Hi Melledelle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Love of Corey ( talk) 06:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Inexpiable. I noticed that you recently removed content from
List of people executed in Arkansas without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Inexpiable (
talk) 07:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Beccaynr. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Jana Sanchez without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Beccaynr (
talk) 19:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexander Jobst for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Jobst until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
scope_creep Talk 17:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Onni Valakari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Giant
Snowman 10:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Eremenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doping. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Kevin Rodeblad Lowe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 21:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Superettan is a pro league bro Melledelle ( talk) 21:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Please don't make stuff up, as with the quote you added that is not in the source you added. [1] - Sitush ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
LongLivePortugal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Conservatism, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
LongLivePortugal (
talk) 12:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
CS1 error on Systembolaget
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Systembolaget, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 13:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
On 13 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 13:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes of course. Melledelle ( talk) 13:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from posting disruptive topics on Talk:South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention)
This is the second time your discussion has been removed, per WP:ARBECR. Please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia rules, and the active arbitration remedies for that talk page, before creating a new comment. Thanks. Historyday01 ( talk) 20:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have not been doing that. All topics have been necessary.
Melledelle (
talk) 21:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Um, I have to disagree. Your topics HAVE been disruptive and unconstructive.
Historyday01 (
talk) 13:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- That is NOT true. Thanks. Melledelle ( talk) 14:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Um, I have to disagree. Your topics HAVE been disruptive and unconstructive.
Historyday01 (
talk) 13:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
== Welcome! ==
Hi Melledelle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Selfstudier ( talk) 14:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This edit has been reverted as it is not an edit request, which is all that is permitted to non Ec editors. I see above that a previous reminder has been given concerning WP:ARBECR, please ensure that you comply with this restriction. Thank you. Selfstudier ( talk) 14:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Melledelle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Love of Corey ( talk) 06:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Inexpiable. I noticed that you recently removed content from
List of people executed in Arkansas without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page.
Inexpiable (
talk) 07:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Beccaynr. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Jana Sanchez without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Beccaynr (
talk) 19:40, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexander Jobst for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Jobst until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
scope_creep Talk 17:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Onni Valakari have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Giant
Snowman 10:33, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Eremenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doping. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Kevin Rodeblad Lowe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk) 21:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Superettan is a pro league bro Melledelle ( talk) 21:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Please don't make stuff up, as with the quote you added that is not in the source you added. [1] - Sitush ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
LongLivePortugal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Conservatism, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
LongLivePortugal (
talk) 12:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
CS1 error on Systembolaget
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Systembolaget, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 13:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 18:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Véronique Trillet-Lenoir
On 13 August 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 13:16, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes of course. Melledelle ( talk) 13:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from posting disruptive topics on Talk:South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention)
This is the second time your discussion has been removed, per WP:ARBECR. Please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia rules, and the active arbitration remedies for that talk page, before creating a new comment. Thanks. Historyday01 ( talk) 20:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- I have not been doing that. All topics have been necessary.
Melledelle (
talk) 21:09, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Um, I have to disagree. Your topics HAVE been disruptive and unconstructive.
Historyday01 (
talk) 13:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- That is NOT true. Thanks. Melledelle ( talk) 14:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Um, I have to disagree. Your topics HAVE been disruptive and unconstructive.
Historyday01 (
talk) 13:38, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
== Welcome! ==
Hi Melledelle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Selfstudier ( talk) 14:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
This edit has been reverted as it is not an edit request, which is all that is permitted to non Ec editors. I see above that a previous reminder has been given concerning WP:ARBECR, please ensure that you comply with this restriction. Thank you. Selfstudier ( talk) 14:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)