This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I had to request a non-controversial technical move request in order to move your main article on the program over the redirect to a shorter section in the history. You and I should watch for non-controversial administrator action. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Robert McClenon: Thanks for that. ;-) I was about to request such a move myself. Epic Genius ( talk) 18:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:SAS 1972 tunnel.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

In response to your comment on my talk page (about this file)

No worries. In fact, for me, doing work in the "File:" namespace is a new field for me altogether, but I hope that I'm doing "okay". :) Anyways, I'd still worry that the file's placement in Second Avenue Subway since its placement in that article was actually why I placed the tag, given that it is rather unclear by its placement location what its purpose is to illustrate to readers that cannot be sufficiently represented by text (specifically WP:NFCCP point 8, and WP:NFCI point 9 are my main concerns.) Steel1943 ( talk) 19:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Steel1943: The point of the image in that article, actually, is to show what the tunnel segments look like, since there aren't any reliable sources that describe that tunnel in detail. It's described as simply a "tunnel". With the image, you can see that there are beams in the walls and that the walls are flat (as opposed to round) for example. Epic Genius ( talk) 20:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm not making joke edits. I'm seriously surprised at how someone can be afraid of everything, so I'm making fun of the phobia itself because, how to panphobes even live? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydra Virus ( talk • contribs) 20:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Hydra Virus: I'm also surprised about the phobia itself, and I can't believe that even exists. However, Wikipedia is not the place for opinions like this. Everything has to be absolutely 99.99999...% unbiased. I don't like it either, but well.

However, if there is proof that a lot of people are surprised about the existence of panphobes, you can add a statement saying so, as well as a reliable source to support it. Epic Genius ( talk) 02:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hydra Virus In addition to what Epic Genius noted above, we are not interested in your personal observations, quips, queries, ruminations, musings, etc. Statements like "and we don't know how these people even live" are completely useless from an academic perspective. Just because you don't understand something doesn't grant you license to wonder aloud in an academic article. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

You know what? F*CK PANPHOBES!!!! I can talk sh*t about them if I want! This place is a lie, anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hydra Virus ( talk • contribs) 22:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Oh well, it was worth a shot. Epic Genius ( talk) 22:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Epic; You appear to want to nominate the new WTC page for GA assessment. When I read through the page I noticed that one of the sections in the article was just marked as being unfinished. Also, after reading the recent article about World Trade Center Transportation Hub dealing with Calatrava and cost over-runs in New York Magazine recently, it appears that there is no separate section in the article discussing the Spiraling costs, which continue to grow. Does this sound like something you are interested in looking at? MusicAngels ( talk) 19:41, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

@ MusicAngels: Yes, an addition like that would be interesting. Thank you for your feedback. I've withdrawn the GAN for now, but I'll re-add it once the appropriate text is added. Epic Genius ( talk) 19:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Trade Center (2001–present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westfield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your edits over the past 24 hours. I couldn't figure out what was going on there (the boroughs table was placed in duplicate, if you had noticed!) amidst the mess, so I had reverted back to status quo, but these subsequent edits make much more sense. Best, Castncoot ( talk) 16:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Castncoot: No problem. This weird layout came about because @ Facts707 wanted the boro navbox on top. It looked weird there, so I placed it on the bottom (of course, I didn't know the boro navbox was duplicated). Anyway, thank you, as well, for your assumption of good faith. Epic Genius ( talk) 16:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I figured as much, thank you. Castncoot ( talk) 00:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

This note is only delivered to English Wikipedia subscribers of the visual editor's newsletter.

The location of the visual editor's preference has been changed from the "Beta" tab to the "Editing" section of your preferences on this wiki. The setting now says Temporarily disable the visual editor while it is in beta. This aligns en.wiki with almost all the other WMF wikis; it doesn’t mean the visual editor is complete, or that it is no longer “in beta phase” though.

This action has not changed anything else for editors: it still honours editors’ previous choices about having it on or off; logged-out users continue to only have access to wikitext; the “Edit” tab is still after the “Edit source” one. You can learn more at the visual editor’s talk page.

We don’t expect this to cause any glitches, but in case your account no longer has the settings that you want, please accept our apologies and correct it in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences. Thank you for your attention, Elitre (WMF) -16:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I hate to be disagreeable with such an agreeable person as you, EG. I am not a regular "badger" of oppose votes, but it deeply offends my sense of honor and fair play when an administrator engages in a calculated "hit" on an RfA candidate, making exaggerated claims of racism and racial insensitivity, as well as alleging violations and ignorance of policies and guidelines by the candidate that they themselves misrepresent, misunderstand or ignore. The fact that the chief oppose voter engaged in impermissible canvassing (and arguably personal attacks, too) in order to achieve his preferred outcome in a page move discussion, and then attempted to blame the RfA candidate for ignorance of policy and a failure to accept a slim "consensus" obtained by canvassing is really among the most egregious RfA misconduct I have witnessed in my 6+ years on-wiki. I don't know any of the parties, but I am genuinely angry that this type of gamesmanship is still considered to be acceptable conduct at RfA. And it's worse because two administrators are at the heart of it, and worse yet because it works. At some point, the scorched-earth RfA tactics need to stop, and people who attempt them need to be held publicly accountable. My 2 cents worth.

I hope we cross paths under happier circumstances next time. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 18:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment, Dirtlawyer1. I don't think we were particularly in disagreement on this RfA, but it's just that we may have had different opinions on the RfA opponents, which is allowed. FWIW, I share some of your sentiments about these oppose comments in particular. Regards, Epic Genius ( talk) 19:08, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

We all need to endeavor to be better at disagreeing without being disagreeable, but it's damn difficult to do when someone else is willing to take a metaphorical meat cleaver to an RfA candidate who can't really defend themselves. This one's on me, and I sincerely apologize for any offense given. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 19:13, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

None taken. (And this is why I don't keep meat cleavers. (Couldn't resist. )) Epic Genius ( talk) 19:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Thursday October 15: Women in Architecture Edit-a-thon @ Guggenheim

You are invited to join us for a full afternoon and evening of social Wikipedia editing at the Guggenheim (drop-in any time, noon-8pm!), during which we will create, update, and improve Wikipedia articles covering the lives and works of women in architecture. Saturday October 15 Women in Architecture Edit-a-thon @ Guggenheim ( RSVP on-wiki or at meetup.com). noon - 8pm (drop-in anytime!) at Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Garrett Lobby @ 1071 5th Ave by E 88 St In conjunction with Archtober and New York Archives Week, the Guggenheim will host its third Wikipedia edit-a-thon—or, #guggathon— to enhance articles related to women in architecture on Wikipedia. The Guggenheim aims to further the goals of Ada Lovelace Day for STEM, and Art+Feminism for art, in a field that, by its nature combines both. The Guggenheim will work alongside ArchiteXX, the founders of WikiD: Women Wikipedia Design #wikiD, the international education and advocacy program working to increase the number of Wikipedia articles on women in architecture and the built environment. New and experienced editors are welcome. Can’t join us in New York? Visit our global partnerships page to discover an edit-a-thon in a city near you or simply join remotely. We hope to see you there!-- Pharos ( talk) 19:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Epicgenius, would you mind taking a look at the Taipei 101 article and my individual reassessment at Talk:Taipei 101/GA1? I am asking for your advice because of your work with architecture articles. sst ✈ 10:21, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

@ SSTflyer: I'll try to take a look at it later. Epic Genius ( talk) 12:25, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I'll respond in a bit, once I formulate a proper response, but I don't especially object to the use of the phrasing "Queens, New York", hence my moves. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Ser Amantio di Nicolao: Thank you for your note. I take it that you support the status quo? Epic Genius ( talk) 23:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

I think so, yes. It's not perfect, but I've been mulling it over, and I can't see any other option that I think is better. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Alright, cool, thanks. Epic Genius ( talk) 12:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Please see my reply in response to your comment, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise.

One simply has to alter the search parameters and not just only search for the exact specific name, but also related keywords.

Thank you,

— Cirt ( talk) 17:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Cirt: Thanks for your note. I'll look there. In addition, thank you for your work on the article. Epic Genius ( talk) 17:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I admit that it is a bit frustrating to find that some folks have difficulty changing their opinions after the amount of research I've put into it. And the amount of secondary sources call it "best of all time", etc. And that they feel the need to reply in threaded responses, multiple times, to people voting opposite from their view, again and again. It is a bit disconcerting, especially in the face of the sheer volume of research I've attempted to carry out. I hope you can understand? — Cirt ( talk) 17:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I do. You carry out all this research, and then some people want to delete it anyway. I can see. Epic Genius ( talk) 17:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Let me know if you want help verifying my research, JSTOR, etc. Your kind words are most appreciated, — Cirt ( talk) 17:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Or if you have any ideas, perhaps, of anything else I can do at this point in time after this amount of research to further address notability? Have I done that already? Have I done enough research and expansion and writing and Quality improvement efforts to demonstrate that? Do I have to do more? — Cirt ( talk) 18:03, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Cirt: I don't know, exactly, what you can do right now, other than wait for the AFD to conclude so you can get your good article nomination reviewed. (Have you checked other repositories like HighBeam Research?) Epic Genius ( talk) 20:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, I've checked HighBeam and added more information. Like Shatner saying he preferred Belushi's impression of himself -- to his own later one that he did on SNL. I've also added a new subsection, Impact on Star Trek, on how the sketch itself later affected the cast and crew. — Cirt ( talk) 20:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Cool. Is there anything else I can do to help? Epic Genius ( talk) 20:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

No idea. I'm quite confused as to how to persuade a couple people this is notable -- especially after all the research I've already done to demonstrate that effectively by improving the article, itself. If you've got any ideas, I'm all ears. — Cirt ( talk) 20:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

In the future, I highly suggest taking up an interest in Star Wars and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert instead of Star Trek and SNL. Yes?

(But in all seriousness, it looks like the snowball clause applies here and that the AFD will probably close as "snow keep." Epic Genius ( talk) 20:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Snow would be nice. But also it would be nice to allow it to run the full length of time as normal, so that there will be a final definitive decision and it hopefully would never have to go to AFD again in the future. I happen to like both Star Wars and Star Trek, and all things Colbert. ;) — Cirt ( talk) 20:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I think if it runs the full length, most people will probably !vote to keep anyway. Also, me too. I love Star Wars and Stephen Colbert. Epic Genius ( talk) 22:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Update: I've posted a 2nd Update at the bottom of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise -- does that seem to make things clearer? — Cirt ( talk) 22:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, it does. That post really helps future !voters understand the current context of the AFD. Epic Genius ( talk) 22:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I hope so. :) — Cirt ( talk) 22:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 02:01, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brooklyn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [Kingsborough Community College] is a junior college in the [[City University of New York]] system, located in [[Manhattan Beach,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 03:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Legobot ( talk) 00:03, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

In addition, I will be telling that we are going to have Semi Protection for Amos Yee to prevent from vandalism. This is to cause him not to get upset.

Please use Semi-Protection instead of Full Protection so easier for User accounts to update.

Unsigned comment by 119.74.47.12 at 20:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.47.12 ( talk)

@ 119.74.47.12: I am not an admin. The request is supposed to be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Epic Genius ( talk) 14:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I think you made a mistake with something. If you go on the MTA webpage and click future dates, you can see the information saying that Atlantic AV is closed. As for the information, if you take a look at the Van Sicklen Av page, the author has written exactly what I wrote, although his information wasn't removed. As for the Broadway Junction page, Atlantic AV needs to be put in as "CLOSED". Sutter AV needs to be put as the next stop. AahdTahar ( talk) 20:56, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

@ AahdTahar: Whoever wrote the text at Van Siclen Avenue (IRT New Lots Line) supported their claim with a reference; did not add "alternate routes"; and did not add "Closed" to this stop. Anyway, this closure is not so important that it warrants removal on the adjacent stations (unlike at Cortlandt Street (IRT Broadway – Seventh Avenue Line), where the closure is occurring for a very long time).

Also, I don't see anything here. Epic Genius ( talk) 21:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Epicgenius: Here is the link for the information, http://travel.mtanyct.info/serviceadvisory/routeStatusResult.aspx?tag=ALL&date=10/13/2015&time=&method=getstatus4, can I add back the station closed information? AahdTahar ( talk) 22:31, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

First of all, that's not my name. Second, I think that's a good source, but we should only put it in when the station actually closes (there will be a press release for that). Epic Genius ( talk) 00:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Kew Gardens 613: Thank you for fixing my username, but I think AahdTahar needs to know how my name is really spelled ;) Epic Genius ( talk) 01:33, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waldorf Astoria New York, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portlandia and Adam Scott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I had only meant to revert his other edit, not that one. Good catch. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 13:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Made three edits today at Manhattan Valley which I think are noncontroversial, but you've done such extensive good work on the piece that I wanted to give a specific head's up. Fun fact: I lived there from 1995 to 2008! -- Tenebrae ( talk) 17:43, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Tenebrae: Thanks for your edits to that article. Also, it's pretty cool that you lived there for 13 years. I hope you didn't meet any drug dealers or anything ;) (Fun fact: Never been there in my life.) Epic Genius ( talk) 18:16, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Second Avenue (IND Sixth Avenue Line). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 07:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

@ MSGJ: I'd never thought I say this, but thank you for the block. It really helped me understand what not to do in the future if I get into editing disputes. epic genius ( talk) 13:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to bother you again :p. I was wondering why the J/Z page doesn't have the R143 listed as a current rolling stock, since R143's operate almost all of the time on the J/Z. AahdTahar ( talk) 15:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

@ AahdTahar: There isn't a source for the R143s according to thejoekorner.com. Also, maybe the R143s are only used on off peak hours? epic genius ( talk) 13:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You recently reformatted the references in Death of Marilyn Monroe. I appreciate this a lot, but it seems that in the process several footnotes have gone missing. Would you be so kind as to restore them? TrueHeartSusie3 ( talk) 19:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3

@ TrueHeartSusie3: Thanks for your note. I just combined the references so that there is a reference for every two statements rather than for every statement if the references for the adjacent sentences are the same. I will restore them if you want, though. Are you sure you want me to restore the references? epic genius ( talk) 13:32, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Yes, because at the moment it looks like the page contains unsourced claims, which is definitely not the case. It would be great if you could restore the footnotes where they are missing; however, it's of course not preferable to go back to the old reference style, so I don't mean you should completely undo your edits. TrueHeartSusie3 ( talk) 13:41, 21 October 2015 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3

OK, thanks. I will change them later today, when I have time. epic genius ( talk) 13:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! TrueHeartSusie3 ( talk) 13:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)TrueHeartSusie3

Thank you for your kind words about my Quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia, in your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise.

A couple updates:

1. The discussion closed as Keep.

2. The Wikipedia article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is now rated Good Article quality.

Thanks again ever so much for acknowledging my efforts to improve the Quality of articles on Wikipedia in this manner.

— Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Cirt: Congratulations on your successful GA! I hope you can take it to FA status in the future. And thanks for the cute kitten! epic genius ( talk) 03:22, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

You're most welcome ! I hope to do so. It's quite fun taking something from WP:AFD --> WP:GA --> WP:FA. :) Hopefully I'll have time to take it there, — Cirt ( talk) 03:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Cool. Let me know if I can help. And good luck on your quest to improve the article to FA. epic genius ( talk) 03:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I have apparently been notified by User:Bagumba that you or another editor objects to my proposed edit for the Brooklyn Nets article. I am proposing to change the link in the |location= field from New York City, New York to New York City, New York. I am trying to reach consensus with other editors as to the link in that particular field of the infobox in the article. Specifically, I am requesting to find out what can happen to reach WP:CONSENSUS. Charlesaaronthompson ( talk) 07:42, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Charlesaaronthompson: I would be happy to weight in so we can reach consensus. By the way, I don;t object to your edits; I personally prefer New York City, New York, but apparently others object under other grounds. epic genius ( talk) 12:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Wednesday October 28, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our evening "WikiWednesday" salon and knowledge-sharing workshop by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. This month, we will also host a Newcomer's Wiki Workshop for those getting started on the encyclopedia project! We will also include a look at our annual plan and budget ideas, to see if the chapter is able to fiscally sponsor more ongoing projects tied to our core mission of expanding and diversifying free knowledge. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming editathons, and other outreach activities. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery! Wednesday October WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC ( RSVP on-wiki or at meetup.com). 7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! -- Pharos ( talk) 17:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC) Bonus events, RSVP now for our latest upcoming editathons: October 25 - AfroCROWD + DAWN @ Brooklyn Public Library November 4 - Aphra Behn Society @ Grand Summit Hotel (Summit, NJ) November 10 - Basquiat: Still Fly 55 @ MoMA

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

There's this guy who keeps trying to argue with me on the R160 page, and I cant seem to get to his talk page. The whole point of the R179 order is to replace the R32 and R42 cars right, which means the (C) (J) AND (Z) will get R179's, yet he thinks that the R179's are going to the (J) only. Help? AahdTahar ( talk) 12:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

@ AahdTahar: I will reword it. But actually, we don't know where the R179s will go yet, or even if the C/J/Z are getting them in the first place. It may very well go to the M train because of CBTC installation. epic genius ( talk) 13:16, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, why have you been moving all New York City Subway station layouts near the tops of each article? --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 02:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

@ DanTD: Actually, I moved the text down so the table of the station's layout and the actual information about the station are in the same place. Also, I've been working on refining the image layouts and time legends for each article, and updating nycsubway.org's dead links. epic genius ( talk) 02:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Lots Avenue (IRT New Lots Line), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Station house. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Dollar vans in New York City, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon ( talk) 01:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Robert McClenon: Cool, thanks. epic genius ( talk) 01:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey, my bad for bothering you again. I wanted to update the R110A page to reflect which cars are pump trains and which cars are still non-converted, like this:

The unconverted R110A A-cars, 8001, 8005-8006, and 8010, are stored in 207 Street Yard. Plans for these cars are unknown; however, it is known that 8005 has had its interior completely stripped of parts, while 8001 and 8006 are missing various components, leaving only one R110A car intact, which is 8010. ^[1]

The current known status of various cars are below:

• 8001 - Missing various components, remains in 207 St Yard.
• 8002-8004 - Converted to Pump Trains and renamed P8002-P8004. It is currently stored at 207 St Yard.
• 8005 - Completely stripped of parts, remains in 207 St Yard. Future plans for this car are unknown.
• 8006 - Missing various components, remains in 207 St Yard.
• 8007-8009 - Converted to Pump Trains and renamed P8007-P8009. It is currently stored at 207 St Yard.
• 8010 - Remains in its original condition in 207 St Yard, future plans for this car are unknown.

And also, I believe that a new sub section should be added to the R110A page on their conversions, like this:

The R110A's remained in service until 1999, where they were transported back and forth between yards and stored until 2013, when the MTA decided to convert the B-cars to Pump/Reach cars. Cars 8002-8004 were converted to pump cars in 2013 until summer 2014, while 8007-8009 were converted in the fall 2014. This displaced 8001, 8005-8006, and 8010 throughout 207 St Yard. 8005 was completely stripped of parts to become a pump train as well, however, the conversion process was stopped sometime in 2014, and 8005 remains stripped of parts in 207 St Yard. The plans for this car are unknown as of October 2015. 8001 and 8006 are missing various components for them to run correctly, and are currently stored in 207 St Yard. The seats from 8002-8004 and 8007-8009 were sold off on the MTA collectibles website in 2014.

Comments

What do you think? (And the picture I haven't uploaded yet) AahdTahar ( talk) 14:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

@ AahdTahar: I think this would be an OK addition if you have the references. epic genius ( talk) 15:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC) epic genius ( talk) 18:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Apologies for the undiscussed page move; I did not realize that the disambiguation is necessary. Fixed the mess now. sst✈ discuss 00:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

@ sst: It's OK. And thanks for the pie! ;) epic genius ( talk) 00:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

And to anyone else who happens to be reading: the page in question is Dollar vans in the New York metropolitan area. epic genius ( talk) 00:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

You can use the visual editor on smartphones and tablets.

Click the pencil icon to open the editor for a page. Inside that, use the gear menu in the upper right corner to "Switch to visual editing".

The editing button will remember which editing environment you used last time, and give you the same one next time. The desktop site will be switching to a system similar to this one in the coming months.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs, added new features, and made some small design changes. They post weekly status reports  on mediawiki.org. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for languages like Japanese and Arabic, making it easier to edit on mobile devices, and providing rich-media tools for formulæ, charts, galleries and uploading.

Recent improvements

Educational features: The first time you use the visual editor, it now draws your attention to the Link and ⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽ tools. When you click on the tools, it explains why you should use them. ( T108620) Alongside this, the welcome message for new users has been simplified to make editing more welcoming. ( T112354) More in-software educational features are planned.

Links:  It is now easier to understand when you are adding text to a link and when you are typing plain text next to it. ( T74108,  T91285) The editor now fully supports ISBN, PMID or RFC numbers. ( T109498, T110347, T63558)  These "magic links" use a custom link editing tool.

Uploads:  Registered editors can now upload images and other media to Commons while editing. Click the new tab in the "Insert Images and media" tool. You will be guided through the process without having to leave your edit. At the end, the image will be inserted. This tool is limited to one file at a time, owned by the user, and licensed under Commons's standard license. For more complex situations, the tool links to more advanced upload tools. You can also drag the image into the editor. This will be available in the wikitext editor later.

Mobile:  Previously, the visual editor was available on the mobile Wikipedia site only on tablets. Now, editors can use the visual editor on any size of device. ( T85630)  Edit conflicts were previously broken on the mobile website. Edit conflicts can now be resolved in both wikitext and visual editors. ( T111894) Sometimes templates and similar items could not be deleted on the mobile website. Selecting them caused the on-screen keyboard to hide with some browsers. Now there is a new "Delete" button, so that these things can be removed if the keyboard hides. ( T62110) You can also edit table cells in mobile now.

Rich editing tools:  You can now add and edit sheet music in the visual editor. ( T112925)  There are separate tabs for advanced options, such as MIDI and Ogg audio files. ( T114227 and  T113354)  When editing formulæ and other blocks, errors are shown as you edit. It is also possible to edit some types of graphs; adding new ones, and support for new types, will be coming.

On the English Wikipedia, the visual editor is now automatically available to anyone who creates an account. The preference switch was moved to the normal location, under Special:Preferences.

Future changes

You will soon be able to switch from the wikitext to the visual editor after you start editing. ( T49779) Previously, you could only switch from the visual editor to the wikitext editor. Bi-directional switching will make possible a single edit tab. ( T102398) This project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab, similar to the system already used on the mobile website. The "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time.

Let's work together

• Share your ideas and ask questions at  mw:VisualEditor/Feedback. This feedback page uses Flow for discussions.
• Can you read and type in Korean or Japanese? Language engineer  David Chan needs people who know which tools people use to type in some languages. If you speak Japanese or Korean, you can help him test support for these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help, and report it on Phabricator ( Korean - Japanese) or on Wikipedia ( Korean - Japanese).
• Local admins can set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki. If you need help, then please post a request in the Citoid project on Phabricator. Include links to the TemplateData for the most important citation templates on your wiki.
• The weekly task triage meetings are open to volunteers. Learn how to join the meetings and how to nominate bugs at  mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. You do not need to attend the meeting to nominate a bug for consideration, though. Instead, go to Phabricator and "associate" the main VisualEditor project with the bug.

If you can't read this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the  Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

— Whatamidoing (WMF) 04:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey, so, there's a user who keeps editing Bus depots of MTA Regional Bus Operations, I believe in good faith. But, he/she/it for what ever reason keeps removing/moving references and citations, and adding images that have been deemed copyright infringement (or just not fair use). So, i'm not sure what to do; I had to cumbersomely rework the page last night / this morning, and I kinda don't want to do that again. Tdorante10 ( talk) 08:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Tdorante10: I'll probably warn the user later today. But I think what you should do is to revert to the revision before the user's edits. You go to the history, click on the "diff" of the revision before the user's edits, click "edit" on the left side, and save the page. epic genius ( talk) 11:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't understand the motive for reverting these edits. Jolly Ω Janner 21:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

@ Jolly Janner: It looks like a mistake; I will revert it. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. epic genius ( talk) 21:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

The reason for that edit is that http://tobaccoatlas.org/uploads/Images/PDFs/TA4_pdf_world_tables.pdf produces a "404 Not Found" error. 87.102.44.18 ( talk) 00:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. The article exists on Internet Archive, though. epic genius ( talk) 00:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Glad it's cleared up. Jolly Ω Janner 00:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, why have you been hiding the National Register of Historic Places parameters in the infobox of the IRT White Plains Road Line platforms section of 149th Street – Grand Concourse (New York City Subway) station article? That section is on the NRHP. --------- User:DanTD ( talk) 23:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

@ DanTD: It looks like the addition of the station service legend had broken the code. In any case, I've fixed it. My apologies for any misunderstanding. epic genius ( talk) 23:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)