![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hi. There was no consensus to merge. The policy based responses were to delete. Please reconsider and revert your close. Onel5969 TT me 15:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 21 High Street Doha. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Onel5969 TT me 19:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I think you made the wrong call in closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination) given that keep !voters were never able to substantiate an actual case for how notability guidelines were met (as well as the prevalence of SPA IPs on the keep side). I'd ask you to reconsider your decision to NAC the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Badnaseeb. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. signed, Rosguill talk 02:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hey, Superastig. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi, I've undone your close of this AfD. For the rationale, see the relist comment. The BLP1E argument came late in the discussion, but merits to be addressed. -- Randykitty ( talk) 15:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Superastig non-admin AfD closes. Thank you. To be clear, I have proposed to topic ban you from closing AfDs.
Flatscan (
talk)
05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Tough luck bud. I'm kinda disappointed with the outcomes of those 2 DRVs. What you received was a double kill, make that triple kill because someone reported you to the AN. SBKSPP ( talk) 23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
disregard opinions and comments if they feel that there is strong evidence that they were not made in good faith. Such "bad faith" opinions include those being made by sock puppets, or accounts created solely for voting on the deletion discussion.That AfD had two IPs geolocating to the same place, making the same poorly-supported arguments with the same glaring English deficits, and had already been flagged as SPAs. It should not take someone else formally tagging them as socks for you to recognize they needed to be discounted (not to mention their arguments were strongly rebutted). You also closed three AfDs after participants had been blocked for socking, including one where a sock's !vote had already been struck. If you can't identify obvious bad-faith !voting you should not be closing dicussions. JoelleJay ( talk) 22:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
You also closed three AfDs after participants had been blocked for socking, including one where a sock's !vote had already been struck.:
Hi.
I have a question for you.
Why have you not engaged in the Administrators' noticeboard discussion concerning your AfD closures?
I now have this talk page on my watchlist.
I look forward to your response. - jc37 06:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Following my closure of this discussion at WP:AN, I am informing you that you are now subject to an topic ban, restricting you from closing AfD discussions. You may still take part in those discussions as a regular contributor, but you may no longer close them. The restriction is indefinite, but may be appealed at AN no sooner than six months from today. This restriction is recorded at WP:EDRC. Thank you. Girth Summit (blether) 12:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fatih Mehmet Gul. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. signed, Rosguill talk 18:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Superastig. I want to apologize for reverting your edits, I have read the MOS already, however, some things are still not yet clear to me. Is there a explicit statement in the MOS regarding the sub-section headers? If there is none, what is the reason why shouldn't put headers like "People related..."? Again, my apologies. Thank you! - jampol 08:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:VOP Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I just want to ask is you know the new radio station in Baguio 106.5 MHz? I just observed this station two months ago and I cannot determine the stations name and format until now. As of today, the station has no bumpers. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 14:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I was surprised to see this article got redirected to its deletion. Last time I checked, it's the only Marist school article that got deleted. Is it because it's a school in the Philippines? I digress. Anyway, I was active in editing this article in my other account years ago (now in hiatus). Though a year late already, I disagree with the decision so I might make a draft of it in my Sandbox. I can't disagree though if I can't see the argument against the deletion though. I can access books and news articles supporting its notability like I did in the other school articles I edited. Hard to find articles on the school since it gets buried along with the other "Marist". Anyway, let me know if I can still help recover the article, make a draft on a sandbox to bring it back, or just let it stay redirected to its non-existence. Peace! — Brother Allen ( talk) 13:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
got redirected to its deletion. There are other types of consensus aside from "delete". I closed it as "redirect" not because it's from the Philippines (that's an invalid argument per WP:ATA), but because it fails WP:NSCHOOL based on the consensus in the deletion discussion. We follow policy-based arguments when it comes to such deletion discussion.
Hi, Superastig!
I'm so sorry for that because I wanted to trying added or edited the pages or articles for some Brigada News FM stations in General Santos, Olongapo and Zamboanga that are licensed to Baycomms Broadcasting Corporation without any permission, which already mentioned in that infobox for it's stations.
I hope that I decided to stay longer as a wikipedia user that I created a new one, but next time I will try my best to edit, added or fix information in each articles.
Thank you so much! 😊 Jemz2023 ( talk) 09:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXNG-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 09:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is:
112.200.9.54 and perpetuating hoaxes?.
LilianaUwU (
talk /
contributions)
17:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
thanks for editing the dzlc cool fm!
Jairus Cambiado Ezekiel ( talk) 05:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC) |
Regarding to your revert on
Special:Diff/1159739033, the station already exists. The station already has a FB page (
facebook
The article Ben Balasador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM. Citations are about the actors, except the book...which may or may not contain an depth review.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
02:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, where is the source that 105.1 Baguio will be simulcast Brigada Korondal? ThisIsSeanJ ( talk) 01:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Superastig, you are now engaged in an edit war with me on the Ang Syota Kong Balikbayan page. I have explained to you why I reverted your edits. You are in contravention of WP:BRD. After an editor undoes your edit, you are meant to discuss the issue on the talk page, not continually revert back. Your argument so far has been to reference a previous editor's changes, which I supposedly left in place, with the contention that this somehow justifies your changes to remain in place. This is false, as the two are not related. You have introduced erroneous terminology into the article—title role—even though I explained that it is not applicable. Additionally, you have made the claim that imdb is verified, which is ridiculous, since it is a user-generated database. You need to stop this conflict and start engaging in a discussion, before this matter requires escalating into a noticeboard dispute. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 12:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
because so far, all you've done is revert: How were my contributions considered reverting when, in fact, I mostly made changes in the cast listing? Common sense, men.
Per consensus emerging at ANI ( link) regarding your persistent and egregious WP:OWN violations and other behavioural issues, I have indefinitely blocked your account from editing.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel ( talk) 04:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Superastig ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There are times when I have day-offs from Wikipedia at least once a week. Now that I came from my day-off yesterday, I was shocked to see that I'm blocked. I've read the recent replies in my appeal and I admit that I've gone way too far with losing my cool and creating a battleground, just like what happened in Ang Syota Kong Balikbayan, with this affecting my behavior, and I realized that I should not persist on my edits whenever I'm wrong in certain aspects. I apologize. Outside those issues, several of my other edits were done in good faith and in peace, like episode updates of every TV show and creating articles. I've been also reverting disruptive edits from various IP users several times. And I don't want my recent behavior to overshadow my said contributions in Wikipedia. I hope I'll be unblocked. And I'll do my best to be careful with my behavior and tone down my replies this time around. ASTIG 😎 🙃 01:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First of all, I'm rooting for you, because indeed you have done a lot of good here, and I have seen how much you care about this project. The main reason you were blocked was because of OWNership behavior. Please review it more carefully. You also should not OWN an article even whenever you're "right" in certain aspects. Or even most aspects. Barring vandalism, we have dispute resolution if you feel another's edits are not improving the article. Yes, you need to keep your cool, yes you need to avoid battleground behavior. But you'll need to show a better understanding of the OWN policy before you are unblocked. My recommendation is to try to reflect and figure out what motivates the OWNership reaction in the first place. I truly hope that is helpful. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello,
I realise this might feel either somewhat like piling on, but as I think you a likely individual to be unblocked and there was clear community consensus, there were other community consensuses to implement.
The most core of which is a 6 month moratorium from appealing your TBAN on AfD closes. The close can be seen here. I'll also add it to the list shortly. There was affirmative community consensus not to implement a more general AfD TBAN. Nosebagbear ( talk) 12:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Superastig ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Per WP:OWN, no one has the right to claim a certain article as their own. Whoever creates a certain article does not mean they own it. Every editor has the right to make changes to that article and, if ever any part of the article questioned, anyone can discuss it in the article's talk page to seek consensus. I realized that my recent involvement in editing Ang Syota Kong Balikbayan is a clear example of WP:OWN, where I went way too far with losing my cool and created a battleground. (No. 6 of WP:OWNBEHAVIOR) I acted as if I own the article by persisting with my edits. And blaming the reverter will not solve the problem. I apologize for such. The next time an editor reverts any of my edits in a certain article for a valid reason, I'll discuss in good faith regarding my edits in the article's talk page and respect whatever consensus we will reach. If I can't find a valid reason for my edits to be restored, instead of boldly standing by my edits and engaging in an edit war, I'll leave the article as is and respect the decision of the reverter. This is how toned down I'll be whenever I encounter such reversion this time around. ASTIG 😎 🙃 00:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Per the discussion with respect to stipulations and existing topic bans, and with the agreement below of the blocking admin. Superastig, don't hesitate to be in touch with any questions or clarifications. Star Mississippi 12:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Astig, last time there's a edit war on Eat Bulaga and the username is Jumark27. He even reverted and change content as he owns the article as per WP:OWN. Maybe you have to report to the administrators. I know you're not involved in it but I'm just telling you about happening last time. Please take your time to response this. Thank you Astig! Rhianna543 ( talk) 06:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Centerstage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2020
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
22:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Papunta Ka Pa Lang, Pabalik Na Ako, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papunta Ka Pa Lang, Pabalik Na Ako.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig. Thank you for your work on Talahib at Rosas. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Superastig, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ ™ 08:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
The article WJDI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet the WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Let'srun (
talk)
03:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Why are you removing coming of age and thriller on genre in the info box. Abs cbn entertainment article said coming of age. Other official sources say mystery thriller so it shouldn’t be removed. 120.28.249.22 ( talk) 15:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I heard you've been doing this episode update task for a very long time. I hope you don't mind if I have a chat with you here.
We all know that kapit sa patalim literally means holding on to a knife's blade, but it's generaly means taking a risk. Apologies for not inserting translations, but I believe everyone agrees that kapit sa patalim really means taking a risk. There's no need for sources about it. What bothers me is that HW reverted my edit on Lovers / Liars yesterday. I plan to bring back what's right, but NVM.
And why did HW escalate this issue about the kapit sa patalim into the reference used in episode updates? Ever since I started doing episode update task, I haven't received such useless warning until yesterday. They seem to act as if they're right. Kutsero ( talk) 03:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYHH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYDD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 19:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWIM-AM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 20:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZPA-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 20:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello my friend! Can you update the all cast of Batang Quiapo? thanks! PurpleGirl Yedda ( talk) 01:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Superastig! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC) |
![]() |
Dear Superastig/Archive 7,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 13:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Belated happy anniversary in Wikipedia! As of recent, I noticed that a lot of radio/TV station articles have been sent to the AfD, including a couple of my creations, and ended up with "redirect" as their consensus. SBKSPP ( talk) 01:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello could you plls remove the lock for the Wikipedia page of ( Miss La Union I need to edit something thank you. Agri-tista5q ( talk) 05:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Dear Superastig!
I would like to fix or edit the article for DYAC-FM broadcasting history because I really need to rephrased a couple of sentences about the transfer of Brigada News FM Cebu's operations to 90.7 MHz from the former frequency, 93.1 MHz.
According to DJ Paul Gee that announced on May 13, 2023, I've already heard and/or seen the video of Rigor Mortiz's YT channel regarding Brigada News FM Cebu was conducted a test broadcast on 90.7 FM from 9pm to 7am the next day and from 1-3pm starting last May 15 of the same year, conincides with the transfer of it's broadcast facilities and offices to V. Rama Ave., Brgy. Guadalupe (near Nissan), until final sign-off of Q Radio Cebu on this frequency at midnight of June 17.
Please don't revert it because I'd like to edit or fix the history of Brigada News FM Cebu's transition to this frequency for the last chance. Thank you very much and God bless you always! ImlinaAbanato1995 ( talk) 11:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The redirect
Chicks on the Right has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Chicks on the Right until a consensus is reached.
Star
Mississippi
18:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I've noticed you keep changing [1] [2] the translation for "Ang Pinili ni Jordan" for NO given reason, which is obvious "The Choice of Jordan" in English language. Do you really want this to escalate again, by bringing administrators/editors for a simple translation? Hotwiki ( talk) 11:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanna post ratings of TV shows? Thing is I don't know where to find them aside from FB or Twitter. Can you help me? Thank you. Kutsero ( talk) 03:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " DYPH-FM".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hi. There was no consensus to merge. The policy based responses were to delete. Please reconsider and revert your close. Onel5969 TT me 15:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of 21 High Street Doha. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Onel5969 TT me 19:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hey, I think you made the wrong call in closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination) given that keep !voters were never able to substantiate an actual case for how notability guidelines were met (as well as the prevalence of SPA IPs on the keep side). I'd ask you to reconsider your decision to NAC the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Badnaseeb. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. signed, Rosguill talk 02:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hey, Superastig. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hi, I've undone your close of this AfD. For the rationale, see the relist comment. The BLP1E argument came late in the discussion, but merits to be addressed. -- Randykitty ( talk) 15:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Superastig non-admin AfD closes. Thank you. To be clear, I have proposed to topic ban you from closing AfDs.
Flatscan (
talk)
05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Tough luck bud. I'm kinda disappointed with the outcomes of those 2 DRVs. What you received was a double kill, make that triple kill because someone reported you to the AN. SBKSPP ( talk) 23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
disregard opinions and comments if they feel that there is strong evidence that they were not made in good faith. Such "bad faith" opinions include those being made by sock puppets, or accounts created solely for voting on the deletion discussion.That AfD had two IPs geolocating to the same place, making the same poorly-supported arguments with the same glaring English deficits, and had already been flagged as SPAs. It should not take someone else formally tagging them as socks for you to recognize they needed to be discounted (not to mention their arguments were strongly rebutted). You also closed three AfDs after participants had been blocked for socking, including one where a sock's !vote had already been struck. If you can't identify obvious bad-faith !voting you should not be closing dicussions. JoelleJay ( talk) 22:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
You also closed three AfDs after participants had been blocked for socking, including one where a sock's !vote had already been struck.:
Hi.
I have a question for you.
Why have you not engaged in the Administrators' noticeboard discussion concerning your AfD closures?
I now have this talk page on my watchlist.
I look forward to your response. - jc37 06:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Following my closure of this discussion at WP:AN, I am informing you that you are now subject to an topic ban, restricting you from closing AfD discussions. You may still take part in those discussions as a regular contributor, but you may no longer close them. The restriction is indefinite, but may be appealed at AN no sooner than six months from today. This restriction is recorded at WP:EDRC. Thank you. Girth Summit (blether) 12:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fatih Mehmet Gul. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. signed, Rosguill talk 18:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Superastig. I want to apologize for reverting your edits, I have read the MOS already, however, some things are still not yet clear to me. Is there a explicit statement in the MOS regarding the sub-section headers? If there is none, what is the reason why shouldn't put headers like "People related..."? Again, my apologies. Thank you! - jampol 08:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:VOP Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:31, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I just want to ask is you know the new radio station in Baguio 106.5 MHz? I just observed this station two months ago and I cannot determine the stations name and format until now. As of today, the station has no bumpers. SeanJ 2007 ( talk) 14:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I was surprised to see this article got redirected to its deletion. Last time I checked, it's the only Marist school article that got deleted. Is it because it's a school in the Philippines? I digress. Anyway, I was active in editing this article in my other account years ago (now in hiatus). Though a year late already, I disagree with the decision so I might make a draft of it in my Sandbox. I can't disagree though if I can't see the argument against the deletion though. I can access books and news articles supporting its notability like I did in the other school articles I edited. Hard to find articles on the school since it gets buried along with the other "Marist". Anyway, let me know if I can still help recover the article, make a draft on a sandbox to bring it back, or just let it stay redirected to its non-existence. Peace! — Brother Allen ( talk) 13:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
got redirected to its deletion. There are other types of consensus aside from "delete". I closed it as "redirect" not because it's from the Philippines (that's an invalid argument per WP:ATA), but because it fails WP:NSCHOOL based on the consensus in the deletion discussion. We follow policy-based arguments when it comes to such deletion discussion.
Hi, Superastig!
I'm so sorry for that because I wanted to trying added or edited the pages or articles for some Brigada News FM stations in General Santos, Olongapo and Zamboanga that are licensed to Baycomms Broadcasting Corporation without any permission, which already mentioned in that infobox for it's stations.
I hope that I decided to stay longer as a wikipedia user that I created a new one, but next time I will try my best to edit, added or fix information in each articles.
Thank you so much! 😊 Jemz2023 ( talk) 09:31, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXNG-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 09:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is:
112.200.9.54 and perpetuating hoaxes?.
LilianaUwU (
talk /
contributions)
17:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
thanks for editing the dzlc cool fm!
Jairus Cambiado Ezekiel ( talk) 05:30, 28 May 2023 (UTC) |
Regarding to your revert on
Special:Diff/1159739033, the station already exists. The station already has a FB page (
facebook
The article Ben Balasador has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NFILM. Citations are about the actors, except the book...which may or may not contain an depth review.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
02:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, where is the source that 105.1 Baguio will be simulcast Brigada Korondal? ThisIsSeanJ ( talk) 01:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello @ Superastig, you are now engaged in an edit war with me on the Ang Syota Kong Balikbayan page. I have explained to you why I reverted your edits. You are in contravention of WP:BRD. After an editor undoes your edit, you are meant to discuss the issue on the talk page, not continually revert back. Your argument so far has been to reference a previous editor's changes, which I supposedly left in place, with the contention that this somehow justifies your changes to remain in place. This is false, as the two are not related. You have introduced erroneous terminology into the article—title role—even though I explained that it is not applicable. Additionally, you have made the claim that imdb is verified, which is ridiculous, since it is a user-generated database. You need to stop this conflict and start engaging in a discussion, before this matter requires escalating into a noticeboard dispute. Revirvlkodlaku ( talk) 12:57, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
because so far, all you've done is revert: How were my contributions considered reverting when, in fact, I mostly made changes in the cast listing? Common sense, men.
Per consensus emerging at ANI ( link) regarding your persistent and egregious WP:OWN violations and other behavioural issues, I have indefinitely blocked your account from editing.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel ( talk) 04:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Superastig ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There are times when I have day-offs from Wikipedia at least once a week. Now that I came from my day-off yesterday, I was shocked to see that I'm blocked. I've read the recent replies in my appeal and I admit that I've gone way too far with losing my cool and creating a battleground, just like what happened in Ang Syota Kong Balikbayan, with this affecting my behavior, and I realized that I should not persist on my edits whenever I'm wrong in certain aspects. I apologize. Outside those issues, several of my other edits were done in good faith and in peace, like episode updates of every TV show and creating articles. I've been also reverting disruptive edits from various IP users several times. And I don't want my recent behavior to overshadow my said contributions in Wikipedia. I hope I'll be unblocked. And I'll do my best to be careful with my behavior and tone down my replies this time around. ASTIG 😎 🙃 01:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First of all, I'm rooting for you, because indeed you have done a lot of good here, and I have seen how much you care about this project. The main reason you were blocked was because of OWNership behavior. Please review it more carefully. You also should not OWN an article even whenever you're "right" in certain aspects. Or even most aspects. Barring vandalism, we have dispute resolution if you feel another's edits are not improving the article. Yes, you need to keep your cool, yes you need to avoid battleground behavior. But you'll need to show a better understanding of the OWN policy before you are unblocked. My recommendation is to try to reflect and figure out what motivates the OWNership reaction in the first place. I truly hope that is helpful. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 03:19, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello,
I realise this might feel either somewhat like piling on, but as I think you a likely individual to be unblocked and there was clear community consensus, there were other community consensuses to implement.
The most core of which is a 6 month moratorium from appealing your TBAN on AfD closes. The close can be seen here. I'll also add it to the list shortly. There was affirmative community consensus not to implement a more general AfD TBAN. Nosebagbear ( talk) 12:16, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Superastig ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Per WP:OWN, no one has the right to claim a certain article as their own. Whoever creates a certain article does not mean they own it. Every editor has the right to make changes to that article and, if ever any part of the article questioned, anyone can discuss it in the article's talk page to seek consensus. I realized that my recent involvement in editing Ang Syota Kong Balikbayan is a clear example of WP:OWN, where I went way too far with losing my cool and created a battleground. (No. 6 of WP:OWNBEHAVIOR) I acted as if I own the article by persisting with my edits. And blaming the reverter will not solve the problem. I apologize for such. The next time an editor reverts any of my edits in a certain article for a valid reason, I'll discuss in good faith regarding my edits in the article's talk page and respect whatever consensus we will reach. If I can't find a valid reason for my edits to be restored, instead of boldly standing by my edits and engaging in an edit war, I'll leave the article as is and respect the decision of the reverter. This is how toned down I'll be whenever I encounter such reversion this time around. ASTIG 😎 🙃 00:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Per the discussion with respect to stipulations and existing topic bans, and with the agreement below of the blocking admin. Superastig, don't hesitate to be in touch with any questions or clarifications. Star Mississippi 12:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Astig, last time there's a edit war on Eat Bulaga and the username is Jumark27. He even reverted and change content as he owns the article as per WP:OWN. Maybe you have to report to the administrators. I know you're not involved in it but I'm just telling you about happening last time. Please take your time to response this. Thank you Astig! Rhianna543 ( talk) 06:55, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Centerstage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2020
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
DonaldD23
talk to me
22:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Papunta Ka Pa Lang, Pabalik Na Ako, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papunta Ka Pa Lang, Pabalik Na Ako.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig. Thank you for your work on Talahib at Rosas. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 16:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Superastig, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! œ ™ 08:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
The article WJDI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet the WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Let'srun (
talk)
03:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Why are you removing coming of age and thriller on genre in the info box. Abs cbn entertainment article said coming of age. Other official sources say mystery thriller so it shouldn’t be removed. 120.28.249.22 ( talk) 15:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I heard you've been doing this episode update task for a very long time. I hope you don't mind if I have a chat with you here.
We all know that kapit sa patalim literally means holding on to a knife's blade, but it's generaly means taking a risk. Apologies for not inserting translations, but I believe everyone agrees that kapit sa patalim really means taking a risk. There's no need for sources about it. What bothers me is that HW reverted my edit on Lovers / Liars yesterday. I plan to bring back what's right, but NVM.
And why did HW escalate this issue about the kapit sa patalim into the reference used in episode updates? Ever since I started doing episode update task, I haven't received such useless warning until yesterday. They seem to act as if they're right. Kutsero ( talk) 03:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYHH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYDD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 19:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWIM-AM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 20:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DZPA-FM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.MarioGom ( talk) 20:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello my friend! Can you update the all cast of Batang Quiapo? thanks! PurpleGirl Yedda ( talk) 01:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Superastig! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 02:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC) |
![]() |
Dear Superastig/Archive 7,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 13:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Belated happy anniversary in Wikipedia! As of recent, I noticed that a lot of radio/TV station articles have been sent to the AfD, including a couple of my creations, and ended up with "redirect" as their consensus. SBKSPP ( talk) 01:13, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello could you plls remove the lock for the Wikipedia page of ( Miss La Union I need to edit something thank you. Agri-tista5q ( talk) 05:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Dear Superastig!
I would like to fix or edit the article for DYAC-FM broadcasting history because I really need to rephrased a couple of sentences about the transfer of Brigada News FM Cebu's operations to 90.7 MHz from the former frequency, 93.1 MHz.
According to DJ Paul Gee that announced on May 13, 2023, I've already heard and/or seen the video of Rigor Mortiz's YT channel regarding Brigada News FM Cebu was conducted a test broadcast on 90.7 FM from 9pm to 7am the next day and from 1-3pm starting last May 15 of the same year, conincides with the transfer of it's broadcast facilities and offices to V. Rama Ave., Brgy. Guadalupe (near Nissan), until final sign-off of Q Radio Cebu on this frequency at midnight of June 17.
Please don't revert it because I'd like to edit or fix the history of Brigada News FM Cebu's transition to this frequency for the last chance. Thank you very much and God bless you always! ImlinaAbanato1995 ( talk) 11:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
The redirect
Chicks on the Right has been listed at
redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 1 § Chicks on the Right until a consensus is reached.
Star
Mississippi
18:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I've noticed you keep changing [1] [2] the translation for "Ang Pinili ni Jordan" for NO given reason, which is obvious "The Choice of Jordan" in English language. Do you really want this to escalate again, by bringing administrators/editors for a simple translation? Hotwiki ( talk) 11:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
I wanna post ratings of TV shows? Thing is I don't know where to find them aside from FB or Twitter. Can you help me? Thank you. Kutsero ( talk) 03:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Superastig. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " DYPH-FM".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)