Hello, O.Koslowski, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place Again, welcome! Acalamari 09:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC) reply

{{help me}} I was wondering why you deleted my edits to the Tear down this wall page because I thought they were good contributions to Reagon's Speech in rhetorical terms. The wiki page was missing how much the words “tear down this wall” was such a huge move in rhetoric. Thus, I felt like there needed to be a section talking about the importance of it and how it is such a impactful decision made by Reagan to keep it in his speech. He utilized many aspects of rhetorical processes influenced by the Sophists in his own, very influential way. Thus, it is important that the wall should be talked about by itself on the speech’s wiki page. Also, The reason I wanted to add a little more to the legacy section is because I felt like not enough was written in the original version in terms of how impactful Reagan’s speech was despite its ambiguity in its influence in actually bringing down the wall. By explaining how Reagan’s words were actually impactful in terms of peacefully earning the trust of Gorbachev rather than putting him down is important information. It shows how Reagan utilized the right moment (Kairos) used the appropriate words in his speech (Prepon) and showed to the people of Germany and Gorbachev especially a new possible peaceful world without the wall of suppression (Dynaton)

Hi O.Koslowski, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 08:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Still waiting on your cite re: Mark Weber. I'm not holding my breath. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.49.183 ( talk) 14:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

I am reporting you for editorial misconduct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.183.49.183 ( talk) 14:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit on the page Pharmacist was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Conny ( talk) 15:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For constantly reverting vandalism. A520 | Talk me away!/ sign it! 17:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much! The amount of vandalism in this particular Wikimedia project is staggering, but I try to help. o.O O.Koslowski ( talk) 17:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Your recent editing history at State-sponsored terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. lTopGunl ( talk) 12:26, 1 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Yeah, right. An IP doesn't react to anything on the talk page, makes a claim that does not fall into WP:BLUE and I get warned for being in an edit war? o.O O.Koslowski ( talk) 13:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC) reply

There's no excuse for edit war even when you are discussing or right. Crossing 3RR gets you a quick block .I've replied on my talkpage and the article. Feel free to continue the discussion at article talk. -- lTopGunl ( talk) 13:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC) reply

thanks O.Koslowski for helping, even if topGun don't understand! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.20.172 ( talk) 10:00, 20 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Scott Speedman did NOT return for the fourth film in the underworld series.

The character "Michael" was in fact played by a random lookalike and wasn't even credited (to my knowledge) in the film.

Checkout IMDB if you think I am making this up, but Scott Speedman did NOT return for the fourth film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.220.30 ( talk) 19:47, 8 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Feel free to change it to "unknown actor" if you want, or whatever else you like. But it certainly was not Scott Speedman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.220.30 ( talk) 19:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	That's some quality Twinkling! Keep up the good work. Yunshui  雲‍ 水 13:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Dear O.Koslowski,

I try to correct some information that incorrect on the page but I got warning at all time that I write it as advertising which I only try to correct the data; Do you have any suggestion?

Best Regards,

New User — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.47.114.141 ( talk) 16:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, O.Koslowski. You have new messages at TopGun's talk page.
Message added 05:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. reply

Then remove the other sites as well and not just mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.20.216.166 ( talk) 14:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Ok...Dear, I'll not use HTML

-- 61.245.172.49 ( talk) 14:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Are you paid by Channel 10? Have you seen the show? Please check the news paper articles which back up the edits that arent made by Channel 10. Google The Shire and check the articles yourself. Sydney Telegraph.. 7 out of 15 not from the shire for starters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.128.16.6 ( talk) 10:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply

I am not paid by Channel 10. I do hoever believe that you should keep your opinions out of articles and refrain from adding unsourced POV. O.Koslowski ( talk) 10:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply

I have added 3 verification for the comments now.. hope that's suitable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.128.11.189 ( talk) 11:05, 21 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Why do you think so that this is not neutral point of view? I have put my best efforts to write the same and to my best knowledge, it is right and having no biases. Also I have take refereces from many books to draft the same. Kindly revert your changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.125.89.128 ( talk) 16:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply

If you feel so, you can help to edit the article and make it so called from "newtral point of you". Reverting content completely making so much insulting to the new user like me. If similar thing would have happened with you, would you like that? What would have been your immd. reaction? It would be great if you help me in this.... I have also reference from many books including below link http://www.bharatadesam.com/people/samartha_ramdas.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.125.89.128 ( talk) 16:36, 27 August 2012 (UTC) reply

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm not sure what you meant about your "beef" and "soap box" message. Enlighten me.

Yeah, right. Your additions to Bonn International School are clearly driven by your desire to improve the article. O.Koslowski ( talk) 15:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Closing, as the requestor is blocked. See User talk:Hl5250dn Dru of Id ( talk) 16:55, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For keeping our encyclopaedia free of vandalism. -- Rsrikanth05 ( talk) 14:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar ( talk) 01:12, 11 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hey,

You recently undid something I added...and although I am not curious why I do think you are incorrect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clown

The guy is a clown. The comment is harsh but appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.69.9 ( talk) 18:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC) reply

His recent activity certainly engages him as a satirist...and his opening credits should read as such...if clown is too harsh in your mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.69.9 ( talk) 18:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Updated page to note his role in satire. References to youtube vids, etc...can be added as needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.134.69.9 ( talk) 19:08, 11 September 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Huggle Barnstar
	That's some top notch Huggling! Keep it up! Yunshui  雲‍ 水 10:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For keeping user talk pages vandalism free! -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, I didnt remove anything from Akçakale article. I dont even use wikipedia so much. And I dont use proxy, how is that happened? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.164.26.235 ( talk) 18:16, 5 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Political positions of Mitt Romney, is on article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Viriditas ( talk) 22:52, 7 October 2012 (UTC) reply

You seem to be getting a lot of IPs vandalising your usepage; would you like me to semi-protect it for you? Yunshui  雲‍ 水 05:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected. I've applied indefinite protection (there are very few instances where any unregistered use would need to make changes to your userpage), but if you ever want it unprotecting, just ask me or any other admin. Cheers, Yunshui  雲‍ 水 06:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm assuming your revert of my CSD tag was an accident, and you were only intending to revert the preceding vandalism. Automatic Strikeout 15:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

That assumption is correct, yeah. Sorry about that! -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 15:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

No problem, I re-tagged it. Automatic Strikeout 15:48, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

"unexplained removal" There is an explanation on the talk page [1].

Its not exactly a valid reason to delete a page, but the deletion is not technically "unexplained". -- The Red Pen of Doom 18:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Sorry, announcing a deletion on the talk page and emptying the article two minutes later is as close to an unexplained deletion as it gets. O.Koslowski ( talk) 18:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for catching the vandalism at Maya Moore SPhilbrick (Talk) 16:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Have you had your short rest yet? ;) I usually wind down in my smoking jacket with a cigar and a large brandy. Lol. All the best mate. Jonty Monty ( talk) 13:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Why did you delete my change? I was in the middle of putting the reference.

Is it because anything that makes slavery not just an African issue less meaningful?

Here is one reference and I can post dozens more if you like

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-irish-slave-trade-the-forgotten-white-slaves/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.227.185.71 ( talk) 18:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply

	Wikipedia cleaner barnstar!
	Don't think your works against vandalism to keep Wikipedia clean is going unnoticed! You earnYou don't just get a barnstar, you earn it for your dedication and tireless contribution! Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:57, 14 October 2012 (UTC) reply

It really is popular belief in my region that Will Reed was worshiped by Oedipus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.60.157 ( talk) 16:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

lol man, chill ;) & all the best  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
117.197.20.172 (
talk) 10:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
reply 

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I really envy you. Every time I am about to press the revert button in Huggle, I get a click sound only to see that it is reverted by either you or Cluebot. I wonder what your internet connection speed is. :-) Keep up the Good work. Anbu121 ( talk me) 17:46, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hey dude. Im glad to talk to you, the person who has interest and investing time on Telugu Language.

Well my addition on the article was not arbitrate, dubious or due to over joy on any rumour. I did my home work on this. Please follow the below Google link.

https://www.google.com.sg/search?q=second+world+alphabet+olympics

I understand from your profile that you are impartial, genuine and honest wiki geek. Let me know if your understanding is different even after you checked the above link. Or if I have to modify anything on my existing quote. I'm open to even take my opinion back as I am unselfish too.

Thanks Koslowski

- Ram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhargavapillalamarri ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Glad you caught those silly edits at Euglena. That page attracts a lot of vandalism.

Cheers, and keep up the great work! Deuterostome ( talk) 01:15, 20 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I am not vandalizing Wikipedia brah. There are no references on the KC BBQ page, I added references and you removed them. Why don't you remove the areas that have no reference!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.67.121 ( talk) 16:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Yeah, you're like the first vandal to visit my talk page and claim that they're not vandals. How utterly original. I reverted this, this and this edit of yours, and it's very obvious that the improvement of the articles was the least of your worries. Please stop wasting our time. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 16:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm not trying to be original, genius, I'm trying to make the KC BBQ page authentic. Someone else vandalized the KC BBQ page by adding unreferenced material, I added a reference to the Lexington BBQ capital and you removed it. Now I am the vandal. That makes sense. Why don't you remove all the false, unreferenced drivel on the page??? BTW, two of those three links went to the same edit, way to go smart guy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.104.67.222 ( talk) 17:59, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Your edit in Impact of health on intelligence (Impairment is so severe in Kansas City, Missouri that underprivileged children actually believe [ City–style barbecue] is the best kind of Barbecue.) has little to do with removing false, unreferenced drivel. And the two edits look alike because you were friendly enough to do them twice. O.Koslowski ( talk) 19:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi Koslovski. The thing is that on the 25th October 7th in the Julian calendar November according to the Gregorian calendar. Fighting in Jakutia were completed on 16 June 1923rd year. A day later integrated into the Soviet Union and it was a complete end of the Russian Civil War. I'll try to put in a reference to the battle Yakuts. Thanks anyway. Hello :) :) :).-- 93.86.145.160 ( talk) 16:57, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Please do so. ;) You know it always looks a bit strange if a referenced date is changed without an explanation. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 16:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I hope it's better this way.-- 93.86.145.160 ( talk) 17:14, 8 November 2012 (UTC) reply

oh u appear so constructive to me right now...so constructive....lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.152.11 ( talk) 19:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

that came out like sarcasm but my constructive was full of love..

full of sweet warm heavy love..:)

Hi, - you just have to google "Fraud Ziinga" and I know it from my own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.155.209.34 ( talk) 19:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

This is precisely the thing I do not have to do. You want to add something, so you need to cite reliable sources. See WP:RELIABLE, WP:OR -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 19:37, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Oh she's so tough, don't you just love her...

I would suggest you go and play somewhere else. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 19:44, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Is that meant to egg me on...or are you serious...its a long night..your call... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.152.11 ( talk) 19:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

you're quiet, you know what quiet means now, don't you, i've already taken my shirt off... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.152.11 ( talk) 19:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

oh Boy..gentleman, that is the end of the show..as you can see... Friday Night,..Big Big Night.....time to get beezee....with the bee....sorry Deee....:))))) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.152.11 ( talk) 19:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

good night...oh god....thank you...thank you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.152.11 ( talk) 19:53, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

No problem my friend, I just wanted people beeing aware, no issue else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.155.209.34 ( talk) 20:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC) And by the way: where are all the reliable sources of the last 5-10 phrases in that very same paragraph? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.155.209.34 ( talk) 20:26, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I have removed them as well, thanks for pointing that out. O.Koslowski ( talk) 20:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I really appreciate it. In the past, I've witnessed Wiki editors go on power trips rather than listen to what a contributor might be saying...so I definitely do appreciate it quite a bit. Thank you! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cat spasms ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

No problem. Just in case you saw the message on your talk page, please ignore it. ;) Decided to take a closer look afterwards. Which I should have done before pressing 'Q'. O.Koslowski ( talk) 20:20, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. I've been monitoring Jason_Witten since I updated it a few days ago with his 754 receptions record. Noticed the update about his early life and your subsequent revert back to my version 'cause of the lack of reference by the anonymous updater. I found this reference from 2009: http://www.baptistcourier.com/3220.article which we could use if it seems good to you. I haven't done a lot of edits on wikipedia yet; I'll take care of this if you want & if the reference seems good to you; otherwise I'll let you add it. Thanks. Gmporr ( talk) 21:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi there. Since you've found the reference, you should give it a shot. Thank you! O.Koslowski ( talk) 21:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I edited the name to the proper spelling. It shows as "Mattrick P. Sloan" when it should be "Matrick P. Sloan". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.86.212 ( talk) 10:19, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply

But he isn't called Mattrick or Matrick but Matt. You would have to cite reliable sources to change that name, especially since IMdB calls him 'Matt'. O.Koslowski ( talk) 10:21, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Each of the Top Gear presenter's wiki pages has a correct entry under "other names". If you watch Top Gear you would know that Jeremy Clarkson's most used nickname is "the Orangutan". I saw this discrepancy and proceeded to fix it. 219.90.244.240 ( talk) 10:46, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Since it's a nickname that's really only used in the show, I do not believe it should be listed under "other names". -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 10:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I don't know that the actions of anon user:65.34.9.44 actually constitute vandalism. They do break formatting rules, but the editor appears to be editing in good faith. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 21:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Please take a look at the state the article was left in by the time I reverted. Now add to that edits like this, and I find it increasingly hard to believe that the editor was editing in good faith. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 05:07, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I saw the state. While it needed to be undone, it was clearly not malicious. The editor was trying to improve the article but doesn't know how to edit. Per WP:VANDAL

"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page."

Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The editor tried his or her luck on more than one article and blanked them completely or large portions of it. Your judgment is that it wasn't malicious, my judgment was that it was malicious. Yeah, I know there is WP:AGF. But there is also the notion that you might want to stop what you're doing if you don't know what you're doing. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 07:54, 13 November 2012 (UTC) reply

hello I am new to this and dont know how to respond to messages so i will respond on here. i find it helpful to find out out who supports what club and i know other people do, just because you are not intereted, doesnt mean nobody else aint interested — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmac83 ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC) reply

I attended classes at Centennial Secondary school for four years, as did my brother before me for a combined twelve years at the school. The motto is most definitely "demitto tua signa," in honour of the NBC television series, Community, of which the principal and superintendent are enthusiasts. On the television show Community, the school, Greendale Community College, motto is "lower your standards." Adapted in its Latin form, it serves its place as the motto for Centennial Secondary School. Please undo the undoing of my change to the page as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.204.94.96 ( talk) 01:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Please stop undoing my changes to the Centennial Secondary School page... you did not attend classes there and thus do not know about it. If i knew how to report things, I would, but I am new to wikipedia. Again, please stop undoing my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.204.94.96 ( talk) 17:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

You did not go to Centennial, and your grammar is ugly.

Also, i made no change regarding the inclusion of Corey Driscoll. if you check, it was not from this computer

I didn't say you made that change. And sorry, but I'm unwilling to play this particular game you're attempting. Have a nice day. O.Koslowski ( talk) 07:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

While you were correct to nominate Samantha Earley for deletion, you did it under the wrong criteria, if you can understand the text of the article, {{ db-nonsense}} does not apply. It should have been tagged with {{ db-attack}} or {{ db-bio}}, I have retagged it as such. Cheers, -- kelapstick^{( bainuu)} 18:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

You're right, {{ db-attack}} would have been correct. Thanks for the feedback! -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 18:50, 24 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello Koslowski,

I am not sure why it's not allowed. I am trying to add the link JPMC.com for useful purpose. I wanted to know if there is anything wrong with that. Although the links are nofollow so I don't want any link juice. I just want to let people know more about the abbreviation JPMC. Let me know what you think... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.47.132 ( talk) 11:57, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your message. Donna Summer was a very prolific star. Can I ask why you don't think adding her death to a list of major music events is important? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.245.41.120 ( talk) 16:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Do you think calling her a "superstar nigger" as you've done here is okay? -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 16:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC) reply

It's good to see people like you cleaning up vandalism so often. I haven't been editing long, but from time to time I go looking for pages to fix. I noticed your frequent cleanup efforts and I just wanted to pass along my thanks! Wateresque ( talk) 16:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply

About the macedonian. It tells me i can't fix it becouse i am new here. It says старомакедонски јазик witch means old macedonian, when its old bulgarian. Can you fix this please? The hole page tells how it is macedonian language etc and its the hole article is filled with non sense... i cant believe someone wrote that!!!

I've gone through my history, and cannot find the British Shipbuilders page that I apparently changed. However, I have had problems with my IP address in the past, as it appears to change infrequently by itself. But I want to make clear that I didn't, and wouldn't, remove that content without a reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.148.216.112 ( talk) 15:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I'll ignore it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.148.216.112 ( talk) 15:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Yes I think you did make a mistake. I think that the information I added is constructive.

Yes I think you did make a mistake. I think that the information I added is constructive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjkskywalker ( talk • contribs) 18:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi! This is User:Thebeggar, you just left a note on your edit of meadowlark cooperative that it should not be removed - please forgive me, I am new at this - how do I amend this story, then? Do I just leave it as it is, and make a note at the bottom? Should I correct the present-tense of the various activities of the cooperative? (moved by — hike395 ( talk) from your user to your talk page, hope that is OK)

you changed my spelling correction in one minute. You could not have possibly researched the topic that fast, and if you even had, you would see that I was correct. Please do not rush to judge corrections on topics that you obviously know nothing about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.207.113.174 ( talk) 20:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply

You need to find something better to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.201.69 ( talk) 20:03, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

How do you research everything so fast? Like honestly, do you have a life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.201.69 ( talk) 20:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

In fact I do have a life. And no research is needed to realize that this is not a constructive edit. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 20:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

You still didnt answer my first question. How do you find everything so fast? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.201.69 ( talk) 20:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

For starters you could take a look at this page. I'm just one of many people who check every edit made. There are tools that help us. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 20:12, 26 January 2013 (UTC

I'm sorry, but that page is giberish to me. And if you have time fo dat, its another point to prove that you have no life. ;)

If you say so. You spend more time with your vandalism than it takes me to undo your crap. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 20:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Yeah, uhhh I'm chilling with some friends at the moment doing that cuz it makes us happy ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.201.69 ( talk) 20:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

That was some legit info, just not on the correct page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.201.69 ( talk) 20:47, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

There are histories about the unethical of listing people have certain views, such as the Hollywood blacklist or The Black Book. Listing is certainly unethical and I don't understand why Wikipedia have that. It's a form of bullying.--Raintwoto 21:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

It is not unethical and your analogy is dead wrong. The list contains scientists who hold certain views. Whether or not the readers agreee or disagree with those particular views does not matter. In fact, we'd weasel our articles if we didn't name people who oppose the view of anthropogenic global warming and instead always said something like "some scientists oppose this view". -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 21:14, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Yes, people who is listed in the list would not be beat to death. But if you are a funding commission, you may be not give funding to whom do the research and has the certain opinion. This will damage science itself and we will never find out the earth is not flat.

To your question, you can cite their researches either than list the names. If the research has problem, we will find out it from the papers they wrote and we can debate. --Raintwoto 21:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Greenland is a part of Europe (Denmark) and therefore not the second largest country in North America unless you specify "geographic North America". Hence my edit. 50.148.203.80 ( talk) 16:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)EAW reply

Thanks for being a vandal fighter.-- I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{ Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply

I would like to know exactly how the contributions I made to McMenamin's page could, as you claim, be considered 'defamatory'.

I look forward to your explanation.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.250.158 ( talk) 17:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

You haven't answered my question. I understand the warning, but why is it potentially "defamatory"? They're your words, not mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.250.158 ( talk) 23:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

The defamatory bit is simply part of the template text. Being able to cite suitable sources is a bedrock principle of Wikipedia, even more so for biographies of living people, as per WP:BLP. What you have called "persistent, petty VANDALISM" in one of your edit summaries is not vandalism, nor is it petty. It's simply following the rules. Rules which have already been pointed out to you on your talk page by user Materialscientist. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 05:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC) reply

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I see your profile doing good reverts on my watchpage all the time. Just wanted to say you're doing a great job with all that vandalism. Thanks! Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 17:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reverting the vandalism (personal attack) on my talk page and I hope the brownie will help you gain the energy you lost while reverting. Thanks again and keep up the great work!!! T4B ( talk) 18:23, 22 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello.

I am sorry I did not see your first message before re-posting to the page. I recently re-edited it to remove my own opinions. It is a statement of facts and events. I hope this lives up to the Wikipedia expectations and if not, please let me know what I can do to. I think it is an important subject that needs to remain and all the facts presented are correct, you can check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.235.185.171 ( talk) 18:29, 22 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Please don't add back unsourced controversial claims, thanks Widefox; talk 00:20, 31 March 2013 (UTC) reply

An unexplained removal of a section containing technical data does not render that (in my eyes credible) data controversial. You are confusing this with the racially motivated section, which I did not re-add. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 06:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Sorry, yes you're right, my mistake. Thanks, keep up the good work. Widefox; talk 10:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Had made an edit on the Pritam page yesterday, and was following it up with references. However, you edited my entries before I could complete the amendments. Post that, I got a message from you on the same. And just at that time, Wikipedia went down for some time. I tried to complete my editing, and then gave up. No sweat :). Have decided to let the amendments be, and just be a Wikipedia reader.

Appreciate your hard work in keeping order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.89.117 ( talk) 15:57, 1 April 2013 (UTC) reply

I emended. This edit to a much better version cpuld younplease point out what i removed that was so bad? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.63.171 ( talk) 15:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reverting the attacks and vandalism on my talk page. Tolly 4 bolly 17:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For patrolling my talk page <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 10:21, 6 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi O.Koslowski, I am looking for volunteers to re-create the link below for all 196 countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States The goal of this project is to map out the global economy. Here is the project page https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_Economic_Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcnabber091 ( talk • contribs) 03:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Malek Mansur Mirza Shao es-Saltaneh was never Prime Minister of Iran. There are no source for it. Please visit this page. ( http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Iran.htm) 109.162.221.182 ( talk) 12:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Please do not falsely accuse other editors of "unexplained" removal of content as you did at Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. The IP editor concerned did in fact explain the reasons which were also, in my opinion, entirely justified. Thank you. Afterwriting ( talk) 15:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Apologies. I now see that the IP editor did a subsequent unexplained delete which I hadn't noticed. Afterwriting ( talk) 15:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC) reply

You recently accused me of being disruptive when I mentioned that Stuart Hall had been convicted of sex crimes against minors. This shows that you support paedophilia. I hope you rot in hell. Everyone needs to know what your views are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.238.84.65 ( talk) 12:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC) reply

for reverting vandalism on my user page...thank you Rob van vee 06:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi I was sent this mentioned "special" contribution while being offline. i have no recollection of ever changing -or knowing of the existence- of this page. Please send me a personal message concerning this matter and possible further consequences. MartianH ( talk) 15:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Since Wikipedia:Steven Clark was not in main (article) space, it was not subject to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, even though it looked like an article. the correct place for a deletion discussion would have been Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. As it happens, it doesn't matter, as I was going to speedily delete it anyway, but I thought I would let you know for any similar occasions in the future. JamesBWatson ( talk) 11:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for letting me know. Wasn't entirely sure. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 11:50, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Not all references to people mentioned in Wikipedia are linked to an article. The article will take me some time to draft, but I need to have a reference to him in the disambiguation article. For an example of a name not linked to an article (see Robert Williams (actor) (1904–1978), acted in A Bird in the Head, Beer Barrel Polecats, Fernwood 2 Night, amongst others). Therefore, I request that you do not delete my entry for a few days while I write the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayzburger ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 7 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello sir, I'm new to wikipedia so i'm sure i'm putting this in the wrong place, my apologies in advance,

in regards to the changes i made on your page about desomorphine i hope the next link will explain for me.

http://gawker.com/flesh-eating-drug-krokodil-is-now-attacking-chicago-sub-1443205547 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plunderfunk ( talk • contribs) 18:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC) reply

He is a YPINO, ie, a Yale Professor In Name Only and he uses his appointment to fool his followers about how "authoritative" his opinions are. I think you should undo your undo for balance. 24.253.64.178 ( talk) 15:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Please take your opinion somewhere else. Wikipedia is not your soap box. O.Koslowski ( talk) 15:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Could you help to translate an article, please ? I need somebody to do it. You can write me a message on my discussion page.

Articles to translate:

• fr:Confédération brésilienne de judo (Brazilian Judo Confederation)
• fr:Confédération brésilienne d'escrime (Brazilian Fencing Confederation)
• fr:Matières utilisées pour fabriquer un film (Materials used to make a film)
• fr:Fédération autrichienne de judo (Austrian Judo Federation)

Say me when you can translate the articles for me.

Thanks. Bye bye.

92.136.136.149 ( talk) 15:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Wow...I put that up and in like 5 seconds you changed it. I apologize for making an incorrect edit, have a nice day and keep doing what you're doing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.158.2.129 ( talk) 15:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Could you help to translate an article, please ? I need somebody to do it. You can write me a message on my discussion page.

Articles to translate:

• fr:Confédération brésilienne de judo (Brazilian Judo Confederation)
• fr:Confédération brésilienne d'escrime (Brazilian Fencing Confederation)
• fr:Matières utilisées pour fabriquer un film (Materials used to make a film)
• fr:Fédération autrichienne de judo (Austrian Judo Federation)

Say me when you can translate the articles for me.

Thanks. Bye bye.

92.136.136.149 ( talk) 15:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC) st st — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.136.136.149 ( talk) 16:39, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Sorry about my mistake. It was a mistake. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.16.85 ( talk) 11:04, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For being so quick to remove vandalism today - keep up the good work! Oddbodz ( talk) 17:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply

You recently left me a message regarding an edit to the "Where's Wally?" page. I made no such edit, so I think you're looking for someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.251.186 ( talk) 23:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC) reply

HI there, I think there's a confusion here between descrigin the origin of shiatsu and who's involved with it, and the criticism of it. There should be a separate section for cricisim, but Ernst is not the best qualified in that area. The books you quote of his actually do not show any research that denies Shiatsu's efficacy so to have a quote from him saying so is wrong. Let's have the historical stuff about shiatsu first then we can have a section about the evidence. No? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankank ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reply

hello, thanks for the undid you had done to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonda_district?diff=546603724 i looks like someone mischievous person had done that, thanks for re-correcting. your information message came on my IP, but it's ok. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.20.172 ( talk) 09:55, 20 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi

Sorry if this is disruptive editing, remove as soon as you have seen it. I recieved a message from you saying that I had edited a College in Irelands' page. I have never heard of the college and certainly did not do that edit. It was disrespectful and disgusting. It deserved to be removed but I did not do it. Kind Regards

ANON — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.127.213.60 ( talk) 12:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi O.Koslowski, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB ( talk) 20:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I wonder why my article was deleted? Since I am a member of the THS martial artists and I feel that I have not break any law of copy rights or et cetera. Thank You.

BP88Lukas ( talk) 08:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Please leave me alone. Stop deleting my posts. - Anonymuse4wiki ( talk) 21:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, thanks for helping keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. I noticed you reported 68.119.73.241 as having vandalized after a final warning. It appears however the user received but a single level-one warning over four days ago. It would be appreciated if you were more honest in your reports to AIV. I have added a level three warning, which I judged to be appropriate given the recent editing history. If the user continues to disrupt feel free to re-report after a level four warning has been issued. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC) reply

that was an honest mistake. However, I would appreciate it if you did not make it sound as if there were a problem with my AIV reports in general. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 22:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I couldn't help but notice that you reverted some of my changes to the Zugszwang article. However, a simple look at the first line of the article shows that it says: "...one player is put at a disadvantage because he must make a move when they would prefer to pass and not to move..." As you can easily see, the one player is first referred to as "he" and later as "they." A determination must be made as to whether the player is a "he" or a "they" and the proper form used throughout the article. Please do not leave it as a mishmash mix of both. Thanks. 190.81.202.250 ( talk) 18:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC) reply

As you have not responded, I have corrected the offending sentence by standardizing it on "he" rather than "they." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.81.202.250 ( talk) 14:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I was a tad busy. Thank you for the edit. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 15:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Ello. Regarding your message here, keep in mind dynamic DNS exists, hah. I'm on Australian ADSL2+ and have just been assigned this IP address and don't know how long I'll have it, either. I didn't make the changes you mentioned. —Preceding undated comment added 03:25, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@ 124.170.213.92: Hi, I am well aware of that. And the footer on IP talk pages states as much. But still IP addreses are contacted via their talk pages. On other projects such as the German-speaking Wikipedia, the talk pages of dynamic IP ranges are cleared after a day to prevent such confusion. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 03:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi, Just so you know, any editor, even IP editors, can remove a CSD tag if they object, except the creator of the article. If they IP editor removes it again, it would be SD'd at AFD. -- allthefoxes ^{( Talk)} 07:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Allthefoxes: I am fairly certain that the IP and the user who wrote the fake article are the same person. I'm getting a little tired of the cross-wiki "Javad Ramzani"-related fakery that has been going on for a few months now. -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 08:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, O.Koslowski. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC) reply

86.184.111.110 ( talk) 21:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC) Excuse me, But I'd appreciate if you did your job properly. I never once visited that page which you messaged me about, and I've never made edits on this site. So no, I do not accept your message. I will not refrain from anything as I did not do anything. 86.184.111.110 ( talk) 21:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC) reply

No, but a year a user using your IP address did, as can be seen from the edit history -- O.Koslowski ( talk) 02:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, O.Koslowski. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐) 20:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The accusation of "loose standards" based on the SCIgen paper incident is completely unfounded and calumnious. The peer review process for this conference is the most rigorous that I have ever heard of. The large treatment of the SCIgen manipulation is a detraction from all the scientific work advanced by the scholars who participate in this conference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.150.237.12 ( talk) 19:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply