This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Thanks, Jetstreamer! WhisperToMe ( talk) 23:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Brunoptsem (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Dear Jetstreamer, thanks for your kind wishes and for another year of wikipartnership. Let's keep in touch in 2013! Un gran abrazo, Bruno ( Brunoptsem ( talk) 17:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC))
Hi Jetstreamer.
I need to have someone blocked from editing a page. A user by the name of DONALDderosa keeps removing information on the Allegiant Air page under the fleet section. The last sentence of the last paragraph on that page keeps getting removed when I clearly added a reference and removes it for no apparent reason. I need some help administrating this page. I need protection before this gets out of hand.-- Triple A ( talk) 23:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkish Airlines destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinop ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I notice that you undid my edit removing the section concerning Rafic Hariri and corruption. But I did so becuase the cited sources in no way supported the paragraf. In fact, they contradict it! The Independent article said that "No one is accusing Mr Hariri of anything... the Prime Minister was so rich that nobody stood a chance of bribing him". The Nation article does critisize Hariri, but does not level the accusations in the paragraph.
That's why I removed it. It's compleltly unsourced, and increadibly not NPOV. Do you now think I should remove it again? 81.129.211.200 ( talk) 21:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) ( talk) 15:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edit of the Kenya Airways fleet page is quite amusing & misguided. In 2011, KQ signed an agreement to acquire two 77W's through a 12 year leasing deal with GECAS. The first aircraft will be delivered in October of 2013 and the second in the 1st quarter of 2014. In April of 2012 when KQ signed the mega deal with GE to acquire 19 engines for the 9 787's GE engines, the CEO also mentioned the two leased 77W's which will also be powered by GE engines. Search: "Kenya Airways in $380 million deal for Dreamliner's engines" on YouTube and hear the KQ CEO talk about the two 77W's.
The latest press release (2012) which you quoted which states Kenya Airways has one 773 on order is the one being financed and to be fully owned by KQ through Afreximbank after the recent cash call. In actuality, KQ has THREE 77W's on order. The reason why all the orders are not in a composite press release is because the leasing of the GECAS aircraft is done through an offshore leasing company in a Tax haven region. The current four 772's were acquired in the same manner.
I wont change your edit, but I'll be back in October when the first of the two leased aircrafts are delivered and you can explain how a 773 order was fulfilled in less than a year.
Happy New Year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magellanmax ( talk • contribs) 03:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt reply
I have been updating the Manchester Airport Page for some 7 hours today making sure all linked articles return to the Manchester Airport home page correctly and removing many broken links and cancelled routes.
I have now added the references and short note - Initially as a seasonal flight showing in the Ryanair booking engine. It may be year round but don't know at the moment.
Regards
Rutankrd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rutankrd ( talk • contribs) 22:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Link to Manchester Airports own new services page
http://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/manweb.nsf/Content/NewRoutes
Regards
rutankrd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rutankrd ( talk • contribs) 23:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! About this edit of West Caribbean Airways that page was an archive of the page of the company official website. The URL wca.com.co was that of West Caribbean WhisperToMe ( talk) 07:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Id like to advise I have re-added Monarch Airlines routes that are currently operated from this airport, I don't understand to why you have removed them as these routes are 100% in operation and can be found selling on monarch.co.uk.
I have also re done my revision for the route Leeds Bradford Airport to Faro which is a route that will begin and currently being sold on monarch.co.uk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 19:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello you keep removing my edits when in fact I am correct in my edits, the routes will be operating and can be seen on <monarch.co.uk> please check out the routes and allow my changes to be made to ensure Wikipedia is kept up to date and 100% correct and reliable.
Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
What should I do then? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
My source is Monarch.co.uk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I give up, ha thanks anyhows, however you will see the route added within the next couple of months! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
People continue to add airlineroute.net as a source for Korean Air but that source cannot be used as it is not considered reliable. Thanks! 71.91.69.220 ( talk) 05:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I've replied at Talk:PLUNA. -- RFBailey ( talk) 00:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
That is normal to repeat images of Turkish airlines aircrafts. In wiki commons category of airport is upload only 30/35 photos and 10/15 of them are of Turkish airlines. And I think it is nice to have pictures on Airlines and destinations category.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air Algérie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air Mali ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Hello. Can you please move my recently-created article Air Algérie Cargo Flight 2208 to Air Algérie Flight 2208. I cannot do it on my own because the latter page already exists, yet it's a redirect. Moreover, I made a mistake when moving the article from my sandbox, and mistakenly created User:Air Algérie Flight 2208. Can you please delete it as well?. Thanks.-- Jetstreamer Talk 15:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jetstreamer.
Sorry to bother you about Ethiopian Airlines again. I was wondering about a couple references that would be deemed acceptable, or unreliable to you. 1. I was looking on this website and say they have 9 Bombardier Q400s in the fleet and that the rest have been delivered to ASKY Airlines. So I was thinking that you should remove the order of Q400s that still appears under order. 2. I found an article stating ET's intentions to operate two of their Boeing 777-300ERs to both D.C, and Guangzhou. I looked for several articles seeing if ET ordered, or leased two Boeing 777-300ERs, but couldn't find any but the one listed above. 3. I have been hearing ET will be starting service to Madrid, Sao Paulo, and Rio de Janerio. I have found some references, but would like to see if you would see these as a reliable source to you.
-- Triple A ( talk) 18:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Just after I added Tallinn and Vilnius and revised Kuala Lumpur lines, I tried to add the references, but I was unable to do so. For some reason, I can see only limited number of references (until the one about Entebbe) and I could not add the new ones.
My references were http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/18/tk-dackul-jun13/ and http://www.airporthaber.com/havacilik-haberleri/thyden-baskentler-atagi.html by the way.
Regards, Engin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.193.30 ( talk) 15:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello again Jetstreamer,
I tried to add references many times on Turkish Airlines Destinations page, but cannot do so.
This is the official announcement regarding the initiation of Libreville service on January 31, 2013: http://www.turkishairlines.com/tr-tr/kurumsal/haberler/17318/yeni-ucuslarimiz-libreville
There is no official announcement yet, but a number of websites contain the following news. Kuala Lumpur service resumes on April 25, 2013: http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/18/tk-dackul-jun13/ Tallinn and Vilnius service begins on June 11, 2013: http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/18/tk-tllvno-jun13/
I cannot add these links to the References part.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.193.30 ( talk) 08:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Airlines for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 19:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Mariscal Sucre International Airport .
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.
If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.
Continued edit warring on Mariscal Sucre International Airport or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AR New Image 737-700.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC 04:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 ( talk) 04:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Jetstreamer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is just surprising. I suspect I've been blocked by the admin above because I've reported an IP user that has been acting in bad faith, ignoring all the messages left in their talk page, and the one that gets a block is me. Apart from that, I've never broken WP:3RR. Can you please give me a resonable explanation? Of course, I intend my block to be thoroughly reconsidered. As per my contributions, you can see that I've never acted in bad faith. How does this continue? Thanks.-- Jetstreamer Talk 1:23 pm, Today (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
This block should not be surprising: an appropriate warning was provided. Having reviewed the series of edits, it is clear that the block - however unfortunate it may be - was a temporary fix, as per blocking policy. There is no doubt that you edit this project in good faith, however, that does not absolve anyone from following dispute resolution processes instead of breaking key policies. Moreover, the guide to appealing blocks is quite clear that in order to be unblocked, the editor must show understanding of why they are blocked. Nowhere in this request nor in the discussion below is any such understanding apparent. Instead, there's nothing but argument and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT even when the rules and policies have been laid out clearly. As such, the block is valid, but there's nothing GAB-compliant about the request ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
In regard to the matter above, can an administrator block a user preemptively? If so, what about WP:AGF? I'm deeply concerned about this situation.-- Jetstreamer Talk 14:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Comment from blocking admin: Perhaps you should read the wikipedia page on WP:EW. It doesn't appear that you understand it.
I'm also concerned about your assertion that the IP you were edit warring with, 203.160.61.186 ( talk · contribs), was acting in bad faith. It's clear that the editor was adding unsourced info and edit warring as well, but I find it more than a stretch to say it is bad-faith editing. If I had any evidence of bad-faith editing, that IP would be blocked for a year or longer given the recent block. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
{{
unblock}}
template together. Someone will look at your unblock request.
Toddst1 (
talk) 16:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Well, that's a bit discouraging, as my unblock only depends upon your decision.-- Jetstreamer Talk 19:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
I saw your entry on the Nigeria Airways Flight 2120 history log, and wanted to let you know that I found the proper references regarding the names of the flight crew members. One reference is from the Internet Movie Database entry about the episode of the 'Mayday' TV series Under Pressure. The other is from a web site dealing with the history of Nationair. The names of William Allan and Kent Davidge can be found on the IMDB page, while Victor Fehr's name is on the Nationair history page. I hope this helps. And003 ( talk) 09:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ethiopian Airlines. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. All the information you have removed has been added again, as per I have thoroughly researched everything and provided references. If this continues, I will take evasive action and report you to the administrator and have you blocked again. This is your first and last official warning.-- KevinMichaelBradley1996 ( talk) 19:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
User:Jetstreamer has been vandalizing my edits as well. I second the need for administrator intervention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:BC86:1:222:19FF:FEF3:BC0A ( talk) 21:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Good call on identifying
User talk:KevinMichaelBradley1996 (
talk ·
contribs) as a sockpuppet. Let me know if there are
continuing problems with the master others show up. I've identified an ipsock of that editor that you've also had interaction with.
Toddst1 (
talk) 18:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
The diff provided above includes just one minor edit from him/her, actually the latest made to the article, but it also includes another three ones made by the blocked user. Basically, I'm proposing to take the article to the latest clean version prior to these three edits of the blocked user. Given that that latest version is the one I contributed to, I'm asking for advice.-- Jetstreamer Talk 14:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
hi my friend. I have a problem. Could you help to me? I'm preparing destination map for LTBA but I cannot use north america relief map. When I write like this I cannot see anything.
but When I write like this I can see location map of North America. So How can I use North American relief map. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Location_map_North_America) -- Mertborak ( talk) 16:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this page? A user continues to insist that Hainan Airlines's Chicago service will be operated on a seasonal basis when it begins service on 3 September 2013 but the reference provided doesn't mention the service being seasonal and also they have been adding sister airports but I don't think it is notable to be listed. It is reverted for now. Thanks! Snoozlepet ( talk) 01:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
On 4 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Air Algérie Flight 2208, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an Algerian cargo aircraft crashed near a highly populated area of Northern Italy but killed only the three crew members on board? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Air Algérie Flight 2208. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jetstreamer - it's not easy to find a direct reference that indicates that Luke Hurley's song is about the Erebus Disaster, but the lyrics make it blindingly obvious, and I've talked with him about the song on several occasions. Hopefully a link the lyrics is close enough... Grutness... wha? 23:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jetstreamer! Recently, 2 editors have added Ethiopian Airlines to Ninoy Aquino International Airport as they are "planning" to start service to Manila on June 18, 2013 but are still citing airlineroute.net (which is NOT considered reliable) I had to revert them. Can you keep an eye on it? I had to remove the entry at Addis Ababa Bole International Airport as well. Thanks! Snoozlepet ( talk) 04:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikiwings | ||
In recognition of your 20000 edits mainly concerned with improving aviation articles. MilborneOne ( talk) 18:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aeroflot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farnborough ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Hello Wikipedians! I'd like to know if edits like this one were appropriate. I've seen throughout many articles that a bot has been removing all the interwiki links ( [1], [2], [3], and so on). Some days ago, I've warned a user who removed all these links from many articles and I restored them, but it seems I shouln't had done so. Thanks in advance! -- Jetstreamer Talk 13:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Good day Please note the websites which are the source for destination : Constanta http://www.turkishairlines.com/en-int/constanta/city-guide/flights-tickets-online-booking http://wire.seenews.com/news/turkish-airlines-to-fly-from-istanbul-to-romanias-constanta-336227 And many others, in romanian language, and on the wikipedia page for Mihail Kogalniceanu airport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.12.168.225 ( talk) 13:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
addition to Constanta routes : Mihail Kogalniceanu airport website: http://www.mk-airport.ro/indexen.php under the tab destionations It is accessible for reservation under THY website(online) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.12.168.225 ( talk) 14:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I found a source for ET's service to Manila and Seoul ( http://www.ethiosports.com/2013/02/10/ethiopian-airlines-expands-asian-network/) but I don't know if this source is reliable or not. Thanks! Snoozlepet ( talk) 21:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Someone keeps removing Ethiopian Airlines from that page where as there is a source for that. Can you take a look? 68.119.73.36 ( talk) 23:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
EAA had FIVE Super VC10s. The Flight archive is wrong or not updated for 1969, but IS CORRECT for the World Airline Survey in 1970. See http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1970/1970%20-%200531.html 5X-UVA, 5H-MMT, 5Y-ADA were the first 3. 5X-UVJ followed in 1969. The final VC10 was 5H-MOG which was delivered in 1970. 5X-UVA was lost at Addis Ababa in April 1972. The other 4 were repossessed by BAC when EAA collapsed in the late 1970s and were converted to aerial refuellers and re-delivered to the RAF as K3 tankers. They still fly to this day. I flew on them all.
86.154.18.161 ( talk) 18:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
The article as it stands implies that EAA only operated four Super VC10s. This is just plain wrong and someone needs to sort it out. 86.154.18.161 ( talk) 19:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I believe that the source is genuine. It was a short-lived KLM route 151/152 that stopped at Manchester Airport on its way to Dublin from Amsterdam. It's on table 10C of the timetable, so please revert it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacktheladz ( talk • contribs) 18:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you know if that flight is a pure Air Seychelles flight or is Air Seychelles wet leasing an Etihad plane to fly the route. Someone keeps making that flight "Air Seychelles operated by Etihad Airways" at the Abu Dhabi AIrport page. 68.119.73.36 ( talk) 22:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
check the page. that is OK? :) but the direct links to Burgas Airport page with all flights timetable is not work. How to put the correct links ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lzdimitar ( talk • contribs)
I understand but the information for charters flights have only in airport website. All this information is correct but there is no where to put official resources. The same applies and to Varna Airport. From 3 years always'm adding accurate and correct information on Burgas, Varna and Sofia airports and also can easily check that. Tell your opinion how to add that information please.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lzdimitar ( talk • contribs)
Hi again ! Check Varna and Burgas airports pages. That is good ? Regards :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lzdimitar ( talk • contribs)
Hi Jetstreamer, I noticed that in early January 2013, you put a refimprove template on the top of Berlin Brandenburg Airport. In the meantime, quite a lot been has changed there. I think that by now, the article as a whole has a sufficient number of reliable sources (this might not be true for a few isolated sections). Do you have a different opinion? As always, I'd appreciate any thoughts and comments. Best regards -- FoxyOrange ( talk) 21:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
I can see quite a few USSR era destinations in that list. inspector ( talk) 22:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jetstreamer, I am asking for your help with a new article I am starting called Flybe Ireland link here -> [5]. It is a new deviation of the airline being in October 2013 at Dublin and Cork. This is the only reference I can fined so fear. I need to fined more information about the airline. If you can help me with the article I would greatly appreciate it . Thank you. Myland1111 ( talk) 15:51, 12 February 2013 (GMT)
Please see that Orbest was an airline. So I have modified article Lanzarote airport as the airline is not operating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerard.edo ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
On 12 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2013 Compagnie Africaine d'Aviation crash, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the accident of a Congolese aircraft in March 2013 involved no fatalities on the ground, despite crashing in the middle of a city? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Compagnie Africaine d'Aviation crash. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Over at the Wikiproject Aviation/Aviation accident task force page [7]. You were chosen by myself because of your past work or input on aviation crash articles. Thank you for the help. ...William 11:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
"Pilot error (sometimes called cockpit error) occurs when the pilot is considered to be principally or partially responsible for an aircraft accident."
As stated in the article itself, Ethiopian Airlines disputes the conclusion of the final report released by the Lebanese Civil Aviation Authority. Please explain why you are insisting the Type be "Pilot Error."
Do read http://www.flyethiopian.com/en/docs/downloads/ET409Inv/3_Part_II_Appended_to_the_Final_Report.pdf before reverting edit of "Disputed" to "Pilot error" (I will revert back your edit if I don't have reply from you). If you still further insist that the conclusions of Lebanese Civil Aviation Authority should be taken as facts, then you are going to have to present your point as to why you believe so. Please respond, or I will go ahead and re-correct the entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 18:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
EAL, according to the criteria, can be considered a reliable source. The information they published is verifiable. While you are considering the context of EAL's refutation to make a judgement about reliability and verifiability (actually, probably truth too), you are disregarding the fact that LCAA also has an invested interest in this context. "The airline's press release you're citing does not provide a valid cause, it just denies the official investigation." True EAL's official refutation does not supply cause for the crash. It, with substantiated arguments, disputes LCAA's conclusion. "I'm afraid that's not enough information to say pilot error was not the cause." This is true, and on the flip side, nor does LCAA's conclusion suffice as "the truth." This is exactly my point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 22:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
What is an "official report"? LCAA conducted their investigation and arrived at a conclusion. It is LCAA's conclusion. EAL counters and disputes the conclusions. This is what we know. When "Pilot error" is listed in the box, it misleads readers giving the false impression that there is some sort of consensus. What is written already clearly indicates dispute, so what reason is there to see it as wrong to change "Pilot error" to "Disputed"? Further expansion and elaboration is, although an improvement, secondary to the discussion at hand. Under the circumstances, if you have a different/better resolution, I am interested to know. Until then, I'll go ahead and revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 23:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm asking in case I am missing something. Flight 409 crashed into Lebanese waters, but I do not at all see how this translates to LCAA's conclusions being end all be all. It seems their report is simply their stance on the matter ie their point of view. If you agree so far (as far as the purposes of Wikipedia are concerned) I hope you'll be there to revert back to "Disputed" when someone else edits it back then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 00:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Sounds good. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 00:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
And you can see masses of unreferenced material in this article - set about adding the missing information, instead of being overly critical. RuthAS ( talk) 20:33, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
You've asked source about discontinued Eskişehir flights.. Well, I do not have any source, since the airline is escaping from any such announcement, but you may try to buy a ticket to Eskişehir and see that there is no flight. Actually, they transferred the flights to Eskişehir to nearby Zafer Airport, which was opened in the last quarter of 2012. Afterwards, they cancelled both İstanbul and Brussels flights from Eskişehir.
Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.193.30 ( talk) 12:40, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if an airline article should have a source for each seating config, especially for one going for GA. I am looking at United Airlines and none of the configs are sourced. I can source them all (they are not on the same page), but would it be an overkill? Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 00:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Finally got back to this one. What do you think about an extra column for the ref like this on on my Sandbox page, it does need finishing but you get the idea. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 19:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Revolution1221 ( talk) 15:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Template:Refimprove article tagging should be used ONLY if there are MAJOR , OBVIOUS distortions of Main parts of the article, when inline tags are not enough.
You often tag the whole article without any clear thoughts seen.
Article tagging is NOT the purpose of Wikipedia.
Try to think and express your thoughts DETAILED. Only this will help: don't WP:POINT or WP:DISRUPT readers. Inline tags are BEST and help to improve.
For other or general criticism the article talk is best. Tagremover ( talk) 19:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
The user above and me have been into an argument regarding the discussion above. I see the user removing the {{ refimprove}} from lots of articles I've tagged, something pretty clear from their username. What to do? I often tag articles that are in need of more sourcing, as it's the standard, while s(he) insists on using {{ cn}} instead, which I found to be tag bombing. Thanks in advance for any comments.-- Jetstreamer Talk 01:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The Citation Needed template contains the following information in its documentation:
This template is intended for specific passages that need citation. For entire articles or sections that contain significant material lacking sources (rather than just specific short passages), there are other, more appropriate templates, such as {{ Unreferenced}} or {{ Refimprove}}.
So I agree with you that covering the article with Citation Needed templates is not best practices. -- Dianna ( talk) 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, First of all, i'm not familiar with wiki editions. I hope i didn't create any panic. I don't want any vandalism, for sure.. :) Regarding TK destination page, I've tried to remove all extra references and replace with TK's official timetable issued on 5th of April. I thought no more reference needed anymore. In this regard, besides removing the old references, i've also added Gassim and Isparta destinations; I've indicated the suspended flights of Aleppo, Damascus and Sinop. Removed the cargo reference of Paris-CDG. I think that's all what i've changed yesterday.. Any suggestion, rejection and objection will be highly appreciated, of course.. Thanks & Kind Regards.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ushuaia1 ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am just wondering what you think about this please? I am just a little sick of people flooding article with images. I like the way Kenya Airways is with a minimal amount of images. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 10:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
The citation I included for the Comet 4 information was included in my edit and was from here - http://www.aussieairliners.org/dh%20comet/austcometregister.htm.
The 747SP and 747-300 information was from here - http://www.aussieairliners.org/b-747/aust747index.html
The 767 information was from here http://www.aussieairliners.org/b-767/767australia.htm
I am happy to add in the citations for these if you like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trentles ( talk • contribs) 12:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi
I thought the fact that I am a pilot with the company, albeit a senior pilot, will be enough grounds for the changes to be factual.
Currently 4x E135's are operated. 2x B735's are no longer in service. V5NDI has been ferried to the UK; and V5TNP is awaiting spares in Johannesburg, in order for the ferry flight to take place.
FYI: http://www.airnamibia.com.na/fleet
41.182.93.17 ( talk) 16:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Regards tbl
There is wrong data about the flight detail of Turkish Airlines and I just tried to correct that which is Kuala-Lumpur flights. There wrights "resumes" and it has to be changed with "begins" this is all. I follow Turkish Airlines everyday even my office is just nearby Ataturk Airport. I can see the runway,parked planes,take offs and if they change the runways rarely landings. There are so many things to correct but Wikipedia do not let me correct the mistakes or add missing parts. For example cargo flight of MAS or Korean or 3 times a week I see the planes of Iberia which they resumed like that. What do I have to do to sort these corrections out and add the missing details.
Best regards,
Rifat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.238.127.230 ( talk) 08:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
You removed a phrase I added in the lead section, explaining there that... this "adition" does not belong in the lead section. Well, some downright stupidities, though, it seems belong there, in your opinion. Anyway, I still wonder why it is ok to keep in that very lead section the fact that official soviet casualty count was disputed (w/o a hint to any verifiable source or reference) and the truism that the "cancers are still being accounted for", but not a detail that clarify the fact that beyond any dispute, and beyond any statistic made today or in the future, there is already KNOWN the fact that any increase in cancer rates, if detectable, shall be small. BTW, suggesting that one of the effects of radiation spread by the accident is having "deformities" in humans (or animals) is downright false and stupid, at least according to the source I already cited in support of the claims you hurried to remove:
So when we put these Chernobyl-related doses in context, it is reasonably clear that a large increase in cancers is unlikely. […] Despite these strong scientific data, stories in newspapers, magazines, and even books continue to describe children with birth defects supposedly from Chernobyl and, in one instance, a three-headed cow. These claims have no basis in fact.
Not even the more- and heavier-exposed survivers of the a-bombs in hiroshima and nagasaky had frequently such "deformities", and the explanation for that fact is quite simple. So, simply removing a pertinent elucidation supported by verifiable and reliable sources, that tried only to remove the doubts a more-than-imperfect phrasing slyly suggest, you seem pretty much biased. Can`t you try to contribute more - and more often - in ADDING details substantiated with verifiable and reliable sources, than "contributing" here by removing the contributions of the others, my dear "jetstreamer"? Remus Octavian Mocanu ( talk) 04:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I just reverted your edit to the Aeroflot Flight 593 page because I wanted to clarify that this addition was in fact just a translation based on the primary source (The Youtube video linked). Which is why it should be a part of the article.
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 10:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
P.S. No need for Talkbacks. I'm watching your talk page right now. Also, if need be, linking my username works just as well (Thanks to the new notifications) TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 10:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Cool, that's good for me. I have a concern regarding the name of the unidentified pilot. Is there any source for that? Is tha stuff included in the video?-- Jetstreamer Talk 10:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
HEllo Jetstreamer the 737-800 CN-RGN has an 50th aircraft logo on the side. Royal Air Maroc say this on her facebook page. And shown pictures of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.80.188.105 ( talk) 11:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Thanks, Jetstreamer! WhisperToMe ( talk) 23:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Brunoptsem (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Dear Jetstreamer, thanks for your kind wishes and for another year of wikipartnership. Let's keep in touch in 2013! Un gran abrazo, Bruno ( Brunoptsem ( talk) 17:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC))
Hi Jetstreamer.
I need to have someone blocked from editing a page. A user by the name of DONALDderosa keeps removing information on the Allegiant Air page under the fleet section. The last sentence of the last paragraph on that page keeps getting removed when I clearly added a reference and removes it for no apparent reason. I need some help administrating this page. I need protection before this gets out of hand.-- Triple A ( talk) 23:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turkish Airlines destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinop ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:10, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
I notice that you undid my edit removing the section concerning Rafic Hariri and corruption. But I did so becuase the cited sources in no way supported the paragraf. In fact, they contradict it! The Independent article said that "No one is accusing Mr Hariri of anything... the Prime Minister was so rich that nobody stood a chance of bribing him". The Nation article does critisize Hariri, but does not level the accusations in the paragraph.
That's why I removed it. It's compleltly unsourced, and increadibly not NPOV. Do you now think I should remove it again? 81.129.211.200 ( talk) 21:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
አቤል ዳዊት (Janweh) ( talk) 15:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edit of the Kenya Airways fleet page is quite amusing & misguided. In 2011, KQ signed an agreement to acquire two 77W's through a 12 year leasing deal with GECAS. The first aircraft will be delivered in October of 2013 and the second in the 1st quarter of 2014. In April of 2012 when KQ signed the mega deal with GE to acquire 19 engines for the 9 787's GE engines, the CEO also mentioned the two leased 77W's which will also be powered by GE engines. Search: "Kenya Airways in $380 million deal for Dreamliner's engines" on YouTube and hear the KQ CEO talk about the two 77W's.
The latest press release (2012) which you quoted which states Kenya Airways has one 773 on order is the one being financed and to be fully owned by KQ through Afreximbank after the recent cash call. In actuality, KQ has THREE 77W's on order. The reason why all the orders are not in a composite press release is because the leasing of the GECAS aircraft is done through an offshore leasing company in a Tax haven region. The current four 772's were acquired in the same manner.
I wont change your edit, but I'll be back in October when the first of the two leased aircrafts are delivered and you can explain how a 773 order was fulfilled in less than a year.
Happy New Year! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magellanmax ( talk • contribs) 03:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt reply
I have been updating the Manchester Airport Page for some 7 hours today making sure all linked articles return to the Manchester Airport home page correctly and removing many broken links and cancelled routes.
I have now added the references and short note - Initially as a seasonal flight showing in the Ryanair booking engine. It may be year round but don't know at the moment.
Regards
Rutankrd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rutankrd ( talk • contribs) 22:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Link to Manchester Airports own new services page
http://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/manweb.nsf/Content/NewRoutes
Regards
rutankrd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rutankrd ( talk • contribs) 23:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi! About this edit of West Caribbean Airways that page was an archive of the page of the company official website. The URL wca.com.co was that of West Caribbean WhisperToMe ( talk) 07:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Id like to advise I have re-added Monarch Airlines routes that are currently operated from this airport, I don't understand to why you have removed them as these routes are 100% in operation and can be found selling on monarch.co.uk.
I have also re done my revision for the route Leeds Bradford Airport to Faro which is a route that will begin and currently being sold on monarch.co.uk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 19:58, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello you keep removing my edits when in fact I am correct in my edits, the routes will be operating and can be seen on <monarch.co.uk> please check out the routes and allow my changes to be made to ensure Wikipedia is kept up to date and 100% correct and reliable.
Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
What should I do then? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
My source is Monarch.co.uk? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:44, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
I give up, ha thanks anyhows, however you will see the route added within the next couple of months! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.95.15 ( talk) 20:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
People continue to add airlineroute.net as a source for Korean Air but that source cannot be used as it is not considered reliable. Thanks! 71.91.69.220 ( talk) 05:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
I've replied at Talk:PLUNA. -- RFBailey ( talk) 00:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
That is normal to repeat images of Turkish airlines aircrafts. In wiki commons category of airport is upload only 30/35 photos and 10/15 of them are of Turkish airlines. And I think it is nice to have pictures on Airlines and destinations category.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air Algérie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air Mali ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Hello. Can you please move my recently-created article Air Algérie Cargo Flight 2208 to Air Algérie Flight 2208. I cannot do it on my own because the latter page already exists, yet it's a redirect. Moreover, I made a mistake when moving the article from my sandbox, and mistakenly created User:Air Algérie Flight 2208. Can you please delete it as well?. Thanks.-- Jetstreamer Talk 15:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jetstreamer.
Sorry to bother you about Ethiopian Airlines again. I was wondering about a couple references that would be deemed acceptable, or unreliable to you. 1. I was looking on this website and say they have 9 Bombardier Q400s in the fleet and that the rest have been delivered to ASKY Airlines. So I was thinking that you should remove the order of Q400s that still appears under order. 2. I found an article stating ET's intentions to operate two of their Boeing 777-300ERs to both D.C, and Guangzhou. I looked for several articles seeing if ET ordered, or leased two Boeing 777-300ERs, but couldn't find any but the one listed above. 3. I have been hearing ET will be starting service to Madrid, Sao Paulo, and Rio de Janerio. I have found some references, but would like to see if you would see these as a reliable source to you.
-- Triple A ( talk) 18:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Just after I added Tallinn and Vilnius and revised Kuala Lumpur lines, I tried to add the references, but I was unable to do so. For some reason, I can see only limited number of references (until the one about Entebbe) and I could not add the new ones.
My references were http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/18/tk-dackul-jun13/ and http://www.airporthaber.com/havacilik-haberleri/thyden-baskentler-atagi.html by the way.
Regards, Engin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.193.30 ( talk) 15:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello again Jetstreamer,
I tried to add references many times on Turkish Airlines Destinations page, but cannot do so.
This is the official announcement regarding the initiation of Libreville service on January 31, 2013: http://www.turkishairlines.com/tr-tr/kurumsal/haberler/17318/yeni-ucuslarimiz-libreville
There is no official announcement yet, but a number of websites contain the following news. Kuala Lumpur service resumes on April 25, 2013: http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/18/tk-dackul-jun13/ Tallinn and Vilnius service begins on June 11, 2013: http://airlineroute.net/2013/01/18/tk-tllvno-jun13/
I cannot add these links to the References part.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.193.30 ( talk) 08:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Airlines for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot ( talk) 19:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Mariscal Sucre International Airport .
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.
If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.
Continued edit warring on Mariscal Sucre International Airport or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AR New Image 737-700.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g Hi!- I am... - What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC 04:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 ( talk) 04:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Jetstreamer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is just surprising. I suspect I've been blocked by the admin above because I've reported an IP user that has been acting in bad faith, ignoring all the messages left in their talk page, and the one that gets a block is me. Apart from that, I've never broken WP:3RR. Can you please give me a resonable explanation? Of course, I intend my block to be thoroughly reconsidered. As per my contributions, you can see that I've never acted in bad faith. How does this continue? Thanks.-- Jetstreamer Talk 1:23 pm, Today (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
This block should not be surprising: an appropriate warning was provided. Having reviewed the series of edits, it is clear that the block - however unfortunate it may be - was a temporary fix, as per blocking policy. There is no doubt that you edit this project in good faith, however, that does not absolve anyone from following dispute resolution processes instead of breaking key policies. Moreover, the guide to appealing blocks is quite clear that in order to be unblocked, the editor must show understanding of why they are blocked. Nowhere in this request nor in the discussion below is any such understanding apparent. Instead, there's nothing but argument and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT even when the rules and policies have been laid out clearly. As such, the block is valid, but there's nothing GAB-compliant about the request ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:32, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
In regard to the matter above, can an administrator block a user preemptively? If so, what about WP:AGF? I'm deeply concerned about this situation.-- Jetstreamer Talk 14:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Comment from blocking admin: Perhaps you should read the wikipedia page on WP:EW. It doesn't appear that you understand it.
I'm also concerned about your assertion that the IP you were edit warring with, 203.160.61.186 ( talk · contribs), was acting in bad faith. It's clear that the editor was adding unsourced info and edit warring as well, but I find it more than a stretch to say it is bad-faith editing. If I had any evidence of bad-faith editing, that IP would be blocked for a year or longer given the recent block. Toddst1 ( talk) 16:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.
{{
unblock}}
template together. Someone will look at your unblock request.
Toddst1 (
talk) 16:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Well, that's a bit discouraging, as my unblock only depends upon your decision.-- Jetstreamer Talk 19:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
I saw your entry on the Nigeria Airways Flight 2120 history log, and wanted to let you know that I found the proper references regarding the names of the flight crew members. One reference is from the Internet Movie Database entry about the episode of the 'Mayday' TV series Under Pressure. The other is from a web site dealing with the history of Nationair. The names of William Allan and Kent Davidge can be found on the IMDB page, while Victor Fehr's name is on the Nationair history page. I hope this helps. And003 ( talk) 09:15, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ethiopian Airlines. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. All the information you have removed has been added again, as per I have thoroughly researched everything and provided references. If this continues, I will take evasive action and report you to the administrator and have you blocked again. This is your first and last official warning.-- KevinMichaelBradley1996 ( talk) 19:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
User:Jetstreamer has been vandalizing my edits as well. I second the need for administrator intervention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:470:BC86:1:222:19FF:FEF3:BC0A ( talk) 21:05, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Good call on identifying
User talk:KevinMichaelBradley1996 (
talk ·
contribs) as a sockpuppet. Let me know if there are
continuing problems with the master others show up. I've identified an ipsock of that editor that you've also had interaction with.
Toddst1 (
talk) 18:30, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
The diff provided above includes just one minor edit from him/her, actually the latest made to the article, but it also includes another three ones made by the blocked user. Basically, I'm proposing to take the article to the latest clean version prior to these three edits of the blocked user. Given that that latest version is the one I contributed to, I'm asking for advice.-- Jetstreamer Talk 14:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
hi my friend. I have a problem. Could you help to me? I'm preparing destination map for LTBA but I cannot use north america relief map. When I write like this I cannot see anything.
but When I write like this I can see location map of North America. So How can I use North American relief map. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Location_map_North_America) -- Mertborak ( talk) 16:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this page? A user continues to insist that Hainan Airlines's Chicago service will be operated on a seasonal basis when it begins service on 3 September 2013 but the reference provided doesn't mention the service being seasonal and also they have been adding sister airports but I don't think it is notable to be listed. It is reverted for now. Thanks! Snoozlepet ( talk) 01:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
On 4 February 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Air Algérie Flight 2208, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an Algerian cargo aircraft crashed near a highly populated area of Northern Italy but killed only the three crew members on board? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Air Algérie Flight 2208. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 16:03, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jetstreamer - it's not easy to find a direct reference that indicates that Luke Hurley's song is about the Erebus Disaster, but the lyrics make it blindingly obvious, and I've talked with him about the song on several occasions. Hopefully a link the lyrics is close enough... Grutness... wha? 23:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jetstreamer! Recently, 2 editors have added Ethiopian Airlines to Ninoy Aquino International Airport as they are "planning" to start service to Manila on June 18, 2013 but are still citing airlineroute.net (which is NOT considered reliable) I had to revert them. Can you keep an eye on it? I had to remove the entry at Addis Ababa Bole International Airport as well. Thanks! Snoozlepet ( talk) 04:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Wikiwings | ||
In recognition of your 20000 edits mainly concerned with improving aviation articles. MilborneOne ( talk) 18:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aeroflot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farnborough ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:49, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their
user talk page. |
Hello Wikipedians! I'd like to know if edits like this one were appropriate. I've seen throughout many articles that a bot has been removing all the interwiki links ( [1], [2], [3], and so on). Some days ago, I've warned a user who removed all these links from many articles and I restored them, but it seems I shouln't had done so. Thanks in advance! -- Jetstreamer Talk 13:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Good day Please note the websites which are the source for destination : Constanta http://www.turkishairlines.com/en-int/constanta/city-guide/flights-tickets-online-booking http://wire.seenews.com/news/turkish-airlines-to-fly-from-istanbul-to-romanias-constanta-336227 And many others, in romanian language, and on the wikipedia page for Mihail Kogalniceanu airport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.12.168.225 ( talk) 13:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
addition to Constanta routes : Mihail Kogalniceanu airport website: http://www.mk-airport.ro/indexen.php under the tab destionations It is accessible for reservation under THY website(online) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.12.168.225 ( talk) 14:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I found a source for ET's service to Manila and Seoul ( http://www.ethiosports.com/2013/02/10/ethiopian-airlines-expands-asian-network/) but I don't know if this source is reliable or not. Thanks! Snoozlepet ( talk) 21:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Someone keeps removing Ethiopian Airlines from that page where as there is a source for that. Can you take a look? 68.119.73.36 ( talk) 23:23, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
EAA had FIVE Super VC10s. The Flight archive is wrong or not updated for 1969, but IS CORRECT for the World Airline Survey in 1970. See http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1970/1970%20-%200531.html 5X-UVA, 5H-MMT, 5Y-ADA were the first 3. 5X-UVJ followed in 1969. The final VC10 was 5H-MOG which was delivered in 1970. 5X-UVA was lost at Addis Ababa in April 1972. The other 4 were repossessed by BAC when EAA collapsed in the late 1970s and were converted to aerial refuellers and re-delivered to the RAF as K3 tankers. They still fly to this day. I flew on them all.
86.154.18.161 ( talk) 18:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
The article as it stands implies that EAA only operated four Super VC10s. This is just plain wrong and someone needs to sort it out. 86.154.18.161 ( talk) 19:39, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I believe that the source is genuine. It was a short-lived KLM route 151/152 that stopped at Manchester Airport on its way to Dublin from Amsterdam. It's on table 10C of the timetable, so please revert it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacktheladz ( talk • contribs) 18:40, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you know if that flight is a pure Air Seychelles flight or is Air Seychelles wet leasing an Etihad plane to fly the route. Someone keeps making that flight "Air Seychelles operated by Etihad Airways" at the Abu Dhabi AIrport page. 68.119.73.36 ( talk) 22:34, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
check the page. that is OK? :) but the direct links to Burgas Airport page with all flights timetable is not work. How to put the correct links ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lzdimitar ( talk • contribs)
I understand but the information for charters flights have only in airport website. All this information is correct but there is no where to put official resources. The same applies and to Varna Airport. From 3 years always'm adding accurate and correct information on Burgas, Varna and Sofia airports and also can easily check that. Tell your opinion how to add that information please.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lzdimitar ( talk • contribs)
Hi again ! Check Varna and Burgas airports pages. That is good ? Regards :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lzdimitar ( talk • contribs)
Hi Jetstreamer, I noticed that in early January 2013, you put a refimprove template on the top of Berlin Brandenburg Airport. In the meantime, quite a lot been has changed there. I think that by now, the article as a whole has a sufficient number of reliable sources (this might not be true for a few isolated sections). Do you have a different opinion? As always, I'd appreciate any thoughts and comments. Best regards -- FoxyOrange ( talk) 21:29, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
I can see quite a few USSR era destinations in that list. inspector ( talk) 22:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Jetstreamer, I am asking for your help with a new article I am starting called Flybe Ireland link here -> [5]. It is a new deviation of the airline being in October 2013 at Dublin and Cork. This is the only reference I can fined so fear. I need to fined more information about the airline. If you can help me with the article I would greatly appreciate it . Thank you. Myland1111 ( talk) 15:51, 12 February 2013 (GMT)
Please see that Orbest was an airline. So I have modified article Lanzarote airport as the airline is not operating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerard.edo ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
On 12 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2013 Compagnie Africaine d'Aviation crash, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the accident of a Congolese aircraft in March 2013 involved no fatalities on the ground, despite crashing in the middle of a city? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Compagnie Africaine d'Aviation crash. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Over at the Wikiproject Aviation/Aviation accident task force page [7]. You were chosen by myself because of your past work or input on aviation crash articles. Thank you for the help. ...William 11:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
"Pilot error (sometimes called cockpit error) occurs when the pilot is considered to be principally or partially responsible for an aircraft accident."
As stated in the article itself, Ethiopian Airlines disputes the conclusion of the final report released by the Lebanese Civil Aviation Authority. Please explain why you are insisting the Type be "Pilot Error."
Do read http://www.flyethiopian.com/en/docs/downloads/ET409Inv/3_Part_II_Appended_to_the_Final_Report.pdf before reverting edit of "Disputed" to "Pilot error" (I will revert back your edit if I don't have reply from you). If you still further insist that the conclusions of Lebanese Civil Aviation Authority should be taken as facts, then you are going to have to present your point as to why you believe so. Please respond, or I will go ahead and re-correct the entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 18:35, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
EAL, according to the criteria, can be considered a reliable source. The information they published is verifiable. While you are considering the context of EAL's refutation to make a judgement about reliability and verifiability (actually, probably truth too), you are disregarding the fact that LCAA also has an invested interest in this context. "The airline's press release you're citing does not provide a valid cause, it just denies the official investigation." True EAL's official refutation does not supply cause for the crash. It, with substantiated arguments, disputes LCAA's conclusion. "I'm afraid that's not enough information to say pilot error was not the cause." This is true, and on the flip side, nor does LCAA's conclusion suffice as "the truth." This is exactly my point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 22:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
What is an "official report"? LCAA conducted their investigation and arrived at a conclusion. It is LCAA's conclusion. EAL counters and disputes the conclusions. This is what we know. When "Pilot error" is listed in the box, it misleads readers giving the false impression that there is some sort of consensus. What is written already clearly indicates dispute, so what reason is there to see it as wrong to change "Pilot error" to "Disputed"? Further expansion and elaboration is, although an improvement, secondary to the discussion at hand. Under the circumstances, if you have a different/better resolution, I am interested to know. Until then, I'll go ahead and revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 23:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm asking in case I am missing something. Flight 409 crashed into Lebanese waters, but I do not at all see how this translates to LCAA's conclusions being end all be all. It seems their report is simply their stance on the matter ie their point of view. If you agree so far (as far as the purposes of Wikipedia are concerned) I hope you'll be there to revert back to "Disputed" when someone else edits it back then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 00:09, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Sounds good. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.181.183 ( talk) 00:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
And you can see masses of unreferenced material in this article - set about adding the missing information, instead of being overly critical. RuthAS ( talk) 20:33, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
You've asked source about discontinued Eskişehir flights.. Well, I do not have any source, since the airline is escaping from any such announcement, but you may try to buy a ticket to Eskişehir and see that there is no flight. Actually, they transferred the flights to Eskişehir to nearby Zafer Airport, which was opened in the last quarter of 2012. Afterwards, they cancelled both İstanbul and Brussels flights from Eskişehir.
Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.193.30 ( talk) 12:40, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering if an airline article should have a source for each seating config, especially for one going for GA. I am looking at United Airlines and none of the configs are sourced. I can source them all (they are not on the same page), but would it be an overkill? Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 00:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Finally got back to this one. What do you think about an extra column for the ref like this on on my Sandbox page, it does need finishing but you get the idea. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 19:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Revolution1221 ( talk) 15:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Template:Refimprove article tagging should be used ONLY if there are MAJOR , OBVIOUS distortions of Main parts of the article, when inline tags are not enough.
You often tag the whole article without any clear thoughts seen.
Article tagging is NOT the purpose of Wikipedia.
Try to think and express your thoughts DETAILED. Only this will help: don't WP:POINT or WP:DISRUPT readers. Inline tags are BEST and help to improve.
For other or general criticism the article talk is best. Tagremover ( talk) 19:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
The user above and me have been into an argument regarding the discussion above. I see the user removing the {{ refimprove}} from lots of articles I've tagged, something pretty clear from their username. What to do? I often tag articles that are in need of more sourcing, as it's the standard, while s(he) insists on using {{ cn}} instead, which I found to be tag bombing. Thanks in advance for any comments.-- Jetstreamer Talk 01:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
The Citation Needed template contains the following information in its documentation:
This template is intended for specific passages that need citation. For entire articles or sections that contain significant material lacking sources (rather than just specific short passages), there are other, more appropriate templates, such as {{ Unreferenced}} or {{ Refimprove}}.
So I agree with you that covering the article with Citation Needed templates is not best practices. -- Dianna ( talk) 03:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, First of all, i'm not familiar with wiki editions. I hope i didn't create any panic. I don't want any vandalism, for sure.. :) Regarding TK destination page, I've tried to remove all extra references and replace with TK's official timetable issued on 5th of April. I thought no more reference needed anymore. In this regard, besides removing the old references, i've also added Gassim and Isparta destinations; I've indicated the suspended flights of Aleppo, Damascus and Sinop. Removed the cargo reference of Paris-CDG. I think that's all what i've changed yesterday.. Any suggestion, rejection and objection will be highly appreciated, of course.. Thanks & Kind Regards.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ushuaia1 ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am just wondering what you think about this please? I am just a little sick of people flooding article with images. I like the way Kenya Airways is with a minimal amount of images. Thanks -- JetBlast ( talk) 10:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
The citation I included for the Comet 4 information was included in my edit and was from here - http://www.aussieairliners.org/dh%20comet/austcometregister.htm.
The 747SP and 747-300 information was from here - http://www.aussieairliners.org/b-747/aust747index.html
The 767 information was from here http://www.aussieairliners.org/b-767/767australia.htm
I am happy to add in the citations for these if you like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trentles ( talk • contribs) 12:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi
I thought the fact that I am a pilot with the company, albeit a senior pilot, will be enough grounds for the changes to be factual.
Currently 4x E135's are operated. 2x B735's are no longer in service. V5NDI has been ferried to the UK; and V5TNP is awaiting spares in Johannesburg, in order for the ferry flight to take place.
FYI: http://www.airnamibia.com.na/fleet
41.182.93.17 ( talk) 16:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Regards tbl
There is wrong data about the flight detail of Turkish Airlines and I just tried to correct that which is Kuala-Lumpur flights. There wrights "resumes" and it has to be changed with "begins" this is all. I follow Turkish Airlines everyday even my office is just nearby Ataturk Airport. I can see the runway,parked planes,take offs and if they change the runways rarely landings. There are so many things to correct but Wikipedia do not let me correct the mistakes or add missing parts. For example cargo flight of MAS or Korean or 3 times a week I see the planes of Iberia which they resumed like that. What do I have to do to sort these corrections out and add the missing details.
Best regards,
Rifat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.238.127.230 ( talk) 08:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
You removed a phrase I added in the lead section, explaining there that... this "adition" does not belong in the lead section. Well, some downright stupidities, though, it seems belong there, in your opinion. Anyway, I still wonder why it is ok to keep in that very lead section the fact that official soviet casualty count was disputed (w/o a hint to any verifiable source or reference) and the truism that the "cancers are still being accounted for", but not a detail that clarify the fact that beyond any dispute, and beyond any statistic made today or in the future, there is already KNOWN the fact that any increase in cancer rates, if detectable, shall be small. BTW, suggesting that one of the effects of radiation spread by the accident is having "deformities" in humans (or animals) is downright false and stupid, at least according to the source I already cited in support of the claims you hurried to remove:
So when we put these Chernobyl-related doses in context, it is reasonably clear that a large increase in cancers is unlikely. […] Despite these strong scientific data, stories in newspapers, magazines, and even books continue to describe children with birth defects supposedly from Chernobyl and, in one instance, a three-headed cow. These claims have no basis in fact.
Not even the more- and heavier-exposed survivers of the a-bombs in hiroshima and nagasaky had frequently such "deformities", and the explanation for that fact is quite simple. So, simply removing a pertinent elucidation supported by verifiable and reliable sources, that tried only to remove the doubts a more-than-imperfect phrasing slyly suggest, you seem pretty much biased. Can`t you try to contribute more - and more often - in ADDING details substantiated with verifiable and reliable sources, than "contributing" here by removing the contributions of the others, my dear "jetstreamer"? Remus Octavian Mocanu ( talk) 04:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I just reverted your edit to the Aeroflot Flight 593 page because I wanted to clarify that this addition was in fact just a translation based on the primary source (The Youtube video linked). Which is why it should be a part of the article.
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 10:15, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
P.S. No need for Talkbacks. I'm watching your talk page right now. Also, if need be, linking my username works just as well (Thanks to the new notifications) TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 10:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Cool, that's good for me. I have a concern regarding the name of the unidentified pilot. Is there any source for that? Is tha stuff included in the video?-- Jetstreamer Talk 10:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
HEllo Jetstreamer the 737-800 CN-RGN has an 50th aircraft logo on the side. Royal Air Maroc say this on her facebook page. And shown pictures of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.80.188.105 ( talk) 11:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)