This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I saw your post, and strictly speaking I should have used 2001:8003:1026:200::/64 as the IPv6 range.
Here are the instructions to see these IPv6 range contributions. Go to your "preferences", then select the "Gadgets" table, then enable "Splark". Then go to Special:Contributions and type, for example, "2001:8003:1026:200:*" in the "User" field. The asterisk is a wildcard. You will see plenty of edits introducing bogus information if you restrict the date range to the last few days. Ttwaring ( talk) 02:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.This IP editor is once again overlinking to the point of disruption and is not willing to explain their edits and continues to be disruptive after being warned several times. Would you consider blocking them again? Thanks. 89.114.83.66 ( talk) 17:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Can you please clarify what the copy right problem was? I made an error weeks ago when I first edited wiki but have since learned better how wiki works. I currently have 2 pics that I have uploaded that I took myself so I'm very confused where the copy right problem is. Thank you for any info you can provide. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 01:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I have tried to have discussions and have in turn been falsely accused of stealing pics or violating rules. Yes, I did make an error weeks ago when I first was becoming familiar with wiki but have since learned from that. I am simply trying to post a better and more flattering picture than the one's others are using from Wonder Con. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 02:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
When I'm not falsely accused of stealing then I am ignored when I try to talk about the pics being used. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 02:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I have tried to open a discussion with C. Fred and did not receive a response. I did not open a conversation with Ringerfan23 until it was suggested by you. The reason being, I had seen Ringerfan23 convo with C. Fred and they did not appear to be open to discussion or compromise. I only want a flattering, legal pic posted of Mr. Croasdell. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 02:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Douma chemical attack. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. A user by the name of Karamellpudding1999 has been edit warring with Hayman30 and now an IP editor at One Kiss (song) using an unreliable source to cite a genre (the source appears to quote Reddit fan comments about the song). They have been warned and blatantly broken WP:3RR. Can you maybe have a word/take appropriate action? Thanks. Ss 112 15:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey just a heads up that OneClickArchiver is sending things you archive that way to /Archive 1 rather than the most recent. I think changing the numberstart parameter might fix that (not sure, however, since it may require using MiszaBot rather than cluebot). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, it looks like the rangeblock on the IP removing numbers from year spans might have been a bit ineffective...they're back on 2600:1700:9a70:7ac0:b5b9:957:adc4:6799 this time. Ss 112 08:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. I recently edited Darren Watson and made quite a few formatting fixes and removed what I thought were copyright-violating album covers. Now I see a user by the name of "Darren Watson NZ" has been editing the page for several years and uploaded the covers themselves. They reverted me today with this ranty edit summary "THESE ARE MY ALBUMS AND MY IMAGES LEAVE THEM ALONE", but honestly, there's no real way of verifying that this is them. Even if it is, I really don't think 10 or so album covers is necessary on the article to illustrate their albums. Either way, the previous formatting on the album article was terrible and they restored it, so I undid it. There may be a WP:COI here and they seem to think they have some superior say in what happens on the page. Ss 112 09:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
If what I'm doing with the redirect is so wrong then why the hell is this acceptable?. These guys clearly went through no proper deletion steps for this article, yet they're still fighting to keep it a redirect. Second Skin ( talk) 10:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, the seems to be back on 122.173.197.64 ( talk · contribs). Maybe we need a range block. Thanks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 17:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm confused by your edit here. As you know, it is extremely common for editors to leave messages of support for fellow editors who have left Wikipedia or have been blocked, for example here, and here. Given that previous "tributes" have been allowed on the very same talk page (see archives), including comments left by some of your admin colleagues, I am unsure why you are making an exception here and would be interested to know your reasons. In the meantime, I'm restoring the material but will archive it as has been done for previous comments. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 20:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
For whatever reason, you adding the cn tags to Walmart was not immediately verified as an ok pending change (despite you being an admin), and it was bunched together with some promotional edits, so I had to deny the edits from reaching your page. Do you have any idea why the edits were bunched together like that? 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 14:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
To elaborate, I undid them because they were poorly phrased and incorrectly sourced. 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 14:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. I've come across a user by the name of NewsAgentEU, who's been editing Mall (song), Albania's entry in Eurovision this year. They've made extensive contributions to the article but recently got into a bit of an edit war with the user Sar2de, telling them to not "make unwarranted edits to this Wikipedia article!" and then "This is the last warning message to you! Do not make edits on this Wikipedia article or you will be reported to the Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee." Which seems like a case of OWN to me and a silly threat. They were restoring an iTunes chart position, which should not be in Wikipedia articles anyway per WP:SINGLEVENDOR. Then I got to looking and thought that this user seems like they might have a bit of a COI as they seem quite consumed with the article. Can you have a word to them? I'll keep a look out on the article to see if they try to restore the iTunes peak again. Ss 112 06:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
I just read about Russell Simmons on Wikipedia. It says he has sexual allegations against him.
If this has not been said, then let me be the first to say, that there is no reason for Wikipedia to post incorrect non-proven information about someone unless it is becoming a negative structure and is creating a pattern of thought incorrect or not. The information is belittling, more than likely untrue and should be removed.
I want to be one to bring to the attention of All Def Digital and the entire family... The Courts and the Judicial System is a fluke! I'm paying extremely close attention to what's happening to some of our great leaders, and I've found something of the same nature happening to myself. I am being accused of a crime that I didn't commit. Police, attorneys, and government are backing it up, as if I've actually committed a crime, however, I have not been advised of the charges against me, and these people are guiding my life into a crash. I'm just about to lose everything because of a lie the someone else told, on me. The allegations are assault. Now, here is what I know, for every action there is honestly and truly a reaction. My action was literally protecting myself, by taking pictures of a dirty home, against a member of the US armed forces, and a certified nurse, two government employees. What is the correlation? I'm being lied on for not giving someone what they want. Other's, police who will devise a congruent strategy, along with government are going against me to cause my issues. I believe wholeheartedly that Russell Simmons is being forced to give up his fortune due to people not receiving something from Russell that they want. I believe there is a bonafide reason that the allegations against Russell are false and urge you to stay true to Russell and his movements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prentice B Johnson ( talk • contribs) 22:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, looks like we have a credit blanker who's registered for an account named "Credits right", removing what looks like all other songwriters from Ne-Yo articles. Ss 112 08:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Binksternet is this someone who is currently blocked? - Ad Orientem ( talk) 13:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, looks like Giubbotto non ortodosso is back with an IP at Chris Brown discography making the same changes as always. Can you protect the page again? Thanks. Also, I'm starting to think the IP that's still being disruptive at Control (Janet Jackson album) is MariaJaydHicky. It's an R&B topic, they're thinking their edits are a-okay with a source...definitely their M.O. Ss 112 14:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Does this count as a personal attack? It's just entirely out of nowhere. I know you're not involved in the discussion, but Walter is calling me a liar because he seems to be forgetting that on this very talk page alone, he has mentioned AllMusic more than any other source that might say "producer". It's a fact, as anybody can see if they use the "find" function on their browser on the page, type in AllMusic and see how many come up in Walter's replies. Ss 112 04:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, I've found another block evader. It took me this long to realise that the user Dracoijui is the same editor behind Phantasus Magician and their long line of socks blanking/removing/adding entries from EDM acts' discographies. They don't stop even after being reverted or warned. Phantasus Magician and their socks also used to try to disguise themselves using my edit summaries ("Updated."), and they're back doing this when they're clearly not just updating something. Ss 112 04:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, I was wondering if you could increase the page protection for Camila Cabello discography from pending changes to semi-protection. The pending changes protection doesn't appear to be stopping IPs from attempting to change the page, and it's annoying to have to revert their changes. It's happened three times since I requested protection yesterday. IP editors are blanking credits because they disagree with them being included over and over. Ss 112 18:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:President's Call to Service Award. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. In doing NPP today, I noticed an oddity. All of a sudden there was a spurt of new articles created about things to do with Rostov-On Don. The oddity is that they are by several different new editors. Not sure if this is a case of sockpuppetry, and don't know if there is a way to check to see if there is an editor who has recently been blocked who wrote on this topic, but I thought I perhaps might need to bring it to an admin's attention, and you were the lucky pick . Here are some of the articles/editors:
There might be others, but these were done pretty close together. And I'm not saying there is anything wrong with the articles, some are thinly sourced, others are of unsure notability, but several were well done. Not sure how, or if, to proceed. Thoughts? Onel5969 TT me 17:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Ad. The user you indeffed few days ago (User:NickNikio) is back with a new account (User:Jackson wang31). He created User:Jackson wang31/sandbox which is linked from Nick Joong's IG page that has previously linked Nicknikio's sandbox. — Z0 ( talk) 18:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
My name is Alexander Hayward and I have recently been elected as the General Secretary for Student Theatre At Glasgow (STAG) a Student led theatre company at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. Our society has existed as STAG since 1994 and before that as far back as the 1960’s as Glasgow University theatre and we also have some performance records from 1922. I have recently realised that the Wikipedia page for our organisation has been deleted and while my primary concern is retrieving the information which was on it as it contains specific details which I no longer have access too I would also like to try and restore the page if possible? We are one of the university oldest non-sports society and certainly the oldest running performance based society, I would really appreciate it if we could find a way to resolve whatever issue led to the pages deletion.
Many thanks and Kind Regards, Alexander Hayward, STAG General Secretary — Preceding unsigned comment added by STAG Gensec ( talk • contribs) 09:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
"The worst calamity to strike Ireland since the Great Famine. The loss of life is likely to be incalculable." etc
You know better than this mate. You of all people should know what discussions should be like at ITN/C and this is not it.
Nixinova
T
C 20:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey AO, hope you're having a good vacation. When you're back for a bit, can you maybe block 2600:1003:b128:d305:307a:f835:b10d:a193 for a bit? Geolocates to the same area of the US BlaccCrab is from, and speaks like him. Same topics, same edits. Thanks. Ss 112 22:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello there, I’m not sure why you’ve blocked me from editing. I was already informed that pictures I uploaded several weeks ago would be removed because they didn’t meet requirements. This has now happened and I haven’t uploaded more. I was looking thru available photos in the Commons to replace them, when I was blocked.
....It would be a shame to think this ultimately came about because you looked at my user page and found things that differed from yours that you didn’t agree with. That would be unfortunate.
Thanks, Clarawolfe ( talk) 10:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC) Clarawolfe ( talk) 10:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore Airlines destinations. Legobot ( talk) 07:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Using 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:AA. Ss 112 01:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
This user continue to violate 3-RR and keep edit warring misconduct. Please care to check? Special:Contributions/OxfordLaw Mr.User200 ( talk) 13:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
You may want to remove talk page access of Addisu mamo [3]. [4] Hummerrocket (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
173.69.144.245 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
It looks like BlaccCrab ( talk · contribs) is back to using this IP again pretty much immediately after your 3 month block on them expired. Could you block them again? Thanks. 37.106.180.252 ( talk) 04:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ad, I've been going through Middle Eastern Countries in light of the recent AE thread about Jordan. The consensus there was that the article on the whole country was broadly but not reasonably construed to be in the ARPIA topic area (there is apparently a difference: the committee imposed sanctions are reasonably construed while discretionary sanctions are broadly construed.)
Anyway, the two other Arab countries I found that were under ECP were Saudi Arabia and Lebanon. I took Lebanon to AN ( see thread) and the emerging consensus there is that the Lebanon page is outside of the restrictions. I've read over the Saudi article again, and I think it probably is too. My gut here says that the only two country/national entity articles at this time that are under the restrictions should be Israel and State of Palestine, but that is obviously my gut and not consensus.
Anyway, would you mind reviewing your protection there and telling me what you think? If you'd rather test consensus at AE or AN, I'm also fine with that. I'm just trying to get some semblance of uniformity in that area TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. Looks like Patricia CV ( talk · contribs) is targeting Janet Jackson topics this time (which they have edited before) as Rizzy Ocean. Same type of edits (deciding what is a full single and what is promotional according to their own whims) and summaries. Ss 112 08:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
An editor named Samuelmarthouse have been adding unsourced content in the article Under Pressure [5], and made this uncivil edit summary after I reverted the edits [6]. The editor keep adding unsourced content in the article with another account [7] [8]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 22:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Unable to create her page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovedove2019 ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Can you move the article in draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovedove2019 ( talk • contribs) 16:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I reported this dynamic IP user yesterday (unfortunately there was no reaction), because I noticed, that smaller range had already been blocked [9]. Single IPs were blocked, but it wasn't helpful. Please verify his conributions. Most of his edits are vandalism and hoax. A few more days, and he will turn Wikipedia upside down. Regards. Cynko ( talk) 07:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help at WP:AIV! It looks like it's been a bit since an admin looked at WP:RPP. If you're comfortable, would you mind taking a look? Regardless, thanks for your help fighting vandalism!-- Policy Reformer (c) 04:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
I guess Prabharirajasthan needs to be dealt in the same manner as Piyushmishra420420.Best, ∯WBG converse 05:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, an IP requested page protection of Everything Is Love at WP:RFPP, and also filed an SPI report for Fanfrom1990, who definitely looks like a MariaJaydHicky sock edit warring. Ss 112 09:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
It is my humble request, not to delete the page titled "Amity School of Engineering & Technology, Kolkata". We have the page for our University and now we want to develop a page for its Engineering School. Which will help people to understand more about the school which is offering engineering courses. Please help us.
Thanks for the thanks . Regarding the SPI I created here, I am embarrassingly unfamiliar with SPI. Per the IPs comment about triggering the edit filter, how do I move the page to be under the correct master RJCola? HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 05:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Welcome back from your vacation, AO! I would like to establish a new subject on the Southern aristocracy, but the page currently redirects to Plantations in the American South. How does one go about this? Am I to delete the redirect and begin contributing, or does the current page need deleting before the page can be used for content? – Conservatrix ( talk) 06:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Though reliable sources often employ the term "aristocracy," I could alternatively use Planter class to avoid its pointed nature. – Conservatrix ( talk) 07:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Ah! I near forgot! Had you noticed that our muse, the Mad Monarchist, has left his writing for new adventures? – Conservatrix ( talk) 08:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
That CSD (G6) is done. – Conservatrix ( talk) 22:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Can we use Template:Cite thesis to credit unpublished manuscripts? Are manuscript citations allowed? – Conservatrix ( talk) 01:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Disruptive editing at the article by IPs – probably the same person using various IPs: 109.161.146.252, 94.76.21.51, 109.161.172.33, 62.209.14.226 and 109.161.146.179. This editor keeps adding incorrect information by changing the date of the certification without explaining why. For example, in the RIAA database, it says June 8 not June 20. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 16:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi AO, can you maybe ask Bbb23 to run a CheckUser on a series of rather annoying editors? One is Clovaspark9, another is Margiela Yakimono, and I believe there have been a number of other (all registered accounts with red usernames) connected, but I have forgotten what these are (hence why CheckUser may be helpful). They update charts, often supplying unreliable ones, and continue adding/restoring these even after having it explained to them that said charts are on WP:BADCHARTS or are single-network charts ( WP:SINGLENETWORK). Clovaspark9 is also another editor who never responds to talk page messages to supply accurate accessdates (of course, this is not a blockable offence in and of itself). Clovaspark9 also often updates the same charts Margiela Yakimono does, so it's quite suspect. Thanks. Ss 112 17:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
I added some references to Anurag Arora and added a heading for the list of roles. I think he might be notable. You might want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anurag Arora Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
hi ad orientum i posted the comprehensive entry on Bruce Milne that you have just deleted. i am not a fervent wiki contributor but an aust music biz insider who likes to correct things when they strike me as egregiously wrong. (this happened when i tried to correct the entry Aust Pub Rock which was so plain wrong it was just a joke, but my corrections/expensions were removed too and at that time i had neither the time now inclination to re-correct. but in this instance...) the entry on Bruce Milne as far as i could tell did what wiki asked - i.e., insert references. it is full of references. i don't think i need to try and justify the article, as opposed to being pulled down because it's advertising or promotion, the article justified itself in its content and the several dozen references present, i have vested interest in this living person and so i can't understand why the biography has been pulled down. i think the deletion is an error the same as the removal of my rewrite of the Aus Pub Rock entry, which is an appalling mistake. i'll take the trouble now i'm thinking about it to add something to that pub rock talk page, if this is the right way, i hope, for me to be making these asks, with thanks Flamippo ( talk) 01:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
hi ad. thanks for this. i think i get it. a lot less declamatory, just the facts. so okay, i'll give it another run through at some point in the near future when i've got time. although i do think the references are every bit as credible as references i see in other wiki pages. thing is, i could have cited published books in which this subject is discussed but wasn't sure how to cite books without a URL. but i've run out of time on this for the meantime, with thanks Flamippo ( talk) 21:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
oh and the other thing was, it was just an unfortunate typo that it read i have vested interests, it should have read i have NO vested interests Flamippo ( talk) 21:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I would request to undelete the Wikipedia page Sunteck Realty, because It passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines under WP:NCORP, WP:LISTED and WP:GNG.
The article was well referenced, verifiable and complying the Wikipedia's Policy. It would be unfair to delete under Speedy delete. If you still believe that the article is not Notable, I would say Article for deletion process would be best way to reach any consensus.Thank you.-- Eramritasharma ( talk) 15:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the warning on his talk. Any chance you'd take a look at the report he just made at ANEW? Thanks. John from Idegon ( talk) 00:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
( edit conflict):Thanks again. Any possibility you'd try to explain BRD to him? If you read his emotional responses in his talk, you'll see clearly he's not grasping some very basic notions, such as OR. He's also apparently pretty blinded by COI as his talk page makes clear. There's been a history of "be true to my school" editing on this article, and at least one other school article regular, Meters, is aware of it. I'm just gonna piss this dude off further, so I'm not gonna do anything for at least a day. Hopefully Meters will pick it up later. Have a good morning or evening or whatever it is where you are. John from Idegon ( talk) 01:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I know you userfied this in trying to help me, but it's actually causing more harm. People are threatening to request speedy deletes on it, and I'm getting hammered on because the image that was on it when it was in the mainspace was non-free use uploaded. If you unuserfy it, I'd really appreciate it, as it was a viable article beforehand, and I've added to it since, so I'd much prefer it as it was, given that I was harrassed for it before. THis is only one of many times I've gotten this kind of treatment since joining Wikipedia, and I'm almost at the point of quitting. Please help. Thanks, Fhsig13 ( talk) 04:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
I think it is an interesting suggestion, though I am not too sure that the community would be open to it. Perhaps worth an RfC some day? -- TheSandDoctor Talk 01:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I've been noticing that as well, though I'm not sure it's as sudden as you seem to think — so far, this entire year has been an unprecedented barrage of pushback against WP:NPOL. A lot more candidates are trying to get Wikipedia articles than usual (I don't remember even 2016 being this bad!), and a lot more editors than ever are trying to drown the notion that campaign coverage in and of itself shouldn't be enough to get a person over WP:GNG. Try pointing out that every candidate always gets enough coverage to technically pass GNG if campaign coverage itself were automatically enough to pass GNG in and of itself, or try pointing out that Wikipedia's standard is the ten-year test for permanent significance and not the every single person who happens to get into the news today test, and people just stick their fingers in their ears and repeat that their candidate has enough campaign coverage to clear GNG — and try raising WP:BLP1E, and you get the response that an election is somehow not an event. Which, er, yes, it is.
It's tiresome, and I'm extremely fed up with it — if we don't hold "candidates do not get to use Wikipedia as a platform for their campaign brochures" as the bright red line that NPOL does not erase, then we may as well just fold up. Our value as a project depends on having standards for how a person becomes notable enough to get in here, and what their article has to look and sound like, and how it has to be referenced — without those, we're just Ballotpedia x LinkedIn, not a proper encyclopedia anymore. But what to do about it, I simply don't know. Bearcat ( talk) 05:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi can you please block IHateWalter666 and Fuckwalter? The former one is vandalising Walter Bustamante and the latter one is a sock I suppose. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk to me) 05:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I never said nor hinted that editors should be penalized, that I my edits are not neutral, nor that I have an agenda (as does the "Sovereign citizen movement" page). The data I provided is backed by the stated sources - current law, .... I have said over and over that, as you said, "Sovereign citizens lacks balance or fails". Content disputes by majority vote do NOT change the information to a truth. Majority rules does not = reality. My political views are not the subject nor have I given any. The "other side" of the sovereign citizen is all I provided backed by actual current law (see below). Nothing "odd" here except the emotional and exaggerated responses to my evidence and comments.
Long List
|
---|
|
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgojoey ( talk • contribs) 21:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
On 2 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gudrun Burwitz, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
You closed the discussion with a no consensus, defaulted to keep. Can you take another look at the decision? The only keep vote is from the article's creator who has less than a hundred minor edits. His rationale for keep is pretty week as well. 2Joules ( talk) 05:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
I am puzzled by your decision and why, frankly, you are granted such authority. Your stated political beliefs lead me to believe you must, repeat MUST, no longer be involved in this process. Your bias is clear. Tim Bjorkman is a lawyer, a judge who served more than a decade on the South Dakota bench, an author, historian and legal scholar and the 2018 Democratic candidate for South Dakota's lone congressional seat. There have been dozens and dozens of media reports on his campaign. He is indeed a newsworthy person. In the page on the campaign, it appears all other candidates have pages. Why were they not deleted? I believe the answer is obvious. Yes, I work for Tim's campaign as communications director. I want to be upfront about that. But as a longtime Wikipedia user, it's clear to me Mr. Bjorkman merits a Wikipedia page -- and you should have no role in deciding if it should exist. Tom Lawrence sdwriter25@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 26SDWriter ( talk • contribs) 19:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
What permission/user rights are required to view logs of deleted pages? I want to check who created a couple of pages I AFD'ed, but even though I watchlisted them, I am unable to view the history. I hold only extended confirmed rights. Which user rights should I apply for in order to view creation logs?
Hello I am asking that the Jeffrey Sussman page be restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vintagemovieguy ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Żegota. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ad Orientem! You decided to keep the article about Graham Kentsley referring to lack of consensus. I think, that there was a consensus because all the real users with a real contribution to Wikipedia concurred that the person isn't notable enough for the encyclopedia. The lack of consensus was made only by newly registered users, who are probably associated with Kentsley. Moreover, all their arguments are like "look, he was mentioned in some local tabloid", but I believe that this is not a sufficient reason. So, what do you think about it? Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with the rules of English Wikipedia, so could you please explain me how can I appeal the keeping decision? -- XVodolazx ( talk) 11:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
There are several issues with your close of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toontown. Firstly your close redirect to
Toontown (disambiguation)
should be a nonstarter as that put the pages in the
WP:MALPLACED work queue (which is how I found this close). Secondly, you should have realized that this close
made some 25 pages link to the disambiguation and taken it upon yourself to clean those up rather than leaving the task for some random editor to sort out. Of course, de facto deletion of the article on the topic (without actually deleting it) left nothing to disambiguate these links to, so I removed the links, and made sure that there was a nearby link to
Who Framed Roger Rabbit or a related article, so that the meaning of "Toontown" could still be ascertained by the reader. Thirdly, since this close effectively removed the article from
WP:primary topic status, it became necessary to move the article to a newly disambiguated title. While I was pondering over what title to move the article to, and sleeping on the matter, another editor
filed a technical request to move the malplaced dab page, and administrator
Anthony Appleyard move the redirected article page to
Toontown (version 2) – a title I'm not keen on, but understandable in this case. Fourthly, I question the need for a disambiguation page at all, as all of the items on the dab are Disney-related, excepting "Toontown", a nickname for
Saskatoon
which makes it a
WP:TWODABS situation that could be handled by a hatnote. Checking
Google Ngrams for the date the term originated, I see that it wasn't on the radar until 1985, although there was some obscure usage before then.
Looking at Google Books shows a handful of references that these mostly relate to
Roger Rabbit, as
Who Censored Roger Rabbit? was published in 1981. The
floodgates opened by the early 1990s, following the 1988 release of the film. I don't find the argument that the term fails
WP:GNG very convincing, given all these mentions by multiple independent publications. I think Disney made this a valid topic for a
WP:Broad-concept article – there is a somewhat amorphous relationship between the articles on the disambiguation page. The idea that the article should "Merge with Toontown (disambiguation)" is another nonstarter. We don't merge content into disambiguation pages. This is more an argument for merging the disambiguation into the broad-concept article and deleting Toontown (disambiguation). If this is indeed a valid broad-concept created by Disney, then that negates the need to remove those 25 links to the topic. –
wbm1058 (
talk) 15:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. I have just been waiting since last year for this user to come back in some way, shape or form, and they're back using 208.28.133.202 (they previously used this IP in 2017 with the same snark). I can spot their attitude anywhere. Last year they edit warred over the mere order of singles on ÷ (album) and a slew of other then-recent pop music articles. Now they're back with their snark on recent pop music articles again. You can see (some) of their editing history at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeopleEater143/Archive. It's like they can't edit without writing smart alec edit summaries, for example usually something along the lines of "that's not how it works" and acting like they have final say on everything. Looks like they've been around for a while now with their snark, but I only just spotted them at Palo Santo (Years & Years album). They also edit war like crazy. I'll report any further IP hops to you, because they came back using different usernames and IPs last year when users like myself and Jennica spotted a pattern (Jennica even said that she was sure they frequented a pop music forum she visited and were distinguishable by their attitude there). @ Hayman30: because they appeared to be editing Sweetener (album) quite a bit and you watch that article quite a bit. Can you be on the lookout there? Thanks! Ss 112 00:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ad. Recently, I merged List of England international footballers (alphabetical) to List of England international footballers and later redirected it to the latter per the result of an AFD. Another editor kept undoing the redirect, saying "the result is merge not redirect" but after completing the merge it is normal practice to redirect to the target article. It'll be great if you could take a look. The editor whose username is Z0 21:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, please restore John Humphrey (drummer) rather than redirect to The Nixons. His discography is with both bands. Also member of both bands. Here is one source showing Humphrey joining Seether in 2003.
https://www.mlive.com/entertainment/saginaw/index.ssf/2011/07/seether_on_the_right_track_as.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhdrumr ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
https://www.moderndrummer.com/article/july-2018-seethers-john-humphrey/
https://www.sabian.com/en/artist/john-humphrey
https://www.therockpit.net/2018/interview-john-humphrey-seether/
http://www.goldminemag.com/articles/kiss-collection-is-seether-drummers-pride-and-joy
https://www.axs.com/into-the-pit-interview-with-seether-drummer-john-humphrey-68927
https://amnplify.com.au/portfolio-items/interview-with-john-humphrey-of-seether/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhdrumr ( talk • contribs) 04:00, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
I happened to come across your express lane analogy here. Thanks for the laughs! Noticed their name had a strike-through at Chris Savino and got curious, then I see your funny message. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 16:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey AO, the Drake-loving block-evading editor from Thailand, Tanapot2001, is back using 27.55.99.17 Ss 112 19:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
108.31.98.232 ( talk · contribs) This editor keeps adding false information in the album ratings template in music-related articles [13] [14] [15]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 06:14, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you take a look at the article TITANIIC? (Yes, that's the way it is spelled.) This is another Titanic replica project but by Czech entrepreneur Ondřej Vrkoč. It's flown under the radar here as it is an orphan article. Very hard to evaluate the reliability of the sources as they are mostly in Czech and the English language articles are Wiki mirrors. But from what I can tell it's all self promotion with help from an editor with an apparent COI. The project leader claims a collaboration with QM2 designer Stephen Payne and a business partnership with shipyard STX France. Maybe he spoke with them but an official role in his project is something on another level. As the main editor of Payne's article I don't see somebody with his credentials being associated with a ship that would have numerous SOLAS issues if built in the 1912 form. STX France's site comes up with zero results for a search of "Titaniic".
Given the lack of geographic scope, and difficulty of RS verification, at best this is a merger with Replica Titanic or a straight up AfD. I can merge it but I'd like to get another editor's opinion. Blue Riband► 02:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, a week ago I reverted the user InUser on CeCe Peniston discography for their thinking things don't need to be sourced on Wikipedia, because they seem to be under the impression that some very relative things are "common knowledge". Just half an hour ago, they edited using the IP 89.24.184.201 to revert me twice: once on CeCe Peniston discography and InUser's talk page, both times using the summary I wrote when I reverted InUser's message on my talk page (which is a giveaway it was them). Now, not only that, but InUser seems to have edited several topics related to Jessica Lange. Not coincidentally, the IP address has edited Jessica Lange's awards and nominations page. This seems like a deliberate attempt to make disruptive, spiteful edits/reverts (copying my edit summary) while logged out. Ss 112 11:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey again AO. The editor Drizzy010 ( talk · contribs) mostly edited Drake discography and several Billboard achievement pages; Dalzon9596 is doing exactly the same thing. Same type of edits to Drake discography and editing the other pages Drizzy010 did. Ss 112 16:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, First of all beware I'm a newbie in wikipedia. I tried to get a new page in wikipedia for a non profit called "The Signals Network" that offers protection for whistleblowers. It appeared that the page was instantly marked for deletion : not enough notable sources -- from what I understood. I wanted to improve it but now that it has been removed is there a way I can get my text back in some way? (through some kind of revision history?). /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Signals_Network -- Mathieuleddet ( talk) 09:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, can you expand a little on your rationale for No Consensus? The first Keep !vote uses the term "reliable sources" which is not the criteria for establishing notability. The next doesn't use any policy based arguments. The next also uses "third-party reliable sources" which isn't the criteria. The last states they've added references and posted a requested move. Basically, none of the Keep !voters have provided any indication of the criteria in NCORP. Can you help me understand how you weighted the Yea and Nay !votes? Thank you. HighKing ++ 11:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
I understand that the numerical votes in the discussion (as it was) favored deletion, but I think it is important that as the closer of the AfD, that you add explanation for the close. Most of the delete votes (Nom, Tillerh11, John Paul Lambert) put in their comments before the expansion of the article (now I feel appropriate proclaiming WP:HEY). The argument raised in favor of deletion by SportingFlyer was rejected by Bearcat. And, it is not hard to characterize Mangoe's argument as "only things that happen in big cities are important." But, because AfD is not a vote, but a discussion of policy, I feel that as the closer, you should articulate which rational(s) you based the close upon, rather than a simple "delete."
As Bearcat alluded earlier on your talk page (which I also fully agree with), these AfDs do set precedent (to a degree, as certain arguments are stronger than others). In my concluding comments on the AfD, "there are lots of local mayors" who are similar to the final version of the (now) deleted page, who are mayors of cities with a substantial sized population, whose article is greater than stub length, and whose merits would presumably be debated around the "significant things he did in the position" - as Bearcat mentioned, which is not, traditionally, been a question of this project. -- Enos733 ( talk) 06:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey AO. Basically every day, an IP in the 83.xx.xxx.xxx range is coming back around to Girls Like You and adding a bunch of unreliable charts (listed at WP:BADCHARTS), unsourced or component charts we don't need. Can you maybe protect it for a bit? This 83-range IP is persistent with Maroon 5 articles; they did it previously at What Lovers Do as well. Ss 112 12:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! I was interested to see your close here, and wondered if you had seen the brief discussion at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#Sockpuppet nominations. I'm fully in agreement with you, but I'm not sure that those other editors would be. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, please help me understand why two of our communities have been deleted. Thank-you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rus2er ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I saw your post, and strictly speaking I should have used 2001:8003:1026:200::/64 as the IPv6 range.
Here are the instructions to see these IPv6 range contributions. Go to your "preferences", then select the "Gadgets" table, then enable "Splark". Then go to Special:Contributions and type, for example, "2001:8003:1026:200:*" in the "User" field. The asterisk is a wildcard. You will see plenty of edits introducing bogus information if you restrict the date range to the last few days. Ttwaring ( talk) 02:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.This IP editor is once again overlinking to the point of disruption and is not willing to explain their edits and continues to be disruptive after being warned several times. Would you consider blocking them again? Thanks. 89.114.83.66 ( talk) 17:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Can you please clarify what the copy right problem was? I made an error weeks ago when I first edited wiki but have since learned better how wiki works. I currently have 2 pics that I have uploaded that I took myself so I'm very confused where the copy right problem is. Thank you for any info you can provide. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 01:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I have tried to have discussions and have in turn been falsely accused of stealing pics or violating rules. Yes, I did make an error weeks ago when I first was becoming familiar with wiki but have since learned from that. I am simply trying to post a better and more flattering picture than the one's others are using from Wonder Con. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 02:01, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
When I'm not falsely accused of stealing then I am ignored when I try to talk about the pics being used. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 02:03, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I have tried to open a discussion with C. Fred and did not receive a response. I did not open a conversation with Ringerfan23 until it was suggested by you. The reason being, I had seen Ringerfan23 convo with C. Fred and they did not appear to be open to discussion or compromise. I only want a flattering, legal pic posted of Mr. Croasdell. Sbearfi1 ( talk) 02:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Douma chemical attack. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. A user by the name of Karamellpudding1999 has been edit warring with Hayman30 and now an IP editor at One Kiss (song) using an unreliable source to cite a genre (the source appears to quote Reddit fan comments about the song). They have been warned and blatantly broken WP:3RR. Can you maybe have a word/take appropriate action? Thanks. Ss 112 15:58, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey just a heads up that OneClickArchiver is sending things you archive that way to /Archive 1 rather than the most recent. I think changing the numberstart parameter might fix that (not sure, however, since it may require using MiszaBot rather than cluebot). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, it looks like the rangeblock on the IP removing numbers from year spans might have been a bit ineffective...they're back on 2600:1700:9a70:7ac0:b5b9:957:adc4:6799 this time. Ss 112 08:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. I recently edited Darren Watson and made quite a few formatting fixes and removed what I thought were copyright-violating album covers. Now I see a user by the name of "Darren Watson NZ" has been editing the page for several years and uploaded the covers themselves. They reverted me today with this ranty edit summary "THESE ARE MY ALBUMS AND MY IMAGES LEAVE THEM ALONE", but honestly, there's no real way of verifying that this is them. Even if it is, I really don't think 10 or so album covers is necessary on the article to illustrate their albums. Either way, the previous formatting on the album article was terrible and they restored it, so I undid it. There may be a WP:COI here and they seem to think they have some superior say in what happens on the page. Ss 112 09:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
If what I'm doing with the redirect is so wrong then why the hell is this acceptable?. These guys clearly went through no proper deletion steps for this article, yet they're still fighting to keep it a redirect. Second Skin ( talk) 10:51, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, the seems to be back on 122.173.197.64 ( talk · contribs). Maybe we need a range block. Thanks. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 17:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm confused by your edit here. As you know, it is extremely common for editors to leave messages of support for fellow editors who have left Wikipedia or have been blocked, for example here, and here. Given that previous "tributes" have been allowed on the very same talk page (see archives), including comments left by some of your admin colleagues, I am unsure why you are making an exception here and would be interested to know your reasons. In the meantime, I'm restoring the material but will archive it as has been done for previous comments. jcc ( tea and biscuits) 20:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
For whatever reason, you adding the cn tags to Walmart was not immediately verified as an ok pending change (despite you being an admin), and it was bunched together with some promotional edits, so I had to deny the edits from reaching your page. Do you have any idea why the edits were bunched together like that? 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 14:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
To elaborate, I undid them because they were poorly phrased and incorrectly sourced. 💵Money💵emoji💵 Talk 14:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. I've come across a user by the name of NewsAgentEU, who's been editing Mall (song), Albania's entry in Eurovision this year. They've made extensive contributions to the article but recently got into a bit of an edit war with the user Sar2de, telling them to not "make unwarranted edits to this Wikipedia article!" and then "This is the last warning message to you! Do not make edits on this Wikipedia article or you will be reported to the Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee." Which seems like a case of OWN to me and a silly threat. They were restoring an iTunes chart position, which should not be in Wikipedia articles anyway per WP:SINGLEVENDOR. Then I got to looking and thought that this user seems like they might have a bit of a COI as they seem quite consumed with the article. Can you have a word to them? I'll keep a look out on the article to see if they try to restore the iTunes peak again. Ss 112 06:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
I just read about Russell Simmons on Wikipedia. It says he has sexual allegations against him.
If this has not been said, then let me be the first to say, that there is no reason for Wikipedia to post incorrect non-proven information about someone unless it is becoming a negative structure and is creating a pattern of thought incorrect or not. The information is belittling, more than likely untrue and should be removed.
I want to be one to bring to the attention of All Def Digital and the entire family... The Courts and the Judicial System is a fluke! I'm paying extremely close attention to what's happening to some of our great leaders, and I've found something of the same nature happening to myself. I am being accused of a crime that I didn't commit. Police, attorneys, and government are backing it up, as if I've actually committed a crime, however, I have not been advised of the charges against me, and these people are guiding my life into a crash. I'm just about to lose everything because of a lie the someone else told, on me. The allegations are assault. Now, here is what I know, for every action there is honestly and truly a reaction. My action was literally protecting myself, by taking pictures of a dirty home, against a member of the US armed forces, and a certified nurse, two government employees. What is the correlation? I'm being lied on for not giving someone what they want. Other's, police who will devise a congruent strategy, along with government are going against me to cause my issues. I believe wholeheartedly that Russell Simmons is being forced to give up his fortune due to people not receiving something from Russell that they want. I believe there is a bonafide reason that the allegations against Russell are false and urge you to stay true to Russell and his movements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prentice B Johnson ( talk • contribs) 22:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, looks like we have a credit blanker who's registered for an account named "Credits right", removing what looks like all other songwriters from Ne-Yo articles. Ss 112 08:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
@ Binksternet is this someone who is currently blocked? - Ad Orientem ( talk) 13:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, looks like Giubbotto non ortodosso is back with an IP at Chris Brown discography making the same changes as always. Can you protect the page again? Thanks. Also, I'm starting to think the IP that's still being disruptive at Control (Janet Jackson album) is MariaJaydHicky. It's an R&B topic, they're thinking their edits are a-okay with a source...definitely their M.O. Ss 112 14:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Does this count as a personal attack? It's just entirely out of nowhere. I know you're not involved in the discussion, but Walter is calling me a liar because he seems to be forgetting that on this very talk page alone, he has mentioned AllMusic more than any other source that might say "producer". It's a fact, as anybody can see if they use the "find" function on their browser on the page, type in AllMusic and see how many come up in Walter's replies. Ss 112 04:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, I've found another block evader. It took me this long to realise that the user Dracoijui is the same editor behind Phantasus Magician and their long line of socks blanking/removing/adding entries from EDM acts' discographies. They don't stop even after being reverted or warned. Phantasus Magician and their socks also used to try to disguise themselves using my edit summaries ("Updated."), and they're back doing this when they're clearly not just updating something. Ss 112 04:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, I was wondering if you could increase the page protection for Camila Cabello discography from pending changes to semi-protection. The pending changes protection doesn't appear to be stopping IPs from attempting to change the page, and it's annoying to have to revert their changes. It's happened three times since I requested protection yesterday. IP editors are blanking credits because they disagree with them being included over and over. Ss 112 18:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:President's Call to Service Award. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi. In doing NPP today, I noticed an oddity. All of a sudden there was a spurt of new articles created about things to do with Rostov-On Don. The oddity is that they are by several different new editors. Not sure if this is a case of sockpuppetry, and don't know if there is a way to check to see if there is an editor who has recently been blocked who wrote on this topic, but I thought I perhaps might need to bring it to an admin's attention, and you were the lucky pick . Here are some of the articles/editors:
There might be others, but these were done pretty close together. And I'm not saying there is anything wrong with the articles, some are thinly sourced, others are of unsure notability, but several were well done. Not sure how, or if, to proceed. Thoughts? Onel5969 TT me 17:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Ad. The user you indeffed few days ago (User:NickNikio) is back with a new account (User:Jackson wang31). He created User:Jackson wang31/sandbox which is linked from Nick Joong's IG page that has previously linked Nicknikio's sandbox. — Z0 ( talk) 18:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
My name is Alexander Hayward and I have recently been elected as the General Secretary for Student Theatre At Glasgow (STAG) a Student led theatre company at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. Our society has existed as STAG since 1994 and before that as far back as the 1960’s as Glasgow University theatre and we also have some performance records from 1922. I have recently realised that the Wikipedia page for our organisation has been deleted and while my primary concern is retrieving the information which was on it as it contains specific details which I no longer have access too I would also like to try and restore the page if possible? We are one of the university oldest non-sports society and certainly the oldest running performance based society, I would really appreciate it if we could find a way to resolve whatever issue led to the pages deletion.
Many thanks and Kind Regards, Alexander Hayward, STAG General Secretary — Preceding unsigned comment added by STAG Gensec ( talk • contribs) 09:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
"The worst calamity to strike Ireland since the Great Famine. The loss of life is likely to be incalculable." etc
You know better than this mate. You of all people should know what discussions should be like at ITN/C and this is not it.
Nixinova
T
C 20:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey AO, hope you're having a good vacation. When you're back for a bit, can you maybe block 2600:1003:b128:d305:307a:f835:b10d:a193 for a bit? Geolocates to the same area of the US BlaccCrab is from, and speaks like him. Same topics, same edits. Thanks. Ss 112 22:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello there, I’m not sure why you’ve blocked me from editing. I was already informed that pictures I uploaded several weeks ago would be removed because they didn’t meet requirements. This has now happened and I haven’t uploaded more. I was looking thru available photos in the Commons to replace them, when I was blocked.
....It would be a shame to think this ultimately came about because you looked at my user page and found things that differed from yours that you didn’t agree with. That would be unfortunate.
Thanks, Clarawolfe ( talk) 10:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC) Clarawolfe ( talk) 10:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Singapore Airlines destinations. Legobot ( talk) 07:14, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Using 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:AA. Ss 112 01:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
This user continue to violate 3-RR and keep edit warring misconduct. Please care to check? Special:Contributions/OxfordLaw Mr.User200 ( talk) 13:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
You may want to remove talk page access of Addisu mamo [3]. [4] Hummerrocket (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
173.69.144.245 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
It looks like BlaccCrab ( talk · contribs) is back to using this IP again pretty much immediately after your 3 month block on them expired. Could you block them again? Thanks. 37.106.180.252 ( talk) 04:55, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ad, I've been going through Middle Eastern Countries in light of the recent AE thread about Jordan. The consensus there was that the article on the whole country was broadly but not reasonably construed to be in the ARPIA topic area (there is apparently a difference: the committee imposed sanctions are reasonably construed while discretionary sanctions are broadly construed.)
Anyway, the two other Arab countries I found that were under ECP were Saudi Arabia and Lebanon. I took Lebanon to AN ( see thread) and the emerging consensus there is that the Lebanon page is outside of the restrictions. I've read over the Saudi article again, and I think it probably is too. My gut here says that the only two country/national entity articles at this time that are under the restrictions should be Israel and State of Palestine, but that is obviously my gut and not consensus.
Anyway, would you mind reviewing your protection there and telling me what you think? If you'd rather test consensus at AE or AN, I'm also fine with that. I'm just trying to get some semblance of uniformity in that area TonyBallioni ( talk) 13:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. Looks like Patricia CV ( talk · contribs) is targeting Janet Jackson topics this time (which they have edited before) as Rizzy Ocean. Same type of edits (deciding what is a full single and what is promotional according to their own whims) and summaries. Ss 112 08:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
An editor named Samuelmarthouse have been adding unsourced content in the article Under Pressure [5], and made this uncivil edit summary after I reverted the edits [6]. The editor keep adding unsourced content in the article with another account [7] [8]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 22:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Unable to create her page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovedove2019 ( talk • contribs) 15:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Can you move the article in draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lovedove2019 ( talk • contribs) 16:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I reported this dynamic IP user yesterday (unfortunately there was no reaction), because I noticed, that smaller range had already been blocked [9]. Single IPs were blocked, but it wasn't helpful. Please verify his conributions. Most of his edits are vandalism and hoax. A few more days, and he will turn Wikipedia upside down. Regards. Cynko ( talk) 07:28, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your help at WP:AIV! It looks like it's been a bit since an admin looked at WP:RPP. If you're comfortable, would you mind taking a look? Regardless, thanks for your help fighting vandalism!-- Policy Reformer (c) 04:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:March 1947 martial law in Mandatory Palestine. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
I guess Prabharirajasthan needs to be dealt in the same manner as Piyushmishra420420.Best, ∯WBG converse 05:22, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, an IP requested page protection of Everything Is Love at WP:RFPP, and also filed an SPI report for Fanfrom1990, who definitely looks like a MariaJaydHicky sock edit warring. Ss 112 09:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
It is my humble request, not to delete the page titled "Amity School of Engineering & Technology, Kolkata". We have the page for our University and now we want to develop a page for its Engineering School. Which will help people to understand more about the school which is offering engineering courses. Please help us.
Thanks for the thanks . Regarding the SPI I created here, I am embarrassingly unfamiliar with SPI. Per the IPs comment about triggering the edit filter, how do I move the page to be under the correct master RJCola? HickoryOughtShirt?4 ( talk) 05:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Welcome back from your vacation, AO! I would like to establish a new subject on the Southern aristocracy, but the page currently redirects to Plantations in the American South. How does one go about this? Am I to delete the redirect and begin contributing, or does the current page need deleting before the page can be used for content? – Conservatrix ( talk) 06:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Though reliable sources often employ the term "aristocracy," I could alternatively use Planter class to avoid its pointed nature. – Conservatrix ( talk) 07:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Ah! I near forgot! Had you noticed that our muse, the Mad Monarchist, has left his writing for new adventures? – Conservatrix ( talk) 08:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
That CSD (G6) is done. – Conservatrix ( talk) 22:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Can we use Template:Cite thesis to credit unpublished manuscripts? Are manuscript citations allowed? – Conservatrix ( talk) 01:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Disruptive editing at the article by IPs – probably the same person using various IPs: 109.161.146.252, 94.76.21.51, 109.161.172.33, 62.209.14.226 and 109.161.146.179. This editor keeps adding incorrect information by changing the date of the certification without explaining why. For example, in the RIAA database, it says June 8 not June 20. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 16:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi AO, can you maybe ask Bbb23 to run a CheckUser on a series of rather annoying editors? One is Clovaspark9, another is Margiela Yakimono, and I believe there have been a number of other (all registered accounts with red usernames) connected, but I have forgotten what these are (hence why CheckUser may be helpful). They update charts, often supplying unreliable ones, and continue adding/restoring these even after having it explained to them that said charts are on WP:BADCHARTS or are single-network charts ( WP:SINGLENETWORK). Clovaspark9 is also another editor who never responds to talk page messages to supply accurate accessdates (of course, this is not a blockable offence in and of itself). Clovaspark9 also often updates the same charts Margiela Yakimono does, so it's quite suspect. Thanks. Ss 112 17:26, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
I added some references to Anurag Arora and added a heading for the list of roles. I think he might be notable. You might want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anurag Arora Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
hi ad orientum i posted the comprehensive entry on Bruce Milne that you have just deleted. i am not a fervent wiki contributor but an aust music biz insider who likes to correct things when they strike me as egregiously wrong. (this happened when i tried to correct the entry Aust Pub Rock which was so plain wrong it was just a joke, but my corrections/expensions were removed too and at that time i had neither the time now inclination to re-correct. but in this instance...) the entry on Bruce Milne as far as i could tell did what wiki asked - i.e., insert references. it is full of references. i don't think i need to try and justify the article, as opposed to being pulled down because it's advertising or promotion, the article justified itself in its content and the several dozen references present, i have vested interest in this living person and so i can't understand why the biography has been pulled down. i think the deletion is an error the same as the removal of my rewrite of the Aus Pub Rock entry, which is an appalling mistake. i'll take the trouble now i'm thinking about it to add something to that pub rock talk page, if this is the right way, i hope, for me to be making these asks, with thanks Flamippo ( talk) 01:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
hi ad. thanks for this. i think i get it. a lot less declamatory, just the facts. so okay, i'll give it another run through at some point in the near future when i've got time. although i do think the references are every bit as credible as references i see in other wiki pages. thing is, i could have cited published books in which this subject is discussed but wasn't sure how to cite books without a URL. but i've run out of time on this for the meantime, with thanks Flamippo ( talk) 21:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
oh and the other thing was, it was just an unfortunate typo that it read i have vested interests, it should have read i have NO vested interests Flamippo ( talk) 21:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I would request to undelete the Wikipedia page Sunteck Realty, because It passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines under WP:NCORP, WP:LISTED and WP:GNG.
The article was well referenced, verifiable and complying the Wikipedia's Policy. It would be unfair to delete under Speedy delete. If you still believe that the article is not Notable, I would say Article for deletion process would be best way to reach any consensus.Thank you.-- Eramritasharma ( talk) 15:32, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the warning on his talk. Any chance you'd take a look at the report he just made at ANEW? Thanks. John from Idegon ( talk) 00:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
( edit conflict):Thanks again. Any possibility you'd try to explain BRD to him? If you read his emotional responses in his talk, you'll see clearly he's not grasping some very basic notions, such as OR. He's also apparently pretty blinded by COI as his talk page makes clear. There's been a history of "be true to my school" editing on this article, and at least one other school article regular, Meters, is aware of it. I'm just gonna piss this dude off further, so I'm not gonna do anything for at least a day. Hopefully Meters will pick it up later. Have a good morning or evening or whatever it is where you are. John from Idegon ( talk) 01:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I know you userfied this in trying to help me, but it's actually causing more harm. People are threatening to request speedy deletes on it, and I'm getting hammered on because the image that was on it when it was in the mainspace was non-free use uploaded. If you unuserfy it, I'd really appreciate it, as it was a viable article beforehand, and I've added to it since, so I'd much prefer it as it was, given that I was harrassed for it before. THis is only one of many times I've gotten this kind of treatment since joining Wikipedia, and I'm almost at the point of quitting. Please help. Thanks, Fhsig13 ( talk) 04:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
I think it is an interesting suggestion, though I am not too sure that the community would be open to it. Perhaps worth an RfC some day? -- TheSandDoctor Talk 01:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I've been noticing that as well, though I'm not sure it's as sudden as you seem to think — so far, this entire year has been an unprecedented barrage of pushback against WP:NPOL. A lot more candidates are trying to get Wikipedia articles than usual (I don't remember even 2016 being this bad!), and a lot more editors than ever are trying to drown the notion that campaign coverage in and of itself shouldn't be enough to get a person over WP:GNG. Try pointing out that every candidate always gets enough coverage to technically pass GNG if campaign coverage itself were automatically enough to pass GNG in and of itself, or try pointing out that Wikipedia's standard is the ten-year test for permanent significance and not the every single person who happens to get into the news today test, and people just stick their fingers in their ears and repeat that their candidate has enough campaign coverage to clear GNG — and try raising WP:BLP1E, and you get the response that an election is somehow not an event. Which, er, yes, it is.
It's tiresome, and I'm extremely fed up with it — if we don't hold "candidates do not get to use Wikipedia as a platform for their campaign brochures" as the bright red line that NPOL does not erase, then we may as well just fold up. Our value as a project depends on having standards for how a person becomes notable enough to get in here, and what their article has to look and sound like, and how it has to be referenced — without those, we're just Ballotpedia x LinkedIn, not a proper encyclopedia anymore. But what to do about it, I simply don't know. Bearcat ( talk) 05:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi can you please block IHateWalter666 and Fuckwalter? The former one is vandalising Walter Bustamante and the latter one is a sock I suppose. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk to me) 05:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
I never said nor hinted that editors should be penalized, that I my edits are not neutral, nor that I have an agenda (as does the "Sovereign citizen movement" page). The data I provided is backed by the stated sources - current law, .... I have said over and over that, as you said, "Sovereign citizens lacks balance or fails". Content disputes by majority vote do NOT change the information to a truth. Majority rules does not = reality. My political views are not the subject nor have I given any. The "other side" of the sovereign citizen is all I provided backed by actual current law (see below). Nothing "odd" here except the emotional and exaggerated responses to my evidence and comments.
Long List
|
---|
|
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgojoey ( talk • contribs) 21:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
On 2 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gudrun Burwitz, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
You closed the discussion with a no consensus, defaulted to keep. Can you take another look at the decision? The only keep vote is from the article's creator who has less than a hundred minor edits. His rationale for keep is pretty week as well. 2Joules ( talk) 05:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
I am puzzled by your decision and why, frankly, you are granted such authority. Your stated political beliefs lead me to believe you must, repeat MUST, no longer be involved in this process. Your bias is clear. Tim Bjorkman is a lawyer, a judge who served more than a decade on the South Dakota bench, an author, historian and legal scholar and the 2018 Democratic candidate for South Dakota's lone congressional seat. There have been dozens and dozens of media reports on his campaign. He is indeed a newsworthy person. In the page on the campaign, it appears all other candidates have pages. Why were they not deleted? I believe the answer is obvious. Yes, I work for Tim's campaign as communications director. I want to be upfront about that. But as a longtime Wikipedia user, it's clear to me Mr. Bjorkman merits a Wikipedia page -- and you should have no role in deciding if it should exist. Tom Lawrence sdwriter25@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 26SDWriter ( talk • contribs) 19:14, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
What permission/user rights are required to view logs of deleted pages? I want to check who created a couple of pages I AFD'ed, but even though I watchlisted them, I am unable to view the history. I hold only extended confirmed rights. Which user rights should I apply for in order to view creation logs?
Hello I am asking that the Jeffrey Sussman page be restored. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vintagemovieguy ( talk • contribs) 16:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Żegota. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ad Orientem! You decided to keep the article about Graham Kentsley referring to lack of consensus. I think, that there was a consensus because all the real users with a real contribution to Wikipedia concurred that the person isn't notable enough for the encyclopedia. The lack of consensus was made only by newly registered users, who are probably associated with Kentsley. Moreover, all their arguments are like "look, he was mentioned in some local tabloid", but I believe that this is not a sufficient reason. So, what do you think about it? Unfortunately, I'm not very familiar with the rules of English Wikipedia, so could you please explain me how can I appeal the keeping decision? -- XVodolazx ( talk) 11:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
There are several issues with your close of
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toontown. Firstly your close redirect to
Toontown (disambiguation)
should be a nonstarter as that put the pages in the
WP:MALPLACED work queue (which is how I found this close). Secondly, you should have realized that this close
made some 25 pages link to the disambiguation and taken it upon yourself to clean those up rather than leaving the task for some random editor to sort out. Of course, de facto deletion of the article on the topic (without actually deleting it) left nothing to disambiguate these links to, so I removed the links, and made sure that there was a nearby link to
Who Framed Roger Rabbit or a related article, so that the meaning of "Toontown" could still be ascertained by the reader. Thirdly, since this close effectively removed the article from
WP:primary topic status, it became necessary to move the article to a newly disambiguated title. While I was pondering over what title to move the article to, and sleeping on the matter, another editor
filed a technical request to move the malplaced dab page, and administrator
Anthony Appleyard move the redirected article page to
Toontown (version 2) – a title I'm not keen on, but understandable in this case. Fourthly, I question the need for a disambiguation page at all, as all of the items on the dab are Disney-related, excepting "Toontown", a nickname for
Saskatoon
which makes it a
WP:TWODABS situation that could be handled by a hatnote. Checking
Google Ngrams for the date the term originated, I see that it wasn't on the radar until 1985, although there was some obscure usage before then.
Looking at Google Books shows a handful of references that these mostly relate to
Roger Rabbit, as
Who Censored Roger Rabbit? was published in 1981. The
floodgates opened by the early 1990s, following the 1988 release of the film. I don't find the argument that the term fails
WP:GNG very convincing, given all these mentions by multiple independent publications. I think Disney made this a valid topic for a
WP:Broad-concept article – there is a somewhat amorphous relationship between the articles on the disambiguation page. The idea that the article should "Merge with Toontown (disambiguation)" is another nonstarter. We don't merge content into disambiguation pages. This is more an argument for merging the disambiguation into the broad-concept article and deleting Toontown (disambiguation). If this is indeed a valid broad-concept created by Disney, then that negates the need to remove those 25 links to the topic. –
wbm1058 (
talk) 15:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO. I have just been waiting since last year for this user to come back in some way, shape or form, and they're back using 208.28.133.202 (they previously used this IP in 2017 with the same snark). I can spot their attitude anywhere. Last year they edit warred over the mere order of singles on ÷ (album) and a slew of other then-recent pop music articles. Now they're back with their snark on recent pop music articles again. You can see (some) of their editing history at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PeopleEater143/Archive. It's like they can't edit without writing smart alec edit summaries, for example usually something along the lines of "that's not how it works" and acting like they have final say on everything. Looks like they've been around for a while now with their snark, but I only just spotted them at Palo Santo (Years & Years album). They also edit war like crazy. I'll report any further IP hops to you, because they came back using different usernames and IPs last year when users like myself and Jennica spotted a pattern (Jennica even said that she was sure they frequented a pop music forum she visited and were distinguishable by their attitude there). @ Hayman30: because they appeared to be editing Sweetener (album) quite a bit and you watch that article quite a bit. Can you be on the lookout there? Thanks! Ss 112 00:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ad. Recently, I merged List of England international footballers (alphabetical) to List of England international footballers and later redirected it to the latter per the result of an AFD. Another editor kept undoing the redirect, saying "the result is merge not redirect" but after completing the merge it is normal practice to redirect to the target article. It'll be great if you could take a look. The editor whose username is Z0 21:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, please restore John Humphrey (drummer) rather than redirect to The Nixons. His discography is with both bands. Also member of both bands. Here is one source showing Humphrey joining Seether in 2003.
https://www.mlive.com/entertainment/saginaw/index.ssf/2011/07/seether_on_the_right_track_as.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhdrumr ( talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
https://www.moderndrummer.com/article/july-2018-seethers-john-humphrey/
https://www.sabian.com/en/artist/john-humphrey
https://www.therockpit.net/2018/interview-john-humphrey-seether/
http://www.goldminemag.com/articles/kiss-collection-is-seether-drummers-pride-and-joy
https://www.axs.com/into-the-pit-interview-with-seether-drummer-john-humphrey-68927
https://amnplify.com.au/portfolio-items/interview-with-john-humphrey-of-seether/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhdrumr ( talk • contribs) 04:00, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
I happened to come across your express lane analogy here. Thanks for the laughs! Noticed their name had a strike-through at Chris Savino and got curious, then I see your funny message. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 16:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey AO, the Drake-loving block-evading editor from Thailand, Tanapot2001, is back using 27.55.99.17 Ss 112 19:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
108.31.98.232 ( talk · contribs) This editor keeps adding false information in the album ratings template in music-related articles [13] [14] [15]. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 06:14, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you take a look at the article TITANIIC? (Yes, that's the way it is spelled.) This is another Titanic replica project but by Czech entrepreneur Ondřej Vrkoč. It's flown under the radar here as it is an orphan article. Very hard to evaluate the reliability of the sources as they are mostly in Czech and the English language articles are Wiki mirrors. But from what I can tell it's all self promotion with help from an editor with an apparent COI. The project leader claims a collaboration with QM2 designer Stephen Payne and a business partnership with shipyard STX France. Maybe he spoke with them but an official role in his project is something on another level. As the main editor of Payne's article I don't see somebody with his credentials being associated with a ship that would have numerous SOLAS issues if built in the 1912 form. STX France's site comes up with zero results for a search of "Titaniic".
Given the lack of geographic scope, and difficulty of RS verification, at best this is a merger with Replica Titanic or a straight up AfD. I can merge it but I'd like to get another editor's opinion. Blue Riband► 02:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi AO, a week ago I reverted the user InUser on CeCe Peniston discography for their thinking things don't need to be sourced on Wikipedia, because they seem to be under the impression that some very relative things are "common knowledge". Just half an hour ago, they edited using the IP 89.24.184.201 to revert me twice: once on CeCe Peniston discography and InUser's talk page, both times using the summary I wrote when I reverted InUser's message on my talk page (which is a giveaway it was them). Now, not only that, but InUser seems to have edited several topics related to Jessica Lange. Not coincidentally, the IP address has edited Jessica Lange's awards and nominations page. This seems like a deliberate attempt to make disruptive, spiteful edits/reverts (copying my edit summary) while logged out. Ss 112 11:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey again AO. The editor Drizzy010 ( talk · contribs) mostly edited Drake discography and several Billboard achievement pages; Dalzon9596 is doing exactly the same thing. Same type of edits to Drake discography and editing the other pages Drizzy010 did. Ss 112 16:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, First of all beware I'm a newbie in wikipedia. I tried to get a new page in wikipedia for a non profit called "The Signals Network" that offers protection for whistleblowers. It appeared that the page was instantly marked for deletion : not enough notable sources -- from what I understood. I wanted to improve it but now that it has been removed is there a way I can get my text back in some way? (through some kind of revision history?). /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Signals_Network -- Mathieuleddet ( talk) 09:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, can you expand a little on your rationale for No Consensus? The first Keep !vote uses the term "reliable sources" which is not the criteria for establishing notability. The next doesn't use any policy based arguments. The next also uses "third-party reliable sources" which isn't the criteria. The last states they've added references and posted a requested move. Basically, none of the Keep !voters have provided any indication of the criteria in NCORP. Can you help me understand how you weighted the Yea and Nay !votes? Thank you. HighKing ++ 11:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
I understand that the numerical votes in the discussion (as it was) favored deletion, but I think it is important that as the closer of the AfD, that you add explanation for the close. Most of the delete votes (Nom, Tillerh11, John Paul Lambert) put in their comments before the expansion of the article (now I feel appropriate proclaiming WP:HEY). The argument raised in favor of deletion by SportingFlyer was rejected by Bearcat. And, it is not hard to characterize Mangoe's argument as "only things that happen in big cities are important." But, because AfD is not a vote, but a discussion of policy, I feel that as the closer, you should articulate which rational(s) you based the close upon, rather than a simple "delete."
As Bearcat alluded earlier on your talk page (which I also fully agree with), these AfDs do set precedent (to a degree, as certain arguments are stronger than others). In my concluding comments on the AfD, "there are lots of local mayors" who are similar to the final version of the (now) deleted page, who are mayors of cities with a substantial sized population, whose article is greater than stub length, and whose merits would presumably be debated around the "significant things he did in the position" - as Bearcat mentioned, which is not, traditionally, been a question of this project. -- Enos733 ( talk) 06:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey AO. Basically every day, an IP in the 83.xx.xxx.xxx range is coming back around to Girls Like You and adding a bunch of unreliable charts (listed at WP:BADCHARTS), unsourced or component charts we don't need. Can you maybe protect it for a bit? This 83-range IP is persistent with Maroon 5 articles; they did it previously at What Lovers Do as well. Ss 112 12:42, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! I was interested to see your close here, and wondered if you had seen the brief discussion at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#Sockpuppet nominations. I'm fully in agreement with you, but I'm not sure that those other editors would be. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, please help me understand why two of our communities have been deleted. Thank-you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rus2er ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)