|
Good catch. Probably a good idea to leave a note on the user's page, though; it's more of a content disagreement than vandalism, so should at least be brought up with the user. Chris Cunningham ( talk) 13:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I see you've been deleting sources, commenting:
I'm not aware of any rule which requires that sources be freely-available. That does apply to external links, but we use many sources that require some kind fo fee or registration. Removing sources should only be done for very good reasons. Would you mind undoing those deletions? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
The other day I just miss read the column name on that bitpump thing. But I think there should be a column for freeware and shareware as well.
DJAikou (
talk)
04:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like a great idea! DJAikou ( talk) 20:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Just wondering how I can better clarify the Union Theatre's NOTABILITY for the article I've started. Including the reference to it in the 1996 edition of The Rover (play) where the theatre was noted for its production of the rare text I felt gave a good bit of notability to the theatre.
I do have more information to add to the site to increase its notability forthcoming, including a connection to a visit from a famous Canadian Playwright Timothy Findlay.
Are these two elements what one would be looking for to add notability?
The "speedy deletion" tag was removed by the admin a few days ago after she noted that it was not an advertising site since the theatre has been closed for over 10 years. Have you chosen then to add in this new "notability" tag to help me clarify things? I greatly appreciate you doing it so nicely (some of my Wikipedia correspondance hasn't always been so kind).-- Germahughes ( talk) 19:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
A suspected sock case you filed has been reopened and reassessed. Please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rohit tripathi60.
Best,
FT2 (
Talk |
email)
06:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I need assistance in building a sock puppet case against the user you warned on my talk page. I've never done one before, but I think I have documented things well. Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you. -- McDoobAU93 ( talk) 18:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
How do we block that IP address of 74.163.223.240? They've been warned numerous times, and it's doing is being disruptive. I don't have admin access, so I can't do anything about it. Eagles Fan In Tampa 18:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Good catch. Probably a good idea to leave a note on the user's page, though; it's more of a content disagreement than vandalism, so should at least be brought up with the user. Chris Cunningham ( talk) 13:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I see you've been deleting sources, commenting:
I'm not aware of any rule which requires that sources be freely-available. That does apply to external links, but we use many sources that require some kind fo fee or registration. Removing sources should only be done for very good reasons. Would you mind undoing those deletions? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:33, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
The other day I just miss read the column name on that bitpump thing. But I think there should be a column for freeware and shareware as well.
DJAikou (
talk)
04:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like a great idea! DJAikou ( talk) 20:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Just wondering how I can better clarify the Union Theatre's NOTABILITY for the article I've started. Including the reference to it in the 1996 edition of The Rover (play) where the theatre was noted for its production of the rare text I felt gave a good bit of notability to the theatre.
I do have more information to add to the site to increase its notability forthcoming, including a connection to a visit from a famous Canadian Playwright Timothy Findlay.
Are these two elements what one would be looking for to add notability?
The "speedy deletion" tag was removed by the admin a few days ago after she noted that it was not an advertising site since the theatre has been closed for over 10 years. Have you chosen then to add in this new "notability" tag to help me clarify things? I greatly appreciate you doing it so nicely (some of my Wikipedia correspondance hasn't always been so kind).-- Germahughes ( talk) 19:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
A suspected sock case you filed has been reopened and reassessed. Please see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Rohit tripathi60.
Best,
FT2 (
Talk |
email)
06:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I need assistance in building a sock puppet case against the user you warned on my talk page. I've never done one before, but I think I have documented things well. Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you. -- McDoobAU93 ( talk) 18:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
How do we block that IP address of 74.163.223.240? They've been warned numerous times, and it's doing is being disruptive. I don't have admin access, so I can't do anything about it. Eagles Fan In Tampa 18:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)