![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kremenchuk may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lowercase sigmabot III. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Dear colleague, please refrain from incorrect personal accusations you just made. I'm not a "spokesman/woman for the Russian government" and I don't think, that it's appropriate to label someone at all. BTW, I'm not opposed to inclusion that SCB of Crimea has been took over. Probably this variant will work? Seryo93 ( talk) 11:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
And moreover, WP:SYNTH: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources". Neither of these sources about takeover (references 4 and 5) explicitly called it a coup. Therefore, while it's pretty good to mention that SCB was captured by armed men, labeling it as a "coup" basing on these sources would violate SYNTH rule. And let me apologize for misunderstanding we had in regard to that deletion [of SCB takeover]. Bests, Seryo93 ( talk) 11:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't mind the spelling therefore you can simply change the American style (to which I am accustomed) to British. I've only tried to standarize the whole article which now uses both the American and British dialect. 85.202.42.2 ( talk) 10:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 02:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
pliz for the template *NATO designation for Russian and former Soviet Union missiles* + Surface-to-air missiles complete list
{{Navbox with collapsible groups
| name = Russian and Soviet missiles|SSM | title = NATO designation for Russian and former Soviet Union missiles | selected = | state = expanded | bodyclass = hlist
| group1 =
You can add this card to to the list of systems on this article (9K333 Verba (Willow) MANPADS)?
Surface-to-air missiles complete list + Ground based
SA-24 Grinch/Morfey +
9K333_Verba
I have created a draft article, Title taken from the article SA-24 Grinch. And she's standing in line to verify (I'm not asking you to check the article 9K333). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:9K333_Verba 89.105.158.243 ( talk) 17:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Unite Against Fascism may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Please do not revert my talk page again or I will have to report you for vandalism. WP:OWNTALK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.125.162 ( talk) 16:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks sorry I am not wikipedia savvy or wikipedia smart I guess some would call it. I appreciate you helping me out I always have the 4 ~ at the end of my message but it doesnt always show up. Have a good day! Keanderson5385 ( talk) 00:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Battle_of_Uhud&diff=629201371&oldid=629176034
Regarding this edit. You will see i have removed references that he used on talk page as it was effecting the talk page. I think turning a talk page into an article is also a breach of policy-- Misconceptions2 ( talk) 18:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for creating the great graphics on casualty rates by ship, in order of sailing, for the French & Spanish fleet vs. for the British fleet, used in the Battle of Trafalgar article, prominent at main page yesterday. Really great data-intensive graphics work, in spirit of great graphical design!
But see my small questions/requests at Talk:Battle of Trafalgar#great graphics but scaling needed, about possibly rescaling the graphics to be directly comparable to one another. And also about apparent discrepancies between percentages shown in graphic vs. appearing in supporting Order of battle at the Battle of Trafalgar article (which is stated to be source for graphic but doesn't match up exactly). Hope my comments are regarded as helpful in the spirit intended by me. Either way, thanks again for your prominent and great contributions! cheers, -- do ncr am 15:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Пока мелочи. Но, по всем признакам, это только начало. - Неполканов ( talk) 20:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Nope. 217.15.154.89 and 219.77.53.143 are not the same person. 219.77.53.143 ( talk) 09:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Thanks for your thoughtful input to the move discussion. Its semantics but I was wondering whether you could change your comment to something like:
Support a move but not to Salafism. This would at least keep the topic of a move on line.
Your input has really helped clarify things for me. I have been seeing label descriptions about the place and haven't been able to figure distinction from other terms. I was surprised to find that it was a neologism. What do you think of a merge to jihadism?
GregKaye ✍♪ 04:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
This edit was not a POV edit. It even has it on Ukrainian media-- Arbutus the tree ( talk) 03:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Respectable and Peer-Reviewed Article-Sources have been added to the edited articles in question (i.e. Italian Fascism). The neutral tone and encyclopaedic standard must be preserved at all time. It must be ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view. The above mentioned is usually encountered when opinions are stated as facts or poor sources are used. W must strive balanced set of information about the subject and not create a coatrack that goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias: An appropriate response to a coatrack article is to be bold and trim off excessive biased content ( WP:CHERRY)! See also WP:WEIGHT , WP:YESPOV and WP:NOR. I am sorry if this was not a case of WP:VAN, but do please join in the discussion on the talk page of the relevant WP article. Cheers, No Source - No Valid Source ( talk) 12:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 16:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Hasan ibn Ali may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Hannelore Kohl may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for the note. It shows me I need to revisit that article. I have learned since crafting that article that the ADC troops were issued a mixture of M-1 Garands and M1 Carbines. While it was thought the carbine would be better fitted to the short-statured recruits, many of them wanted the Garand for its extra range and power.
As to pallet loading—I am pretty much quoting the source. Just speculating (ORIGINAL RESEARCH WARNING!), I should think one would like weapons and ammo lashed together on the same pallet in case you needed them immediately after landing. For instance, to deal with your enemy, who is trying to chase down those same parachuted weapons.
I will have to mull my mind a bit to recall just where I saw that additional info, so it may be a bit before I revise the article.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 04:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Toddy1,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Iryna Harpy (
talk) 22:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
A Russian IP editor got blocked for edit-warring to impose his/her personal analyses on an article, so he responds "I am a... reservist psychological warfare officer! No doubt he was only obeying orders, lol.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Turkic people is not the only article where O.Turani has been adding unsourced claims that historical figures are of specific ethnicity. They have done the same repeatedly at Uzbeks [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. They eventually mention a source [7] but the source directly contradicts O.Turani's claim, say the Timurids were "rivals and opponents of the Uzbeks". [8] In spite of this, O.Turani continues to add claims that the Timurids were Uzbeks. [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] Edward321 ( talk) 01:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
And the first sock appears. [17] Already reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/O.Turani Edward321 ( talk) 17:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
No problem. EkoGraf ( talk) 13:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
He is famous dead link now . Recently his page was removed from owned by him domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов ( talk • contribs) 19:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Husayn ibn Ali. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: 1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made. 2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Ialiabbas ( talk) 15:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about the link to the discussion. I definitely do not mind. Edward321 ( talk) 01:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Please join in the discussion /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#.22Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation.22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Виктор Ш. ( talk • contribs) 22:25, 3 March 2015
As you've started an RM where I had an RFC, would you please clearly state your position on the naming issue? As it stands, it isn't clear where you stand, despite the fact that it is your RM. RGloucester — ☎ 02:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, but my edit was but an informative addition, which is relevant given the de-facto status. In fact the whole sentence, was copied word for word from the Donetsk article entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.188.125.25 ( talk) 09:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I am creating a new article. please help me. — Preceding Abdullah Al Wasif comment added 13:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Why did you deleted all the demographic data from the page(Salafi movement). Wahhabism is a synonyms of Salafism (The term is mostly used for the Saudi form of salafism).
Even those who distinguished Wahhabism from salafism called it a type of salafism.Even they did not say that wahhabism is not salafism.They meant that the Wahhabism, that was the old conservative movement in Saudi Arabia, was different from modern Salafism, influenced by the 19th Century Islamic modernists' movement, Qutbism etc.
Ejaz92 (
talk) 06:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for correcting my English spelling. But You are wrong in who first occupied this city, today's Lviv. In brief - at 1.September 1939 Nazi Germany began to invade Poland. Two days later the UK and France declared war on Nazi Germany. But on 17.September also the Soviet Union invaded the eastern parts of Poland as agreed in the previously secret part of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and at 23.September 1939 Poland surrendered. The USSR assult "in Poland's back" became a very "cheap" conquest for the USSR, as a large majority of the remaining Polish resistance was involved in fighting the nazists in the west. Lwow was a part of "the USSR prey" in eastern Poland - between (around) 17.September 1939 and some day or so after 22.June 1941, when Hitler launched his war against the Soviet Union. But the fact Hitler later fooled Stalin, doesn't change the history of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, in which Germany got most of Poland (as of 1939 borders) and Soviet Union got the most eastern parts of Poland together with the three Baltic nations and Finland. Finland managed though amazingly resist the USSR attack in November 1939. If You simply ment Germany attacked Poland before the Soviet Union also did so, then You are of cource right. Cheers Boeing720 ( talk) 22:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
The above description is too vague. It should not be included unless you also include the reasons for such claims. Its also not NPOV because it tries to influence the reader without any arguments. Nasluds ( talk) 22:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
79.109.203.252 (
talk) 15:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
79.109.203.252 (
talk) 09:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 06:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I have no problem with being quoted in the the [ SPI case]. However, looking at the case you have raised, you seem to have quoted me out of context. My comment was in connection with a sockpuppetry issue which became [ this] SPI case. I believe that I B Wright's comment was for the same sockpuppetry issue as he made reference to the same 4RR revert.
I therefore have to point out that you seem to have raised an SPI case against Kaz without any evidence. However, I have taken the liberty of linking the two cases.
I have also requested semi protection of Crimean Karaites. DieSwartzPunkt ( talk) 13:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Per wp:burden -- when an article has been tagged as needing refs for two years, and the text has been challenged and deleted - only restore it if you provide inline RS refs. Thank you. -- Epeefleche ( talk) 07:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Were you aware of this "guideline"? Apparently it was written by only two editors and they are claiming it represents a consensus. -- Taivo ( talk) 03:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
re John Hindmarsh. Please revert your edit deleting his service on the Victory. He joined the Victory at Chatham following Nelson's letter of 8 April. He served on it until he was promoted Lieutenant on 1 August (off Toulon, according to a letter from Nelson to Emma Hamilton), when he was posted to the Phoebe (ref: From Powder Monkey to Governor). Thank you, Fillthemill ( talk) 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Toddy1
Just a note about weights and measures in predominantly English-speaking countries.
Until the end of the 1960s, English-speaking countries used Imperial or the closely related US Customary measures. Then there was a movement to adopt the metric system. This was largely successful in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and the Irish Republic, somewhat less successful in Canada, only partially successful in the UK and largely a failure in the US. To find out more about metrication in various countries, follow this link: [18]. Michael Glass ( talk) 00:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Should I tell interpol that you support extremism?? 216.177.129.181 ( talk) 00:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Accusing other editors now? Your edits have been followed closely. This is your last warning. 216.177.129.202 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
There is mention of you on the Wikipedia Administrative board/Incidents [19]. Xtremedood ( talk) 14:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
Iryna Harpy (
talk) 01:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
There is mention of you on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, over here [20]. Xtremedood ( talk) 11:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Index of Afghanistan-related articles may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Why did you completely reverse the whole edit? You referred to better citations, yet I didn't remove any, and you just restored a version that was marked as lacking a citation. And if the issue is the BBC documentary, well, obviously your reaction is out of proportion given that was only one line - and if you want to dispute it, I would argue that if you want to argue the BBC are in the habit of doing poor documentaries, or indeed that there are other better ones out there, I would expect to see some evidence of that. Yandrossss ( talk) 20:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I want to raise a notice to all,the editor has no competent to make the editing the subject of Indian atheist biography.I am member of Wikipedia atheism project raised the issue for the project discussion.he is not aware of the names and sir name of Telugu people.he deleted without giving any reasons despite my request,so I reverted his editing.he has no idea of Indian local names as he is not Indian.
Will Talk2 ( talk) 17:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I deleted the section in the saber-toothed cat based on the guideline at WP:NOCITE. Also why did you just do a wholesale revert of all of my change even though you where only concern ed with part of my edit. 203.173.186.163 ( talk) 19:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
не могли бы вы участвовать эту дискуссию на странице обсуждения "Битва Кербеле"? Спасибо. Mhhossein ( talk) 18:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Mhhossein:, @ Edward321: I would be grateful if you would cast your eyes over Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles/Citing Quran#Citing the Quran for instances when people quoted the Quran-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey I noticed your recent to Husayn ibn Ali. After you replaced the http by https, some of the links don't work (some of them don't work for me!). Please check them once again. Mhhossein ( talk) 07:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
There's a SPA adding original research to the article. More eyes would be appreciated. Edward321 ( talk) 04:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 03:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Please consider striking out the uncivil comment you made here . You can also re-word it calmly and neutrally (the last lines!). Civility is part of Wikipedia's code of conduct and one of its five pillars -- Mhhossein ( talk) 13:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Added the article as per your request. Edward321 ( talk) 16:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Toddy 1, you must be aware that I have recently been indefinitely blocked for the pictures of Victoria Nuland you placed on my talk page, since I mentioned you multiple times. I must say that I fail to understand why you never intervened to say that I had not asked for these images. Don't you think it was your moral duty to do so? Especially considering that you have nothing to fear? Unlike me, you are not someone that can be thrown into the waste basket for something like this. This has seriously affected me morally, and I hope that you will have the kindness to provide me with an answer. Γνῶθι σεαυτόν ( talk) 23:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
My understanding was that Againstdisinformation was blocked for being WP:NOT HERE. My understanding is that this occurred because of an overall pattern of behaviour. I do not think that it happened because of any one incident. It may have been because of a "straw that broke the camel's back". When I looked at the pattern of edits in late August-early September 2015 on Anna Politkovskaya and the bizarre arguments at Talk:Anna Politkovskaya#Putin's Birthday & the lead, I got the impression of Againstdisinformation was someone who was arguing that black was white. (I noted that Drmies was supporting Againstdisinformation on that occasion.) I do not know whether the indefinite block of Againstdisinformation was the right thing to do. I do not think that it was in any way my doing.
The point that was made by the post containing the photos is that some Wikipedia articles are like adverts for their subjects.
I knew that it was being claimed that my actions had something to do with Againstdisinformation's block was when I kept being alerted that my ID was appearing on his/her talk page. I did not regard the claims as true. It seemed to me that they were just a pretext. I was mildly glad that Againstdisinformation was eventually given an unblock offer. (No doubt Drmies can use his/her admin tools to verify that I thanked Vanjagenije.)
In case you have not understood the phrase "just a pretext". You were not really blocked because you reverted the admin's deletion of something on your talk page. You were blocked because of an overall pattern of behaviour convinced people that you were WP:NOT HERE. Reverting the admin who was disciplining you was not smart; it escalating the situation. It did not matter what the revert was.
I had no awareness whatsoever that using the photos, to make the point that Wikipedia articles sometimes look like adverts, was a breach of BLP rules.
As for intervening, I asked myself some questions:
-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
By the way, I saw your posts at Talk:RT (TV network). "Long live Animal Farm... Napoleon is always right.".-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Without getting into anything else, as someone who happened to see the unblock discussion at ANI and then went from curiosity (partly because of the very interesting former username that former AgainstDisinformation was forced to change) i saw very good editing, and i saw rather good behavior on the talk pages. I am very convinced by all the evidence i've seen at article talk pages and edits to content, that former AgainstDisinformation is definitely WP:HERE. Their arguments are coherent and on topic and generally not causing drama except in responding to drama levied against them. Γνῶθι σεαυτόν is WP:HERE from everything i have seen in their edit history in the article talk pages and content edits. SageRad ( talk) 14:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
At Talk:Aisha there is an IP, 5.107.81.9 who started editing 11/26 and has only edited that talk page. [21] They are clearly a SPA, but when I add that tag they repeatedly remove it. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] Their edit summaries claim to cite Template:Spa, but I don't see anything in the template that matches what they claim to quote. Any suggestions? Edward321 ( talk) 03:35, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Battle of Karbala. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. to be precise, insisting on retention of biased content. DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Toddy, why have you reverted all my changes? -- Maryanne.al (talk}09:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tor (disambiguation). Please see Talk:Tor#Requested_move_10_December_2015 In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for finding the move from Tor to Tor (rock formation). Could you help me find out why I couldn't see it in the page's move log? I clicked on "View logs for this page" from the page history and I see "No matching items in log" for both "All public logs" [33] and "Move log" [34]. Is it possible to find when the article was moved from the move log page?-- Wikimedes ( talk) 20:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to bother, I think the Islam article has a lot of poor editing put in by anyone with an axe to grind and needs a lot of cleaning up. I am trying to do that but am in a little trouble by editors who get scared by the red negative sign of the history page showing net negative reduction in the article and so restore to previous versions. If you do not mind, could we get your input on the talk page since you seem to be involved with the article before? Sodicadl ( talk) 18:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
What is your problem??? What is Svoboda has anything to do with this? We ARE writing in Engish Wikipedia, NOT in Svoboda publication. There is convention which I mentioned for my revert and it have nothing to do with Svoboda publications. Why do not you familiarize yourself with it. We can talk about, instead of calling each other names. Would not it more constructive way to deal with it? Wikipedia is not your personal webpage either to lay claim on it. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 19:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Toddy, I would like to know your take on the Cossack Hetmanate article where a user insists to call the it a protectorate of the Ottoman Empire in the infobx, placing WP:UNDUE weight on the Ukrainian-Ottoman relationship, but also cherry-picking the sources to make it look like an Ottoman dependency, when it was more of a military alliance. Thanks,-- Bogu Slav 20:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi. I've tried to improve my edits as you requested. Have a good 2016 :) Spiritofstgeorge ( talk) 13:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/31.154.167.98 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов ( talk • contribs) 22:56, 7 January 2016
He has multiply anonimious clones vandalizing the Karait page . Need admin help. Неполканов ( talk) 20:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I think we need to discuss your "across the board" and unilateral reverts of some of my recent edits. Please bring your issues to Talk:Karait#Disruptive_edits. And what is all this about being a sock of Kaz? Thank you. YuHuw ( talk) 06:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Karait shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. You have declined comment on your actions. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- YuHuw ( talk) 11:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
YuHuw (
talk •
contribs) 18:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Toddy. Maybe you will be interested to say your opinion at Talk:Mohammed Omar#Unsourced POV pushing by User:Sundostund. I assume you are more experienced in dealing with this user, and in Afghan-related subjects in general. Just to know - I have no intention to enter an edit war with him over this. -- Sundostund ( talk) 14:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Krzyhorse22 (
talk) 02:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Toddy how are you these days -- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 22:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Fajr decade —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 03:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 03:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 14:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
How goes the SPI? 12:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.139.189 ( talk)
I am mostly fine; just getting older, and sometimes wiser. As always I have different ideas on the go, but find I have to prioritise time, so some things take a while to get finished. One of the great things about Wikipedia is that it is mind-expanding. I find I have to order through the mail and read books that would otherwise never have heard of to understand what issues are about. Some things I want to do, I start, but through reading and trying to work out a solution I discover that the problem is more complex than I imagined, and in some cases that it is beyond my present ability to solve. In some cases I discover that the people I firmly believed were wrong, were actually right or partially right.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I started work on the Succession to Muhammad page [38] a few years ago and then stopped because there were a lot of contradictions in the various texts. And a lot of politics. So I have been digging around. Do you know much about this subject. -- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 22:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
This [39] was you wasn't it? Your agenda has become clear. 87.71.129.210 ( talk) 19:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Family tree of Ali —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 84.13.126.205 ( talk) 15:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
I pinged you, but just for good measure: please see the close here: [40] -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Oh yeah, because using brackets instead of braces puts a link to the "Ping" article and then renames the link as the name of the person you're trying to ping, haha! Thanks. 75.162.244.4 ( talk) 01:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Go see it! --The user whose IP address is now 75.162.244.4 ( talk) because of its being dynamic; NOT because of falsely supposed "intended IP-hopping."
I see that you're aware that I've been talking to you now. So when will you be discussing the ridiculous reversions that have been happening at Ray Combs? --The user whose IP address is now 75.162.244.4 ( talk) because of its being dynamic; NOT because of falsely supposed "intended IP-hopping." —Preceding undated comment added 00:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I've made some follow-ups to your replies at
Talk:Ray Combs. By now I have a new ISP-assigned address, but it's just natural for that to happen, and the block on my old address is long-over. See you over there, please, huh?
75.162.239.1 (
talk) 06:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Email
I have sent you an email, Toddy. User:Who R U?, if you delete this message, it won't help, since I've already emailed Toddy1. So good luck with trying to cover up your vandalism. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 08:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Toddy1,
I tried to summarize the engagement, but received no feedback. The battle took place on a much later date. Could you please leave your opinion?
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kliment_Voroshilov_tank#Krasnogvardeysk_copyright_issue
Thanks! Kawinksy ( talk) 18:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Dear Toddy1, I hope you are fine. I'll be very grateful if you'll please take a look at recent edits on the iERA page, and my comments on its talk page. Thank you. My regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 16:41, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Your recent replying on Talk:Dnipropetrovsk is bordering Wikipedia:UNCIVIL. Obviously this kind of behaviour is not wanted by the Wikipedia community. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 20:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I do see..... But initially it came across to me that you wanted no mention of smog in Dnipropetrovsk what sour ever.... Communications can be interpreted differently... and have done this. Sorry about that! It is not easy to talk to people who you don't see..... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Everytime I put the word Syed in Muslim articles you remove them and allege vanda;lism what are you trying to hide they are an important caste of descendants of Prophet Muhammad are you Christian or a secret Muslim who wants to hide that Syeds exist in this world please reply. Arindami34 ( talk) 07:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply Sir your obviously not a Muslim but dont want me to do edits to articles but stay in my own world I will do as u advice though mentions of Syeds should be on most articles of Islam to understand Islam completely and better. Arindami34 ( talk) 07:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The Brahmin article needs to have it as a comparison of the castes I will put it in See also,hope you stop seeing my user contributions and revert less of them and call less of them as vandalism. Arindami34 ( talk) 07:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Toddy1,
I am not in an edit war. I had a trouble with properly covering the URL & adding the book citation. I think Edward321 will agree on my source now.
/info/en/?search=Hasan_ibn_Ali#Events_Surrounding_his_Death — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWikiManRules ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Greetings, Tody! I just meant that it was not an invasion because the Ghassanid/ Byzantines technically attacked the Caliphate first because they killed an emissary in the events leading up to the first Battle of Mutah. This is why I have reverted it temporarily and I have used the talk page as well to see what you think. Tell me your advice, please. And thank you for letting me know! From: 137.74.154.248 ( talk) 05:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Toddy1, thanks for this edit, but unfortunately it has been reverted for several reasons. Firstly any outcome decisions made at Talk:Dnipropetrovsk bear no impact on any decisions made on Eurovision articles. They are different topics, and under different WikiProjects. Secondly, the city in Ukraine has been renamed as part of the 2015 Decommunization in Ukraine law. This source does verify that the Ukrainian parliament voted 247-97 on May 19 to rename the third-largest city of Dnipropetrovsk, to Dnipro. Just thought I'd point this out. I personally think the city article needs to be re-addressed to show this change of newly voted common name. Thirdly, there are independent sources in relation to the Eurovision article which use the name "Dnipro", and seeing as we are suppose to cite from what sources use in order to verify accurately, then we would go off what those sources use, some of which are published by the European Broadcasting Union - organiser for the Eurovision Song Contest. If you still feel there is an issue, then raise it as a new topic at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2017. Regards, Wes Mouse ✒ 07:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dnipropetrovsk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- -- Panam2014 ( talk) 15:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
i just made an account- LebanonisArab ( talk) 10:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You're welcome. I found the article with no citations for a lot of information, and I'm trying to expand it. I have little knowledge of Russian, but I'll try to find new references for the data included in the article. The statements about her family were already there when I started editing the article, but if you want to delete them since there are no citations, feel free to remove them. I thought about removing them, but since they were there, I kept them in case sources were found. Maybe a simple mention that she was married to Valentin Belkevich should be included in the introduction, since he was a public person as well and their marriage was covered by the media [42]. Lucas RdS ( talk) 18:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Toddy1! Thank you for your message. I indeed saw that I made a mistake with the centuries, good that you noticed it early. Alhaqiha ( talk) 15:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
I have hope would you understand English: Dnipro [1]-- Zvr ( talk) 12:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. That's someone from California who for months has been adding claims about an Afghan Royal Family working with the Israeli government and leaving weird threats on my talk page, is just an example. Doug Weller talk 08:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
You restored an unsourced red link here -- https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kharkiv&diff=736261363&oldid=736260154
You did not say why.
Please don't restore it again unless you write an article, or provide proper reliable sources showing notability. -- 2604:2000:E016:A700:659D:2E7B:5E48:EF51 ( talk) 08:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I will keep it in mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulQahaar ( talk • contribs) 09:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
i dont think that writing a soldier who lost his life against designated international terrorists a martyr violates neutrality. Also muslims consider it extremely insulting if a martyr is designated as killed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulQahaar ( talk • contribs) 11:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I have read dozens of articles on wikipedia in which soldiers who lost their life in battle are mentioned as martyrs. anyway writing a soldier who lost his life against terrorists as a martyr doesnt offend anybody but writing him as killed will offend a lot of pakistanis and muslims. I dont know why you are so intent on making a change that will offend a lot and please none. if you are still steadfast upon erasing the word martyr then please remove it from all other hundreds of similar wikipedia articles(in which the word martyr or martyrdom is mentioned other than in quotation eg articles about catholic martyrs, revolutionary martyrs,Sikh gurus, gallantry award recipients of many countries eg India etc). then I will also change it on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulQahaar ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Did you make any effort to view the one week long discussion on the talk page of Arab Christians? Its an extraordinary claim that is supported by few low-quality sources. Makeandtoss ( talk) 21:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
I revdeled a recent edit summary of yours. Let me know if you wish to discuss.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 12:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. I am currently working to improve the quality of the Hamza Tzortzis article on Wikipedia so that it meets several of Wikiepdia's guidelines. Could you please share your thoughts on a topic I opened on the talk page as you have been identified as a user who has edited the article recently? Thank you. Djrun ( talk) 17:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kremenchuk may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:26, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lowercase sigmabot III. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very
civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Dear colleague, please refrain from incorrect personal accusations you just made. I'm not a "spokesman/woman for the Russian government" and I don't think, that it's appropriate to label someone at all. BTW, I'm not opposed to inclusion that SCB of Crimea has been took over. Probably this variant will work? Seryo93 ( talk) 11:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
And moreover, WP:SYNTH: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources". Neither of these sources about takeover (references 4 and 5) explicitly called it a coup. Therefore, while it's pretty good to mention that SCB was captured by armed men, labeling it as a "coup" basing on these sources would violate SYNTH rule. And let me apologize for misunderstanding we had in regard to that deletion [of SCB takeover]. Bests, Seryo93 ( talk) 11:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't mind the spelling therefore you can simply change the American style (to which I am accustomed) to British. I've only tried to standarize the whole article which now uses both the American and British dialect. 85.202.42.2 ( talk) 10:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 02:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
pliz for the template *NATO designation for Russian and former Soviet Union missiles* + Surface-to-air missiles complete list
{{Navbox with collapsible groups
| name = Russian and Soviet missiles|SSM | title = NATO designation for Russian and former Soviet Union missiles | selected = | state = expanded | bodyclass = hlist
| group1 =
You can add this card to to the list of systems on this article (9K333 Verba (Willow) MANPADS)?
Surface-to-air missiles complete list + Ground based
SA-24 Grinch/Morfey +
9K333_Verba
I have created a draft article, Title taken from the article SA-24 Grinch. And she's standing in line to verify (I'm not asking you to check the article 9K333). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:9K333_Verba 89.105.158.243 ( talk) 17:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Unite Against Fascism may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Please do not revert my talk page again or I will have to report you for vandalism. WP:OWNTALK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.125.162 ( talk) 16:09, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks sorry I am not wikipedia savvy or wikipedia smart I guess some would call it. I appreciate you helping me out I always have the 4 ~ at the end of my message but it doesnt always show up. Have a good day! Keanderson5385 ( talk) 00:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Battle_of_Uhud&diff=629201371&oldid=629176034
Regarding this edit. You will see i have removed references that he used on talk page as it was effecting the talk page. I think turning a talk page into an article is also a breach of policy-- Misconceptions2 ( talk) 18:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for creating the great graphics on casualty rates by ship, in order of sailing, for the French & Spanish fleet vs. for the British fleet, used in the Battle of Trafalgar article, prominent at main page yesterday. Really great data-intensive graphics work, in spirit of great graphical design!
But see my small questions/requests at Talk:Battle of Trafalgar#great graphics but scaling needed, about possibly rescaling the graphics to be directly comparable to one another. And also about apparent discrepancies between percentages shown in graphic vs. appearing in supporting Order of battle at the Battle of Trafalgar article (which is stated to be source for graphic but doesn't match up exactly). Hope my comments are regarded as helpful in the spirit intended by me. Either way, thanks again for your prominent and great contributions! cheers, -- do ncr am 15:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Пока мелочи. Но, по всем признакам, это только начало. - Неполканов ( talk) 20:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Nope. 217.15.154.89 and 219.77.53.143 are not the same person. 219.77.53.143 ( talk) 09:25, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Thanks for your thoughtful input to the move discussion. Its semantics but I was wondering whether you could change your comment to something like:
Support a move but not to Salafism. This would at least keep the topic of a move on line.
Your input has really helped clarify things for me. I have been seeing label descriptions about the place and haven't been able to figure distinction from other terms. I was surprised to find that it was a neologism. What do you think of a merge to jihadism?
GregKaye ✍♪ 04:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
This edit was not a POV edit. It even has it on Ukrainian media-- Arbutus the tree ( talk) 03:23, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Respectable and Peer-Reviewed Article-Sources have been added to the edited articles in question (i.e. Italian Fascism). The neutral tone and encyclopaedic standard must be preserved at all time. It must be ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give undue weight to a particular view. The above mentioned is usually encountered when opinions are stated as facts or poor sources are used. W must strive balanced set of information about the subject and not create a coatrack that goes out of its way to find facts that support a particular bias: An appropriate response to a coatrack article is to be bold and trim off excessive biased content ( WP:CHERRY)! See also WP:WEIGHT , WP:YESPOV and WP:NOR. I am sorry if this was not a case of WP:VAN, but do please join in the discussion on the talk page of the relevant WP article. Cheers, No Source - No Valid Source ( talk) 12:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 16:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Hasan ibn Ali may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:44, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Hannelore Kohl may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for the note. It shows me I need to revisit that article. I have learned since crafting that article that the ADC troops were issued a mixture of M-1 Garands and M1 Carbines. While it was thought the carbine would be better fitted to the short-statured recruits, many of them wanted the Garand for its extra range and power.
As to pallet loading—I am pretty much quoting the source. Just speculating (ORIGINAL RESEARCH WARNING!), I should think one would like weapons and ammo lashed together on the same pallet in case you needed them immediately after landing. For instance, to deal with your enemy, who is trying to chase down those same parachuted weapons.
I will have to mull my mind a bit to recall just where I saw that additional info, so it may be a bit before I revise the article.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 04:05, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Toddy1,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Iryna Harpy (
talk) 22:38, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
A Russian IP editor got blocked for edit-warring to impose his/her personal analyses on an article, so he responds "I am a... reservist psychological warfare officer! No doubt he was only obeying orders, lol.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Turkic people is not the only article where O.Turani has been adding unsourced claims that historical figures are of specific ethnicity. They have done the same repeatedly at Uzbeks [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. They eventually mention a source [7] but the source directly contradicts O.Turani's claim, say the Timurids were "rivals and opponents of the Uzbeks". [8] In spite of this, O.Turani continues to add claims that the Timurids were Uzbeks. [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] Edward321 ( talk) 01:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
And the first sock appears. [17] Already reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/O.Turani Edward321 ( talk) 17:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
No problem. EkoGraf ( talk) 13:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
He is famous dead link now . Recently his page was removed from owned by him domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов ( talk • contribs) 19:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Husayn ibn Ali. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: 1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made. 2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Ialiabbas ( talk) 15:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about the link to the discussion. I definitely do not mind. Edward321 ( talk) 01:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Please join in the discussion /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#.22Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation.22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Виктор Ш. ( talk • contribs) 22:25, 3 March 2015
As you've started an RM where I had an RFC, would you please clearly state your position on the naming issue? As it stands, it isn't clear where you stand, despite the fact that it is your RM. RGloucester — ☎ 02:08, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, but my edit was but an informative addition, which is relevant given the de-facto status. In fact the whole sentence, was copied word for word from the Donetsk article entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.188.125.25 ( talk) 09:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
I am creating a new article. please help me. — Preceding Abdullah Al Wasif comment added 13:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Why did you deleted all the demographic data from the page(Salafi movement). Wahhabism is a synonyms of Salafism (The term is mostly used for the Saudi form of salafism).
Even those who distinguished Wahhabism from salafism called it a type of salafism.Even they did not say that wahhabism is not salafism.They meant that the Wahhabism, that was the old conservative movement in Saudi Arabia, was different from modern Salafism, influenced by the 19th Century Islamic modernists' movement, Qutbism etc.
Ejaz92 (
talk) 06:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello and thanks for correcting my English spelling. But You are wrong in who first occupied this city, today's Lviv. In brief - at 1.September 1939 Nazi Germany began to invade Poland. Two days later the UK and France declared war on Nazi Germany. But on 17.September also the Soviet Union invaded the eastern parts of Poland as agreed in the previously secret part of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and at 23.September 1939 Poland surrendered. The USSR assult "in Poland's back" became a very "cheap" conquest for the USSR, as a large majority of the remaining Polish resistance was involved in fighting the nazists in the west. Lwow was a part of "the USSR prey" in eastern Poland - between (around) 17.September 1939 and some day or so after 22.June 1941, when Hitler launched his war against the Soviet Union. But the fact Hitler later fooled Stalin, doesn't change the history of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, in which Germany got most of Poland (as of 1939 borders) and Soviet Union got the most eastern parts of Poland together with the three Baltic nations and Finland. Finland managed though amazingly resist the USSR attack in November 1939. If You simply ment Germany attacked Poland before the Soviet Union also did so, then You are of cource right. Cheers Boeing720 ( talk) 22:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
The above description is too vague. It should not be included unless you also include the reasons for such claims. Its also not NPOV because it tries to influence the reader without any arguments. Nasluds ( talk) 22:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
79.109.203.252 (
talk) 15:07, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
79.109.203.252 (
talk) 09:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 06:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I have no problem with being quoted in the the [ SPI case]. However, looking at the case you have raised, you seem to have quoted me out of context. My comment was in connection with a sockpuppetry issue which became [ this] SPI case. I believe that I B Wright's comment was for the same sockpuppetry issue as he made reference to the same 4RR revert.
I therefore have to point out that you seem to have raised an SPI case against Kaz without any evidence. However, I have taken the liberty of linking the two cases.
I have also requested semi protection of Crimean Karaites. DieSwartzPunkt ( talk) 13:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Per wp:burden -- when an article has been tagged as needing refs for two years, and the text has been challenged and deleted - only restore it if you provide inline RS refs. Thank you. -- Epeefleche ( talk) 07:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Were you aware of this "guideline"? Apparently it was written by only two editors and they are claiming it represents a consensus. -- Taivo ( talk) 03:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
re John Hindmarsh. Please revert your edit deleting his service on the Victory. He joined the Victory at Chatham following Nelson's letter of 8 April. He served on it until he was promoted Lieutenant on 1 August (off Toulon, according to a letter from Nelson to Emma Hamilton), when he was posted to the Phoebe (ref: From Powder Monkey to Governor). Thank you, Fillthemill ( talk) 17:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Toddy1
Just a note about weights and measures in predominantly English-speaking countries.
Until the end of the 1960s, English-speaking countries used Imperial or the closely related US Customary measures. Then there was a movement to adopt the metric system. This was largely successful in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and the Irish Republic, somewhat less successful in Canada, only partially successful in the UK and largely a failure in the US. To find out more about metrication in various countries, follow this link: [18]. Michael Glass ( talk) 00:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Should I tell interpol that you support extremism?? 216.177.129.181 ( talk) 00:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Accusing other editors now? Your edits have been followed closely. This is your last warning. 216.177.129.202 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
There is mention of you on the Wikipedia Administrative board/Incidents [19]. Xtremedood ( talk) 14:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
Iryna Harpy (
talk) 01:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
There is mention of you on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard, over here [20]. Xtremedood ( talk) 11:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Index of Afghanistan-related articles may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Why did you completely reverse the whole edit? You referred to better citations, yet I didn't remove any, and you just restored a version that was marked as lacking a citation. And if the issue is the BBC documentary, well, obviously your reaction is out of proportion given that was only one line - and if you want to dispute it, I would argue that if you want to argue the BBC are in the habit of doing poor documentaries, or indeed that there are other better ones out there, I would expect to see some evidence of that. Yandrossss ( talk) 20:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I want to raise a notice to all,the editor has no competent to make the editing the subject of Indian atheist biography.I am member of Wikipedia atheism project raised the issue for the project discussion.he is not aware of the names and sir name of Telugu people.he deleted without giving any reasons despite my request,so I reverted his editing.he has no idea of Indian local names as he is not Indian.
Will Talk2 ( talk) 17:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I deleted the section in the saber-toothed cat based on the guideline at WP:NOCITE. Also why did you just do a wholesale revert of all of my change even though you where only concern ed with part of my edit. 203.173.186.163 ( talk) 19:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
не могли бы вы участвовать эту дискуссию на странице обсуждения "Битва Кербеле"? Спасибо. Mhhossein ( talk) 18:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
@ Mhhossein:, @ Edward321: I would be grateful if you would cast your eyes over Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles/Citing Quran#Citing the Quran for instances when people quoted the Quran-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey I noticed your recent to Husayn ibn Ali. After you replaced the http by https, some of the links don't work (some of them don't work for me!). Please check them once again. Mhhossein ( talk) 07:14, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
There's a SPA adding original research to the article. More eyes would be appreciated. Edward321 ( talk) 04:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 03:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Please consider striking out the uncivil comment you made here . You can also re-word it calmly and neutrally (the last lines!). Civility is part of Wikipedia's code of conduct and one of its five pillars -- Mhhossein ( talk) 13:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Added the article as per your request. Edward321 ( talk) 16:30, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Toddy 1, you must be aware that I have recently been indefinitely blocked for the pictures of Victoria Nuland you placed on my talk page, since I mentioned you multiple times. I must say that I fail to understand why you never intervened to say that I had not asked for these images. Don't you think it was your moral duty to do so? Especially considering that you have nothing to fear? Unlike me, you are not someone that can be thrown into the waste basket for something like this. This has seriously affected me morally, and I hope that you will have the kindness to provide me with an answer. Γνῶθι σεαυτόν ( talk) 23:11, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
My understanding was that Againstdisinformation was blocked for being WP:NOT HERE. My understanding is that this occurred because of an overall pattern of behaviour. I do not think that it happened because of any one incident. It may have been because of a "straw that broke the camel's back". When I looked at the pattern of edits in late August-early September 2015 on Anna Politkovskaya and the bizarre arguments at Talk:Anna Politkovskaya#Putin's Birthday & the lead, I got the impression of Againstdisinformation was someone who was arguing that black was white. (I noted that Drmies was supporting Againstdisinformation on that occasion.) I do not know whether the indefinite block of Againstdisinformation was the right thing to do. I do not think that it was in any way my doing.
The point that was made by the post containing the photos is that some Wikipedia articles are like adverts for their subjects.
I knew that it was being claimed that my actions had something to do with Againstdisinformation's block was when I kept being alerted that my ID was appearing on his/her talk page. I did not regard the claims as true. It seemed to me that they were just a pretext. I was mildly glad that Againstdisinformation was eventually given an unblock offer. (No doubt Drmies can use his/her admin tools to verify that I thanked Vanjagenije.)
In case you have not understood the phrase "just a pretext". You were not really blocked because you reverted the admin's deletion of something on your talk page. You were blocked because of an overall pattern of behaviour convinced people that you were WP:NOT HERE. Reverting the admin who was disciplining you was not smart; it escalating the situation. It did not matter what the revert was.
I had no awareness whatsoever that using the photos, to make the point that Wikipedia articles sometimes look like adverts, was a breach of BLP rules.
As for intervening, I asked myself some questions:
-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:21, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
By the way, I saw your posts at Talk:RT (TV network). "Long live Animal Farm... Napoleon is always right.".-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Without getting into anything else, as someone who happened to see the unblock discussion at ANI and then went from curiosity (partly because of the very interesting former username that former AgainstDisinformation was forced to change) i saw very good editing, and i saw rather good behavior on the talk pages. I am very convinced by all the evidence i've seen at article talk pages and edits to content, that former AgainstDisinformation is definitely WP:HERE. Their arguments are coherent and on topic and generally not causing drama except in responding to drama levied against them. Γνῶθι σεαυτόν is WP:HERE from everything i have seen in their edit history in the article talk pages and content edits. SageRad ( talk) 14:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
At Talk:Aisha there is an IP, 5.107.81.9 who started editing 11/26 and has only edited that talk page. [21] They are clearly a SPA, but when I add that tag they repeatedly remove it. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] Their edit summaries claim to cite Template:Spa, but I don't see anything in the template that matches what they claim to quote. Any suggestions? Edward321 ( talk) 03:35, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
Battle of Karbala. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. to be precise, insisting on retention of biased content. DGG ( talk ) 01:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Toddy, why have you reverted all my changes? -- Maryanne.al (talk}09:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Tor (disambiguation). Please see Talk:Tor#Requested_move_10_December_2015 In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for finding the move from Tor to Tor (rock formation). Could you help me find out why I couldn't see it in the page's move log? I clicked on "View logs for this page" from the page history and I see "No matching items in log" for both "All public logs" [33] and "Move log" [34]. Is it possible to find when the article was moved from the move log page?-- Wikimedes ( talk) 20:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Sorry to bother, I think the Islam article has a lot of poor editing put in by anyone with an axe to grind and needs a lot of cleaning up. I am trying to do that but am in a little trouble by editors who get scared by the red negative sign of the history page showing net negative reduction in the article and so restore to previous versions. If you do not mind, could we get your input on the talk page since you seem to be involved with the article before? Sodicadl ( talk) 18:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
What is your problem??? What is Svoboda has anything to do with this? We ARE writing in Engish Wikipedia, NOT in Svoboda publication. There is convention which I mentioned for my revert and it have nothing to do with Svoboda publications. Why do not you familiarize yourself with it. We can talk about, instead of calling each other names. Would not it more constructive way to deal with it? Wikipedia is not your personal webpage either to lay claim on it. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 19:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi Toddy, I would like to know your take on the Cossack Hetmanate article where a user insists to call the it a protectorate of the Ottoman Empire in the infobx, placing WP:UNDUE weight on the Ukrainian-Ottoman relationship, but also cherry-picking the sources to make it look like an Ottoman dependency, when it was more of a military alliance. Thanks,-- Bogu Slav 20:57, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hi. I've tried to improve my edits as you requested. Have a good 2016 :) Spiritofstgeorge ( talk) 13:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/31.154.167.98 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Неполканов ( talk • contribs) 22:56, 7 January 2016
He has multiply anonimious clones vandalizing the Karait page . Need admin help. Неполканов ( talk) 20:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
I think we need to discuss your "across the board" and unilateral reverts of some of my recent edits. Please bring your issues to Talk:Karait#Disruptive_edits. And what is all this about being a sock of Kaz? Thank you. YuHuw ( talk) 06:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Karait shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. You have declined comment on your actions. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- YuHuw ( talk) 11:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
YuHuw (
talk •
contribs) 18:00, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Toddy. Maybe you will be interested to say your opinion at Talk:Mohammed Omar#Unsourced POV pushing by User:Sundostund. I assume you are more experienced in dealing with this user, and in Afghan-related subjects in general. Just to know - I have no intention to enter an edit war with him over this. -- Sundostund ( talk) 14:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Krzyhorse22 (
talk) 02:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Toddy how are you these days -- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 22:05, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Fajr decade —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 03:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
FreeatlastChitchat ( talk) 03:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 14:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
How goes the SPI? 12:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.139.189 ( talk)
I am mostly fine; just getting older, and sometimes wiser. As always I have different ideas on the go, but find I have to prioritise time, so some things take a while to get finished. One of the great things about Wikipedia is that it is mind-expanding. I find I have to order through the mail and read books that would otherwise never have heard of to understand what issues are about. Some things I want to do, I start, but through reading and trying to work out a solution I discover that the problem is more complex than I imagined, and in some cases that it is beyond my present ability to solve. In some cases I discover that the people I firmly believed were wrong, were actually right or partially right.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I started work on the Succession to Muhammad page [38] a few years ago and then stopped because there were a lot of contradictions in the various texts. And a lot of politics. So I have been digging around. Do you know much about this subject. -- Johnleeds1 ( talk) 22:57, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
This [39] was you wasn't it? Your agenda has become clear. 87.71.129.210 ( talk) 19:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Family tree of Ali —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 84.13.126.205 ( talk) 15:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
I pinged you, but just for good measure: please see the close here: [40] -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 19:31, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Oh yeah, because using brackets instead of braces puts a link to the "Ping" article and then renames the link as the name of the person you're trying to ping, haha! Thanks. 75.162.244.4 ( talk) 01:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Go see it! --The user whose IP address is now 75.162.244.4 ( talk) because of its being dynamic; NOT because of falsely supposed "intended IP-hopping."
I see that you're aware that I've been talking to you now. So when will you be discussing the ridiculous reversions that have been happening at Ray Combs? --The user whose IP address is now 75.162.244.4 ( talk) because of its being dynamic; NOT because of falsely supposed "intended IP-hopping." —Preceding undated comment added 00:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Okay, I've made some follow-ups to your replies at
Talk:Ray Combs. By now I have a new ISP-assigned address, but it's just natural for that to happen, and the block on my old address is long-over. See you over there, please, huh?
75.162.239.1 (
talk) 06:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Email
I have sent you an email, Toddy. User:Who R U?, if you delete this message, it won't help, since I've already emailed Toddy1. So good luck with trying to cover up your vandalism. Cheers. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 08:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 12:45, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Toddy1,
I tried to summarize the engagement, but received no feedback. The battle took place on a much later date. Could you please leave your opinion?
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kliment_Voroshilov_tank#Krasnogvardeysk_copyright_issue
Thanks! Kawinksy ( talk) 18:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Dear Toddy1, I hope you are fine. I'll be very grateful if you'll please take a look at recent edits on the iERA page, and my comments on its talk page. Thank you. My regards, George Custer's Sabre ( talk) 16:41, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Your recent replying on Talk:Dnipropetrovsk is bordering Wikipedia:UNCIVIL. Obviously this kind of behaviour is not wanted by the Wikipedia community. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 20:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
I do see..... But initially it came across to me that you wanted no mention of smog in Dnipropetrovsk what sour ever.... Communications can be interpreted differently... and have done this. Sorry about that! It is not easy to talk to people who you don't see..... — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:26, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Everytime I put the word Syed in Muslim articles you remove them and allege vanda;lism what are you trying to hide they are an important caste of descendants of Prophet Muhammad are you Christian or a secret Muslim who wants to hide that Syeds exist in this world please reply. Arindami34 ( talk) 07:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply Sir your obviously not a Muslim but dont want me to do edits to articles but stay in my own world I will do as u advice though mentions of Syeds should be on most articles of Islam to understand Islam completely and better. Arindami34 ( talk) 07:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The Brahmin article needs to have it as a comparison of the castes I will put it in See also,hope you stop seeing my user contributions and revert less of them and call less of them as vandalism. Arindami34 ( talk) 07:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello Toddy1,
I am not in an edit war. I had a trouble with properly covering the URL & adding the book citation. I think Edward321 will agree on my source now.
/info/en/?search=Hasan_ibn_Ali#Events_Surrounding_his_Death — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWikiManRules ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Greetings, Tody! I just meant that it was not an invasion because the Ghassanid/ Byzantines technically attacked the Caliphate first because they killed an emissary in the events leading up to the first Battle of Mutah. This is why I have reverted it temporarily and I have used the talk page as well to see what you think. Tell me your advice, please. And thank you for letting me know! From: 137.74.154.248 ( talk) 05:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Toddy1, thanks for this edit, but unfortunately it has been reverted for several reasons. Firstly any outcome decisions made at Talk:Dnipropetrovsk bear no impact on any decisions made on Eurovision articles. They are different topics, and under different WikiProjects. Secondly, the city in Ukraine has been renamed as part of the 2015 Decommunization in Ukraine law. This source does verify that the Ukrainian parliament voted 247-97 on May 19 to rename the third-largest city of Dnipropetrovsk, to Dnipro. Just thought I'd point this out. I personally think the city article needs to be re-addressed to show this change of newly voted common name. Thirdly, there are independent sources in relation to the Eurovision article which use the name "Dnipro", and seeing as we are suppose to cite from what sources use in order to verify accurately, then we would go off what those sources use, some of which are published by the European Broadcasting Union - organiser for the Eurovision Song Contest. If you still feel there is an issue, then raise it as a new topic at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2017. Regards, Wes Mouse ✒ 07:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Dnipropetrovsk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- -- Panam2014 ( talk) 15:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
i just made an account- LebanonisArab ( talk) 10:51, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi! You're welcome. I found the article with no citations for a lot of information, and I'm trying to expand it. I have little knowledge of Russian, but I'll try to find new references for the data included in the article. The statements about her family were already there when I started editing the article, but if you want to delete them since there are no citations, feel free to remove them. I thought about removing them, but since they were there, I kept them in case sources were found. Maybe a simple mention that she was married to Valentin Belkevich should be included in the introduction, since he was a public person as well and their marriage was covered by the media [42]. Lucas RdS ( talk) 18:16, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Toddy1! Thank you for your message. I indeed saw that I made a mistake with the centuries, good that you noticed it early. Alhaqiha ( talk) 15:32, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
I have hope would you understand English: Dnipro [1]-- Zvr ( talk) 12:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. That's someone from California who for months has been adding claims about an Afghan Royal Family working with the Israeli government and leaving weird threats on my talk page, is just an example. Doug Weller talk 08:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
You restored an unsourced red link here -- https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kharkiv&diff=736261363&oldid=736260154
You did not say why.
Please don't restore it again unless you write an article, or provide proper reliable sources showing notability. -- 2604:2000:E016:A700:659D:2E7B:5E48:EF51 ( talk) 08:24, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I will keep it in mind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulQahaar ( talk • contribs) 09:45, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
i dont think that writing a soldier who lost his life against designated international terrorists a martyr violates neutrality. Also muslims consider it extremely insulting if a martyr is designated as killed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulQahaar ( talk • contribs) 11:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
I have read dozens of articles on wikipedia in which soldiers who lost their life in battle are mentioned as martyrs. anyway writing a soldier who lost his life against terrorists as a martyr doesnt offend anybody but writing him as killed will offend a lot of pakistanis and muslims. I dont know why you are so intent on making a change that will offend a lot and please none. if you are still steadfast upon erasing the word martyr then please remove it from all other hundreds of similar wikipedia articles(in which the word martyr or martyrdom is mentioned other than in quotation eg articles about catholic martyrs, revolutionary martyrs,Sikh gurus, gallantry award recipients of many countries eg India etc). then I will also change it on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdulQahaar ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Did you make any effort to view the one week long discussion on the talk page of Arab Christians? Its an extraordinary claim that is supported by few low-quality sources. Makeandtoss ( talk) 21:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
I revdeled a recent edit summary of yours. Let me know if you wish to discuss.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 12:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. I am currently working to improve the quality of the Hamza Tzortzis article on Wikipedia so that it meets several of Wikiepdia's guidelines. Could you please share your thoughts on a topic I opened on the talk page as you have been identified as a user who has edited the article recently? Thank you. Djrun ( talk) 17:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)