Created Archive page for User talk: Tmol42
It doesn't look like you meant to reply to me here: [1], so would you mind changing the indenting or where you inserted the comment, or could I do it for you, otherwise it may confuse. thanks. John Hayes talk 11:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
The edit I made in Talk:Tottenham Hotspur F.C., was an edit of my previous post where I hadn't signed in and did not have my user name attributed to it. Surely, I am able to correct my own contributions? Is that within the Wikipedia rules? ( Atouraya ( talk) 01:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC))
Tmol42 ( talk) 09:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Asking someone who clearly shares your viewpoint on a matter can be considered canvassing. If you have sent out a notice on an issue you need to at least record this fact somewhere such as in actual discussion page for the topic in question.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Canvassing for more information.
Thanks -- Shakehandsman ( talk) 22:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
A title of UserTmol42/Sandbox1 was a namespace violation so something had to be done. On a brief inspection, it seemed eminently ready to become an article so I have moved it to railway time. In this case I think capitalisation may be appropriate: Railway Time. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 20:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
No need for you to be embarrassed - just blame it on me! The material covered by your article seems perfectly correct for the railway time title. There was little justification for redirecting to Madras time. I have seem the feeling expressed that articles should be moved into the article namespace as soon as possible because Wikipedia is collaborative. If you insist on continuing to sandbox it, then you can move it back to User:Tmol42/Sandbox1 yourself. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 21:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for not taking any further action because I do believe someone else, who has been vandalising Wikipedia, has the same IP address as me or something. However, the edit to the boat race was mad by me and i don't see why it is viewed as vandalism; all i did was change the format of the latest result to be consistent with that of previous results (i.e. Oxford wins are highlighted in dark blue) -- 212.120.248.142 ( talk) 14:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
I see now what I did. Let me assure you it was an accident and not vandalism. -- 212.120.248.142 ( talk) 17:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You might want to check the diff of Talk:Cholesbury, where you will find I didn't rate the article, contrary to your rather brisk claims ( WP:AGF?). I'm not going to get involved in any length of conversation with you, but you need to make sure that what you're accusing someone of is what they actually done. Also, please don't mess up my talk page by placing your note at a level 3 header, just use the [+] button to add a new comment, have the courtesy to leave a summary with your edit, and use the preview button to avoid making repeated edits. Severo T C 22:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I know nothing about article assessment. I would bring this up at the project's talk page. -- Roleplayer ( talk) 23:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey Tmol42, I've reverted the most recent IP edit. As far as I'm concerned, there's no verifiable evidence provided in that link and we shouldn't have to pay to see the links. It's tough because there's potential for the source to be reliable, for sure, but it can't be verified without payment which, in my opinion, makes it fail verifiability. Indeed, if this is significant then there should be a suitable, free alternative to verify the claim. All the best. The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you took part in the recent FLRC for List of Arsenal F.C. players and thought you might be interested in participating in a new discussion. The FLRC was closed as no consensus and it is clear the the issue of incompleteness in longer FLs is not over, so a discussion page has been started here. Please feel free to comment. -- Scorpion 0422 21:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
For the stats on the main Spurs page, Yeah I do feel that they would be better on the season page, since they are for the 2007-08 season, and it would be good to have all that information on the same place...about the commentary, because this is the first 'live' season paage and it was made more than half way through, I think people just continued listing the news on the main page out of habit so the duplication happen, I think when next season comes around and the season page is there from the start, I think the separation between detail and brief will come about naturally and if not, then it can talked about at the beginning of next season...I don't think the 2008-09 page can made now, because although the big news of modric signing it would still be a page of empty headings right now you know but not long after the season ends it could take shape...so about immediate matter, Yeah I agree that the stats should be on the season page, thanks, Prem4eva ( talk) 17:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you removed my polyphosphate section addition on the abiogenesis page. Why? Is it improper to link to a book so that people can read the actual model in detail? Should I have put a reference to the book with no link (title, year, etc)? Others seem to link to web pages of books and papers. What might I do to make it acceptable (in your opinion)? The abiogenesis page is in pretty sorry shape in my opinion. Another paragraph on polyphosphate and its possible role in abiogenesis seems more than justified.
Also, what is your expertise in polyphosphate and abiogenesis? Polyp2 ( talk) 04:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Why did you revert my edit to the talk page? This was hardly a constructive contribution. SteveO ( talk) 16:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edition? I've wroten it, because this is true - if you want, I can search sources, which will be accepct with my commentary. Alden or talk with Alden 22:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Could you please elaborate why you deleted the information provided by me? It was cited by all major Polish portals, including Wirtualna Polska, which is among top information portals of the country, I can provide tens of sources for it. Do not do it next time, as this is relevant and properly cited info. Tymek ( talk) 17:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Robbie Keane will be a Liverpool player by tuesday boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.30 ( talk) 20:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I have recieved a message saying that my contibitutions were vandalism, when I was adding players, their countries and statistics, as the page was maent to be expanded. I would like to know how this contributes as vadalism.
Thanks
Obiwanskywalker
Hi take a look at your edit to List of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. players, it left the page in a bit of a mess to be frank and you added a small amount of incorrect information. I have tied it a bit but it still needs a little more mmaintenance. As you had not corrected it was reverted and a polite message as per WP guidelines was added suggesting you take care with your edits and to use the sandbox if you need to test your edits first. Fine if it was a mistake on your behalf, and we all make errors from time to time, but the message was still appropriate, good luck Tmol42 ( talk) 12:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
OK thanks, I will try to be a bit more tidy next time. I admit that I did make a mistake or two, and because of that I am sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obiwanskywalker ( talk • contribs) 10:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
What is the template for the Ivory Coast, I can not seem to find it, if you respond then I will be able to tidy up the list of tottenham hotspur players page.
Obiwanskywalker ( talk) 21:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Try using
Ivory Coast I think it should work but you need to check the piping ( | ) carefully as it gets lost with the brackets ( {{ ) Also you need to crt the spelling of DZ, good luck
Tmol42 (
talk)
21:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
OK thanks, I have done that now, but have encountered another problem: flag of morroco. what link shouold I use? I have tried:{{flagcountry|Morroco}} and {{flagcountry|Kingdom of Morroco}} but neither of those seem to work.
-- Obiwanskywalker ( talk) 12:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Cheers for all of you help, I have now finished editing that page. The only link that does not work is the one for the brazillian left back gilberto. It does not seem to like the link, I do not whether this is because a page does not exist or if I am just spelling his name wrong. Get back to me if possible about this.
--
Obiwanskywalker (
talk)
15:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, I hadn't relised what the criteria for the notable players was, thanks for telling me.
-- Obiwanskywalker ( talk) 13:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Does Luca Modric count as a notable player? As he has agreed to play for the club and has played for Croatio after this agreement. I am not sure whether becuase of this he would be a notable player, or whether he would have to have played for us/taken part in training at WHL for him to count as a notable player
--
Obiwanskywalker (
talk)
10:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand how my edit was non-neutral.
my edit; "however, the argument is not just that the flagellum is complex! The bacterial flagellum, says Behe, could not work without about 40 protein components all organized in the right way and only about 10 of the 40 components can be explained by co-option, but the other 30 are brand new. [1] Also, the very process of assembly in the right sequence requires other regulatory machines, so is in itself irreducibly complex."
Please also explain how it can be considered vandalism.
66.74.230.117 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
"I could also comment on the nature and content of your edits but will leave it there."
No, go ahead. I gave a reference, I didn't go on a rampage, I didn't keep a certain point of view. I just added information that needed to be there to inform people what the argument was really about, that it's so complex that there couldn't have been co-option in acquiring the other 30 components. I'm also sorry for inserting the hidden comments, it wont happen again. 66.74.230.117 ( talk) 14:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Maybe I did over-react a bit, but I still feel that the full UK-settlement template is completely OTT for an urban CP. I think we need a different template. I'll take it to the UK Geography Project. Meanwhile, you could reinstate the infoboxes but I suggest that you look hard at which elements it is sensible to populate. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 16:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
There must be a problem with the system because the first 6 or eight times I checked on that user, it showed no contributions and no deleted contributions. It was only after Hut blocked him/her that the edits appeared. Thanks for your contributions. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot ( talk) 19:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you reverted one of my comments on the reference desk, without making any note of why you had done so. Why was this? 79.66.56.21 ( talk) 21:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I have replied at Talk:List of civil parishes in Buckinghamshire. Nice to know someone's taking note! Skinsmoke ( talk) 12:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
For some reason it's pretty hard to get people to actually comment, so since you reverted my edit, I invite you to voice your opinion at Template talk:Current sport#Adding & applying guidelines. :) -- Conti| ✉ 16:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I work in the education service in Bucks. Have I missed something? I'm certain the 12+ system is still in place. -- role player 12:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
OK, a break. I have replied you: Let's talk about that, please, on my page ( Category Generation) Franta Oashi ( talk) 23:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. The move was just to make the title consistent with the lead paragraph. Had the lead referred to him as "J.E.S. Lawrence" I would have moved it to that title (adding a space between the "S" and "Lawrence"). The article still needs some work though. If I have time I will take another look at it in a day or so. – ukexpat ( talk) 18:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, but I think you'll find it's User:RM-Taylor who changed the squad numbers. Mattythewhite ( talk) 20:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tmol52. I noticed that you mentioned Twitter was not allowed due to WP:V but I would direct you to WP:SELFPUB as I would imagine that Jozy is an authority as to where he will be playing. Also, you seemed to miss the other ESPNSoccernet.com link mentioned in the edit. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=665365&cc=5901 Garyhampson ( talk) 21:54, 05 Aug 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Just to say sorry for this edit. I've no idea how I managed to revert your addition - all I was trying to do was remove the flag. Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Are you saying that Cholesbury smock mill and Hawridge mill are one and the same? Mjroots ( talk) 17:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Bongo matic 14:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
I'll look around for sources, though I can't promise to devote myself to it. :) It looks like a nice article so far. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 17:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Claire Loewenfeld, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Loewenfeld. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongo matic 04:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thank you, that's very kind of you! I was thinking about you today, missing all the excitement. :) But it's all worked out pretty well. I'm going to be interested to see how much more we can find out about her. I suspect quite a lot actually; it's almost certainly just a question of finding the right books. Anyway, well done for all your research, and for starting the article in the first place. :) SlimVirgin talk| contribs 01:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
You missed the insertion of massive penises when rolling back vandalism on Human resources. Next time look more closely for vandalism covering vandalism. Fifelfoo ( talk) 10:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Buckinghamshire was part of Wessex in the Heptarchy. - Yorkshirian ( talk) 17:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I hadn't realised how much effort the guy (I assume it's a guy) had put into his fruitless and misguided task until I checked the IP history - seems he's been using more than one, presumably it changes irregularly, or perhaps he has access to more than one PC (maybe at a school or college? Seems it's impossible to convince him that the hills to the east of Streatley are the Berkshire Downs - or perhaps he's just being bloody minded and enjoying his little "joke"? There's already a history of warnings on his talk page, so an IP ban will have to follow if he persists. I could maybe check out the history of his other IPs also - they might well show similar activity on other pages and reveal a few more "sock puppet" addresses. I've checked out a few users that way, and uncovered a "spider's web" of SP userids or IP addresses. Just as well to make a complete job of it. I'll get on it tonight. Yours in frustration Ramble24 ( talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 20:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC).
Update - I've reported this user for vandalism - we'll see an IP block soon maybe? Rambler24 ( talk) 14:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42, I just got your message about the Cumulative Goal Difference chart - not sure why but it only just arrived - it might be because I am using WP Beta on several different computers in various places. So yes - move the chart to where you think best, In general they are used to give an overview of managerial performance, so the managers page was where I put it, but club stats makes sense too... or both maybe. Let me know what you want in way of explanation or re-design. -- Payo ( talk) 22:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
TMol42 - I resisted the temptation to put my currently available books back on the Onboarding page, given the discussions about deleting the whole article and my potential conflict of interest. Instead, I'm hoping you'll put them back. The argument is that they credibly contribute to knowledge. 1) They help people in new ways. "The New Leader's 100-Day Action Plan" helps leaders moving into new positions. "Onboarding" helps people hiring people to move into new positions. 2) Both were published by John Wiley and Sons, the world's largest business publisher. 3) I think your point about "The Total Onboarding Program" is right since it doesn't come out until next summer. It's listing should be delayed. Gbradt ( talk) 12:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
See this edit, we only block if they edit after a final warning. If you have questions leave a note on my talk page. Jeepday ( talk) 13:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I note your comment on the talk page of this article to the effect that my comment:
I am replying to you at the first opportunity, as I have been absent for a few days. What I have written here may seem rude, but in fact, I am seeking to comprehend why an editor would be so persisten in removing a scientific term in favour of a non-scientific term which has a primary meaning other than that intended. It seems clear that there is an agenda here, yet the editor denies this. The whole first paragraph contains inappropriate stuff, but the single word "realised" is an unacceptable way to described a "conclusion" drawn by a scientist after scientific study.
You remark that my point is well argued. The reason is that it comes from a sound base. However, this makes no impression upon the person that I referred to as suffering from either "lack of understanding" or "bloodymindedness". May I ask how you suggest getting this error corrected, when the editor returns the erroneous word every time it is changed?
Please put my use of the above terms down as stemming from my total "lack of understanding" of such behaviour in the face of commonsense and reason, and utter frustration caused by a person who is so persistent at maintaining what is wrong, while denying having an agenda for doing it.
Amandajm ( talk) 10:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Tmol42 why did you delete my post on the olympics 2012 about the song being sung that was true it wasnt fake —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubair171 ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubair171 ( talk • contribs) 08:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Even when you think it, and I'm not disagreeing with you, it never helps the situation to say it. Tim Vickers ( talk) 19:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
They are two different film series and having them on the same page is causing confusion. There is no need for discussion or "concensus". Please do not start edit warring. If you have a realistic reason for keeping the articles together, please state it at Talk:Kurt Wallander#Moves?. Bradley0110 ( talk) 18:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
I opened the discussion on this move. The discussion is still open, as far as I'm concerned; if you have any comments I'd like to hear them. Swanny18 ( talk) 19:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
PS I've reverted under BRD, for now. Swanny18 ( talk) 19:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem. Let me (or ANI) know if you see him/her continuing this trick under another account name. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 15:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
RE the tottenham hotspur page. they are the last english team to score 100 goals in a season [111] are they the only? the first or last or only team in england to win the 2nd and 1st division titles back to back. i think first. jimmy greaves was the first player to score 100 goals, if that was with spurs that should probably be mentioned. i think that's it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.10.45 ( talk) 19:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
yeah thanks. villa have scored the most, 128 or something and sunderland were the first. i'll check the tables..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.10.45 ( talk) 00:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC) everton did it in 1932. i might not add anything i mentioned but if you want to do. hey i can't edit the spurs page without an account. someone should add that they are the *last* team to score over 100 goals and the *last* team to win back to back 2nd and 1st division titles, finishing runners up the next year [as the table on that page shows]. also when that's mentioned mention that their manager invented the push and run to win those titles. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.10.45 ( talk) 00:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with you comprehensively. I have reverted your reversion and suggest that you take it to the aticle's talk page rather than engage in a reversion of reversions, etc.
A list must be referenced whether the references are in the article of the listed entity or not. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 22:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandal's edit to my userpage. Out of interest, do you have any idea what his gibberish actually meant? – Pee Jay 16:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
With reference to your point on the Onboarding talk page. After the discussion you referred to, and after a discussion about whether or not to delete the article in its entirety, it was decided to keep it and Mandesford drafted an article that lays out the key points in a coherent and understandable fashion.
I'm suggesting we should keep the article encyclopedic and keep out things that promote specific businesses like the direct links to Kaiser and Associates someone has put in their references to a book that has not yet even been published. Are you suggesting that "fairs fair" means we should do something different? I would hope not. A couple of years ago, this article was a hodge-podge of paragraphs promoting a range of onboarding services.
I've sworn off touching this article directly and have asked my various colleagues not to edit it directly to avoid any appearance of conflicts of interest. Having co-authored three books and innumerable articles on the subject and spending all my time thinking about onboarding in conjunction with our firm, PrimeGenesis, I have a long-standing deep interest in onboarding and continue to create new knowledge. (My latest piece is on "Leading through a Crisis - The New Leader's 100-Hour Action Plan"). I plan to continue to monitor the article and make suggestions in its talk page under my own name. I think I'm being open, straightforward and contributing to the common good - with nothing but good faith. Do you have suggestions for better ways for me to be involved? Gbradt ( talk) 10:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Are external links to company websites, like the one to Kaiser and Associates, OK now? Gbradt ( talk) 09:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have made a start at reactivating WikiProject Buckinghamshire after a short break. I am in the process of working on the front page at User:Roleplayer/Sandbox to make it more attractive and easier to navigate. My aim is to make the project a reference point for editors creating or working on Buckinghamshire-related articles.
A couple of days ago I moved anyone who hadn't edited the project in a while from the current members list to an inactive members list, and this includes you. If you are still interested in the project, or are still regularly updating Buckinghamshire articles then please move your name back to the current list (remembering to keep entries in alphabetic order). If you are no longer interested in this project, then you needn't do anything further.
Cheers!
-- role player 14:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
You seem to have accidentally created it in the wrong namespace. I moved it to your userspace. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 18:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42/Archive. Civil parishes in England, an article you have contributed to, has been reassessed to C class from Start class. Apparently many people watch and/or visit this page as an alternative to the broader Civil parishes article. I've quickly scanned it for needing a possible copy edit, but it already looks reasonably good to me. However, I did feel it just needs a little attention such as adding more inline refs. It's not tagged or anything, but if you can help ut with a source or two, it would be much appreciated. Perhaps from your other work on geography articles, you will know where to look, and we will be able to promote it to 'B'. Kudpung ( talk) 12:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
No. All I did was move the place of death from the start of the article to the end. Looking at it again, I can see that it was a misplaced place of birth, so I have amended it in line with your findings. Deb ( talk) 12:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Good catch on the Kool Aid stuff. Glad you're keeping an eye on this Gbradt ( talk) 15:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
3 minutes to fix the {{ dn}} tag against Wigginton. I am impressed! Jan1naD ( talk • conrib) 20:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionism (2nd nomination), since you contributed to the article. Steve Dufour ( talk) 02:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Are you aware there are two newspapers:
-- role player 15:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. Just to let you know I've changed the Thames Valley Police article back to the revision where I removed the apostrophes. I cannot see any reason to use apostrophes in the initialisms I changed – they're not possessives, and I don't think the use of an apostrophe in this case aids reading. Either way, the first instance (where "Police Community Support Officer's" was originally used to denote a plural, not a possession) should definitely not be used.
If there's a reason you want to keep the apostrophes in, then please let me know. However, the rest of the article doesn't pluralise with apostrophes (see the #Organisation section, which uses "BCUs", "LPAs", and "NPTs"). Either way – apostrophes or no apostrophes – the article needs to be consistent throughout.
I hope you're OK with this – let me know you're thoughts! Have a good weekend. matt ( talk) 11:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm writing a book about Lily Pincus, teh girlfriend of Claire Löwenfeld. I try to find more informations about Claire, espacially I'm interested in the time 1925-1939, when they lived in Potsdam. Can yuo helb me?
friendly regards from Carmen Winter dichterlandschaft@t-online.de —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.232.59.236 ( talk) 11:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that in this edit you reverted my comment at Talk:Natural selection. If that was an error, please revert yourself, otherwise perhaps you would explain here. Thanks. By the way, if not an error, you should know that WP:ROLLBACK is to be used only for edits that satisfy WP:VAND. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I am in the midst of emptying Category:Former Southern Football League clubs, hence the recategorisation of Spurs. "Former" categories are discouraged, and the category was already largely empty compared to the number of former clubs in the main category. Cheers, Number 5 7 17:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Tmo142, thanks for your comments re the recent edits and reversions. I had indeed read the "discussion" under Nicknames. I am astonished by some of the individual's statements and it does look like he is not on board with the general idea of an encyclopaedia. Wikipedia is written and maintained by the people for the people and, while some of his work is appreciated, forcing his POV on others is not what the articles are for. His request for editors' credentials seems egotistic, but I can match his own credentials in terms of match attendance and singing/chanting, other than my first game was in 1967 and I never felt the need to fight battles with other fans other than in the school playground. I find his astonishing comment, "It doesn't matter what you like to think. It is bitter compared to some rivalries - only Rangers-Celtic is more dangerous," when re-adding "bitter" on 3 September to further support my feelings about his ego, as well as make me wonder what he gets up to that makes supporting Spurs so dangerous. Are there "controls" or limitations that can be applied to editors? I am not in favour of this, since it amounts to censorship, but the ongoing cycle of edits, reversions and debates needs to come to an end. BTW, I call them the Lilywhites when playing in Europe (in the traditional all-white kit). Maybe I'm archaic. And like many Spurs' supporters I'm not Jewish and I seriously do not like the other North London club. Maybe some of us are indeed "bitter"; I just don't think it's appropriate for the article. LenF54 ( talk) 16:40, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I've left two messages for you at the Dale Farm talk page now, please contribute before reverting without rationale. a_man_alone ( talk) 16:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Noticed you restoring content removed by another editor at Rafael van der Vaart: thanks for doing that. Another time, please would you also restore the dead link. As described at WP:DEADLINK, we're supposed to leave dead links in place in the hope that they can be replaced with an archive copy or alternative source, as I've now done at Mr van der Vaart's page. But if you haven't got enough time or interest to start searching for alternatives, please just tag the offending link with the {{ dead link}} template. thanks, Struway2 ( talk) 09:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry - I should read things more carefully! Mea Culpa. -- Daemonic Kangaroo ( talk) 15:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Claret Ash 13:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
In connection with our work on the William Ellis School pge, and its ongoing disagreements - may I ask if you are an Old Elysian or connected to the school yourself? I ask only because you are clearly as concerned as I to record both the School Song and, I hope, to retain the full list of alumni. (You also possess a copy of that school history!) If it is in danger of deletion, I am minded to contact the school, and see if such information could be held upon their own website to avoid its disappearance, and would be interested in your view. ExLibre ( talk) 09:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
I thought about the potential issue re: self promotion in citing Anne Fisher's article in Fortune. The question is whether it's better to stick with a three-year old reference from the Financial Times (which talks about one firm) or change to a more up-to-date reference from Fortune (which talks about another firm). Totally accept my bias since the Fortune article talks about my firm and will go with your unbiased judgment about the tradeoff between being up to date and which firm to promote. Gbradt ( talk) 22:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
1. Please don't blank redirects. 2. If you think a redirect should be deleted, send it to WP:RFD. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
PS an added irony the editor who created etc the article was eventually blocked fo creating miscevious redirects!! Tmol42 ( talk) 01:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Bolter End, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lane End ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for pointing out there were some attribution issues on those pages after my edits. Reverting was not a good solution because there were new links to references others had already cited, that will help improve both articles. Merge comments, also, belong on talk:human capital and must be moved there so the entire debate can be assessed in one place before people add new comments. The two minor copyedits to others comments which were clarifications, were removed as you seemed to object to them. What you seemed to think was editing someone else's comment was me editing my own, sorry for the confusion. The talk comments that were the source of summaries now at talk:individual capital only thank the original contributors now and do not give the impression that they wrote the copyedited text. Of course, feel free to improve those summaries as they are not attributed to anyone in particular, and hopefully both articles will get better.
I believe that all the comments that demonstrated a grasp of the material and knew the actual name of the article ( individual capital proposed in the merge) were against the merge. I will leave it up to you to decide if two years is enough time for the merge proposal or if more comment on that should be solicited before the merge tag is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.192.106.144 ( talk) 17:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing that out. I still reserve the right to revert unexplained edits though! -- role player 20:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you changed a lot of civil parish names in the list of Hertfordshire civil parishes. I was just wondering where this information came from. – anemone projectors– 09:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Are we including places in Milton Keynes now? I don't have a problem with it, where are we drawing the line? Are we including the MK estates? -- role player 21:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on St Michael, Hertfordshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. OrenBochman ( talk) 06:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
The article St Michael, Hertfordshire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
OrenBochman (
talk)
10:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Would you care to explain? this ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted some promotional edits concerning TheIOR on the Recruitment article, like I did earlier. After having taken an even closer look, it seems to me that there is an obvious conflict of interest here, and it would be recommendable that also the article Institute of Recruiters gets deleted from Wikipedia for severe lack of notability. It would be in the editor's own best interest to revert these silly actions to promote his endeavor on Wikipedia, imho. If you agree, could you be so kind to take care of it? Thanks, WeatherFug ( talk) 10:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Weatherfug, my suspicions were similarly raised by the obvious promotional nature of the edits on the Recruitment and HR articles but I had not seen anything specific which amounted to reasonable enough evidence of a conflict to put a WP:COI tag on the IOR page. If you have happy I will join with you to progress as you propose. Tmol42 ( talk) 12:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.
I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy ( talk) 22:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Recruitment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiring ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 04:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42 Thank you for the explanation as to why my Balstock entry was taken down. I now think I understand the issue. Were I to resubmit something like the following, would it be considered acceptable? I could also include a photograph of a previous years event
Balstock Music festival (with link to Balstock site) The Balstock Festival is now in its seventh year having grown from a small event held in one pub, to a three day event featuring more than 100 bands held in a number of venues across the town. It is now Hertfordshires biggest free music festival with all proceeds going to a nominated charity. In 2011, that charity was the restoration of the town's 13th century St Marys church tower.
yint — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yintsinme ( talk • contribs) 15:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of trade unions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SURGE and TSSA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited River Chess, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bullhead, Grayling and Water vole ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi ! We have
Se IW links -- 78.2.108.53 ( talk) 08:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eddleston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
– Connormah ( talk) 22:20, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Just a heads up. We don't have subpages for mainspace articles. The attempt to create a workspace, merely created a separate article with a slash in the name. Rather than create a second article, simply create a subpage for the talk page. See WP:Subpages for more information. Hope this helps. Cindy( talk to me) 21:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Career development/rewrite, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Career development/rewrite and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Career development/rewrite during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tmol42 ( talk) 21:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Talk/Career development/draft, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Talk/Career development/draft and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Talk/Career development/draft during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tmol42 ( talk) 22:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
If you're the only author of a page and you want it to be deleted, you can just tag it with {{ db-author}} and an admin will come and delete it. You don't have to send it to MfD. Hut 8.5 22:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hawridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Please can you write/edit or modify Matt Bakers page to include his involvement in the 2012 Children in need campaign or find this in good will and let it be stated that you are objecting however not contributing to the edit. TicktonMN ( talk) 18:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White British, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lowland Scots ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weedon, Buckinghamshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buckingham Park ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Good work on this, I hadn't spotted that the new parish had yet formally come into existence, so you get first shot at setting it up. You've been around here long enough to do so with confidence, but let me know if you need any tips. Walton, Milton Keynes is a good model. Don't forget to add the new parish name|link to template:Milton Keynes parishes. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 12:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you managed to hack your way through the ONS data to get the 2011 population for some parishes around MK, but we don't have a composite figure for MK itself (especially since I removed the figure with the silly source). Can you do that? Or tell me how you got the parish data? Have they still got Urban Area figures? -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 13:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black British, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunderland, Salford and Sefton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tmol42. I was wondering why you reverted my comment on Talk:Objections to evolution? Thanks! Scientific29 ( talk) 09:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrows ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hemel Hempstead, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Genesis and Quintessence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Fitzjohn's Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
King
Jakob
C2
22:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fitzjohn's Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitzjohn's Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King Jakob C2 17:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I went to add merge tags to Weedon Hill and Berryfields, but notice that you have added a speedy delete tag to Buckingham Park, Buckinghamshire to facilitate a move of Weedon Hill. Is your plan to then merge the Berryfields content in with that article? - Scribble Monkey ( talk) 17:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
D6equj5 ( talk) 19:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Tmol42 - you repeatedly revert my edits - you are vandalising my corrections to the Bradford Factor entry - please halt immediately. Thank you D
Hi Tmol42. Just to make you aware I have put a page move request up on the United Kingdom labour law talk page so that we can get a consensus and action it at the same time. Feel free to add your opinion (again!) regarding this. Thanks, iComputer SaysNo 08:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
I'll have to assume your restoration of spammed, promotional links was a mistake. If I'm wrong, do start a discussion on the talk page explaining how they could be appropriate external links. -- Ronz ( talk) 20:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tmol42, could you please voice your support for moving the page back to the proper name, at Talk:United Kingdom employment law? Wik idea 15:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit? The article itself confirms ( with a reliable source) that he left Corinthians for Totterham. Victão Lopes I hear you... 14:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Foreign-born population of the United Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to White British may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 20:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:The Rambling Man, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ...William 19:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Why did you not feel it necessary to give a reason for reverting my edit? Wicks Steve ( talk) 03:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
So only American towns and cities are permitted to use flags on settlement articles?
Menlo Park, California,
Chicago,
Boston...
WP:INFOBOXFLAG
Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes...
Wicks Steve (
talk)
06:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I suggest you stop being so arrogant and learn to accept when you are wrong. Wicks Steve ( talk) 01:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The passage I quoted makes no mention of the "infobox UK place template" being an exception to the rule. Wicks Steve ( talk) 04:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I attempted to discuss the matter on the other editor's talk page and at BLPN. He has not responded meaningfully to either. Giant Snowman 13:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
@ Tmol42: next time you have a message for me, please address it to my talk page and not another, so that I can be better acquainted with it. -- Ebdòmero ( talk) 17:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thank you for your kind words. -- evrik ( talk) 16:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grammar schools debate may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyond 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LSE ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Buckinghamshire hundreds 2 Desborough.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paulinho (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
When, in this edit to White British you added the "Census England" ref, it pointed at a table for Wales. Do you know what the correct reference for England is? -- David Biddulph ( talk) 00:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the recent edits to figures by IPs at that article - both in the infobox and in the opening text? They don't seem to me to add up, but I'm having some difficulty in finding the right tables at the ONS site to try and make the corrections. I haven't reverted the recent changes because I'm simply not sure what the correct figures are! Any help gratefully received. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 17:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.
It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I saw the great work that you had done with Demographics_of_England in the organisation of its tables and I was wondering whether they might be able to be extended to give information on Population density.
What I would do is then add a note to say:
Population density based on a calculated 130,427 km² area of the United Kingdom.
But my problem is that I don't have the technical skill to do this my self. Its just an idea but I think an adaptation like this would make the information even more meaningful.
Regards, Gregkaye ( talk) 12:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matt Baker (presenter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ellie Harrison ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. players may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of poor law unions in England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chiltern Hills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Well. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bicester may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Midshires Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Midshires Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midshires Way, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Winslow, Sawley and Duffield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--
The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Please explain how what I wrote is less neutral than what was there before. – Smyth\ talk 20:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Please respond. – Smyth\ talk 12:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on
our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--
The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of trade unions in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For your selfless help with the Edward Bishop article. Schwede 66 03:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hello Tmol, thank you for your advice the other day. I actually work in the field of computer science and I have tried to look at the issue of data on the Education section of the British Nigerian page as objectively as possible. I assure you I have no political agenda, except for ensuring that the mostly favorable data on the academic achievements of British Nigerian children are represented fully on the British Nigerian page.
While I feel it is unfair to comment on other users directly, it is clear to me that others do not want fair and balanced reporting of data on specific groups for personal reasons (I assure you I am not one of them). The whole point of Wikipedia is to provide an accurate resource for information free of personal bias and I fail to see how using information from the IPPR report for example doesn't do that.
It isn't my idea of a fun evening, writing numerous posts online to ensure that the achievements of another ethnic group are accurately portrayed. But when I see users editing information based on their own personal bias, then I feel compelled to act. I agree that the Education section is in need of improvement along with the majority of the page, but I have been stymied in my efforts to correct it and provide more information.
Also one must never be afraid to report the facts and you as a fellow man of science know that rationality must never be second to dogma or political opinion.
Thanks for your time
Nograviti ( talk) Nograviti ( talk) 10:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, had a feeling that was wrong, but didn't understand why it linked to what was the plantation in Virginia article in the first place. Thanks for fixing. Famartin ( talk) 21:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I see you've contributed to a discussion regarding education statistics at Talk:British Nigerian. Would you be interested in taking a look at a similar one at Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom? Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. I'm concerned about developments at this article. A couple of editors with a very close relationship now seem to be collaborating to remove perfectly well sourced material from the article. As a longstanding contributor, do you want to take a look? Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
British Bangladeshi, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. Thanks for noticing my erroneous edit on the Hugo Lloris page. I do not know how that happened. I've since done another edit that's correct. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadicalRedRaccoon ( talk • contribs) 10:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Tmol42,
The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.
You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.
More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.
Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I worked on creating a section to add to the Job Interview Wiki page for a class project. The section I wrote was on Interview Anxiety. I've submitted several times and never received word back why the content was rejected. I asked a friend to try submitting, and this person received word that the article was written as "advice to the reader" and that the "you" "we" and "advice" content needed to be removed. I removed the "advice-like" content, but the section was removed once again. Is there any way I can get this posted? Or is this content just not applicable to this page? Is there something else I am doing incorrectly? Thank you. Lrl20092015 ( talk) 13:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you taking the time to reply to my question. I apologize for my ignorance related to the etiquette of posting to Wikipedia and for conversing with editors; I certainly did not intentionally mean to offend anyone. Thank you for revising and finding space for this subject. Lrl20092015 ( talk) 19:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. I saw that you reverted an edit to Ethnic groups in London. I almost made the same revert myself, assuming it was to do with the rounding, but when I checked the source, it looks like the IP was actually correcting it correctly - if that makes sense! Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi I'm trying to update & refresh the entry to reflect that The Work Foundation has appointed a new Director this month. There are also a number of factual inaccuracies about the work it does and the history of its insolvency. You might regard these as controversial, I just regard them as demonstrably inaccurate. It should be borne in mind that Will Hutton stepped down from the CEO role in 2008 yet the entry (in my view) focuses largely on him and his role. I'd appreciate guidance about how to make these changes in an objective way. I certainly don't want to re-write history (I'm happy, for example, to keep in references to the insolvency) but I would say that the explanation for the insolvency is unbalanced, contains factual inaccuracies and could be regarded as having an 'agenda' against Mr Hutton by implying that the 'decline' of the organisation was wholly attributable to him. My overall aim is to bring the entry up to date and to emphasise The Work Foundation's current research interests, priorities and Director. I am still employed by The Work Foundation and was a Director during the acquisition. Happy to discuss how we resolve this. SteveBevan ( talk) 15:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)SteveBevan
SteveBevan ( talk) 10:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)SteveBeva
Are you still actively involved in the Project? I'm looking to improve on the articles in relation to Aylesbury and surrounding areas. Cheers. Uamaol ( talk) 21:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42 . As a former contributor to the Somalis in the United Kingdom article, I wanted to let you know about a discussion I started about getting the article to GA status, following the issuing of a topic ban to Middayexpress for POV editing of this and other articles. Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. As someone who has shown some interest in articles about immigration to the UK, I wondered if you might like to comment on the FAC discussion for Gateway Protection Programme? A previous discussion was archived due to a lack of participation, and I am keen to avoid the same happening again. Any thoughts you have on the article would be much appreciated. Cordless Larry ( talk) 12:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Chesham Town Crest 01.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 22:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 23:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by
The Interior,
Ocaasi,
UY Scuti,
Sadads, and
Nikkimaria
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:H&C School Logo copy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi,
Samwalton9,
UY Scuti, and
Sadads
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by
Nikkimaria,
Sadads and
UY Scuti
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs),
Samwalton9 (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs),
Samwalton9 (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017
Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Tmol42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Tmol42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Created Archive page for User talk: Tmol42
It doesn't look like you meant to reply to me here: [1], so would you mind changing the indenting or where you inserted the comment, or could I do it for you, otherwise it may confuse. thanks. John Hayes talk 11:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
The edit I made in Talk:Tottenham Hotspur F.C., was an edit of my previous post where I hadn't signed in and did not have my user name attributed to it. Surely, I am able to correct my own contributions? Is that within the Wikipedia rules? ( Atouraya ( talk) 01:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC))
Tmol42 ( talk) 09:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Asking someone who clearly shares your viewpoint on a matter can be considered canvassing. If you have sent out a notice on an issue you need to at least record this fact somewhere such as in actual discussion page for the topic in question.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Canvassing for more information.
Thanks -- Shakehandsman ( talk) 22:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
A title of UserTmol42/Sandbox1 was a namespace violation so something had to be done. On a brief inspection, it seemed eminently ready to become an article so I have moved it to railway time. In this case I think capitalisation may be appropriate: Railway Time. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 20:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
No need for you to be embarrassed - just blame it on me! The material covered by your article seems perfectly correct for the railway time title. There was little justification for redirecting to Madras time. I have seem the feeling expressed that articles should be moved into the article namespace as soon as possible because Wikipedia is collaborative. If you insist on continuing to sandbox it, then you can move it back to User:Tmol42/Sandbox1 yourself. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 21:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for not taking any further action because I do believe someone else, who has been vandalising Wikipedia, has the same IP address as me or something. However, the edit to the boat race was mad by me and i don't see why it is viewed as vandalism; all i did was change the format of the latest result to be consistent with that of previous results (i.e. Oxford wins are highlighted in dark blue) -- 212.120.248.142 ( talk) 14:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
I see now what I did. Let me assure you it was an accident and not vandalism. -- 212.120.248.142 ( talk) 17:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. You might want to check the diff of Talk:Cholesbury, where you will find I didn't rate the article, contrary to your rather brisk claims ( WP:AGF?). I'm not going to get involved in any length of conversation with you, but you need to make sure that what you're accusing someone of is what they actually done. Also, please don't mess up my talk page by placing your note at a level 3 header, just use the [+] button to add a new comment, have the courtesy to leave a summary with your edit, and use the preview button to avoid making repeated edits. Severo T C 22:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid I know nothing about article assessment. I would bring this up at the project's talk page. -- Roleplayer ( talk) 23:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey Tmol42, I've reverted the most recent IP edit. As far as I'm concerned, there's no verifiable evidence provided in that link and we shouldn't have to pay to see the links. It's tough because there's potential for the source to be reliable, for sure, but it can't be verified without payment which, in my opinion, makes it fail verifiability. Indeed, if this is significant then there should be a suitable, free alternative to verify the claim. All the best. The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you took part in the recent FLRC for List of Arsenal F.C. players and thought you might be interested in participating in a new discussion. The FLRC was closed as no consensus and it is clear the the issue of incompleteness in longer FLs is not over, so a discussion page has been started here. Please feel free to comment. -- Scorpion 0422 21:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
For the stats on the main Spurs page, Yeah I do feel that they would be better on the season page, since they are for the 2007-08 season, and it would be good to have all that information on the same place...about the commentary, because this is the first 'live' season paage and it was made more than half way through, I think people just continued listing the news on the main page out of habit so the duplication happen, I think when next season comes around and the season page is there from the start, I think the separation between detail and brief will come about naturally and if not, then it can talked about at the beginning of next season...I don't think the 2008-09 page can made now, because although the big news of modric signing it would still be a page of empty headings right now you know but not long after the season ends it could take shape...so about immediate matter, Yeah I agree that the stats should be on the season page, thanks, Prem4eva ( talk) 17:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you removed my polyphosphate section addition on the abiogenesis page. Why? Is it improper to link to a book so that people can read the actual model in detail? Should I have put a reference to the book with no link (title, year, etc)? Others seem to link to web pages of books and papers. What might I do to make it acceptable (in your opinion)? The abiogenesis page is in pretty sorry shape in my opinion. Another paragraph on polyphosphate and its possible role in abiogenesis seems more than justified.
Also, what is your expertise in polyphosphate and abiogenesis? Polyp2 ( talk) 04:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Why did you revert my edit to the talk page? This was hardly a constructive contribution. SteveO ( talk) 16:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edition? I've wroten it, because this is true - if you want, I can search sources, which will be accepct with my commentary. Alden or talk with Alden 22:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Could you please elaborate why you deleted the information provided by me? It was cited by all major Polish portals, including Wirtualna Polska, which is among top information portals of the country, I can provide tens of sources for it. Do not do it next time, as this is relevant and properly cited info. Tymek ( talk) 17:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Robbie Keane will be a Liverpool player by tuesday boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.210.30 ( talk) 20:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I have recieved a message saying that my contibitutions were vandalism, when I was adding players, their countries and statistics, as the page was maent to be expanded. I would like to know how this contributes as vadalism.
Thanks
Obiwanskywalker
Hi take a look at your edit to List of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. players, it left the page in a bit of a mess to be frank and you added a small amount of incorrect information. I have tied it a bit but it still needs a little more mmaintenance. As you had not corrected it was reverted and a polite message as per WP guidelines was added suggesting you take care with your edits and to use the sandbox if you need to test your edits first. Fine if it was a mistake on your behalf, and we all make errors from time to time, but the message was still appropriate, good luck Tmol42 ( talk) 12:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
OK thanks, I will try to be a bit more tidy next time. I admit that I did make a mistake or two, and because of that I am sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obiwanskywalker ( talk • contribs) 10:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
What is the template for the Ivory Coast, I can not seem to find it, if you respond then I will be able to tidy up the list of tottenham hotspur players page.
Obiwanskywalker ( talk) 21:00, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Try using
Ivory Coast I think it should work but you need to check the piping ( | ) carefully as it gets lost with the brackets ( {{ ) Also you need to crt the spelling of DZ, good luck
Tmol42 (
talk)
21:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
OK thanks, I have done that now, but have encountered another problem: flag of morroco. what link shouold I use? I have tried:{{flagcountry|Morroco}} and {{flagcountry|Kingdom of Morroco}} but neither of those seem to work.
-- Obiwanskywalker ( talk) 12:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Cheers for all of you help, I have now finished editing that page. The only link that does not work is the one for the brazillian left back gilberto. It does not seem to like the link, I do not whether this is because a page does not exist or if I am just spelling his name wrong. Get back to me if possible about this.
--
Obiwanskywalker (
talk)
15:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, I hadn't relised what the criteria for the notable players was, thanks for telling me.
-- Obiwanskywalker ( talk) 13:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Does Luca Modric count as a notable player? As he has agreed to play for the club and has played for Croatio after this agreement. I am not sure whether becuase of this he would be a notable player, or whether he would have to have played for us/taken part in training at WHL for him to count as a notable player
--
Obiwanskywalker (
talk)
10:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand how my edit was non-neutral.
my edit; "however, the argument is not just that the flagellum is complex! The bacterial flagellum, says Behe, could not work without about 40 protein components all organized in the right way and only about 10 of the 40 components can be explained by co-option, but the other 30 are brand new. [1] Also, the very process of assembly in the right sequence requires other regulatory machines, so is in itself irreducibly complex."
Please also explain how it can be considered vandalism.
66.74.230.117 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
"I could also comment on the nature and content of your edits but will leave it there."
No, go ahead. I gave a reference, I didn't go on a rampage, I didn't keep a certain point of view. I just added information that needed to be there to inform people what the argument was really about, that it's so complex that there couldn't have been co-option in acquiring the other 30 components. I'm also sorry for inserting the hidden comments, it wont happen again. 66.74.230.117 ( talk) 14:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Maybe I did over-react a bit, but I still feel that the full UK-settlement template is completely OTT for an urban CP. I think we need a different template. I'll take it to the UK Geography Project. Meanwhile, you could reinstate the infoboxes but I suggest that you look hard at which elements it is sensible to populate. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 16:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
There must be a problem with the system because the first 6 or eight times I checked on that user, it showed no contributions and no deleted contributions. It was only after Hut blocked him/her that the edits appeared. Thanks for your contributions. Toddst1 ( talk) 20:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot ( talk) 19:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you reverted one of my comments on the reference desk, without making any note of why you had done so. Why was this? 79.66.56.21 ( talk) 21:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I have replied at Talk:List of civil parishes in Buckinghamshire. Nice to know someone's taking note! Skinsmoke ( talk) 12:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
For some reason it's pretty hard to get people to actually comment, so since you reverted my edit, I invite you to voice your opinion at Template talk:Current sport#Adding & applying guidelines. :) -- Conti| ✉ 16:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I work in the education service in Bucks. Have I missed something? I'm certain the 12+ system is still in place. -- role player 12:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
OK, a break. I have replied you: Let's talk about that, please, on my page ( Category Generation) Franta Oashi ( talk) 23:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. The move was just to make the title consistent with the lead paragraph. Had the lead referred to him as "J.E.S. Lawrence" I would have moved it to that title (adding a space between the "S" and "Lawrence"). The article still needs some work though. If I have time I will take another look at it in a day or so. – ukexpat ( talk) 18:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, but I think you'll find it's User:RM-Taylor who changed the squad numbers. Mattythewhite ( talk) 20:49, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tmol52. I noticed that you mentioned Twitter was not allowed due to WP:V but I would direct you to WP:SELFPUB as I would imagine that Jozy is an authority as to where he will be playing. Also, you seemed to miss the other ESPNSoccernet.com link mentioned in the edit. http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=665365&cc=5901 Garyhampson ( talk) 21:54, 05 Aug 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Just to say sorry for this edit. I've no idea how I managed to revert your addition - all I was trying to do was remove the flag. Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Are you saying that Cholesbury smock mill and Hawridge mill are one and the same? Mjroots ( talk) 17:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Bongo matic 14:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
I'll look around for sources, though I can't promise to devote myself to it. :) It looks like a nice article so far. SlimVirgin talk| contribs 17:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Claire Loewenfeld, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claire Loewenfeld. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongo matic 04:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thank you, that's very kind of you! I was thinking about you today, missing all the excitement. :) But it's all worked out pretty well. I'm going to be interested to see how much more we can find out about her. I suspect quite a lot actually; it's almost certainly just a question of finding the right books. Anyway, well done for all your research, and for starting the article in the first place. :) SlimVirgin talk| contribs 01:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
You missed the insertion of massive penises when rolling back vandalism on Human resources. Next time look more closely for vandalism covering vandalism. Fifelfoo ( talk) 10:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Buckinghamshire was part of Wessex in the Heptarchy. - Yorkshirian ( talk) 17:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I hadn't realised how much effort the guy (I assume it's a guy) had put into his fruitless and misguided task until I checked the IP history - seems he's been using more than one, presumably it changes irregularly, or perhaps he has access to more than one PC (maybe at a school or college? Seems it's impossible to convince him that the hills to the east of Streatley are the Berkshire Downs - or perhaps he's just being bloody minded and enjoying his little "joke"? There's already a history of warnings on his talk page, so an IP ban will have to follow if he persists. I could maybe check out the history of his other IPs also - they might well show similar activity on other pages and reveal a few more "sock puppet" addresses. I've checked out a few users that way, and uncovered a "spider's web" of SP userids or IP addresses. Just as well to make a complete job of it. I'll get on it tonight. Yours in frustration Ramble24 ( talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 20:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC).
Update - I've reported this user for vandalism - we'll see an IP block soon maybe? Rambler24 ( talk) 14:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42, I just got your message about the Cumulative Goal Difference chart - not sure why but it only just arrived - it might be because I am using WP Beta on several different computers in various places. So yes - move the chart to where you think best, In general they are used to give an overview of managerial performance, so the managers page was where I put it, but club stats makes sense too... or both maybe. Let me know what you want in way of explanation or re-design. -- Payo ( talk) 22:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
TMol42 - I resisted the temptation to put my currently available books back on the Onboarding page, given the discussions about deleting the whole article and my potential conflict of interest. Instead, I'm hoping you'll put them back. The argument is that they credibly contribute to knowledge. 1) They help people in new ways. "The New Leader's 100-Day Action Plan" helps leaders moving into new positions. "Onboarding" helps people hiring people to move into new positions. 2) Both were published by John Wiley and Sons, the world's largest business publisher. 3) I think your point about "The Total Onboarding Program" is right since it doesn't come out until next summer. It's listing should be delayed. Gbradt ( talk) 12:00, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
See this edit, we only block if they edit after a final warning. If you have questions leave a note on my talk page. Jeepday ( talk) 13:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I note your comment on the talk page of this article to the effect that my comment:
I am replying to you at the first opportunity, as I have been absent for a few days. What I have written here may seem rude, but in fact, I am seeking to comprehend why an editor would be so persisten in removing a scientific term in favour of a non-scientific term which has a primary meaning other than that intended. It seems clear that there is an agenda here, yet the editor denies this. The whole first paragraph contains inappropriate stuff, but the single word "realised" is an unacceptable way to described a "conclusion" drawn by a scientist after scientific study.
You remark that my point is well argued. The reason is that it comes from a sound base. However, this makes no impression upon the person that I referred to as suffering from either "lack of understanding" or "bloodymindedness". May I ask how you suggest getting this error corrected, when the editor returns the erroneous word every time it is changed?
Please put my use of the above terms down as stemming from my total "lack of understanding" of such behaviour in the face of commonsense and reason, and utter frustration caused by a person who is so persistent at maintaining what is wrong, while denying having an agenda for doing it.
Amandajm ( talk) 10:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Tmol42 why did you delete my post on the olympics 2012 about the song being sung that was true it wasnt fake —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubair171 ( talk • contribs) 15:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubair171 ( talk • contribs) 08:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Even when you think it, and I'm not disagreeing with you, it never helps the situation to say it. Tim Vickers ( talk) 19:00, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
They are two different film series and having them on the same page is causing confusion. There is no need for discussion or "concensus". Please do not start edit warring. If you have a realistic reason for keeping the articles together, please state it at Talk:Kurt Wallander#Moves?. Bradley0110 ( talk) 18:45, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
I opened the discussion on this move. The discussion is still open, as far as I'm concerned; if you have any comments I'd like to hear them. Swanny18 ( talk) 19:12, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
PS I've reverted under BRD, for now. Swanny18 ( talk) 19:16, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem. Let me (or ANI) know if you see him/her continuing this trick under another account name. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 15:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
RE the tottenham hotspur page. they are the last english team to score 100 goals in a season [111] are they the only? the first or last or only team in england to win the 2nd and 1st division titles back to back. i think first. jimmy greaves was the first player to score 100 goals, if that was with spurs that should probably be mentioned. i think that's it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.10.45 ( talk) 19:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
yeah thanks. villa have scored the most, 128 or something and sunderland were the first. i'll check the tables..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.10.45 ( talk) 00:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC) everton did it in 1932. i might not add anything i mentioned but if you want to do. hey i can't edit the spurs page without an account. someone should add that they are the *last* team to score over 100 goals and the *last* team to win back to back 2nd and 1st division titles, finishing runners up the next year [as the table on that page shows]. also when that's mentioned mention that their manager invented the push and run to win those titles. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.10.45 ( talk) 00:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with you comprehensively. I have reverted your reversion and suggest that you take it to the aticle's talk page rather than engage in a reversion of reversions, etc.
A list must be referenced whether the references are in the article of the listed entity or not. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 22:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandal's edit to my userpage. Out of interest, do you have any idea what his gibberish actually meant? – Pee Jay 16:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
With reference to your point on the Onboarding talk page. After the discussion you referred to, and after a discussion about whether or not to delete the article in its entirety, it was decided to keep it and Mandesford drafted an article that lays out the key points in a coherent and understandable fashion.
I'm suggesting we should keep the article encyclopedic and keep out things that promote specific businesses like the direct links to Kaiser and Associates someone has put in their references to a book that has not yet even been published. Are you suggesting that "fairs fair" means we should do something different? I would hope not. A couple of years ago, this article was a hodge-podge of paragraphs promoting a range of onboarding services.
I've sworn off touching this article directly and have asked my various colleagues not to edit it directly to avoid any appearance of conflicts of interest. Having co-authored three books and innumerable articles on the subject and spending all my time thinking about onboarding in conjunction with our firm, PrimeGenesis, I have a long-standing deep interest in onboarding and continue to create new knowledge. (My latest piece is on "Leading through a Crisis - The New Leader's 100-Hour Action Plan"). I plan to continue to monitor the article and make suggestions in its talk page under my own name. I think I'm being open, straightforward and contributing to the common good - with nothing but good faith. Do you have suggestions for better ways for me to be involved? Gbradt ( talk) 10:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Are external links to company websites, like the one to Kaiser and Associates, OK now? Gbradt ( talk) 09:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have made a start at reactivating WikiProject Buckinghamshire after a short break. I am in the process of working on the front page at User:Roleplayer/Sandbox to make it more attractive and easier to navigate. My aim is to make the project a reference point for editors creating or working on Buckinghamshire-related articles.
A couple of days ago I moved anyone who hadn't edited the project in a while from the current members list to an inactive members list, and this includes you. If you are still interested in the project, or are still regularly updating Buckinghamshire articles then please move your name back to the current list (remembering to keep entries in alphabetic order). If you are no longer interested in this project, then you needn't do anything further.
Cheers!
-- role player 14:29, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
You seem to have accidentally created it in the wrong namespace. I moved it to your userspace. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 18:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42/Archive. Civil parishes in England, an article you have contributed to, has been reassessed to C class from Start class. Apparently many people watch and/or visit this page as an alternative to the broader Civil parishes article. I've quickly scanned it for needing a possible copy edit, but it already looks reasonably good to me. However, I did feel it just needs a little attention such as adding more inline refs. It's not tagged or anything, but if you can help ut with a source or two, it would be much appreciated. Perhaps from your other work on geography articles, you will know where to look, and we will be able to promote it to 'B'. Kudpung ( talk) 12:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
No. All I did was move the place of death from the start of the article to the end. Looking at it again, I can see that it was a misplaced place of birth, so I have amended it in line with your findings. Deb ( talk) 12:15, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Good catch on the Kool Aid stuff. Glad you're keeping an eye on this Gbradt ( talk) 15:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
3 minutes to fix the {{ dn}} tag against Wigginton. I am impressed! Jan1naD ( talk • conrib) 20:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionism (2nd nomination), since you contributed to the article. Steve Dufour ( talk) 02:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Are you aware there are two newspapers:
-- role player 15:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. Just to let you know I've changed the Thames Valley Police article back to the revision where I removed the apostrophes. I cannot see any reason to use apostrophes in the initialisms I changed – they're not possessives, and I don't think the use of an apostrophe in this case aids reading. Either way, the first instance (where "Police Community Support Officer's" was originally used to denote a plural, not a possession) should definitely not be used.
If there's a reason you want to keep the apostrophes in, then please let me know. However, the rest of the article doesn't pluralise with apostrophes (see the #Organisation section, which uses "BCUs", "LPAs", and "NPTs"). Either way – apostrophes or no apostrophes – the article needs to be consistent throughout.
I hope you're OK with this – let me know you're thoughts! Have a good weekend. matt ( talk) 11:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm writing a book about Lily Pincus, teh girlfriend of Claire Löwenfeld. I try to find more informations about Claire, espacially I'm interested in the time 1925-1939, when they lived in Potsdam. Can yuo helb me?
friendly regards from Carmen Winter dichterlandschaft@t-online.de —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.232.59.236 ( talk) 11:32, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
I noticed that in this edit you reverted my comment at Talk:Natural selection. If that was an error, please revert yourself, otherwise perhaps you would explain here. Thanks. By the way, if not an error, you should know that WP:ROLLBACK is to be used only for edits that satisfy WP:VAND. Johnuniq ( talk) 09:45, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I am in the midst of emptying Category:Former Southern Football League clubs, hence the recategorisation of Spurs. "Former" categories are discouraged, and the category was already largely empty compared to the number of former clubs in the main category. Cheers, Number 5 7 17:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Tmo142, thanks for your comments re the recent edits and reversions. I had indeed read the "discussion" under Nicknames. I am astonished by some of the individual's statements and it does look like he is not on board with the general idea of an encyclopaedia. Wikipedia is written and maintained by the people for the people and, while some of his work is appreciated, forcing his POV on others is not what the articles are for. His request for editors' credentials seems egotistic, but I can match his own credentials in terms of match attendance and singing/chanting, other than my first game was in 1967 and I never felt the need to fight battles with other fans other than in the school playground. I find his astonishing comment, "It doesn't matter what you like to think. It is bitter compared to some rivalries - only Rangers-Celtic is more dangerous," when re-adding "bitter" on 3 September to further support my feelings about his ego, as well as make me wonder what he gets up to that makes supporting Spurs so dangerous. Are there "controls" or limitations that can be applied to editors? I am not in favour of this, since it amounts to censorship, but the ongoing cycle of edits, reversions and debates needs to come to an end. BTW, I call them the Lilywhites when playing in Europe (in the traditional all-white kit). Maybe I'm archaic. And like many Spurs' supporters I'm not Jewish and I seriously do not like the other North London club. Maybe some of us are indeed "bitter"; I just don't think it's appropriate for the article. LenF54 ( talk) 16:40, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I've left two messages for you at the Dale Farm talk page now, please contribute before reverting without rationale. a_man_alone ( talk) 16:32, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Noticed you restoring content removed by another editor at Rafael van der Vaart: thanks for doing that. Another time, please would you also restore the dead link. As described at WP:DEADLINK, we're supposed to leave dead links in place in the hope that they can be replaced with an archive copy or alternative source, as I've now done at Mr van der Vaart's page. But if you haven't got enough time or interest to start searching for alternatives, please just tag the offending link with the {{ dead link}} template. thanks, Struway2 ( talk) 09:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Sorry - I should read things more carefully! Mea Culpa. -- Daemonic Kangaroo ( talk) 15:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Claret Ash 13:32, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
In connection with our work on the William Ellis School pge, and its ongoing disagreements - may I ask if you are an Old Elysian or connected to the school yourself? I ask only because you are clearly as concerned as I to record both the School Song and, I hope, to retain the full list of alumni. (You also possess a copy of that school history!) If it is in danger of deletion, I am minded to contact the school, and see if such information could be held upon their own website to avoid its disappearance, and would be interested in your view. ExLibre ( talk) 09:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
I thought about the potential issue re: self promotion in citing Anne Fisher's article in Fortune. The question is whether it's better to stick with a three-year old reference from the Financial Times (which talks about one firm) or change to a more up-to-date reference from Fortune (which talks about another firm). Totally accept my bias since the Fortune article talks about my firm and will go with your unbiased judgment about the tradeoff between being up to date and which firm to promote. Gbradt ( talk) 22:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
1. Please don't blank redirects. 2. If you think a redirect should be deleted, send it to WP:RFD. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 00:22, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
PS an added irony the editor who created etc the article was eventually blocked fo creating miscevious redirects!! Tmol42 ( talk) 01:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Bolter End, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lane End ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for pointing out there were some attribution issues on those pages after my edits. Reverting was not a good solution because there were new links to references others had already cited, that will help improve both articles. Merge comments, also, belong on talk:human capital and must be moved there so the entire debate can be assessed in one place before people add new comments. The two minor copyedits to others comments which were clarifications, were removed as you seemed to object to them. What you seemed to think was editing someone else's comment was me editing my own, sorry for the confusion. The talk comments that were the source of summaries now at talk:individual capital only thank the original contributors now and do not give the impression that they wrote the copyedited text. Of course, feel free to improve those summaries as they are not attributed to anyone in particular, and hopefully both articles will get better.
I believe that all the comments that demonstrated a grasp of the material and knew the actual name of the article ( individual capital proposed in the merge) were against the merge. I will leave it up to you to decide if two years is enough time for the merge proposal or if more comment on that should be solicited before the merge tag is removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.192.106.144 ( talk) 17:17, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing that out. I still reserve the right to revert unexplained edits though! -- role player 20:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you changed a lot of civil parish names in the list of Hertfordshire civil parishes. I was just wondering where this information came from. – anemone projectors– 09:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Are we including places in Milton Keynes now? I don't have a problem with it, where are we drawing the line? Are we including the MK estates? -- role player 21:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on St Michael, Hertfordshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. OrenBochman ( talk) 06:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
The article St Michael, Hertfordshire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
OrenBochman (
talk)
10:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Would you care to explain? this ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted some promotional edits concerning TheIOR on the Recruitment article, like I did earlier. After having taken an even closer look, it seems to me that there is an obvious conflict of interest here, and it would be recommendable that also the article Institute of Recruiters gets deleted from Wikipedia for severe lack of notability. It would be in the editor's own best interest to revert these silly actions to promote his endeavor on Wikipedia, imho. If you agree, could you be so kind to take care of it? Thanks, WeatherFug ( talk) 10:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Weatherfug, my suspicions were similarly raised by the obvious promotional nature of the edits on the Recruitment and HR articles but I had not seen anything specific which amounted to reasonable enough evidence of a conflict to put a WP:COI tag on the IOR page. If you have happy I will join with you to progress as you propose. Tmol42 ( talk) 12:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
You are invited to the first ever Reading Wiki Meetup which will take place at Copa, 76-78 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3BJ on Sunday 23 September 2012 from 1.00 pm.
I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Berkshire related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy ( talk) 22:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Recruitment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiring ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 04:53, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42 Thank you for the explanation as to why my Balstock entry was taken down. I now think I understand the issue. Were I to resubmit something like the following, would it be considered acceptable? I could also include a photograph of a previous years event
Balstock Music festival (with link to Balstock site) The Balstock Festival is now in its seventh year having grown from a small event held in one pub, to a three day event featuring more than 100 bands held in a number of venues across the town. It is now Hertfordshires biggest free music festival with all proceeds going to a nominated charity. In 2011, that charity was the restoration of the town's 13th century St Marys church tower.
yint — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yintsinme ( talk • contribs) 15:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of trade unions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SURGE and TSSA ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:36, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited River Chess, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bullhead, Grayling and Water vole ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi ! We have
Se IW links -- 78.2.108.53 ( talk) 08:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eddleston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
– Connormah ( talk) 22:20, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Just a heads up. We don't have subpages for mainspace articles. The attempt to create a workspace, merely created a separate article with a slash in the name. Rather than create a second article, simply create a subpage for the talk page. See WP:Subpages for more information. Hope this helps. Cindy( talk to me) 21:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Career development/rewrite, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Career development/rewrite and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Career development/rewrite during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tmol42 ( talk) 21:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Talk/Career development/draft, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Talk/Career development/draft and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Talk/Career development/draft during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tmol42 ( talk) 22:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
If you're the only author of a page and you want it to be deleted, you can just tag it with {{ db-author}} and an admin will come and delete it. You don't have to send it to MfD. Hut 8.5 22:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hawridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Please can you write/edit or modify Matt Bakers page to include his involvement in the 2012 Children in need campaign or find this in good will and let it be stated that you are objecting however not contributing to the edit. TicktonMN ( talk) 18:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White British, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lowland Scots ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Weedon, Buckinghamshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buckingham Park ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 00:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Good work on this, I hadn't spotted that the new parish had yet formally come into existence, so you get first shot at setting it up. You've been around here long enough to do so with confidence, but let me know if you need any tips. Walton, Milton Keynes is a good model. Don't forget to add the new parish name|link to template:Milton Keynes parishes. -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 12:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you managed to hack your way through the ONS data to get the 2011 population for some parishes around MK, but we don't have a composite figure for MK itself (especially since I removed the figure with the silly source). Can you do that? Or tell me how you got the parish data? Have they still got Urban Area figures? -- John Maynard Friedman ( talk) 13:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black British, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunderland, Salford and Sefton ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tmol42. I was wondering why you reverted my comment on Talk:Objections to evolution? Thanks! Scientific29 ( talk) 09:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrows ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 17:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hemel Hempstead, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Genesis and Quintessence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Fitzjohn's Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
King
Jakob
C2
22:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fitzjohn's Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitzjohn's Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King Jakob C2 17:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I went to add merge tags to Weedon Hill and Berryfields, but notice that you have added a speedy delete tag to Buckingham Park, Buckinghamshire to facilitate a move of Weedon Hill. Is your plan to then merge the Berryfields content in with that article? - Scribble Monkey ( talk) 17:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
D6equj5 ( talk) 19:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Tmol42 - you repeatedly revert my edits - you are vandalising my corrections to the Bradford Factor entry - please halt immediately. Thank you D
Hi Tmol42. Just to make you aware I have put a page move request up on the United Kingdom labour law talk page so that we can get a consensus and action it at the same time. Feel free to add your opinion (again!) regarding this. Thanks, iComputer SaysNo 08:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
I'll have to assume your restoration of spammed, promotional links was a mistake. If I'm wrong, do start a discussion on the talk page explaining how they could be appropriate external links. -- Ronz ( talk) 20:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Tmol42, could you please voice your support for moving the page back to the proper name, at Talk:United Kingdom employment law? Wik idea 15:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit? The article itself confirms ( with a reliable source) that he left Corinthians for Totterham. Victão Lopes I hear you... 14:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Foreign-born population of the United Kingdom may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to White British may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 14:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 20:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:The Rambling Man, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ...William 19:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Why did you not feel it necessary to give a reason for reverting my edit? Wicks Steve ( talk) 03:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
So only American towns and cities are permitted to use flags on settlement articles?
Menlo Park, California,
Chicago,
Boston...
WP:INFOBOXFLAG
Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes...
Wicks Steve (
talk)
06:03, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
I suggest you stop being so arrogant and learn to accept when you are wrong. Wicks Steve ( talk) 01:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
The passage I quoted makes no mention of the "infobox UK place template" being an exception to the rule. Wicks Steve ( talk) 04:35, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I attempted to discuss the matter on the other editor's talk page and at BLPN. He has not responded meaningfully to either. Giant Snowman 13:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
@ Tmol42: next time you have a message for me, please address it to my talk page and not another, so that I can be better acquainted with it. -- Ebdòmero ( talk) 17:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
Thank you for your kind words. -- evrik ( talk) 16:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grammar schools debate may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 01:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyond 2011, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LSE ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Your upload of File:Buckinghamshire hundreds 2 Desborough.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot ( opt-out) 14:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paulinho (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
When, in this edit to White British you added the "Census England" ref, it pointed at a table for Wales. Do you know what the correct reference for England is? -- David Biddulph ( talk) 00:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you take a look at the recent edits to figures by IPs at that article - both in the infobox and in the opening text? They don't seem to me to add up, but I'm having some difficulty in finding the right tables at the ONS site to try and make the corrections. I haven't reverted the recent changes because I'm simply not sure what the correct figures are! Any help gratefully received. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 17:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.
It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I saw the great work that you had done with Demographics_of_England in the organisation of its tables and I was wondering whether they might be able to be extended to give information on Population density.
What I would do is then add a note to say:
Population density based on a calculated 130,427 km² area of the United Kingdom.
But my problem is that I don't have the technical skill to do this my self. Its just an idea but I think an adaptation like this would make the information even more meaningful.
Regards, Gregkaye ( talk) 12:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matt Baker (presenter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ellie Harrison ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Tottenham Hotspur F.C. players may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of poor law unions in England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chiltern Hills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Well. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bicester may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Midshires Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Midshires Way may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 22:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Midshires Way, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Winslow, Sawley and Duffield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--
The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Please explain how what I wrote is less neutral than what was there before. – Smyth\ talk 20:42, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Please respond. – Smyth\ talk 12:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:
Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on
our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--
The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of trade unions in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPU. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For your selfless help with the Edward Bishop article. Schwede 66 03:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC) |
Hello Tmol, thank you for your advice the other day. I actually work in the field of computer science and I have tried to look at the issue of data on the Education section of the British Nigerian page as objectively as possible. I assure you I have no political agenda, except for ensuring that the mostly favorable data on the academic achievements of British Nigerian children are represented fully on the British Nigerian page.
While I feel it is unfair to comment on other users directly, it is clear to me that others do not want fair and balanced reporting of data on specific groups for personal reasons (I assure you I am not one of them). The whole point of Wikipedia is to provide an accurate resource for information free of personal bias and I fail to see how using information from the IPPR report for example doesn't do that.
It isn't my idea of a fun evening, writing numerous posts online to ensure that the achievements of another ethnic group are accurately portrayed. But when I see users editing information based on their own personal bias, then I feel compelled to act. I agree that the Education section is in need of improvement along with the majority of the page, but I have been stymied in my efforts to correct it and provide more information.
Also one must never be afraid to report the facts and you as a fellow man of science know that rationality must never be second to dogma or political opinion.
Thanks for your time
Nograviti ( talk) Nograviti ( talk) 10:53, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, had a feeling that was wrong, but didn't understand why it linked to what was the plantation in Virginia article in the first place. Thanks for fixing. Famartin ( talk) 21:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I see you've contributed to a discussion regarding education statistics at Talk:British Nigerian. Would you be interested in taking a look at a similar one at Talk:Somalis in the United Kingdom? Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. I'm concerned about developments at this article. A couple of editors with a very close relationship now seem to be collaborating to remove perfectly well sourced material from the article. As a longstanding contributor, do you want to take a look? Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:36, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
British Bangladeshi, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:39, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. Thanks for noticing my erroneous edit on the Hugo Lloris page. I do not know how that happened. I've since done another edit that's correct. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RadicalRedRaccoon ( talk • contribs) 10:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Tmol42,
The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you were one of the very first testers of VisualEditor, back in 2012 or early 2013. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work better for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.
You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.
More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.
Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
I worked on creating a section to add to the Job Interview Wiki page for a class project. The section I wrote was on Interview Anxiety. I've submitted several times and never received word back why the content was rejected. I asked a friend to try submitting, and this person received word that the article was written as "advice to the reader" and that the "you" "we" and "advice" content needed to be removed. I removed the "advice-like" content, but the section was removed once again. Is there any way I can get this posted? Or is this content just not applicable to this page? Is there something else I am doing incorrectly? Thank you. Lrl20092015 ( talk) 13:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you taking the time to reply to my question. I apologize for my ignorance related to the etiquette of posting to Wikipedia and for conversing with editors; I certainly did not intentionally mean to offend anyone. Thank you for revising and finding space for this subject. Lrl20092015 ( talk) 19:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42. I saw that you reverted an edit to Ethnic groups in London. I almost made the same revert myself, assuming it was to do with the rounding, but when I checked the source, it looks like the IP was actually correcting it correctly - if that makes sense! Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:48, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi I'm trying to update & refresh the entry to reflect that The Work Foundation has appointed a new Director this month. There are also a number of factual inaccuracies about the work it does and the history of its insolvency. You might regard these as controversial, I just regard them as demonstrably inaccurate. It should be borne in mind that Will Hutton stepped down from the CEO role in 2008 yet the entry (in my view) focuses largely on him and his role. I'd appreciate guidance about how to make these changes in an objective way. I certainly don't want to re-write history (I'm happy, for example, to keep in references to the insolvency) but I would say that the explanation for the insolvency is unbalanced, contains factual inaccuracies and could be regarded as having an 'agenda' against Mr Hutton by implying that the 'decline' of the organisation was wholly attributable to him. My overall aim is to bring the entry up to date and to emphasise The Work Foundation's current research interests, priorities and Director. I am still employed by The Work Foundation and was a Director during the acquisition. Happy to discuss how we resolve this. SteveBevan ( talk) 15:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)SteveBevan
SteveBevan ( talk) 10:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)SteveBeva
Are you still actively involved in the Project? I'm looking to improve on the articles in relation to Aylesbury and surrounding areas. Cheers. Uamaol ( talk) 21:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tmol42 . As a former contributor to the Somalis in the United Kingdom article, I wanted to let you know about a discussion I started about getting the article to GA status, following the issuing of a topic ban to Middayexpress for POV editing of this and other articles. Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. As someone who has shown some interest in articles about immigration to the UK, I wondered if you might like to comment on the FAC discussion for Gateway Protection Programme? A previous discussion was archived due to a lack of participation, and I am keen to avoid the same happening again. Any thoughts you have on the article would be much appreciated. Cordless Larry ( talk) 12:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Chesham Town Crest 01.jpg.
This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.
Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 22:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 23:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by
The Interior,
Ocaasi,
UY Scuti,
Sadads, and
Nikkimaria
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:H&C School Logo copy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi,
Samwalton9,
UY Scuti, and
Sadads
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by
Nikkimaria,
Sadads and
UY Scuti
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs),
Samwalton9 (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
UY Scuti (
talk ·
contribs),
Samwalton9 (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017
Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Tmol42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018
Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Tmol42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 03:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team -- 16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)