Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prairie Radio Communications and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Prairie Radio Communications, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 04:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aborted (The Clash album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aborted (The Clash album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ^{Talk to me} 15:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1,

Thanks for creating Last Day on Earth (Duran Duran song)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn ( talk) 09:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1,

Thanks for creating Playing with Uranium! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn ( talk) 09:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Last Day on Earth (Duran Duran song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 08:04, 12 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Divinyls, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 05:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gillette, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 29 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Last Day on Earth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 ( talk) 07:48, 14 August 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toto (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:23, 30 October 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Van Halen IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Halen IV (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 ( talk) 04:44, 16 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Muse (band), you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 05:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercy Hospital ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ordinary Man (Ozzy Osbourne song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Billy Walsh and Andrew Watt ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:32, 1 February 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electropop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daughtry ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 13:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vatalanib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roadhouse ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wishing Well (Terence Trent D'Arby song). Rob van vee 06:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KQCJ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KJOC ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Folk-pop, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rosalina2427 ^{(talk to me)} 04:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The End of the Innocence ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Funk 49, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Analog Man ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talking blues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talking ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:39, 17 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Heart of America Group Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Heart of America Group Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{ PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{ self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ^{( Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Heart of America Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Progressive metal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Art metal.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Shock punk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Judging from Gbooks and Google Scholar, "shock punk" is not really a thing. This dab is WP:XY as neither of the articles says anything about "shock punk".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ( t · c) buidhe 00:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at With Teeth. One more unsourced edit and we're going to WP:ANI with this! Rob van vee 05:45, 12 October 2020 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Psychedelic country, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:McCartneyIII.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. funplussmart ( talk) 19:19, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:McCartneyIII.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2020 Atlantic hurricane season, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( talk). 02:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Sorry. I only added Invest 96-L (It's correct name for right now) as it has a high chance of development (80%). Now that I think about it, Invests more than likely fall under either WP:TOOSOON or WP:CRYSTAL BALL. This should become a depression/storm soon at which point it can be added back in under its new name (like ETA). Also, what is F13? You mentioned it in the edit summary on the page, but I could not find any info on it within the Wikipedia policies you linked to (unless I missed it). Moline1 ( talk) 03:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

It is all good. I understand, your edit was reverted as we usually don't mention invests until they begin to have advisories come out, at which case they are classified as a tropical cyclone. That is why I left this on your talk page. I was not the person who reverted your edit, but the person who did revert your edit was referring to an organization known as "Force thirteen, which is a group of of people on Youtube who make videos about tropical cyclones, but they are not accurate when it comes to the system strengths, and they commonly go against the NHC for tropical cyclone classifications. I think they inferred that you got your info from them based on the way your edit looked. My apologies, I just wanted to leave this message on your talk page just in case you didn't know why your edit was reverted, or how to edit a tropical cyclone page. I hope this helps in some way, thanks for the response. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( talk). 03:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Ah, ok. Thanks for your reply. The info that I used for the Invest 96-L section came from Weather Channel, and not YouTube Videos. I am a bit surprised YouTubers do that. I'm surprised the NHC hasn't tried to stop them. Still no development yet, but probably later today or tomorrow, it will have. Moline1 ( talk) 13:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Oh okay, yeah that is fine, as I said before we don't label the system until it is officially labeled as a tropical cyclone, so when they begin to release advisories and updates. I was surprised too, until I looked them up, and found that there is actually a decent number of people who believe what F13 says, even though some of the things they say are false. For example, they did a recap of the 2019 Hurricane season, and they thought that Hurricane Lorenzo was only a category 4, that Jerry was only a Cat 1, and that Nestor was a Subtropical storm. Apparently sometimes people try to edit Wikipedia because they think F13 is correct, though it isn't at all. I honestly don't think that the NHC cares, because it is a relatively small channel voicing their opinions, and honestly I think that most people trust the NHC way more that some small Youtube channel anyway. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( talk). 15:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Exactly! The info Weather Channel gets is straight from the NHC and the Models (GFS, EURO, etc). Definitely not like the YouTube junk out there. Still nothing as of yet per Weather Channel Radar. Moline1 ( talk) 19:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Yes indeed. It appears that the NHC has begun to label the system. Also, I left an invite to our wiki-project if you're interested in joining.🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( talk). 21:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

TD 29 has finally formed. Looks like someone beat us to the punch. Moline1 ( talk) 21:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

I may join. This hurricane season has had me intrigued as I do not remember 2005's at all. Moline1 ( talk) 21:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Yeah, looks like it. Yes it is very intriguing, I agree, for me at least it was very memorable. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( talk). 21:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC) Well, Here we are two days later with a strong hurricane threatening Central America. it is amazing how quickly these systems have intensified lately. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 17:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

It is! What happens when this moves over water again is up for grabs. Weather Channel said it could either remain the same, or weaken, loose everything, and attain a new identity (rather than be rechristened under ETA). Moline1 ( talk) 22:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Yeah, from what I have been hearing, the system could do anything, as it is still too early to tell, but I have been hearing that once it makes landfall it may become a CAG which will lead to more rainfall and spawn another system. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 01:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC) reply

We will have to wait and see. I'm kind of curious to see how far we get into the Greek Alphabet before the season ends (provided the storms don't landfall), although we cannot discount December (see 2005), and that has 31 days of potential tropical activity. Only time will tell. Moline1 ( talk) 02:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I agree. I am too, I am hoping it ends sooner rather than later, it sure has been tiring lol. I agree though, we can't discount any month of the year provided conditions are favorable for development. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 03:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Also, if you join the WPTC, here is a welcome in advanced! 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 01:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Well, we have Invest 97-L as well as another area that is not yet an invest in addition to Eta. Next storm is Iotta (or whatever name it is). 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 Moline1 ( talk) 14:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Yeah, I saw it this morning, it'll be interesting to see what comes of the system. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 16:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Yes it will! Invest 97-L has 80% chance while the one closer to ETA has 50% right now. Moline1 ( talk) 00:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC) definitely. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 00:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Subtropical Storm Theta just formed. Heard it on my local weather cast. 2020 is now more active than 2005 (2005 technically had an ETA, but it went unnoticed till 2006, and so wasn't named) Moline1 ( talk) 03:55, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Very crazy. Who would have thought that this season would turn out like this...🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 04:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC) Right? We still have that other area to watch with a 50% chance of development. This will be Iota if it does anything. We also have 31 days of December as well. If that happens, not only will we have much more storms than 2005, we would also have more off-season storms than 2005 (2005 had December storms, while 2020 currently has only May). Only time will tell. Moline1 ( talk) 04:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC) definitely.. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 04:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Just in case you want to join, you know a good amount about tropical cyclones, so just in case you want to, here is our wiki-project invitation.

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 18:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC) reply

I think I will. Thanks! Moline1 ( talk) 19:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC) reply

yeah, no problem :) 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( chat with me!). 20:00, 10 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

• You can check out topics on the main page.
• You can re-assess tropical cyclone-related articles to assure they are up to standards.
• See the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.
• Check out the guidelines to get an idea of the project's standards.
• If you want to work on an article, Category:Stub-Class Tropical cyclone articles is a great place to start.
• You can also check out the newsletter.
• For further information, you could join the WikiProject Tropical cyclones IRC channel or Discord server.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

• You can check out topics on the main page.
• You can re-assess tropical cyclone-related articles to assure they are up to standards.
• See the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.
• Check out the guidelines to get an idea of the project's standards.
• If you want to work on an article, Category:Stub-Class Tropical cyclone articles is a great place to start.
• You can also check out the newsletter.
• For further information, you could join the WikiProject Tropical cyclones IRC channel or Discord server.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

So you're new to this project too! Welcome! 🌀 Hurricane Janor ( talk) 17:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Moline1 ( talk) 23:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello. I would like to point out that HurricaneJanor above is a sockpuppet of Destroyeraa, and as Destroyeraa is an experienced editor, that would mean that HurricaneJanor here is not actually new to the project. 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( Chat| Edits| sandbox) 19:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

🌀 Weatherman27🏈 ( Chat| Edits| sandbox) has given you a Turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving! Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{subst:Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Volume XLIV, Issue 44, December 1, 2020 ←(Previous issues) 41 · 42 · 43 · 44 · 45 → The Hurricane Herald: Happy Thanksgiving Edition! The Hurricane Herald is the semi-regular newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The newsletter aims to provide in summary the recent activities and developments of the WikiProject, in addition to global tropical cyclone activity. The Hurricane Herald has been running since its first edition ran on June 4, 2006. If you wish to receive or discontinue subscription to this newsletter, please visit the mailing list. This issue of The Hurricane Herald covers all project related events from October 5–November 30, 2020. This edition's editors and authors are SMB99thx, Weatherman27, Chicdat, Hurricanehink, Cyclone Toby, Typhoon2013, and ChessEric. Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve the newsletter and other cyclone-related articles. Past editions can be viewed here.

WikiProject Tropical Cyclones: News & Developments New articles since the last newsletter include: 1900s North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons 1910s North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons 1920s North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons 1925 Pacific hurricane season 1926 Pacific hurricane season 1927 Pacific hurricane season 1928 Pacific hurricane season 1929 Pacific hurricane season 1930 Pacific hurricane season 1930s North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons 1931 Pacific hurricane season 1932 Pacific hurricane season 1933 Pacific hurricane season 1934 Pacific hurricane season 1935 Pacific hurricane season 1936 Pacific hurricane season 1936 Mid-Atlantic hurricane 1937 Pacific hurricane season 1938 Pacific hurricane season 1940 Pacific hurricane season 1941 Pacific hurricane season 1971 Odisha cyclone (reintroduced, this article survived the merge on the assessment table for years.) Cyclone Ava Cyclone Aivu Cyclone Titli Effects of the 1919 Florida Keys hurricane in Texas Effects of Hurricane Dorian in the Carolinas Hurricane Chris (2018) Hurricanes in Nicaragua List of named storms (B) List of named storms (J) List of named storms (K) List of named storms (S) List of named storms (Q) List of named storms (U) List of named storms (V) List of named storms (W) List of named storms (X) List of named storms (Y) List of South-West Indian Ocean tropical cyclones List of super typhoons List of very strong typhoons List of violent typhoons List of Western Pacific severe tropical storms November 1964 Vietnam floods Tropical cyclones in 2003 Tropical cyclones in 2008 Tropical Storm Brendan (1991) Tropical Storm Nakri (2014) Tropical Storm Usagi (2018) Typhoon Alice (1953) Typhoon Amy (1962) Typhoon Dot (1964) Typhoon Georgia (1959) Typhoon Ida (1945) Typhoon Joan (1959) Typhoon Khanun (2005) Typhoon Lingling (2019) Typhoon Marge (1973) Typhoon Opal (1962) Typhoon Sally (1964) Typhoon Soulik (2018) Typhoon Violet (1961) Typhoon Winnie (1964) New GA's include: Hurricane Barry (2019) Tropical Storm Arthur (2020) Tropical Storm Bertha (2020) Tropical Storm Ewiniar (2018) Typhoon Jebi (2018) Featured Content From October 5 to November 30, two featured articles were promoted: Hurricane Hector (2018) Hurricane Walaka From the Main Page documents WikiProject related materials that have appeared on the main page from October 5–November 30, 2020 in chronological order. Today's Featured Article/ List October 12 - Hurricane Gonzalo November 1 - Typhoon Gay (1989) November 28 - Hurricane Lane (2018) There is currently one featured article candidate: Meteorological history of Hurricane Michael WikiProject To-Do Here are some tasks you can do: Requests: List of named storms from C to H and M to P, List of Eastern Pacific tropical depressions and other intensity lists, Pacific typhoon seasons from 1902 to 1938, Australian region cyclone seasons from 1963 to 1970, South Pacific cyclone seasons from 1958 to 1969, Tropical cyclones in 2002, 1870 Straits of Florida hurricane, 1864 Calcutta cyclone, Hurricanes in Mexico, Tropical cyclone effects by region, more... Citation needed: Make sure articles like for example Pacific hurricane, Tropical cyclones in 2013 and Tropical cyclones in 2007 are cited properly. Cleanup: Tropical cyclones in India, Tropical cyclones in Myanmar, Tropical cyclones in Sri Lanka, List of Texas hurricanes (pre-1900), Typhoon Faxai and other storms in 2019 Pacific typhoon season (and the season article itself), 2020 Pacific typhoon season Expand: Indianola Hurricane of 1886, 1936 Mid-Atlantic hurricane, Seasonal summaries and global condition sections for nearly every tropical cyclones by year articles, Pacific hurricane season timelines and earlier season articles in 1950s, 1941/ 1942/ 1943/ 1944 Pacific typhoon seasons, List of named storms (J)/ (K)/ (T), Tropical Storm Fay (2008), Typhoon Winnie (1964) Stubs: Typhoon Trix (1952), 1876 Bengal cyclone, 1971 Odisha cyclone, 1978 Sri Lanka cyclone, Typhoon Kathleen (1947), 1900s/ 1910s/ 1920s/ 1930s North Indian Ocean cyclone seasons, 1900s/ 1920s/ 1930s Australian region cyclone seasons, more... 20th Anniversary push: some goals for the 20th year of Wikipedia (January 15, 2021!) include the creation or improvement of many other articles listed in the first section on the WPTC talk page. Current assessment table Assessments valid as of this printing. Depending on when you may be viewing this newsletter, the table may be outdated. See here for the latest, most up to date statistics. As of this issue, there are 164 featured articles and 70 featured lists. There are 133 A-class articles, and 1,010 good articles. There are only 71 B-class articles, perhaps because because most articles of that quality already passed a GA review. There are 415 C-class articles, 788 start-class articles, and 182 stub-class articles, with 23 lists, and 9 current articles. These figures mean that slightly more than half of the project is rated a GA or better. Typhoon Warren was the 1000th GA in the project. About the assessment scale → Project Goals & Progress The following is the current progress on the three milestone goals set by the WikiProject as of this publishing. They can be found, updated, at the main WikiProject page. 250 featured pages: 91.2% complete 200 featured articles: 79.5% complete 1500 good articles: 73.1% complete Storms of the month over the last year Month Storm November 2020 Hurricane Iota October 2020 Typhoon Goni (2020) September 2020 Cyclone Ianos August 2020 Hurricane Laura July 2020 Hurricane Isaias June 2020 Tropical Storm Cristobal (2020) May 2020 Cyclone Amphan April 2020 Cyclone Harold March 2020 Cyclone Herold February 2020 Cyclone Damien January 2020 Cyclone Tino December 2019 Cyclone Ambali November 2019 Cyclone Bulbul October 2019 Typhoon Hagibis Storms of the month and other tropical activity for October and November SotM for October: Typhoon Goni / Rolly Typhoon Goni formed from east of The Philippines towards the end of October, just as Typhoon Molave ravaged the country. Taking in the plentiful favorable conditions, Goni, known as Rolly in The Philippines, explosively intensified into a Category-5 equivalent hurricane just three days after it became a tropical depression. An eyewall replacement cycle managed to curb its intensification. Goni finished the cycle a few hours before it made landfall, and explosively intensified again into winds of 195 mph (JTWC) and a pressure of 884 mbar. This allowed it to tie with typhoons Haiyan and Meranti as the strongest typhoon by wind speed. Goni made landfall at peak intensity, killing 25 people and causing US$368 million in damage. SotM for November: Hurricane Iota Hurricane Iota developed in the central Caribbean Sea in mid-November. Like Goni, it explosively intensified, strengthening 120 mph in 48 hours, and deepening 81 mbar in the same amount of time. Iota explosively strengthened late on November 15 and early on November 16, becoming a Category 5 hurricane at 15:00 UTC on the 16th. By the time Iota had achieved C5 intensity, three people were already dead in Colombia due to landslides. As the storm made landfall, and subsequently weakened and dissipated, adding to the destruction from Hurricane Eta. Iota killed at least 61 people. Atlantic - Gamma, Delta, Epsilon, Zeta, Eta, Theta, Iota. The active Atlantic hurricane season continued. In early October, Tropical Storm Gamma dissipated over the northern Yucatan and was absorbed by powerful Hurricane Delta, which was the season's third major hurricane. Delta weakened before hitting Quintana Roo, but restrengthened in the Gulf of Mexico, later hitting Louisiana as a low-end Category 2 hurricane in nearly the same location as Hurricane Laura in August. Delta killed six people and left US$4 billion in damage. A few days later, Hurricane Epsilon developed southeast of Bermuda, becoming a major hurricane and brushing the island to the east. Hurricane Zeta followed a similar path as Delta, striking Quintana Roo and later striking southeastern Louisiana as a Category 2 hurricane; it killed 8 people and left U$3 billion in damage. At the end of the month, Hurricane Eta developed, becoming a strong Category 4 hurricane before striking Nicaragua. After killing hundreds of people in Central America, Eta reformed in the northwestern Caribbean. It made another landfall in Cuba, moved over the Florida Keys, and briefly became a hurricane again in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, before weakening and striking Cedar Key, Florida as a tropical storm. In early November, Tropical Storm Theta developed from a non-tropical low and moved across the eastern Atlantic. Eastern Pacific - Tropical Storm Norbert was the basin's only storm in October. It formed southwest of Mexico, though wind shear killed it off within a few days. Norbert then pulled a surprise on meteorologists: it regenerated into a tropical storm again on October 13, although it eventually dying again two days later. In early November, the season's next system, Tropical storm Odalys, formed, which remained weak off southwest Mexico. After an 11-day lull in activity, Tropical Storm Polo southwest of Mexico, which dissipated two days after its formation. Western Pacific - In early October, Typhoon Chan-Hom passed south of Japan and turned to the southeast, dissipating after 12 days. A series of storms affected Vietnam, causing deadly floods that killed over 200 people. In short succession, tropical storms Linfa and Nangka struck the country. Typhoon Saudel moved across the Philippines and later struck Vietnam. Typhoon Molave crossed the central Philippines and later hit Vietnam, killing 71 people. After the powerful Typhoon Goni, Tropical Storm Atsani reached peak intensity southeast of Taiwan before dissipating. In early November, Tropical Storm Etau struck southeastern Vietnam, followed days later by Typhoon Vamco, which crossed the Philippines and hit central Vietnam. 2020 North Indian Ocean cyclone season - after a long hiatus, the season sprang to life with one deep depression and two tropical depressions in October. Deep Depression BOB 02 killed 98 people in Central India, and flooded the city of Hyderabad. The system redeveloped into a depression in the Arabian Sea. Later in the month, a depression struck West Bengal. In November, Cyclone Gati explosively intensified before hitting northeastern Somalia, becoming the strongest tropical cyclone on record there; Gati killed at least eight people after dropping more than a year's worth of rain. Later in the month, Cyclone Nivar struck southeastern India. As the month ended, another depression was developing east of Sri Lanka. 2020–21 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season - The season began in November when Tropical Cyclone Alicia formed in the central Indian Ocean, alongside a tropical depression. 2020–21 Australian region cyclone season - The season also began in November with a tropical low in the central Indian Ocean. Member of the month (edition) – Robloxsupersuperhappyface Robloxsupersuperhappyface joined Wikipedia in July of this year, and has become the most prolific tropical cyclone editor relating to current events, as well as playing an enormous role in creation of newly formed tropical cyclones that eventually became destructive in many regions they are affected in ( Hurricane Sally to Gulf Coast of the United States, Typhoon Goni to the Philippines, and Hurricane Iota to Central America respectively - Also, both Goni and Iota are Storms of the Month!). Because of that reason, Robloxsupersuperhappyface's articles are the one of the most viewed tropical cyclone articles in this year - as well as helped us on inviting prospective tropical cyclone editors to this project as they edited Robloxsupersuperhappyface's articles, leading into why we have more than 100 members in this WikiProject leading to this issue. As the result of brilliant Robloxsupersuperhappyface's contributions, we want to give many, many thanks to Super for helping this WikiProject grow so much recently. Happy Thanksgiving! New WikiProject Members since the last newsletter - project membership is over 100 now! More information can be found here. This list lists members who have joined/rejoined the WikiProject since the release of the last issue. Sorted chronologically in order of which they joined. Funnycomixking ( talk · contribs) JackGordean ( talk · contribs) (Added to WPTC because of expressing interest directly) ARegularWisconsinite ( talk · contribs) CyclonicStormYutu ( talk · contribs) ARay10 ( talk · contribs) Gex4pls ( talk · contribs) Nioni1234 ( talk · contribs) HurricaneTracker495 ( talk · contribs) Jangmi20 ( talk · contribs) (Added to WPTC because of userbox) Dannisom ( talk · contribs) (Added to WPTC because of expressing interest directly) Qwerty325 ( talk · contribs) Skarmory ( talk · contribs) Moline1 ( talk · contribs) HurricaneIcy ( talk · contribs) Beraniladri19 ( talk · contribs) Cristianpogi678 ( talk · contribs) Miguel 04012010 ( talk · contribs) Cyclonetracker ( talk · contribs) Dam222 ( talk · contribs) (Added to WPTC because of userbox) Hi 022828 ( talk · contribs) Elijahandskip ( talk · contribs) (WikiProject Current Events Coordinator!) TovarishhUlyanov ( talk · contribs) Animem 1 ( talk · contribs) Shift674 ( talk · contribs) HurricaneGeek ( talk · contribs) ThePelicanThing ( talk · contribs) FinnTheHurricaneFanatic ( talk · contribs) 8medalkid ( talk · contribs) Vida0007 ( talk · contribs) TFESS ( talk · contribs) KILLERXR ( talk · contribs) To our new members: welcome to the project, and happy editing! Feel free to check the to-do list at the bottom right of the newsletter for things that you might want to work on. To our veteran members: thank you for your edits and your tireless contributions! Let's talk about that - An opinion piece by Weatherman27 Before I start, I would like to link everyone to a new essay regarding Force Thirteen. Here it is: WP:F13. I recommend users (old and new) to read this to understand why we don't use Force Thirteen as a source, and why it isn't a reliable source. If you want to see what good reliable sources are, read this: WP:WPTC/AS Now, I will get to the main point of this opinion piece. Recently, I have gotten more involved in talk pages, and sharing my ideas and/or my opinions on different issues or ideas that have come up, primarily on 2020 Atlantic hurricane season's talk page. As I have discussed these thoughts and ideas with other editors, I have noticed and experienced some things such as being personally attacked, which has led me to want to reiterated some key points here. Despite the fact that they are mentioned commonly at the top of talk pages, I want to bring these up as it is important to have a good base where people can properly chat and discuss topics in peace. 1. Treat others with respect This one can't be stressed enough. Especially on talk pages, it is a place where you and your peers communicate issues, opinions, or ideas to each-other. This means discussing topics in a kind and adult manner. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing in what somebody may say, but that does not mean that you have the right to put them down for not having similar views. It is simply the Golden Rule. 2. Assume Good faith Along with my first point, I feel this one needs to be brought up. People have different opinions, and that is all right, but just because you may not agree with it or what they say, does not mean that it was not out of good faith. They were most likely voicing what they think on the subject, and that is alright. This also goes for edits. Unless it is pretty obvious that a user as vandalized something, it is always good to assume good faith, as other people might not know the rules as well as a more experienced editor. 3. Avoid Personal attacks This is a very important subject that needs to be remembered not just on talk pages, but on all other parts of Wikipedia as well. On talk pages, discussions can get pretty tense and heated, and I admit that I have gotten into a few of these arguments as well. Despite this, it is never okay to attack someone. As a user who has gotten personally attacked before, I can definitely say that it does not feel good, and usually the person who made the attacked will get warned or blocked, so please be kind and accept what other people have to say, because you will get nowhere by being rude. 4. Come to a consensus (preferably a clear one) On talk pages, whenever there is a discussion regarding something important like the merging of an article, people need to decide what the outcome of something important on a talk page. For example, if there is say, a merge discussion for an article on a tropical cyclone, many people will give their input. Usually, different people will have different views on whether to merge or keep the article. Sometimes, the editor will close the discussion early, but this is usually for unrelated reasons, though it sometimes may be because the editor had a change of mind. Now, if there is support for say a merge of the article, then that will be the consensus and the discussion will be closed and the article merged. This can also happen on the opposite side, if an article is to be kept, the discussion will be closed and article kept. Simply put, it is important to discuss and come to a clear decision if there is a consensus involved, to avoid difficulty with the article or page in the future. These are just a few examples of things that editors of the WPTC need to remember when using talk page discussions. There are plenty of other things not mentioned here that are just as important when it comes to using talk pages. I made this simply to help remind editors the key points when using the discussions, and I hope these were helpful to new users as well as veterans. We need to really get better at staying calm and keeping civil. I have noticed lots of hostility and arguing lately, as well as edit warring and disputes. We need to work this out. We are supposed to work together as WPTC editors, so please fix it. It is sad seeing so many editors getting reported or having to get blocked from this. Once again, keep discussions civil and have a good day. Signing off, 🌀 Weatherman27🏈 My experiences as a WikiProject Tropical cyclones member by SMB99thx Hello again, people of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones! In here, I want to tell how my experiences with WikiProject Tropical Cyclones changed my views on WikiProjects, helped me out of trouble and to be able to regain the trust of many people in Wikipedia. When I joined WikiProject Tropical cyclones, it was the second WikiProject I have ever joined. The first WikiProject I have ever joined is WikiProject COVID-19, and the reason why I joined that project is to gain trust of people when I contributed to COVID-19 articles and as well as my fight against an IP editor which turned out to be the LTA named Bedriczwaleta (and has been active much more longer than I thought, since February of last year (!!!!)). I have the same thought process (and combined with my plans of editing old season articles, which is not done yet) when I first joined this WikiProject, but joining the WikiProject Tropical cyclones turned out to be something different. It led me to know what are the purposes of WikiProjects are and in turn led me to join many other WikiProjects since. As such, what made me change my views on WikiProjects during my time as a WikiProject Tropical Cyclones? First of all, I have seen that WikiProject Tropical cyclones members always actively work together to advance project goals, actively participating in discussions and give much-needed advice on new WikiProject Tropical cyclones members (including me). Second, WPTC really cares about our articles (and the assessments) as part of their project goals. 2018 FT project and Meteorological history of Hurricane Dorian (Four Award!) is a prime example of this. Third, we are actively welcoming the new members of this WikiProject and giving these members opportunity to succeed with us by i.e. giving out WikiLove (barnstars). Fourth, we, like WP COVID-19, actively fight against vandals and other LTAs e.g. Sidow........., UnderArmorKid, and Iphonehurricane95. These kinds of activity led me to change my belief on what WikiProjects truly are. You could see this kind of activity on other good WikiProjects like WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors, which I just joined recently on 26 October 2020 as of this newsletter and WikiProject Articles of Creation, which I have interest on joining but I might not be able to. Now, why WikiProject Tropical cyclones brought me out of trouble (and Chicdat, for that matter)? WikiProject Tropical cyclones is generally a content-creating WikiProject. We really care about improving tropical cyclone coverage on Wikipedia. Members of this WikiProject generally encouraged to communicate and discuss (in Wikipedia, in Discord, or in IRC channel), and this is what helped me and Chicdat out from trouble since our discussions from what I have seen is not always administrative. Before I joined WikiProject Tropical cyclones (and when I was still new to WikiProject Tropical cyclones), I have been putting myself on trouble numerous times. I was an ANI regular, and as an ANI regular I detailed about my struggle to deal with the LTA Bedriczwaleta and I'm was also putting up IBAN proposals of User:Jadebenn and User:Moamem as well as User:U1Quattro and User:1292simon. While I have managed to get my proposal succeeded and finally got Bedriczwaleta back on track for a while (what I thought), in August 20 (as I was about to finalize my decision to enter my college I'm currently in right now) I got myself into serious trouble against IP range 185.66.252.0/23 (which is apparently good at programming - I'm not). I tried to get them blocked for PA (calling me a thief who has a black soul), but this is where when I realized that I had to attribute things I copied within Wikipedia and I had to apologize to the user. Since then, I did my best to attribute everything I had copied articles from ( Example) and I also realized that ANI is not for me (as I do not want to get into troubles by just being there), which led me to quitting ANI until November of this year when I decided to involve myself on Miggy72 dispute (now banned for sockpuppetry - Miggy72 could have been invited to WPTC if he stopped on insisting to create non-notable topics). After that incident with the IP range 185.66.252.0/23, I have stated that I do not want to get myself into trouble as a presence in ANI. As such, I decided to focus on what I want to do, which is to continue my project of splitting season articles of the yesteryear and began to increasingly involve myself within the project - to look for help and giving the best help that I can do for this WikiProject. The activity from that September led me to become Member of the Month in the previous edition of this newsletter. It was a comeback that I needed, and I want to thank WikiProject Tropical cyclones (especially Hurricanehink) for getting me on this situation. Without their help, I'm not sure if I could be here on this day. Now, for the final question – why this WikiProject helped me (and Chicdat) regain trust of many people in Wikipedia? As I stated before, this WikiProject encourages discussion within other members of this WikiProject, which in turn encourages close involvement in all sides of this WikiProject. Because of this, some people are actually helping us learning policies in Wikipedia as the time goes on, rather than falling in into blocks. As such, with time, I have seen that some admins are open for Chicdat to become a rollbacker, while I got hold on several automated gadgets that was more useful. It appears that these tools are the reason why these people are one of the more trusted people in Wikipedia, which in turn helped me a lot at gaining trust. Someday in the future, I'm looking to become an admin by myself. But that's for the another day. For now, what I'm currently doing now is to work at my craft to eventually prepare for the day when I will seek for adminship in the years ahead. In conclusion, you can see that this WikiProject helped me to regain my standing, alongside Chicdat, Nioni1234, Cristianpogi678, HurricaneTracker495 - and of course - CyclonicallyDeranged! If not for this WikiProject, I don't think they are will be here. Chicdat could have been CIR-blocked like Prahlad balaji and PythonSwarm, Nioni1234 and Cristianpogi678 ending up like Binbin0111 and Miggy72, HurricaneTracker495 would have a trouble establishing himself (or probably will never establish theirselves and stay as an IP) and CyclonicallyDeranged fully driven out from Wikipedia. By the way, to me, both Binbin0111 and Miggy72 are young, but unfortunately they took on the wrong path (Binbin0111 was one of the earliest Force Thirteen insinuators - Binbin0111 is probably the impetus of Force Thirteen policy in this project (as it was made back in 2017), while Miggy72... we know what happened). I feel bad for them, especially Binbin0111. Had Binbin0111 is willing to learn and took steps forward to become productive young editor like Yellow Evan and two other resilient young editors I have mentioned did, Binbin0111 could have been one of the most valuable editors in this project, especially in matters related to Western Pacific basin, and in extension, Vietnam. That's it. That's what I have to say. College is increasingly getting into my feelings right now, but I will do my best as I can coming into December. Sorry if I have a bad English. Thanks for reading this opinion piece! Greetings from Indonesia, SMB9 9thx my edits! Write the next issue of The Hurricane Herald →

The article East Bay Grease (genre) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article appears to be more about a group by name East Bay Grease than a musical genre. The references to not speak to this genre, and are not reliable sources. The content speaks of the rise and fall and re-forming of bands and not this genre.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru ( talk) 05:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited KFMD-FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Final Countdown.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Heart of America Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haswell (microarchitecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivy Bridge.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Psychedelic country, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Psychedelic country".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford ( talk) 16:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Math rock, you may be blocked from editing. Woodroar ( talk) 12:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wolfgang Van Halen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tremonti.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Different Kind of Truth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Anthony.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Journey (band). Toddst1 ( talk) 00:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply

... and at Rhythm and blues, and elsewhere. This is in no way a reliable source. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 06:43, 25 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Cars even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Thank you. - FlightTime ( open channel) 18:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talladega County, Alabama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC) reply

The article New wave soul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page where the only two linked pages has a related title

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giraffer ^{( talk· contribs)} 20:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hard music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hard pop.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to King Crimson. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doc Strange ^Mailbox Logbook 19:47, 15 January 2022 (UTC) reply

I note you turned the Alternative music redirect into a disambiguation page. This created around 600 ambiguous links. About half have been fixed, however many of the others are not clear cut and it would be great if you could help changing the links form a disambiguation page to more approriate articles. The remaining issues are shown at Disambig fix list for Alternative music. Thanks— Rod ^talk 16:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Piano rock (genre) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 8#Piano rock (genre) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electronic rock, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cabaret Voltaire, Icehouse and My Best Friend's Girl.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Indie jazz and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 13#Indie jazz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Big Whiskeys.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 18:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC) reply

At Breaking the Girl, you said in your edit summary that you listened to the song and decided what genre it should be.

On Wikipedia, that's a violation of WP:No original research. Rather than listen to songs and judge them, we summarize what has been published about songs. Even deaf editors can successfully edit music articles. Binksternet ( talk) 02:14, 4 May 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barrel House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrel House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow • 09:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Stone Cold (Rainbow song). Binksternet ( talk) 14:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Barrel House logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 15:43, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Christian disco and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 22#Christian disco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:18, 22 June 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Interstate 50 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#Interstate 50 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Waddles  🗩  🖉 22:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interstate 50 (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 50 (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– Waddles  🗩  🖉 23:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at East Bay Grease. Binksternet ( talk) 04:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Whiskey's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Whiskey's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MB 01:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Devo. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Ad Orientem ( talk) 01:32, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Moody Blues even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Thank you. - FlightTime ( open channel) 03:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 United States Senate election in Vermont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electronic metal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Piano rock (term), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FishandChipper 🐟 🍟 03:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Synthedelia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Right now, one of your sources doesn't work, one doesn't mention the term, and the third is from an unreliable source. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:20, 18 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Math rap and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Math rap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Glam punk. Binksternet ( talk) 20:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Collin County, Texas. Magnolia677 ( talk) 19:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Piano rock (term), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The file File:2022 Arkansas gubernatorial election results map by county1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, redundant to vector File:2022 Arkansas gubernatorial election results map by county.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. House Blaster ^talk 14:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Piano rock".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Moline1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Synthedelia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soul metal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul metal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMSky ( talk) 04:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Soul metal indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Soul metal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. FMSky ( talk) 18:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Soul metal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 27 § Soul metal until a consensus is reached. Tollens ( talk) 18:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

I find the level of comments, warnings, and articles deleted as a result of your ignoring our sourcing and original research guidance extremely concerning. Recent edits suggest you're still not understanding things, such as your recreation of the redirect for soul metal as a redirect to an article that contains zero sources (or even mentions) of the concept of "soul metal".

Final warning - any more violations of WP:V or WP:OR is going to get your account blocked from editing. You need to start taking this seriously. Sergecross73 msg me 18:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Countrycore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countrycore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMSky ( talk) 01:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart of America Group Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 05:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Heart of America Group Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Country metal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 30 § Country metal until a consensus is reached. FMSky ( talk) 08:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Countrycore has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 2 § Countrycore until a consensus is reached. Notifying you as you created the article of the same name that was deleted at AfD, and you don’t seem to yet have been notified of this RfD discussion. Best, A smart kitten ( talk) 11:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deacon Frey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deacon Frey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WWGB ( talk) 05:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect Latincore has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 11 § Latincore until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 08:13, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metalbilly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metalbilly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMSky ( talk) 04:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Guitar pop (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 12:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Arena metal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § Arena metal until a consensus is reached. FMSky ( talk) 22:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doom music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doom music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FMSky ( talk) 22:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I already gave you a final warning about following WP:V and WP:OR last year, and a recent review of your edits shows that you've been consistent disregarding it and adding unsourced content.

You are blocked for 2 weeks. Next time will be indefinite. Get it together. Sergecross73 msg me 22:53, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Classical music in hip hop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG and WP:NOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FMSky ( talk) 21:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everyone Knows That (Ulterior Motives) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everyone Knows That (Ulterior Motives) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pyraminxsolver ( talk) 04:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Metaltronica has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 2 § Metaltronica until a consensus is reached. FMSky ( talk) 16:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Knox2023Interview.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Justarandomamerican ( talk) Have a good day! 21:39, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

 Note: I find it quite likely this image is non-free. Justarandomamerican ( talk) Have a good day! 21:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your edits continue to have sourcing issues no matter how many times you're warned. Your account is blocked, but you can still edit your talk page. You are blocked until you can satisfactorily explain the concepts of WP:V and WP:OR to myself or another admin. Part of it should also include explaining how you will stop making errors like this in the future, and, for example, explaining what was wrong with this edit. Sergecross73 msg me 13:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

WP:V means that other people can check the encyclopedic content for verifiability whilst WP:OR means original research is not allowed. I added U2 to the alternative dance article as all of their albums in the 1990s (sans 1995's Original Soundtracks 1 with Brian Eno) embraced that style, and all of them were big successes for the band (particularly Achtung Baby), so I thought it should be stated that they contributed to the style (as the rest of the article ignores the band's alt-dance contributions currently) alongside New Order, Fatboy Slim, and The Prodigy (who make up the Big 4 of alt-dance imo). I am sorry for not including a source for my edit, and will do better at including them from now on. Moline1 ( talk) 20:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Do you understand how to add sources? Why didn't you add a source to the alt dance article when you've been warned and blocked for this before? What source do you feel verifies the U2 addition to the alt dance article in the context of your addition? Sergecross73 msg me 22:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

After looking over Achtung Baby, Zooropa, and Pop, none of them are called alternative dance. Pop has the genre listed, but the article does not mention it itself, meaning that is unsourced, and should be removed (as should my claim on the alt-dance article). I apologize for not finding a source. My mind was in a not so good place when I made the edit. I'll be better about finding sources from here on out! Moline1 ( talk) 23:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I'm not (yet) fully convinced that this editor truly understands the issue at hand. Since returning from the previous unsourced editing block (which was already their second), they also made this unsourced content addition. Apologies and promises help, but can only go so far. Moline1, in addition to the questions raised above, maybe, just maybe, describing specific types of edits you wish/plan to make and showing specific sources you'd use for such edits would be helpful for a convincing unblock request. But I'm not an admin, so this is merely a suggestion and not a guarantee. (Non-administrator comment) Left guide ( talk) 02:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I looked back at that edit, and went to the This Note's for You article, and found no source cited for the lawsuit by Harold Melvin, but I found a suitable source from Ultimate Classic Rock that can be used to source the claims on both pages. https://ultimateclassicrock.com/neil-young-this-notes-for-you/ Moline1 ( talk) 03:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

If you wish to make an unblock request, please refer to WP:Appealing a block and WP:Guide to appealing blocks, and then use the {{ unblock}} template to explain your case. (Non-administrator comment) Left guide ( talk) 06:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

What claims are you referring to though? That source doesn't appear to mention a lawsuit so I'm not following what you're using that source for... Sergecross73 msg me 13:56, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The lawsuit spiel is towards the bottom of the UCR source. Here is that text from it: "Then the group had to change the Bluenotes moniker after a lawsuit arrived from ‘70s R&B star Harold Melvin, who led his own band called the Blue Notes. This Note’s for You was reissued without their name. Not that it mattered much, because few people heard or bought the album."

Read More: How Neil Young's 'This Note's for You' Ended an Era of Stumbles | https://ultimateclassicrock.com/neil-young-this-notes-for-you/?utm_source=tsmclip&utm_medium=referral Moline1 ( talk) 14:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Gotcha. I missed it. Sergecross73 msg me 15:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I've revised your block time from indef to 1 month. I'm happy that you're finally talking and trying to learn how to do this right, but disappointed that your most recent edits and subsequent block seem to come from a blatant disregard for policies you've been warned about at length prior. Please take the month to firm up your understand of WP:V and WP:OR. As far as I'm concerned, there won't be any further second chances after this, so you want to make sure you really get it moving forward. Sergecross73 msg me 15:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you! I will do that! Moline1 ( talk) 22:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

{{ unblock|reason=I will stop adding unsourced content and make sure what I am adding is reliably sourced. ~~~~}} Moline1 ( talk) 14:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The redirect Post-punk metal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 31 § Post-punk metal until a consensus is reached. FMSky ( talk) 13:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply