This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
On 1 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Althea McNish, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Althea McNish is not American, but she is descended from a Merikin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Althea McNish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
On 3 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Annie Furuhjelm, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Annie Furuhjelm of Finland was the first elected woman legislator to speak before the British Parliament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Furuhjelm. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
On 3 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ida Sedgwick Proper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ida Sedgwick Proper was a founding member of the feminist group Heterodoxy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ida Sedgwick Proper. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
A Barnstar to thank you for your contributions | |
---|---|
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women writers worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 13:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hi SusunW. I'm an editor of the Italian Wikipedia. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks,-- Kenzia ( talk) 08:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes SusunW, I found it really interesting at a first reading. I have to read it better, in a critical way. I take your point that reporting divorces and marriages in writing an article should be necessary, both for women and men, to understand the events of one's life. Though the issue of names is very relevant from a gender point of vue. The fact that women's names change in most culture upon marriage and divorce is a reflection of a patriarchal mentality. The name is very important in the construction of one's identity. Even the fact that, for exemple in Italy, we take our name after our father is the reflection of a mentality. Now, there is a law that allow the right to take your mother's name if you wish it, before it wasn't permitted. I think that we don't have to take the issue of names for granted, even if it has been the reflection of the cultural history of a country. Maybe we should make a deeper reflection on this issue. I totally agree with you that it is a bias leaving women out of men's articles. My point is exactly that we should do a real effort to look for the relevant women in the men's lives, make research on them, and write about them, starting from daughters and mothers. In a man's life, especially in a successful man's life, women are determinant, they make the difference. We have to point that out. Until now those relevant women have been inexistant, anonymous for historians. This must change, and I thik that Wikipedia can contribute to that change. Pardon me for my english, I hope that i can make myself understood. -- Kenzia ( talk) 05:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you SusunW! It's wonderful to share the same point of vue :) -- Kenzia ( talk) 08:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
On 9 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lin Zongsu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lin Zongsu's article reporting her discussion of women's suffrage with Sun Yat-sen brought the right to vote into the public arena in China? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lin Zongsu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
On 10 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catharine van Tussenbroek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Catharine van Tussenbroek settled the question of the existence of ovarian pregnancy clinically and histologically in 1899? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catharine van Tussenbroek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
I just noticed your award. Congratulations. Best Charles01 ( talk) 11:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
tweet may make a good dyk? Victuallers ( talk) 08:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.
The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?
Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!
Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Your personal instructions for AFC submissions are:
If you see an article in the Draft: space that you think is ready for the mainspace (especially, but not solely, that it is unlikely to get deleted), then WP:MOVE it to the mainspace, delete all the AFC templates from the page, and tell the main editor(s) where to find it.
There's a long list of instructions for editors who have less experience than you, and scripts for people who do this a lot, but I don't think you need to worry about any of that. WP:Be bold and do what's right for the encyclopedia. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 21:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I see that you have written tons of articles about women. I wonder if you could assist me in a project I have "on the back burner". If you take a look at User:Buster7/The List - Women Artists you'll find a sandbox full of potential articles. I also have User:Buster7/The List - Men Artists. Editor Carptrash and I created the article List of United States post office murals about a year ago. While compiling the mural info I collected the muralists and planned on working on creating articles. I even created some 1/2 dozen or so and that's where I ran into trouble. Without going into too much detail most of the articles were torn apart because of plagiarism claims. I didn't have a good system of referencing etc. and plagiarism did happen...but none was intentional... and, with heavy heart, I just walked away from the project. With your help and guidance, maybe I could re-energize and get back to work. Maybe we could pick a couple of likely candidates and you could show me how to create quality trouble (and plagiarism) free articles. No rush. Whenever you can find the time. Buster Seven Talk 23:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
User:Buster7/Marianne Greer Appel and User:Buster7/Ethel V. Ashton and messed up both. Not sure what you meant by Remove the top two lines and instead paste in this template data [1]. I think I missed a step. Buster Seven Talk 13:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
..for all the leg work. I watch what you do (not a stalker) at the varied articles we are working on, to learn the HOW of article creation. Why was this diff neccesary? Just curious so I can understand. What was wrong and how did the diff fix it? Thanks, Buster Seven Talk 14:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Susun. I noticed somewhere you had commented on the differences in Google searches and ascribed it to your IP number. In my experience, the differences are indeed real and may be triggered by your location, the language settings on your PC and/or keyboard, and the search language you use. When researching Danes, for example, I find the Google results can vary quite considerably if I use google.dk rather than google.com. The Danish version turns up many Danish-language sources which are not displayed on an English-language search. That is one of the reasons I am annoyed when an article is sent for AfD when in fact a lot of info can be found in the relevant language. Once or twice, people have been amazed that I have quickly been able to find sources (e.g. about a Finn) when others have found nothing. Another trick is to include the name of a national newspaper or encyclopedia in the search. You may also be interested in this.-- Ipigott ( talk) 09:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
...3 things start to fade; hearing, sight and, um, I can't remember the third. Yesterday I was following the trail of one of the artists on The List and I called the library in Rochelle IL to confirm they had the mural and it was still hanging above their fireplace. It was not a WPA mural. But now, a day later, Ive forgotten the muralist's name. Any hint as to who it might be?
Buster Seven
Talk 12:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Yva is a great example of the work that you do for mitigating the gender gap. Thanks Susun for this one, noting that there are other that also deserve our gratitude. That sounds too formal ... so .... "Yay Susun Wooo!" Victuallers ( talk) 09:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday, Susun! Wishing you much happiness, plus cake! -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Happy birthday Susun. Long time we edited on some article. Nvvchar. 02:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Can you have a go at this please Template:Did you know nominations/Gold Wreaths from Thrace? Nvvchar. 01:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The Mary Wollstonecraft award for all your contributions on Women Writers | |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women in Photography worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
From the above I can see you are quite busy. No prob... The List has been on the back burner for a year. No rush! With your lead and guidance I will start to create some drafts, etc. and wait till you are less busy. Just knowing you are watching me "drive the new car" is solace that you wont let me have any accidents, As always, take care. Buster Seven Talk 14:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Teamwork barnstar | ||
I am honored to present you with this Teamwork barnstar for your assisting another editor in improving the article User:Buster7's List of Women Mural artists. Collaborative editing is a hallmark of Wikipedia, and is one of the surest ways to retain editors and to make Wikipedia a better place... and you have done both. Thank you, Buster Seven Talk 09:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC) |
North America 1000 22:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, SusunW. Martianne Appel, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 12:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
tweet of your new article #wikiwomeninred Victuallers ( talk) 15:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, SusunW. Ethel V. Ashton, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 14:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
On 1 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Althea McNish, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Althea McNish is not American, but she is descended from a Merikin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Althea McNish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 16:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
On 3 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Annie Furuhjelm, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Annie Furuhjelm of Finland was the first elected woman legislator to speak before the British Parliament? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Furuhjelm. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
On 3 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ida Sedgwick Proper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ida Sedgwick Proper was a founding member of the feminist group Heterodoxy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ida Sedgwick Proper. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
A Barnstar to thank you for your contributions | |
---|---|
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women writers worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 13:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hi SusunW. I'm an editor of the Italian Wikipedia. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks,-- Kenzia ( talk) 08:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes SusunW, I found it really interesting at a first reading. I have to read it better, in a critical way. I take your point that reporting divorces and marriages in writing an article should be necessary, both for women and men, to understand the events of one's life. Though the issue of names is very relevant from a gender point of vue. The fact that women's names change in most culture upon marriage and divorce is a reflection of a patriarchal mentality. The name is very important in the construction of one's identity. Even the fact that, for exemple in Italy, we take our name after our father is the reflection of a mentality. Now, there is a law that allow the right to take your mother's name if you wish it, before it wasn't permitted. I think that we don't have to take the issue of names for granted, even if it has been the reflection of the cultural history of a country. Maybe we should make a deeper reflection on this issue. I totally agree with you that it is a bias leaving women out of men's articles. My point is exactly that we should do a real effort to look for the relevant women in the men's lives, make research on them, and write about them, starting from daughters and mothers. In a man's life, especially in a successful man's life, women are determinant, they make the difference. We have to point that out. Until now those relevant women have been inexistant, anonymous for historians. This must change, and I thik that Wikipedia can contribute to that change. Pardon me for my english, I hope that i can make myself understood. -- Kenzia ( talk) 05:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you SusunW! It's wonderful to share the same point of vue :) -- Kenzia ( talk) 08:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
On 9 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lin Zongsu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lin Zongsu's article reporting her discussion of women's suffrage with Sun Yat-sen brought the right to vote into the public arena in China? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lin Zongsu. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
On 10 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catharine van Tussenbroek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Catharine van Tussenbroek settled the question of the existence of ovarian pregnancy clinically and histologically in 1899? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catharine van Tussenbroek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:57, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
I just noticed your award. Congratulations. Best Charles01 ( talk) 11:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
tweet may make a good dyk? Victuallers ( talk) 08:52, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.
The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?
Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!
Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Your personal instructions for AFC submissions are:
If you see an article in the Draft: space that you think is ready for the mainspace (especially, but not solely, that it is unlikely to get deleted), then WP:MOVE it to the mainspace, delete all the AFC templates from the page, and tell the main editor(s) where to find it.
There's a long list of instructions for editors who have less experience than you, and scripts for people who do this a lot, but I don't think you need to worry about any of that. WP:Be bold and do what's right for the encyclopedia. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 21:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I see that you have written tons of articles about women. I wonder if you could assist me in a project I have "on the back burner". If you take a look at User:Buster7/The List - Women Artists you'll find a sandbox full of potential articles. I also have User:Buster7/The List - Men Artists. Editor Carptrash and I created the article List of United States post office murals about a year ago. While compiling the mural info I collected the muralists and planned on working on creating articles. I even created some 1/2 dozen or so and that's where I ran into trouble. Without going into too much detail most of the articles were torn apart because of plagiarism claims. I didn't have a good system of referencing etc. and plagiarism did happen...but none was intentional... and, with heavy heart, I just walked away from the project. With your help and guidance, maybe I could re-energize and get back to work. Maybe we could pick a couple of likely candidates and you could show me how to create quality trouble (and plagiarism) free articles. No rush. Whenever you can find the time. Buster Seven Talk 23:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
User:Buster7/Marianne Greer Appel and User:Buster7/Ethel V. Ashton and messed up both. Not sure what you meant by Remove the top two lines and instead paste in this template data [1]. I think I missed a step. Buster Seven Talk 13:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--
Rosiestep (
talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe,
Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe,
Women in Red/Opt-out list)
..for all the leg work. I watch what you do (not a stalker) at the varied articles we are working on, to learn the HOW of article creation. Why was this diff neccesary? Just curious so I can understand. What was wrong and how did the diff fix it? Thanks, Buster Seven Talk 14:23, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Susun. I noticed somewhere you had commented on the differences in Google searches and ascribed it to your IP number. In my experience, the differences are indeed real and may be triggered by your location, the language settings on your PC and/or keyboard, and the search language you use. When researching Danes, for example, I find the Google results can vary quite considerably if I use google.dk rather than google.com. The Danish version turns up many Danish-language sources which are not displayed on an English-language search. That is one of the reasons I am annoyed when an article is sent for AfD when in fact a lot of info can be found in the relevant language. Once or twice, people have been amazed that I have quickly been able to find sources (e.g. about a Finn) when others have found nothing. Another trick is to include the name of a national newspaper or encyclopedia in the search. You may also be interested in this.-- Ipigott ( talk) 09:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
...3 things start to fade; hearing, sight and, um, I can't remember the third. Yesterday I was following the trail of one of the artists on The List and I called the library in Rochelle IL to confirm they had the mural and it was still hanging above their fireplace. It was not a WPA mural. But now, a day later, Ive forgotten the muralist's name. Any hint as to who it might be?
Buster Seven
Talk 12:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Yva is a great example of the work that you do for mitigating the gender gap. Thanks Susun for this one, noting that there are other that also deserve our gratitude. That sounds too formal ... so .... "Yay Susun Wooo!" Victuallers ( talk) 09:22, 1 May 2016 (UTC) |
Happy Birthday, Susun! Wishing you much happiness, plus cake! -- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:46, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Happy birthday Susun. Long time we edited on some article. Nvvchar. 02:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Can you have a go at this please Template:Did you know nominations/Gold Wreaths from Thrace? Nvvchar. 01:51, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The Mary Wollstonecraft award for all your contributions on Women Writers | |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women in Photography worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 07:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
From the above I can see you are quite busy. No prob... The List has been on the back burner for a year. No rush! With your lead and guidance I will start to create some drafts, etc. and wait till you are less busy. Just knowing you are watching me "drive the new car" is solace that you wont let me have any accidents, As always, take care. Buster Seven Talk 14:21, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Teamwork barnstar | ||
I am honored to present you with this Teamwork barnstar for your assisting another editor in improving the article User:Buster7's List of Women Mural artists. Collaborative editing is a hallmark of Wikipedia, and is one of the surest ways to retain editors and to make Wikipedia a better place... and you have done both. Thank you, Buster Seven Talk 09:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC) |
North America 1000 22:07, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, SusunW. Martianne Appel, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 12:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
tweet of your new article #wikiwomeninred Victuallers ( talk) 15:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, SusunW. Ethel V. Ashton, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot ( talk!) 14:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)