Archive of May/June 2008. Various requests, conversations, exchanges. Relatively little trolling, as I'm not doing as much recent-change patrolling as I used to.
Would you help with an irritating situation in the Musical historicism article? A really small matter at that. We have a relevant opinion of a major musicologist apropos a composer (user lute88) which the latter publishes on his site and we cite it in the article. User Jerome Kohl considers it OR and keeps reverting it over and over. (As far as I know it might have stemmed from some usenet irritation in the past) Thanks. Galassi ( talk) 21:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello my friend. After your last edit here, it occurs to me to mention that you can add {{ bots|deny=SineBot}} to your talk page (like this), and that helpful Sinebot then stays away. I did this on my talk page, because I would much rather add {{ Unsigned}} myself if the unsigned post was constructive. Best wishes, RobertG ♬ talk 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
.... for reverting vandalism on my user page! Pedro : Chat 13:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight ( talk) 02:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I created that page, and have (with a little help from my friends) brought it along. In the first attack, it was a pleasant surprise to have you magically appear and do a revert. Keep up the good work. Best to you. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 02:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Stan
That stuff is really getting annoying, have you seen anything more disruptive on wikipedia than that nonsense? Since you've been here since early 2004, what are the main major troubles you have come up against, i was just interested. By the way, is it only admins who can fix the problem of moving the page back to its right position? I just dont want to think about if there are no admins around for a time that it goes unnoticed for a while. Good luck to all of you, you need it! Thanks Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 03:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
It really burns me up when a friend's page gets repeatedly vandalized like that. At least we can be thankful the user was blocked indefinately! And I find the best way to cool down after these occurrences is to enjoy a nice dish of cookies and a glass of milk:
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla ( talk) 04:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
That was a quite delightful surprise!!! Thank you very much!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla ( talk) 03:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the reverts there.. I think that's the first time I've had a vandal centre his vandalism almost entirely around me... I have no idea whether to take it as a sign that I'm doing a good job, or a bad one. :) Dreaded Walrus t c 04:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 10:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, here we go again! It's actually been a while since I consulted you for an opinion, but anyway, I'd like to know what you think of this potential article: [1] Thanks!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla ( talk) 23:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
New sock of BoxingWear etc - NewBlock ( talk · contribs) (see particularly [5]). Just tried to recruit me into the dispute via off-wiki canvassing. Gordonofcartoon ( talk) 02:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Antandrus statement is half true, its not nice to provoke people and accuse me of users i am not! More here:
Thank you! Corvus cornix talk 02:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to praise your essay at User:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior. It's beautifully written and rings true with my own experience, although I haven't been as involved with vandal- and troll-fighting as you seem to have been. Your advice is sobering and was helpful, and I hope you'll continue to contribute to articles and cool tempers here for a long time. Dcoetzee 03:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I have been watching several articles in silence for quite a long while now, and although I am not an editor, nor am I exactly sure how to be one, I must say that Hu12's edits are way out of control. He obviously has some special administrative powers, but he is using them to the detriment of Wikipedia. I often use Wiki to research material and was surprised by what seems to be a level of bias applied by Hu12. Everything appears to be subjective. If he does not like a particular edit for any reason, he seems to react quite quickly in reverting the edit, and if the edit is then re-reverted by another editor, he then calls the person a sockpuppet and blocks them. Not fully knowing what a sockpuppet is, I can fairly well guess at it. I cannot understand why admins are not screened a little more carefully. It seems to me that this particular admin has lost the plot, and I am starting to see some really negative stuff about him on other posts (which appear to be vandalism however) and even on his own talk page. I simply ask that you look into all of his contributions and deletions and spam blocks and general history, to determine if indeed this is someone wikipedia wants as an admin. I have even searched Google and found lots of references to his actions, almost all negative. An admin should be acting by the book, and not write their own set of rules or interpret the rules to suit their style of adminship. Please, seriously consider having a word with Hu12 about this, and see if he should be pulling his head in. It doesn't look good for wikipedia, and I really believe he is now starting to write wikipedia the way HE wants it to be written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.100.128.152 ( talk • contribs)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight ( talk) 03:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Nice one. -- John ( talk) 04:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker ( talk) 16:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your answer on the Humanities refdesk (regarding royalty trusts) and I gather that you also think it's important for WP to provide decent investment information to casual investors. If you have the time, you might like to consider Wikipedia:WikiProject Investment, where a few of us have recently got together to do just that. Have a look if you're interested. Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 11:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antandrus, I've sent you an E-mail. Best wishes. Acalamari 23:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
64.107.3.126 has been brought to my attention, & I have softblocked for 2 weeks. If you want to hardblock or extend it to a range, do as you think best--I think you know this situation better than I do. DGG ( talk) 01:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks! That does mean a lot to me; just browsing pages like RfA makes me feel a bit like a stranger--I don't know any of these people. I suppose it'll take a few days to get back into old habits, though judging by the dizzying speed of RC, I'll need to adopt one of those third-party edit monitoring tools if I'm to be of any use. But it's nice to be remembered, and likewise nice to see that you (and a few other veterans, judging by my watch list) have remained fruitfully active. Best, -- Hadal ( talk) 05:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antandrus! This is another suggestion from AFC. This man seems notable enough to me, but I wasn't sure. I've pasted the suggestion into my sandbox; could you take a look for me? [7] Thanks!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 01:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Now this is what I call dedication to the project - [8] and then this [9]. You get out of here and enjoy your Wikibreak! If I had the tools I would temporarily block you (tongue in cheek, he he...) so you would have to get out of here and enjoy some time away. Now scat! JungleCat Shiny!/ Oohhh! 05:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I turned this guy in for issuing a veiled threat against you. I actually clicked rollback unintentionally, but I reckon that was OK. He then issued an "FU" type comment to me, and now he's blocked for 3 months. [10] Just thought you'd like to know. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 03:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Tandrus? How's everything?
Sorry, I forgot that deleting the page would clear the protection. ~~ N ( t/ c) 21:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Good to have you back here, Antandrus! I hope you enjoyed your wiki-break. Sorry, if this is a little soon after you've returned, but I'd like to know if you think this recent suggestion from AFC is notable for Wikipedia? [11] Thanks!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 23:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
GRP. That would be "George Reeves Project"? I thought that lunatic had been dispatched a couple of years ago. Do you want to block the latest IP, or would you like someone to turn it in at AIV? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
'Nuff said. It is simply great to see you whacking the vandals. The former Lucky 6.9 now known as -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 17:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a look here: [15], Andrea Antico is the name of the Italian Community of Montona/Motovun! Please, show me ONE WORD wrote by Antico in croatian!
---> Prof. Josip Andreis ("Music in Croatia", Zagreb, Institut of Musicology-Academy of Music, 1974) took over the 'Croatization' of the name of Andrea Antico from the Zagreb scholar Lovro Zupanovic, but admitted his claims are non generally accepted even among other music historians in Zagreb. In fact, the "Muzika Enciklopedija" (Zagreb, 1971) mentions Zupanovic's claims (under the entry 'Antico') more as an oddity than an established fact. See also: Bojan Bujic, "Music & Letters", Oxford University Press, LVI (34), 441 (1975), p. 441.
Now, I'm waiting for your apology (and sorry for my poor english)-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 20:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Istria was under Venetian control in the 16th century?!? The coastal areas and cities of Istria came under Venetian Influence in the IX century! It became definitely the territory of the Republic of Venice in 1267.-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 07:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Well-sourced? Picker is NOT a primary source (firsthand written evidence of history made at the time of the event by someone who was present). Picker is NOT a secondary source (written accounts of history based upon the evidence from primary sources. For example a history book drawing upon diary and newspaper records). Picker is only a tertiary source: compilations based upon primary and secondary sources. So the question is: who is the Picker's source? -- Luigi 28 ( talk) 22:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I repeat: who is the Picker's PRIMARY SOURCE? Where are the ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS about Antico?-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 06:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
"What was Antico's native language? I don't know, and it is probable no one knows. (...) The first thirty years of his life are a blank" ---> BINGO! So... who can say that Andrea Antico was "of Croatian birth"? The note from Grove online is a FORGERY!-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 18:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Never said that. But - I repeat - the note from Grove online is a forgery. Prof. Picker made a mistake.-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 21:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Petty nationalist grievances? Don't you care about the correctness of the voice "Antico"? Prof. Picker is the only one source you know? I 've read: F.Dorigo, Andrea Antico in Istria e Dalmazia. Uomini e tempi, Del Bianco, Udine 1991; G.Gravisi, Andrea Antico istriano da Montona, in Atti e Memorie della Società Istriana d'Archeologia e Storia Patria, V, 1; V.Levi, Andrea Antico, in Pagine Istriane, 1950; A.Jeppesen, Die italienische Orgelmusik am Anfang des Cinquecento, Kopenhagen, 1943. Do you know Italian or German? Do you know ONE primary source about Andrea Antico? Do you know the Picker's source (a Zupanovic's study)?-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 10:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[16] I liked that it has so many sources provided, but I'm not sure if the context reads like an advertisement or not. What do you think? The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I hereby award you this Barnstar for your quick, but cool-headed interaction against the vandalism committed by User:DNA to RNA → Christian .И 19:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |
I saw you were listed at WP:HAU, and that you indicated "images".
I'm looking for an experienced GIMP user. Or an experienced graphics designer willing to download and learn the GIMP (it's free, and its multi-layer file format makes collaborating on artwork easy).
Are you one?
The Transhumanist 00:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight ( talk) 17:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
After reading your essay about behavoir and such, I just wanted to say that I hope I can one day do as much good as you have. Thank you, so much. Leonard^Bloom ( talk) 03:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
this is my favorite to date. Spot on. :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Creationism2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neelix ( talk) 20:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, Antandrus! This time, I've got another one from AFC: [17] Do you think she's notable enough for Wikipedia? Thanks in advance!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 04:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antandrus, I have to repeat with you that for every single word I wrote in Wikipedia I can show one, two or three source(s) (more books than links). If you see, every time (with only two or three excepions) I wrote something, in few minutes another one ( User:DIREKTOR) reverted my work, every time (except you) without any kind of explanation, except: "You are a banned user". For me, this is a real, incredible, personal war that two users (also [User:AlasdairGreen27]) play against me. I've never, never banned in my life from mailing lists, groups, clubs and so on. Thank you for your message and best regards.-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 07:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
wish I thought of that. Dloh cierekim 23:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I hope you've been doing well. What do you think of this one? [18] Thanks! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 21:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, Antandrus! Here's another one I'd appreciate your opinion on. Other than that I'm not sure about his notability, I was worried if there might be any other problems with this suggestion. I myself couldn't see any, though. [19] Thanks in advance!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 04:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
You must tired of these messages, but I really would like to say how much I admire you observations on wikipedia behaviour. The comment on users who leave in anger often coming back to attack those who they lest because of is particularly apt. I have only recently observed this in an editor. Harland1 ( t/ c) 16:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I was writing a short article on Mascherata, and I could find very little quality info on the topic (which accounts for it's stub-like length). I tried using the Grove site you mention here, but with no luck; I don't have a subscription. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind helping out on this one? If you are busy I understand, but I would prefer this article to be more descriptive and accurate. Happy editing, Leonard^Bloom ( talk) 18:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
When former users want to reform, they reform. They create a new account and avoid doing the things that got them blocked in the first place; i.e. we never know about them because they give us no reason to suspect the new account because it behaves properly. All this user wants to is bring attention on himself by repeatedly creating new accounts and continue his problematic editing with each one. That's not reform by any definition of the word. If he's reformed, then the next account he creates will never be identified as him. -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 19:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
When admin checks sockpuppets what tool they use? Don't admins check the perosnal IP, or thier home ad? Because one household can sometimes have 5 persons. A brother and a sister, both have indivual account is not a sockpuppet. In Category we have over 2000 suspect sockpuppets. How does admins know they have similar contributing patterns, and behavior conducts. In some family, they have roomates, so 2 accounts for IP of 2 distinctive person is not a sockpuppet.-- Freewayguy Discussions Show all changes 20:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Yep, that's definitely him. The thing is he may very well be right about the emblem of Byzantium not being the crescent and star (I always thought it was an eagle). So the info in the article is pretty fishy and needs some solid sourcing. But the way he's conducted himself with blind accusations of lying, racism, violation of human rights etc. is simply not acceptable. Some reliable sources would solve the problem without the need for high drama. -- Folantin ( talk) 20:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
can u answer question neway evn tho we wer enemies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.81.16 ( talk • contribs)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed Jew and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are multiple issues that need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 07:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I created the checkuser request at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Voldemore. I'm not experienced in this, and you may want to add comments. Cenarium Talk 14:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I was very close to IARing and doing it myself. Question, if I delete and restore all but those, will they be totally gone? I don't want to see them in my history. Thanks TravellingCari the Busy Bee 03:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert to the vandalism on my userpage and for blocking the vandal! Nobody of Consequence ( talk) 05:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much for taking the time to say hi. Having read your user page, I'm totally curious as to who you are, but I totally understand choosing to edit anonymously since that's my preference too. I'm still in academia (musicology as it happens). Anyway, I'm keen to learn about the Wikipedia community so please let me know if I overstep some guidelines (like the tilde business). I'm not even sure if I should reply to you on my talk page, or on yours. Azzaiolo ( talk) 02:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Please have a look at this and this, along with User:Southerndata's talk page and this too. Thanks :/ Gwen Gale ( talk) 22:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Meanwhile... uh oh. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
First of all, thank you that you noticed my alert. As you see my first attempt was to use the discussion page. Only after 3 months, I decided to put an alert into the article in question. Due to the special sensitivity of the section in question, my original strategy was not to edit it, I will keep this strategy in the future. But if you are an administrator, then you could consult with others in order to protect the diverse articles from this kind of problem. My experience is, that this problem is more frequent in the English part of the WikiPedia, than in the German part, or even in the Hungarian part. The problem itself, naturally, must get ITS OWN SYSTEM OF ARTICLES, but it is not a good idea to pollute ANY ARTICLE WHICH HAS EVEN ONLY A MINOR CONNECTION with the problem in question.
From my side, to be more constructive, I decided to add a section about the more popular sections of the Passion. I played vionlin as a hobby only, hence I observed happily, that you professionally play the both of violin and piano. OK, so you are educated in music and you are a native English speaker, so I ask you to correct my future contributions from the both sides.
RAW IP address: you see a few "80.98.216.80" raw IP addresses instead of "Prohlep" in the [24] history page. Could you tell me, how can I declare, that the dynamical "80.98.216.80" raw IP address in that days are in fact me = "Prohlep"? Simply there was a Wiki-server error, and I was not experienced enough to realise, that I was fallen out of my login, and I simply keeped working and saving page, but did not realise that I am anonymous "80.98.216.80" instead of the well documented "Prohlep". Can I personally as a plain user change that anonymous dynamical IP addresses to my real login name, or an administrator is neede for that?
prohlep ( talk) 17:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
With this an indef blcoks; you meant to block them forever for vandalism only account? What about if one day they want to contribute again what should they do? use thir IP? Make new account?-- Freewayguy Msg USC 19:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Actually whats open proxy and zombie mean? Same as sockpuppet?-- Freewayguy Msg USC 21:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Archive of May/June 2008. Various requests, conversations, exchanges. Relatively little trolling, as I'm not doing as much recent-change patrolling as I used to.
Would you help with an irritating situation in the Musical historicism article? A really small matter at that. We have a relevant opinion of a major musicologist apropos a composer (user lute88) which the latter publishes on his site and we cite it in the article. User Jerome Kohl considers it OR and keeps reverting it over and over. (As far as I know it might have stemmed from some usenet irritation in the past) Thanks. Galassi ( talk) 21:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello my friend. After your last edit here, it occurs to me to mention that you can add {{ bots|deny=SineBot}} to your talk page (like this), and that helpful Sinebot then stays away. I did this on my talk page, because I would much rather add {{ Unsigned}} myself if the unsigned post was constructive. Best wishes, RobertG ♬ talk 14:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
.... for reverting vandalism on my user page! Pedro : Chat 13:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight ( talk) 02:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I created that page, and have (with a little help from my friends) brought it along. In the first attack, it was a pleasant surprise to have you magically appear and do a revert. Keep up the good work. Best to you. 7&6=thirteen ( talk) 02:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Stan
That stuff is really getting annoying, have you seen anything more disruptive on wikipedia than that nonsense? Since you've been here since early 2004, what are the main major troubles you have come up against, i was just interested. By the way, is it only admins who can fix the problem of moving the page back to its right position? I just dont want to think about if there are no admins around for a time that it goes unnoticed for a while. Good luck to all of you, you need it! Thanks Roadrunnerz45 ( talk 2 me) 03:49, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
It really burns me up when a friend's page gets repeatedly vandalized like that. At least we can be thankful the user was blocked indefinately! And I find the best way to cool down after these occurrences is to enjoy a nice dish of cookies and a glass of milk:
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla ( talk) 04:14, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
That was a quite delightful surprise!!! Thank you very much!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla ( talk) 03:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the reverts there.. I think that's the first time I've had a vandal centre his vandalism almost entirely around me... I have no idea whether to take it as a sign that I'm doing a good job, or a bad one. :) Dreaded Walrus t c 04:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 10:20, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, here we go again! It's actually been a while since I consulted you for an opinion, but anyway, I'd like to know what you think of this potential article: [1] Thanks!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla ( talk) 23:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
New sock of BoxingWear etc - NewBlock ( talk · contribs) (see particularly [5]). Just tried to recruit me into the dispute via off-wiki canvassing. Gordonofcartoon ( talk) 02:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Antandrus statement is half true, its not nice to provoke people and accuse me of users i am not! More here:
Thank you! Corvus cornix talk 02:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to praise your essay at User:Antandrus/observations_on_Wikipedia_behavior. It's beautifully written and rings true with my own experience, although I haven't been as involved with vandal- and troll-fighting as you seem to have been. Your advice is sobering and was helpful, and I hope you'll continue to contribute to articles and cool tempers here for a long time. Dcoetzee 03:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I have been watching several articles in silence for quite a long while now, and although I am not an editor, nor am I exactly sure how to be one, I must say that Hu12's edits are way out of control. He obviously has some special administrative powers, but he is using them to the detriment of Wikipedia. I often use Wiki to research material and was surprised by what seems to be a level of bias applied by Hu12. Everything appears to be subjective. If he does not like a particular edit for any reason, he seems to react quite quickly in reverting the edit, and if the edit is then re-reverted by another editor, he then calls the person a sockpuppet and blocks them. Not fully knowing what a sockpuppet is, I can fairly well guess at it. I cannot understand why admins are not screened a little more carefully. It seems to me that this particular admin has lost the plot, and I am starting to see some really negative stuff about him on other posts (which appear to be vandalism however) and even on his own talk page. I simply ask that you look into all of his contributions and deletions and spam blocks and general history, to determine if indeed this is someone wikipedia wants as an admin. I have even searched Google and found lots of references to his actions, almost all negative. An admin should be acting by the book, and not write their own set of rules or interpret the rules to suit their style of adminship. Please, seriously consider having a word with Hu12 about this, and see if he should be pulling his head in. It doesn't look good for wikipedia, and I really believe he is now starting to write wikipedia the way HE wants it to be written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.100.128.152 ( talk • contribs)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight ( talk) 03:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Nice one. -- John ( talk) 04:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker ( talk) 16:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your answer on the Humanities refdesk (regarding royalty trusts) and I gather that you also think it's important for WP to provide decent investment information to casual investors. If you have the time, you might like to consider Wikipedia:WikiProject Investment, where a few of us have recently got together to do just that. Have a look if you're interested. Zain Ebrahim ( talk) 11:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antandrus, I've sent you an E-mail. Best wishes. Acalamari 23:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
64.107.3.126 has been brought to my attention, & I have softblocked for 2 weeks. If you want to hardblock or extend it to a range, do as you think best--I think you know this situation better than I do. DGG ( talk) 01:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 05:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks! That does mean a lot to me; just browsing pages like RfA makes me feel a bit like a stranger--I don't know any of these people. I suppose it'll take a few days to get back into old habits, though judging by the dizzying speed of RC, I'll need to adopt one of those third-party edit monitoring tools if I'm to be of any use. But it's nice to be remembered, and likewise nice to see that you (and a few other veterans, judging by my watch list) have remained fruitfully active. Best, -- Hadal ( talk) 05:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antandrus! This is another suggestion from AFC. This man seems notable enough to me, but I wasn't sure. I've pasted the suggestion into my sandbox; could you take a look for me? [7] Thanks!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 01:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Now this is what I call dedication to the project - [8] and then this [9]. You get out of here and enjoy your Wikibreak! If I had the tools I would temporarily block you (tongue in cheek, he he...) so you would have to get out of here and enjoy some time away. Now scat! JungleCat Shiny!/ Oohhh! 05:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I turned this guy in for issuing a veiled threat against you. I actually clicked rollback unintentionally, but I reckon that was OK. He then issued an "FU" type comment to me, and now he's blocked for 3 months. [10] Just thought you'd like to know. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 03:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Tandrus? How's everything?
Sorry, I forgot that deleting the page would clear the protection. ~~ N ( t/ c) 21:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Good to have you back here, Antandrus! I hope you enjoyed your wiki-break. Sorry, if this is a little soon after you've returned, but I'd like to know if you think this recent suggestion from AFC is notable for Wikipedia? [11] Thanks!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 23:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
GRP. That would be "George Reeves Project"? I thought that lunatic had been dispatched a couple of years ago. Do you want to block the latest IP, or would you like someone to turn it in at AIV? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
'Nuff said. It is simply great to see you whacking the vandals. The former Lucky 6.9 now known as -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 17:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
PMDrive1061 (
talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a look here: [15], Andrea Antico is the name of the Italian Community of Montona/Motovun! Please, show me ONE WORD wrote by Antico in croatian!
---> Prof. Josip Andreis ("Music in Croatia", Zagreb, Institut of Musicology-Academy of Music, 1974) took over the 'Croatization' of the name of Andrea Antico from the Zagreb scholar Lovro Zupanovic, but admitted his claims are non generally accepted even among other music historians in Zagreb. In fact, the "Muzika Enciklopedija" (Zagreb, 1971) mentions Zupanovic's claims (under the entry 'Antico') more as an oddity than an established fact. See also: Bojan Bujic, "Music & Letters", Oxford University Press, LVI (34), 441 (1975), p. 441.
Now, I'm waiting for your apology (and sorry for my poor english)-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 20:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Istria was under Venetian control in the 16th century?!? The coastal areas and cities of Istria came under Venetian Influence in the IX century! It became definitely the territory of the Republic of Venice in 1267.-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 07:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Well-sourced? Picker is NOT a primary source (firsthand written evidence of history made at the time of the event by someone who was present). Picker is NOT a secondary source (written accounts of history based upon the evidence from primary sources. For example a history book drawing upon diary and newspaper records). Picker is only a tertiary source: compilations based upon primary and secondary sources. So the question is: who is the Picker's source? -- Luigi 28 ( talk) 22:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I repeat: who is the Picker's PRIMARY SOURCE? Where are the ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS about Antico?-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 06:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
"What was Antico's native language? I don't know, and it is probable no one knows. (...) The first thirty years of his life are a blank" ---> BINGO! So... who can say that Andrea Antico was "of Croatian birth"? The note from Grove online is a FORGERY!-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 18:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Never said that. But - I repeat - the note from Grove online is a forgery. Prof. Picker made a mistake.-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 21:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Petty nationalist grievances? Don't you care about the correctness of the voice "Antico"? Prof. Picker is the only one source you know? I 've read: F.Dorigo, Andrea Antico in Istria e Dalmazia. Uomini e tempi, Del Bianco, Udine 1991; G.Gravisi, Andrea Antico istriano da Montona, in Atti e Memorie della Società Istriana d'Archeologia e Storia Patria, V, 1; V.Levi, Andrea Antico, in Pagine Istriane, 1950; A.Jeppesen, Die italienische Orgelmusik am Anfang des Cinquecento, Kopenhagen, 1943. Do you know Italian or German? Do you know ONE primary source about Andrea Antico? Do you know the Picker's source (a Zupanovic's study)?-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 10:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
[16] I liked that it has so many sources provided, but I'm not sure if the context reads like an advertisement or not. What do you think? The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 00:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I hereby award you this Barnstar for your quick, but cool-headed interaction against the vandalism committed by User:DNA to RNA → Christian .И 19:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC) |
I saw you were listed at WP:HAU, and that you indicated "images".
I'm looking for an experienced GIMP user. Or an experienced graphics designer willing to download and learn the GIMP (it's free, and its multi-layer file format makes collaborating on artwork easy).
Are you one?
The Transhumanist 00:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight ( talk) 17:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
After reading your essay about behavoir and such, I just wanted to say that I hope I can one day do as much good as you have. Thank you, so much. Leonard^Bloom ( talk) 03:25, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
this is my favorite to date. Spot on. :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Creationism2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neelix ( talk) 20:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, Antandrus! This time, I've got another one from AFC: [17] Do you think she's notable enough for Wikipedia? Thanks in advance!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 04:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Antandrus, I have to repeat with you that for every single word I wrote in Wikipedia I can show one, two or three source(s) (more books than links). If you see, every time (with only two or three excepions) I wrote something, in few minutes another one ( User:DIREKTOR) reverted my work, every time (except you) without any kind of explanation, except: "You are a banned user". For me, this is a real, incredible, personal war that two users (also [User:AlasdairGreen27]) play against me. I've never, never banned in my life from mailing lists, groups, clubs and so on. Thank you for your message and best regards.-- Luigi 28 ( talk) 07:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
wish I thought of that. Dloh cierekim 23:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I hope you've been doing well. What do you think of this one? [18] Thanks! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 21:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, Antandrus! Here's another one I'd appreciate your opinion on. Other than that I'm not sure about his notability, I was worried if there might be any other problems with this suggestion. I myself couldn't see any, though. [19] Thanks in advance!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! ( talk) 04:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
You must tired of these messages, but I really would like to say how much I admire you observations on wikipedia behaviour. The comment on users who leave in anger often coming back to attack those who they lest because of is particularly apt. I have only recently observed this in an editor. Harland1 ( t/ c) 16:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I was writing a short article on Mascherata, and I could find very little quality info on the topic (which accounts for it's stub-like length). I tried using the Grove site you mention here, but with no luck; I don't have a subscription. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind helping out on this one? If you are busy I understand, but I would prefer this article to be more descriptive and accurate. Happy editing, Leonard^Bloom ( talk) 18:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
When former users want to reform, they reform. They create a new account and avoid doing the things that got them blocked in the first place; i.e. we never know about them because they give us no reason to suspect the new account because it behaves properly. All this user wants to is bring attention on himself by repeatedly creating new accounts and continue his problematic editing with each one. That's not reform by any definition of the word. If he's reformed, then the next account he creates will never be identified as him. -- Jayron32. talk. contribs 19:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
When admin checks sockpuppets what tool they use? Don't admins check the perosnal IP, or thier home ad? Because one household can sometimes have 5 persons. A brother and a sister, both have indivual account is not a sockpuppet. In Category we have over 2000 suspect sockpuppets. How does admins know they have similar contributing patterns, and behavior conducts. In some family, they have roomates, so 2 accounts for IP of 2 distinctive person is not a sockpuppet.-- Freewayguy Discussions Show all changes 20:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Yep, that's definitely him. The thing is he may very well be right about the emblem of Byzantium not being the crescent and star (I always thought it was an eagle). So the info in the article is pretty fishy and needs some solid sourcing. But the way he's conducted himself with blind accusations of lying, racism, violation of human rights etc. is simply not acceptable. Some reliable sources would solve the problem without the need for high drama. -- Folantin ( talk) 20:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
can u answer question neway evn tho we wer enemies —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.81.16 ( talk • contribs)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria and I'm specifically going over all of the "Culture and Society" articles. I have reviewed Jew and believe the article currently meets the majority of the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. In reviewing the article, I have found there are multiple issues that need to be addressed, and I'll leave the article on hold for seven days for them to be fixed. I have left this message on your talk page since you have significantly edited the article (based on using this article history tool). Please consider helping address the several points that I listed on the talk page of the article, which shouldn't take too long to fix with the assistance of multiple editors. I have also left messages on the talk pages for other editors and related WikiProjects to spread the workload around some. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 ( talk) 07:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I created the checkuser request at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Voldemore. I'm not experienced in this, and you may want to add comments. Cenarium Talk 14:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I was very close to IARing and doing it myself. Question, if I delete and restore all but those, will they be totally gone? I don't want to see them in my history. Thanks TravellingCari the Busy Bee 03:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert to the vandalism on my userpage and for blocking the vandal! Nobody of Consequence ( talk) 05:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much for taking the time to say hi. Having read your user page, I'm totally curious as to who you are, but I totally understand choosing to edit anonymously since that's my preference too. I'm still in academia (musicology as it happens). Anyway, I'm keen to learn about the Wikipedia community so please let me know if I overstep some guidelines (like the tilde business). I'm not even sure if I should reply to you on my talk page, or on yours. Azzaiolo ( talk) 02:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Please have a look at this and this, along with User:Southerndata's talk page and this too. Thanks :/ Gwen Gale ( talk) 22:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Meanwhile... uh oh. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
First of all, thank you that you noticed my alert. As you see my first attempt was to use the discussion page. Only after 3 months, I decided to put an alert into the article in question. Due to the special sensitivity of the section in question, my original strategy was not to edit it, I will keep this strategy in the future. But if you are an administrator, then you could consult with others in order to protect the diverse articles from this kind of problem. My experience is, that this problem is more frequent in the English part of the WikiPedia, than in the German part, or even in the Hungarian part. The problem itself, naturally, must get ITS OWN SYSTEM OF ARTICLES, but it is not a good idea to pollute ANY ARTICLE WHICH HAS EVEN ONLY A MINOR CONNECTION with the problem in question.
From my side, to be more constructive, I decided to add a section about the more popular sections of the Passion. I played vionlin as a hobby only, hence I observed happily, that you professionally play the both of violin and piano. OK, so you are educated in music and you are a native English speaker, so I ask you to correct my future contributions from the both sides.
RAW IP address: you see a few "80.98.216.80" raw IP addresses instead of "Prohlep" in the [24] history page. Could you tell me, how can I declare, that the dynamical "80.98.216.80" raw IP address in that days are in fact me = "Prohlep"? Simply there was a Wiki-server error, and I was not experienced enough to realise, that I was fallen out of my login, and I simply keeped working and saving page, but did not realise that I am anonymous "80.98.216.80" instead of the well documented "Prohlep". Can I personally as a plain user change that anonymous dynamical IP addresses to my real login name, or an administrator is neede for that?
prohlep ( talk) 17:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
With this an indef blcoks; you meant to block them forever for vandalism only account? What about if one day they want to contribute again what should they do? use thir IP? Make new account?-- Freewayguy Msg USC 19:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Actually whats open proxy and zombie mean? Same as sockpuppet?-- Freewayguy Msg USC 21:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)