This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have looked and can't seem to find much else. The following page [
[1]] goes into a little more detail but doesn't have any references itself. The IMDB movie locations page for the Colditz series does however mention that the castle was used for the exterior locations which was the main point in my edit.
D Dinneen. âPreceding
undated comment added 17:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC).
Hi Nev, I left this message at User:TFOWR's talk page then I saw he wasn't editing so I thought I'd run it past you, hope that's ok
You deleted an article with this title in July 2010. [2] I have no idea what state the article was in but I would like to recreate it in connection with some colliery articles I am writing. (It was a pit village) I had made a start in my sandbox when I realised it had been deleted, [ [3]]. I can provide refs and expand what I have started. What do you think?-- J3Mrs ( talk) 18:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
âThe WikiChevronsâ | ||
I hereby award you the WikiChevrons in recognition of your creative contributions to the military history task force reform efforts. Kirill [talk] [prof] 01:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC) |
Just to let you know that List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England has been nominated at FLC. Happy New Year. -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 09:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Well Done. FA! I got so bored yesterday I went to see Harry Potter pt 1 and one of the characters surnames is Peverell - I know JKRowling prob. got it from place names but if if hadnt been for William Peverell.... anyway. Cheers Victuallers ( talk) 16:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Well you were lucky that no one noticed the link and you'd missed out lots of other trivia :-) see here Victuallers ( talk) 18:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Not sure if this is pre-emptive or too late to worry about, but I thought I'd raise the question of protecting Alastair Cook's page again. It's not awash with edits, and he surely won't last much longer but I thought I'd remind you let you decide. Tony2Times ( talk) 04:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Both Dweller and I are aware that we're behind on updating the article, but now he's retiring from Test cricket, a concerted effort to (at least) update and close down that section of his article should be easy to do. Were you offering to help us, because that'd be great. The Rambling Man ( talk) 23:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Nev1. I saw you recently corrected an unjustified removal of images in Ä°zmir page. It's that intervention of yours which prompts me to write to you to ask you if blocking that page to non-confirmed users would be a good idea. It's being edited by anonymous users since almost two months, often senselesssly like removing a link to Exchange of populations between Greece and Turkey and adding a nobody's name (Resul who?) as mayor. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=%C4%B0zmir&action=history. Regards. Cretanforever ( talk) 21:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
On 6 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Steve Hanley (rugby union), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Steve Hanley, who played for rugby union side Sale Sharks from 1998 to 2007, scored 75 tries in the English Premiership which remains a record? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
â Grondemar 23:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev1/Archives/JanuaryâFebruary 2011. A Worcestershire Project page has now been taken on by a reviewer for Good Article after a very long wait. Several points need addressing, but the page has not been rejected as an immediate fail. If you have time, please see Talk:Evesham, and if you can address any of the points listed, I'm sure that between us we can get it through to GA. Thanks. -- Kudpung ( talk) 21:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Looks like Key bus routes in Derbyshire needs protection as well. Can we think of any other wording variations? Alzarian16 ( talk) 18:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about this... it's William Longchamp on the main page which is spilling over to Dickie-boy. (tears hair out). I dropped a note on Wehwalt's page as I really don't want to have to file at the 3rr page... Ealdgyth - Talk 14:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Here is a link: Link 72.5.199.254 ( talk) 00:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Without any legal reason you have removed the images (of the particular saint), as well as link to Commons, from the article about Saint Josse (previously listed as Saint Judoc - the Oxford dictionary of Saints lists him namely as Judoc and not Josse). This is an act of vandalism to remove images from the article. Please restore the images to the article along with the link to the saint´s folder at Wikimedia Common´s (where he is sorted under his Breton name Saint Judoc). -- Roman Zacharij ( talk) 00:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't post links to someone calling me a cunt on my talk page. I can't believe I even have to write this, as very little common sense could have gone into seeing that your edit to my talk page was 100% inappropriate in every way.-- Kleopatra ( talk) 23:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Just a quick note to say thanks for all your and Malleus' encouragement over the Windsor Castle article; I don't suspect that I'd have taken the step of putting it up for FA status without it, and the review process has definitely improved the article's quality. Very much appreciated - cheers! Hchc2009 ( talk) 20:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev. I think that was a good call about the raven pic at the Tower of London - it's a perfectly nice photo of the birdies but, as you say, has nothing in it to place it in context at the Tower, so it doesn't really need to be there. I must respectfully disagree slightly with the next thing you say - they are perhaps a little minor (a little minor - did I really write that?) compared to the actual stone and, er, stone of the building, but I do think they make an interesting and colourful (or indeed black) part of the story. If a suitable photo could be found or created that was not only a decent picture of the said corvids, but placed it nicely in context at the Tower, would that not be a good addition to the article? I am not saying I know of such an image, merely that if it existed then I think I'd be part of a consensus to welcome it if it were found or made. Thanks and best wishes DBaK ( talk) 17:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your fine work there. Is it ok if I copy the conversation over to article talk as I think it offers an excellent solution to the problem? -- John ( talk) 04:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I saw this ( Template:Inflation) and thought of you - as you've used historic costs in some of your articles. Had you seen it before? Would it be useful? Daicaregos ( talk) 10:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Although i am aware of Greater Manchester,i know it is not a County.i know that as i am from and live in Bolton that it is in Lancashire,and i am not being told where i live by someone who is probably not even from here.i have made quite a few edits to Bolton and everytime i do they get taken off.please stop it it is not correct and not helpful.people need to know that towns such as Bolton and Bury are still in Lancashire so please stop this unuseful editing.as the local government act said the old Boundaries would not be altered and they havent.they are still in Lancashire. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 19:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
i will continue making my edits and if they carry on being taken off i wil get blocked,i dont care.but just listen,all useful and correct sites not written by idiots know that Bolton and Bury are in Lancashire,this just goes to show what a useless,stupid unuseful site Wikipedia is.Bolton and Bury are in Lancashire.always have been always will be. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 20:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
it is clear you dont know what your talking about when it comes to counties. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 20:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
why do you keep saying the same thing. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 20:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev. By my own admission, I've not looked at Shakib al-Hasans page since August, but you've done a good job sorting that out. Sachin being Sachin will constantly get fan edits, so good luck keeping that one in order!!!! On a note of tidy ups (something I'm not great at!!!!), Shane Warnes article is looking rather sad. Wonder if a FA drive could be put together? AssociateAffiliate ( talk) 20:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, if you are going to 'clarify' things, then please ensure that you do actually clarify things.
I fail to see how the Beetham Tower, built in 2007, which is shorter than the Malmĥ Turning Torso, completed in 2005, could ever have been the tallest residential building in Europe. You do realise Sweden is in Europe?
109.225.92.73 ( talk) 22:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks that's awesome dude. Aaroncrick TALK 06:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've recently been working on List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset and have been looking (enviously) at Danebury and Maiden Castle, Dorset for inspiration! Any help, advice edits or sources you could offer would be great. In particular today I've done an initial article for Stokeleigh Camp (the Bain and Haldane reference are the most comprehensive) and I wondered if you could take a look?â Rod talk 17:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
There has been a issue in WT:CRIC that needs your vote. Thanks -- ashwinikalantri talk 06:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev, While I am trying to AGF, the edits to Wallsuches, Horwich and Metropolitan Borough of Bolton are almost the same as by last night's IP and who is remarkably similar to one you blocked a couple of weeks ago. -- J3Mrs ( talk) 19:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
what county are Bolton and Bury in âPreceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.155.219 ( talk) 19:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Will you please look over my recent edits to George Cholmondeley, 5th Marquess of Cholmondeley? I am a bit uncertain about infobox image caption which identifies the marquess as Earl Rocksavage. I wasn't sure what to do; and those to whom I used to turn have retired from our project.
I suppose we could say that my questions are arguably addressed to you because Cholmondeley Castle is in Malpas? Can we construe this as part of WikiProject Cheshire?-- Tenmei ( talk) 05:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Earl of Rocksavage is the title used by the eldest son of the Marquis of Cholmondeley. The image available for the 5th marquis is from a time before he had inherited the title. In other words, his father died in 1923 and the photo is from 1913. In the infobox, should the caption have been earl or marquis. Since the article is about the marquis, my guess is that the infobox should mirror the article title. But I was unsure. The correct usage of British titles can be a bit tricky. For example, the painting in the upper right corner of the article about the wife of the marquis is somewhat well known. It identifies the Marchioness of Cholmondeley by the name she was known when John Singer Sargent painted her portrait -- see File:Sibyl Sasson, Countess of Rocksavage.jpg. You see my point?
According to my research, the 7th Marquis inherited both Houghton Hall and Cholmondeley Castle -- hence the connection to Cheshire ... but I am also reaching out to Nev1 for other reasons.
This was a convenient opportunity to work together on a very small question. It was also an opportunity to re-establish a very tenuous connection. -- Tenmei ( talk) 10:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I think I've worked out where the problem is... look at his userpage, particularly the age box. AD 13:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The cluebot archive of Talk:Hanged, drawn and quartered seems to be all messed up. I copied the contents of all archive pages back to talk, would you be able to delete all those archive pages so that cluebot can begin again? Parrot of Doom 21:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Hanged, drawn and quartered#Archive there is a problem that needs sorting out. The first archive was created by moving, so either we need to merge the histories or we need to restore the archive. I am not sure about archive 2. But I think we need to discuss this on the talk page of the article so that we can agree on what to do. -- PBS ( talk) 20:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello Nev,
im writing you this message to ask you if you could unblock my IP address. I found out that my brother was unconstructivly editing under the user name ShaunMcD and as i believe you have blocked his account and quite rightly so, you have also blocked my IP address so i can not edit within my household, i have to travel away to edit, so please could you unblock the IP or the user and i ensure that the account ShaunMcD will never be opened again and that my brother never touches Wikipedia again, if you could unblock i would be greatfull, thank you very much, Liam Taylor 15:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 16:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Why is moving Wife selling controversial? The issue was discussed on the talk page and it was agreed that if another article on wife selling in China were created, the older article should be moved to something more specific. This is just basic Wikipedia article naming policy. Kaldari ( talk) 21:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev, I think the best place to look would be Carol Sweetenham's introduction to her edition of Robert's chronicle. I don't have it with me and I can't see much of it on Google Books, but she summarizes all the possibilities, and I believe she concludes that he was writing around 1106-1107. Adam Bishop ( talk) 22:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have looked and can't seem to find much else. The following page [
[1]] goes into a little more detail but doesn't have any references itself. The IMDB movie locations page for the Colditz series does however mention that the castle was used for the exterior locations which was the main point in my edit.
D Dinneen. âPreceding
undated comment added 17:17, 30 December 2010 (UTC).
Hi Nev, I left this message at User:TFOWR's talk page then I saw he wasn't editing so I thought I'd run it past you, hope that's ok
You deleted an article with this title in July 2010. [2] I have no idea what state the article was in but I would like to recreate it in connection with some colliery articles I am writing. (It was a pit village) I had made a start in my sandbox when I realised it had been deleted, [ [3]]. I can provide refs and expand what I have started. What do you think?-- J3Mrs ( talk) 18:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
âThe WikiChevronsâ | ||
I hereby award you the WikiChevrons in recognition of your creative contributions to the military history task force reform efforts. Kirill [talk] [prof] 01:37, 4 January 2011 (UTC) |
Just to let you know that List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England has been nominated at FLC. Happy New Year. -- Peter I. Vardy ( talk) 09:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Well Done. FA! I got so bored yesterday I went to see Harry Potter pt 1 and one of the characters surnames is Peverell - I know JKRowling prob. got it from place names but if if hadnt been for William Peverell.... anyway. Cheers Victuallers ( talk) 16:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Well you were lucky that no one noticed the link and you'd missed out lots of other trivia :-) see here Victuallers ( talk) 18:17, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Not sure if this is pre-emptive or too late to worry about, but I thought I'd raise the question of protecting Alastair Cook's page again. It's not awash with edits, and he surely won't last much longer but I thought I'd remind you let you decide. Tony2Times ( talk) 04:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Both Dweller and I are aware that we're behind on updating the article, but now he's retiring from Test cricket, a concerted effort to (at least) update and close down that section of his article should be easy to do. Were you offering to help us, because that'd be great. The Rambling Man ( talk) 23:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Nev1. I saw you recently corrected an unjustified removal of images in Ä°zmir page. It's that intervention of yours which prompts me to write to you to ask you if blocking that page to non-confirmed users would be a good idea. It's being edited by anonymous users since almost two months, often senselesssly like removing a link to Exchange of populations between Greece and Turkey and adding a nobody's name (Resul who?) as mayor. http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=%C4%B0zmir&action=history. Regards. Cretanforever ( talk) 21:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
On 6 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Steve Hanley (rugby union), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Steve Hanley, who played for rugby union side Sale Sharks from 1998 to 2007, scored 75 tries in the English Premiership which remains a record? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
â Grondemar 23:12, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev1/Archives/JanuaryâFebruary 2011. A Worcestershire Project page has now been taken on by a reviewer for Good Article after a very long wait. Several points need addressing, but the page has not been rejected as an immediate fail. If you have time, please see Talk:Evesham, and if you can address any of the points listed, I'm sure that between us we can get it through to GA. Thanks. -- Kudpung ( talk) 21:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Looks like Key bus routes in Derbyshire needs protection as well. Can we think of any other wording variations? Alzarian16 ( talk) 18:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about this... it's William Longchamp on the main page which is spilling over to Dickie-boy. (tears hair out). I dropped a note on Wehwalt's page as I really don't want to have to file at the 3rr page... Ealdgyth - Talk 14:15, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Here is a link: Link 72.5.199.254 ( talk) 00:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Without any legal reason you have removed the images (of the particular saint), as well as link to Commons, from the article about Saint Josse (previously listed as Saint Judoc - the Oxford dictionary of Saints lists him namely as Judoc and not Josse). This is an act of vandalism to remove images from the article. Please restore the images to the article along with the link to the saint´s folder at Wikimedia Common´s (where he is sorted under his Breton name Saint Judoc). -- Roman Zacharij ( talk) 00:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't post links to someone calling me a cunt on my talk page. I can't believe I even have to write this, as very little common sense could have gone into seeing that your edit to my talk page was 100% inappropriate in every way.-- Kleopatra ( talk) 23:10, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Just a quick note to say thanks for all your and Malleus' encouragement over the Windsor Castle article; I don't suspect that I'd have taken the step of putting it up for FA status without it, and the review process has definitely improved the article's quality. Very much appreciated - cheers! Hchc2009 ( talk) 20:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev. I think that was a good call about the raven pic at the Tower of London - it's a perfectly nice photo of the birdies but, as you say, has nothing in it to place it in context at the Tower, so it doesn't really need to be there. I must respectfully disagree slightly with the next thing you say - they are perhaps a little minor (a little minor - did I really write that?) compared to the actual stone and, er, stone of the building, but I do think they make an interesting and colourful (or indeed black) part of the story. If a suitable photo could be found or created that was not only a decent picture of the said corvids, but placed it nicely in context at the Tower, would that not be a good addition to the article? I am not saying I know of such an image, merely that if it existed then I think I'd be part of a consensus to welcome it if it were found or made. Thanks and best wishes DBaK ( talk) 17:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Thanks for your fine work there. Is it ok if I copy the conversation over to article talk as I think it offers an excellent solution to the problem? -- John ( talk) 04:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I saw this ( Template:Inflation) and thought of you - as you've used historic costs in some of your articles. Had you seen it before? Would it be useful? Daicaregos ( talk) 10:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Although i am aware of Greater Manchester,i know it is not a County.i know that as i am from and live in Bolton that it is in Lancashire,and i am not being told where i live by someone who is probably not even from here.i have made quite a few edits to Bolton and everytime i do they get taken off.please stop it it is not correct and not helpful.people need to know that towns such as Bolton and Bury are still in Lancashire so please stop this unuseful editing.as the local government act said the old Boundaries would not be altered and they havent.they are still in Lancashire. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 19:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
i will continue making my edits and if they carry on being taken off i wil get blocked,i dont care.but just listen,all useful and correct sites not written by idiots know that Bolton and Bury are in Lancashire,this just goes to show what a useless,stupid unuseful site Wikipedia is.Bolton and Bury are in Lancashire.always have been always will be. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 20:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
it is clear you dont know what your talking about when it comes to counties. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 20:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
why do you keep saying the same thing. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.193.141 ( talk) 20:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev. By my own admission, I've not looked at Shakib al-Hasans page since August, but you've done a good job sorting that out. Sachin being Sachin will constantly get fan edits, so good luck keeping that one in order!!!! On a note of tidy ups (something I'm not great at!!!!), Shane Warnes article is looking rather sad. Wonder if a FA drive could be put together? AssociateAffiliate ( talk) 20:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, if you are going to 'clarify' things, then please ensure that you do actually clarify things.
I fail to see how the Beetham Tower, built in 2007, which is shorter than the Malmĥ Turning Torso, completed in 2005, could ever have been the tallest residential building in Europe. You do realise Sweden is in Europe?
109.225.92.73 ( talk) 22:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks that's awesome dude. Aaroncrick TALK 06:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've recently been working on List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset and have been looking (enviously) at Danebury and Maiden Castle, Dorset for inspiration! Any help, advice edits or sources you could offer would be great. In particular today I've done an initial article for Stokeleigh Camp (the Bain and Haldane reference are the most comprehensive) and I wondered if you could take a look?â Rod talk 17:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
There has been a issue in WT:CRIC that needs your vote. Thanks -- ashwinikalantri talk 06:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev, While I am trying to AGF, the edits to Wallsuches, Horwich and Metropolitan Borough of Bolton are almost the same as by last night's IP and who is remarkably similar to one you blocked a couple of weeks ago. -- J3Mrs ( talk) 19:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
what county are Bolton and Bury in âPreceding unsigned comment added by 90.203.155.219 ( talk) 19:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Will you please look over my recent edits to George Cholmondeley, 5th Marquess of Cholmondeley? I am a bit uncertain about infobox image caption which identifies the marquess as Earl Rocksavage. I wasn't sure what to do; and those to whom I used to turn have retired from our project.
I suppose we could say that my questions are arguably addressed to you because Cholmondeley Castle is in Malpas? Can we construe this as part of WikiProject Cheshire?-- Tenmei ( talk) 05:31, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Earl of Rocksavage is the title used by the eldest son of the Marquis of Cholmondeley. The image available for the 5th marquis is from a time before he had inherited the title. In other words, his father died in 1923 and the photo is from 1913. In the infobox, should the caption have been earl or marquis. Since the article is about the marquis, my guess is that the infobox should mirror the article title. But I was unsure. The correct usage of British titles can be a bit tricky. For example, the painting in the upper right corner of the article about the wife of the marquis is somewhat well known. It identifies the Marchioness of Cholmondeley by the name she was known when John Singer Sargent painted her portrait -- see File:Sibyl Sasson, Countess of Rocksavage.jpg. You see my point?
According to my research, the 7th Marquis inherited both Houghton Hall and Cholmondeley Castle -- hence the connection to Cheshire ... but I am also reaching out to Nev1 for other reasons.
This was a convenient opportunity to work together on a very small question. It was also an opportunity to re-establish a very tenuous connection. -- Tenmei ( talk) 10:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I think I've worked out where the problem is... look at his userpage, particularly the age box. AD 13:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The cluebot archive of Talk:Hanged, drawn and quartered seems to be all messed up. I copied the contents of all archive pages back to talk, would you be able to delete all those archive pages so that cluebot can begin again? Parrot of Doom 21:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Hanged, drawn and quartered#Archive there is a problem that needs sorting out. The first archive was created by moving, so either we need to merge the histories or we need to restore the archive. I am not sure about archive 2. But I think we need to discuss this on the talk page of the article so that we can agree on what to do. -- PBS ( talk) 20:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello Nev,
im writing you this message to ask you if you could unblock my IP address. I found out that my brother was unconstructivly editing under the user name ShaunMcD and as i believe you have blocked his account and quite rightly so, you have also blocked my IP address so i can not edit within my household, i have to travel away to edit, so please could you unblock the IP or the user and i ensure that the account ShaunMcD will never be opened again and that my brother never touches Wikipedia again, if you could unblock i would be greatfull, thank you very much, Liam Taylor 15:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 16:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Why is moving Wife selling controversial? The issue was discussed on the talk page and it was agreed that if another article on wife selling in China were created, the older article should be moved to something more specific. This is just basic Wikipedia article naming policy. Kaldari ( talk) 21:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Nev, I think the best place to look would be Carol Sweetenham's introduction to her edition of Robert's chronicle. I don't have it with me and I can't see much of it on Google Books, but she summarizes all the possibilities, and I believe she concludes that he was writing around 1106-1107. Adam Bishop ( talk) 22:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)