This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ayurveda ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Basti

Virechana ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Purgation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ekabhishek. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you have an issue with the image, discuss on the talk page arrive at a consensus, before making a BOLD move like this. Thanks! Ekabhishek ^talk 11:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religious harmony in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious harmony in India (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tito☸ Dutta 16:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

As time permits please do consider to join me in updating content as discussed in this section.

Thanks and Regards

Mahitgar ( talk) 07:23, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quite long time back I came across the poetess Shanta Shelke in a book shop and asked for her signature.She politely asked me to buy any marathi language book,I bought a book and she signed on its first page.Your mention reminded me about her.

Thanks for your edit support.Also liked couplets माझा खेळ मांडू दे and "स्नेह का आव्हान फिर फिर . ." on my talk page.

Rgds

Mahitgar ( talk) 09:38, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Tito☸ Dutta 23:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the wikipedia link. I read the link, as it mentions as following - A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge.

What I felt after reading this is, the page referred to matter is directly a primary source where above conditions are met. What is your opinion ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Gmailer ( talk • contribs) 14:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

One shall discuss the topic at relevant page. And in this case the relevant page is the article talk page. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 16:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello Abhijeet Safai,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Samsung galaxy star for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lgcsmasamiya ( talk) 13:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Greetings Abhijeet Safai. Thanks for your note. It's precisely the paragraph you removed (and then restored) just after I added the "tone" tag that needs work on. That kind of language may be used if it as actual quotes, and punctuated as such, from secondary sources, i.e. notable film critics, etc., but an encyclopedic article cannot be written in that tone. Regards, -- Technopat ( talk) 12:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, request you add your views on Talk:Ganesh_Chaturthi#Ganesh_Chaturthi_.26_Ganesh_festival.... Thanks Coolgama ( talk) 05:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The article Abhijit Pawar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Passes BLPPROD, just notable enough to pass CSD, but insufficient notability asserted and Verified to remain.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 14:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhijit Pawar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijit Pawar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 19:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayurveda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aksha ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

I e-mailed it to you. -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Just for your info, I decided not to follow your instructions about leaving my answer to your question on your talk page because we generally keep both the questions and answers to the Help Desk questions in one place. That way if a new editor is reading the HD, then they can see the responses right there and they don't have to go hunting through people's talk pages. Dismas| ^(talk) 08:55, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raghu Ram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roadies ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

We need you!

Hi Abhijeet Safai! 8th March is International Women's Day and to celebrate, women in India are organizing edit-a-thons and meetups to create and expand articles of importance to women in Wikipedia in English and various Indian languages. The goal of the month-long event is to encourage more women to contribute to Wikipedia and increase representation of articles related to women in Wikipedia. The event aims at creating new articles, expanding the existing stubs and translating English articles to various Indic languages. Read more about the event on our project page: Women's History Month (India), 2014. Get involved by: Signing up for the event and writing articles about notable Indian women Conducting an edit-a-thon or a workshop for women Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Reading and writing for our global blog channel We look forward to your contributions. Thank you! -- Netha (talk) 19:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

-- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 06:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

The Women's History Month Award

Hi , Thank you for all of the effort you put into the Women's History Month (India), 2014! I'm presenting you with the Women's History Month Award for creating/expanding several biographies of women on English Wikipedia. Your contributions are always highly appreciated. Cheers, -- Netha (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia volunteers are always trying to learn more about how users interact with Wikipedia and its sister projects, so that we can make the projects better and more fun for people like you. Please fill up this opt-in form to indicate your willingness in participating in the survey. It takes less than 15 seconds! Thanks!-- Netha (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello. We met at Clinical trials on Ayurvedic drugs. Unfortunately I do not have much time to develop Wikipedia articles on ayurveda these days, but I am interested and try to follow what is happening. One promising project is at meta:Wiki_Project_Med/Projects/Ayurveda, where User:AbhiSuryawanshi is trying to get good copies of all the classical health texts uploaded in the original languages then translated into every other language.

In general I would like more health history and information from India to be available online and through Wikipedia, and more engagement from people from India. That person doing the ayurvedic project, Abhishek, lives in Pune. If you are ever around contact him and see if we can collaborate on something. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

If you think a merge is appropriate, then leave the article alone right now and I'll see about starting a merge discussion. Dougweller ( talk) 05:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok thanks. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 05:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Mabalu. Abhijeet Safai, thanks for creating Vijay Kumbhar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, thanks for creating this article. Please can you expand it a bit more to show how this person is notable?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mabalu ( talk) 03:37, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MrBill3. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ayurveda without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MrBill3 ( talk) 13:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

.

Dear Dr. Abhijeet Safai plz make page of Sachin lokapure article of made changes in /info/en/?search=Sachin_Lokapure article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.47.83 ( talk) 05:00, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shankar Abaji Bhise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shankar Abaji Bhise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Quinto Simmaco ( talk) 11:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I GOT 97 MARKS IN MHCET 2015 SO IHOPE ADMITED IN BAMS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.215.60.61 ( talk) 10:01, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

I would like to include certain details of Maharashtrian tradition काठीकवाडी (a mr:काठी पूजा) in english wikipedia article Pole worship, I am requesting your kind help in translating two paragraphs from Marathi language to english language at Talk:Pole worship#विरगावची काठीकवाडी as per your your convinience.

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar ( talk) 19:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Sir, I shall surely do it and shall let you know about it soon. Thanks and regards, - Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 08:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Freedom 251 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.theinternetbuzz.com/topic/Freedom-251. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Dear Abhijeet

I am sick of paid media and want to take Wikipedia and Wikinews to become the ultimate unbiased news sources of the future. Kindly see my proposal ( work in progress ) /info/en/?search=User:Shashaanktulsyan/DataDrivenNews

Even if the entire thing is not feasible in wikipedia in it's current form. But whatever wikipedia already is, is highly under utilized. Let us talk about it. Please share your feedback on this.

Thanks Shashank Shashank Tulsyan ( talk) 10:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

	Aspiring Knowledge
	My work with certain ET cultures could be useful to medical research. nudge squidfish 16:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

You seem to have created a number of biographies of Indian scientists and institutions. This is all to the good. but please take a look at WP:CRED, WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTPROMO. The articles of yours that I took a look at all had issues with these guidelines. Academic credentials are inappropriate; long lists of publications are virtually always inappropriate, the only exceptions being authors so popular that all of their work has received substantial critical attention. I would suggest that you go through your creations and fix these issues. Finally, please remember that biographies of living people should have a reliable source for everything in them. It isn't enough to provide a source about a book they once wrote, and then to fill the article out with unsourced information. Vanamonde ( talk) 06:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you. I shall do that. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 06:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi abhijeet The article on Dr Himmatrao Bawaskar, I guess u had edited. Can we add his picture and a little more on his research work? May I? Thank you INSPIRATIONAL BIOGRAPHY Year : 2012 | Volume : 1 | Issue : 1 | Page : 52-55 A crusade against scorpion sting: Life and works of Dr. Himmatrao Bawaskar Naepin ( talk) 12:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there,

I came across this article (and its unfortunate demise) by chance. I do think the article did not necessarily qualify for speedy deletion, as there was an indication of significance or importance. I suggest you plead your case with the deleting administrator RickinBaltimore ( talk · contribs), I am sure he will be happy to restore the article upon polite request. Regards, decltype ( talk) 10:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

hellow Abhijeet Safai
Your request in the talk page in tewiki, His name is "Bangalore Srinivasarao Madhavarao" alias "B.S.Madhava Rao". He is an indian physisicist. see the link. thank you sir.-- Kvr.lohith ( talk) 05:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the information. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 05:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fattechand Jain Vidyalaya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. jd22292 ( Jalen D. Folf) ( talk) 05:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

When I am trying to edit Marathi Wikipedia and it is throwing following message and I am not able to save my edit. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 09:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

"No for non Marathi languages and/or roman script !!![Language policy & exceptions] Warning: An automated filter has detected your edit because it appears to contain few or no Marathi letters. You are currently editing the Marathi language Wikipedia; contributions in any other language will be deleted.[Language policy & exceptions]. To contribute in a language other than English, please select that language from http://www.wikipedia.org If your edit is constructive and suitable for the Marathi version of Wikipedia, please click 'Save page' again, and report this error."

I am sharing it here because I have got to know that no other Wikipedia prevents writing in English in this way. I would request experienced editors and administrators to kindly do as appropriate. Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 09:30, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

It has millions of articles spread across an enormous number of pages. For this reason it's very important to keep information in the right place, so that things don't become disorganized. With this in mind, could you please only use article pages for discussions related to improvements of that particular article. For general questions use the wikipedia teahouse. For discussions with editors you can use their talk pages, or you can

{{ping|user}}

on your own talk page and they'll receive a message like this:@ Abhijeet Safai:. Thanks for your understanding and happy editing. Edaham ( talk) 07:09, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I will do the same. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 07:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Counterfactual outcome. Since you had some involvement with the Counterfactual outcome redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. DGG ( talk ) 01:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Demographic surveillance system is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demographic surveillance system until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winged Blades of Godric ^{On leave} 04:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Nirman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ArthaKranti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArthaKranti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vijaya Lawate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vijaya Lawate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivek Velankar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Velankar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Society for Education Action and Research in Community Health is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Education Action and Research in Community Health until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Vivek Agnihotri. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann ( ^{Talk to me}/ _{What I been doing}) 19:48, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 05:31, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

After reviewing your request for the "eventcoordinator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The event coordinator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The event coordinator right allows you to temporarily add the " confirmed" permission to newly created accounts. You should not grant this for more than 10 days.
• The event coordinator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the event coordinator right will result in its removal by an administrator.
• Please note, if you were previously a member of the "account creator" group, your flag may have been converted to this new group.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the event coordinator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 20:18, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. But I am not aware how to give permission to create multiple accounts from the same IP address. Do I need to write something at the talk page of that IP address? Kindly guide. Thank you very much. -- Abhijeet Safai ( talk) 06:15, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Narendra Modi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush ( talk) 15:46, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

- Sitush ( talk) 15:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

• I had tagged it as overcited, notability and removed excessive links to youtube videos(which were of self published/bad sources)
• You not just removed those tags but posted a message with threats and Personal attacks. So I am forced to report you
• As you did not read the edit summaries nor the policies regarding links to youtube and what are good sources. QueerEcofeminist ( talk) 12:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Abhijeet Safai-- advocacy & COI. Please response over this subsection, if you wish so. Thank you. ∯WBG ^converse 15:29, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jagannath Dixit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagannath Dixit (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwige9 ( talk) 15:15, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

-- DBig Xrayᗙ 16:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Abhijeet Safai. I am hereby informing you that you have been topic banned from making edits to articles that pertain to Vivek Agnihotri, broadly construed. This is a Biographies of living persons Arbitration enforcement, so it is mandatory. If you disagree strongly with this decision, please feel free to file an appeal here. Thank you in advance for your close attention. El_C 17:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a violation of your TBan. ∯WBG ^converse 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

-- DBig Xrayᗙ 16:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Abhijeet Safai. I am hereby informing you that you have been topic banned from making edits to articles that pertain to Vivek Agnihotri, broadly construed. This is a Biographies of living persons Arbitration enforcement, so it is mandatory. If you disagree strongly with this decision, please feel free to file an appeal here. Thank you in advance for your close attention. El_C 17:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a violation of your TBan. ∯WBG ^converse 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

-- DBig Xrayᗙ 16:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Abhijeet Safai. I am hereby informing you that you have been topic banned from making edits to articles that pertain to Vivek Agnihotri, broadly construed. This is a Biographies of living persons Arbitration enforcement, so it is mandatory. If you disagree strongly with this decision, please feel free to file an appeal here. Thank you in advance for your close attention. El_C 17:25, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a violation of your TBan. ∯WBG ^converse 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jagannath Dixit shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – wallyfromdilbert ( talk) 05:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello again, Abhijeet Safai. I am hereby informing you that you have been topic banned from making edits to articles that pertain to Jagannath Dixit, broadly construed. This is a Biographies of living persons Arbitration enforcement, so it is mandatory. If you disagree strongly with this decision, please feel free to file an appeal here. Thank you in advance for your close attention. El_C 11:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clinical trials on Ayurvedic drugs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clinical trials on Ayurvedic drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps ( talk) 16:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Vera Sharav requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thenamesdictionary.com/name-meanings/156699/name-meaning-of-sharav. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Modussiccandi ( talk) 11:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Kichu🐘 ^Discuss 17:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Zack Ruhl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wozal ( talk) 07:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)