From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good call with applying semi-protection onto this article - it was definitely needed. I wanted to give you a heads up that I went and extended the protection duration to three months. When I look back through the edit history, this exact kind of BLP libel and disruption goes back much further than today, and I felt that it was warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions, concerns, or objections to this - I'll be more than happy to discuss it with you and make sure that we come to mutual agreement if such is needed. :-) Cheers, and thanks again! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Points Oshwah at User:GeneralNotability#Modifying my administrative actions (in less vague terms - no objections and not something you even need to notify me for). This was definitely a "stop ongoing disruption as soon as possible" protection, extending it because of a long history of disruption is entirely reasonable. GeneralNotability ( talk) 21:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
GeneralNotability - Thanks for the response! I always try to reach out to the original admin if I modify an administrative action that they recently applied. However, this is good to keep in mind! Thanks again! :-D ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:GeneralNotability/spihelper-dev.js. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Look, I love edit summaries, but "deploying revision https://github.com/GeneralNotability/spihelper/commit/dda33a1fa0d0f8603d3fed4b56b683904b73a4ad dda33a1fa0d0f8603d3fed4b56b683904b73a4ad", that's just totally over the top. Drmies ( talk) 00:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

  • Oh but your dog is awesome! Never mind, I take the warning back. Drmies ( talk) 00:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Drmies, the best part is that that's entirely automatic - I have a whole setup so that every time I commit a code change, the spihelper script automatically gets updated without me doing anything. GeneralNotability ( talk) 01:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
      • Hmm your dog is not automatic, I assume. Very good dog. Kinda wondering what "committing a code change" is, and if I've ever done that. Drmies ( talk) 01:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
        Drmies, if you don't know, probably not...at least not in terms of writing code. You've done something nearly identical every time you've edited a Wikipedia article, though: "I am finished with the change I wanted to make and am ready to publish this change so that other people can see it". GeneralNotability ( talk) 02:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-40

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom EC?

Hi GN, I see you were on the ArbCom election commission last year, and are still active. The nominations for this year's EC close in 2 days, and so far we have one nomination, and they've never been on the EC before. Would you consider joining them on the nomination page? IMHO, the EC should have at least one person who has done it before, so we don't lose institutional memory, and can pass it down to newbies who join this year. So I hope you have the time and the inclination. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 22:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Floquenbeam, thanks for the note. I am aware that the EC nomination process is going on, but I figured I would step back this year since I've been on two years in a row. I see that you successfully nudged Cyberpower into running since you posted this, so I'm content that the institutional knowledge will be passed down - and worst case, I'll probably be lurking and can answer questions if needed. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Yes, I sweet-talked at least one person with previous experience, so I'm good. Wasn't looking to force every old-timer to run again - we do need new blood - but I wanted at least one. Cheers. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 14:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi GN, any chance you're still willing to run? There's a fair number of candidates, but I suspect we'd want more than just the one admin, and a functionary can only be a good thing...I'm still considering it, but I really don't want to, I have too much busy work on my hands as it is. Vanamonde ( Talk) 22:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Not this year, sorry Vanamonde. GeneralNotability ( talk) 14:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
No worries...I see Amanda has stepped up, so there will be at least two. Vanamonde ( Talk) 14:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Another sock

See this user User:Raydann contributions [5] same edits like that LTA. 110.224.21.124 ( talk) 11:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

...like which LTA? Which of their contributions should I be looking at? Be specific, please. GeneralNotability ( talk) 14:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Create Account

Hello there, This is my userpage User:PinkMelon on another project as you can see I'm an experienced editor, can I create account and start editing on here and I'm asking as you are a checkuser. 2401:4900:314A:EAC4:0:65:3844:3D01 ( talk) 16:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Weesperplein metro station and Talk:Turkish Airlines fleet on "Engineering and technology" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

An action of yours

It is not merely unfair but also nasty and sneaky to continue to allow comments in a talk page discussion where the editor whose talk page it is can not respond. DuncanHill ( talk) 22:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

DuncanHill, thank you for bringing this to my attention. To be frank, I don't care for the characterization as "nasty and sneaky" (yes, I do understand that it's intended as a reference), nor do I think that blocking someone confers a duty to referee discussions on their talk page – unless you're suggesting that I intentionally blocked BHG so that people could comment without her responding? Regardless, I see that BD2412 has asked folks to knock off the discussion (thank you for doing that, BD2412) so I don't think there is anything for me to do right now. In the future, if you see a situation like this and would like me to intervene, please feel free to let me know. GeneralNotability ( talk) 22:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
I think, with your history, you would do better to steer well clear of taking any admin actions with regard to BHG. But that aside, and I would say this to any admin about any other editor, I do think that blocking someone, anyone, from their own talk page does confer a duty, a moral one at least, to see that things do not get out of hand there. If you deprive someone of the means to defend themselves, you take on a responsibility to defend them. But I am awfully old-fashioned like that. DuncanHill ( talk) 22:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
DuncanHill I previously made a temporary incivility block against BHG which led to me being party to an ArbCom case against her and was subsequently reversed. As far as I'm aware, that's it; no back-and-forth debates, no content disputes, nothing else. I'd hardly call that a "history," and the idea that an admin blocking someone makes them INVOLVED enough to proscribe future blocks is neither supported by policy nor logical (if that were the case, admins could never make escalating blocks and would instead have to get other admins to act on their behalf). I am not going to step back from a policy-compliant administrative action just because the subject of the action or their friends have unilaterally decided that I have a "history".
As for the topic of the talk page, I did indeed have it temporarily watched, as Twinkle automatically does for everyone I block (though I didn't check every message that went through). Between my revocation and BD2412's knock-it-off comment, I see:
I see nothing "out of hand," no taunting, no gravedancing, no insults. The comments by PMC, who apparently does not get along with BHG, were made directly in response to a ping and were civil, and as far as I can tell the other comments were all well-intentioned and appropriate. If somebody had come along and started slapping insults on BHG's talk page, I could certainly understand your concerns, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Mildly, I object to the characterization that I don't get along with BHG in the sense of there being any personal history underlying my comments regarding the block. I don't think I've ever interacted with her onwiki to any significant degree - at least not that I can recall. I recused from the portals arb case because I had participated in the topic area and actually tended to agree with BHG's position on them at the time. ♠ PMC(talk) 23:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, Premeditated Chaos, I thought there was some...er...history there (heh, me incorrectly suggesting that someone has a "history" is kinda funny, given the above conversation) GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Apology not accepted, it'll be the rack for you, sir. ♠ PMC(talk) 00:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Wow. ArbCom has really mellowed out since your days on the committee, I guess. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
It's the budget cuts, no one can afford good instruments of torment these days. ♠ PMC(talk) 00:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-41

14:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #541

Template/sig question

Hey. How did you get your sig to go inside of {{ Blocked talk-revoked-notice}}? I noticed a while back that the sig=yes parameter doesn't work for it. Thanks! El_C 16:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

El_C, no idea - Twinkle does all the magic for me. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Ah, makes sense. I'm probably the only admin to only use default without anything added whatsoever (ever). El_C 00:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Editing Wikipedia be like [8]. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
El C, I use {{ subst:uw-tparevoked|sig=yes}}; see Special:Diff/1100560914. Strangely enough, I used Twinkle far more as a non-administrator compared to now. Sdrqaz ( talk) 21:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Cool, thanks Sdrqaz! I'll remember that shortcut. Very handy. El_C 04:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose ( talk) and Nick-D ( talk) 15:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello GeneralNotability/Archives/2022,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Wikidata weekly summary #542

Tech News: 2022-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected continued block evasion

Just a couple of days ago you confirmed Lmharding as a sock of Jacobkennedy here. Another user, @ UtoD, has opened a new SPI for IP 64.121.65.96 at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacobkennedy, after noticing this IP user active in the same space since Lmharding's block. Would it be appropriate for you to take a look, rather have the SPI run its course? As evidence, here are diffs of some recent edits:

There's also the IP 64.121.65.96's edit of LMH's user talk page: [13], fixing minor wiki markup errors. This IP address seems very close, to my ignorant eye, to another IP already blocked as a Jacobkennedy sock: 64.121.83.151, and this (ancient), stale DUCK: 64.121.64.15.

Then there is the currently inactive, but not blocked Ususer445. They make the same edits as LMH / Jacobkennedy / Moneyspender, as, e.g., vigilante actions, death. torture; [14]. Or inserting unsourced or SYNTH claims that antidiscrimination laws are not enforced:

Both have placed in article infoboxes claims of "forced anal exams" as penalties:

Hope it's ok to ask here, GeneralNotability; I was not entirely sure, so please excuse any missteps on my part. I read about how time-consuming SPI is to do, so am contacting you as an alternative. I am actually quite concerned that this is really a long-term situation. The older socks go back a decade, so the gap between the 2019 case and this one is unlikely to be the whole story ... In past episodes @ Drmies, @ Bonadea and @ Yamla seem to have been quite involved, so maybe they would be interested, too? (Again, apologies if this is not the correct thing to do.) I can supply more info, if needed. Thanks, AukusRuckus ( talk) 11:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

As stated in the edit message even if that user LMHarding was listed as a sock the source in this particular situation matched the edit and if it is correct WP:SOCK says that in that situation you do not revert it. Being an edit done by that is not always an auto revert. I stated this then you reverted twice with no revert message explanation. I reject your label. As for that one other edit I was watching the conversation as I was interested in watching how AukusRuckus edits to teach myself the edit tools here on Wikipedia and I happened to see an edit I tried to edit as a test edit. Please don't WP:BITETHENEWCOMER. Cheers. 64.121.65.96 ( talk) 21:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
AukusRuckus, handled, thanks for notifying me. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for taking care of that, GN. I'm sorry to say, I have another related request.
I had the user Littlepersonlavalamp (LPLL) on my radar as a JacobKennedy sock for a long time, but as they had not edited since 2018, I thought it not worth mentioning, presuming it would remain inactive, much like Ususer445.
After more than 4 years, and barely 8 hours following the removal, the account's sprung to life to reinsert the unsourced SYNTH non-penalties that I had excised from LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates. These are the same ones that LMH and socks like putting in so many articles; LMH had fought tooth and nail to keep these in the UAE article.
Since reactivating, LPLL has made 22 edits to ten different pages, as I type this. Of those 10 articles, 3 are pages recently (in the last 30 days) edited by LMH, [now five out of 12 edited pages] as shown here. Previously, I had noted similarities in LPLL's very old edits:
Is this enough evidence for you to look at them, please? AukusRuckus ( talk) 04:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Updated AukusRuckus ( talk) 04:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
AukusRuckus, well spotted.  Confirmed to Jacobkennedy. For future reference - it's best if you file cases at SPI (just for tracking purposes), but you're welcome to ping me to a case you've filed or leave me a note on my talk page. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Will do! (I may have misinterpreted the essay I was reading, "SPI is expensive" ... or possibly that is not the view of all Admins / check users.) In any case, I am very grateful: Thanks, GeneralNotability. AukusRuckus ( talk) 00:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
AukusRuckus, that's actually an essay that I fully endorse, but in this case it's pretty straightforward behaviorally and not just simple vandalism/disruption that could be handled at other venues. GeneralNotability ( talk) 01:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, GN, gotcha! I'll get there eventually in my understanding; gathering pace, as I go along! AukusRuckus ( talk) 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-43

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I got it

Hey, see this user User:Raydann is a sock Confirmed to User:Xovot same edits and doing same antivandalism work also see this [34] which is raised by an editor and he ignored. 110.224.19.116 ( talk) 08:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi @ GeneralNotability and @ 110.224.19.116. I deny any claims of me being associated with User:Xovot. If any checkuser wishes to conduct a check on me, I give my consent to it. By the way, I did answer the concern of the other editor and not 'ignored' it. Happy editing! ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 12:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I know exactly which LTA you are, IP. You are not welcome here. Raydann, ignore 'em. GeneralNotability ( talk) 15:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, will do. Didn't understand why these 2 IPs 110.224.19.116 & 223.191.2.98 targeted me specifically. ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Raydann, couldn't say for sure...probably just that you've bumped into this particular LTA before and they're trying to retaliate. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Anna Pasternak

Hello GeneralNotability,

I work for a book store and have been tasked with creating Wikipedia pages for notable authors. I was going to start with Anna Pasternak, but it seems like her page was deleted earlier due to violating Wikipedia's policies. She has many references from top publications like The Telegraph, Reuters, and The New York Times. Please let me know how I can abide by Wikipedia's policies and create pages affected with Conflict of Interest. Thank you! Forgetwords ( talk) 09:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Forgetwords, I deleted the previous draft because it was made by a long-banned paid editing firm. You are welcome to write a fresh article on Pasternak if you want. Since you say you were "tasked," I'm assuming this is part of your job, and so you are still expected to abide by our paid-editing policy, disclosing what you have been paid for and who is paying you (even if it isn't the subject of the article who's paying). GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I have declared it. I will get started. Forgetwords ( talk) 01:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good call with applying semi-protection onto this article - it was definitely needed. I wanted to give you a heads up that I went and extended the protection duration to three months. When I look back through the edit history, this exact kind of BLP libel and disruption goes back much further than today, and I felt that it was warranted. Please let me know if you have any questions, concerns, or objections to this - I'll be more than happy to discuss it with you and make sure that we come to mutual agreement if such is needed. :-) Cheers, and thanks again! ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Points Oshwah at User:GeneralNotability#Modifying my administrative actions (in less vague terms - no objections and not something you even need to notify me for). This was definitely a "stop ongoing disruption as soon as possible" protection, extending it because of a long history of disruption is entirely reasonable. GeneralNotability ( talk) 21:39, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
GeneralNotability - Thanks for the response! I always try to reach out to the original admin if I modify an administrative action that they recently applied. However, this is good to keep in mind! Thanks again! :-D ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:GeneralNotability/spihelper-dev.js. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Look, I love edit summaries, but "deploying revision https://github.com/GeneralNotability/spihelper/commit/dda33a1fa0d0f8603d3fed4b56b683904b73a4ad dda33a1fa0d0f8603d3fed4b56b683904b73a4ad", that's just totally over the top. Drmies ( talk) 00:32, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

  • Oh but your dog is awesome! Never mind, I take the warning back. Drmies ( talk) 00:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Drmies, the best part is that that's entirely automatic - I have a whole setup so that every time I commit a code change, the spihelper script automatically gets updated without me doing anything. GeneralNotability ( talk) 01:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
      • Hmm your dog is not automatic, I assume. Very good dog. Kinda wondering what "committing a code change" is, and if I've ever done that. Drmies ( talk) 01:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
        Drmies, if you don't know, probably not...at least not in terms of writing code. You've done something nearly identical every time you've edited a Wikipedia article, though: "I am finished with the change I wanted to make and am ready to publish this change so that other people can see it". GeneralNotability ( talk) 02:12, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-40

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom EC?

Hi GN, I see you were on the ArbCom election commission last year, and are still active. The nominations for this year's EC close in 2 days, and so far we have one nomination, and they've never been on the EC before. Would you consider joining them on the nomination page? IMHO, the EC should have at least one person who has done it before, so we don't lose institutional memory, and can pass it down to newbies who join this year. So I hope you have the time and the inclination. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 22:03, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Floquenbeam, thanks for the note. I am aware that the EC nomination process is going on, but I figured I would step back this year since I've been on two years in a row. I see that you successfully nudged Cyberpower into running since you posted this, so I'm content that the institutional knowledge will be passed down - and worst case, I'll probably be lurking and can answer questions if needed. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Yes, I sweet-talked at least one person with previous experience, so I'm good. Wasn't looking to force every old-timer to run again - we do need new blood - but I wanted at least one. Cheers. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 14:30, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi GN, any chance you're still willing to run? There's a fair number of candidates, but I suspect we'd want more than just the one admin, and a functionary can only be a good thing...I'm still considering it, but I really don't want to, I have too much busy work on my hands as it is. Vanamonde ( Talk) 22:41, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Not this year, sorry Vanamonde. GeneralNotability ( talk) 14:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
No worries...I see Amanda has stepped up, so there will be at least two. Vanamonde ( Talk) 14:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Another sock

See this user User:Raydann contributions [5] same edits like that LTA. 110.224.21.124 ( talk) 11:31, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

...like which LTA? Which of their contributions should I be looking at? Be specific, please. GeneralNotability ( talk) 14:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Create Account

Hello there, This is my userpage User:PinkMelon on another project as you can see I'm an experienced editor, can I create account and start editing on here and I'm asking as you are a checkuser. 2401:4900:314A:EAC4:0:65:3844:3D01 ( talk) 16:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Weesperplein metro station and Talk:Turkish Airlines fleet on "Engineering and technology" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:39, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

An action of yours

It is not merely unfair but also nasty and sneaky to continue to allow comments in a talk page discussion where the editor whose talk page it is can not respond. DuncanHill ( talk) 22:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

DuncanHill, thank you for bringing this to my attention. To be frank, I don't care for the characterization as "nasty and sneaky" (yes, I do understand that it's intended as a reference), nor do I think that blocking someone confers a duty to referee discussions on their talk page – unless you're suggesting that I intentionally blocked BHG so that people could comment without her responding? Regardless, I see that BD2412 has asked folks to knock off the discussion (thank you for doing that, BD2412) so I don't think there is anything for me to do right now. In the future, if you see a situation like this and would like me to intervene, please feel free to let me know. GeneralNotability ( talk) 22:43, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
I think, with your history, you would do better to steer well clear of taking any admin actions with regard to BHG. But that aside, and I would say this to any admin about any other editor, I do think that blocking someone, anyone, from their own talk page does confer a duty, a moral one at least, to see that things do not get out of hand there. If you deprive someone of the means to defend themselves, you take on a responsibility to defend them. But I am awfully old-fashioned like that. DuncanHill ( talk) 22:49, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
DuncanHill I previously made a temporary incivility block against BHG which led to me being party to an ArbCom case against her and was subsequently reversed. As far as I'm aware, that's it; no back-and-forth debates, no content disputes, nothing else. I'd hardly call that a "history," and the idea that an admin blocking someone makes them INVOLVED enough to proscribe future blocks is neither supported by policy nor logical (if that were the case, admins could never make escalating blocks and would instead have to get other admins to act on their behalf). I am not going to step back from a policy-compliant administrative action just because the subject of the action or their friends have unilaterally decided that I have a "history".
As for the topic of the talk page, I did indeed have it temporarily watched, as Twinkle automatically does for everyone I block (though I didn't check every message that went through). Between my revocation and BD2412's knock-it-off comment, I see:
I see nothing "out of hand," no taunting, no gravedancing, no insults. The comments by PMC, who apparently does not get along with BHG, were made directly in response to a ping and were civil, and as far as I can tell the other comments were all well-intentioned and appropriate. If somebody had come along and started slapping insults on BHG's talk page, I could certainly understand your concerns, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Mildly, I object to the characterization that I don't get along with BHG in the sense of there being any personal history underlying my comments regarding the block. I don't think I've ever interacted with her onwiki to any significant degree - at least not that I can recall. I recused from the portals arb case because I had participated in the topic area and actually tended to agree with BHG's position on them at the time. ♠ PMC(talk) 23:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Apologies, Premeditated Chaos, I thought there was some...er...history there (heh, me incorrectly suggesting that someone has a "history" is kinda funny, given the above conversation) GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Apology not accepted, it'll be the rack for you, sir. ♠ PMC(talk) 00:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Wow. ArbCom has really mellowed out since your days on the committee, I guess. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
It's the budget cuts, no one can afford good instruments of torment these days. ♠ PMC(talk) 00:58, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-41

14:06, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #541

Template/sig question

Hey. How did you get your sig to go inside of {{ Blocked talk-revoked-notice}}? I noticed a while back that the sig=yes parameter doesn't work for it. Thanks! El_C 16:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

El_C, no idea - Twinkle does all the magic for me. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Ah, makes sense. I'm probably the only admin to only use default without anything added whatsoever (ever). El_C 00:33, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Editing Wikipedia be like [8]. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 00:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
El C, I use {{ subst:uw-tparevoked|sig=yes}}; see Special:Diff/1100560914. Strangely enough, I used Twinkle far more as a non-administrator compared to now. Sdrqaz ( talk) 21:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Cool, thanks Sdrqaz! I'll remember that shortcut. Very handy. El_C 04:42, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose ( talk) and Nick-D ( talk) 15:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello GeneralNotability/Archives/2022,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Wikidata weekly summary #542

Tech News: 2022-42

MediaWiki message delivery 21:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected continued block evasion

Just a couple of days ago you confirmed Lmharding as a sock of Jacobkennedy here. Another user, @ UtoD, has opened a new SPI for IP 64.121.65.96 at WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacobkennedy, after noticing this IP user active in the same space since Lmharding's block. Would it be appropriate for you to take a look, rather have the SPI run its course? As evidence, here are diffs of some recent edits:

There's also the IP 64.121.65.96's edit of LMH's user talk page: [13], fixing minor wiki markup errors. This IP address seems very close, to my ignorant eye, to another IP already blocked as a Jacobkennedy sock: 64.121.83.151, and this (ancient), stale DUCK: 64.121.64.15.

Then there is the currently inactive, but not blocked Ususer445. They make the same edits as LMH / Jacobkennedy / Moneyspender, as, e.g., vigilante actions, death. torture; [14]. Or inserting unsourced or SYNTH claims that antidiscrimination laws are not enforced:

Both have placed in article infoboxes claims of "forced anal exams" as penalties:

Hope it's ok to ask here, GeneralNotability; I was not entirely sure, so please excuse any missteps on my part. I read about how time-consuming SPI is to do, so am contacting you as an alternative. I am actually quite concerned that this is really a long-term situation. The older socks go back a decade, so the gap between the 2019 case and this one is unlikely to be the whole story ... In past episodes @ Drmies, @ Bonadea and @ Yamla seem to have been quite involved, so maybe they would be interested, too? (Again, apologies if this is not the correct thing to do.) I can supply more info, if needed. Thanks, AukusRuckus ( talk) 11:12, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

As stated in the edit message even if that user LMHarding was listed as a sock the source in this particular situation matched the edit and if it is correct WP:SOCK says that in that situation you do not revert it. Being an edit done by that is not always an auto revert. I stated this then you reverted twice with no revert message explanation. I reject your label. As for that one other edit I was watching the conversation as I was interested in watching how AukusRuckus edits to teach myself the edit tools here on Wikipedia and I happened to see an edit I tried to edit as a test edit. Please don't WP:BITETHENEWCOMER. Cheers. 64.121.65.96 ( talk) 21:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
AukusRuckus, handled, thanks for notifying me. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks very much for taking care of that, GN. I'm sorry to say, I have another related request.
I had the user Littlepersonlavalamp (LPLL) on my radar as a JacobKennedy sock for a long time, but as they had not edited since 2018, I thought it not worth mentioning, presuming it would remain inactive, much like Ususer445.
After more than 4 years, and barely 8 hours following the removal, the account's sprung to life to reinsert the unsourced SYNTH non-penalties that I had excised from LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates. These are the same ones that LMH and socks like putting in so many articles; LMH had fought tooth and nail to keep these in the UAE article.
Since reactivating, LPLL has made 22 edits to ten different pages, as I type this. Of those 10 articles, 3 are pages recently (in the last 30 days) edited by LMH, [now five out of 12 edited pages] as shown here. Previously, I had noted similarities in LPLL's very old edits:
Is this enough evidence for you to look at them, please? AukusRuckus ( talk) 04:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Updated AukusRuckus ( talk) 04:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
AukusRuckus, well spotted.  Confirmed to Jacobkennedy. For future reference - it's best if you file cases at SPI (just for tracking purposes), but you're welcome to ping me to a case you've filed or leave me a note on my talk page. GeneralNotability ( talk) 00:17, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Will do! (I may have misinterpreted the essay I was reading, "SPI is expensive" ... or possibly that is not the view of all Admins / check users.) In any case, I am very grateful: Thanks, GeneralNotability. AukusRuckus ( talk) 00:55, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
AukusRuckus, that's actually an essay that I fully endorse, but in this case it's pretty straightforward behaviorally and not just simple vandalism/disruption that could be handled at other venues. GeneralNotability ( talk) 01:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, GN, gotcha! I'll get there eventually in my understanding; gathering pace, as I go along! AukusRuckus ( talk) 01:09, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-43

MediaWiki message delivery 21:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I got it

Hey, see this user User:Raydann is a sock Confirmed to User:Xovot same edits and doing same antivandalism work also see this [34] which is raised by an editor and he ignored. 110.224.19.116 ( talk) 08:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi @ GeneralNotability and @ 110.224.19.116. I deny any claims of me being associated with User:Xovot. If any checkuser wishes to conduct a check on me, I give my consent to it. By the way, I did answer the concern of the other editor and not 'ignored' it. Happy editing! ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 12:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I know exactly which LTA you are, IP. You are not welcome here. Raydann, ignore 'em. GeneralNotability ( talk) 15:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, will do. Didn't understand why these 2 IPs 110.224.19.116 & 223.191.2.98 targeted me specifically. ❯❯❯ Raydann (Talk) 16:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Raydann, couldn't say for sure...probably just that you've bumped into this particular LTA before and they're trying to retaliate. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:40, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Anna Pasternak

Hello GeneralNotability,

I work for a book store and have been tasked with creating Wikipedia pages for notable authors. I was going to start with Anna Pasternak, but it seems like her page was deleted earlier due to violating Wikipedia's policies. She has many references from top publications like The Telegraph, Reuters, and The New York Times. Please let me know how I can abide by Wikipedia's policies and create pages affected with Conflict of Interest. Thank you! Forgetwords ( talk) 09:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Forgetwords, I deleted the previous draft because it was made by a long-banned paid editing firm. You are welcome to write a fresh article on Pasternak if you want. Since you say you were "tasked," I'm assuming this is part of your job, and so you are still expected to abide by our paid-editing policy, disclosing what you have been paid for and who is paying you (even if it isn't the subject of the article who's paying). GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I have declared it. I will get started. Forgetwords ( talk) 01:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook