Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Loksmythe was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marlon Hunt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

\\ Loksmythe // ( talk) 22:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, AliM7mdd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! \\ Loksmythe // ( talk) 22:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AliM7mdd ( talk) 03:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello I put citation and every thing I put there was facual and my style is just like any wiki page. Why was it declined

A tag has been placed on Jean Luc Benoit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seawolf35 ^{T-- C} 10:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marlon Hunt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao ( talk) 08:22, 3 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Marlon Hunt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jeraxmoira ( talk) 17:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Jeraxmoira may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' user pages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on user page etiquette. Thank you. clpo13_{( talk)} 18:56, 3 January 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jeraxmoira. Untamed1910 ( talk) 18:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Marlon Hunt while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 08:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello AliM7mdd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marlon Hunt for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

― Blaze Wolf ^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 03:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlon Hunt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon Hunt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

― Blaze Wolf ^Talk_{blaze__wolf} 03:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ISKA (sports governing body), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Oleinik. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Julian Lane (Fighter) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Fram ( talk) 14:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Julian Lane (fighter). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a unsourced biography of a living person. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Eternal Shadow Talk 07:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on James Gallagher (fighter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Gallagher (fighter) (3rd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for personal attacks and disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 18:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

• I was of the mind of temporarily preventing you from editing main space due to continual removal of deletion tags, as well as possibly editing while logged out. Having seen this edit, though, I thought a site wide block would be more appropriate. Be warned that if you do something like that again, the next block will be indefinite. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 18:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Tate, you may be blocked from editing.

• You're recent edits [1] and [2] (effectively reverting the changes made by @ Tollens) have already been reverted twice before as the data is unsourced. @ DFlhb already reverted your previous edits [3]. Please seek consensus on the talk page and avoid edit warring.

• Please see reference of previous discussion regarding Tate's fighting record here, then make edits which reliable sources support.

CommunityNotesContributor ( talk) 11:43, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Tate.

• You're latest edits [4] [5] are engaging in edit warring. You have ignored advise to seek consensus and continue to use unreliable sources to make edits such as WP:SPORTSKEEDA. Am pinging admin here who previously blocked you last week @ Isabelle Belato.

CommunityNotesContributor ( talk) 15:22, 13 January 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jiří Žák, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page It's Showtime.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Marlon Hunt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon Hunt. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 12:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please read Help:Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Wikishovel ( talk) 07:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Mike Mathetha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Drowssap SMM 14:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Mathetha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Mathetha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cassiopeia talk 00:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miroslav Cingel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Cingel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cassiopeia talk 00:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Gibson (kickboxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Gibson (kickboxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cassiopeia talk 00:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vincent Petitjean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vincent Petitjean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cassiopeia talk 00:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Luc Benoît is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Luc Benoît until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Cassiopeia talk 00:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Vincent Petitjean. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 03:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Miroslav Cingel. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 03:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Scott Gibson (kickboxer), you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 03:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Jean-Luc Benoît. Cassiopeia talk 03:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Vincent Petitjean. Cassiopeia talk 05:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Jean-Luc Benoît. Cassiopeia talk 05:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Miroslav Cingel. Cassiopeia talk 05:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Scott Gibson (kickboxer). Cassiopeia talk 05:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Vincent Petitjean. Cassiopeia talk 08:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Jean-Luc Benoît. Cassiopeia talk 08:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Scott Gibson (kickboxer). Cassiopeia talk 08:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Miroslav Cingel. Cassiopeia talk 08:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Miroslav Cingel. Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 10:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at User:Fanfanboy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikishovel ( talk) 12:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wikishovel ( talk) 12:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   El_C 12:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply