Welcome ChandlerMinh!
I'm Rasnaboy, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive
edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely,
Rasnaboy (
talk) 06:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Rigveda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Removing the word "probably" created a major misrepesentation of the text. Please don't do this again. The link was there for you to click on, I can't imagine why you didn't check first.
Doug Weller
talk 16:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
|
For helping to remove vandalism from 2020 JNU Attack DBig Xrayᗙ 13:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
Opindia is not a WP:reliable source. Please do not use it on Wikipedia. I have removed it.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 13:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mamankam festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Logan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello ChandlerMinh,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aileena Catherin Amon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Akhiljaxxn ( talk) 17:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Shaheen Bagh protests, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 17:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Please make sure your edit works! With the template:Infobox comics character, you used the parameter "native_name" which does not seem to be a valid parameter and wasn't showing in the infobox. I moved "ഡിങ്കൻ" to the character_name parameter and it now shows up under the name Dinkan. BTW- I accidentally clicked "Publish" instead of "Preview" and had to fix a couple of things... Cheers 2606:6000:CB81:1700:5928:B8C1:EEFD:EA47 ( talk) 19:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- One can generally find a list of valid parameter on the template's page - which usually shows the document page. Sometimes not. The template link above is a good example of a decent doc. Cheers 2606:6000:CB81:1700:5928:B8C1:EEFD:EA47 ( talk) 19:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Ghaggar-Hakra River does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Kautilya3 (
talk) 09:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Tukde Tukde Gang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Dictionary term with only one source
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Sagotreespirit (
talk) 13:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on
Babri Masjid. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 22:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 ( talk) 22:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at North East Delhi riots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 08:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —
Sanskari
Hangout 09:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kurukshetra.
Doug Weller
talk 14:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Naveen Nazim".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo ( talk) 09:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Explain this edit and why you removed an active AFD with absolutely no edit summary or reasoning. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Thiruvananthapuram Airport gold smuggling case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIR ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi ChandlerMinh, You removed my section on Surya Siddhanta page about the dating. It is against wikipedia policy to delete the sections on the basis that you do not like them. The BC era dating of Surya Siddhanta is experimentally proven by many researchers as I referenced, their publications have presented the emperical data of their experimental work which is based on highly advanced computational simulations and modern observational astronomy data. There have been referenced very well in the sections added by me.
I have realized that you are trying to delete the dating of Surya Siddhanta. I have also read previous banning warning to you about your previous edits. You can not delete articles or section which you do not like or which do not adhere to your world view or your political affiliations or your beliefs.
When the data is completely referenced, it should stay on the wiki page. Remember that, Empirical evidence and Experimentally concluded results over writes pre existing speculations or theories. This is the journey of Science. Every experimental conclusion is merely one data point away from falsification. Thats how Science progress. It progress with experiments and falsification of previously existing theories.
I hope you understand this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RahulChawla1990 ( talk • contribs) 09:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vararuchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CE.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
You tagged this article with Template:Multiple but didn't specify the issues or create a discussion on the article's talk page. If you see problems with the article, you should specify them in the template and create a new section on the talk page for discussion. -- Spasemunki ( talk) 11:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stella Kramrisch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Aryabhata, you may be
blocked from editing.
Idell (
talk) 07:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vishu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aries.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Chariotrider555 (
talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Max Müller for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
Chariotrider555 (
talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This message is made for notifying you about a discussion on WP:ARE#ChandlerMinh about your edits. Srijanx22 ( talk) 11:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Warning A discussion at Arbitration enforcement may lead towards an indefinite block of ChandlerMinh. That is because communication is required. Please respond at the enforcement request. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I need some more time to go through each of the requests made. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 14:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First man or woman.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Ram Setu (film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Ram Setu (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
McMatter (
talk)/(
contrib) 14:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
A lot of articles are available via the web; you'll have to search for yourself. Good opportunity to improve your skills! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ram Setu (film)
Hello, ChandlerMinh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Ram Setu (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohenjo-daro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Aryan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Service.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Do you have a source for the term "Emu" being used to mean Ex-Muslim? It's not mentioned in the article. Thanks! — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 20:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of J. Sai Deepak
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on J. Sai Deepak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Sai Deepak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra ( talk) 05:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
FYI, pings only work if they are included in a new comment with a new signature. This ping, for example, won't work because you added to an existing comment that is already signed. -- RegentsPark ( comment) 16:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of J. Sai Deepak
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on J. Sai Deepak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Sai Deepak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Manjima Mohan, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Partner should be used only for
domestic partner, ie, those who live together.
Ab207 (
talk) 06:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Lal Chowk, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- The source that is already there is itself mentions the content I added. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Stop making personal attacks against other editors like you did at Oldest people talk page.
Anybody with little understanding of Hindi language can tell what you were trying to say when you called another editor "chup bsdk". 27.57.173.144 ( talk) 18:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, my heartfelt apologies. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 08:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh,
Thank you for creating Vedaant Madhavan.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article needs more references in order to provide significant coverage for this article. See WP:SIGCOV
References that have scores, lists, order of merit and video do not pass as reliable sources for WP:NSPORT. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - you may wish to read WP:NSPORT ) To meet notability requirements, one more reference with significant coverage will suffice. Thank you
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 07:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Dhaakad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Grabup (
talk) 06:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Uma Thomas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
AdrianHObradors (
talk) 10:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
~Styyx
Talk? 17:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Vedaant Madhavan, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Maanvi Gagroo, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Geniac (
talk) 18:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
added a topic in talk page of narayana guru, please see Ningalonnichpovuka ( talk) 16:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theyyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Discrepancy in timeline and the rulers. 203.30.4.71 ( talk) 13:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare
Hello, ChandlerMinh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare
Hello, ChandlerMinh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " 1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
You can now move Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare to mainspace. It now satisfies WP:NF. 157.46.184.148 ( talk) 15:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Navya Nair, you may be
blocked from editing. Please add sources for new information, especially when editing biographies.
Belbury (
talk) 10:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Dhruv edits (
talk) 17:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Shamata Anchan. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Geniac (
talk) 22:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Boyinaroom. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Aniyan Midhun without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Boyinaroom (
talk) 11:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- You were right about
Aniyan Midhun Article. I also think that it is all fake. Have you nominated it for AFD?
Boyinaroom (
talk) 16:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have put an delete template.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 16:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, read this source from Hindu listed as reliable source in Wikipedia.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/thrissur-native-in-indian-team-for-world-wushu-tourney/article36535612.ece. Then how can you say that he is all fake.
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It clearly states The 28-year-old Midhun is the first person from south India to be selected to the national Wushu team
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- This news was only mentioned in local news pages of print newspaper. these claims can’t be verified with official authorities of the sport, therefore this article should be deleted.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 07:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I also doubt the same. But The Hindu is a reliable source as per wikipedia. So you cannot simply come and claim that these information are dubious. 2409:40F3:1016:40BD:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 07:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- The International Wushu Federation does not mention any event in sept. 2021 ( [1]). Only one (virtual) event was Organised that year and its results does not make any mention of him. Boyinaroom ( talk) 07:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- This news was only mentioned in local news pages of print newspaper. these claims can’t be verified with official authorities of the sport, therefore this article should be deleted.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 07:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It clearly states The 28-year-old Midhun is the first person from south India to be selected to the national Wushu team
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, read this source from Hindu listed as reliable source in Wikipedia.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/thrissur-native-in-indian-team-for-world-wushu-tourney/article36535612.ece. Then how can you say that he is all fake.
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have put an delete template.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 16:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Your CSD request was declined multiple times. Take it to AFD rather than doing CSD again 2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 07:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh,
Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you are familiar with the limited, accepted criteria that can be used when you tag a page for speedy deletion. You can't just write in your own reason, you should use the different codes that other editors and administrators are familiar with. If you invent your own reasons why a page should be deleted, it is likely to be declined. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, it is regarding this addition. I believe you'd be interested. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:51, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
The wikipedia article on surya siddhanta contains a sentence which refers to heliocentrism it states that
It treats Sun as stationary globe around which earth and other planets orbit.
But the reference does not mention anything about heliocentrism.It was added two months ago by an anonymous user Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 06:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- can you figure out when this addition was made?
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 12:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Three months back by this anonymous user 223.228.254.232 Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 12:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
In yuktibhasa article it is mentioned that yuktibhasa is the earliest text on calculus but in history of calculus article page it is referred that calculus was invented by Newton and Leibniz Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 11:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- please mention exact sentence. the contribution of Kerala school is mentioned in detail in
History of calculus
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 12:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- In yuktibhasa article it is mentioned as
- It is considered an early text on the ideas of calculus, predating Newton and Leibniz by two centuries.
- But in history of calculus page it isn't mentioned.
Kudiophi clopsvimbi (
talk) 12:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- probably it would be ideal to change "ideas of calculus" to "some ideas of calculus"
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 13:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- yes Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 13:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- probably it would be ideal to change "ideas of calculus" to "some ideas of calculus"
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 13:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- But in history of calculus page it isn't mentioned.
Kudiophi clopsvimbi (
talk) 12:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
In the article of aryabhatta it is mentioned that
For his explicit mention of the relativity of motion, he also qualifies as a major early physicist.
The reference given is written by Subhash Kak who was considered as a historical revisonist who believes in pseudoscientific stuff like indigenous aryanism and astronomy in rig vedas.Do you think his reference is accurate.
"Aryabhatiya | Encyclopedia.com" https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/aryabhatiya Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 06:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- No need to change that. it is not a wrong statement. Aryabhata is indeed a major early physicist.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 09:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- ok Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 10:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
In the section of Early history in the article History of optics it is given as
The Indian Buddhists, such as Dignāga in the 5th century and Dharmakirti in the 7th century, developed a type of atomism which defined the atoms which make up the world as momentary flashes of light or energy. They viewed light as being an atomic entity equivalent to energy, similar to the modern concept of photons, though they also viewed all matter as being composed of these light/energy particles. But there is no reference at all Leveinhockerkerala ( talk) 15:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed the "similar to photons" from that section. ancient Buddhist concepts are not based on scientific proof. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 16:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
recently some user had added Thrissur as a birth place of aryabhatta in aryabhatta article Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 11:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
In the section notable work of the article of sridhara it is mentioned that sridhara formula is also called as quadratic formula but the reference doesn't mention it as sridhara formula. Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 05:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Please quote reliable sources and continue writing the page. Xx236 ( talk) 11:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Target Olympic Podium Scheme moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Target Olympic Podium Scheme, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,
511KeV
(talk) 11:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into
Target Olympic Podium Scheme. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, ChandlerMinh,
- If an article has been moved to Draft space, please work on that version or move it back to main space, do not create a second, duplicate article on the same subject. This complicates attribution. There should never be more than one article on the same subject. Please do not do this in the future. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- I did not move it deliberately it was mistake. the main space article was on different tab on my browser. apologies ChandlerMinh ( talk) 07:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
In the section early history of the article Timeline of atomic and subatomic physics it is given that kanada proposed atom in 6th century BCE but the year the person is born is unknown as it is given as either 6th or 2nd century BCE Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 14:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manu S. Pillai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Target Olympic Podium Scheme
Hello, ChandlerMinh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Target Olympic Podium Scheme, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Welcome ChandlerMinh!
I'm Rasnaboy, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes
~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive
edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely,
Rasnaboy (
talk) 06:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Rigveda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Removing the word "probably" created a major misrepesentation of the text. Please don't do this again. The link was there for you to click on, I can't imagine why you didn't check first.
Doug Weller
talk 16:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
|
|
For helping to remove vandalism from 2020 JNU Attack DBig Xrayᗙ 13:16, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
Opindia is not a WP:reliable source. Please do not use it on Wikipedia. I have removed it.-- DBig Xrayᗙ 13:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mamankam festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Logan ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello ChandlerMinh,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aileena Catherin Amon for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Akhiljaxxn ( talk) 17:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Shaheen Bagh protests, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 17:58, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Please make sure your edit works! With the template:Infobox comics character, you used the parameter "native_name" which does not seem to be a valid parameter and wasn't showing in the infobox. I moved "ഡിങ്കൻ" to the character_name parameter and it now shows up under the name Dinkan. BTW- I accidentally clicked "Publish" instead of "Preview" and had to fix a couple of things... Cheers 2606:6000:CB81:1700:5928:B8C1:EEFD:EA47 ( talk) 19:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- One can generally find a list of valid parameter on the template's page - which usually shows the document page. Sometimes not. The template link above is a good example of a decent doc. Cheers 2606:6000:CB81:1700:5928:B8C1:EEFD:EA47 ( talk) 19:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Ghaggar-Hakra River does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Kautilya3 (
talk) 09:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Tukde Tukde Gang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Dictionary term with only one source
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
Sagotreespirit (
talk) 13:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on
Babri Masjid. This violates
Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 22:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 ( talk) 22:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at North East Delhi riots shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 08:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —
Sanskari
Hangout 09:20, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kurukshetra.
Doug Weller
talk 14:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Naveen Nazim".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo ( talk) 09:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Explain this edit and why you removed an active AFD with absolutely no edit summary or reasoning. Praxidicae ( talk) 15:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Thiruvananthapuram Airport gold smuggling case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FIR ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi ChandlerMinh, You removed my section on Surya Siddhanta page about the dating. It is against wikipedia policy to delete the sections on the basis that you do not like them. The BC era dating of Surya Siddhanta is experimentally proven by many researchers as I referenced, their publications have presented the emperical data of their experimental work which is based on highly advanced computational simulations and modern observational astronomy data. There have been referenced very well in the sections added by me.
I have realized that you are trying to delete the dating of Surya Siddhanta. I have also read previous banning warning to you about your previous edits. You can not delete articles or section which you do not like or which do not adhere to your world view or your political affiliations or your beliefs.
When the data is completely referenced, it should stay on the wiki page. Remember that, Empirical evidence and Experimentally concluded results over writes pre existing speculations or theories. This is the journey of Science. Every experimental conclusion is merely one data point away from falsification. Thats how Science progress. It progress with experiments and falsification of previously existing theories.
I hope you understand this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RahulChawla1990 ( talk • contribs) 09:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vararuchi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CE.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
You tagged this article with Template:Multiple but didn't specify the issues or create a discussion on the article's talk page. If you see problems with the article, you should specify them in the template and create a new section on the talk page for discussion. -- Spasemunki ( talk) 11:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stella Kramrisch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Czech.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:38, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Aryabhata, you may be
blocked from editing.
Idell (
talk) 07:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vishu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aries.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Chariotrider555 (
talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from using talk pages such as
Max Müller for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
Chariotrider555 (
talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This message is made for notifying you about a discussion on WP:ARE#ChandlerMinh about your edits. Srijanx22 ( talk) 11:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Warning A discussion at Arbitration enforcement may lead towards an indefinite block of ChandlerMinh. That is because communication is required. Please respond at the enforcement request. Johnuniq ( talk) 02:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
I need some more time to go through each of the requests made. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 14:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First man or woman.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Ram Setu (film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Ram Setu (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
McMatter (
talk)/(
contrib) 14:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
A lot of articles are available via the web; you'll have to search for yourself. Good opportunity to improve your skills! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ram Setu (film)
Hello, ChandlerMinh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Ram Setu (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohenjo-daro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo-Aryan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Economy of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Service.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Do you have a source for the term "Emu" being used to mean Ex-Muslim? It's not mentioned in the article. Thanks! — swpb T • go beyond • bad idea 20:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of J. Sai Deepak
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on J. Sai Deepak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Sai Deepak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra ( talk) 05:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
FYI, pings only work if they are included in a new comment with a new signature. This ping, for example, won't work because you added to an existing comment that is already signed. -- RegentsPark ( comment) 16:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Speedy deletion nomination of J. Sai Deepak
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on J. Sai Deepak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Sai Deepak. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Ab207. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Manjima Mohan, but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Partner should be used only for
domestic partner, ie, those who live together.
Ab207 (
talk) 06:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Lal Chowk, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Kautilya3 (
talk) 20:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
- The source that is already there is itself mentions the content I added. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 09:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Stop making personal attacks against other editors like you did at Oldest people talk page.
Anybody with little understanding of Hindi language can tell what you were trying to say when you called another editor "chup bsdk". 27.57.173.144 ( talk) 18:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, my heartfelt apologies. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 08:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh,
Thank you for creating Vedaant Madhavan.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This article needs more references in order to provide significant coverage for this article. See WP:SIGCOV
References that have scores, lists, order of merit and video do not pass as reliable sources for WP:NSPORT. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - you may wish to read WP:NSPORT ) To meet notability requirements, one more reference with significant coverage will suffice. Thank you
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru ( talk) 07:33, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Dhaakad have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse. Thanks.
Grabup (
talk) 06:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The article Uma Thomas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:54, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
AdrianHObradors (
talk) 10:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
~Styyx
Talk? 17:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Vedaant Madhavan, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
- MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Maanvi Gagroo, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Geniac (
talk) 18:19, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
added a topic in talk page of narayana guru, please see Ningalonnichpovuka ( talk) 16:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theyyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Discrepancy in timeline and the rulers. 203.30.4.71 ( talk) 13:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare
Hello, ChandlerMinh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare
Hello, ChandlerMinh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, " 1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh ( talk) 17:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
You can now move Draft:1921: Puzha Muthal Puzha Vare to mainspace. It now satisfies WP:NF. 157.46.184.148 ( talk) 15:25, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Navya Nair, you may be
blocked from editing. Please add sources for new information, especially when editing biographies.
Belbury (
talk) 10:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
2023 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Dhruv edits (
talk) 17:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at
Shamata Anchan. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Geniac (
talk) 22:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Boyinaroom. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Aniyan Midhun without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Boyinaroom (
talk) 11:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- You were right about
Aniyan Midhun Article. I also think that it is all fake. Have you nominated it for AFD?
Boyinaroom (
talk) 16:07, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have put an delete template.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 16:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, read this source from Hindu listed as reliable source in Wikipedia.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/thrissur-native-in-indian-team-for-world-wushu-tourney/article36535612.ece. Then how can you say that he is all fake.
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It clearly states The 28-year-old Midhun is the first person from south India to be selected to the national Wushu team
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- This news was only mentioned in local news pages of print newspaper. these claims can’t be verified with official authorities of the sport, therefore this article should be deleted.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 07:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I also doubt the same. But The Hindu is a reliable source as per wikipedia. So you cannot simply come and claim that these information are dubious. 2409:40F3:1016:40BD:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 07:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- The International Wushu Federation does not mention any event in sept. 2021 ( [1]). Only one (virtual) event was Organised that year and its results does not make any mention of him. Boyinaroom ( talk) 07:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- This news was only mentioned in local news pages of print newspaper. these claims can’t be verified with official authorities of the sport, therefore this article should be deleted.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 07:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- It clearly states The 28-year-old Midhun is the first person from south India to be selected to the national Wushu team
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, read this source from Hindu listed as reliable source in Wikipedia.
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/thrissur-native-in-indian-team-for-world-wushu-tourney/article36535612.ece. Then how can you say that he is all fake.
2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 (
talk) 07:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have put an delete template.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 16:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Your CSD request was declined multiple times. Take it to AFD rather than doing CSD again 2409:40F3:16:1D7D:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 07:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, ChandlerMinh,
Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you are familiar with the limited, accepted criteria that can be used when you tag a page for speedy deletion. You can't just write in your own reason, you should use the different codes that other editors and administrators are familiar with. If you invent your own reasons why a page should be deleted, it is likely to be declined. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, it is regarding this addition. I believe you'd be interested. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:51, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
The wikipedia article on surya siddhanta contains a sentence which refers to heliocentrism it states that
It treats Sun as stationary globe around which earth and other planets orbit.
But the reference does not mention anything about heliocentrism.It was added two months ago by an anonymous user Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 06:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- can you figure out when this addition was made?
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 12:51, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Three months back by this anonymous user 223.228.254.232 Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 12:58, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
In yuktibhasa article it is mentioned that yuktibhasa is the earliest text on calculus but in history of calculus article page it is referred that calculus was invented by Newton and Leibniz Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 11:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- please mention exact sentence. the contribution of Kerala school is mentioned in detail in
History of calculus
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 12:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- In yuktibhasa article it is mentioned as
- It is considered an early text on the ideas of calculus, predating Newton and Leibniz by two centuries.
- But in history of calculus page it isn't mentioned.
Kudiophi clopsvimbi (
talk) 12:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- probably it would be ideal to change "ideas of calculus" to "some ideas of calculus"
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 13:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- yes Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 13:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- probably it would be ideal to change "ideas of calculus" to "some ideas of calculus"
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 13:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
- But in history of calculus page it isn't mentioned.
Kudiophi clopsvimbi (
talk) 12:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
In the article of aryabhatta it is mentioned that
For his explicit mention of the relativity of motion, he also qualifies as a major early physicist.
The reference given is written by Subhash Kak who was considered as a historical revisonist who believes in pseudoscientific stuff like indigenous aryanism and astronomy in rig vedas.Do you think his reference is accurate.
"Aryabhatiya | Encyclopedia.com" https://www.encyclopedia.com/international/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/aryabhatiya Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 06:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- No need to change that. it is not a wrong statement. Aryabhata is indeed a major early physicist.
ChandlerMinh (
talk) 09:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- ok Kudiophi clopsvimbi ( talk) 10:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
In the section of Early history in the article History of optics it is given as
The Indian Buddhists, such as Dignāga in the 5th century and Dharmakirti in the 7th century, developed a type of atomism which defined the atoms which make up the world as momentary flashes of light or energy. They viewed light as being an atomic entity equivalent to energy, similar to the modern concept of photons, though they also viewed all matter as being composed of these light/energy particles. But there is no reference at all Leveinhockerkerala ( talk) 15:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have removed the "similar to photons" from that section. ancient Buddhist concepts are not based on scientific proof. ChandlerMinh ( talk) 16:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
recently some user had added Thrissur as a birth place of aryabhatta in aryabhatta article Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 11:15, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
In the section notable work of the article of sridhara it is mentioned that sridhara formula is also called as quadratic formula but the reference doesn't mention it as sridhara formula. Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 05:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Please quote reliable sources and continue writing the page. Xx236 ( talk) 11:25, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Target Olympic Podium Scheme moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Target Olympic Podium Scheme, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,
511KeV
(talk) 11:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into
Target Olympic Podium Scheme. This is known as a "
cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is
legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, ChandlerMinh,
- If an article has been moved to Draft space, please work on that version or move it back to main space, do not create a second, duplicate article on the same subject. This complicates attribution. There should never be more than one article on the same subject. Please do not do this in the future. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 01:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- I did not move it deliberately it was mistake. the main space article was on different tab on my browser. apologies ChandlerMinh ( talk) 07:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
In the section early history of the article Timeline of atomic and subatomic physics it is given that kanada proposed atom in 6th century BCE but the year the person is born is unknown as it is given as either 6th or 2nd century BCE Myuoh kaka roi ( talk) 14:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manu S. Pillai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Target Olympic Podium Scheme
Hello, ChandlerMinh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Target Olympic Podium Scheme, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)