Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, 67-40-203-145.tukw.qwest.net ( 67.40.203.145), is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to CenturyLink Communications, Tukwila, WA 98168, United States. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Wikipedia in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Hello, I'm FenrisAureus. I noticed that in this edit to Bad Taste, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — FenrisAureus ▼ (she/they) ( talk) 17:41, 1 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Frighteners, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ASUKITE 18:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Videodrome, you may be blocked from editing. TLJ7863 ( talk) 23:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Crash (1996 film). TLJ7863 ( talk) 23:30, 2 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Alexf ^(talk) 01:56, 4 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in A Rainy Day in New York, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}| lambast 02:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Showgirls, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – AssumeGoodWraith ( talk | contribs) 06:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Starship Troopers (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Darkwarriorblake / Vote for something that matters 08:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Spielberg (surname), you may be blocked from editing. Miner Editor ( talk) 18:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Elle (film). ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Ray Harryhausen. Further reading is standard. Bibliography is discouraged because it is not clear whether it is limited to the works of the subject of the article. Peaceray ( talk) 23:41, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at The Golden Voyage of Sinbad. Peaceray ( talk) 23:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Thelma & Louise. Peaceray ( talk) 23:51, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Black Rain (1989 American film). as per MOS:FURTHER & MOS:BIB Peaceray ( talk) 23:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at The Departed. as per MOS:FURTHER & MOS:BIB Peaceray ( talk) 23:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at The Aviator (2004 film). as per MOS:FURTHER & MOS:BIB Peaceray ( talk) 23:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Changes to reference sections

Hi IP. I've had to revert many of your changes to reference section, where you have removed required cites and templates. Please be more careful with you changes, and if you don't understand why something is included in an article it might be best to leave it alone. I note you've repeated some of those reverted changes without comment, please note that communication is required for editting Wikipedia. If you have any questions please just ask. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 11:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You are again removing cites that are required by referencing, and failing to communicate. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆ transmissions∆ ° co-ords° 12:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Billion Dollar Brain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. TL | The Legend ^talk 03:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Henenlotter, you may be blocked from editing. DuncanHill ( talk) 11:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Boy Friend (1971 film). You removed a source without any reason or explanation given, thus breaking references. This is highly disruptive and must stop. DuncanHill ( talk) 11:24, 22 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Novem Linguae ( talk) 09:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.