Thanks for uploading Image:Groupstairs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Did you get that userbox from me? If so, that's fine: I stole it from another fraternity! In Hoc! Scoutersig 20:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Feel free to use the 'real' userbox: just put in {{
User Sigma Chi}} and go!
Scoutersig 15:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- See this per your message. - Scoutersig
Can you do what you did with the Notable Sig alumni and make it the same type of thing with the list of chapters? I don't think that belongs on the main page and I don't know how to do it.
If you want to add colony information to the List of Sigma Chi chapters, then you should check The Magazine: in the back should be a list of all chapters' contact info, and then colonies too. "Interest groups" won't be listed, but you could email HQ, I suppose. — Scouter Sig 15:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
If you email HQ, they can send you really high-resolution images of the badge, crest, flag, etc. Those would be really good to put up. — Scouter Sig 06:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Brother, I just added a "Theology" section to the notable Sigs page, seeing how good your Education section is. I found a website run by a Sig on faculty at Sam Houston, [1]; you might check it out for famous Sigs. IHSV! — Scouter Sig 16:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- When did the List of Sigma Chi chapters page go to a state-by-state system, and why? And how the heck did I miss that, haha?? — Scouter Sig 03:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Yla.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Valencia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Valencia.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to
the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 18:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
With regards to your comments on Image talk:Valencia.jpg: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Oden 03:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
OK, I've added ratings and ranking to the proposed template for Fraternities and Sororities, with the requirements to be found on the appropriate page. We're waiting on a transparent picture; is there anything else to be done to this template? I'd like to give it another week or so before making it an official template. Just leave some comments on the template talk page for the template. — Scouter Sig 02:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the template to a bunch of pages; and for creating and updating many more articles on Fraternities and Sororities. Keep up the good work Brother. — Scouter Sig 20:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Themileafter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The reasoning behind the "Top" Importance rating I gave to the Kappa Alpha Society page was given in the edit notes. All modern collegiate fraternities exist to either oppose or emulate the Society, therefore, being the forerunner and founder of the fraternal system with regards to higher education, it should be accorded the highest importance rating. This is not merely vicarious ego stroking, but instead is done for those interested in the history of college fraternities. A thorough knowledge of the history and practices of the Society will lead others to a better understanding of the Greek system as a whole. So regardless of what the WikiProject chart regarding fraternities has to say, I am changing the talk page project box to reflect the importance of the Society, for without KA there would be no Greek system as we know and understand it today. Matthew Cadrin 15:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Looking back at what you say above really makes me question your motives in this article. I'm guessing you are a brother of the Kappa Alpha Order and very proud, but you are making that too important in your editing. You are making claims that all Greek life exists because of it(if you say you arent look at the history at talk:Kappa Alpha Order. You say "All modern collegiate fraternities exist to either oppose or emulate the Society, therefore, being the forerunner and founder of the fraternal system with regards to higher education, it should be accorded the highest importance rating." I have never heard this in my life and I have yet to see a piece of literature claiming this either. Not only does this statement sound ignorant but it is complete ego stroking. And if "A thorough knowledge of the history and practices of the Society will lead others to a better understanding of the Greek system as a whole.", why is the history on the page so short and bland only going as far to say everything emulates it. I hope you can come back here to discuss this and tell me where this information comes from. Acidskater 17:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- First, you are confusing the Kappa Alpha Order with the Kappa Alpha Society, they are very distinct and wholly separate organizations. Secondly, the most well-known and widely circulated literature confirming my viewpoint would be Baird's Manual of Fraternities. If you would like, I could head over to the library, pick up a copy and cite where exactly I found this information. Additionally, there are a number of internet news articles restating this same information and I have heard anecdotal evidence of other fraternities' pledge manuals with this same history. I was under the impression, obviously mistakenly, that this was common knowledge. As for the article itself, it is short and bland, there is work in progress to improve it substantially. In the meantime, I will gladly compromise at a rating of "High" and will endeavour to improve the article while answering any questions and addressing any concerns you may have. I would ask though, that you do some footwork of your own and confirm for yourself what I have said, you will find the information readily available and in accord with what I have previously stated. Matthew Cadrin 18:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am very happy you responded and will look this up. I did confuse the names but whenever I referenced something I would go to the Kappa Alpha Society. I was doubtful because I have looked into Greek life quite a bit and had never heard of this claim. The closest I had ever heard was that the Union Triad was the beginning of social Fraternities. I also urge you to join the Wikiproject Fraternities and Sororities. Acidskater 02:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Carnage Middle School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Mr.Z-man
talk
¢ 20:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of I Surrender Records
An editor has nominated I Surrender Records, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Surrender Records and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dixon.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to say good job on adding a great piece to the Sigma Chi article. The organization of a fraternity is important, and you did a great job with the one for Sigma Chi. Jmlk17 07:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. I have put a lot into Sigma Chi thus far and hope to bring it to a GA status and eventually make it a Featured Article. Acidskater 07:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- What is a "Centurion" in your chapter? I've never heard of it. — Scouter Sig 21:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's actually some new thing HQ thought up. It is the new name for Risk Manager. If you go to the BLTW website you'll see they have it in the list on the left. Acidskater 01:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Rating of The Links, Incorporated
Can you or someone else in the project rate this article? I can't rate the article, since I have extensively edited/improved the article. Real96 20:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I got curious after seeing your ubx. My name's still Benstrider but I'm afraid I haven't registered many bills yet or had any hits. I looked for your profile on WG but couldn't find it. You must be registered under a different name? Benstrider 04:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Still no hits, but I'm adding more bills as I get them and I've finally resorted to writing on some of them, so I'm hopeful. Benstrider 03:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I was editing the page as you added those unecessary tags. I had done about an hours worth of work formating the chapter list, and I thought I lost it. I merely copied and pasted my work over the past edit w/o realizing you were adding tags.
Anywho, the information is not controversial, and the main reference was the LKS homepage. Alas, I will add the reference in and fill the page with 1's. [[TheAngriestPharmacist]] 17:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks buddy. He DID leave after six months, but he was initiated, and he is still listed in our national publications and such. Thanks for the kudos, but you do much more and better work on the project than I do! Jmlk17 22:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again. You researched and found that link for his biography and membership. While still somewhat uncertain of the source itself, I wanted to thank you for the time and research. Jmlk17 04:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Class/Importance Rating of Christian Fraternity
Left some comments on the discussion page, thought I'd suggest you take a look at them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keylay31 ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
|
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| For your tireless work and dedication on the Fraternity and Sorority Project. Keep up the great work! † Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 18:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading Image:SigmachiFlag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Please see my reply to your talk page post here. 67.100.185.234 22:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see my reply to your talk page post here. 67.100.185.234 05:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see my reply to your talk page post here. 67.100.185.234 06:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you added a wikify tag to Phi Tau. It's not clear what about the article fails to meet wikipedia standards. Can you please drop a note on the article's talk page to let us know what to fix? Thanks!-- Kharker 15:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the recognition. I didn't expect the article to go under peer review so soon but it's nice to know that others have noticed the work. Thanks! -- † Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey buddy. I hope you don't mind me asking a non-Wiki question, but I'm just finding myself curious. May I ask why you chose Sigma Chi as your fraternity? I'm asking you, since we seem to be on the same level regarding fraternities, and have no ill will against our respective organizations. There is/was Sigma Chi at my school (was, since I am an alumni now), but I only knew one or two guys, and it was not on a more than "hey man, want a beer?" level. I've been reading your expanding article, and am becoming curious about the fraternity. I hope you don't mind my asking, but you are obvious very knowledgeable about Sigma Chi as a whole. Jmlk17 18:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks for the answer(s). Sorry it took me this long to get back to you. Just an FYI, I nominated Sigma Chi for a Good Article status, as I believe the recent edits have really pushed it into a higher category than what it is currently listed under. Hope all's well, and happy editing bro! Jmlk 17 05:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Sigma Tau Omega
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Sigma Tau Omega, by
Metros (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Sigma Tau Omega seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Sigma Tau Omega, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --
Android Mouse Bot 2 04:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Despite the name Phi Beta Lambda, PBL is not a Greek organization. It is a branch of FBLA-PBL and exists as a student organization and not a frat/sorority. This is also true of Delta Epsilon Chi which is the college level of DECA (organization). Hope that clarifies things, Metros 12:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sigtauo crest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 00:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your addition of the "Types" section. The article is developing well, although some of my prose is a little sloppy; could you look through the article as it stands and see if I've missed any major topic points? CloudNine 21:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Acidskater, you've been putting a lot of (good/great/fantastic!) work into the Sigma Chi page, including many end references. However, they are getting somewhat bulky; perhaps some can be put into the text of the article and only the "most important" ones can be kept at the bottom. — Scouter Sig 02:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- From what I saw, there were 35 references at the bottom. Does that really seem like alot? Just curious... Jmlk 1 7 04:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Goinggreek.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Goinggreek.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rchs.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rchs.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Horizonslogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:SigmaChiBadge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I saw on my watchlist that you nominated Phi Delta Theta for GA status. I'm a brother there, so I have the pledge manual, which of course has our history, symbols, etc. in it. If you want, we could work together and could probably get the article to FA status. Also, University of Pittsburgh? I wrote University of Pittsburgh Honors College. I'm always surprised to find out how many people on Wikipedia are from Pitt. RyanGerbil10 (Don't ask 'bout Camden) 04:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would be happy to work with you on making the article better but the editor who would be best for the job would be Dysepsion. He is the main editor who has made the page what it is today. Acidskater 06:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I never claimed the footnotes were references; the last section is entitled "Notes and references". Plus I tend to add references at the end of the paragraph; most paragraphs cite one or two sources. CloudNine 08:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- If they source more than one reference then put it the sentence after the references. You can use WP:CITE as a guide for making references. Acidskater 02:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Ylalogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
- Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 02:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Ylalogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Valenciacover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
hey buddy =) i actually just graduated, so my bltw days have come to an end (i think) ... I might try to return as faculty some day. What year are you? Didn't realize we had a chapter at Pitt, nice. I got to go to grand chapter this year in san jose, that was a real trip. i'll be in palo alto next year hopefully helping out with the stanford chapter. good to hear from you, guard well man, Brian Firedancer414 12:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!
P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 22:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
WP:NPOV edit in Burger King article
You removed the comment that McDonald's was Burger King's largest rival. Why? McD's is the number one fast food burger chain to BK's #2. that was a factual statement you removed.
Jerem43 04:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- That statement did not have a source for it and did not follow WP:NPOV. If there is an official statement saying that they are the biggest competitor then it will follow WP:NPOV. Acidskater 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Did you look at the opening of each article? The statements are taken directly from that, and those are verified and cited. - Jerem43 23:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't hard to look at the history and see that you added the citations before posting on my page. Thus, my actions were justified and you took the proper steps to allow that statement to be put into the article. It's wikipedia guidelines working at their best. Acidskater 01:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Acidskater, there has been some (well, very little) discussion on the talk page for Fraternities and sororities about that article being biased to North America (I agree). I was thinking that to address some concerns, it needed to have a section right before "Greek umbrella organizations" on why people went Greek. It should talk about: grades, philanthropy, social networking, cultural growth (especially for NPHC), and leadership training, at least. But I can't seem to Google any information that is provided at a level larger than one campus, so any statistics I find are not useable. Where do you suggest I look? I'll look for your reponse on my talk page. — Scouter Sig 22:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you know anything about this article on Theta Phi Psi? It's from Raleigh, NC, supposedly. — Scouter Sig 21:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Bro, I was able to make this scratchpage of mine have some famous Sigs, according to the version of Baird's on Wikisource. Do you think I'll ever be able to prove any of them, let alone find out Lathrop's first name?? — Scouter Sig 05:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey. I'm not sure I understand the NPOV argument. Everything on the page is factual, and I tried to make sure nothing on there expressed an opinion. Do you have suggestions? — brewery —Preceding comment was added at 13:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you have associated yourself with WikiProject North Carolina in one way or another and I wanted to say Hi. I have been doing a bit of work on the project and wanted to know if you were still interested. One of the major things that we need help with is article assessment. If you go to NC Article Grading and Ranking you will see that as of 12-25-2007 we have over 2,900 articles that are either unassessed and/or have not been tagged with importance. If you are interested in remaining a part of WikiProject North Carolina, please consider placing the userbox {{ User WikiProject North Carolina}} if you have not already done so that others will know that you are a part of this Project as well as ensuring that you are listed on the WP North Carolina Participants. If you are no longer interested in participating in the project, please strike through your name on the WP North Carolina Participant list and/or remove the WikiProject NC Userbox! If you have any questions, please let me know! Rob110178 ( talk) 22:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your assistance in finding (and supporting) references for the notable members on the Sigma Alpha Mu page. I am new to Wikipedia, so your help was very much appreciated. Hail to Pitt! -- PittSammy ( talk) 02:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for calling out the issues with the Raven Society article. I've tried to do some cleanup -- in your assessment, are there other NPOV or citation issues with the article at this time? Tjarrett ( talk) 20:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi--could you take another look at Raven Society and see if we still have NPOV issues on the article? I don't want to remove the tag unless you're OK with it. Tjarrett ( talk) 19:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
.jpg) |
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
I don't know what your thoughts will be on this, but I'd like to hear what it is. — Scouter Sig 15:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
A Pitt related page, Oakland Zoo (cheering section), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are important. Please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakland Zoo (cheering section) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. CrazyPaco ( talk) 06:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
|
As a current or past contributor to a Pitt- related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Pittsburgh and the Pitt Panthers. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Addbot ( talk) 19:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading
Image:Phikapcoat.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
A newsletter has been planned for
WikiProject North Carolina, a WikiProject where you are a member. As a member, you will automatically receive the newsletter on this talk page unless you choose to opt-out. If you wish to opt-out of the newsletter, then please leave a message on the
project's talk page. If you would like to help write the newsletter, then please add your name at
Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Newsroom. Thank you.
Diligent Terrier Bot (
talk) 17:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
This message was delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot ( talk · contribs), a bot operated by Diligent Terrier ( talk · contribs).
WikiProject North Carolina May 2008 Newsletter
|
|
|
| NEWSLETTER | ||
| Issue One • May 2008 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
News  Hello WikiProject North Carolina members! A few of us at the The Newsroom Team decided to get together and re-energize the project, through these newsletters. This newsletter is hopefully the first of many to come. We want this project to be active in creating and expanding articles related to our state. If you're a current or former resident of the state, we hope that you will help spread the knowledge of how much there is to learn about North Carolina.
| ||
| Archives • Newsroom | ||
| Newsletter written by
The Newsroom Team. Newsletter delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot | ||
| If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please post at the WikiProject North Carolina talk page. | ||
The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier.
Any idea on how I can respond to this without breaking the Three Revert Rule? Yes, if he is a Significant Sig, surely he's "important," but if he doesn't have a wikipedia article, then he's not notable (rough rule, not strict). What should I do? — Over My Head 18:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
There is an ongoing debate regarding the introduction of the article for the University of Pittsburgh. In search of WP:Consensus, please let your opinion be known regarding the debate and possible solutions at Talk:University of Pittsburgh. Thank you and Hail to Pitt! CrazyPaco ( talk) 22:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.
Ikip ( talk) 20:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Wharf Theater reference
I noticed that you disputed the reference (the only reference) on the article as affiliation or unreliable. I agree, but don't know if it is worth the effort of removing as Project Theatre has begun accepting this reference through consensus. If you feel strongly could you explain more fully on my talk page. I am researching this refernces use on wiki as a reliable source. As a more experianced editor than I was when I wrote and referenced the article I am aware of the boosterism and promotional nature of the theatre alliance site, and while I support them in real life, I don't see it's use as appropriate. If it is no longer a problem, please let me know as I am about to expand the reference to properly format it, or delete it. (In other words accept it's use and fix the way it is cited on the page or if you still feel it is innappropriate I will delete it and ask you to weigh in on the other uses of the site as reference on similar pages. Thanks-- Amadscientist ( talk) 04:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me. I appreciate the opinion on the reference. That helps a lot. I am going suggest a merge with Monterey, California. The article has had no significant contributions since it began and my research shows that an effort of working with one of the museums in cooperation with a local historian was the only option to provide further references of quality. Google books has advanced a bit since so there is always a chance I may find something further, but It's about a sections worth of information and notable enough for the cities article.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 23:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Yla.jpg missing description details
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Hi! Since you're listed as a Wikipedian in Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 |
Hello, Acidskater! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
-- Kumioko ( talk) 21:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Since you are a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course ( WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Since you are one of the editors in the Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Pittsburgh, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course ( WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk) 02:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumi-Taskbot (
talk) 18:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
|
Great American Wiknic - Pittsburgh |
|
| You are invited to the second Great American Wiknic taking place in Schenley Plaza, in Pittsburgh, on Saturday, June 23, 2012 starting at noon! This is a chance for all of the wikipedians in the Greater Pittsburgh area to meet for an afternoon of fun and fellowship. This is a bring your own lunch event, if you have special treats you would like to share feel free to bring them. We would love to have you there! |
Message delivered by Guerillero | My Talk at 22:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Order Constantine.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. GrapedApe ( talk) 03:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Totally Lame, this is the reason why I left working on Wikipedia. Bunch of users just ruining it for the rest. Acidskater ( talk) 03:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
 |
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Pittsburgh Wikipedian's are invited to a meet up on April 3, 2015. Meetup Pittsburgh
- Bfpage | leave a message 01:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dutch Jews, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ajax, Dutch and 1976 US Open. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 20 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
The Brewery (music venue)
- added a link pointing to 2000s
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| For your contributions to List of Dutch Jews and many other fine contributions around Wikipedia! gidonb ( talk) 16:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! Acidskater ( talk) 04:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi ツ I am going to patrol (approve) your article on the The Pour House, but I have a question about the wording. I have not been there for several years and remember the upstairs, downstairs configuration. Has this layout changed? And it seems from their webpage they still serve beer and do not mention liquor (mixed drinks). The article needs updating if they are now glitzy and white-glove like Glenwood South establishments. If not just make the details present tense. Thanks and happy editing. Fylbecatulous talk 14:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is no longer setup like that but I've just gotten started on the article and have a lot more to add. Just building up the proper sources before adding certain information. I believe they serve liquor now but I'll have to double-check everything. Acidskater ( talk) 15:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, and forgive me for jumping ahead of your work. Wishing you the best. Fylbecatulous talk 16:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Fylbecatulous: I have added much more and honestly think it's ready to be considered of Start-status (maybe even C, but I might be getting ahead of myself). If you could take a look and let me know what you think it'd be much appreciated! Acidskater ( talk) 19:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, very good and interesting article. I smile at the human interest description of the band deciding to move the furniture to play closer to the bar. Still a good atmosphere, it sounds like. I awoke the Music Venues Task Force from inactive status and ran the WP 1.0 bot to update the table for quality and importance. (after I upgraded your article ツ ) Thanks again, Fylbecatulous talk 21:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- slakr\ talk / 22:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- slakr\ talk / 22:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Slakr: I saw that you have approved a 31 hour block on User:Bunco man and am curious about if I am violating WP:3RR or any other guidelines if I were to take out the disputed content, being that he and I were in a heated argument about the matter. I'm not sure if you were able to look into the dispute itself but if so I am curious as to your thoughts on the matter. Thank you. Acidskater ( talk) 22:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'd very strongly recommend letting someone else handle it unless it's a clear, obvious, and urgent exception to the three-revert rule. If it isn't, I'd say try to open a thread on the talk page instead. The more consensus you can demonstrate for or against a change to the page—even if the current version of the page is problematic—the more long-term power it has against someone engaging in disruptive editing. -- slakr\ talk / 22:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Will do. I have already started a new thread on the talk page and will leave it to someone else to take care of. Thank you! Acidskater ( talk) 22:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I noticed several instances where you restored warnings on user talk pages. Please note that when a user removes a warning, the actual guideline is that it's technically okay for them to do so, with specific exceptions (listed there). Basically, they're implicitly saying they've seen the warning, regardless of whether they intend to follow it. On the upside, most patrolling administrators will check the user-talk-page history rather than rely on only the apparent presence or absence of a warning when determining what kind of action to take, and someone removing a warning yet still engaging in the behavior tends to be the worst possible thing they can do. :P -- slakr\ talk / 22:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Ebonelm has continued his irrational removal of hyperlinks. I am currently tracking all his edits to see if he continues this line of behavior. Antamajnoon ( talk) 10:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Jaap Nunes Vaz, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Giant
Snowman 09:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you ever so much for truly helping improve the article! I now know that instead of adding citations, engaging in discussion, or just following WP:NOCITE that I should now delete unsourced articles and material right away. Start a discussion on the talk page or even just check it to see if a user is seeking help in adding citations to said article? FORGET THAT! I'm gonna go guns blazing and tell them not add or change ANYTHING without citing a source and then delete it all. I guess I should also ignore what is stated in the tag that WP:NOCITE recommends to put on articles without references...but I guess I'll let you look that up yourself. If only they had Barn Stars for the wonderful help you've provided the wikipedia community in this edit and warning to me! Acidskater ( talk) 02:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to clean up pages to meet the guideline of WP:USERNOCAT which basically says that pages in the user and user talk spaces should not be in the categories which contain mainspace pages. One of those categories which is for mainspace pages is Category:Chancellors of the University of Pittsburgh. Your User page is in that category because you display Template:University of Pittsburgh leaders. I'm hesitant to comment it out on your user page, but including that template doesn't appear to fit the Wikipedia guidelines on Category use. Naraht ( talk) 21:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Sigma Chi you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 18:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
Sigma Chi you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Sigma Chi for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 19:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
Sigma Chi you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Sigma Chi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 11:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest |
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
Hello Fellow North Carolina user,
I have reorganized and updated the content for the Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina. I hope it is useful to improving collaboration.
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Howdy. Around the 'pedia, the standard practice is to put the birth/death date before the birth/death places, in bios. GoodDay ( talk) 21:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- user:GoodDay, I reverted your edit because you changed the year from 1591 to 1951, so it seemed like possible vandalism, although good to see you kept the correct year on your revert. Also, if you're going to talk about standard practice around the 'pedia, telling people to "look around the 'pedia'" really does not ahere to WP:TPG. Instead, it is much better to cite the actual guidelines you are referencing, especially since it backs up what you say instead of forcing users to just take your word for it. In this case, seems you should have likely cited MOS:BIRTHDATE, although this MOS also seems to suggest the birth/death places shouldn't even be placed within the brackets. The MOS says "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and can appear in the lead if relevant to notability, but not in the opening brackets alongside the birth and death dates." Acidskater ( talk) 08:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Groupstairs.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Did you get that userbox from me? If so, that's fine: I stole it from another fraternity! In Hoc! Scoutersig 20:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Feel free to use the 'real' userbox: just put in {{
User Sigma Chi}} and go!
Scoutersig 15:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- See this per your message. - Scoutersig
Can you do what you did with the Notable Sig alumni and make it the same type of thing with the list of chapters? I don't think that belongs on the main page and I don't know how to do it.
If you want to add colony information to the List of Sigma Chi chapters, then you should check The Magazine: in the back should be a list of all chapters' contact info, and then colonies too. "Interest groups" won't be listed, but you could email HQ, I suppose. — Scouter Sig 15:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
If you email HQ, they can send you really high-resolution images of the badge, crest, flag, etc. Those would be really good to put up. — Scouter Sig 06:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Brother, I just added a "Theology" section to the notable Sigs page, seeing how good your Education section is. I found a website run by a Sig on faculty at Sam Houston, [1]; you might check it out for famous Sigs. IHSV! — Scouter Sig 16:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- When did the List of Sigma Chi chapters page go to a state-by-state system, and why? And how the heck did I miss that, haha?? — Scouter Sig 03:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Yla.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Valencia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Valencia.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to
the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 18:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
With regards to your comments on Image talk:Valencia.jpg: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Oden 03:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
OK, I've added ratings and ranking to the proposed template for Fraternities and Sororities, with the requirements to be found on the appropriate page. We're waiting on a transparent picture; is there anything else to be done to this template? I'd like to give it another week or so before making it an official template. Just leave some comments on the template talk page for the template. — Scouter Sig 02:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding the template to a bunch of pages; and for creating and updating many more articles on Fraternities and Sororities. Keep up the good work Brother. — Scouter Sig 20:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Themileafter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The reasoning behind the "Top" Importance rating I gave to the Kappa Alpha Society page was given in the edit notes. All modern collegiate fraternities exist to either oppose or emulate the Society, therefore, being the forerunner and founder of the fraternal system with regards to higher education, it should be accorded the highest importance rating. This is not merely vicarious ego stroking, but instead is done for those interested in the history of college fraternities. A thorough knowledge of the history and practices of the Society will lead others to a better understanding of the Greek system as a whole. So regardless of what the WikiProject chart regarding fraternities has to say, I am changing the talk page project box to reflect the importance of the Society, for without KA there would be no Greek system as we know and understand it today. Matthew Cadrin 15:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- Looking back at what you say above really makes me question your motives in this article. I'm guessing you are a brother of the Kappa Alpha Order and very proud, but you are making that too important in your editing. You are making claims that all Greek life exists because of it(if you say you arent look at the history at talk:Kappa Alpha Order. You say "All modern collegiate fraternities exist to either oppose or emulate the Society, therefore, being the forerunner and founder of the fraternal system with regards to higher education, it should be accorded the highest importance rating." I have never heard this in my life and I have yet to see a piece of literature claiming this either. Not only does this statement sound ignorant but it is complete ego stroking. And if "A thorough knowledge of the history and practices of the Society will lead others to a better understanding of the Greek system as a whole.", why is the history on the page so short and bland only going as far to say everything emulates it. I hope you can come back here to discuss this and tell me where this information comes from. Acidskater 17:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- First, you are confusing the Kappa Alpha Order with the Kappa Alpha Society, they are very distinct and wholly separate organizations. Secondly, the most well-known and widely circulated literature confirming my viewpoint would be Baird's Manual of Fraternities. If you would like, I could head over to the library, pick up a copy and cite where exactly I found this information. Additionally, there are a number of internet news articles restating this same information and I have heard anecdotal evidence of other fraternities' pledge manuals with this same history. I was under the impression, obviously mistakenly, that this was common knowledge. As for the article itself, it is short and bland, there is work in progress to improve it substantially. In the meantime, I will gladly compromise at a rating of "High" and will endeavour to improve the article while answering any questions and addressing any concerns you may have. I would ask though, that you do some footwork of your own and confirm for yourself what I have said, you will find the information readily available and in accord with what I have previously stated. Matthew Cadrin 18:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- I am very happy you responded and will look this up. I did confuse the names but whenever I referenced something I would go to the Kappa Alpha Society. I was doubtful because I have looked into Greek life quite a bit and had never heard of this claim. The closest I had ever heard was that the Union Triad was the beginning of social Fraternities. I also urge you to join the Wikiproject Fraternities and Sororities. Acidskater 02:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Carnage Middle School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Mr.Z-man
talk
¢ 20:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of I Surrender Records
An editor has nominated I Surrender Records, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Surrender Records and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dixon.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to say good job on adding a great piece to the Sigma Chi article. The organization of a fraternity is important, and you did a great job with the one for Sigma Chi. Jmlk17 07:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. I have put a lot into Sigma Chi thus far and hope to bring it to a GA status and eventually make it a Featured Article. Acidskater 07:57, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- What is a "Centurion" in your chapter? I've never heard of it. — Scouter Sig 21:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's actually some new thing HQ thought up. It is the new name for Risk Manager. If you go to the BLTW website you'll see they have it in the list on the left. Acidskater 01:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Rating of The Links, Incorporated
Can you or someone else in the project rate this article? I can't rate the article, since I have extensively edited/improved the article. Real96 20:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I got curious after seeing your ubx. My name's still Benstrider but I'm afraid I haven't registered many bills yet or had any hits. I looked for your profile on WG but couldn't find it. You must be registered under a different name? Benstrider 04:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Still no hits, but I'm adding more bills as I get them and I've finally resorted to writing on some of them, so I'm hopeful. Benstrider 03:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
I was editing the page as you added those unecessary tags. I had done about an hours worth of work formating the chapter list, and I thought I lost it. I merely copied and pasted my work over the past edit w/o realizing you were adding tags.
Anywho, the information is not controversial, and the main reference was the LKS homepage. Alas, I will add the reference in and fill the page with 1's. [[TheAngriestPharmacist]] 17:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks buddy. He DID leave after six months, but he was initiated, and he is still listed in our national publications and such. Thanks for the kudos, but you do much more and better work on the project than I do! Jmlk17 22:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again. You researched and found that link for his biography and membership. While still somewhat uncertain of the source itself, I wanted to thank you for the time and research. Jmlk17 04:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Class/Importance Rating of Christian Fraternity
Left some comments on the discussion page, thought I'd suggest you take a look at them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Keylay31 ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
|
|
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
| For your tireless work and dedication on the Fraternity and Sorority Project. Keep up the great work! † Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 18:32, 13 May 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading Image:SigmachiFlag.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Please see my reply to your talk page post here. 67.100.185.234 22:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see my reply to your talk page post here. 67.100.185.234 05:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please see my reply to your talk page post here. 67.100.185.234 06:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I see you added a wikify tag to Phi Tau. It's not clear what about the article fails to meet wikipedia standards. Can you please drop a note on the article's talk page to let us know what to fix? Thanks!-- Kharker 15:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the recognition. I didn't expect the article to go under peer review so soon but it's nice to know that others have noticed the work. Thanks! -- † Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey buddy. I hope you don't mind me asking a non-Wiki question, but I'm just finding myself curious. May I ask why you chose Sigma Chi as your fraternity? I'm asking you, since we seem to be on the same level regarding fraternities, and have no ill will against our respective organizations. There is/was Sigma Chi at my school (was, since I am an alumni now), but I only knew one or two guys, and it was not on a more than "hey man, want a beer?" level. I've been reading your expanding article, and am becoming curious about the fraternity. I hope you don't mind my asking, but you are obvious very knowledgeable about Sigma Chi as a whole. Jmlk17 18:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks for the answer(s). Sorry it took me this long to get back to you. Just an FYI, I nominated Sigma Chi for a Good Article status, as I believe the recent edits have really pushed it into a higher category than what it is currently listed under. Hope all's well, and happy editing bro! Jmlk 17 05:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Sigma Tau Omega
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Sigma Tau Omega, by
Metros (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Sigma Tau Omega seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Sigma Tau Omega, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --
Android Mouse Bot 2 04:58, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Despite the name Phi Beta Lambda, PBL is not a Greek organization. It is a branch of FBLA-PBL and exists as a student organization and not a frat/sorority. This is also true of Delta Epsilon Chi which is the college level of DECA (organization). Hope that clarifies things, Metros 12:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sigtauo crest.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 00:32, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your addition of the "Types" section. The article is developing well, although some of my prose is a little sloppy; could you look through the article as it stands and see if I've missed any major topic points? CloudNine 21:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Acidskater, you've been putting a lot of (good/great/fantastic!) work into the Sigma Chi page, including many end references. However, they are getting somewhat bulky; perhaps some can be put into the text of the article and only the "most important" ones can be kept at the bottom. — Scouter Sig 02:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- From what I saw, there were 35 references at the bottom. Does that really seem like alot? Just curious... Jmlk 1 7 04:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Goinggreek.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Goinggreek.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Rchs.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rchs.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Horizonslogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:SigmaChiBadge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I saw on my watchlist that you nominated Phi Delta Theta for GA status. I'm a brother there, so I have the pledge manual, which of course has our history, symbols, etc. in it. If you want, we could work together and could probably get the article to FA status. Also, University of Pittsburgh? I wrote University of Pittsburgh Honors College. I'm always surprised to find out how many people on Wikipedia are from Pitt. RyanGerbil10 (Don't ask 'bout Camden) 04:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I would be happy to work with you on making the article better but the editor who would be best for the job would be Dysepsion. He is the main editor who has made the page what it is today. Acidskater 06:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I never claimed the footnotes were references; the last section is entitled "Notes and references". Plus I tend to add references at the end of the paragraph; most paragraphs cite one or two sources. CloudNine 08:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- If they source more than one reference then put it the sentence after the references. You can use WP:CITE as a guide for making references. Acidskater 02:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Ylalogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 12:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
- Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 02:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Ylalogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
|
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Valenciacover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
hey buddy =) i actually just graduated, so my bltw days have come to an end (i think) ... I might try to return as faculty some day. What year are you? Didn't realize we had a chapter at Pitt, nice. I got to go to grand chapter this year in san jose, that was a real trip. i'll be in palo alto next year hopefully helping out with the stanford chapter. good to hear from you, guard well man, Brian Firedancer414 12:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!
P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 22:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
WP:NPOV edit in Burger King article
You removed the comment that McDonald's was Burger King's largest rival. Why? McD's is the number one fast food burger chain to BK's #2. that was a factual statement you removed.
Jerem43 04:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- That statement did not have a source for it and did not follow WP:NPOV. If there is an official statement saying that they are the biggest competitor then it will follow WP:NPOV. Acidskater 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Did you look at the opening of each article? The statements are taken directly from that, and those are verified and cited. - Jerem43 23:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't hard to look at the history and see that you added the citations before posting on my page. Thus, my actions were justified and you took the proper steps to allow that statement to be put into the article. It's wikipedia guidelines working at their best. Acidskater 01:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Acidskater, there has been some (well, very little) discussion on the talk page for Fraternities and sororities about that article being biased to North America (I agree). I was thinking that to address some concerns, it needed to have a section right before "Greek umbrella organizations" on why people went Greek. It should talk about: grades, philanthropy, social networking, cultural growth (especially for NPHC), and leadership training, at least. But I can't seem to Google any information that is provided at a level larger than one campus, so any statistics I find are not useable. Where do you suggest I look? I'll look for your reponse on my talk page. — Scouter Sig 22:03, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Do you know anything about this article on Theta Phi Psi? It's from Raleigh, NC, supposedly. — Scouter Sig 21:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Bro, I was able to make this scratchpage of mine have some famous Sigs, according to the version of Baird's on Wikisource. Do you think I'll ever be able to prove any of them, let alone find out Lathrop's first name?? — Scouter Sig 05:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey. I'm not sure I understand the NPOV argument. Everything on the page is factual, and I tried to make sure nothing on there expressed an opinion. Do you have suggestions? — brewery —Preceding comment was added at 13:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you have associated yourself with WikiProject North Carolina in one way or another and I wanted to say Hi. I have been doing a bit of work on the project and wanted to know if you were still interested. One of the major things that we need help with is article assessment. If you go to NC Article Grading and Ranking you will see that as of 12-25-2007 we have over 2,900 articles that are either unassessed and/or have not been tagged with importance. If you are interested in remaining a part of WikiProject North Carolina, please consider placing the userbox {{ User WikiProject North Carolina}} if you have not already done so that others will know that you are a part of this Project as well as ensuring that you are listed on the WP North Carolina Participants. If you are no longer interested in participating in the project, please strike through your name on the WP North Carolina Participant list and/or remove the WikiProject NC Userbox! If you have any questions, please let me know! Rob110178 ( talk) 22:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all of your assistance in finding (and supporting) references for the notable members on the Sigma Alpha Mu page. I am new to Wikipedia, so your help was very much appreciated. Hail to Pitt! -- PittSammy ( talk) 02:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for calling out the issues with the Raven Society article. I've tried to do some cleanup -- in your assessment, are there other NPOV or citation issues with the article at this time? Tjarrett ( talk) 20:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi--could you take another look at Raven Society and see if we still have NPOV issues on the article? I don't want to remove the tag unless you're OK with it. Tjarrett ( talk) 19:46, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
|
As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! |
I don't know what your thoughts will be on this, but I'd like to hear what it is. — Scouter Sig 15:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
A Pitt related page, Oakland Zoo (cheering section), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are important. Please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oakland Zoo (cheering section) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. CrazyPaco ( talk) 06:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
|
|
As a current or past contributor to a Pitt- related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Pittsburgh and the Pitt Panthers. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Addbot ( talk) 19:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC) |
Thanks for uploading
Image:Phikapcoat.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
A newsletter has been planned for
WikiProject North Carolina, a WikiProject where you are a member. As a member, you will automatically receive the newsletter on this talk page unless you choose to opt-out. If you wish to opt-out of the newsletter, then please leave a message on the
project's talk page. If you would like to help write the newsletter, then please add your name at
Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Newsroom. Thank you.
Diligent Terrier Bot (
talk) 17:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
This message was delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot ( talk · contribs), a bot operated by Diligent Terrier ( talk · contribs).
WikiProject North Carolina May 2008 Newsletter
|
|
|
|
| NEWSLETTER | ||
| Issue One • May 2008 • About the Newsletter | ||
|
News Hello WikiProject North Carolina members! A few of us at the The Newsroom Team decided to get together and re-energize the project, through these newsletters. This newsletter is hopefully the first of many to come. We want this project to be active in creating and expanding articles related to our state. If you're a current or former resident of the state, we hope that you will help spread the knowledge of how much there is to learn about North Carolina.
| ||
| Archives • Newsroom | ||
| Newsletter written by
The Newsroom Team. Newsletter delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot | ||
| If you would no longer like to receive this newsletter, please post at the WikiProject North Carolina talk page. | ||
The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier.
Any idea on how I can respond to this without breaking the Three Revert Rule? Yes, if he is a Significant Sig, surely he's "important," but if he doesn't have a wikipedia article, then he's not notable (rough rule, not strict). What should I do? — Over My Head 18:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
There is an ongoing debate regarding the introduction of the article for the University of Pittsburgh. In search of WP:Consensus, please let your opinion be known regarding the debate and possible solutions at Talk:University of Pittsburgh. Thank you and Hail to Pitt! CrazyPaco ( talk) 22:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.
Ikip ( talk) 20:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Wharf Theater reference
I noticed that you disputed the reference (the only reference) on the article as affiliation or unreliable. I agree, but don't know if it is worth the effort of removing as Project Theatre has begun accepting this reference through consensus. If you feel strongly could you explain more fully on my talk page. I am researching this refernces use on wiki as a reliable source. As a more experianced editor than I was when I wrote and referenced the article I am aware of the boosterism and promotional nature of the theatre alliance site, and while I support them in real life, I don't see it's use as appropriate. If it is no longer a problem, please let me know as I am about to expand the reference to properly format it, or delete it. (In other words accept it's use and fix the way it is cited on the page or if you still feel it is innappropriate I will delete it and ask you to weigh in on the other uses of the site as reference on similar pages. Thanks-- Amadscientist ( talk) 04:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back to me. I appreciate the opinion on the reference. That helps a lot. I am going suggest a merge with Monterey, California. The article has had no significant contributions since it began and my research shows that an effort of working with one of the museums in cooperation with a local historian was the only option to provide further references of quality. Google books has advanced a bit since so there is always a chance I may find something further, but It's about a sections worth of information and notable enough for the cities article.-- Amadscientist ( talk) 23:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Yla.jpg missing description details
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Hi! Since you're listed as a Wikipedian in Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:05, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Hello, Acidskater! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! |
-- Kumioko ( talk) 21:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Since you are a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Pittsburgh, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course ( WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Since you are one of the editors in the Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Pittsburgh, I'd like to invite you to the Teaching with Wikipedia Workshop that will take place at CMU on Aug 15 (this workshop is open to general public, and is a joint imitative of CMU and Pitt). There will be another workshop held at Pitt in the Fall as well. It will cover how to include Wikipedia in one's course ( WP:SUP) and also how to become a Wikipedia:Campus Ambassadors. Pennsylvania has currently only one ambassador (myself) and it would be great if we could recruit at least several more. Ambassadors help course instructors, showing them how Wikipedia works, and interact with students. Many current ambassadors come from the body of students, faculty and university staff; it is a fun adventure, and adds to one resume/CV, to boot :) If it sounds interesting, feel free to ask me any questions, or to come to the workshop.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:55, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumioko (
talk) 02:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
--
Kumi-Taskbot (
talk) 18:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Great American Wiknic - Pittsburgh |
|
| You are invited to the second Great American Wiknic taking place in Schenley Plaza, in Pittsburgh, on Saturday, June 23, 2012 starting at noon! This is a chance for all of the wikipedians in the Greater Pittsburgh area to meet for an afternoon of fun and fellowship. This is a bring your own lunch event, if you have special treats you would like to share feel free to bring them. We would love to have you there! |
Message delivered by Guerillero | My Talk at 22:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Order Constantine.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. GrapedApe ( talk) 03:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Totally Lame, this is the reason why I left working on Wikipedia. Bunch of users just ruining it for the rest. Acidskater ( talk) 03:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
| Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
|---|---|
|
Yours, Maximilianklein ( talk) 03:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
Pittsburgh Wikipedian's are invited to a meet up on April 3, 2015. Meetup Pittsburgh
- Bfpage | leave a message 01:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dutch Jews, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ajax, Dutch and 1976 US Open. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 20 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
-
The Brewery (music venue)
- added a link pointing to 2000s
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
|
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| For your contributions to List of Dutch Jews and many other fine contributions around Wikipedia! gidonb ( talk) 16:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much! Acidskater ( talk) 04:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi ツ I am going to patrol (approve) your article on the The Pour House, but I have a question about the wording. I have not been there for several years and remember the upstairs, downstairs configuration. Has this layout changed? And it seems from their webpage they still serve beer and do not mention liquor (mixed drinks). The article needs updating if they are now glitzy and white-glove like Glenwood South establishments. If not just make the details present tense. Thanks and happy editing. Fylbecatulous talk 14:22, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is no longer setup like that but I've just gotten started on the article and have a lot more to add. Just building up the proper sources before adding certain information. I believe they serve liquor now but I'll have to double-check everything. Acidskater ( talk) 15:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, and forgive me for jumping ahead of your work. Wishing you the best. Fylbecatulous talk 16:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Fylbecatulous: I have added much more and honestly think it's ready to be considered of Start-status (maybe even C, but I might be getting ahead of myself). If you could take a look and let me know what you think it'd be much appreciated! Acidskater ( talk) 19:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, very good and interesting article. I smile at the human interest description of the band deciding to move the furniture to play closer to the bar. Still a good atmosphere, it sounds like. I awoke the Music Venues Task Force from inactive status and ran the WP 1.0 bot to update the table for quality and importance. (after I upgraded your article ツ ) Thanks again, Fylbecatulous talk 21:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- slakr\ talk / 22:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.-- slakr\ talk / 22:12, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- @ Slakr: I saw that you have approved a 31 hour block on User:Bunco man and am curious about if I am violating WP:3RR or any other guidelines if I were to take out the disputed content, being that he and I were in a heated argument about the matter. I'm not sure if you were able to look into the dispute itself but if so I am curious as to your thoughts on the matter. Thank you. Acidskater ( talk) 22:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'd very strongly recommend letting someone else handle it unless it's a clear, obvious, and urgent exception to the three-revert rule. If it isn't, I'd say try to open a thread on the talk page instead. The more consensus you can demonstrate for or against a change to the page—even if the current version of the page is problematic—the more long-term power it has against someone engaging in disruptive editing. -- slakr\ talk / 22:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- Will do. I have already started a new thread on the talk page and will leave it to someone else to take care of. Thank you! Acidskater ( talk) 22:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
I noticed several instances where you restored warnings on user talk pages. Please note that when a user removes a warning, the actual guideline is that it's technically okay for them to do so, with specific exceptions (listed there). Basically, they're implicitly saying they've seen the warning, regardless of whether they intend to follow it. On the upside, most patrolling administrators will check the user-talk-page history rather than rely on only the apparent presence or absence of a warning when determining what kind of action to take, and someone removing a warning yet still engaging in the behavior tends to be the worst possible thing they can do. :P -- slakr\ talk / 22:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Ebonelm has continued his irrational removal of hyperlinks. I am currently tracking all his edits to see if he continues this line of behavior. Antamajnoon ( talk) 10:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
|
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Jaap Nunes Vaz, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Giant
Snowman 09:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you ever so much for truly helping improve the article! I now know that instead of adding citations, engaging in discussion, or just following WP:NOCITE that I should now delete unsourced articles and material right away. Start a discussion on the talk page or even just check it to see if a user is seeking help in adding citations to said article? FORGET THAT! I'm gonna go guns blazing and tell them not add or change ANYTHING without citing a source and then delete it all. I guess I should also ignore what is stated in the tag that WP:NOCITE recommends to put on articles without references...but I guess I'll let you look that up yourself. If only they had Barn Stars for the wonderful help you've provided the wikipedia community in this edit and warning to me! Acidskater ( talk) 02:15, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to clean up pages to meet the guideline of WP:USERNOCAT which basically says that pages in the user and user talk spaces should not be in the categories which contain mainspace pages. One of those categories which is for mainspace pages is Category:Chancellors of the University of Pittsburgh. Your User page is in that category because you display Template:University of Pittsburgh leaders. I'm hesitant to comment it out on your user page, but including that template doesn't appear to fit the Wikipedia guidelines on Category use. Naraht ( talk) 21:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Sigma Chi you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 18:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
Sigma Chi you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Sigma Chi for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 19:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The article
Sigma Chi you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Sigma Chi for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jaguar --
Jaguar (
talk) 11:41, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Acidskater. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
|
US Banknote Contest |
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
Hello Fellow North Carolina user,
I have reorganized and updated the content for the Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina. I hope it is useful to improving collaboration.
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Howdy. Around the 'pedia, the standard practice is to put the birth/death date before the birth/death places, in bios. GoodDay ( talk) 21:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- user:GoodDay, I reverted your edit because you changed the year from 1591 to 1951, so it seemed like possible vandalism, although good to see you kept the correct year on your revert. Also, if you're going to talk about standard practice around the 'pedia, telling people to "look around the 'pedia'" really does not ahere to WP:TPG. Instead, it is much better to cite the actual guidelines you are referencing, especially since it backs up what you say instead of forcing users to just take your word for it. In this case, seems you should have likely cited MOS:BIRTHDATE, although this MOS also seems to suggest the birth/death places shouldn't even be placed within the brackets. The MOS says "Birth and death places, if known, should be mentioned in the body of the article, and can appear in the lead if relevant to notability, but not in the opening brackets alongside the birth and death dates." Acidskater ( talk) 08:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)