix it (without saving my changes). I don't understand how to fix this. I've seen it before, and I'd like to know how to handle it. Thank you. Belasted ( talk) 01:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the fixes. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Peter - I don't want to get in a squabble over this on the talk page, but it probably would have been better to add the 'under discussion' tag and leave the 'policy' tag off. there's just too much aggravation over this page for it to pretend to the kind of consensus that policy is supposed to have. just my two cents, and my apologies if I dropped you into the middle of a quagmire. -- Ludwigs2 02:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter, thanks for the ACC, and I'll make sure I read through everything before I actually do anything. ;). By the way, don't you ever sleep? .. lol. .. I see that admin Moni3 has been working with an editor I had questions about recently. That's great! I tried, I really did, and I think the talk page does reflect that, but the important thing is the article seems to have settled down for now (thank goodness).
While I'm here - I've seen several editors mention "gwarp", but I can't find info on it. What is a gwarp or gwarping? — Ched ( talk) 13:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Are you sure this edit was the right thing to do? Looking back at the previous few edits, I noticed that 1nt2 ( talk · contribs) replaced the previous {{ pp-semi-indef}} template with a {{ editprotected}} template, and the page logs suggest the page is still under semi-protection. Astronaut ( talk) 13:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I have finally finished the prep work for Fielding. Here is a list of things I need you and NuclearWarfare to complete. If there are any questions about individual sections, missing info, etc, just contact me and I will provide the bulk. I basically need help with all the formatting. Right now, I am keeping everything on one page (the individual plays sections right now). Wikilinks, leads, summaries (for the "early plays" page) and formatting are the primary concerns. Any work is a help, and remember, this will be 15 pages (plus one more about the 1733 Actor's Rebellion, which I will put together tomorrow). Thanks and sorry for the delay. Ottava Rima ( talk) 03:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with
sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of
disruptive edits, which earns
warnings and
blocks.
The
IRC cabal has discovered that you have given
a user, rollback, when they aren't yet autocomfirmed. Please accept this slap as way of thanks. ;)
Thankyou,
Foxy Loxy
Pounce! 04:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC) with CWii's approval
CWii(
Talk|
Contribs) 04:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi, I was curious about your putting only semiprotection on Reggaeton, given that one of the edit warriors is a registered user. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 03:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi again. I would like to thank you so much with all your help with the Total Drama articles, but it is annoying me that established users are now vandalizing it and using it for personal predictions, and I do not know what we should do about it. I was also wondering if I could be a rollback. I am really responsible, and want to keep Wikipedia clean and informative, and I think I will do a great job as one. Thanks again for everything!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 19:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Peter,
The Bachelor Season 13 is getting closer and closer to the season finale and people keep vandalizing the page. Is there any way you could semi-protect it? I'd really appreciate it. It's getting tiring to keep deleting the same vandalism over and over again. Onesmallnote ( talk) 02:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey. As I noticed you were the blocking administrator in this recent sockpuppet case, I have to come to you. This is kind of embarassing since I'm the one who filed both the SPI and a few different ANI threads...
The Checkuser came back saying that LGOutcast =/= Lizard1000. However, Lizard1000 was blocked as a sock of LGOutcast per the duck test [4]. Now he's been cleared by CheckUser. Lizard1000 and Koskidzrules1 were the same person, but if Lizard1000's block was wrong, what does that mean for the guy?
I'm not at all sure where to proceed from here, but I wanted to bring all this to your attention. McJeff ( talk) 07:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter I posted a comment on your ban on International Talent Support and I would like to know if it would be possible to create the International Talent Support voice again in a more informative way. If you think it is worth I can submit the content to you first to check if it can be interesting for wikipedia users. Any suggestion is welcome thanks pablo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobbaccio ( talk • contribs) 11:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi - can you protect the Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport article again? You had done so previously, and now that the prttection's expired, the IP user is up to the same tricks again. Thanks! Jasepl ( talk) 19:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Peter,
You've protected {{ val}}, which I created and still continue to develop. I have a change that's needed to fix an alignment issue (see Template_talk:Val#Uncertainties_alignment_.28in_the_.2B_x_-_y_case.29. for details). Is it possible to grant me write-access to this template? If not, can you make the modification as specified on the talk page for me?
SkyLined
{
talk
contribs 15:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)That didn't take long. :). Dloh cierekim 21:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
I only just spotted that you got the mop back and am very glad to hear it. Had I seen your RfA I'd have supported, but looks like you had no shortage. Congrats and best wishes, Ka renjc 21:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The ARCHIVE UR TALK PAGE barnstar | ||
ARCHIVE UR TALK PAGE. Kthxbai. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |
Doesn't that fact that I had one support from an independant wikipedia entry make it hard to justify using WP:SNOW. I was answering complaints and they never had a chance to respond. I thought my RFA was legitement and while was a though battle I wouldn't say it had no chance in hell of getting through. Such a decision seemed arbitary. I would encourage you to reconsider if that is at all possible or at least respond to me. -- AresAndEnyo ( talk) 19:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Peter - Thank you! However, the sock had removed the text moments before your protection - if I revert the page, will that remove the protection? Eagle Rock, Los Angeles, California Or do you need to do the reversion, and then re-protect the page? Thanks in advance. Timmccloud ( talk) 20:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
[5] Patton t/ c 00:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
←Well, all water under the bridge now. ;).. and when I see some kids hangin out at the mall, saggin pants, dopin' it up, and I start to worry for my grandkids future - I can come here, and see what great gifts, hard work, and tremendous thought also comes from the young generation - and I don't worry quite so much anymore. Keep up the good work ;) — Ched ( talk) 14:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
After being denied 2 times, could to help me with some tips to acquire rollback rights?-- Vinni3 ( talk) 12:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I note in the conclusion to the Homeboy99 sockpuppet case you report that all have been blocked. However, it would appear that Homeboy100 ( talk · contribs), has somehow been overlooked. The user has continued to vandalize the David Suzuki article [6] [7], introducing the very same unreferenced claims as in the past. Thanks for looking into this. Victoriagirl ( talk) 14:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, i'm contacting you concerning this:
The sock puppet that was blocked today (February 21) has returned yet again, has self-identified as a new incarnation of a blocked ID, and has left some very interesting comments, including a question for Wikipedia administrators. Here are excerpts:
This sounds as if the sock puppeteer is a high officer in the company (the Burke Group). After months of interaction with several incarnations of this individual, that would not surprise me at all.
And, the new sock puppet expresses the intent to ignore the block by using the new identity to edit.
I think it may be time for an administrator's intervention beyond blocking for sock puppetry. I'm not sure how that should come about, but this individual seems to consider many other editors to be ideological enemies, so a resolution may require some sort of escalation.
thanks very much, Richard Myers ( talk) 04:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peter,
Thanks for your prompt reply for my request for rollback permissions. I will take your advice and work at it for a few more weeks. My main reason for the request is that I am currently using a tool
WikiGuard which is for OS X to catch and undo vandalism, wanted to start doing some work from my PC, but the only tool that seams to be worth it is
Huggle, but I will keep it up. I have been running a deployment of MediaWiki for a large company for a while now (it is amazing how much vandalism can be caused in a company) It is nice to start "sinking my teeth" in on a much larger base of information, and users.
--
Djcam (
talk) 23:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting Charm School Gives Back. It has been recreated in the past few minutes, then blanked, then tagged, then blanked, ... Also, what is the policy for a user keeping a copy of the page as his/her own userpage User: Charm School Gives Back? I thought that this was one of the things a userpage was not supposed to be used for (i.e., instead use a sandbox). Thanks! Plastikspork ( talk) 00:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
In the interest of saving time, maybe the unblock request template could have a top-ten excuses checklist for vandals and socks who deny wrongdoing. Some possible entries they could select from:
Maybe I'll pose this idea on WP:ANI. Or maybe NOT. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 19:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
←LMFAO ??? <*searchin for reply *> I got nothin — Ched ( talk) 00:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
And just today, here's an indef-blocked user that wants someone to tell him how to evade checkuser in the future: [10] Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I see that you are deleting CSD images. I tagged a great many this night, so if you have any questions or issues feel free to leave me a message. Hopefully I wasn't so tired that I did anything stupid... Have a good day! ~ JohnnyMrNinja 11:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
What exactly do I need to do to put the image from Robert Owen's website on his Wikipedia page. I have permission from him to place it on Wikipedia.
SOURCE: http://owens2008.com/home/about-robert/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Owens —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitacore ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
What exactly do I need to do to put the image from Robert Owen's website on his Wikipedia page. I have permission from him to place it on Wikipedia.
SOURCE: http://owens2008.com/home/about-robert/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Owens —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitacore ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I hate to trouble you, but I'm in a bit of a rush. I can't remember where to go to suggest someone be blocked. But this editor has had their last warning, and continues to vandalize: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jigsaw1819 Thank you.
While we're on the subject... Is there a template or something to use to tell editors to stop vandalizing, etc.? Are they restricted to administrators? Sorry, I am a constructive editor, but I have trouble with all the little things, I can't read everything under the sun. Belasted ( talk) 01:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
would you take a look at the graphic on Solar power in Romania. At first I thought it was a prank cause it just looks like a fish - but I don't know. thanks — Ched ( talk) 18:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering how do you apply to become a rollback. Thanks- TDI19 ( talk) 00:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the semi-protection. Her article needed it. :) Acalamari 19:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter,
We've noticed your comments in the discussion page on the Lafayette Morehouse wikipedia entry, and wondered if you could give us some advice. We are members of the community that is discussed on that page - we've created Wikipedia user accounts that disclose our status so that our "conflict of interest" is public.
The entry about our community was written by others - largely by Zoticogrillo who identifies himself as not a member of our community. Although the article is overall positive, it contains a very large number of errors both favorable and critical. We would like to revise it in a wholesale fashion to correct those, and to try and do this in a balanced fashion. Not all of the subject matter under discussion has secondary / citable sources, so we are unsure how to document each point, the one scholarly paper published about the community contains many footnotes of the type "conversations with <person name>, on date" - is this allowable as a reference?
Since wikipedia is a community effort, in a certain sense no one is "in charge" so we aren't sure how to proceed.
We've posted two questions in the discussion page - you'll find a comment from MoreOceana and myself (80guy), no one has responded.
We've read some of the many FAQ - the one about biographies of living persons, the one about "article subjects" (ie the subject of the article is us)
You advice in this matter is appreciated.
Thanks 80Guy -- 80 Guy (George) ( talk) 22:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80 guy ( talk • contribs) 02:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Smratlik ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Good block. The Pioneer Courthouse stuff aside, he was quickly proving to be a contentious user and probably would have been nailed in the near future just for that. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 21:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for tossing me the rollback feature. Not sure how I got nominated, but I greatly appreciate it. Going to give Huggle a shot so hopefully I can be of even more help. Thanks again! Gnowor ( talk) 21:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
My RFA passed today at 150/48/6. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. rootology ( C)( T) 07:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | I love stars |
Dear Peter ...
When I came back today to see if you had replied yet, our conversation had disappeared. I don't know what happened. So, let me repeat. I have revised the article so that it complies. I want to change the line about the Who's Who but I cannot see the edit button to revise it. Please reinstate the article and I will correct that line too.
Thank you for your scrutiny to keep Wikipedia pure.
Raymond Aaron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
For dealing with a particularly large number of requests for page protection today as well as the great job you usually do in this area. I am glad you are back :-) Regards So Why 10:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for protecting the Ricardo Quaresma article and responding so quickly, much appreciated keep up the great work! Tango22 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC).
Thanks for granting me rollback!! :D astatine -210 discovered elements ∞ what am I? 23:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I am on the Board of The Transformational Leadership Council. We have decided to have a separate article on Wikipedia, instead of having reference to it under Jack Canfield, the founder.
Every time I tried to create a TLC article, I kept getting directed to Canfield's article.
So, I deleted all reference to TLC from Canfield's article and still I keep getting directed to Canfield.
Once I mis=typed "Transformation Leadership Council" and now I cannot delete it.
This is quite frustrating.
Would you please ...
1. Delete "Transformation Leadership Council" or else tell me how I can do it. 2. Would you please tell me how to create a "Transformational Leadership Council" article.
I greatly appreciate your help.
Raymond —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 02:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
WH YDOES EVERYONE KEEP DELETING MY ARTICLES! YES - - I KNOW THEY LOOK LIKE TEST PAGES, GIVE ME TIME TO MAKE THEM INTO ARTICLES FIRST!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Planeteer12 ( talk • contribs) 10:44, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
As of an hour ago, I have obeyed every single rule and I have accepted every suggestion on my article. Would you now please consider reinstating it?
Raymond Aaron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondaaron ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I am so glad you were patient.
Raymondaaron ( talk) 22:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Raymond Aaron
Dear Peter ...
I have been authorized by The Transformational Leadership Council to post an article. But, every time I attempt to do so, I get shown Jack Canfield's article. He was the founder of TLC. But, I have deleted all reference to TLC in his article so that I can post a whole new article for TLC. Yet, even though all references have been deleted, I still get sent to his page when I attempt to create a new article.
This is frustrating.
How can I create a new article for Transformational Leadership Council?
Raymondaaron ( talk) 22:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Raymondaaron
One of the opposes was indented, so posting a query to make certain you're aware you promoted a nomination as consensus support while it actually had 3 supports and 2 opposes. Durova Charge! 03:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Um - are you sure?? I was just looking at this one when it went ..... I was just thinking AFD... Pedro : Chat 09:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, after you locked the JF-17 article a few days ago the vandalism stopped, but the article is now unlocked and is being edited again with incorrect information. The user with IP address 24.87.45.232 keeps changing the specifications section with information from an unreliable source that is different to what all other sources say. The user has never used the discussion section at all to discuss changes, he/she just keeps making edits. Is there any chance that you can lock the article again, or perhaps take action against this user? Hj108 ( talk) 14:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You deleted the article Nuke the fridge and prevented recreation. However a new article Nuking the fridge has been created, to which Nuke the fridge is an obvious redirect. Therefore, would it be possible for you to recreate the page as a redirect, and then lock it?
Alternatively, you may decide that the Nuking the fridge article is an attempt to circumvent the deletion of the Nuke the fridge article. (I would probably agree with this.) However, even if is the case, there is an obvious contradiction between an article existing under one name, and it being blocked under another name.
Regards,
— Hyperdeath( Talk) 17:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
protect Total Drama Action again. I am sorry for asking again after it's last protection just expired, but since then there have been around 75 edits, probably half of them vandalism or deletion of pages, plus unofficial rumors being put up every 5 minutes. Greatly, greatly appreciated- TDI19 ( talk) 21:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 21:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there :) I saw your offer for help on the editor assisstance page. I wondered if you could possibley help me with the discussions on the leeds page. I feel the page is in breach of core policies, and I would like an experienced editor in this field to see if they feel this is true, and if so to advice on what steps to take. I have brought up the core policy issues, as have numerous admins and editors involved in the discussion, and such assertions are never refuted, yet the article remains in status quote, and any changes that address the core policy issues is reverted. Hope you can offer your experience, thankyou -- Razorlax ( talk) 22:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Ada High School (disambiguation), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Ada High School (disambiguation) is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (
CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Ada High School (disambiguation), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 08:20, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
can you please protect Tupac Amaru Shakur's article on a higher level some how. there has been a lot of vandalism, probably due to the film "notorious" coming out in the cinema's about the notorious B.I.G (one of tupac's main rival) and i think fans have been vandalizing the page as a sort of relaliation for notorious big's side. i would be very thankful if you protected it even more as i have had to edit the page many times and the vandals carry on vandalizing the article. thanks 04dejand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 04dejand ( talk • contribs) 20:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I was wondering if you were monitoring the recreated article and the promotional activities of the eponymous editor? Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 20:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
←I fired a large warning shot on hos talk page and ripped a lot of spam and POV stuff out of the article and some of the other articles. I have seen evidence of restraint, though I think it and the related articles are very advert-like. I think we still need to keep an eye. Especially the links, which appear to go directly to "buy buy buy" pages. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I am RAYMOND AARON. I am doing my best to be a good Wikipedia contributor. I listened carefully to Peter's comments and obeyed them. I have done my best to delete all opinions and all "blatant advertising". I am proud to have a Wikipedia article and I do intend to obey all rules. You have requested CITATIONS for my athletic achievements. Some of them occurred before computers and really there is no online record. This pertains to my marathons and my ultramarathon and my caving and alpine club. I do have a photograph of riding my 5-foot-tall "giraffe" unicycle and I have posted that as proof that I can ride it. However, I will never be able to provide CITATIONS for achievements that occurred before computers began recording information online. I would really appreciate your removing the CITATION REQUESTS for those athletic achievements for which there is no independent verification. Raymondaaron ( talk) 14:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Raymond Aaron
I believe this image was deleted on an incorrect basis. The request by Madeofstars was per Wikipedia:CSD#G7: "Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith". As I understand it, this criterion is a discretionary one, not mandatory. The image was in use in three articles and as it is a historic image (i.e. from 2003) it is not replacable. The user put it in article space, when it was first uploaded on 6 December 2008. [1] Furthermore, on 17 December 2008, he reinstated it after a deletion of the image was reversed. [2]
Two months later, he decides he wants it deleted, but has not given any reason why this should happen. The file upload page [3] under step 2 "free license" says in bold, "This release is not revocable." The norm is that we do not allow material, once released under a free licence, to be removed. This is especially the case when it is incorporated into articles.
I am not asking for the image to be undeleted, as it is already on Commons, so would need to be deleted for that reason anyway. The user does not seem to have realised this, as the new name for the image had not been put in the article to replace the old one (I have now done this). However, I request that you inform the uploader Madeofstars that this was the only legitimate reason for its deletion, and that he has given a licence that the upload page clearly states "is not revocable", so he should not normally expect such deletion requests to be met.
Ty 03:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
FYI, there is now more on this at User talk:Tyrenius#Stella Vine and Rosy Wilde photos, Commons:User_talk:Geni#Madeofstars and User_talk:Madeofstars#Photos_of_stella_vine_and_her_gallery. Ty 06:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter, I reverted the page because of a long list of what appeared to be trivia added. It wasn't sourced, and I wasn't going to track down the individual items. This was the version I reverted, and it looks like it may be a well meaning very new user who is editing, so I didn't create his talk page or anything. When you have a moment, could you look at it and advise me on any different measures I should have taken. Thanks — Ched ( talk) 14:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by J Milburn, on behalf of the judges. 20:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Can you block editing talk page? Versus22 talk 21:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
I posted somebody for vandalism. You noticed that there weren't any warnings. The reason is because I'm not interested in giving out warnings. I just brought that user to the attention of administrators. Should I have done that on another page? Anyway, if you want to take care of it, there's Special:Contributions/92.12.36.59 also, apart from the Special:Contributions/4.88.20.100 I mentioned there. Debresser ( talk) 08:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter ...
I read your communication with Fiddle Faddle and I am doing my best to comply.
I have just revised the article again deleting every single objection you could possibly have. I have deleted ALL my athletic accomplishments (except Polar Race since you did not object to that as it has a citation).
I even deleted reference to my own website www.Aaron.com even though you did not object to that.
There is nothing left to do. It seems to me it is totally clean.
Would you PLEASE remove the objectionable notice at the top of my page about COI? Please.
Raymondaaron ( talk) 14:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Raymond Aaron
Dear Peter,
ITS is an organization and one of the most renowned platform for young creativity, we have a large press coverage from international press, see our press page http://www.itsweb.org/jsp/en/presstype/type_1_edition_5.jsp and I think it can be an informative page for who is looking for opportunities for young talents and anyway we are not taking space from others or creating fake or just adv pages.
If you think it can work I will try to write the text with a more encyclopedic style. Thanks pablo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobbaccio ( talk • contribs) 11:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Raymond Aaron, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Aaron. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 15:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thanks again for protecting Total Drama Action. I was wondering if you could protect Dancing with the Stars (U.S. Season 8) please. People keep unofficially pairing professionals with celebrities. Thanks- TDI19 ( talk) 23:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 00:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Umm, I'm actually kind of glad you semi-protected the dwts season 8 page, but I'm confused. It says in the wiki policy that semi-protected pages can only be edited by users who have autoconfirmed their accounts. Well, uhh, I autoconfirmed my account, and I still can't edit the page when logged in. Explanation? Help? Thanks
Mallory, onesmallnote —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onesmallnote ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I've just reverted several vandal edits for contribs 195.194.86.166 (a school). I don't know the procedures, so I'm hoping you will deal with it appropriately. Thanks. -- Johnuniq ( talk) 11:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter. I have a bit of a problem. this edit concerns me. I admit that I have the Larry Sanger page in my watch list, and I have contributed greatly to the talk page. I came across the whole thing back in mid-January through an RfC, and attempted to make changes around the 15th of January, but I'm getting bogged down in my own thoughts here. Anyway - the issue that I have a problem with is that QuackGuru insists that the following be included as such (even though another editor attempted to include the information in a more rational manner)
(from article) While Citizendium is wiki-based, several aspects set it apart from Wikipedia:
Primarily the statement that "Wikipedia seeks consensus and not truth" is placed in a comparison that makes it appear to be a fact, rather than what some OP-ED columnist wrote (my thoughts are WP:SYN). (end paste)
The whole issue has been through 3O, RfC, and WP:WQA recently, and nothing has been accomplished. I admit, I'm relatively new (mid-Nov.), so I am open to suggestions. The editor (QuackGuru) has been around for quite some time, and due to his block log, I would imagine he/she is familiar to many editors. I honestly believe that his/her edits to the article are degrading the quality of the article. Since this is not only a BLP, but a BLP of a founding member (exact definition isn't an issue with me) of Wikipedia - I would think that the article would be important.
Peter, I respect your opinion here - and if you feel it's best for me to just walk away from the whole thing I will. I think the article is important, and my first instinct was to revert and tag QuackGuru with a vandal notice, but I doubt that would accomplish anything. I would greatly appreciate any advise you could offer on this. — Ched ( talk) 11:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I have been trying to advise him and finding that there is a disconnect between my advice, which he says he is grateful for, and his actions. He is currently ojn a roll editing references into the article in what looks like a flurry of desperation, but without checking the end product, and seems not to be aware of the issues. I am taking a pace back form this because it is actually heart rending. You were kind enough to advise him before me, and I hope you can bring fresh eyes!
At the end we may well have a salvageable article, and a lot of that will be down to him, but... HELP! Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 17:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Peter,
Can you help me? I would like to appear here as a hungarian vibist. Why did you delete my page, copyrights, syntactic errors ... ?
Thanks in advance,
Richard Szaniszlo, vibist —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.66.156.52 ( talk) 23:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
I was going through Let It Be... Naked and I saw that at the end it says "Cite error: ref tags exist, but no references/ tag was found." I have limited citation experience, but I tried a few things to fix it (without saving my changes). I don't understand how to fix this. I've seen it before, and I'd like to know how to handle it. Thank you. Belasted ( talk) 01:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the fixes. -- Dweller ( talk) 12:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Peter - I don't want to get in a squabble over this on the talk page, but it probably would have been better to add the 'under discussion' tag and leave the 'policy' tag off. there's just too much aggravation over this page for it to pretend to the kind of consensus that policy is supposed to have. just my two cents, and my apologies if I dropped you into the middle of a quagmire. -- Ludwigs2 02:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter, thanks for the ACC, and I'll make sure I read through everything before I actually do anything. ;). By the way, don't you ever sleep? .. lol. .. I see that admin Moni3 has been working with an editor I had questions about recently. That's great! I tried, I really did, and I think the talk page does reflect that, but the important thing is the article seems to have settled down for now (thank goodness).
While I'm here - I've seen several editors mention "gwarp", but I can't find info on it. What is a gwarp or gwarping? — Ched ( talk) 13:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Are you sure this edit was the right thing to do? Looking back at the previous few edits, I noticed that 1nt2 ( talk · contribs) replaced the previous {{ pp-semi-indef}} template with a {{ editprotected}} template, and the page logs suggest the page is still under semi-protection. Astronaut ( talk) 13:26, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I have finally finished the prep work for Fielding. Here is a list of things I need you and NuclearWarfare to complete. If there are any questions about individual sections, missing info, etc, just contact me and I will provide the bulk. I basically need help with all the formatting. Right now, I am keeping everything on one page (the individual plays sections right now). Wikilinks, leads, summaries (for the "early plays" page) and formatting are the primary concerns. Any work is a help, and remember, this will be 15 pages (plus one more about the 1733 Actor's Rebellion, which I will put together tomorrow). Thanks and sorry for the delay. Ottava Rima ( talk) 03:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Whacking with a wet trout or trouting is a common practice on Wikipedia when experienced editors slip up and make a silly mistake. It, along with
sentencing to the village stocks, is used to resolve one-off instances of seemingly silly behavior amongst normally constructive community members, as opposed to long term patterns of
disruptive edits, which earns
warnings and
blocks.
The
IRC cabal has discovered that you have given
a user, rollback, when they aren't yet autocomfirmed. Please accept this slap as way of thanks. ;)
Thankyou,
Foxy Loxy
Pounce! 04:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC) with CWii's approval
CWii(
Talk|
Contribs) 04:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi, I was curious about your putting only semiprotection on Reggaeton, given that one of the edit warriors is a registered user. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 03:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi again. I would like to thank you so much with all your help with the Total Drama articles, but it is annoying me that established users are now vandalizing it and using it for personal predictions, and I do not know what we should do about it. I was also wondering if I could be a rollback. I am really responsible, and want to keep Wikipedia clean and informative, and I think I will do a great job as one. Thanks again for everything!!!- TDI19 ( talk) 19:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Peter,
The Bachelor Season 13 is getting closer and closer to the season finale and people keep vandalizing the page. Is there any way you could semi-protect it? I'd really appreciate it. It's getting tiring to keep deleting the same vandalism over and over again. Onesmallnote ( talk) 02:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey. As I noticed you were the blocking administrator in this recent sockpuppet case, I have to come to you. This is kind of embarassing since I'm the one who filed both the SPI and a few different ANI threads...
The Checkuser came back saying that LGOutcast =/= Lizard1000. However, Lizard1000 was blocked as a sock of LGOutcast per the duck test [4]. Now he's been cleared by CheckUser. Lizard1000 and Koskidzrules1 were the same person, but if Lizard1000's block was wrong, what does that mean for the guy?
I'm not at all sure where to proceed from here, but I wanted to bring all this to your attention. McJeff ( talk) 07:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Dear Peter I posted a comment on your ban on International Talent Support and I would like to know if it would be possible to create the International Talent Support voice again in a more informative way. If you think it is worth I can submit the content to you first to check if it can be interesting for wikipedia users. Any suggestion is welcome thanks pablo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobbaccio ( talk • contribs) 11:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi - can you protect the Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose International Airport article again? You had done so previously, and now that the prttection's expired, the IP user is up to the same tricks again. Thanks! Jasepl ( talk) 19:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Peter,
You've protected {{ val}}, which I created and still continue to develop. I have a change that's needed to fix an alignment issue (see Template_talk:Val#Uncertainties_alignment_.28in_the_.2B_x_-_y_case.29. for details). Is it possible to grant me write-access to this template? If not, can you make the modification as specified on the talk page for me?
SkyLined
{
talk
contribs 15:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)That didn't take long. :). Dloh cierekim 21:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
I only just spotted that you got the mop back and am very glad to hear it. Had I seen your RfA I'd have supported, but looks like you had no shortage. Congrats and best wishes, Ka renjc 21:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The ARCHIVE UR TALK PAGE barnstar | ||
ARCHIVE UR TALK PAGE. Kthxbai. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC) |
Doesn't that fact that I had one support from an independant wikipedia entry make it hard to justify using WP:SNOW. I was answering complaints and they never had a chance to respond. I thought my RFA was legitement and while was a though battle I wouldn't say it had no chance in hell of getting through. Such a decision seemed arbitary. I would encourage you to reconsider if that is at all possible or at least respond to me. -- AresAndEnyo ( talk) 19:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Peter - Thank you! However, the sock had removed the text moments before your protection - if I revert the page, will that remove the protection? Eagle Rock, Los Angeles, California Or do you need to do the reversion, and then re-protect the page? Thanks in advance. Timmccloud ( talk) 20:28, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
[5] Patton t/ c 00:29, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
←Well, all water under the bridge now. ;).. and when I see some kids hangin out at the mall, saggin pants, dopin' it up, and I start to worry for my grandkids future - I can come here, and see what great gifts, hard work, and tremendous thought also comes from the young generation - and I don't worry quite so much anymore. Keep up the good work ;) — Ched ( talk) 14:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
After being denied 2 times, could to help me with some tips to acquire rollback rights?-- Vinni3 ( talk) 12:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I note in the conclusion to the Homeboy99 sockpuppet case you report that all have been blocked. However, it would appear that Homeboy100 ( talk · contribs), has somehow been overlooked. The user has continued to vandalize the David Suzuki article [6] [7], introducing the very same unreferenced claims as in the past. Thanks for looking into this. Victoriagirl ( talk) 14:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, i'm contacting you concerning this:
The sock puppet that was blocked today (February 21) has returned yet again, has self-identified as a new incarnation of a blocked ID, and has left some very interesting comments, including a question for Wikipedia administrators. Here are excerpts:
This sounds as if the sock puppeteer is a high officer in the company (the Burke Group). After months of interaction with several incarnations of this individual, that would not surprise me at all.
And, the new sock puppet expresses the intent to ignore the block by using the new identity to edit.
I think it may be time for an administrator's intervention beyond blocking for sock puppetry. I'm not sure how that should come about, but this individual seems to consider many other editors to be ideological enemies, so a resolution may require some sort of escalation.
thanks very much, Richard Myers ( talk) 04:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Peter,
Thanks for your prompt reply for my request for rollback permissions. I will take your advice and work at it for a few more weeks. My main reason for the request is that I am currently using a tool
WikiGuard which is for OS X to catch and undo vandalism, wanted to start doing some work from my PC, but the only tool that seams to be worth it is
Huggle, but I will keep it up. I have been running a deployment of MediaWiki for a large company for a while now (it is amazing how much vandalism can be caused in a company) It is nice to start "sinking my teeth" in on a much larger base of information, and users.
--
Djcam (
talk) 23:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting Charm School Gives Back. It has been recreated in the past few minutes, then blanked, then tagged, then blanked, ... Also, what is the policy for a user keeping a copy of the page as his/her own userpage User: Charm School Gives Back? I thought that this was one of the things a userpage was not supposed to be used for (i.e., instead use a sandbox). Thanks! Plastikspork ( talk) 00:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
In the interest of saving time, maybe the unblock request template could have a top-ten excuses checklist for vandals and socks who deny wrongdoing. Some possible entries they could select from:
Maybe I'll pose this idea on WP:ANI. Or maybe NOT. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 19:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
←LMFAO ??? <*searchin for reply *> I got nothin — Ched ( talk) 00:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
And just today, here's an indef-blocked user that wants someone to tell him how to evade checkuser in the future: [10] Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 20:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I see that you are deleting CSD images. I tagged a great many this night, so if you have any questions or issues feel free to leave me a message. Hopefully I wasn't so tired that I did anything stupid... Have a good day! ~ JohnnyMrNinja 11:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
What exactly do I need to do to put the image from Robert Owen's website on his Wikipedia page. I have permission from him to place it on Wikipedia.
SOURCE: http://owens2008.com/home/about-robert/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Owens —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitacore ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
What exactly do I need to do to put the image from Robert Owen's website on his Wikipedia page. I have permission from him to place it on Wikipedia.
SOURCE: http://owens2008.com/home/about-robert/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Owens —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitacore ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I hate to trouble you, but I'm in a bit of a rush. I can't remember where to go to suggest someone be blocked. But this editor has had their last warning, and continues to vandalize: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jigsaw1819 Thank you.
While we're on the subject... Is there a template or something to use to tell editors to stop vandalizing, etc.? Are they restricted to administrators? Sorry, I am a constructive editor, but I have trouble with all the little things, I can't read everything under the sun. Belasted ( talk) 01:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
would you take a look at the graphic on Solar power in Romania. At first I thought it was a prank cause it just looks like a fish - but I don't know. thanks — Ched ( talk) 18:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering how do you apply to become a rollback. Thanks- TDI19 ( talk) 00:53, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the semi-protection. Her article needed it. :) Acalamari 19:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Peter,
We've noticed your comments in the discussion page on the Lafayette Morehouse wikipedia entry, and wondered if you could give us some advice. We are members of the community that is discussed on that page - we've created Wikipedia user accounts that disclose our status so that our "conflict of interest" is public.
The entry about our community was written by others - largely by Zoticogrillo who identifies himself as not a member of our community. Although the article is overall positive, it contains a very large number of errors both favorable and critical. We would like to revise it in a wholesale fashion to correct those, and to try and do this in a balanced fashion. Not all of the subject matter under discussion has secondary / citable sources, so we are unsure how to document each point, the one scholarly paper published about the community contains many footnotes of the type "conversations with <person name>, on date" - is this allowable as a reference?
Since wikipedia is a community effort, in a certain sense no one is "in charge" so we aren't sure how to proceed.
We've posted two questions in the discussion page - you'll find a comment from MoreOceana and myself (80guy), no one has responded.
We've read some of the many FAQ - the one about biographies of living persons, the one about "article subjects" (ie the subject of the article is us)
You advice in this matter is appreciated.
Thanks 80Guy -- 80 Guy (George) ( talk) 22:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80 guy ( talk • contribs) 02:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Smratlik ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Good block. The Pioneer Courthouse stuff aside, he was quickly proving to be a contentious user and probably would have been nailed in the near future just for that. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 21:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for tossing me the rollback feature. Not sure how I got nominated, but I greatly appreciate it. Going to give Huggle a shot so hopefully I can be of even more help. Thanks again! Gnowor ( talk) 21:59, 28 February 2009 (UTC)