This is a Wikipedia
user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nsaa/User_talk_2009. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You recently reverted this edit to Tamira Cole and issued a vandalism warning to User:Esterspirit. Esterspirit was the creator of that page and may have been attempting to request its deletion by blanking the page. (see User talk:Esterspirit) This might not have been apparent in Huggle because he/she made some edits without logging in.
I can't fault you for this because I made the same mistake while using Huggle a few times myself. Just try to be a little more careful. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Well thank. I have a question about Babel templates. I've seen all these accounts with templates and I'm wondering if Wikipedia has a full listing of these templates. Thanks! Gp user ( talk) 04:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
How do you keep Babel in a neat section 'cause mine is just a mess. Thanks! Gp user ( talk) 22:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
{{userboxtop |align = right |left = |backgroundcolor = #FAF8CC; |bordercolor = |extra-css = |textcolor = |toptext = [[Wikipedia:Babel|Babel]] }} {{user no}} {{user en-2}} {{user da-2}} {{user sv-1}} {{user de-1}} {{userboxbreak|toptext=Work}} {{user wikipedia/RC Patrol}} ... {{userboxbottom}}
How do i request for a cleanup or non-delete of Gpirate
Please do not delete Gpirate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinjajames ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thanks nsaa Jinjajames ( talk) 07:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Another little something to add to your collection of barn stars. This is for your good quality AIV reports. Keep it up! ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 17:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I wanted to let you know I declined your report of User:Worldtaekwondofederation. Those edits were IMO not vandalism, rather newbie edits. I didn't see on their talk page an attempt to discuss with them in your own words what you thought was wrong with the edits, did I miss it? It looked to me like they genuinely wanted to improve the article but maybe needed help getting familiar with policies etc. I think it's worth talking to them, since it would be a real shame if we turned away a potentially good editor who just needs some guidance, don't you? I'm happy to discuss it more if you like or to lend help myself. Peace, delldot ∇. 17:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Mr. Nsaa. The Reference About Our Holy Prophet Is Taken From A Western Literature So It Can Be Termed As Biased. Because There Are No Islamic Historical Background About This Reference So Remove It As Soon As Possible. It Is Very Insulting And Very Irrelivent To The Artical Itself And Clearly Shows A Prejudice And Hatred Towards Muslim. I am Starting A Email Compaign. aginst This Article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maleemk ( talk • contribs) 21:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the invite, but I already have a user name. It's Fodient but I have been blocked by the wikibully MastCell. I have to use IP addresses until my incarcation time is complete. 71.255.74.151 ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Nsaa
I just put up a link to commercial-archive.com's superbowl collection. Commercial Archive / Adland is a huge resource for people who research into advertising and is used widely by scholars and advertising schools to study. Here is why I think you should reconsider:
- Commercial Archive is linked from the US Library of Congress.
- They have the worlds largest collection of superbowl ads (37 years)
- They have the 20 best ads before the SuperBowl.
- They adhere to copyright laws. all ads are posted with permission
_ They have been posting SuperBowl ads every year since 1999.
- You link to superbowl-ads.com who only have ten years, not 37 years.
Kind regards, Miklas Njor miklas /©/ miklasnjor.com ( 84.55.67.145 ( talk) 14:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC))
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 21:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Tanks.-- 190.173.200.220 ( talk) 16:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 07:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Please see the download page for the new release of huggle. It should work and should be the only version to work. Thank X clamation point and if you have any questions please get to me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. -- ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 21:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
you sent me a message about the page I emptied, article about Stanley Festus. I am trying to delete the article (I wrote it), because most of the information is invalid, as has come to my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riikamaria ( talk • contribs) 2009-02-22T20:39:27
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 16:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm stating correct fact.
As an FP Member. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrist Instability ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nsaa, your current ER has been open for over 60 days, it has gotten one review. Is it okay if I archive it, or would you like extra time?-- ₮RU CӨ 20:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
download has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
-
down
load |
sign! 02:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Ignore the question on my talk page. I think I figured out what I did. I just needed to spend a minute with the way Wikipedia formats things. I saw the note that I had a message literally a second after I broke a redirect on Bordered and I thought I was in hot water. I am going through the links you gave me, and they are very helpful! Thanks! Guaranamania ( talk) 19:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome! Ballon845 ( talk) 01:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate that you and I seem to be in agreement on this birth/death date template issue. I also know I tend to post rambling responses on it. When I first ran across Messerly, he downplayed what he was doing to such a degree, I was not aware of the ongoing discussion at MOSNUM about the actual templates. Like I outlined, he sort of had agreement from two people about a moratorium on "conversion" to the old templates, although there certainly was no effort to convert anything going on at the time. That made no sense. I have read the discussion they had in February many times, and there was never even a direct discussion about birth/death templates and also from what I can see, there was no consensus to change the MOS to include Messerly's templates. Yet, Messerly submitted the template for change based on consensus and it is already implemented in the MOS and he has put it into the infoboxes for biographies based on "recommended by the MOSNUM". He just did this, no one gave approval for the change and he's lied about having never changed to the template in the article. He has. I'm just reiterating this because when I disagreed with Messerly on [[Talk:WP:BIography]] and asked arbcom about it, he kept insisting it be taken back to MOSNUM. Now that it has, he's kept the discussion focused off what he did to get it in MOS, ignored addressing my direct questions about it, and has muddied the talk with discussion about why his template is superior. I knew this would happen. There is no agreement on the merits of his template, much less consensus, and yet, his endrun around the proper process for changing it isn't being mentioned, except by me. I'm just writing to ask you to notice this way too important detail. I think the first thing that needs to happen is that the template be removed from the MOS because it was never approved by community consensus to be put in. Thanks for your support on the rest of the issues. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 22:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
do you have a life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.11.0.118 ( talk) 18:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Yay!! Finally. I wonder where Messerly disappeared to? In any event, thanks for sticking in there with me. I realize this isn't the last we'll hear of it, but hopefully, whatever happens in the future will be easier to discuss!! Wildhartlivie ( talk) 18:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The reason that I have removed it that it was decided at WP:AIRPORTS ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Destinations_by_Region) that "Destinations by Region" are to be removed. Charmedaddict ( talk) 18:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you did this revert using Huggle. Please remember that reverts/rollback are only for vandalism/bad-faith edits and not good faith edits. If the editor in question has given a good-faith reason for their actions, you should always use undo instead. Regards So Why 06:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Rand Paul has been overhauled. This may affect your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rand Paul. This message is being copied to 8 people. JJB 07:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
You have been quiet on the MOSNUM page, and there is a topic I think you should be aware of. Wjemather has a proposal regarding plain text date support. You have raised objections to plain text dates in any template in the past, so in fairness to your point of view and to avoid a repetition of the past episode I'd like to know if you'd go along with his proposal. If so, perhaps there is a path to consensus on this issue. Thanks - J JMesserly ( talk) 17:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Nsaa, would you please explain to me exactly what this compromise would mean without all the coding jargon? Does this mean you and Wjemather are considering supporting a change to a template using plain text data? If not, what exactly is this proposal? Wildhartlivie ( talk) 00:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The April 2009 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.-- Yannismarou ( talk) 02:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 16:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to see if it was ok if I use your status icon that is on top of your user page. Dont know if it even belongs to you but its the first time I have seen it. Sanders ( talk) 00:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I saw from here that it's been exactly four years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 17:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Passportguy (
talk) 14:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you explain why I cannot ask him a question. I have provided facts that Fleury scores on himself and since he does it multiple times he must enjoy it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.153.171 ( talk) 19:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC) (— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.153.171 ( talk • contribs) 2009-05-31T19:29:01)
Hi Nsaa. You accidentally took your shouting friend's comments off the talk page as well. I've put 'em back - JordanITP is perfectly capable of blanking them hisself. Ta.-- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 19:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC) And I'm sure you'll deal with his shouting majesty below as well-- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 19:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes but he does enjoy scoring on himself. How is that vandalism? I provided proof to support my statement. So, can you provide proof to show that it is false making it illegal to post on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.153.171 ( talk) 21:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
Please be careful when reverting vandalism that you are reverting to a good version. In this revert of Harlem Renaissance (see diff), you unfortunately reverted to a vandalized version. Cheers, JGHowes talk 16:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:IPAEng. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Nsaa ( talk) 18:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 11:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Nothing was removed from the Cornell University page I made improvements that were suggested in the former featured article discussion. I changed the box with information on the colleges so that it was improved and more in line with FA guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.245.248 ( talk) 15:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Stop reverting. The article needs attention, there is something wrong with it. If you are not interested or do not know much about the subject, feel free to stay away from it. Please Read ther article for yourself. You will understand its problem. Thank you. Talk to Magibon 16:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
{{
subst:afd}}
). A full description can be found here
Template:AfD_footer on how to list a article for deletion.
Nsaa (
talk) 16:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you I will try them now. Talk to Magibon 16:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hopefully, this would entice new editors to edit. Plain vandalism has been scaring away prospective editors. Talk to Magibon 17:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the revert of vandalism on Untangle - its much appreciated! Boochaka ( talk) 00:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
You recently posted a warning on my IP user page (129.128.67.22). You should be informed that this is a shared IP address registered to University of Alberta (libraries), and that IP blocks may be inappropriate. I've seen some IP addresses have little notes indicating that they are shared computers, and that may be appropriate in this case. 129.128.67.22 ( talk) 21:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the encouragement ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enfer ( talk • contribs) 08:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Will I get perm ban? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.109.15 ( talk) 08:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I have now logged on as fotoguzzi. Trying to determine what was reverted and why. Thank you. Fotoguzzi ( talk) 18:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 05:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Just testing the edit filter, that seemed to be a very low profile article to test it on.-- Otterathome ( talk) 18:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Was unsure of what to write. Wrote "fixing links" but got sloppy when I messed up on the Captcha a few times and forgot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.67.145 ( talk) 09:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for inviting me. I mainly use the English Wikipedia to add links or grab articles and translate. I 'm quite busy on the Breton Wikipedia [5] and I'm not a native English speaker, so I don't think I'll write on your own wiki. Best regards.-- 90.1.196.52 ( talk) 18:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Err... I didn't attack another contributor, I simply stated that Bernard Hopkins made a well publicised racist statement.
Thanks for catching my talk page! Keep up the reverting. -- Sidonuke ( talk :: contribs) 13:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Very sorry. My bad. Mistook you for the vandalising IP you correctly reverted. All pompous and erroneous nonsense on my part humbly withdrawn. Keep up the good work. RashersTierney ( talk) 23:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor is questioning the lack of sources in the lead for Capitalism. If you would like to discuss this please reply on the talk page. The Four Deuces ( talk) 03:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi - you just changed my wiki entry. I fail to see how it lacks use. Being from the trafford constituency, I am offended you have removed information about a key event in its history. The birth marked 700th year of the altrincham charter - when it was granted status as a free borough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.55.174 ( talk) 20:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
You can't warn me over editing Gaga discography when I removed The Fame Monster. It has been discussed THOUSAND times on her album pages that The Fame Monster isn't a new album and therefore should not be included in her discography as a new one. I'm not removing the "warn" you did to me and you are the unconstructive person to that page. Another user has already reverted the shit you did! -- Zefron12 ( talk) 00:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just to let you know that you restored the wrong version here. I don't know how you managed it, but did you get an alert box saying that the edit was already being reverted? Or that you were undoing a revert by another editor? I think another person got there just before you, something to watch out for! Best Regards, Captain n00dle T/ C 21:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Please note that a user blanking a page they've created is not vandalism. Generally, that's interpreted as a request for G7 speedy deletion. Tag it as such and an admin will delete (of course, if the creator keeps reverting, talk to an admin in person). Thank you! Cheers, Master of Puppets 22:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Please read [6] and note the use of stolen and theft. This is the primary source that has clarified that this is a crime, not a "leak". ► RATEL ◄ 01:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I agree with you regarding the inclusion of the "ClimateGate" reference. I don't know what possible argument could be used to oppose. I saw the edit summary, but it looks like the editor made two changes and the edit summary refers to the "stole" issue.
On ref naming - I like the "reuter20091123" (or better yet "reuters20091123") convention for unambiguous use in URLs, but it is ugly and hard to read by humans, so I prefer a human readable for when humans need to read it. I won't touch the ones you have in that form, but I urge you to weigh in on the talk page, as we have been discussing the referencing, and no one else has objected.-- SPhilbrick T 15:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 15:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Nr | Edit(s) claimed to breaking Wikipedia:3RR | Comments |
---|---|---|
1 | [15] | As far as I can see I've added sources and quotations in these sources. Is this a revert? |
2 | [16] | None of the two references [17] [18] given says Stolen, so adjusting the text to reflect this should be quite obvious. |
3 | [19] | This is not an revert, I add a quotation in the reference for the disputed text ", likely an insider, [1]" with this "quote=Judging from the data posted, the hack was done either by an insider or by someone inside the climate community who was familiar with the debate, said Robert Graham, CEO with the consultancy Errata Security. Whenever this type of incident occurs, "80 percent of the time it's an insider," he said." |
4 | [20] | Restoring "statements that are sourced reliably, written in a neutral narrative, and pertain to the subject at hand." is just an action to restore a "disruptive" action, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Removal_of_sourced_edits_made_in_a_neutral_narrative_is_disruptive |
5 | [21] | Removing references without explanation? As far as I see it's an way of removing the importance of the term) |
6 | [22] | Its not an revert, its an moderation of a prior statement: ", likely an insider according to security experts," (bold what was added in this edit) |
7 | [23] | A revert, but it still falls under whats discussed at point 4 |
8 | [24] | A revert, but it still falls under whats discussed at point 4 |
I did not intend to remove the text. It looks like the person after me User:Chris O was editing there. I explained I did not touch that text at Talk:Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident. I have no opinion on it. Bevo74 ( talk) 17:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I think we might be able to do something. May I ask if you use any instant messengers? We can speak in detail over them. Macai ( talk) 18:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Fair use images cannot be used in talk pages or user pages. -- SPhilbrick T 01:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know, the protection expired a few hours ago for Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident so you don't need to use the editprotected template. One of your requested edits was made by a bot and I removed the template. The other one I removed the edit protected template without making the edit as I feel it may be wise to ensure there's no further controversy over the addition of the primary source. While I obviously won't edit war if you choose to make the propose change, I do feel it wise to wait perhaps one more day Nil Einne ( talk) 08:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
This user vandalized United States Congress. Many warnings. Why are they still allowed to edit?-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 20:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your comment on TS's page regarding this edit. You took offense and asked TS not to change the discussion. However, it is my understanding that TS's refactoring was not only acceptable but is encouraged, as it highlighted the fact that another discussion about Delingpole was in progress. You see, we have at least two prior threads concerning this topic, and it would be nice to know where they all are so we can view the entire discussion as a whole in the archives. Viriditas ( talk) 03:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
There's a lot worth challenging, but noindex of talk pages is quite standard.-- SPhilbrick T 04:52, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Have you seen this: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Climate_Change?
They are still working out the list of parties and whom to notify, so you may yet get formal notification, but just thought I'd make sure you knew.-- SPhilbrick T 18:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is a Wikipedia
user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nsaa/User_talk_2009. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You recently reverted this edit to Tamira Cole and issued a vandalism warning to User:Esterspirit. Esterspirit was the creator of that page and may have been attempting to request its deletion by blanking the page. (see User talk:Esterspirit) This might not have been apparent in Huggle because he/she made some edits without logging in.
I can't fault you for this because I made the same mistake while using Huggle a few times myself. Just try to be a little more careful. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Well thank. I have a question about Babel templates. I've seen all these accounts with templates and I'm wondering if Wikipedia has a full listing of these templates. Thanks! Gp user ( talk) 04:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
How do you keep Babel in a neat section 'cause mine is just a mess. Thanks! Gp user ( talk) 22:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
{{userboxtop |align = right |left = |backgroundcolor = #FAF8CC; |bordercolor = |extra-css = |textcolor = |toptext = [[Wikipedia:Babel|Babel]] }} {{user no}} {{user en-2}} {{user da-2}} {{user sv-1}} {{user de-1}} {{userboxbreak|toptext=Work}} {{user wikipedia/RC Patrol}} ... {{userboxbottom}}
How do i request for a cleanup or non-delete of Gpirate
Please do not delete Gpirate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinjajames ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thanks nsaa Jinjajames ( talk) 07:01, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Another little something to add to your collection of barn stars. This is for your good quality AIV reports. Keep it up! ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 17:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I wanted to let you know I declined your report of User:Worldtaekwondofederation. Those edits were IMO not vandalism, rather newbie edits. I didn't see on their talk page an attempt to discuss with them in your own words what you thought was wrong with the edits, did I miss it? It looked to me like they genuinely wanted to improve the article but maybe needed help getting familiar with policies etc. I think it's worth talking to them, since it would be a real shame if we turned away a potentially good editor who just needs some guidance, don't you? I'm happy to discuss it more if you like or to lend help myself. Peace, delldot ∇. 17:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Mr. Nsaa. The Reference About Our Holy Prophet Is Taken From A Western Literature So It Can Be Termed As Biased. Because There Are No Islamic Historical Background About This Reference So Remove It As Soon As Possible. It Is Very Insulting And Very Irrelivent To The Artical Itself And Clearly Shows A Prejudice And Hatred Towards Muslim. I am Starting A Email Compaign. aginst This Article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maleemk ( talk • contribs) 21:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the invite, but I already have a user name. It's Fodient but I have been blocked by the wikibully MastCell. I have to use IP addresses until my incarcation time is complete. 71.255.74.151 ( talk) 21:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Nsaa
I just put up a link to commercial-archive.com's superbowl collection. Commercial Archive / Adland is a huge resource for people who research into advertising and is used widely by scholars and advertising schools to study. Here is why I think you should reconsider:
- Commercial Archive is linked from the US Library of Congress.
- They have the worlds largest collection of superbowl ads (37 years)
- They have the 20 best ads before the SuperBowl.
- They adhere to copyright laws. all ads are posted with permission
_ They have been posting SuperBowl ads every year since 1999.
- You link to superbowl-ads.com who only have ten years, not 37 years.
Kind regards, Miklas Njor miklas /©/ miklasnjor.com ( 84.55.67.145 ( talk) 14:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC))
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 21:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Tanks.-- 190.173.200.220 ( talk) 16:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 07:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Please see the download page for the new release of huggle. It should work and should be the only version to work. Thank X clamation point and if you have any questions please get to me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. -- ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 21:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
you sent me a message about the page I emptied, article about Stanley Festus. I am trying to delete the article (I wrote it), because most of the information is invalid, as has come to my knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riikamaria ( talk • contribs) 2009-02-22T20:39:27
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 16:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm stating correct fact.
As an FP Member. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrist Instability ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:29, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello Nsaa, your current ER has been open for over 60 days, it has gotten one review. Is it okay if I archive it, or would you like extra time?-- ₮RU CӨ 20:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
download has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
-
down
load |
sign! 02:05, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. Ignore the question on my talk page. I think I figured out what I did. I just needed to spend a minute with the way Wikipedia formats things. I saw the note that I had a message literally a second after I broke a redirect on Bordered and I thought I was in hot water. I am going through the links you gave me, and they are very helpful! Thanks! Guaranamania ( talk) 19:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your welcome! Ballon845 ( talk) 01:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate that you and I seem to be in agreement on this birth/death date template issue. I also know I tend to post rambling responses on it. When I first ran across Messerly, he downplayed what he was doing to such a degree, I was not aware of the ongoing discussion at MOSNUM about the actual templates. Like I outlined, he sort of had agreement from two people about a moratorium on "conversion" to the old templates, although there certainly was no effort to convert anything going on at the time. That made no sense. I have read the discussion they had in February many times, and there was never even a direct discussion about birth/death templates and also from what I can see, there was no consensus to change the MOS to include Messerly's templates. Yet, Messerly submitted the template for change based on consensus and it is already implemented in the MOS and he has put it into the infoboxes for biographies based on "recommended by the MOSNUM". He just did this, no one gave approval for the change and he's lied about having never changed to the template in the article. He has. I'm just reiterating this because when I disagreed with Messerly on [[Talk:WP:BIography]] and asked arbcom about it, he kept insisting it be taken back to MOSNUM. Now that it has, he's kept the discussion focused off what he did to get it in MOS, ignored addressing my direct questions about it, and has muddied the talk with discussion about why his template is superior. I knew this would happen. There is no agreement on the merits of his template, much less consensus, and yet, his endrun around the proper process for changing it isn't being mentioned, except by me. I'm just writing to ask you to notice this way too important detail. I think the first thing that needs to happen is that the template be removed from the MOS because it was never approved by community consensus to be put in. Thanks for your support on the rest of the issues. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 22:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
do you have a life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.11.0.118 ( talk) 18:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Yay!! Finally. I wonder where Messerly disappeared to? In any event, thanks for sticking in there with me. I realize this isn't the last we'll hear of it, but hopefully, whatever happens in the future will be easier to discuss!! Wildhartlivie ( talk) 18:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
The reason that I have removed it that it was decided at WP:AIRPORTS ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Destinations_by_Region) that "Destinations by Region" are to be removed. Charmedaddict ( talk) 18:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you did this revert using Huggle. Please remember that reverts/rollback are only for vandalism/bad-faith edits and not good faith edits. If the editor in question has given a good-faith reason for their actions, you should always use undo instead. Regards So Why 06:51, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Rand Paul has been overhauled. This may affect your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rand Paul. This message is being copied to 8 people. JJB 07:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
You have been quiet on the MOSNUM page, and there is a topic I think you should be aware of. Wjemather has a proposal regarding plain text date support. You have raised objections to plain text dates in any template in the past, so in fairness to your point of view and to avoid a repetition of the past episode I'd like to know if you'd go along with his proposal. If so, perhaps there is a path to consensus on this issue. Thanks - J JMesserly ( talk) 17:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Nsaa, would you please explain to me exactly what this compromise would mean without all the coding jargon? Does this mean you and Wjemather are considering supporting a change to a template using plain text data? If not, what exactly is this proposal? Wildhartlivie ( talk) 00:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
The April 2009 issue of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.-- Yannismarou ( talk) 02:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 16:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to see if it was ok if I use your status icon that is on top of your user page. Dont know if it even belongs to you but its the first time I have seen it. Sanders ( talk) 00:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:00, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I saw from here that it's been exactly four years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 17:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Passportguy (
talk) 14:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 13:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Can you explain why I cannot ask him a question. I have provided facts that Fleury scores on himself and since he does it multiple times he must enjoy it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.153.171 ( talk) 19:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC) (— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.153.171 ( talk • contribs) 2009-05-31T19:29:01)
Hi Nsaa. You accidentally took your shouting friend's comments off the talk page as well. I've put 'em back - JordanITP is perfectly capable of blanking them hisself. Ta.-- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 19:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC) And I'm sure you'll deal with his shouting majesty below as well-- Elen of the Roads ( talk) 19:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes but he does enjoy scoring on himself. How is that vandalism? I provided proof to support my statement. So, can you provide proof to show that it is false making it illegal to post on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.176.153.171 ( talk) 21:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello,
Please be careful when reverting vandalism that you are reverting to a good version. In this revert of Harlem Renaissance (see diff), you unfortunately reverted to a vandalized version. Cheers, JGHowes talk 16:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:IPAEng. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Nsaa ( talk) 18:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 11:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Nothing was removed from the Cornell University page I made improvements that were suggested in the former featured article discussion. I changed the box with information on the colleges so that it was improved and more in line with FA guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.245.248 ( talk) 15:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Stop reverting. The article needs attention, there is something wrong with it. If you are not interested or do not know much about the subject, feel free to stay away from it. Please Read ther article for yourself. You will understand its problem. Thank you. Talk to Magibon 16:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
{{
subst:afd}}
). A full description can be found here
Template:AfD_footer on how to list a article for deletion.
Nsaa (
talk) 16:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you I will try them now. Talk to Magibon 16:35, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hopefully, this would entice new editors to edit. Plain vandalism has been scaring away prospective editors. Talk to Magibon 17:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the revert of vandalism on Untangle - its much appreciated! Boochaka ( talk) 00:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
You recently posted a warning on my IP user page (129.128.67.22). You should be informed that this is a shared IP address registered to University of Alberta (libraries), and that IP blocks may be inappropriate. I've seen some IP addresses have little notes indicating that they are shared computers, and that may be appropriate in this case. 129.128.67.22 ( talk) 21:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the encouragement ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enfer ( talk • contribs) 08:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Will I get perm ban? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.109.15 ( talk) 08:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I have now logged on as fotoguzzi. Trying to determine what was reverted and why. Thank you. Fotoguzzi ( talk) 18:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 12:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 05:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Just testing the edit filter, that seemed to be a very low profile article to test it on.-- Otterathome ( talk) 18:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Was unsure of what to write. Wrote "fixing links" but got sloppy when I messed up on the Captcha a few times and forgot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.67.145 ( talk) 09:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for inviting me. I mainly use the English Wikipedia to add links or grab articles and translate. I 'm quite busy on the Breton Wikipedia [5] and I'm not a native English speaker, so I don't think I'll write on your own wiki. Best regards.-- 90.1.196.52 ( talk) 18:03, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Err... I didn't attack another contributor, I simply stated that Bernard Hopkins made a well publicised racist statement.
Thanks for catching my talk page! Keep up the reverting. -- Sidonuke ( talk :: contribs) 13:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Very sorry. My bad. Mistook you for the vandalising IP you correctly reverted. All pompous and erroneous nonsense on my part humbly withdrawn. Keep up the good work. RashersTierney ( talk) 23:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor is questioning the lack of sources in the lead for Capitalism. If you would like to discuss this please reply on the talk page. The Four Deuces ( talk) 03:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi - you just changed my wiki entry. I fail to see how it lacks use. Being from the trafford constituency, I am offended you have removed information about a key event in its history. The birth marked 700th year of the altrincham charter - when it was granted status as a free borough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.137.55.174 ( talk) 20:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
You can't warn me over editing Gaga discography when I removed The Fame Monster. It has been discussed THOUSAND times on her album pages that The Fame Monster isn't a new album and therefore should not be included in her discography as a new one. I'm not removing the "warn" you did to me and you are the unconstructive person to that page. Another user has already reverted the shit you did! -- Zefron12 ( talk) 00:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just to let you know that you restored the wrong version here. I don't know how you managed it, but did you get an alert box saying that the edit was already being reverted? Or that you were undoing a revert by another editor? I think another person got there just before you, something to watch out for! Best Regards, Captain n00dle T/ C 21:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Please note that a user blanking a page they've created is not vandalism. Generally, that's interpreted as a request for G7 speedy deletion. Tag it as such and an admin will delete (of course, if the creator keeps reverting, talk to an admin in person). Thank you! Cheers, Master of Puppets 22:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Please read [6] and note the use of stolen and theft. This is the primary source that has clarified that this is a crime, not a "leak". ► RATEL ◄ 01:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I agree with you regarding the inclusion of the "ClimateGate" reference. I don't know what possible argument could be used to oppose. I saw the edit summary, but it looks like the editor made two changes and the edit summary refers to the "stole" issue.
On ref naming - I like the "reuter20091123" (or better yet "reuters20091123") convention for unambiguous use in URLs, but it is ugly and hard to read by humans, so I prefer a human readable for when humans need to read it. I won't touch the ones you have in that form, but I urge you to weigh in on the talk page, as we have been discussing the referencing, and no one else has objected.-- SPhilbrick T 15:06, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Kim D. Petersen ( talk) 15:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Nr | Edit(s) claimed to breaking Wikipedia:3RR | Comments |
---|---|---|
1 | [15] | As far as I can see I've added sources and quotations in these sources. Is this a revert? |
2 | [16] | None of the two references [17] [18] given says Stolen, so adjusting the text to reflect this should be quite obvious. |
3 | [19] | This is not an revert, I add a quotation in the reference for the disputed text ", likely an insider, [1]" with this "quote=Judging from the data posted, the hack was done either by an insider or by someone inside the climate community who was familiar with the debate, said Robert Graham, CEO with the consultancy Errata Security. Whenever this type of incident occurs, "80 percent of the time it's an insider," he said." |
4 | [20] | Restoring "statements that are sourced reliably, written in a neutral narrative, and pertain to the subject at hand." is just an action to restore a "disruptive" action, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar#Removal_of_sourced_edits_made_in_a_neutral_narrative_is_disruptive |
5 | [21] | Removing references without explanation? As far as I see it's an way of removing the importance of the term) |
6 | [22] | Its not an revert, its an moderation of a prior statement: ", likely an insider according to security experts," (bold what was added in this edit) |
7 | [23] | A revert, but it still falls under whats discussed at point 4 |
8 | [24] | A revert, but it still falls under whats discussed at point 4 |
I did not intend to remove the text. It looks like the person after me User:Chris O was editing there. I explained I did not touch that text at Talk:Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident. I have no opinion on it. Bevo74 ( talk) 17:04, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I think we might be able to do something. May I ask if you use any instant messengers? We can speak in detail over them. Macai ( talk) 18:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Fair use images cannot be used in talk pages or user pages. -- SPhilbrick T 01:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know, the protection expired a few hours ago for Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident so you don't need to use the editprotected template. One of your requested edits was made by a bot and I removed the template. The other one I removed the edit protected template without making the edit as I feel it may be wise to ensure there's no further controversy over the addition of the primary source. While I obviously won't edit war if you choose to make the propose change, I do feel it wise to wait perhaps one more day Nil Einne ( talk) 08:55, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
This user vandalized United States Congress. Many warnings. Why are they still allowed to edit?-- Tomwsulcer ( talk) 20:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I saw your comment on TS's page regarding this edit. You took offense and asked TS not to change the discussion. However, it is my understanding that TS's refactoring was not only acceptable but is encouraged, as it highlighted the fact that another discussion about Delingpole was in progress. You see, we have at least two prior threads concerning this topic, and it would be nice to know where they all are so we can view the entire discussion as a whole in the archives. Viriditas ( talk) 03:11, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
There's a lot worth challenging, but noindex of talk pages is quite standard.-- SPhilbrick T 04:52, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Have you seen this: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Climate_Change?
They are still working out the list of parties and whom to notify, so you may yet get formal notification, but just thought I'd make sure you knew.-- SPhilbrick T 18:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |