Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Science fiction does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
JohnBlackburne
words
deeds 14:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Mean as custard (
talk) 13:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Transgender has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Transgender was changed by Dhksml1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866201 on 2018-04-02T07:14:31+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Follow-up comment: I reported a false positive to ClueBot NG. This edit did not appear to be vandalism, although the grammar and wording were so poor that it deserved a revert, so I did not restore it. Mathglot ( talk) 21:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Your addition to
Mars has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
John of Reading (
talk) 07:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Cho Chan-ho. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
John of Reading (
talk) 07:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kim Sang-kyung.
John of Reading (
talk) 11:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mathglot. I wanted to let you know that
your edit of March 26 at
Papilloma was undone because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Mathglot (
talk) 03:16, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
It seems a lot of your edits are being reverted because you are not adding proper references. You also have to carefully read the article to ensure you are not duplicating existing references, and that your edits are on topic and in good English grammar. Please be more careful with your edits! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I just saw that you added information to Yoo Jin-seo's article about her marriage. In your edit, you stated they “held a private wedding last year”. I’ve changed your wording from “last year” to “in 2017”, and in future please state the year rather than using “last year” as readers aren’t likely to read the source or look into the article history to see when this information was written, and therefore could be reading the article in 2020 and then last year would be 2019 and not 2017. I only knew myself because I checked the source. Thanks, Alexanderlee ( talk) 02:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dhksml1, thank you for your efforts to add more images to Wikipedia articles. However, images should usually be placed in some context with nearby text to increase readers' understanding. Merely decorative images without context and additional relevant visual information should be avoided. Also, if a similar image is already placed somewhere else in the article, we usually don't add a second image with duplicate visual information in other sections. If you like to read more detailed descriptions about these aspects, please see WP:MOSIMAGES (for images) and WP:CAPTION (for image captions). I hope these tips are helpful, but please feel free to ask if you have any further questions - I'd be glad to help. WP:Teahouse is also a good forum if you have any other Wikipedia-related question or need advice about any problems. Best regards. GermanJoe ( talk) 15:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Good job leaving me a message on my talk page! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Science fiction does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
JohnBlackburne
words
deeds 14:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mean as custard. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Mean as custard (
talk) 13:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Transgender has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Transgender was changed by Dhksml1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866201 on 2018-04-02T07:14:31+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
- Follow-up comment: I reported a false positive to ClueBot NG. This edit did not appear to be vandalism, although the grammar and wording were so poor that it deserved a revert, so I did not restore it. Mathglot ( talk) 21:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Your addition to
Mars has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
John of Reading (
talk) 07:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Cho Chan-ho. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
John of Reading (
talk) 07:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kim Sang-kyung.
John of Reading (
talk) 11:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mathglot. I wanted to let you know that
your edit of March 26 at
Papilloma was undone because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Mathglot (
talk) 03:16, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
It seems a lot of your edits are being reverted because you are not adding proper references. You also have to carefully read the article to ensure you are not duplicating existing references, and that your edits are on topic and in good English grammar. Please be more careful with your edits! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:43, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I just saw that you added information to Yoo Jin-seo's article about her marriage. In your edit, you stated they “held a private wedding last year”. I’ve changed your wording from “last year” to “in 2017”, and in future please state the year rather than using “last year” as readers aren’t likely to read the source or look into the article history to see when this information was written, and therefore could be reading the article in 2020 and then last year would be 2019 and not 2017. I only knew myself because I checked the source. Thanks, Alexanderlee ( talk) 02:26, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello Dhksml1, thank you for your efforts to add more images to Wikipedia articles. However, images should usually be placed in some context with nearby text to increase readers' understanding. Merely decorative images without context and additional relevant visual information should be avoided. Also, if a similar image is already placed somewhere else in the article, we usually don't add a second image with duplicate visual information in other sections. If you like to read more detailed descriptions about these aspects, please see WP:MOSIMAGES (for images) and WP:CAPTION (for image captions). I hope these tips are helpful, but please feel free to ask if you have any further questions - I'd be glad to help. WP:Teahouse is also a good forum if you have any other Wikipedia-related question or need advice about any problems. Best regards. GermanJoe ( talk) 15:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Good job leaving me a message on my talk page! -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)