Because of vandals and illegitimate users posting messages to my talkpage, my talkpage has been protected and redirects you to post your message on the IP subpage. If you are a legitimate IP user attempting to contact me, my apologies, and I will be as prompt as I can in responding to your messages. --
Amanda (she/her) |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I keep getting blocked, unblocked, reblocked, and unblocked again for vandalism someone on my IP committed. I don't know why this is happening, but I think you originally banned it? Thanks. 107.0.17.203 ( talk) 15:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)107.0.17.203
Hi DQ. Just wanted to thank you for moving my comment to your talk page. Hope everything works out OK. Best regards. 64.40.54.192 ( talk) 00:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Cia'sPeeingpussy should be blocked because their username is a violation of the username policy. Thanks! Give the reason "{{UsernameHardBlocked}}". 216.55.112.115 ( talk) 17:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Mind taking a peek at this? It seems he's at it again. Rusted AutoParts 03:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Sadfatandalone ( talk) 20:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
On the DeltaQuadBot page, there are two unedited messages by IP users. Please respond to them. 86.159.13.142 ( talk) 09:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
It was backed up by reliable sources that Black Lives Matter is anti-Semitic: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.58.55.220 ( talk) 15:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
As per his previous blocks due to sock puppetry, the above IP has made the same edits as his original and sock accounts. Right now, as I tagged one of his talk page creations for deletion (CSD G5), he suddenly removed it immediately without clicking the button. I suspect the IP to be a sock of Janagewen. Can you please block him? Very appreciated. 66.87.65.145 ( talk) 02:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I was looking through the Amber Heard page, and noticed some info on her personal life and events including domestic violence are not updated, and since you were the last user to update this page, I thought I'd tell you to check it out.
https://people.com/movies/amber-heard-not-silenced-johnny-depp-claims-accusations-hoax/
Some articles worth noting.
Thanks!
-Ale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyaxx ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you have protected Wilma Archer ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) since 7 March 2020. Since the COI editors (Ottosherman, Frankiegrimes, Rubix1234, and FrancisTheHelping) got indefinitely blocked as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ottosherman, I would like to request the article unprotected. 124.87.179.159 ( talk) 05:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello. In Special:MobileDiff/960277986 in which your bot sended a message to SQL, it said "agian" instead of "again". Can you fix that typo please? -- 107.242.113.2 ( talk) 02:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Amanda!
You asked me to send you a list with valid links for 'Naked and Funny' article (for restoring it).
As the article said the Naked and Funny show was sold in 40 countries. Some links about it are below:
Kingly ask to check it and restore our article (Naked and Funny). In this case we would like to add all links and refresh it with new facts. Also it could be better if we could add this article to this page: /info/en/?search=Category:Hidden_camera_television_series Thanks in advance. Looking forward for the answer Helena 6666 ( talk) 07:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Amanda @wikipedia/DeltaQuad, In case of Wiki's policy I've prepared links that would comply with the rules.
Kindly ask to restore article as it could help people to find all information about this Show. Thanks in advance! Helena 6666 ( talk) 15:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Log/2020 July 16. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Helena 6666 ( talk) 14:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi AmandaNP! I'm writing directly to you since I see you protected the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan page. I'm not sure if SPI is the best venue for this, but Keywan faramarzi is evading a block with a new account Keywankomala. The new account created what appears to be an autobiography at Kayvan Faramarzi. @ AmandaNP:
On June 25, 2020 Sportstir was suspended [1] for edit warring with me and especially ISS246 in the Industrial and Organizational Psychology Article.
I haven't worked much on that article for the past year, but when I made a few edits on September 29, they immediately reverted them and demanded I discuss on the talk page, although I posted a detailed explanation in the edit summary. This is the same edit warring pattern as in 2020--revert another editor's edit, demand discussion on the talk page, argue on the talk page, and then continue to revert the edits. You can see here their latest string of reverts at the top of the history for the article [2]
Because this is a continuation of the earlier edit warring case, I was hoping you could look into it.
By the way, I believe Sportstir is a sockpuppet. There have been several sockpuppets by the same person blocked who engaged in exactly the same behavior in this article (Patricia Moorhead) [3] and the Psychology article (BrokenRecordsAgain) [4].
Thank you for your assistance. Psyc12 ( talk) 11:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, can I get my membership back? I don't have another account. Please allow me to return to Wikipedia. I hope the decision is not too harsh. I just hope to cancel the ban on my membership, and I promise I will not publish an article again. I swear to you, I don't have another account. Please understand and reconsider. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.238.131.109 ( talk) 11:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for the ping(s) and thank you for letting me know what I was doing (I didn't realise I was sending notifications). Anyway, I am checking some old talk page protections. In your case this is about the relatively recent Talk:International Court of Justice, Talk:World Bank and Talk:International Monetary Fund, the only thing that looked out of place is that the corresponding articles aren't protected anymore and I wasn't sure yet, if these ones really needed some consideration. I am rechecking the list from time to time, so if you decide to remove some protections (or to add them to the articles) I will consider them already dealt with and there's no need to reply, otherwise it would be nice if you let me know that the matter was already considered, here or on my talk page. Thank you and sorry again for the disturb and the confusion. 176.247.159.174 ( talk) 20:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Amanda. Another in a long string of sockpuppets arose today on Sundayclose's talk page. Questionsandanswer is continuing the personal attacks on me and ISS246, making the same arguments they have been making for years. Can you help? Thanks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Sundayclose&diff=1052798635&oldid=1052798523 Psyc12 ( talk) 23:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Mined Youtsc RS Creator and Owner YoutacrsVARs ( talk) 12:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
how was your day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.153.230.213 ( talk) 03:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Amanda, could you please have a look at this user’s talk page and contributions and decide if their talk page access should be revoked please? This user is here since January, but almost every single edits in Wikipedia:Sandbox have been edited 171 times, according to WP:PGAME (who was blocked). Most of this user's contributions while blocked have been focused around on talk page edits, but they focused on unconstructive edits and a spam account. This editor doesn't seem to understand the purpose of Wikipedia (i.e. it's not a host for stuff they've made up) and they seem to lack the competence to edit here constructively. There's also a load of edits by this user which will need cleaning up. Thanks, BeeSpeed1989 ( talk) 22:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
These have remained protected for about 4.5 years after some kind of outbreaks in July and September 2018. Do you believe it's still necessary? All three are subjects of legitimate interest, and FAQs/edit notices can be used (maybe) to manage traffic from would-be correspondents with the article subjects. 67.180.143.89 ( talk) 02:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
ip blocked Ludoke ( talk) 16:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I was blocked for fixing a typo.. So odd, didn't know anyone took Wikipedia so seriously to block people for free. Esquivelmichelle ( talk) 07:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Because of vandals and illegitimate users posting messages to my talkpage, my talkpage has been protected and redirects you to post your message on the IP subpage. If you are a legitimate IP user attempting to contact me, my apologies, and I will be as prompt as I can in responding to your messages. --
Amanda (she/her) |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes later this week
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
I keep getting blocked, unblocked, reblocked, and unblocked again for vandalism someone on my IP committed. I don't know why this is happening, but I think you originally banned it? Thanks. 107.0.17.203 ( talk) 15:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)107.0.17.203
Hi DQ. Just wanted to thank you for moving my comment to your talk page. Hope everything works out OK. Best regards. 64.40.54.192 ( talk) 00:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Cia'sPeeingpussy should be blocked because their username is a violation of the username policy. Thanks! Give the reason "{{UsernameHardBlocked}}". 216.55.112.115 ( talk) 17:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Mind taking a peek at this? It seems he's at it again. Rusted AutoParts 03:39, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Sadfatandalone ( talk) 20:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
On the DeltaQuadBot page, there are two unedited messages by IP users. Please respond to them. 86.159.13.142 ( talk) 09:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
It was backed up by reliable sources that Black Lives Matter is anti-Semitic: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.58.55.220 ( talk) 15:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
As per his previous blocks due to sock puppetry, the above IP has made the same edits as his original and sock accounts. Right now, as I tagged one of his talk page creations for deletion (CSD G5), he suddenly removed it immediately without clicking the button. I suspect the IP to be a sock of Janagewen. Can you please block him? Very appreciated. 66.87.65.145 ( talk) 02:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I was looking through the Amber Heard page, and noticed some info on her personal life and events including domestic violence are not updated, and since you were the last user to update this page, I thought I'd tell you to check it out.
https://people.com/movies/amber-heard-not-silenced-johnny-depp-claims-accusations-hoax/
Some articles worth noting.
Thanks!
-Ale — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyaxx ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you have protected Wilma Archer ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) since 7 March 2020. Since the COI editors (Ottosherman, Frankiegrimes, Rubix1234, and FrancisTheHelping) got indefinitely blocked as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ottosherman, I would like to request the article unprotected. 124.87.179.159 ( talk) 05:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello. In Special:MobileDiff/960277986 in which your bot sended a message to SQL, it said "agian" instead of "again". Can you fix that typo please? -- 107.242.113.2 ( talk) 02:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Amanda!
You asked me to send you a list with valid links for 'Naked and Funny' article (for restoring it).
As the article said the Naked and Funny show was sold in 40 countries. Some links about it are below:
Kingly ask to check it and restore our article (Naked and Funny). In this case we would like to add all links and refresh it with new facts. Also it could be better if we could add this article to this page: /info/en/?search=Category:Hidden_camera_television_series Thanks in advance. Looking forward for the answer Helena 6666 ( talk) 07:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Amanda @wikipedia/DeltaQuad, In case of Wiki's policy I've prepared links that would comply with the rules.
Kindly ask to restore article as it could help people to find all information about this Show. Thanks in advance! Helena 6666 ( talk) 15:00, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Log/2020 July 16. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Helena 6666 ( talk) 14:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi AmandaNP! I'm writing directly to you since I see you protected the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan page. I'm not sure if SPI is the best venue for this, but Keywan faramarzi is evading a block with a new account Keywankomala. The new account created what appears to be an autobiography at Kayvan Faramarzi. @ AmandaNP:
On June 25, 2020 Sportstir was suspended [1] for edit warring with me and especially ISS246 in the Industrial and Organizational Psychology Article.
I haven't worked much on that article for the past year, but when I made a few edits on September 29, they immediately reverted them and demanded I discuss on the talk page, although I posted a detailed explanation in the edit summary. This is the same edit warring pattern as in 2020--revert another editor's edit, demand discussion on the talk page, argue on the talk page, and then continue to revert the edits. You can see here their latest string of reverts at the top of the history for the article [2]
Because this is a continuation of the earlier edit warring case, I was hoping you could look into it.
By the way, I believe Sportstir is a sockpuppet. There have been several sockpuppets by the same person blocked who engaged in exactly the same behavior in this article (Patricia Moorhead) [3] and the Psychology article (BrokenRecordsAgain) [4].
Thank you for your assistance. Psyc12 ( talk) 11:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, can I get my membership back? I don't have another account. Please allow me to return to Wikipedia. I hope the decision is not too harsh. I just hope to cancel the ban on my membership, and I promise I will not publish an article again. I swear to you, I don't have another account. Please understand and reconsider. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.238.131.109 ( talk) 11:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, sorry for the ping(s) and thank you for letting me know what I was doing (I didn't realise I was sending notifications). Anyway, I am checking some old talk page protections. In your case this is about the relatively recent Talk:International Court of Justice, Talk:World Bank and Talk:International Monetary Fund, the only thing that looked out of place is that the corresponding articles aren't protected anymore and I wasn't sure yet, if these ones really needed some consideration. I am rechecking the list from time to time, so if you decide to remove some protections (or to add them to the articles) I will consider them already dealt with and there's no need to reply, otherwise it would be nice if you let me know that the matter was already considered, here or on my talk page. Thank you and sorry again for the disturb and the confusion. 176.247.159.174 ( talk) 20:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Amanda. Another in a long string of sockpuppets arose today on Sundayclose's talk page. Questionsandanswer is continuing the personal attacks on me and ISS246, making the same arguments they have been making for years. Can you help? Thanks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Sundayclose&diff=1052798635&oldid=1052798523 Psyc12 ( talk) 23:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Mined Youtsc RS Creator and Owner YoutacrsVARs ( talk) 12:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
how was your day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.153.230.213 ( talk) 03:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Amanda, could you please have a look at this user’s talk page and contributions and decide if their talk page access should be revoked please? This user is here since January, but almost every single edits in Wikipedia:Sandbox have been edited 171 times, according to WP:PGAME (who was blocked). Most of this user's contributions while blocked have been focused around on talk page edits, but they focused on unconstructive edits and a spam account. This editor doesn't seem to understand the purpose of Wikipedia (i.e. it's not a host for stuff they've made up) and they seem to lack the competence to edit here constructively. There's also a load of edits by this user which will need cleaning up. Thanks, BeeSpeed1989 ( talk) 22:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
These have remained protected for about 4.5 years after some kind of outbreaks in July and September 2018. Do you believe it's still necessary? All three are subjects of legitimate interest, and FAQs/edit notices can be used (maybe) to manage traffic from would-be correspondents with the article subjects. 67.180.143.89 ( talk) 02:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
ip blocked Ludoke ( talk) 16:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I was blocked for fixing a typo.. So odd, didn't know anyone took Wikipedia so seriously to block people for free. Esquivelmichelle ( talk) 07:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)