Hello, Yaditiva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sanskrit drama. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Capitals00 ( talk) 16:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Nyāya Sūtras have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jessicapierce (
talk)
22:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 11:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Indian astronomy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
19:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Puranas. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
utcursch |
talk
15:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Theatre of India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Indian classical drama, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Theatre of India. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Vedic period. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.I notice that you're changing dates regarding Indian history in an uproper way. Please stop. @
Doug Weller:, could you take a look here? Thanks.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
07:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Rather, just block right away; clearly
WP:NOTHERE.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
07:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to
Ashoka seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
JimRenge (
talk)
10:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kanada (philosopher). -
Arjayay (
talk)
07:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Bhāsa, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
21:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Brahmi script. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 21:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Longhair\
talk
13:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Vedanga Jyotisha. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Indian logic, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Longhair\
talk
06:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)@ Longhair and Doug Weller: he's doing it again (changing dates); can you block them for a longer time? Thanks. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@ Longhair: that was quick! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@
Joshua Jonathan: I've just enforced a block for 72 hours just moments ago. Once they return, should they continue, we'll deal with a longer block then if need be. I'm fully aware of what's going on with their editing and became aware once I saw warnings begin to hit their talk page. Thanks for helping to cleanup. All the best. --
Longhair\
talk
06:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brahmi script, you may be blocked from editing. It is not a good idea to remove sourced content and disrupt text-source integrity (also on Kanada (Philosopher)). You have already received many warnings, please stop it. Thank you JimRenge ( talk) 19:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Urubhanga. -
Arjayay (
talk)
13:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaditiva. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Yaditiva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sanskrit drama. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Capitals00 ( talk) 16:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Nyāya Sūtras have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Jessicapierce (
talk)
22:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ms Sarah Welch ( talk) 11:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Indian astronomy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Kautilya3 (
talk)
19:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Puranas. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
utcursch |
talk
15:39, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Theatre of India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Indian classical drama, you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Theatre of India. -
Arjayay (
talk)
12:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Vedic period. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:16, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.I notice that you're changing dates regarding Indian history in an uproper way. Please stop. @
Doug Weller:, could you take a look here? Thanks.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
07:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Rather, just block right away; clearly
WP:NOTHERE.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
07:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to
Ashoka seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
JimRenge (
talk)
10:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Kanada (philosopher). -
Arjayay (
talk)
07:42, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Bhāsa, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk!
21:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Brahmi script. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 21:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Longhair\
talk
13:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Vedanga Jyotisha. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Indian logic, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Longhair\
talk
06:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)@ Longhair and Doug Weller: he's doing it again (changing dates); can you block them for a longer time? Thanks. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@ Longhair: that was quick! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@
Joshua Jonathan: I've just enforced a block for 72 hours just moments ago. Once they return, should they continue, we'll deal with a longer block then if need be. I'm fully aware of what's going on with their editing and became aware once I saw warnings begin to hit their talk page. Thanks for helping to cleanup. All the best. --
Longhair\
talk
06:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brahmi script, you may be blocked from editing. It is not a good idea to remove sourced content and disrupt text-source integrity (also on Kanada (Philosopher)). You have already received many warnings, please stop it. Thank you JimRenge ( talk) 19:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Urubhanga. -
Arjayay (
talk)
13:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yaditiva. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans
may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC) |