This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Why did you delete digitaljournal.com? The site has been online for years with sources for all of the listing details.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rwxrwxrwx ( talk) 11:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belton ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:43, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello Szzuk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Boston Parkrun for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Natureium ( talk) 14:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

It appears that you tried to do a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. You need to remember this. It's important to never copy & paste articles. The only exception is where all the content was written by you with no other edits, and the page is in your userspace. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 19:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:MerseyGatewayBridge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Combe Parkrun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Combe Parkrun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 02:24, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Parkruns in the United States of America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clermont ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:17, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guernsey Parkrun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guernsey Parkrun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BubbleEngineer ( talk) 16:13, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I did a lot of work on your article to bring it up to Wikipedia standards. Please look at the history to see my revisions. I looked at several sources and found information that either wasn't stated in the source or that was closely paraphrased. Please try to stick to the source on your next article and avoid copying from it. I also added Wikipedia links where appropriate; this gives the page more weight. Finally, I formatted the references. There's no need to use a long string as the ref name; it just clogs up the server. Three letters will do. If I can help you with anything in future, please contact me at my talk page. Best, Yoninah ( talk) 23:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

On 14 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loggerheads Country Park, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Loggerheads Country Park has a corn mill with a restored water wheel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Loggerheads Country Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi - thanks for the contact. My preference is to have separate articles for historic houses as they have their own identity and are linked to historical figures and events. A similar problem arises when the houses are used as schools and the history is swamped by unconnected and more transitory information. Good work on writing up country parks. I have just spent the afternoon at Swinley Forest. Regards Motmit ( talk) 18:46, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Leasowe Lighthouse at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Josh Milburn ( talk) 09:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Grappenhall Heys Walled Garden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 21:00, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Shipley Country Park, Szzuk!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Redirecting to an existing article. (It's always well worth checking before spending a lot of time on a new page.) Thanks for going to all the trouble though.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes ( talk) 12:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating West Park, Long Eaton, Szzuk!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice one! Another location near to where I live, too. You should get rid of the DAB link to Fishpond, and I would prefer to see references entered more effectively - with titles and so forth - they are rather minimalistic at present. Why not add an External Link to West Park on Google maps - always a nice touch, I tend to think. Cheers

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes ( talk) 21:48, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Parkruns in the United States of America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in the United States of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natureium ( talk) 19:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherwood Pines Forest Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burrows ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi - would you consider reopening the AfD on Erdor? I don't believe the strength of argument establishes a consensus for Keep. WP:NEXIST concerns the actual existence of sources, not WP:MUSTBESOURCES arguments when no one is able to demonstrate the existence of sources. All !votes were WP:VAGUEWAVEs which declared sources existed but, on inquiry, were unable to actually name any of the alleged sources. I don't believe WP:NEXIST covers keeping an unsourced article for 14 years when no one is able to actually provide evidence of a single source when asked. Per WP:NRVE sources, while not needed in the article per NEXIST, still must be verifiable. Thanks. Chetsford ( talk) 19:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Came to nitpick the same: WP:NEXIST would require at least demonstrating the existence of sources. They might not be in the article, but a claim with no evidence should be ignored. The AFD doesn't include a single example of a valid reliable secondary source. We have a keep for "If more sources are found", a keep for "There's sources" (none given) and a keep for "per above" (none given). There's no demonstration of sourcing, so the closest "keep" argument from this AFD is to follow BOZ's redirect suggestion.-- ferret ( talk) 19:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I've relisted it. Regards. Szzuk ( talk) 20:20, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grappenhall heys walled garden.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 02:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grappenhall heys board 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre ( t • c) 02:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Parkruns in the United States of America, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arlington and Renton ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:16, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for creating Gloucester Park in Gloucester, I was going to create it one day but i could not find any links but looks like you found some and got around to it before me. Many thanks again D Eaketts ( talk) 18:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the comment, I've been creating a lot of park articles as you can tell from my talk page, I'm finding them easier to write and reference the more I make. I'm currently writing Victoria Park in Bideford, they have some cannons around the bandstand that I'd like to see one day. Szzuk ( talk) 18:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Sounds good Szzuk, I am mostly concentrating on the history of Gloucester, more specifically the Grade I and II listed buildings and churches in and around the city and i try to the same depending on the article, The park was just a one off article to include in my list of Wikipedia articles. D Eaketts ( talk) 18:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

I maintain List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom, I added the South West England section today, I fill in missing parks just because I like parks, I'm a national trust member and particularly enjoyed creating Bath Skyline and Plymbridge Woods. Szzuk ( talk) 18:57, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Ooo, looks good Szzuk, I hope one of my articles will be better than C one day. Looking forward to seeing one of them on the main page as well and I will have a look at your other articles over the next few days. D Eaketts ( talk) 19:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

I have reverted the last change on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dekker Dreyer as the last revision was consisting of a broke template of two lines that the bot was not able to remove from AfD lists. For example it is still on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers because of the revision that you did despite being closed for so long now (and as you can see by checking revision history for both lists, I haven't done anything or relisted it on those pages. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 17:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Sure let's just leave it be now. Thanks for the heads up. Szzuk ( talk) 18:55, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hiya. Sorry to bother you, but I'm trying to do a bulk AfD and getting into a terrible mess. I can't seem to make the template Subst:AfD1 work... Any help appreciated? Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:47, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

I'd forgotten setting them up can be problematic, I will assist. Szzuk ( talk) 08:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

It's basically the last two columns of list of mountains in Fujairah apart from Jebel Wamm, which is good. I also asked User:SportingFlyer... Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 08:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

It is best to wait a couple of days to see if there any other responses. If there is no policy reason they shouldn't be bulk nominated then I think it should start with 5 articles. Can you do before on them and write a nomination for that 5? I can do the back office stuff probably avoiding a wp:trainwreck and post back to you what steps you would need to take to do another 5 at a later stage, but I don't want to do all of these, it isn't really my interest. Szzuk ( talk) 09:11, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Sure, and I appreciate the help/lack of interest in UAE mountains! And, yes, if I can get the procedure to work I'm more than happy to take it on. The template, for now, defeats me utterly... Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 09:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

If you want to drop some likely delete articles into my talk page with the nomination I will get them on and we'll see how it goes. Szzuk ( talk) 18:57, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Hiya. Here goes!

These articles are part of a series of tens of geographical stubs (settlements as well as mountains) created some ten years ago, presumably as part of a WP page creation drive. They all fail WP:V, GNG and WP:GEOLAND. I've done BEFORE on them as well as following the markers (which all lead to random terrain, scrubland, wadi beds and, in one case, an oil terminal) and they are all simply misleading cruft that has led to thousands of pages of rubbish spawning all over the Internet and obscuring the actual, verifiable geography of the UAE.

Qur al Rikibi - pin points to non-notable area of terrain West of Dibba. Qur or khor is bay in Arabic.

Jabal Ruham - pin points to flat scrubland off Fujairah/Mleiha road

Jabal Rumh - pin points to non-notable area of hills north of village of Aqdah

Jabal Ruwaydah - pin points to wadi near village of Tawyeen. There are sources for an area called Ruwaydah on the Batinah coast of Oman. Also in Qatar! There's a single mention of a 500 metre high Jebel Ruwaydah at the head of the Wadi Sidkha (near Khatt), but that seems a little tenuous. It's certainly not at this location and arguably not notable.

Jabal Safad - Pin points to random terrain inland of Qurayyah. It's a mountain in the Druze area of Lebanon...

Jabal Satif - Pin points to non-notable side of wadi in lowland North of the E87 road.

Jabal Sha'ra - Pin points to area now in Oman (would have been UAE in 1940s/50s), but it's just random terrain anyway. It's the Biblical Mount Seir, BTW.

Jabal Shariyah - Pin points to non-notable rocky terrain south west of Masafi.

Jabal Sharmah - Pin points to area of hilly terrain west of Masafi.

With heartfelt thanks! Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 04:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

• OK i got some of them on. Can you check for errors? Please don't add those I missed though because it'll just cause problems, there is no particular reason I left them off other than there's always another day for them! Szzuk ( talk) 08:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

On 9 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vale Park, New Brighton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that brass bands have been a feature of Vale Park since its opening in 1899, when one played the crowd in through the gates? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vale Park, New Brighton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Vale Park, New Brighton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ( talk) 00:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

On 13 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Royden Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Wirral Model Engineering Society operates a raised railway track for fine scale models of full-size steam locomotives at Royden Park? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royden Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Royden Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

On 14 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loggerheads Country Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Loggerheads Country Park has a corn mill with a restored water wheel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Loggerheads Country Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Loggerheads Country Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

On 2 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leasowe Lighthouse, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Leasowe Lighthouse had the only known female lighthouse keeper when it ceased operating in 1908? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leasowe Lighthouse. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Leasowe Lighthouse), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

On 4 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bestwood Country Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one account has it that King Charles II offered his mistress Nell Gwyn (pictured) "all the land she could ride around before breakfast"—and the next morning she rode out early and encircled what would become Bestwood Park? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bestwood Country Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Bestwood Country Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

On 18 September 2018, Did you know' was updated with a fact from the article Arrowe Country Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Arrowe Country Park sits on land purchased in 1800 by the Mayor of Liverpool with money earned from the slave trade?' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arrowe Country Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Arrowe Country Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

On 26 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grappenhall Heys Walled Garden, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grappenhall Heys Walled Garden has ponds which were originally marl pits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grappenhall Heys Walled Garden. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Grappenhall Heys Walled Garden), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih ( talk) 00:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Notification re Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Curriculum (England and Wales) (2nd nomination). Algarve1233 ( talk) 17:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Szzuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

hello! I merged all the material from Urban Center (art gallery) into Municipal Art Society, per the AfD result. I saw that you tagged UC for merge; do you know how to finish things up by deleting Urban Center? ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 02:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, the standard complete to a merge is to redirect the article, this is to retain the article history. I have done this so the merge is now complete. Szzuk ( talk) 08:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very kindly! ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 05:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi! I noticed you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Experimental hip hop as no consensus. Shouldn't this have been treated as WP:NOQUORUM soft delete per lack of no votes and no opposion to the nominator which counts as a delete vote (and it even has sock puppets voting) with WP:REFUND as was practiced by admins on AfD? Maybe, it should be reverted for admin to decide? Thanks, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 20:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

I closed it on bullet point 2 from noquorom - closing as "no consensus" with no prejudice against speedy renomination (NPASR). It looks fine to me. Szzuk ( talk) 21:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

The bullet point you used that is from this If the nomination has received very few or no comments but appears controversial to the closing administrator. You think it is controversial? If it is not controversial then it is If a nomination has received few or no comments from any editor with no one opposing deletion, and the article hasn't been declined for proposed deletion in the past, the closing administrator should treat the XfD nomination as an expired PROD. Generally, this will result in soft deletion.

Yes, because of the sock activity. Szzuk ( talk) 21:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough then. I may not agree (since the sock vote is negated and should be acted like it never existed), but I understand the argument. Thanks for the explanation. And don't worry, I will not take this to Deletion review or anything. Just wanted to discuss, if you got offended or something, I am sorry. Regards, Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 21:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

No worries. Szzuk ( talk) 21:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tyrannosaurus. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Apparently, you do not practice writing in English grammar, as your sentences are often connected by commas. It's easy to appreciate your dedication toward improving the article, but editors are expected to compose English correctly, so please try to apply the rules of grammar. Zefr ( talk) 15:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

@ Zefr, I was adding information in good faith, that is sourced, maybe it needs a little copy editing, do you disagree with the factual accuracy? The FAR said the section needs filling, so that is what I am doing. I'm happy for you or someone else to copyedit the information for flow as you've done previously and then it'll look fine. This is a collaboration no? Szzuk ( talk) 16:01, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Anyone can see your edits are in good faith to improve the article to FA quality. I'm just struck that you apparently don't know how to write a correctly formatted sentence. -- Zefr ( talk) 16:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

I probably don't use enough full stops, for what it is worth i'm a native English speaker! I suppose in the past I've had people want a reference or cite for every sentence so I spread the sentences out with commas to avoid having repetitive refs/cites. Szzuk ( talk) 16:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Substituting commas for a full stop when a sentence ends is not a rule of English grammar! Think of a child WP user reading an FA article, and seeing grammar rules broken like that. Just use the repeat ref format, WP:REFNAME. -- Zefr ( talk) 16:16, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Widnes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hutchinson ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heinz Guderian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Panzer Leader ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Magnus Brechtken.

User:Newslinger while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for contributing this article to Wikipedia!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Newslinger}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—  Newslinger  talk 10:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Matthias Schmidt.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

While you can certainly make the case that Schmidt meets WP:NACADEMIC criterion #1, based on the sources available it may be more appropriate to have an article about Albert Speer: The End of a Myth and redirect Schmidt to that article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. It might have been best if Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suparatana Bencharongkul was closed by an admin, since it was mentioned during the discussion the the article should be checked for similarities to past deleted versions. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 04:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I read your comment. Even if the article was similar to a deleted version no admin would or should over rule the consensus of that AfD. The outcome of an AfD over rules prior deletions so no admin will even check. Szzuk ( talk) 06:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Myth of the clean Wehrmacht, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@ K.e.coffman:. I've started editing Halder, I will see what else I can find. Szzuk ( talk) 21:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm more or less done with Halder. It is just too far from GA for it to be worth taking there or much further. I have a copy of The Myth now, so I'm going to have a read through. Szzuk ( talk) 17:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

@ K.e.coffman: I'm struggling to find a source for his life before WWII. Can you recommend anything? Szzuk ( talk) 11:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

I added material from the German biographical dictionary available online: Franz Halder. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:59, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I will re-add The Myth. It just didn't fit properly at the time of writing. Szzuk ( talk) 04:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I see you have sent it to the Guild of Copy Editors to pick up grammar and punctuation errors. It is probably close to GA standard now, send as and when. Szzuk ( talk) 10:14, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

@ K.e.coffman: I'm going to do a copy and paste from the myth section here to the main article Myth of the clean Wehrmacht. Wikipedia requires attribution even from other Wikipedia articles. After I've done the copy paste I will note on the talk page I wrote the material in question and have access to all of the sources I have used. As you also wrote some of the material I would need you to formally say there that you wrote the other material. I presume that is OK but I will hold off until there is a reply. Szzuk ( talk) 06:47, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

• You generally don't need anyone's permission (i.e. mine) to copy text between articles. Also, a simple edit summary is generally sufficient. I use: "Material copied from XYZ page - please see article history for attribution". See for example edit summary from the initial creation of the Barbara Engelking article. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. For the reasons explained in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia#Proper attribution, leaving a {{ copied}} note on the talk page of the article copied from is good practice. (Personally I also use one on the talk page of the article copied to.) Cheers. Gog the Mild ( talk) 21:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi @ Szzuk: do you think the page can make good article status I was going to recommended it to be? and would the category be world history? Jack90s15 ( talk) 15:54, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

It is probably better if myself or @ K.e.coffman: send it. This is because the Good Article criteria may require access to the books and other sources that have been used in the article. Szzuk ( talk) 16:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@ Szzuk: OK I get that I did try to Nominate one page I do have information for /info/en/?search=World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union it seems like it takes some time for it to be reviewed. I am happy I was able to help put a picture in and some sources for the page! Jack90s15 ( talk) 18:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

@ Jack90s15: I think it would be best if Szzuk nominates the page since they have access to all the sources, which is sometimes necessary during GA review process. It generally takes a while for a nomination to be picked up for review. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 02:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

I've nominated Myth of the clean Wehrmacht. If I'm not around when the review starts then I'd hope one of you two would see it through. Szzuk ( talk) 12:20, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

@ K.e.coffman:OK I understand that. And ok @ Szzuk: I am knowledgeable on the subject and some of the sources that are used on the page! Jack90s15 ( talk) 19:46, 7 August 2019‎ (TC)

I've added you both as co-nominators. Szzuk ( talk) 18:43, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

@ Szzuk: OK! Jack90s15 ( talk) 14:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Myth of the clean Wehrmacht you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 12:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Could you please clarify you have access to all book sources used in this article? Could you also let me know whether you think they could be picked up in a library or not? Regards, Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

I have most of the sources. Some info predated my additions so I don't have everything. Do you need to know exactly what I have or don't have? Szzuk ( talk) 21:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

@ Willbb234:I have the following sources and couldn't get any of the others. Szzuk ( talk) 21:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

• Anderson, Truman (July 2000). "Germans, Ukrainians and Jews: Ethnic Politics in Heeresgebiet Sud, June– December 1941". War in History. 7 (3): 325–351. doi:10.1177/096834450000700304.
• Beorn, Waitman (2014). Marching into Darkness. London, UK: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-72550-8.
• Bartov, Omer (1986). The Eastern Front, 1941-1945, German Troops and the Barbarisation of Warfare. New York: St. Martins Press. ISBN 0312224869.
• Epstein, Catherine (2015). Nazi Germany Confronting the Myths. U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ISBN 978-1-118-29479-6.
• Evans, Richard J. (1989). In Hitler's Shadow West German Historians and the Attempt to Escape the Nazi Past. New York: Pantheon. ISBN 978-0394576862.
• Foray, Jennifer (October 2010). "The 'Clean Wehrmacht' in the German-occupied Netherlands, 1940–5". Journal of Contemporary History. 45 (4): 768–787. doi:10.1177/0022009410375178. JSTOR 25764581.
• Förster, Jürgen (Winter 1988). "Barbarossa Revisited: Strategy and Ideology in the East". Jewish Social Studies. 50 (1/2): 21–36. JSTOR 4467404.
• Förster, Jürgen (2005). "The German Military's Image of Russia". Russia War, Peace and Diplomacy. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
• Heer, Hannes; Manoschek, Walter; Pollak, Alexander; Wodak, Ruth (2008). The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht's War of Annihilation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9780230013230.
• Hébert, Valerie (2010). Hitler's Generals on Trial: The Last War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-1698-5.
• Hilberg, Raul (1985). The Destruction of the European Jews. New York: Holmes & Meier. ISBN 9780841908321.
• Ingrao, Christian (2013). Believe and Destroy: Intellectuals in the SS War Machine. Malden, MA: Polity. ISBN 978-0-7456-6026-4.
• Large, David C. (1987). "Reckoning without the Past: The HIAG of the Waffen-SS and the Politics of Rehabilitation in the Bonn Republic, 1950–1961". The Journal of Modern History. 59 (1): 79–113. doi:10.1086/243161. JSTOR 1880378.
• Neitzel, Sonke (2005). Tapping Hitler's Generals: Transcripts of Secret Conversations 1942 - 45. London, UK: Frontline Books. ISBN 978-1848327153.
• Müller, Rolf-Dieter (2016). Hitler's Wehrmacht, 1935-1945. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 9780813168111. OCLC 971043078.
• Shepherd, Ben (June 2009). "The Clean Wehrmacht, the War of Extermination, and Beyond". War in History. 52 (2): 455–473. doi:10.1017/S0018246X09007547.
• Smelser, Ronald; Davies, Edward J. (2008). The Myth of the Eastern Front: The Nazi-Soviet War in American Popular Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83365-3.
• Stahel, David (2009). Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-76847-4.
• von Lingen, Kerstin (2009) [2009]. Kesselring's Last Battle: War Crimes Trials and Cold War Politics, 1945-1960. USA: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0700616411.
• Wette, Wolfram (2007). The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674025776.

I don’t need the sources but it is helpful so that I can tick the verifiability box in the GA criteria without too many problems. It is also helpful so that I can trust the article will stay in a stable condition if someone happens to challenge any information in the article. Regards, Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 06:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Virtually the whole article was written by the GA interested parties, myself, Jacks, K.e.coffman and Kudpung (article creator) so it wouldn't suffer from vandalism or unverifiable info much. Szzuk ( talk) 06:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

I do apologies for the list of minor changes. The truth of the matter is that I was reading offline so I noted down anything that needed changing, but then you so kindly did it yourself. Thanks a lot, Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 19:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

You are a credit to the project. Thank you. Szzuk ( talk) 19:09, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Russia: War, Peace and Diplomacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://soldierexecutionerprolifer2008.blogspot.com/2015/03/war-crimes-of-wehrmacht.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mcampany ( talk) 20:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, you can ignore this. I missed that the blog originally copied the content from the same Wikipedia article you spun this out from. Mcampany ( talk) 20:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for the speedy undo! Szzuk ( talk) 20:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

The article Myth of the clean Wehrmacht you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Myth of the clean Wehrmacht for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 ( talk) 19:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

• Szzuk & @ Jack90s15: nice work; congratulations! Do you guys plan to nominate the article for DYK? It would be nice to get the article onto the main page. There's a seven-day window in which to do it. -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 15:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

• Your work was valuable too. I'm not doing DYK though, it is a lot of effort and not my thing. Szzuk ( talk) 15:50, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@ K.e.coffman: @ Szzuk: What does that entail? still new to nominations Jack90s15 ( talk) 18:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

You can get a new GA onto the "Did You Know" section of the Main Page, with one line/fact from the article. It isn't my thing really, and complicated, so personally I'm giving it a miss. Szzuk ( talk) 18:14, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

It would be a great shame if an article like this missed the chance to be on the main page. If you like I would be happy to submit a DYK nom myself, being somewhat familiar with the process.

By the way, excellent job getting it up to and through GAN. Gog the Mild ( talk) 21:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. Jacks and K. e. Coffman are sending it to DYK. I will let them sort it out. Szzuk ( talk) 21:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For being Such a kind person to Work with on that project! if you ever decided to nominate the article for anything else I'll be more then happy to help! Jack90s15 ( talk) 21:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. I don't keep barnstars or badges on my userpage. However I do appreciate receiving them. Szzuk ( talk) 08:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falls Road ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:57, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Myth of the clean Wehrmacht has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist ( talk) 13:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, good work on Greater London not much to go now. I'm happy to search for secondary references once done. If I can't find any, should a primary reference just be added in its place? Regards, Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi, sure that would be good. I've just checked to see if there is a printed book available which would make referencing a lot easier, but alas there is nothing I can find. Szzuk ( talk) 21:23, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Do you think that the page is ready for GAN? If yes, would you like to nominate it? -- K.e.coffman ( talk) 15:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

The page is ready. You nominate and put me on as co-nominator. The myth section is mine so I'll do that etc. and whatever else if you aren't around. Regards. Szzuk ( talk) 15:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

@ K.e.coffman: Do you know of any good sources on Gehlen? It looks like he was the Nazi spymaster on the Eastern Front and introduced widespread torture, his article doesn't mention any of that and I'd like to add it. Szzuk ( talk) 22:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, sorry to bother you. In regards to the country abbreviations, I have done Derbyshire to Derb (maybe Derbs is better, thoughts?). East Midlands, East of England and Greater London look fine, but I'm not sure how to approach North East? Tyne and Wear is a little confusing and so is County Durham. Any thoughts on these? North West is a little confusing as well, Lancashire to Lancs, Cheshire can stay the same, Greater Manchester? It could be worth doing everything in its full name for consistency throughout the article. This can be easily done with WP:AWB, so any thoughts on that? If you think it should be, its probably best to ask for consensus and thoughts from others. Sorry for the confusion and all the questions. Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Your edits were fine, I did look up usual abbreviations some months ago, although I've forgotten now! I think Derbyshire is Derbs, Lancashire is Lancs, Greater Manchester is sometimes Gtr Manchester, County Durham sometimes just gets shortened confusingly to Durham. Tyne and Wear I don't really know. I have never used AWB, I will see if I can install it. Regards Szzuk ( talk) 21:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Cool, I use WP:JWB. Works fine and easier to install. Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 22:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Hampshire to Hamps? Willbb234 ^Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:19, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, sure. Szzuk ( talk) 21:22, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillingham ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)