Hi, Major Lyte. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Roundmaster ( talk) 12:48, 31 July 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Roundmaster:, Thank you so much I have decided to stay.

Major Lyte ( talk) 17:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm TheAwesomeHwyh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to American Civil War—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheAwesome Hwyh 16:08, 17 January 2020 (UTC) reply

I have reverted several of the edits that you have made in the last few days, because they did not appear to be improvements. In particular, please note:

• Do not change spellings to US English spelling except with the guidelines in MOS:ENGVAR. In particular, articles that mainly relate to Nigeria should normally use Nigerian English spelling. My understanding is that Commonwealth English spelling is normally used in Nigeria, including 'programmes' and 'honours'.
• The date formats to use are described in MOS:DATEFORMAT. '17 January, 2020' is not a supported format.

Verbcatcher ( talk) 21:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Please stop introducing non-standard date formats that do not follow MOS:DATEFORMAT. Also, the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy does not prevent descriptions that favour the subject of an article if the description is justified by well-sourced content. Lastly, please only use '#1Lib1Ref' in edit summaries when your edits relate to the #1Lib1Ref campaign to add references to Wikipedia. Thanks, Verbcatcher ( talk) 19:24, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Acknowledged Major Lyte ( talk) 22:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Nigerian bloggers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Alexf ^(talk) 16:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Millennium Campus Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Millennium Campus Network (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Please don't write "#WPWP #WPWPUIL" as edit summaries, instead please explain what your edit is doing. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Please explain "Adding image of band" instead of only using the hashtag. Also you're unnecessarily removing hatnotes and cleanup templates. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:26, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

You're still not using edit summaries. Please write "Adding image (#WPWP)" instead of just using bare hashtags. What is "WPWPUIL" referring to? – Thjarkur (talk) 10:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Please use the Preview button to see if your changes work before submitting them. This edit and other similar are leaving broken templates. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

I repeat what I said, you are clearly not looking over the page after you hit submit to check whether everything looks correct. Please revert the broken template here. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

I've come here with a similar issue. This edit of yours removed the tags as well as adding an image. Tacyarg ( talk) 18:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ogasawarana microtheca, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 ( talk) 20:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mufaddal Saifuddin, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 ( talk) 20:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miriam Were. Dl2000 ( talk) 20:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi,

I am EMsmile, and I am a part of a group of people wishing to improve SDG-related articles on Wikipedia (see here on Meta). We are organising this online SDG edit-a-thon during Global Goals Week, 19-26 September 2020. Please take part in it! If you have any questions about this work, please feel free to ask your question on the event's talk page here. EMsmile ( talk) 14:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Good day EMsmile,

I will always reach out to you once I need your assistance.

Best regards. Major Lyte ( talk) 15:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Ifeyinwa Ighodola, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VAXIDICAE💉 17:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a " soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Deb ( talk) 18:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ubong King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal Government College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions.

Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC) reply

I wiki linked the article (Federal Government College) on Ubing King's page. I didn't create any disambiguate link.

Major Lyte ( talk) 07:39, 11 April 2021 (WAT)

An article you recently created, Olasupo "Opeyemi" Abideen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TAXIDICAE💰 12:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Please make sure to include proper captions when adding images, and use the proper syntax when adding images in infoboxes. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 10:59, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

To add, all this is explained in the campaign rules m:Wikipedia_Pages_Wanting_Photos_2021#How_to_participate rule 4 says "include a brief caption explaining what the image depicts in the article" A bit less haste to add images will greatly increase the quality of the edits which is more important than the quantity. More images being correctly used is great but you need to do the work to explain the context too. Please make sure images are relevant, this edit wasn't very helpful imo especially in the infobox. Nthep ( talk) 12:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Please note also that WikiProject Middle-earth does not use fan art in infoboxes or the lead sections of articles. If a major artist gives us a free high-quality image, then of course we can use that. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 08:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Dear Nthep,

Apologies, I just saw this notification and I have made corrections.

I wish to still participant in this year's WPWP Contest!

Thanks in anticipation.

Kind regards!

Major Lyte ( talk) 15:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

The majority of your edits are helping but by the campaign rules you are supposed to a) check that images are actually relevant, b) add captions , and c) use the correct syntax. You haven't been doing any of b) and c) and a) you have added some (a minority I give you) that are irrelevant or marginal relevance. All of that means that others have to go through all the edits you make and clean them up.

I accept that various tools may be suggesting images to add but it is your responsibility to assess whether the images are relevant to the article, Wikipedia:IMGCONTENT might help you make this assessment. Nthep ( talk) 16:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello Nthep,

I have gone through Wikipedia:IMGCONTENT

Can I continue in the campaign?

I'm just asking to abide by Wikipedia policy and add appropriate images with meaningful captions and titles using the appropriate syntax. I'd rather see 21 correctly added images than 218 (your count today so far) that partially or wholly miss the mark. I have nothing to do with the administration of the WPWP campaign and I don't intend to make any comment to the organisers about your edits, so continue to add images but please, please add captions/title and use the right syntax when you add to an infobox. Nthep ( talk) 16:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC) reply

I don't recall the issue, but William McFarland and George M. Beebe appear to have the same image. BrineStans ( talk) 20:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello BrineStans

I didn't notice that. Apologies Major Lyte ( talk) 06:27, 6 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Promotional entry on a non-/borderline-notable person, with some statements unsupported by citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Olasupo Opeyemi Abideen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Olasupo Opeyemi Abideen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Please stop adding "image of" to captions. It does not improve matters -- a caption is inherently assumed to be describing or discussing the content of the image. Also, an infobox person image does not need a name, as it is implied that it is the person whose name is at the top of the infobox. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 10:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello Nat Gertler,

Your request will adhere to

Kind regards Major Lyte ( talk) 10:33, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you!

(Please consider going back and undoing the additions that you already have done.)

-- Nat Gertler ( talk) 10:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harmony FM FRCN, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC) reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello Major Lyte,Kindly keep on with the good work you are doing. Your effort will not be in vain.. Joris Darlington Quarshie ( talk) 18:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Harmony FM FRCN".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olumide Idowu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 20:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manir Dan Iya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Democratic Party.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Olumide Idowu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Action Against Trafficking in Persons and Smuggling of Migrants in Nigeria (A-TIPSOM), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 ( talk) 16:00, 29 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Action Against Trafficking in Persons and Smuggling of Migrants in Nigeria (A-TIPSOM) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram ( talk) 16:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Action Against Trafficking in Persons and Smuggling of Migrants in Nigeria, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 20:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much GeoffreyT2000 Major Lyte ( talk) 20:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ezekiel Temitope Olaleye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ezekiel Temitope Olaleye, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 12:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC) reply

....I have moved your article Draft:Instruments of Africa to draft. It is improperly sourced. Best, R E A D I N G ^{Talk to the Beans?} 01:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much, I would add more references to support the article. Major Lyte ( talk) 07:46, 7 July 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Maryben Omollo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olawale Ayilara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olawale Ayilara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reading Beans ( talk) 09:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Makayla Malaka. Thanks! Reading Beans ( talk) 10:04, 7 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidEfraim was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maryben Omollo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidEfraim ( talk) 11:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Makayla Malaka instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please compare article and draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Makayla Malaka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 07:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi, unfortunately your addition of stub tags is incorrect as stubs are short articles of only one or two short paragraphs. Please remove the tags from the longer articles, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 23:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ezekiel Temitope Olaleye".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 12:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Maryben Omollo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 02:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ibrahim Yekini. Thanks! Jamiebuba ( talk) 10:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ibrahim Yekini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba ( talk) 10:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Jamiebuba, Thank you for bringing my attention to that.

I have updated the reference.

Thank you Major Lyte ( talk) 11:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Major Lyte was:

The reference has been update

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ibrahim Yekini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Major Lyte ( talk) 11:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ibrahim Yekini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 16:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ibrahim Yekini, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 17:06, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Major Lyte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ibrahim Yekini".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply