Hey, this is a geniune and wide spread belief about Austin St. John, it shouldn't be removed. A simple internet search using http://www.google.com will reveal countless hits of pages that believe it to be true. It belongs on his page, for both posterity, and to prove to others that he is not one in the same with this gay actor.
http://gayredpowerranger DOT ytmnd DOT com is one an example of the image that is WIDELY spread around the internet, claiming they are the same man.
Ok, you probably don't remember me, but you erased my edits on how attractive the Sprouse twins' feet are. Well, now I got proof! http://www.geocities.com/zacefronfeet/ So, I'm going to go edit the Sprouse page soon and I trust you won't be reverting it. Thank you Malevious. Signed, Sprouse Foot Worshipper
I am new to Wiki. I researched and even interviewed the person I wrote an article about. I titled the article Troy Hobza. He is a Profesional Wrestling Ring Announcer for MWA Professional Wrestling on TV. It wasn;t any more than 20 minutes later and some warning appeared on my artcile stating that it was going to be deleted. This is why I left Wiki before. Because I cant communicate with anyone on here. Everything I wrote about Troy hobza was completely factual and there is no reason to delete the article. I put alot of time and effort into the article. Please tell me how to fix this so my article doesnt get deleted. Please?
Journal247 ( talk)Melissa Journal247 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC).
I need help putting up a picture from a website. CrocGator
ok thanks for advice, but why cant we put 2008 movies even if they're confirmed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndrwatthedisco ( talk • contribs)
Why did you revert my edit? -- Charleenmerced Talk 23:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced
Malevious, a bit of advice: I notice that many of your contributions are marked as "minor edits" but are reverts or undos. Per Help:Minor edit, however, a minor edit is a "...typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, et cetera. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Though you may disagree with a user's contributions and regard them as vandalism, nonsense or information-cruft, reverting anyone's additions is likely subject to review and may be subject to a dispute. Indeed, "...any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit is a single word." May I suggest that you only mark edits as minor when they fail within the criteria set out at Help:Minor edit? Regards, Iamunknown 06:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring this article :) -- [[User:ricmitch|ricmitch]] 23:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Making these article redirects has been discussed and decided upon at the Administrators' Noticeboard; please don't revert — and giving no edit-summary and calling your revert a minor edit make your action even more disruptive. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 23:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
First, the linked WikiProject said nothing about tone; secondly, WikiProjects don't override the Manual of Style (it's the other way round); thirdly, what is it about the language that you think I'm referring to? As you haven't bothered to ask, I assume that you're certain you know. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 10:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why don't you wait until someone whose first language is English, and who can tell the difference between formal and slang English, can overhaul it? I'll do it myself when I get a chance, if no-one beats me to it. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 23:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, you probably think that I'm being stubborn for the hell of it, but if anything things are a bit worse, with sections like: "Zack overhears Maddie saying she likes a boy but there is an age difference and think she means him. It turns out Maddie is interested in a boy who is 3years older than her.." I'll try to do a copyedit in a minute. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 18:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
im sory if i cosed truble the dark king will never die 19:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I was reverting Mel Etitis' edits this morning, but stopped I think you two need to talk things through, you two aren't really sorting things out as best they could be. I think you were right about consensus. Whiskey in the Jar 15:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I think thats the right approach to take, I'll pop over to his page and suggest the idea again. Ultimately, the only way to solve these approaches is through consensus. Safety in numbers and all! Whiskey in the Jar 15:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
What is encyclopædic about the fact that an episode of a children's television series was an hour long? Why does that deserve more than a mention in the list of episodes? -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 17:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it would help you to look at WP:BITE and WP:AGF, because these are important guidelines for users, especialy administrators to follow. And comments like "The edit was made by an admin who has more authority on the matter than you do. End of story." would be considered biting, I think. If this RfA doesn't pass, I would encourage you to work on those guidelines and eventually re-apply, and will wish you good luck on that.-- U.S.A. cubed 19:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the star. =] Imageboy1 21:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
If you look at the article Scotia-Glenville High School, you can see how the lines stay even if I leave it blank. I'm not sure how to avoid this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Garvey ( talk • contribs)
I have added references to the three books I have writen for when employed at The Onion. I will be adding more non-Onion material soon when I can get dates/ISBN numbers organized. If there is a better way to cite this information, please let me know. Thank you. SpyMagician 19:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
She appears in TVF-VillainParty, in Global Gemini and his suposed as a major villain, and his not a single episode villain
Thanks, Ben-spam
Thank you for your help on List of Disney Channel Original Movies. Lord Hawk 02:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
With respect to your recent AFD nominations on Kim Possible characters, you may be interested in reading WP:MERGE and WP:FICT. The short answer is that you're entirely correct and you can fix such problems by editing yourself, without the need for a deletion debate. Happy editing! >Radiant< 13:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Please see the article's discussion page. Thank you. Artemisboy 23:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Stop adding a final air date of June 2007 without a source, and read the comment that it CONSTANTLY says next to it:
“ | If you wish to modify the final airdate, please do so only with the accompanying addition of a reliable source specifically supporting your claim. If you are unaware of what constitute reliable sources, please see WP:RS for details. | ” |
Do you not see that quote?
Now STOP vandalizing the PAGE. 74.225.211.177 02:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm writing to invite you to reconsider your opposition on the RfA of LessHeard vanU. It's not that I have a particular stake in it and it's not like it's likely to matter much given the support he's receiving but opposing on the basis that the candidate does not have a full map of the work he intends to do as an admin is quite simply and really has little to do with the RfA process which should be about a particular user's experience, trustworthiness and behaviour on Wikipedia. If I recall, your answer to that very same question 1 in your RfA was pretty vague and that wasn't held against you (as far as I remember). Pascal.Tesson 02:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
You are right, it cannot be "known", but the likelihood is very slight. A citizen of a non English speaking nation, editing the en-Wikipedia on a subject which is a sensitive matter for their culture, being exposed on a non-Wiki (English language) site and then being discovered by an authority from the non-English speaking nation... there are far too many variables to justify an extension of policy on that basis. My other assumption is that the English speaking cultures are not prone to execute citizens for holding opinions outside of the excepted norms. LessHeard vanU 13:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)</bockquote>
Malevious, thank you for your kind words in support of my RfA, which successfully closed yesterday; and for your support of my sig. In the end, it seemed easiest and least disruptive to just change it back. Please feel free to drop me a line any time if I can help you in any way. Pastordavid 14:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Malevious. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image ( Image:CharmedSeaHag.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/Charmed Info. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 20:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I tried to removed the copyvio and promotional tone from the 3WC article. The original version of the article was a bit confusing, but the station is an FCC-licensed broadcaster, not an Internet-only one, and therefore would be automatically considered notable. -- Eastmain 04:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Malevious, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image ( Image:Smokefree.png) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/smoke-free. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 18:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Malevious, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image ( Image:The Suite Life of Zack and Cody s02e20.png) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/Carey Martin. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 01:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. Viridae Talk 01:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I see you are in the process. Thanks. Viridae Talk 03:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
What the hell is up with you & Ned Scott deleting episodes of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody? Maybe you haven't read that Ned's excuse for deleting it was unjustified. ---- DanTD 16:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing at my recent request for adminship. A few issues were brought up there. I would like to tell you that I am not anti-gay. The creation of the userbox was for other users. If I was, I would have used the userbox within my own userspace. Nor do I seek power; just more ways to help the goals of Wikipedia. Thanks for not being a jerk about it either, as some editors where violating be civil and assume good faith. Its very discouraging, but the editing must go on. Again, thanks for your comments. -- Wikihermit ( Talk • HermesBot) 04:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you stop user ZanessaYay from moving pages please, I saw you did this: moved List Of Disney Channel Original Series to List of Disney Channel series over redirect: this isn't just a list of DCOS)
Which I was grateful for, but ZanessaYay keeps mobing it back
The same issue with this article: List of Series Broadcast By Disney 53180 20:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)53180
Someone still keeps moving the the page List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel to List of Series Broadcast By Disney, is there a way to fix it and make sure it wont be moved again? It won't let me move it myself anymore. 53180 20:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)53180.
I'm not sure why you had to use popups to revert me [2], I can assure you that the top template isn't needed at all. Lord Sesshomaru
I really dont get what your problem is. You stop vandelism, but its only a bit of fun! stop being a computer nerd and go out into the real world. Special:Contributions/Dunks2612
Listen to yourself. That comeback probably took you ages to complete. Your country produces more fuel than the rest of the world and your dumbass president isnt doing anything worthwile. Your country sucks.
When I removed the "Almost all of the primary cast of High School Musical have appeared ..." text, there were 3 exceptions, and 3 of 6 is not most. You changed that to 2 exceptions, which I agree with you classifies as most. I wonder if the phrase "Almost all" is correct though? Enjoy your Wikipedia break. Truthanado 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
'Please help stop redirecting episodes for Zack and cody and having separate episode pages .'
Hiya! I remember you giving some good advice on the deletion issue with Corner Pocket. Because a lot of other people seemed to want a page for the comic, I did as you suggested and made a page for the comic itself and added a disambiguation link. But I'm really new at this... so maybe if you have any other suggestions, I'd really appreciate em. :)
Thanks again! Angerpeas 14:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I did a quick copyedit on the page, fixed some spelling, minor grammer and external links. Without knowing anything about the show, however, I'm somewhat limited in what I can do. Cheers! -- Huntster T • @ • C 19:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
What you say me ? Look IMDB it write ! Mikani 17:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing the lack of fair use rationale on the Power Chamber images. I've tagged them as such, and they will be deleted in a week unless a rationale is provided. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 23:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
American Dragon is ending, and that show is confirmed, why did you delete them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs)
Every website says it is ending, 57 episodes. in my books thats cancelled!
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of terms in Charmed, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of terms in Charmed. Thank you. Corpx 07:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Malevious. It has come to my attention that you're carrying on the attention to Nat Wolff, Alex Wolff, Michael Wolff, Polly Draper and the Naked Brothers Band pages. I grew weary to the task on those pages some time ago, and sincerely thank you for keeping up on them! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
In recognition of your ongoing work in the tedious defense of the Wolff family articles against nonsense and vandalism. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Malevious, I have real info about the Dylan is heavier than Cole thing. DO NOT DELETE IT. IT IS NOT VANDALISM. People don't recieve barnstars for deleting real info, do they? I thought so. 69.115.9.165 02:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Malevious,
The anon you reported to AIV, whom I later blocked, for his consistent reversion of your removal of his unsourced additions to Dylan and Cole Sprouse, wrote to me after it expired. I wrote back explaining myself, and as I did it occurred to me that I ought to remind you to not bite newcomers, not in the sense that you were discourteous or uncivil to him but that you might have checked and seen that, even though an anon, had >50 edits and that you didn't necessarily need to assume the worst. Like so many newcomers, he didn't understand policy, and if you had realized that and done something a bit gentler with his edits like tag them with {{ fact}} instead of deleting them outright and more patiently explained why you might have been a bit concerned with why he should wait till he had a source for that, it might not have escalated to the point where an AIV report was necessary.
You were right to bring it there, as an edit war was developing. But we should have been able to leave ourselves more of a choice. Just a reminder to think about how you can resolves things like this better next time. Daniel Case 03:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for helping revert Allie DiMeco for me. It gets tough sometimes. :P Signed by Tommy ( Talk/ Contribs) 04:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
You recently deleted multiple shows on the List of Disney Channel series, and you added the comment that Arwin! was cancelled. First off, please provide a source that states this. If no source can be provided, then this a rumor and Arwin! should remain on the list. Second off, you removed the entire sectino for 2008, including 3 shows. Please be careful when you make edits. For more discussion on the topic of Arwin! being cancelled, please see Talk:Arwin! (TV series) -- Pilotboi / talk / contribs 23:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you recently made a reversion on this article. Part of what you reverted, though, was correct. That's So Raven ended in Febuary 2007 and no new episodes are scheduled. So the list can be changed to reflect this. Please let me know if you feel that is incorrect, otherwise I'll assume you'll fix it. -- Pilotboi / talk / contribs 04:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I have added the not a ballot template to the AFD. This is because many single purpose accounts may comment if this discussion reaches the Simtropolis forums - something which appeared to happen in previous AFD's of this article. Camaron1 | Chris 20:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
As expected: [3] Camaron1 | Chris 10:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I think you could have at least talked about perging the two Suite Life DVD articles before actually doing so. -- Pilotboi / talk / contribs 19:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
PHINEAS AND FERB IS CONFRIMED LEAVE IT ON THE DCOS PAGE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs)
"For all we know the show could've bombed with todays preview and never see the light of day again" who cares if it never airs again! it still was shown, and that still makes it an original series...and sorry im not on here 24/7 to learn how to operate things, who cares if i dont sign...when i do the episode thing i copy and paste the other "episode" info from another one and put it in there so i dont screw it up if you havent noticed as well everything people complained about here ended up being right! TO PHINEAS AND FERB! HAHAHA! NOW YOU LEAVE IT THERE!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs)
But March is Winter, spring begins Late March early April - yankeesrj12 Userpage
I Just changed it back to the way it was, someone else changed it completely, i put it back to normal - yankeesrj12 userpage
i figured someone would think that...someone deleted all of the original movies (86-96 or w/e it was) and i fixed it all back up, and i accept the appology —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs) 03:18, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
You removed my addition to the article, saying it wasn't menitoned on the page. It appears in "Act Four: My Other Dog's a German Shepherd." Unfortunately, the page doesn't say which TV show he is referring to, but if you listen to the recording offered on the page, he says it (it is a radio show, after all). If you don't want to pay the 95 cents to find out, look at the numerous references to it that I didn't cite because they aren't quite reliable sources: [4], [5], [6]. Unfortunately reliable sources are not always free. This should be included in the article because it offers an adult perspective on the show, by somebody whose job is relevant here (as a love/sex columnist). I don't think that WP:V requires that sources be in print (meaning, I think broadcasts can be cited), nor that they be free, although of course such a source would be preferred. By the way, I appreciate that the page gets a lot of vandalism and you're just trying to prevent more, but I do think this is verifiable and notable. Rigadoun (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Bleach (manga), or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I am quite familiar with 3RR rule. Please use talk instead of disruptive revert warring in mainspace. Thank you, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this, the user had asked me to do it :-) Happy editing! -- Boricu æ ddie 20:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
When you did a revert to an earlier version of the TSL article, unfortunately it re-introduced some vandalism in the process. I fixed it. WAVY 10 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought I did provide a fair use rationale. What's wrong with the one I wrote?
-- JoBrLa 18:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Something Wicca This Way Comes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Wicca This Way Comes. Thank you. Pixelface ( talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode). Thank you. Pixelface ( talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Thank You for Not Morphing, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thank You for Not Morphing. Thank you. Pixelface ( talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate your enthusiasm in clearing copyvios off Wikipedia, [7], but it would help if you do look at the page history before suggesting it be deleted. As per our policy on copy violations, we do not delete the entire article off the face of wikipedia, we only delete the copy violations. Due to the ever changing nature of Wikipedia, copy violations may be added at some point of time by an anon. It would be counter productive to delete an article just because one version was a copyvio. In the future, please do check an article history before declaring it to be a speedy. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
The category should be deleted since you've already nominated the templates, correct? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 06:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
if u watch Disney channel or read magazines the you will be able to confirm the movie. It has been confirmed many times, so it needs to be on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setnick ( talk • contribs) 03:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Cheers from Canada! ;-) -- Rob NS 01:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Idontknow 610 TM 19:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:FullmetalFantasy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Malevious. An image of yours that was uploaded to Commons is under consideration for deletion. Please feel free to view the discussion and comment on the proposal. The image is commons:File:Tree of Life close up.jpg, and the deletion discussion is at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Tree of Life (Disney). Thank you. Powers T 00:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is International Black Belt Federation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Black Belt Federation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
User:Malevious/Carey Martin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Malevious/Carey Martin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Malevious/Carey Martin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey, this is a geniune and wide spread belief about Austin St. John, it shouldn't be removed. A simple internet search using http://www.google.com will reveal countless hits of pages that believe it to be true. It belongs on his page, for both posterity, and to prove to others that he is not one in the same with this gay actor.
http://gayredpowerranger DOT ytmnd DOT com is one an example of the image that is WIDELY spread around the internet, claiming they are the same man.
Ok, you probably don't remember me, but you erased my edits on how attractive the Sprouse twins' feet are. Well, now I got proof! http://www.geocities.com/zacefronfeet/ So, I'm going to go edit the Sprouse page soon and I trust you won't be reverting it. Thank you Malevious. Signed, Sprouse Foot Worshipper
I am new to Wiki. I researched and even interviewed the person I wrote an article about. I titled the article Troy Hobza. He is a Profesional Wrestling Ring Announcer for MWA Professional Wrestling on TV. It wasn;t any more than 20 minutes later and some warning appeared on my artcile stating that it was going to be deleted. This is why I left Wiki before. Because I cant communicate with anyone on here. Everything I wrote about Troy hobza was completely factual and there is no reason to delete the article. I put alot of time and effort into the article. Please tell me how to fix this so my article doesnt get deleted. Please?
Journal247 ( talk)Melissa Journal247 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC).
I need help putting up a picture from a website. CrocGator
ok thanks for advice, but why cant we put 2008 movies even if they're confirmed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndrwatthedisco ( talk • contribs)
Why did you revert my edit? -- Charleenmerced Talk 23:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced
Malevious, a bit of advice: I notice that many of your contributions are marked as "minor edits" but are reverts or undos. Per Help:Minor edit, however, a minor edit is a "...typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, et cetera. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." Though you may disagree with a user's contributions and regard them as vandalism, nonsense or information-cruft, reverting anyone's additions is likely subject to review and may be subject to a dispute. Indeed, "...any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit is a single word." May I suggest that you only mark edits as minor when they fail within the criteria set out at Help:Minor edit? Regards, Iamunknown 06:41, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring this article :) -- [[User:ricmitch|ricmitch]] 23:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Making these article redirects has been discussed and decided upon at the Administrators' Noticeboard; please don't revert — and giving no edit-summary and calling your revert a minor edit make your action even more disruptive. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 23:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
First, the linked WikiProject said nothing about tone; secondly, WikiProjects don't override the Manual of Style (it's the other way round); thirdly, what is it about the language that you think I'm referring to? As you haven't bothered to ask, I assume that you're certain you know. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 10:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Why don't you wait until someone whose first language is English, and who can tell the difference between formal and slang English, can overhaul it? I'll do it myself when I get a chance, if no-one beats me to it. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 23:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, you probably think that I'm being stubborn for the hell of it, but if anything things are a bit worse, with sections like: "Zack overhears Maddie saying she likes a boy but there is an age difference and think she means him. It turns out Maddie is interested in a boy who is 3years older than her.." I'll try to do a copyedit in a minute. -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 18:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
im sory if i cosed truble the dark king will never die 19:07, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I was reverting Mel Etitis' edits this morning, but stopped I think you two need to talk things through, you two aren't really sorting things out as best they could be. I think you were right about consensus. Whiskey in the Jar 15:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I think thats the right approach to take, I'll pop over to his page and suggest the idea again. Ultimately, the only way to solve these approaches is through consensus. Safety in numbers and all! Whiskey in the Jar 15:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
What is encyclopædic about the fact that an episode of a children's television series was an hour long? Why does that deserve more than a mention in the list of episodes? -- Mel Etitis ( Talk) 17:25, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it would help you to look at WP:BITE and WP:AGF, because these are important guidelines for users, especialy administrators to follow. And comments like "The edit was made by an admin who has more authority on the matter than you do. End of story." would be considered biting, I think. If this RfA doesn't pass, I would encourage you to work on those guidelines and eventually re-apply, and will wish you good luck on that.-- U.S.A. cubed 19:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the star. =] Imageboy1 21:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
If you look at the article Scotia-Glenville High School, you can see how the lines stay even if I leave it blank. I'm not sure how to avoid this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Garvey ( talk • contribs)
I have added references to the three books I have writen for when employed at The Onion. I will be adding more non-Onion material soon when I can get dates/ISBN numbers organized. If there is a better way to cite this information, please let me know. Thank you. SpyMagician 19:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
She appears in TVF-VillainParty, in Global Gemini and his suposed as a major villain, and his not a single episode villain
Thanks, Ben-spam
Thank you for your help on List of Disney Channel Original Movies. Lord Hawk 02:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
With respect to your recent AFD nominations on Kim Possible characters, you may be interested in reading WP:MERGE and WP:FICT. The short answer is that you're entirely correct and you can fix such problems by editing yourself, without the need for a deletion debate. Happy editing! >Radiant< 13:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Please see the article's discussion page. Thank you. Artemisboy 23:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Stop adding a final air date of June 2007 without a source, and read the comment that it CONSTANTLY says next to it:
“ | If you wish to modify the final airdate, please do so only with the accompanying addition of a reliable source specifically supporting your claim. If you are unaware of what constitute reliable sources, please see WP:RS for details. | ” |
Do you not see that quote?
Now STOP vandalizing the PAGE. 74.225.211.177 02:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I'm writing to invite you to reconsider your opposition on the RfA of LessHeard vanU. It's not that I have a particular stake in it and it's not like it's likely to matter much given the support he's receiving but opposing on the basis that the candidate does not have a full map of the work he intends to do as an admin is quite simply and really has little to do with the RfA process which should be about a particular user's experience, trustworthiness and behaviour on Wikipedia. If I recall, your answer to that very same question 1 in your RfA was pretty vague and that wasn't held against you (as far as I remember). Pascal.Tesson 02:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
You are right, it cannot be "known", but the likelihood is very slight. A citizen of a non English speaking nation, editing the en-Wikipedia on a subject which is a sensitive matter for their culture, being exposed on a non-Wiki (English language) site and then being discovered by an authority from the non-English speaking nation... there are far too many variables to justify an extension of policy on that basis. My other assumption is that the English speaking cultures are not prone to execute citizens for holding opinions outside of the excepted norms. LessHeard vanU 13:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)</bockquote>
Malevious, thank you for your kind words in support of my RfA, which successfully closed yesterday; and for your support of my sig. In the end, it seemed easiest and least disruptive to just change it back. Please feel free to drop me a line any time if I can help you in any way. Pastordavid 14:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Malevious. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image ( Image:CharmedSeaHag.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/Charmed Info. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 20:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I tried to removed the copyvio and promotional tone from the 3WC article. The original version of the article was a bit confusing, but the station is an FCC-licensed broadcaster, not an Internet-only one, and therefore would be automatically considered notable. -- Eastmain 04:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Malevious, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image ( Image:Smokefree.png) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/smoke-free. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 18:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Malevious, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image ( Image:The Suite Life of Zack and Cody s02e20.png) was found at the following location: User:Malevious/Carey Martin. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 01:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. Viridae Talk 01:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC) I see you are in the process. Thanks. Viridae Talk 03:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
What the hell is up with you & Ned Scott deleting episodes of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody? Maybe you haven't read that Ned's excuse for deleting it was unjustified. ---- DanTD 16:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing at my recent request for adminship. A few issues were brought up there. I would like to tell you that I am not anti-gay. The creation of the userbox was for other users. If I was, I would have used the userbox within my own userspace. Nor do I seek power; just more ways to help the goals of Wikipedia. Thanks for not being a jerk about it either, as some editors where violating be civil and assume good faith. Its very discouraging, but the editing must go on. Again, thanks for your comments. -- Wikihermit ( Talk • HermesBot) 04:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you stop user ZanessaYay from moving pages please, I saw you did this: moved List Of Disney Channel Original Series to List of Disney Channel series over redirect: this isn't just a list of DCOS)
Which I was grateful for, but ZanessaYay keeps mobing it back
The same issue with this article: List of Series Broadcast By Disney 53180 20:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)53180
Someone still keeps moving the the page List of programs broadcast by Disney Channel to List of Series Broadcast By Disney, is there a way to fix it and make sure it wont be moved again? It won't let me move it myself anymore. 53180 20:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)53180.
I'm not sure why you had to use popups to revert me [2], I can assure you that the top template isn't needed at all. Lord Sesshomaru
I really dont get what your problem is. You stop vandelism, but its only a bit of fun! stop being a computer nerd and go out into the real world. Special:Contributions/Dunks2612
Listen to yourself. That comeback probably took you ages to complete. Your country produces more fuel than the rest of the world and your dumbass president isnt doing anything worthwile. Your country sucks.
When I removed the "Almost all of the primary cast of High School Musical have appeared ..." text, there were 3 exceptions, and 3 of 6 is not most. You changed that to 2 exceptions, which I agree with you classifies as most. I wonder if the phrase "Almost all" is correct though? Enjoy your Wikipedia break. Truthanado 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
'Please help stop redirecting episodes for Zack and cody and having separate episode pages .'
Hiya! I remember you giving some good advice on the deletion issue with Corner Pocket. Because a lot of other people seemed to want a page for the comic, I did as you suggested and made a page for the comic itself and added a disambiguation link. But I'm really new at this... so maybe if you have any other suggestions, I'd really appreciate em. :)
Thanks again! Angerpeas 14:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I did a quick copyedit on the page, fixed some spelling, minor grammer and external links. Without knowing anything about the show, however, I'm somewhat limited in what I can do. Cheers! -- Huntster T • @ • C 19:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
What you say me ? Look IMDB it write ! Mikani 17:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing the lack of fair use rationale on the Power Chamber images. I've tagged them as such, and they will be deleted in a week unless a rationale is provided. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 23:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
American Dragon is ending, and that show is confirmed, why did you delete them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs)
Every website says it is ending, 57 episodes. in my books thats cancelled!
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of terms in Charmed, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of terms in Charmed. Thank you. Corpx 07:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Malevious. It has come to my attention that you're carrying on the attention to Nat Wolff, Alex Wolff, Michael Wolff, Polly Draper and the Naked Brothers Band pages. I grew weary to the task on those pages some time ago, and sincerely thank you for keeping up on them! SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
In recognition of your ongoing work in the tedious defense of the Wolff family articles against nonsense and vandalism. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 19:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC) |
Malevious, I have real info about the Dylan is heavier than Cole thing. DO NOT DELETE IT. IT IS NOT VANDALISM. People don't recieve barnstars for deleting real info, do they? I thought so. 69.115.9.165 02:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Malevious,
The anon you reported to AIV, whom I later blocked, for his consistent reversion of your removal of his unsourced additions to Dylan and Cole Sprouse, wrote to me after it expired. I wrote back explaining myself, and as I did it occurred to me that I ought to remind you to not bite newcomers, not in the sense that you were discourteous or uncivil to him but that you might have checked and seen that, even though an anon, had >50 edits and that you didn't necessarily need to assume the worst. Like so many newcomers, he didn't understand policy, and if you had realized that and done something a bit gentler with his edits like tag them with {{ fact}} instead of deleting them outright and more patiently explained why you might have been a bit concerned with why he should wait till he had a source for that, it might not have escalated to the point where an AIV report was necessary.
You were right to bring it there, as an edit war was developing. But we should have been able to leave ourselves more of a choice. Just a reminder to think about how you can resolves things like this better next time. Daniel Case 03:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for helping revert Allie DiMeco for me. It gets tough sometimes. :P Signed by Tommy ( Talk/ Contribs) 04:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
You recently deleted multiple shows on the List of Disney Channel series, and you added the comment that Arwin! was cancelled. First off, please provide a source that states this. If no source can be provided, then this a rumor and Arwin! should remain on the list. Second off, you removed the entire sectino for 2008, including 3 shows. Please be careful when you make edits. For more discussion on the topic of Arwin! being cancelled, please see Talk:Arwin! (TV series) -- Pilotboi / talk / contribs 23:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you recently made a reversion on this article. Part of what you reverted, though, was correct. That's So Raven ended in Febuary 2007 and no new episodes are scheduled. So the list can be changed to reflect this. Please let me know if you feel that is incorrect, otherwise I'll assume you'll fix it. -- Pilotboi / talk / contribs 04:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I have added the not a ballot template to the AFD. This is because many single purpose accounts may comment if this discussion reaches the Simtropolis forums - something which appeared to happen in previous AFD's of this article. Camaron1 | Chris 20:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
As expected: [3] Camaron1 | Chris 10:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
I think you could have at least talked about perging the two Suite Life DVD articles before actually doing so. -- Pilotboi / talk / contribs 19:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
PHINEAS AND FERB IS CONFRIMED LEAVE IT ON THE DCOS PAGE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs)
"For all we know the show could've bombed with todays preview and never see the light of day again" who cares if it never airs again! it still was shown, and that still makes it an original series...and sorry im not on here 24/7 to learn how to operate things, who cares if i dont sign...when i do the episode thing i copy and paste the other "episode" info from another one and put it in there so i dont screw it up if you havent noticed as well everything people complained about here ended up being right! TO PHINEAS AND FERB! HAHAHA! NOW YOU LEAVE IT THERE!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs)
But March is Winter, spring begins Late March early April - yankeesrj12 Userpage
I Just changed it back to the way it was, someone else changed it completely, i put it back to normal - yankeesrj12 userpage
i figured someone would think that...someone deleted all of the original movies (86-96 or w/e it was) and i fixed it all back up, and i accept the appology —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yankeesrj12 ( talk • contribs) 03:18, August 20, 2007 (UTC).
You removed my addition to the article, saying it wasn't menitoned on the page. It appears in "Act Four: My Other Dog's a German Shepherd." Unfortunately, the page doesn't say which TV show he is referring to, but if you listen to the recording offered on the page, he says it (it is a radio show, after all). If you don't want to pay the 95 cents to find out, look at the numerous references to it that I didn't cite because they aren't quite reliable sources: [4], [5], [6]. Unfortunately reliable sources are not always free. This should be included in the article because it offers an adult perspective on the show, by somebody whose job is relevant here (as a love/sex columnist). I don't think that WP:V requires that sources be in print (meaning, I think broadcasts can be cited), nor that they be free, although of course such a source would be preferred. By the way, I appreciate that the page gets a lot of vandalism and you're just trying to prevent more, but I do think this is verifiable and notable. Rigadoun (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not undo other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Bleach (manga), or you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the 3RR. Thank you. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I am quite familiar with 3RR rule. Please use talk instead of disruptive revert warring in mainspace. Thank you, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Regarding this, the user had asked me to do it :-) Happy editing! -- Boricu æ ddie 20:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
When you did a revert to an earlier version of the TSL article, unfortunately it re-introduced some vandalism in the process. I fixed it. WAVY 10 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
I thought I did provide a fair use rationale. What's wrong with the one I wrote?
-- JoBrLa 18:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Something Wicca This Way Comes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Wicca This Way Comes. Thank you. Pixelface ( talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I've Got You Under My Skin (Charmed episode). Thank you. Pixelface ( talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Thank You for Not Morphing, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thank You for Not Morphing. Thank you. Pixelface ( talk) 19:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
I appreciate your enthusiasm in clearing copyvios off Wikipedia, [7], but it would help if you do look at the page history before suggesting it be deleted. As per our policy on copy violations, we do not delete the entire article off the face of wikipedia, we only delete the copy violations. Due to the ever changing nature of Wikipedia, copy violations may be added at some point of time by an anon. It would be counter productive to delete an article just because one version was a copyvio. In the future, please do check an article history before declaring it to be a speedy. Thanks! =Nichalp «Talk»= 08:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
The category should be deleted since you've already nominated the templates, correct? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 06:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
if u watch Disney channel or read magazines the you will be able to confirm the movie. It has been confirmed many times, so it needs to be on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setnick ( talk • contribs) 03:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Cheers from Canada! ;-) -- Rob NS 01:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Idontknow 610 TM 19:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:FullmetalFantasy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Malevious. An image of yours that was uploaded to Commons is under consideration for deletion. Please feel free to view the discussion and comment on the proposal. The image is commons:File:Tree of Life close up.jpg, and the deletion discussion is at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Tree of Life (Disney). Thank you. Powers T 00:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is International Black Belt Federation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Black Belt Federation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:03, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
User:Malevious/Carey Martin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Malevious/Carey Martin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Malevious/Carey Martin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)