Thanks for telling me how to sign comments! BollyDave ( talk) 15:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Not that you're 'involved', but since you're quoted, be aware of this: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mrandrewnohome#Unblock_request μηδείς ( talk) 23:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you undid Anthony Appleyard's redirect of Limberbutt. Would you be kind enough to move Limberbutt to Limberbutt McCubbins over the redirect? The article should really be at the full name. I think Anthnoy saw my move request and that's what prompted him to redirect the article. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 14:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I just wanted to pop in to say "Thanks" to you, Newyorkbrad, Liz, Diannaa, Renamed user 51g7z61hz5af2azs6k6, and KoshVorlon for interjecting reason while I was away. Of course it was an RFC I had forgotten entirely about during one of my (increasingly long and increasingly frequent) absences (precisely because the issues there so disgusted me, so I left), and of course if I had not been in the Caribbean when the old RFC diffs were called to my attention, I would have immediately removed them. It is outlandish that diffs for an RFC were characterized as an "enemy list". That some editors continue to carry grudges for FIVE years (even after Floquenbeam denied the characterization of an RFC prep page as an "attack" page) is what convinced me this time to extend my vacation from WickyWackiness as long as possible. I do appreciate those who spoke up, but one tires of these endless grudges and retaliatory behaviors. I'm sorry I left @ WP:FAR coordinators: holding the ball on a large project we had undertaken, but enough is enough. Thanks again, Best regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
(As it has been termed.) Hello; you might wish to see and perhaps even comment on this at WP:AN/I. -- Hoary ( talk) 02:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Jayron32 , i worked in this film from day one aas an production support this man Harinder sikka is big fraud man , please un protect this artical other wise legal notice will be send to you
truly Negi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.147.55.196 ( talk) 05:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crystal Coast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cape Lookout. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
In lots of article talk pages there is a very large message: This article is part of Wikiproject so and so. I created a few articles recently. I don't know how to add these wikiproject children's literature, wikiproject women writers in the talk pages of the articles. -- Action Hero 16:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, I reverted your addition to
Template:CENT, per
WP:CENT which says: Cent is generally used to draw attention to discussions regarding policies, guidelines or other matters that have a wide impact and on which a broad consensus is needed. Announcements, such as for ArbCom elections, etc., are generally done via the Watchlist notice or the Sitenotice. Discussions related to content, including use of infoboxes and templates within a specific topic area, are usually best advertised within the appropriate WikiProjects.
It also states, in the "inappropriate" list, Minor matters, housekeeping, article content discussions, or maintenance
and Content disputes
. Thanks for understanding!
Kharkiv07 (
T) 03:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
... that "the concept of the good-natured insult is a uniquely American phenomenon"? Or at least had its origins in the USA?
Shakespeare is full of such things. As were his forebears. And his French, Italian, German and other colleagues. I'd say it's a common human behaviour, LONG predating the US of A. Were you perhaps joking? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
I see you answered a question by user Desklin at the humanities. I have removed the section, the consensus here /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk/Archive_118#Return_of_User:Bowei_Huang_2_sock was that desklin is a sock of bowei huang. μηδείς ( talk) 16:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
If he's known, he's known and if trolls are banned, they're banned. Fair enough. But trolls don't want the sort of crumbs I throw. Too simple. Some Jews are for it, for aren't, case closed. Trolls eat anger, confusion, conflict, disruption, that sort of junk. Some eat goats. Most will take a revert war, if they can't get a enraged response. Feed a troll some brief knowledge, they'll either get wiser or bored. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:54, September 24, 2015 (UTC)
Why did you completely erase my question? Huh? Because I wasn't being politically correct? STOP THE LEFT CENSORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.7.159.50 ( talk) 15:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. Could I kindly request you not to close AN/I discussions that discuss matters you are involved in? The problems with your doing this should be obvious, so I won't spell it out for you. Thanks a lot for your understanding. -- John ( talk) 17:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
As I suspected, our editor concerned with apostrophes is back, see https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science&diff=682626483&oldid=682626119 The IP who made the edit is just back from being blocked for a year for being a cuddlyable3 sock. Presumably the registered editor who showed up asking if we could edit people's apostrophes is the same. I am off to watch the game, so don't have time to file an SPI, but am letting you know. If you look at the IP's block log you'll see what I am talking about. μηδείς ( talk) 22:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I mentioned you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sloopcaptain. Just FYI. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 04:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. My first instinct was that this person was engaging in block evasion too based on their mention of a block. However when I saw the response by User:Yunshui [1] I am now thinking this all took place on another wiki. If the block was on another wiki then they are not really engaging in block evasion, rather they are just looking in the wrong place.
I can't even figure out what language https://hy.wikipedia.org is. You may know something I don't, but I wanted to make sure you knew all the details. I will leave this in your capable hands. HighInBC (was Chillum) 19:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 •
About the Newsletter
Hello. You placed the article Homo naledi under full protection on September 25th. While the RfC was closed as stale, the discussion (of which I am a participant) remains on Talk:Homo naledi. 3rd party eyes are needed and welcome. Please feel free to weigh in on whether arbitration may needed, or if a lower level of page protection is warranted. Cheers, --Animalparty! ( talk) 21:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.
Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 01:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Howdy. Would you place my final post into the now closed discussion on March 3 or 4? I hadn't noticed your closure, until after I posted. GoodDay ( talk) 23:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
discussions about the evilness and/or ignorance of Americans can go on elsewhere
Hi. You have been mentioned in relation to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Timothyhere#16_October_2015. μηδείς ( talk) 03:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
I sometimes see "The Neutrality of this Article is Disputed" tag on articles. How does one dispute an article's neutrality? Does it take at least two editors "disputing" to create a dispute? Does an Administrator have to tag the article? I've run across some articles that seem to have a lot of bias and I wonder how this is done. Thanks. Foreignshore ( talk) 04:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Only because someone has a spanish Name he gets banned? -- Poker chip ( talk) 15:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e- composted SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, sorry to both you, but can you take a look at the Sanford I. Weill page. It's obviously an opinion, but I believe another editor is editing in bad faith. Ultimately, I believe he/she has an ulterior motive in objecting to use of the word "philanthropist" for the subject. It started with an tedious argument over the definition of the word itself and spiraled from there. I believe the editor is a student or otherwise connect to the failed donation to Paul Smith's college. Suffice it to say, when I've added both 1) high quality sources which characterize the man as a philanthropist and 2) there are descriptions and sources which describe his actual philanthropic activities, it's hard to imagine a legitimate basis to deny calling him a philanthropist. The editor seems to have a personal interest in the article. Any assistance would be appreciated. ButtonwoodTree ( talk) 00:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Era of Good Feelings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Stockton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I see that you removed the pending changes protection for 1992 United States men's Olympic basketball team. I'm all for keeping WP as open as possible. AFAICS, the vast majority of edits from editors that are not autoconfirmed have been reverted on this article. This seems consistent with the purpose of "pending changes" protection, which leaves the article open for editing to all (as opposed to semi-protection), but requires that the infrequent edits by non-autoconfirmed editors be reviewed before they are made available for general public viewing. I'd be interested in your perspective on this. Thanks.— Bagumba ( talk) 16:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This page was given semi-protection in 2011 due to heavy vandalism and unsourced claims. Can you please revert your edit, and extend similar protection to 2010s in fashion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 ( talk • contribs)
No need to take action, just an FYI of /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bowei_Huang_2#Bowei_Huang_2. ") μηδείς ( talk) 03:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I see that you blocked the range 199.7.159.0/25. Is there aany reason the block wasn't set to anon only? A user on this range, Quadibloc, is asking to be allowed to edit from this range. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your closure of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive903#Harry Jaffee's illness, you did notice there were veiled legal threats? Both I and the other editor mentioned this. I believe the level of threat was clearly, obviously, definitely below actual admin action, but it is the sort of thing that tilts towards ANI, does it not? Choor monster ( talk) 13:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Who do you think will play the Jaguars in London next year in the NFL International Series? -- 74.130.133.1 ( talk) 00:41, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, Due to the time difference between North America and where I am, I missed the entire latter part of the discussion of my IP on the main page re gender bias. Just wanted to acknowledge your role in stepping in and closing down a conversation which, I agree, was getting nowhere. Cheers, MurielMary ( talk) 07:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)MurielMary
Thanks for answering my question on Village Pump about where to find information about Wikipedia statistics and new article submissions. You've helped me immensely! Evoapps ( talk) 23:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
We've reached five million!!
The English Wikipedia now has over 5,000,000 articles! Woo-hoo! Feel free to pass this message on! You can never celebrate too much. Eman235/ talk 18:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC) |
211.30.17.74 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{ subst:Kittynap}}
Thanks for helping me find some good science websites for kids. 211.30.17.74 ( talk) 06:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
You can take a vacation but you are never allowed to retire from WP. Thanks 64.170.21.194 ( talk) 02:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32, I just wanted to alert you to the ongoing debates on Talk:American football and would appreciate any intervention which you can add to end this debate in a civil and reseasonable manner. The main debate concerns the usage of the word "football" in the article and whether there should be a preference for full names or abbreviated names. Some other editors seem to have objections to some of my other fhanges, but I have to get any specifics concerning this. Thank you for any help which you can lend. ParkH.Davis ( talk) 18:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I have nominated History of American football for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ParkH.Davis ( talk) 20:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I wonder if WMF should look into dealing with that fellow who keeps disrupting WP:ANI? -- GoodDay ( talk) 12:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchester, New Hampshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I must say that I'm very pleased to be considered your gang friend. I've reported the user to AIV, but I thought you might find the incident amusing. Tevildo ( talk) 00:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
You are listed at that wikiproject; I'm working with a beginning editor who is trying to get through WP:AFC, and has been since May or so. They are getting frustrated, so I'm pinging some of the people on the Elvis list, to see if I can find a subject-matter-wikipedian to help out with the article in question. Topic is one Larry Geller, who was the hair-dresser-slash-religious-advisor from 1964 to 1967ish and then again during the 1970s. There are probably enough refs to justify a dedicated article, or if not, certainly enough to justify a subsection of an extant Elvis article, I believe. Please see User_talk:Keshakoko1, if you have time and inclination to lend a hand with this. Thanks, 75.108.94.227 ( talk) 11:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Please read this FYI note. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 13:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Jayron
You seem perplexed ("I don't understand the objection to my statement that the UK grants knighthoods as a form of honor on a person").
Well, that statement is uncontentious, but it is not what you said. What you said was:
• That is, after the fall of the HRE, the term "Geheimrat" came to be an honorary title in Germany, not unlike "Honorary Knighthood" as it is applied today in the UK (that is, one is Knighted not because one will be a military officer in service to the King, as was the original meaning).
That's what I questioned. The term "Honorary knighthood" is indeed used in the UK, but it does NOT mean a knight from outside the military. That is NOT how the term "is applied today in the UK". I've explained what it does mean, that it applies to people who are not UK or Commonwealth citizens, and has nothing whatsoever to do with their military associations or lack thereof.
Examples: Sir Ian McKellen is a substantive knight and can call himself Sir Ian, because he's a UK citizen. Bill Gates is an honorary knight, and can refer to himself as "Bill Gates KBE", but he cannot call himself "Sir Bill Gates". Neither of these people is a member of the military, but it would make absolutely no difference if either or both were.
I’m happy to explain this further if you're still unclear.
This has nothing to do with you being wrong or anyone wanting to make you wrong. It's about achieving a common understanding of the situation. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Did this user create any auto biographical page which was deleted. Check his first edit. -- Galaxy Kid ( talk) 13:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Right now there are four blurbs, and the Main Page is off-balanced. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
What record do you believe Green Bay will finish with? -- 74.131.36.145 ( talk) 21:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I moved your addition to the avove page. Just crediting you here for the additions. Lihaas ( talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your recent help with my issue with the Danbury, Connecticut article. I think the article will be improved as a result, instead of axed, and it feels reassuring to me that disputes of this kind can be worked out under the guidelines of Wikipedia. Much appreciation. SageRad ( talk) 20:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
see this The page claims this has happened before. Do you have any info about such past incidents/crises? Just curious is all. 199.19.248.60 ( talk) 04:56, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 •
About the Newsletter
|
|
Per your recent post in the Reference desk Why is this not a concrete definition of life? "Life is a characteristic that distinguishes things that have signaling and self sustaining processes from those that do not either because such functions have ceased (ie death) or such functions were never inherent to begin with and are therefore labeled as inanimate". That seems to be a great definition. In regards to prions and viruses, if they meet 99~ percent of the requirements to be constituted as life then viruses and prions are organisms right? Is this a consequence of pedants bickering over the 1% difference? 199.19.248.76 ( talk) 00:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
That's awesome you're still around and making edits over at the ref-desk. Back in 2008 or 2009 I raised a good point and had an interesting question about fluid pressure as I was studying (self-teaching) fluid dynamics from an introductory physics textbook. Well you gave an amazing answer that I will do doubt remember the rest of my life about how I could think of "springs" between water molecules and that the pressure on the bottom water molecules have the "spring force" of the water molecule directly above it and all the spring forces of the "pillar" of water atoms directly above it. Although there aren't actual springs between molecules nor do they stay perfectly stacked in a solid lattice -- it was still one of the greatest explanations about how to think of understanding pressure! From what I've learned about the actual process of learning -- I guess you consider yourself a "visual learner" too when it comes to understanding concepts? (high spatial intelligence also means you can bag groceries very efficiently -- pack items into a car trunk exceptionally well -- and be good at games such as chess & baduk/go) Do you still remember that particular fluids question by any chance? Adwctam ( talk) 05:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Jay, don't see any correction of the San Bernadino ITN item at my end.
For what it's worth, the actual southernmost point of Canada is Middle Island in Lake Erie. It's far enough south and east of Detroit/Windsor that either one, or some point in between, might be relevant to the question in RD/H. -- 76.69.45.64 ( talk) 04:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Romantic nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balance of power. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't come up with "newsworthy deaths" like you. I was too preoccupied by massive instruction changes. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jayron32
I'm new to the reference desk. Someone answered my question in the entertainment section (Rhapsody In Blue) and I'd like to respond with thanks. How do I do that? I also noted that you showed me several article about Rhapsody And Gershin - a lot to read there. Thank you.
Rcrmartin ( talk) 23:35, 11 December 2015 e(UTC)
Thanks for the ping re DRV, that was very straight up of you. Lot's of people don't bother, and I appreciate your taking the time. Guy ( Help!) 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Per THIS why is this allowed to go on? Why are there no enforcers for the rules? 199.19.248.76 ( talk) 00:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dick Shawn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counter culture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
So how do you become a Wikipedia editor? By the way, I will donate to Wikipedia when it stops being politically correct. T A Francis ( talk) 19:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Damarious Randall, please intercept Andrewman327 is an admitted sock of Starship9000, whose cross-wiki abuse led to a global lock. Could we please have this sock locked as well, as all the others have? Thanks, GAB Hello! 20:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. The reverted edit can be found
here.
Eteethan
(talk)🎄 14:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Sorry.
Eteethan
(talk)🎄 20:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
WickWack has said they have no interest in returning. This has moved past the point of usefulness. -- Jayron 32 03:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Ya think wickwack is testing a new way to troll? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Resolved
|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.193.104 ( talk) 17:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Re:
"This is not an administrator issue. Please don't use this desk merely to attract attention to discussions, such as an ongoing AFD. That's an improper form of canvasing..."
Yep, you have one coming for that... A little common sense, please. Carrite ( talk) 03:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!'
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 01:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)'
MarnetteD|
Talk is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 85, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metrolina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas, Jayron, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 04:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary
blisters. |
I have some questions related to the Packers so can you answer these questions:
-- Jayron 32 04:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Valid concerns on both sides. Needs a change of venue. -- Jayron 32 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Sorry, but this [2] was a bad move. We've seen over the last three months that short-term protection simply doesn't work there. Not surprisingly, the trolls were back in less than an hour. I've stated my position here: [3]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of English monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for telling me how to sign comments! BollyDave ( talk) 15:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Not that you're 'involved', but since you're quoted, be aware of this: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mrandrewnohome#Unblock_request μηδείς ( talk) 23:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you undid Anthony Appleyard's redirect of Limberbutt. Would you be kind enough to move Limberbutt to Limberbutt McCubbins over the redirect? The article should really be at the full name. I think Anthnoy saw my move request and that's what prompted him to redirect the article. ~ ONUnicorn( Talk| Contribs) problem solving 14:48, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I just wanted to pop in to say "Thanks" to you, Newyorkbrad, Liz, Diannaa, Renamed user 51g7z61hz5af2azs6k6, and KoshVorlon for interjecting reason while I was away. Of course it was an RFC I had forgotten entirely about during one of my (increasingly long and increasingly frequent) absences (precisely because the issues there so disgusted me, so I left), and of course if I had not been in the Caribbean when the old RFC diffs were called to my attention, I would have immediately removed them. It is outlandish that diffs for an RFC were characterized as an "enemy list". That some editors continue to carry grudges for FIVE years (even after Floquenbeam denied the characterization of an RFC prep page as an "attack" page) is what convinced me this time to extend my vacation from WickyWackiness as long as possible. I do appreciate those who spoke up, but one tires of these endless grudges and retaliatory behaviors. I'm sorry I left @ WP:FAR coordinators: holding the ball on a large project we had undertaken, but enough is enough. Thanks again, Best regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 01:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
(As it has been termed.) Hello; you might wish to see and perhaps even comment on this at WP:AN/I. -- Hoary ( talk) 02:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
|
|
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS |
Jayron32 , i worked in this film from day one aas an production support this man Harinder sikka is big fraud man , please un protect this artical other wise legal notice will be send to you
truly Negi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.147.55.196 ( talk) 05:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crystal Coast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cape Lookout. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
In lots of article talk pages there is a very large message: This article is part of Wikiproject so and so. I created a few articles recently. I don't know how to add these wikiproject children's literature, wikiproject women writers in the talk pages of the articles. -- Action Hero 16:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, I reverted your addition to
Template:CENT, per
WP:CENT which says: Cent is generally used to draw attention to discussions regarding policies, guidelines or other matters that have a wide impact and on which a broad consensus is needed. Announcements, such as for ArbCom elections, etc., are generally done via the Watchlist notice or the Sitenotice. Discussions related to content, including use of infoboxes and templates within a specific topic area, are usually best advertised within the appropriate WikiProjects.
It also states, in the "inappropriate" list, Minor matters, housekeeping, article content discussions, or maintenance
and Content disputes
. Thanks for understanding!
Kharkiv07 (
T) 03:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
... that "the concept of the good-natured insult is a uniquely American phenomenon"? Or at least had its origins in the USA?
Shakespeare is full of such things. As were his forebears. And his French, Italian, German and other colleagues. I'd say it's a common human behaviour, LONG predating the US of A. Were you perhaps joking? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
I see you answered a question by user Desklin at the humanities. I have removed the section, the consensus here /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Reference_desk/Archive_118#Return_of_User:Bowei_Huang_2_sock was that desklin is a sock of bowei huang. μηδείς ( talk) 16:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
If he's known, he's known and if trolls are banned, they're banned. Fair enough. But trolls don't want the sort of crumbs I throw. Too simple. Some Jews are for it, for aren't, case closed. Trolls eat anger, confusion, conflict, disruption, that sort of junk. Some eat goats. Most will take a revert war, if they can't get a enraged response. Feed a troll some brief knowledge, they'll either get wiser or bored. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:54, September 24, 2015 (UTC)
Why did you completely erase my question? Huh? Because I wasn't being politically correct? STOP THE LEFT CENSORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.7.159.50 ( talk) 15:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. Could I kindly request you not to close AN/I discussions that discuss matters you are involved in? The problems with your doing this should be obvious, so I won't spell it out for you. Thanks a lot for your understanding. -- John ( talk) 17:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
As I suspected, our editor concerned with apostrophes is back, see https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science&diff=682626483&oldid=682626119 The IP who made the edit is just back from being blocked for a year for being a cuddlyable3 sock. Presumably the registered editor who showed up asking if we could edit people's apostrophes is the same. I am off to watch the game, so don't have time to file an SPI, but am letting you know. If you look at the IP's block log you'll see what I am talking about. μηδείς ( talk) 22:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I mentioned you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sloopcaptain. Just FYI. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 04:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. My first instinct was that this person was engaging in block evasion too based on their mention of a block. However when I saw the response by User:Yunshui [1] I am now thinking this all took place on another wiki. If the block was on another wiki then they are not really engaging in block evasion, rather they are just looking in the wrong place.
I can't even figure out what language https://hy.wikipedia.org is. You may know something I don't, but I wanted to make sure you knew all the details. I will leave this in your capable hands. HighInBC (was Chillum) 19:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 •
About the Newsletter
Hello. You placed the article Homo naledi under full protection on September 25th. While the RfC was closed as stale, the discussion (of which I am a participant) remains on Talk:Homo naledi. 3rd party eyes are needed and welcome. Please feel free to weigh in on whether arbitration may needed, or if a lower level of page protection is warranted. Cheers, --Animalparty! ( talk) 21:41, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.
Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 01:51, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Howdy. Would you place my final post into the now closed discussion on March 3 or 4? I hadn't noticed your closure, until after I posted. GoodDay ( talk) 23:53, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
discussions about the evilness and/or ignorance of Americans can go on elsewhere
Hi. You have been mentioned in relation to /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Timothyhere#16_October_2015. μηδείς ( talk) 03:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
I sometimes see "The Neutrality of this Article is Disputed" tag on articles. How does one dispute an article's neutrality? Does it take at least two editors "disputing" to create a dispute? Does an Administrator have to tag the article? I've run across some articles that seem to have a lot of bias and I wonder how this is done. Thanks. Foreignshore ( talk) 04:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Only because someone has a spanish Name he gets banned? -- Poker chip ( talk) 15:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e- composted SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi, sorry to both you, but can you take a look at the Sanford I. Weill page. It's obviously an opinion, but I believe another editor is editing in bad faith. Ultimately, I believe he/she has an ulterior motive in objecting to use of the word "philanthropist" for the subject. It started with an tedious argument over the definition of the word itself and spiraled from there. I believe the editor is a student or otherwise connect to the failed donation to Paul Smith's college. Suffice it to say, when I've added both 1) high quality sources which characterize the man as a philanthropist and 2) there are descriptions and sources which describe his actual philanthropic activities, it's hard to imagine a legitimate basis to deny calling him a philanthropist. The editor seems to have a personal interest in the article. Any assistance would be appreciated. ButtonwoodTree ( talk) 00:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Era of Good Feelings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Stockton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
I see that you removed the pending changes protection for 1992 United States men's Olympic basketball team. I'm all for keeping WP as open as possible. AFAICS, the vast majority of edits from editors that are not autoconfirmed have been reverted on this article. This seems consistent with the purpose of "pending changes" protection, which leaves the article open for editing to all (as opposed to semi-protection), but requires that the infrequent edits by non-autoconfirmed editors be reviewed before they are made available for general public viewing. I'd be interested in your perspective on this. Thanks.— Bagumba ( talk) 16:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This page was given semi-protection in 2011 due to heavy vandalism and unsourced claims. Can you please revert your edit, and extend similar protection to 2010s in fashion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 ( talk • contribs)
No need to take action, just an FYI of /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bowei_Huang_2#Bowei_Huang_2. ") μηδείς ( talk) 03:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
I see that you blocked the range 199.7.159.0/25. Is there aany reason the block wasn't set to anon only? A user on this range, Quadibloc, is asking to be allowed to edit from this range. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:40, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your closure of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive903#Harry Jaffee's illness, you did notice there were veiled legal threats? Both I and the other editor mentioned this. I believe the level of threat was clearly, obviously, definitely below actual admin action, but it is the sort of thing that tilts towards ANI, does it not? Choor monster ( talk) 13:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Who do you think will play the Jaguars in London next year in the NFL International Series? -- 74.130.133.1 ( talk) 00:41, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron, Due to the time difference between North America and where I am, I missed the entire latter part of the discussion of my IP on the main page re gender bias. Just wanted to acknowledge your role in stepping in and closing down a conversation which, I agree, was getting nowhere. Cheers, MurielMary ( talk) 07:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)MurielMary
Thanks for answering my question on Village Pump about where to find information about Wikipedia statistics and new article submissions. You've helped me immensely! Evoapps ( talk) 23:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
We've reached five million!!
The English Wikipedia now has over 5,000,000 articles! Woo-hoo! Feel free to pass this message on! You can never celebrate too much. Eman235/ talk 18:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC) |
211.30.17.74 has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{ subst:Kittynap}}
Thanks for helping me find some good science websites for kids. 211.30.17.74 ( talk) 06:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
You can take a vacation but you are never allowed to retire from WP. Thanks 64.170.21.194 ( talk) 02:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jayron32, I just wanted to alert you to the ongoing debates on Talk:American football and would appreciate any intervention which you can add to end this debate in a civil and reseasonable manner. The main debate concerns the usage of the word "football" in the article and whether there should be a preference for full names or abbreviated names. Some other editors seem to have objections to some of my other fhanges, but I have to get any specifics concerning this. Thank you for any help which you can lend. ParkH.Davis ( talk) 18:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I have nominated History of American football for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ParkH.Davis ( talk) 20:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
I wonder if WMF should look into dealing with that fellow who keeps disrupting WP:ANI? -- GoodDay ( talk) 12:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchester, New Hampshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen City. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I must say that I'm very pleased to be considered your gang friend. I've reported the user to AIV, but I thought you might find the incident amusing. Tevildo ( talk) 00:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
You are listed at that wikiproject; I'm working with a beginning editor who is trying to get through WP:AFC, and has been since May or so. They are getting frustrated, so I'm pinging some of the people on the Elvis list, to see if I can find a subject-matter-wikipedian to help out with the article in question. Topic is one Larry Geller, who was the hair-dresser-slash-religious-advisor from 1964 to 1967ish and then again during the 1970s. There are probably enough refs to justify a dedicated article, or if not, certainly enough to justify a subsection of an extant Elvis article, I believe. Please see User_talk:Keshakoko1, if you have time and inclination to lend a hand with this. Thanks, 75.108.94.227 ( talk) 11:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Please read this FYI note. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 13:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Jayron
You seem perplexed ("I don't understand the objection to my statement that the UK grants knighthoods as a form of honor on a person").
Well, that statement is uncontentious, but it is not what you said. What you said was:
• That is, after the fall of the HRE, the term "Geheimrat" came to be an honorary title in Germany, not unlike "Honorary Knighthood" as it is applied today in the UK (that is, one is Knighted not because one will be a military officer in service to the King, as was the original meaning).
That's what I questioned. The term "Honorary knighthood" is indeed used in the UK, but it does NOT mean a knight from outside the military. That is NOT how the term "is applied today in the UK". I've explained what it does mean, that it applies to people who are not UK or Commonwealth citizens, and has nothing whatsoever to do with their military associations or lack thereof.
Examples: Sir Ian McKellen is a substantive knight and can call himself Sir Ian, because he's a UK citizen. Bill Gates is an honorary knight, and can refer to himself as "Bill Gates KBE", but he cannot call himself "Sir Bill Gates". Neither of these people is a member of the military, but it would make absolutely no difference if either or both were.
I’m happy to explain this further if you're still unclear.
This has nothing to do with you being wrong or anyone wanting to make you wrong. It's about achieving a common understanding of the situation. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Did this user create any auto biographical page which was deleted. Check his first edit. -- Galaxy Kid ( talk) 13:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Right now there are four blurbs, and the Main Page is off-balanced. -- George Ho ( talk) 19:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
What record do you believe Green Bay will finish with? -- 74.131.36.145 ( talk) 21:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I moved your addition to the avove page. Just crediting you here for the additions. Lihaas ( talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your recent help with my issue with the Danbury, Connecticut article. I think the article will be improved as a result, instead of axed, and it feels reassuring to me that disputes of this kind can be worked out under the guidelines of Wikipedia. Much appreciation. SageRad ( talk) 20:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
see this The page claims this has happened before. Do you have any info about such past incidents/crises? Just curious is all. 199.19.248.60 ( talk) 04:56, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 •
About the Newsletter
|
|
Per your recent post in the Reference desk Why is this not a concrete definition of life? "Life is a characteristic that distinguishes things that have signaling and self sustaining processes from those that do not either because such functions have ceased (ie death) or such functions were never inherent to begin with and are therefore labeled as inanimate". That seems to be a great definition. In regards to prions and viruses, if they meet 99~ percent of the requirements to be constituted as life then viruses and prions are organisms right? Is this a consequence of pedants bickering over the 1% difference? 199.19.248.76 ( talk) 00:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
That's awesome you're still around and making edits over at the ref-desk. Back in 2008 or 2009 I raised a good point and had an interesting question about fluid pressure as I was studying (self-teaching) fluid dynamics from an introductory physics textbook. Well you gave an amazing answer that I will do doubt remember the rest of my life about how I could think of "springs" between water molecules and that the pressure on the bottom water molecules have the "spring force" of the water molecule directly above it and all the spring forces of the "pillar" of water atoms directly above it. Although there aren't actual springs between molecules nor do they stay perfectly stacked in a solid lattice -- it was still one of the greatest explanations about how to think of understanding pressure! From what I've learned about the actual process of learning -- I guess you consider yourself a "visual learner" too when it comes to understanding concepts? (high spatial intelligence also means you can bag groceries very efficiently -- pack items into a car trunk exceptionally well -- and be good at games such as chess & baduk/go) Do you still remember that particular fluids question by any chance? Adwctam ( talk) 05:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Jay, don't see any correction of the San Bernadino ITN item at my end.
For what it's worth, the actual southernmost point of Canada is Middle Island in Lake Erie. It's far enough south and east of Detroit/Windsor that either one, or some point in between, might be relevant to the question in RD/H. -- 76.69.45.64 ( talk) 04:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Romantic nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balance of power. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't come up with "newsworthy deaths" like you. I was too preoccupied by massive instruction changes. -- George Ho ( talk) 00:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Jayron32
I'm new to the reference desk. Someone answered my question in the entertainment section (Rhapsody In Blue) and I'd like to respond with thanks. How do I do that? I also noted that you showed me several article about Rhapsody And Gershin - a lot to read there. Thank you.
Rcrmartin ( talk) 23:35, 11 December 2015 e(UTC)
Thanks for the ping re DRV, that was very straight up of you. Lot's of people don't bother, and I appreciate your taking the time. Guy ( Help!) 19:17, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Per THIS why is this allowed to go on? Why are there no enforcers for the rules? 199.19.248.76 ( talk) 00:30, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dick Shawn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counter culture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
So how do you become a Wikipedia editor? By the way, I will donate to Wikipedia when it stops being politically correct. T A Francis ( talk) 19:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Damarious Randall, please intercept Andrewman327 is an admitted sock of Starship9000, whose cross-wiki abuse led to a global lock. Could we please have this sock locked as well, as all the others have? Thanks, GAB Hello! 20:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. The reverted edit can be found
here.
Eteethan
(talk)🎄 14:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC) Sorry.
Eteethan
(talk)🎄 20:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
WickWack has said they have no interest in returning. This has moved past the point of usefulness. -- Jayron 32 03:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Ya think wickwack is testing a new way to troll? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:53, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Resolved
|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.193.104 ( talk) 17:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Re:
"This is not an administrator issue. Please don't use this desk merely to attract attention to discussions, such as an ongoing AFD. That's an improper form of canvasing..."
Yep, you have one coming for that... A little common sense, please. Carrite ( talk) 03:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
To You and Yours!'
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 01:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)'
MarnetteD|
Talk is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 85, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metrolina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas, Jayron, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 04:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary
blisters. |
I have some questions related to the Packers so can you answer these questions:
-- Jayron 32 04:13, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Valid concerns on both sides. Needs a change of venue. -- Jayron 32 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Sorry, but this [2] was a bad move. We've seen over the last three months that short-term protection simply doesn't work there. Not surprisingly, the trolls were back in less than an hour. I've stated my position here: [3]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:53, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of English monarchs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)