Hi Wikaviani, and thanks for your edits at the kebab article. Sorry that the source wasn't very clear in indicating the derivation of the Persian word as being a loanword from Arabic. Anyway the source and mention of the Persian word and etymology has now been removed from the article, which I don't really agree with, since there's a whole paragraph on the Turkish etymology still there (see the talk page). On the other hand, it would be good to have a more recent source. I'm not trying to prove one way or another what the origin of the Persian word is, I just think it could be mentioned in the article, whatever it is. It's difficult to find information in English about it though, and some of it is conflicting. I wonder if you have access to any high-quality reference books, maybe in Farsi, that might give a reliable indication of the origin of the word? Or do you think it's not necessary to mention? Thanks... -- IamNotU ( talk) 15:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hundred Years' War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-French War ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Swarm ♠ 05:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
RE this - I agree Jews and Persians actually have a lot in common, and co-existed for millenia (with some episodes of strife - e.g. Mashad - but... you can find strife in any pair over a long period). I won't repeat the cliche of "I have many X friends" - but I have been acquainted and friendly with a number of non-Jewish Iranians (as well as Jews of Iranian origin) over the years - all be it for the most part exiles. The current political strife probably will end at some point - perhaps sooner than we all expect (hardly anyone expected the Iron curtain to fall when it did) - it is also anomalous in terms of basic geopolitical interests - present ideological underpinnings aside, Iran/Israel is actually a "natural" alliance/friendship situation (non-neighbors, both adjacent to a large bloc of Arab Sunni states) - which was the case to varying degrees until 79. Ideology (of any sort) usually doesn't account for much in geopolitics, but in this case it actually does. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
You made the comment recently:
Rv, the name of Ansari is not even in the "source".
This is true, but the name Prodea Systems is. If you read a few lines up in the same Career section, you will see Ms. Ansari is CEO and co-founder of Prodea Systems.
Please tell if the source was not readable somehow, and you could not find it. but the Defendant Prodea Systems Inc is clearly stated on both court documents that were referenced.
Click "view image" and allow pop-ups:
http://countyclerkrecords.co.collin.tx.us/webinquiry/DocDescMain.aspx?sk=20171020001403460
http://countyclerkrecords.co.collin.tx.us/webinquiry/DocDescMain.aspx?sk=20171213001646780
How is it not relevant to the "Career" section of Ms Ansari that these events occurred? Is it wiki practice to only publish positive events? If so it's not very useful.
Alisarosen999 ( talk) 23:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)AR
Are you sure it is meant to say that Ali distributed both wealth and "booty", it sounds like long forgotten vandalism in the article! Surely that cant be right? Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 22:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Regarding
this edit summary -
Afsharid dynasty has |continent=Eurasia
in the infobox, which
used to automatically populate "Category:Former monarchies of Europe" and "Category:Former monarchies of Asia" before two infoboxes were merged. I was just adding the page to what I thought was the appropriate category, but it looks like a
GIGO situation. Incidentally this is the second time I've been reverted (over about 6 edits), so I'm starting to think that the people originally adding the values to |continent=
might not have been paying too much attention to what they were doing. No need to reply (but ping me if you do), just thought I'd explain what seemed like an odd edit.
Primefac (
talk)
14:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Plz,put on the Safavid page spanning of area extent,this page show true extent:(5 great islamic empires) Sasan Hero ( talk) 21:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
I mean this page has shown true Safavid dynasty greatest extent,this following page:(5 great islamic empires) Sasan Hero ( talk) 23:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
[2] - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I’m trying to keep an open mind, and putting in time to dig into more sources. I truly appreciate the work you and other editors are putting into this as well. But the actions of one particular editor are very tiresome, and makes it very hard to have an honest discussion about sources. Work permit ( talk) 21:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your tireless efforts in restoring civility to List of largest empires. Work permit ( talk) 05:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, as you know I’m a knew member of eanglish version of the Free Encyclopedia. So, I’ve some stuck with resources, can you show me exactly how will it better to form it in my situation, I mean David Lang’s book “The Georgians” (I have it in Russian way, but it doesn’t work here). By the way, I’ve worked in Russian version of Wikipedia for 8 months, nobody listened me and all my changes were reverted but after a very long battle with its’ administration, I realized, that it’s senseless, just a platform for falsification, that’s why I’ve decided to join this team, I hope you will really understand my position help me in different occasions. Bachilava2002 ( talk) 22:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
You've reverted some of this editor's edits. I think they're going to need more watching, given this sneaky removal of any mention of the Armenian Genocide. Pinkbeast ( talk) 06:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "List of largest empires". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 September 2018.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
17:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I understand your reasoning for your use of all capital letters, but all-caps is usually considered yelling. I know I would if I came across it, just observing it without knowing the circumstances of a situation. I'd gently suggest you refrain from an all-caps sentence(maybe just a word or two, if absolutely necessary). Just FYI. 331dot ( talk) 17:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
You might be interested in this ANI case as you (apart from Doug Weller) were also involved with said user. - LouisAragon ( talk) 23:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
What do you think about them? I reverted the first diff partially [5] because they changed the whole meaning of those sentences. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 12:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani. You reverted my edit which removed flags in front of commander/leader names in Battle of Lützen (1632). I gave the reason "... only one faction, not needed.", to which you replied "not a legit reason to remove all the others".
My whole reasoning is that I find too many flag icons in an infobox confusing rather than elucidating. I agree that they make sense to connect leaders to their factions when there is more than one faction. Are there rules for this or is it a matter of taste in the end? 2.247.243.115 ( talk) 19:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Djalal Akhbari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. That means articles in newspapers, journals etc. that are NOT directly connected to him (as the Center for Zoroastrian Studies appears to be).
I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
16:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning List of largest empires, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
19:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
I am restoring my changes. If you read my comment you would have seen it was the work of my brother that started the stupid conversation s so I am deleting them. -- Robandrew ( talk) 22:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for your help and the kind words you directed to me, as well as your offer to help me in my first steps on Wikipedia. I would also like to apologise if I started off in the wrong foot. I am ready to make amends. For now, I will take a small break of a few days. See you very soon regards.-- Ppteles ( talk) 16:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Can you please propose the merge or atleast help me with that? I want to merge assyria to assyrian homeland but dont know how to do that. I am new in wikipedia.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.214.48.173 ( talk) 11:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey man, sorry for the revert. I looked at the article again, and say that it says 'Empires at their greatest extent' right underneath the headline, which is why it doesn't matter if it says 'largest'. I also failed to see in the beginning that it list the empires by size as well, which supports the 'largest' in the headline. I feel dumb now, probably should have looked and read more carefully, again I'm sorry. SteamingStars ( talk) 20:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Plz,put on the correct spanning extent of tahirid dynasty ,correct is 2400,000km2 in the year of 850...and plz,put on the list saffarid dynasty,Safavid dynasty,Afsharid dynasty,thanks. Sasan Hero ( talk) 01:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I would do it but there have been a fair number of subsequent edits, all of which would have to be deleted as well. Besides, it's most likely that Oshwah is aware of it and could do it himself if he wished to.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani, I wanted to let you know I reverted two edits by an IP sock of blocked/banned long-term-abusive editor Shingling334 in the Azerbaijan article, who replaced the map and its caption, removing mention of Artsakh. As that effectively reverted some of your editing, I wanted to explain. I also reverted one previous unexplained/unsourced edit that seemed to have some erroneous naming in the caption. So the map and caption are now back at the previous consensus version, which has been the status quo for the past few months. I hope you won't mind, since it looks like you've also reverted to that same status quo version a number of times, eg. here and here, etc. I don't have an opinion about the map, I'm just interested in preventing Shingling334 from having any of his edits accepted, in the hopes he'll someday give up. In any case, if you really do want to change it to the map and caption without Artsakh, I'd like to ask you bring it up on the talk page first, before reinstating Shingling334's edits. Thanks! -- IamNotU ( talk) 01:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
The article René Lizárraga has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Due to the fact that you are undoing everything l do!, can you please mention the nineveh plains somewhere on the assyrian people article? I cant believe you are not mention it anywere, it is important and that is where creating of autonomy has been concentrated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, yeah, l am sorry, l really want to discuss with you in the talk page of the assyrian people about changing the name of the language from neo aramaic to assyrian aramaic, check it out. I have also applied good reasons for that. Nemrud91 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.214.48.173 ( talk) 20:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
yeah sure, but can we discuss this in the assyrian people talk page? Nemrud91
If you agree with me that we should change the name of the language then you do it. You are more respected than me and you probably know more about assyrians than me. Nemrud91
Yes, i understand that, yeah sure, do it:) Nemrud91 —Preceding undated comment added 21:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Maybe you should redirect it to syriac language? Syriac are turoyo, assyrian neo aramaic and chaldean, also, assyrians speak not only assyrian neo aramaic but also, turoyo and chaldean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Should you change where it says "neo aramaic" also? you can find it if you look down near population numbers in the beginning of the article or is it just that? Nemrud91 ( talk —Preceding undated comment added 06:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the email. zchrykng ( talk) 21:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The source that you posed for verification of Iranian citizenship for Pierre Omidyar is silent on citizenship, & only serves to establish ethnicity. I thus reverted your unsubstantiated edit. Perhaps you can find something that actually makes a statement about his citizenship. Peaceray ( talk) 19:30, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
From now on if I want rollback or whatever vs. vandalism, I will ask for it myself. I appreciate your faith in me, but when you nominated me it appears like I have asked you to do so. As such, I really do not care if I have Rollback or not.
Oh and "while I have your ear", you might take a look at Siege of Singara (344), which is in need of some modern historiography, modern reliable sources, neutral POV, neutral tone, etc, much like Perso-Roman wars of 337–361 before that rewrite. Any help would be most appreciated. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 05:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Brother he is from chauhan rajput dynasty.... Nd 4 days ago i hv seen tht there is clearly mentioned rajput word... So why u removed it?? Plz add tht Pratap.rathod67 ( talk) 12:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi wikiaviani, I made a request to undelete the neo assyrian empire map maybe a month ago but it still hasnt got back to the assyrian people article and neo assyrian empire article, l got their permission to use it and l have sent it to the permission link but it still hasnt been reverted, can you help me with that please? //Nemrud91 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 03:03, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
This map: https://www.google.se/search?q=neo+assyrian+empire&client=ms-android-samsung-gs-rev1&prmd=isvn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjC78vCn9_eAhUDtIsKHTO8BVwQ_AUoAXoECA0QAQ&biw=412&bih=718#imgrc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 00:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Why you did undo my edit on the Munshi page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahanshah5 ( talk • contribs) 12:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wikaviani!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Legacypac (
talk)
05:56, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Do you think they switched to anonymous editing? [6] [7] [8] It's odd because since the day I removed non-RS materials from the article and we rejected them on talk page, this IP-range has appeared and started edit warring. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 06:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't know why this nonsense remained there for a long time?! Awful. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 05:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wikaviani. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I noticed Khestwol changed "Dari" into "Persian" on 15 September 2018 (calling his edit "minor" [9]). "Dari" was the way it was spelled in the article for a long period of time. On 4 November 2018, an IP restored "Dari", but you reverted him. [10] I think we should just keep it at "Dari" (the WP:COMMONNAME, WP:RS, and WP:VER) or perhaps "Dari-Persian" to accomodate some of those disruptive IPs/users that hop in every now and then. Thoughts? - LouisAragon ( talk) 12:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
I was waiting for your respond but you did not come back to my Talk page , as i seen you have leak of knowledge over this kind of issue and you always think negatively , "iam not doing anything sneaky in Wikipedia!", this is the way how you explain when you Reverted edits? the Wikipedia administrators should see my changes as i did to Turkey and also look your Reverted. thank you Khoshhat ( talk) 21:35, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani, do you know how to make maps? DA1 ( talk) 11:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Your thoughts on [11], [12], [13], [14]? Better to look at his recent edits. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 14:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Consider myself warned? Please. You might like to discuss the Arabian issue on the Qanat talk page, but don't go reverting and threatening people like that, it's not playing nicely at all. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
You deleted in the article: "List of countries where Arabic is an official language" two passages. Do you think there are any mistakes? Please could you explain me why did you delete these two passages.
I would be happy if you reply.
Best regards,
Tom -- Tom112233 ( talk) 11:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
It's possible that he's right. The text he removed was a glittering generality. I'm checking the references. In any case, I think it was in good faith. Uninvited Company 23:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
I looked at the references for the glittering generalities he removed and removed some but not all. As I noted in my edit summary, the quality of the references was poor for that portion. I believe the IP is editing in good faith, and would encourage you to remove the warnings from their talk page. Best regards, Uninvited Company 23:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani, and thanks for your edits at the kebab article. Sorry that the source wasn't very clear in indicating the derivation of the Persian word as being a loanword from Arabic. Anyway the source and mention of the Persian word and etymology has now been removed from the article, which I don't really agree with, since there's a whole paragraph on the Turkish etymology still there (see the talk page). On the other hand, it would be good to have a more recent source. I'm not trying to prove one way or another what the origin of the Persian word is, I just think it could be mentioned in the article, whatever it is. It's difficult to find information in English about it though, and some of it is conflicting. I wonder if you have access to any high-quality reference books, maybe in Farsi, that might give a reliable indication of the origin of the word? Or do you think it's not necessary to mention? Thanks... -- IamNotU ( talk) 15:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hundred Years' War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-French War ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Swarm ♠ 05:32, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
RE this - I agree Jews and Persians actually have a lot in common, and co-existed for millenia (with some episodes of strife - e.g. Mashad - but... you can find strife in any pair over a long period). I won't repeat the cliche of "I have many X friends" - but I have been acquainted and friendly with a number of non-Jewish Iranians (as well as Jews of Iranian origin) over the years - all be it for the most part exiles. The current political strife probably will end at some point - perhaps sooner than we all expect (hardly anyone expected the Iron curtain to fall when it did) - it is also anomalous in terms of basic geopolitical interests - present ideological underpinnings aside, Iran/Israel is actually a "natural" alliance/friendship situation (non-neighbors, both adjacent to a large bloc of Arab Sunni states) - which was the case to varying degrees until 79. Ideology (of any sort) usually doesn't account for much in geopolitics, but in this case it actually does. Icewhiz ( talk) 13:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
You made the comment recently:
Rv, the name of Ansari is not even in the "source".
This is true, but the name Prodea Systems is. If you read a few lines up in the same Career section, you will see Ms. Ansari is CEO and co-founder of Prodea Systems.
Please tell if the source was not readable somehow, and you could not find it. but the Defendant Prodea Systems Inc is clearly stated on both court documents that were referenced.
Click "view image" and allow pop-ups:
http://countyclerkrecords.co.collin.tx.us/webinquiry/DocDescMain.aspx?sk=20171020001403460
http://countyclerkrecords.co.collin.tx.us/webinquiry/DocDescMain.aspx?sk=20171213001646780
How is it not relevant to the "Career" section of Ms Ansari that these events occurred? Is it wiki practice to only publish positive events? If so it's not very useful.
Alisarosen999 ( talk) 23:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)AR
Are you sure it is meant to say that Ali distributed both wealth and "booty", it sounds like long forgotten vandalism in the article! Surely that cant be right? Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 22:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Regarding
this edit summary -
Afsharid dynasty has |continent=Eurasia
in the infobox, which
used to automatically populate "Category:Former monarchies of Europe" and "Category:Former monarchies of Asia" before two infoboxes were merged. I was just adding the page to what I thought was the appropriate category, but it looks like a
GIGO situation. Incidentally this is the second time I've been reverted (over about 6 edits), so I'm starting to think that the people originally adding the values to |continent=
might not have been paying too much attention to what they were doing. No need to reply (but ping me if you do), just thought I'd explain what seemed like an odd edit.
Primefac (
talk)
14:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Plz,put on the Safavid page spanning of area extent,this page show true extent:(5 great islamic empires) Sasan Hero ( talk) 21:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
I mean this page has shown true Safavid dynasty greatest extent,this following page:(5 great islamic empires) Sasan Hero ( talk) 23:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
[2] - LouisAragon ( talk) 22:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I’m trying to keep an open mind, and putting in time to dig into more sources. I truly appreciate the work you and other editors are putting into this as well. But the actions of one particular editor are very tiresome, and makes it very hard to have an honest discussion about sources. Work permit ( talk) 21:13, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your tireless efforts in restoring civility to List of largest empires. Work permit ( talk) 05:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC) |
Hi, as you know I’m a knew member of eanglish version of the Free Encyclopedia. So, I’ve some stuck with resources, can you show me exactly how will it better to form it in my situation, I mean David Lang’s book “The Georgians” (I have it in Russian way, but it doesn’t work here). By the way, I’ve worked in Russian version of Wikipedia for 8 months, nobody listened me and all my changes were reverted but after a very long battle with its’ administration, I realized, that it’s senseless, just a platform for falsification, that’s why I’ve decided to join this team, I hope you will really understand my position help me in different occasions. Bachilava2002 ( talk) 22:05, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
You've reverted some of this editor's edits. I think they're going to need more watching, given this sneaky removal of any mention of the Armenian Genocide. Pinkbeast ( talk) 06:32, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "List of largest empires". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 September 2018.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
17:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
I understand your reasoning for your use of all capital letters, but all-caps is usually considered yelling. I know I would if I came across it, just observing it without knowing the circumstances of a situation. I'd gently suggest you refrain from an all-caps sentence(maybe just a word or two, if absolutely necessary). Just FYI. 331dot ( talk) 17:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
You might be interested in this ANI case as you (apart from Doug Weller) were also involved with said user. - LouisAragon ( talk) 23:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
What do you think about them? I reverted the first diff partially [5] because they changed the whole meaning of those sentences. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 12:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani. You reverted my edit which removed flags in front of commander/leader names in Battle of Lützen (1632). I gave the reason "... only one faction, not needed.", to which you replied "not a legit reason to remove all the others".
My whole reasoning is that I find too many flag icons in an infobox confusing rather than elucidating. I agree that they make sense to connect leaders to their factions when there is more than one faction. Are there rules for this or is it a matter of taste in the end? 2.247.243.115 ( talk) 19:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Djalal Akhbari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. That means articles in newspapers, journals etc. that are NOT directly connected to him (as the Center for Zoroastrian Studies appears to be).
I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Elmidae (
talk ·
contribs)
16:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation concerning List of largest empires, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
For the Mediation Committee,
TransporterMan (
TALK)
19:56, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
I am restoring my changes. If you read my comment you would have seen it was the work of my brother that started the stupid conversation s so I am deleting them. -- Robandrew ( talk) 22:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for your help and the kind words you directed to me, as well as your offer to help me in my first steps on Wikipedia. I would also like to apologise if I started off in the wrong foot. I am ready to make amends. For now, I will take a small break of a few days. See you very soon regards.-- Ppteles ( talk) 16:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Can you please propose the merge or atleast help me with that? I want to merge assyria to assyrian homeland but dont know how to do that. I am new in wikipedia.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.214.48.173 ( talk) 11:24, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Hey man, sorry for the revert. I looked at the article again, and say that it says 'Empires at their greatest extent' right underneath the headline, which is why it doesn't matter if it says 'largest'. I also failed to see in the beginning that it list the empires by size as well, which supports the 'largest' in the headline. I feel dumb now, probably should have looked and read more carefully, again I'm sorry. SteamingStars ( talk) 20:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Plz,put on the correct spanning extent of tahirid dynasty ,correct is 2400,000km2 in the year of 850...and plz,put on the list saffarid dynasty,Safavid dynasty,Afsharid dynasty,thanks. Sasan Hero ( talk) 01:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I would do it but there have been a fair number of subsequent edits, all of which would have to be deleted as well. Besides, it's most likely that Oshwah is aware of it and could do it himself if he wished to.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:48, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani, I wanted to let you know I reverted two edits by an IP sock of blocked/banned long-term-abusive editor Shingling334 in the Azerbaijan article, who replaced the map and its caption, removing mention of Artsakh. As that effectively reverted some of your editing, I wanted to explain. I also reverted one previous unexplained/unsourced edit that seemed to have some erroneous naming in the caption. So the map and caption are now back at the previous consensus version, which has been the status quo for the past few months. I hope you won't mind, since it looks like you've also reverted to that same status quo version a number of times, eg. here and here, etc. I don't have an opinion about the map, I'm just interested in preventing Shingling334 from having any of his edits accepted, in the hopes he'll someday give up. In any case, if you really do want to change it to the map and caption without Artsakh, I'd like to ask you bring it up on the talk page first, before reinstating Shingling334's edits. Thanks! -- IamNotU ( talk) 01:41, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
The article René Lizárraga has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Due to the fact that you are undoing everything l do!, can you please mention the nineveh plains somewhere on the assyrian people article? I cant believe you are not mention it anywere, it is important and that is where creating of autonomy has been concentrated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, yeah, l am sorry, l really want to discuss with you in the talk page of the assyrian people about changing the name of the language from neo aramaic to assyrian aramaic, check it out. I have also applied good reasons for that. Nemrud91 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.214.48.173 ( talk) 20:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
yeah sure, but can we discuss this in the assyrian people talk page? Nemrud91
If you agree with me that we should change the name of the language then you do it. You are more respected than me and you probably know more about assyrians than me. Nemrud91
Yes, i understand that, yeah sure, do it:) Nemrud91 —Preceding undated comment added 21:19, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Maybe you should redirect it to syriac language? Syriac are turoyo, assyrian neo aramaic and chaldean, also, assyrians speak not only assyrian neo aramaic but also, turoyo and chaldean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 20:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Should you change where it says "neo aramaic" also? you can find it if you look down near population numbers in the beginning of the article or is it just that? Nemrud91 ( talk —Preceding undated comment added 06:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the email. zchrykng ( talk) 21:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The source that you posed for verification of Iranian citizenship for Pierre Omidyar is silent on citizenship, & only serves to establish ethnicity. I thus reverted your unsubstantiated edit. Perhaps you can find something that actually makes a statement about his citizenship. Peaceray ( talk) 19:30, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
From now on if I want rollback or whatever vs. vandalism, I will ask for it myself. I appreciate your faith in me, but when you nominated me it appears like I have asked you to do so. As such, I really do not care if I have Rollback or not.
Oh and "while I have your ear", you might take a look at Siege of Singara (344), which is in need of some modern historiography, modern reliable sources, neutral POV, neutral tone, etc, much like Perso-Roman wars of 337–361 before that rewrite. Any help would be most appreciated. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 05:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Brother he is from chauhan rajput dynasty.... Nd 4 days ago i hv seen tht there is clearly mentioned rajput word... So why u removed it?? Plz add tht Pratap.rathod67 ( talk) 12:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi wikiaviani, I made a request to undelete the neo assyrian empire map maybe a month ago but it still hasnt got back to the assyrian people article and neo assyrian empire article, l got their permission to use it and l have sent it to the permission link but it still hasnt been reverted, can you help me with that please? //Nemrud91 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 03:03, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
This map: https://www.google.se/search?q=neo+assyrian+empire&client=ms-android-samsung-gs-rev1&prmd=isvn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjC78vCn9_eAhUDtIsKHTO8BVwQ_AUoAXoECA0QAQ&biw=412&bih=718#imgrc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemrud91 ( talk • contribs) 00:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Why you did undo my edit on the Munshi page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahanshah5 ( talk • contribs) 12:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wikaviani!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Legacypac (
talk)
05:56, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
|
Do you think they switched to anonymous editing? [6] [7] [8] It's odd because since the day I removed non-RS materials from the article and we rejected them on talk page, this IP-range has appeared and started edit warring. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 06:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't know why this nonsense remained there for a long time?! Awful. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 05:56, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wikaviani. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I noticed Khestwol changed "Dari" into "Persian" on 15 September 2018 (calling his edit "minor" [9]). "Dari" was the way it was spelled in the article for a long period of time. On 4 November 2018, an IP restored "Dari", but you reverted him. [10] I think we should just keep it at "Dari" (the WP:COMMONNAME, WP:RS, and WP:VER) or perhaps "Dari-Persian" to accomodate some of those disruptive IPs/users that hop in every now and then. Thoughts? - LouisAragon ( talk) 12:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
I was waiting for your respond but you did not come back to my Talk page , as i seen you have leak of knowledge over this kind of issue and you always think negatively , "iam not doing anything sneaky in Wikipedia!", this is the way how you explain when you Reverted edits? the Wikipedia administrators should see my changes as i did to Turkey and also look your Reverted. thank you Khoshhat ( talk) 21:35, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Wikaviani, do you know how to make maps? DA1 ( talk) 11:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Your thoughts on [11], [12], [13], [14]? Better to look at his recent edits. -- Wario-Man ( talk) 14:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Consider myself warned? Please. You might like to discuss the Arabian issue on the Qanat talk page, but don't go reverting and threatening people like that, it's not playing nicely at all. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello Wikaviani,
You deleted in the article: "List of countries where Arabic is an official language" two passages. Do you think there are any mistakes? Please could you explain me why did you delete these two passages.
I would be happy if you reply.
Best regards,
Tom -- Tom112233 ( talk) 11:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
It's possible that he's right. The text he removed was a glittering generality. I'm checking the references. In any case, I think it was in good faith. Uninvited Company 23:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
I looked at the references for the glittering generalities he removed and removed some but not all. As I noted in my edit summary, the quality of the references was poor for that portion. I believe the IP is editing in good faith, and would encourage you to remove the warnings from their talk page. Best regards, Uninvited Company 23:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)