Nicole Sharp ( talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2022)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bohr–Sommerfeld model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elliptical. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Foot length and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 5#Foot length until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Antineutronium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_25#Antineutronium. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 04:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Please fix your edit at Category:Transit of Mercury. The problem is that there is a link to where a discussion about the deletion is supposed to occur, but the section for that discussion is missing. If it can't be fixed, the edit at the category needs to be reverted. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2021)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect USA Georgia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 29#USA Georgia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 18:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Nicole Sharp, we’re having a discussion on weather on the Boost Mobile whether one of its sections should be moved to another page and we would like for you input thanks BigRed606 ( talk) 19:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Pionic atom and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Pionic atom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 02:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
FYI, you may be interested in wikt:helionium, which I wrote based on your comment at RfD about the definition, and the talk page comment at talk:helionium. -- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 02:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2020)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lunar System. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 9#Lunar System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2019)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 06:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antitriton. Since you had some involvement with the Antitriton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
The article List of Sector General species has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:LISTN.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TTN (
talk) 17:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triproton. Since you had some involvement with the Triproton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Sector General alien species requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Heptation. Since you had some involvement with the Heptation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2018)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 09:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Northern Indic. Since you had some involvement with the Northern Indic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Uanfala (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zenphoto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenphoto (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
::
with *
instead of **
.
Nicole Sharp (
talk) 17:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZSYE. Since you had some involvement with the ZSYE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 12:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antilithium. Since you had some involvement with the Antilithium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:00, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Nicole Sharp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2017)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 16:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I closed your voting section because voting doesn't really solve anything. What you want to do instead is to initiate a move request (see WP:RM). -- regentspark ( comment) 23:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nicole Sharp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2016)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 16:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Taivo ( talk) 09:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charge number, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Politics of outer space shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 08:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
@ Doug Weller: if you disagree with the idea of merging " astropolitics" into " politics of outer space" or even whether the "politics of outer space" is a relevant topic for a Wikipedia article, please post to the talkpages at " talk:politics of outer space" or " talk:astropolitics." Either way, no discussion can take place unless you undo your recent revert at " politics of outer space." Deleting the article and redirecting the topic of "politics in outer space" to a British rock album doesn't make any sense. If anything, it should be redirecting to "astropolitics." However, a discussion on merging the two articles cannot take place unless both articles are available to view. As the articles are written now (before your deletion), "astropolitics" has a much narrower focus than the broader scope of the content at "politics of outer space," so it makes sense to merge the former into the latter (as well as since the latter title is less ambiguous and less controversial). I strongly advise simply undoing your recent revert at "politics of outer space" (for which the article had a merge notice already up) so that users can view both articles and comment on if and how they should be merged. Both are actually just stubs, and neither are full articles yet, so I do not see any merging being a major problem (and they are best to be merged now as stubs before they grow larger). Nicole Sharp ( talk) 09:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Nicole Sharp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2015)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 06:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Chris Troutman (
talk) 21:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human possession in science fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
user talk:AprilNicoleSharp
(2014)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2013)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole21532
(2012)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.
If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
user talk:Nicoletapedia
(2010)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 20:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
|
Nicole Sharp ( talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2022)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bohr–Sommerfeld model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elliptical. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Foot length and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 5#Foot length until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 06:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Antineutronium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_April_25#Antineutronium. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SmokeyJoe ( talk) 04:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Please fix your edit at Category:Transit of Mercury. The problem is that there is a link to where a discussion about the deletion is supposed to occur, but the section for that discussion is missing. If it can't be fixed, the edit at the category needs to be reverted. Johnuniq ( talk) 06:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2021)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 21:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect USA Georgia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 29#USA Georgia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 18:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Nicole Sharp, we’re having a discussion on weather on the Boost Mobile whether one of its sections should be moved to another page and we would like for you input thanks BigRed606 ( talk) 19:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Pionic atom and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 28#Pionic atom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (
talk) 02:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
FYI, you may be interested in wikt:helionium, which I wrote based on your comment at RfD about the definition, and the talk page comment at talk:helionium. -- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 02:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2020)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Lunar System. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 9#Lunar System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2019)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 06:46, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antitriton. Since you had some involvement with the Antitriton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
The article List of Sector General species has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:LISTN.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TTN (
talk) 17:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triproton. Since you had some involvement with the Triproton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:08, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Sector General alien species requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Heptation. Since you had some involvement with the Heptation redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 13:24, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2018)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 09:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Northern Indic. Since you had some involvement with the Northern Indic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Uanfala (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zenphoto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenphoto (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
::
with *
instead of **
.
Nicole Sharp (
talk) 17:01, 17 March 2018 (UTC)An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ZSYE. Since you had some involvement with the ZSYE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 ( talk) 12:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antilithium. Since you had some involvement with the Antilithium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 09:00, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Nicole Sharp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2017)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 16:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I closed your voting section because voting doesn't really solve anything. What you want to do instead is to initiate a move request (see WP:RM). -- regentspark ( comment) 23:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Nicole Sharp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2016)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 16:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Taivo ( talk) 09:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charge number, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Politics of outer space shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 08:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
@ Doug Weller: if you disagree with the idea of merging " astropolitics" into " politics of outer space" or even whether the "politics of outer space" is a relevant topic for a Wikipedia article, please post to the talkpages at " talk:politics of outer space" or " talk:astropolitics." Either way, no discussion can take place unless you undo your recent revert at " politics of outer space." Deleting the article and redirecting the topic of "politics in outer space" to a British rock album doesn't make any sense. If anything, it should be redirecting to "astropolitics." However, a discussion on merging the two articles cannot take place unless both articles are available to view. As the articles are written now (before your deletion), "astropolitics" has a much narrower focus than the broader scope of the content at "politics of outer space," so it makes sense to merge the former into the latter (as well as since the latter title is less ambiguous and less controversial). I strongly advise simply undoing your recent revert at "politics of outer space" (for which the article had a merge notice already up) so that users can view both articles and comment on if and how they should be merged. Both are actually just stubs, and neither are full articles yet, so I do not see any merging being a major problem (and they are best to be merged now as stubs before they grow larger). Nicole Sharp ( talk) 09:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Nicole Sharp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2015)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 06:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Chris Troutman (
talk) 21:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human possession in science fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
user talk:AprilNicoleSharp
(2014)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole Sharp
(2013)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
user talk:Nicole21532
(2012)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.
If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
user talk:Nicoletapedia
(2010)
InformationNicole Sharp ( talk) 20:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
|