Welcome!
Hello, Stolengood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
billinghurst (
talk)
16:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm including you in this talkback as you were one of the main editors in the revert war, and in hope that we can sort this situation out without a block. Random Time 12:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:Heath Ledger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --
Collectonian (
talk ·
contribs)
04:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
His name was Robertson, not Robinson. His later projects are credited to Robertson, not Robinson. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
Atlantis, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
Dougweller (
talk)
00:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films, you may be
blocked from editing.
magnius (
talk)
17:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as
this edit you made to
List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice. –
Tommy
message
17:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to
List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Unless there is a reliable source stating that The End of Time incorporated parts of the Final Game an encyclopedia can't make that statement. Indeed you can't even compare the similarities without a source, to do so would be
synthesis. Thank you.
Maccy69 (
talk)
22:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources, as you did to
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk)
13:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk)
08:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NickAdams Killers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an
edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to
Christopher Marlowe. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for
vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.
Tim PF (
talk)
Please also note that literary works, such as epic poems, go in italics (per WP:MOSITALICS). Tim PF ( talk) 16:34, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have noticed you've added that Graham's original 2010 episode slot was replaced by "Amy's Choice", but the source you site does not say that it was replaced by "Amy's Choice", only that he originally planned to write for the 2010 series. Therefore, I have removed this info as it would be original research. I apologize that my edit summary for "Amy's Choice" was not complete, as I hit the enter key bu accident. Regards, Glimmer721 talk 01:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
I've noticed you've added the months when each production block in Doctor Who's fifth series was filmed; do you know what source you got the info from? I would like to keep the info in the article, but I need a source for it. Thanks, Glimmer721 talk 00:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Some of your uploads have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
...William
02:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Brilliant. -- Ring Cinema ( talk) 00:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Battle Hymn of the Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Kimball ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Brown's Body, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Kimball ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The No Spam Barnstar |
Good Job Austin56713 00:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doctor Who (series 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Power of Three ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Don't edit war ( [2], [3]) with another editor over the contents of his userpage. If Phil doesn't want to keep his statement posted on his userpage, it is not within your remit to force him to do so. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 16:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
It isn't often you'll find a stranger to defend your edits from an (unusually aggressive) editor, let alone one who thanks you for making the effort anyway. TinyTedDanson ( talk) 00:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 01:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am currently attempting to get Greed (film) promoted to FA status and thought that you may be interested in it.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 01:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I found my scan and have uploaded it here. I'd love to have it included in the Dream a Little Dream of Me page, but I can't figure out how to keep it from getting deleted. Proscriptus ( talk) 13:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi there; I undid your edit to Template:Nerva–Antonine family tree, but I wanted to explain why so you'll understand this isn't a hostile gesture or anything. Roman praenomina have conventional abbreviations that are not always the same as the first letter; Gaius is abbreviated as "C.", Caeso as "K.", Gnaeus as "Cn.", etc. This is particularly salient with Tiberius: "T." means "Titus", while "Ti." (or sometimes "Tib.") means "Tiberius". Although this is a Latin convention, it's also followed in English works on ancient Romans. The article praenomen has many juicy details on the subject if you're interested. All the best, Q·L· 1968 ☿ 16:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent help at WP:Selected anniversaries. I undid your edit on January 14 because of two reasons. Firstly, Tito was previously ineligible, but was improved upon and I like to give preference to articles that were recently improved as a sort of reward/thank you to the editors that cleaned it up, and I didn't use that article last year. Because it's the 40th anniversary of Lesley Whittle, that meant Bodyline had to be the one moved out in order to maintain chronological diversity. Secondly, you deleted Queen Maud Land and MiG-17, while putting Margrethe back into the Ineligible section. — howcheng { chat} 09:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Putting Wilson Bentley back in makes too many U.S items listed. As much as possible, you need to maintain diversity in chronology, geographic location, and topic. With U.S. topics being represented by the 200th and 150th anniversary items, Bentley had to make way. Sorry. — howcheng { chat} 09:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! You mentioned in your last edit to Template:Nerva–Antonine family tree that P. Acilius Attianus "DID practically adopt Hadrian with Plotina". Adoption was a big deal in the Roman world: you didn't just take somebody in, they became absolutely legally your child, they took your name, they joined your tribe and social order, they forfeited their old place in the line of inheritance, etc. After Trajan's (alleged) deathbed adoption of Hadrian, the latter became Imp. Caesar Divi Traiani filius Traianus Hadrianus Augustus (‘Emperor Caesar, son of the divine Trajan, Trajan Hadrian Augustus’): the names Acilius and Attianus appear nowhere in his titulature, and Hadrian didn't openly acknowledge Attianus as a parent. So we can't say that Attianus adopted Hadrian, at least not in any sense the Romans would accept as such... Q·L· 1968 ☿ 19:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Maybe should have just taken the hint.
I'm not sure why you chose to put all that stuff back in when I compromised and kept some of your stuff, but here is a breakdown of why I've reverted some of your changes:
Honestly, most of your changes seem intended to get the word count down just enough to put that bloated epilogue back in again, and it's fairly obvious. It's double the length of the existing thing and adds nothing not essential. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Did you add an edit-warring report and then delete it with no edit summary? That is likely to draw suspicion. In the future, use an edit summary. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Furious 7. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet ( talk) 13:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Would you please share your source information for making James Smithson's birthdate June 5, 1765? Thank you. 2604:2000:F1E5:3A00:E9A7:BFF9:C9B9:1DF5 ( talk) 12:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello I am re-instating this question and changing the edit back. What is the proof you have for this birthdate June 5? If it is the Ewing biography footnote, that gives no such proof. Please do not revert the change unless you can add a footnote showing where you got June 5, 1765 from. Thank you.
I am the author of that book and I spent six years in the archives in multiple countries and did not find a birthdate for Smithson. I assure you, it is not in the Ewing biography! 184.75.9.2 ( talk) 20:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
I get it — you don't like Bob Kane. But you can't make partisan, highly contentious edits that contradict the established historical record, which gives both men credit. Now that these POV edits have been reverted, please follow WP:BRD and discuss on the appropriate talk pages rather than edit-war. If you want to do an RfC, you can do that as well. But the vast majority of books and articles on Batman, Kane and Finger credit both of them together. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Betty Logan. Your recent edit to the page
List of highest-grossing films appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Betty Logan (
talk)
21:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Geoffrey Chaucer may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of works published posthumously, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Road Runner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit on
List of works published posthumously concerning
Charles Laughton in
Advise & Consent did not appear to be relevant to the article so I deleted the information; please see
WP:TOPIC. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Hitcher vs. Candyman (
talk)
03:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Palaces, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlo Rossi and Charles Cameron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Tom Reedy ( talk) 03:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Charles Laughton. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 17:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
How exactly is this PD? The image page claims that it was first published outside the US before 1923, but that can't possibly be true because Steamboat Willie was released in 1928 by the Walt Disney Co. in the United States. If you can justify the public domain status, then by all means let's use it, but I don't think you can. I'm fairly certain there are no films created by Disney that are PD. After all, US copyright law was specifically amended to extend the length of copyright protection to benefit Disney and other film studios. As such, I'm taking the pic back out and adding to WP:PUF. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 22:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Shaw University is not eligible for inclusion due to the orange-level maintenance tag. I know it wasn't there when you did the edit because I added it. One part of the job is vetting the articles to make sure they are of good enough quality to be featured. Also, don't put in 6 items because that will make OTD too long and throw off the left-right balance of the Main Page. Finally, you need to add the notes on the talk page. — howcheng { chat} 08:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The reason I pulled Granma (yacht) out is that next year it will be its 60th anniversary, so it will get preference for inclusion, and if it's on this year that will mean it gets 3 years in a row. However, taking Enron out was fine because I didn't notice there were so many US items. If it were me now, I would replace Granma with Benazir Bhutto or Napoleon III, but I will leave it up to you. Please make sure you update the notes on the talk page when you're done. — howcheng { chat} 16:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Reed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 01:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
petulia - i know the film quite well - but the doubling up of the cast list in the second para and then list below is a bit disconcerting and needs to be cleaned up - you have a pref of which we move out? cheers JarrahTree 09:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
A corrosive look at the American upper-middle-class and the fragmentation of American society, "Petulia" is one of the great, if unheralded, American films. Propelled by the luminous presence of Julie Christie and the powerhouse performance of George C. Scott, "Petulia" was a success at the box office, although some critics were upset over the blackness of the comedy. It was to prove to be his last great film awks, and he is still alive in his mid 80s... JarrahTree 09:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
What a shame since he tried to protect the Cherokees which says a lot about him. By the way, where did you learn about Erysipelas as a course of his death? I am talking about your recent edit at [4]. -- Taterian ( talk) 06:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Stolengood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PVZCK.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 08:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Commander in Chief (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dee Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
In June 2010, you were asked not to mark changes that alter content as "minor". Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits as defined at Help:Minor edit, i.e. typographical corrections, formatting changes, reversion of clear-cut vandalism or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Any edit that modifies, adds, or removes content is not "minor". Thank you. DrKay ( talk) 18:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
V for Vendetta (film), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
04:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Template:Chad Stahelski and David Leitch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Don Cuan ( talk) 06:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but her article is not eligible for inclusion in Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/June 7 because there is a section tagged as needing additional references. Please see WP:OTDRULES for more info. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 17:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, do you have a reliable source for your claim that Mr. Kilbride and Ralf Belmont were partners? I was doing a quick research on the internet and couldn't find anything ... Thanks, -- Clibenfoart ( talk) 16:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, So a lot of your edits are not accurate or change the meaning of sentences. For instance, are you adding "near-total" because of a specific source or because its your opinion? Abe Lehr was the head of the studio and, as stated in the body of the article, took a hands off approach while Thalberg was directly involved in the making of the film and was a producer. The source specifically called the studio "The Goldwyn Company", so it should stay that way even if the Wikipedia article reflects a different name (names constantly changed at this time). I'm also not sure why you are doing so much CE for a FA article with several copy edits. For instance, changing During the making of Greed to After the making of Greed is historically inaccurate and contradicted by the cited body of the article. I respectfully ask you to not revert cited material.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 16:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, are you definitely using the source that is already in the article (Lennig) for the addition of the info regarding John Emerson? Also, you really are mistaken about the Lehr/Thalberg thing.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 02:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Stolengood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greed (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Israel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Frobisher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Luttrell ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara La Marr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vamp ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of works published posthumously shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron IV 18:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara La Marr, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rex Ingram and Gothic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Do you have a source that Kilbride was gay? Nothing shows through an online search. Ralf Belmont's IMDb page even says that he had a wife, who died in 1947. You claim they got together in 1946. And, again, an online search shows nothing. Everything I can find says they were friends, but mentions nothing about being romantic partners.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strangers of the Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Holt ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I had to undo your edit here, as your version was far too long. We don't have to give all the details in the blurb. Just enough to get pique the reader's interest. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 01:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Wickedjacob (
talk)
09:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Guy (
Help!)
15:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Hello, Stolengood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Files for discussion notices from files or remove other people's comments in
Files for discussion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of a file, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
04:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HeathLedger Clerkenwell2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mélencron. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
Mélencron (
talk)
03:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Mélencron (
talk)
21:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you added William McKinley to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 14. He was already listed on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 6, although the link was not in bold, so I removed it from the 14th and made it bold on the 6th. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 16:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
05:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Stolengood ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I realize I should not have put a non-free image in the template, but I was trying to feature it with a relevant image -- I couldn't find a non-free one. I should have just not tried to have the image go with the anniversary I put in, the image being non-free. I'm sorry for screwing that up; I won't put a non-free image into a main page template again.
Decline reason:
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla ( talk) 10:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I think you also need to explain why you were edit-warring at that page. [8] DrKay ( talk) 17:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Stolengood ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Copyright is the exclusive right given to the creator of a creative work to reproduce that work; however, it is subject to limitations, such as fair use. Wikipedia is licenced under several different licences, but using copyrighted content without prior permission of its creator/owner could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia; if you want to use copyrighted content, you must contact its creator/owner. Otherwise, it is better to create for Wikipedia copyrighted content yourself that can be used on Wikipedia without any legal trouble. I intend to carefully make sure any content or creative work I post on Wikipedia in the future is either in the public domain or falls under the licences needed for it to be used on Wikipedia; if it does not, I will not use it under any circumstances. Stolengood ( talk) 13:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You did not identify the licenses for Wikipedia content. Also, just contacting the creator/owner of copyrighted work is entirely insufficient. Additionally, you seem to have completely missed WP:FAIRUSE. Yamla ( talk) 14:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The file File:C. Aubrey Smith color.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The file File:George Arliss color1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MilosMilos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Stolengood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
billinghurst (
talk)
16:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm including you in this talkback as you were one of the main editors in the revert war, and in hope that we can sort this situation out without a block. Random Time 12:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Template:Heath Ledger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --
Collectonian (
talk ·
contribs)
04:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
His name was Robertson, not Robinson. His later projects are credited to Robertson, not Robinson. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:23, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
Atlantis, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
Dougweller (
talk)
00:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films, you may be
blocked from editing.
magnius (
talk)
17:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as
this edit you made to
List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing without further notice. –
Tommy
message
17:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to
List of unmade Doctor Who serials and films. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Unless there is a reliable source stating that The End of Time incorporated parts of the Final Game an encyclopedia can't make that statement. Indeed you can't even compare the similarities without a source, to do so would be
synthesis. Thank you.
Maccy69 (
talk)
22:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources, as you did to
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. Before making any potentially controversial
edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk)
13:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --
Doniago (
talk)
08:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NickAdams Killers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an
edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to
Christopher Marlowe. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for
vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.
Tim PF (
talk)
Please also note that literary works, such as epic poems, go in italics (per WP:MOSITALICS). Tim PF ( talk) 16:34, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have noticed you've added that Graham's original 2010 episode slot was replaced by "Amy's Choice", but the source you site does not say that it was replaced by "Amy's Choice", only that he originally planned to write for the 2010 series. Therefore, I have removed this info as it would be original research. I apologize that my edit summary for "Amy's Choice" was not complete, as I hit the enter key bu accident. Regards, Glimmer721 talk 01:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
I've noticed you've added the months when each production block in Doctor Who's fifth series was filmed; do you know what source you got the info from? I would like to keep the info in the article, but I need a source for it. Thanks, Glimmer721 talk 00:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Some of your uploads have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
...William
02:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Brilliant. -- Ring Cinema ( talk) 00:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Battle Hymn of the Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Kimball ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Brown's Body, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Kimball ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The No Spam Barnstar |
Good Job Austin56713 00:59, 3 May 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doctor Who (series 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Power of Three ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Don't edit war ( [2], [3]) with another editor over the contents of his userpage. If Phil doesn't want to keep his statement posted on his userpage, it is not within your remit to force him to do so. TenOfAllTrades( talk) 16:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
It isn't often you'll find a stranger to defend your edits from an (unusually aggressive) editor, let alone one who thanks you for making the effort anyway. TinyTedDanson ( talk) 00:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 01:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am currently attempting to get Greed (film) promoted to FA status and thought that you may be interested in it.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 01:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I found my scan and have uploaded it here. I'd love to have it included in the Dream a Little Dream of Me page, but I can't figure out how to keep it from getting deleted. Proscriptus ( talk) 13:08, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi there; I undid your edit to Template:Nerva–Antonine family tree, but I wanted to explain why so you'll understand this isn't a hostile gesture or anything. Roman praenomina have conventional abbreviations that are not always the same as the first letter; Gaius is abbreviated as "C.", Caeso as "K.", Gnaeus as "Cn.", etc. This is particularly salient with Tiberius: "T." means "Titus", while "Ti." (or sometimes "Tib.") means "Tiberius". Although this is a Latin convention, it's also followed in English works on ancient Romans. The article praenomen has many juicy details on the subject if you're interested. All the best, Q·L· 1968 ☿ 16:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent help at WP:Selected anniversaries. I undid your edit on January 14 because of two reasons. Firstly, Tito was previously ineligible, but was improved upon and I like to give preference to articles that were recently improved as a sort of reward/thank you to the editors that cleaned it up, and I didn't use that article last year. Because it's the 40th anniversary of Lesley Whittle, that meant Bodyline had to be the one moved out in order to maintain chronological diversity. Secondly, you deleted Queen Maud Land and MiG-17, while putting Margrethe back into the Ineligible section. — howcheng { chat} 09:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Putting Wilson Bentley back in makes too many U.S items listed. As much as possible, you need to maintain diversity in chronology, geographic location, and topic. With U.S. topics being represented by the 200th and 150th anniversary items, Bentley had to make way. Sorry. — howcheng { chat} 09:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there! You mentioned in your last edit to Template:Nerva–Antonine family tree that P. Acilius Attianus "DID practically adopt Hadrian with Plotina". Adoption was a big deal in the Roman world: you didn't just take somebody in, they became absolutely legally your child, they took your name, they joined your tribe and social order, they forfeited their old place in the line of inheritance, etc. After Trajan's (alleged) deathbed adoption of Hadrian, the latter became Imp. Caesar Divi Traiani filius Traianus Hadrianus Augustus (‘Emperor Caesar, son of the divine Trajan, Trajan Hadrian Augustus’): the names Acilius and Attianus appear nowhere in his titulature, and Hadrian didn't openly acknowledge Attianus as a parent. So we can't say that Attianus adopted Hadrian, at least not in any sense the Romans would accept as such... Q·L· 1968 ☿ 19:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Maybe should have just taken the hint.
I'm not sure why you chose to put all that stuff back in when I compromised and kept some of your stuff, but here is a breakdown of why I've reverted some of your changes:
Honestly, most of your changes seem intended to get the word count down just enough to put that bloated epilogue back in again, and it's fairly obvious. It's double the length of the existing thing and adds nothing not essential. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 21:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Did you add an edit-warring report and then delete it with no edit summary? That is likely to draw suspicion. In the future, use an edit summary. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Furious 7. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet ( talk) 13:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello Would you please share your source information for making James Smithson's birthdate June 5, 1765? Thank you. 2604:2000:F1E5:3A00:E9A7:BFF9:C9B9:1DF5 ( talk) 12:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello I am re-instating this question and changing the edit back. What is the proof you have for this birthdate June 5? If it is the Ewing biography footnote, that gives no such proof. Please do not revert the change unless you can add a footnote showing where you got June 5, 1765 from. Thank you.
I am the author of that book and I spent six years in the archives in multiple countries and did not find a birthdate for Smithson. I assure you, it is not in the Ewing biography! 184.75.9.2 ( talk) 20:45, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
I get it — you don't like Bob Kane. But you can't make partisan, highly contentious edits that contradict the established historical record, which gives both men credit. Now that these POV edits have been reverted, please follow WP:BRD and discuss on the appropriate talk pages rather than edit-war. If you want to do an RfC, you can do that as well. But the vast majority of books and articles on Batman, Kane and Finger credit both of them together. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 00:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Betty Logan. Your recent edit to the page
List of highest-grossing films appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Betty Logan (
talk)
21:20, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Geoffrey Chaucer may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of works published posthumously, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Road Runner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Your recent edit on
List of works published posthumously concerning
Charles Laughton in
Advise & Consent did not appear to be relevant to the article so I deleted the information; please see
WP:TOPIC. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Hitcher vs. Candyman (
talk)
03:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Palaces, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlo Rossi and Charles Cameron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see this discussion. Tom Reedy ( talk) 03:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Charles Laughton. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 17:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
How exactly is this PD? The image page claims that it was first published outside the US before 1923, but that can't possibly be true because Steamboat Willie was released in 1928 by the Walt Disney Co. in the United States. If you can justify the public domain status, then by all means let's use it, but I don't think you can. I'm fairly certain there are no films created by Disney that are PD. After all, US copyright law was specifically amended to extend the length of copyright protection to benefit Disney and other film studios. As such, I'm taking the pic back out and adding to WP:PUF. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 22:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Shaw University is not eligible for inclusion due to the orange-level maintenance tag. I know it wasn't there when you did the edit because I added it. One part of the job is vetting the articles to make sure they are of good enough quality to be featured. Also, don't put in 6 items because that will make OTD too long and throw off the left-right balance of the Main Page. Finally, you need to add the notes on the talk page. — howcheng { chat} 08:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The reason I pulled Granma (yacht) out is that next year it will be its 60th anniversary, so it will get preference for inclusion, and if it's on this year that will mean it gets 3 years in a row. However, taking Enron out was fine because I didn't notice there were so many US items. If it were me now, I would replace Granma with Benazir Bhutto or Napoleon III, but I will leave it up to you. Please make sure you update the notes on the talk page when you're done. — howcheng { chat} 16:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Universal Monsters Cinematic Universe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Reed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing, as you did at
List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Your edits have been or will be
reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 ( talk) 01:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
petulia - i know the film quite well - but the doubling up of the cast list in the second para and then list below is a bit disconcerting and needs to be cleaned up - you have a pref of which we move out? cheers JarrahTree 09:15, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
A corrosive look at the American upper-middle-class and the fragmentation of American society, "Petulia" is one of the great, if unheralded, American films. Propelled by the luminous presence of Julie Christie and the powerhouse performance of George C. Scott, "Petulia" was a success at the box office, although some critics were upset over the blackness of the comedy. It was to prove to be his last great film awks, and he is still alive in his mid 80s... JarrahTree 09:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
What a shame since he tried to protect the Cherokees which says a lot about him. By the way, where did you learn about Erysipelas as a course of his death? I am talking about your recent edit at [4]. -- Taterian ( talk) 06:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Stolengood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:PVZCK.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 08:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Commander in Chief (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dee Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
In June 2010, you were asked not to mark changes that alter content as "minor". Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits as defined at Help:Minor edit, i.e. typographical corrections, formatting changes, reversion of clear-cut vandalism or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Any edit that modifies, adds, or removes content is not "minor". Thank you. DrKay ( talk) 18:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
V for Vendetta (film), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
04:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Template:Chad Stahelski and David Leitch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Don Cuan ( talk) 06:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but her article is not eligible for inclusion in Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/June 7 because there is a section tagged as needing additional references. Please see WP:OTDRULES for more info. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 17:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, do you have a reliable source for your claim that Mr. Kilbride and Ralf Belmont were partners? I was doing a quick research on the internet and couldn't find anything ... Thanks, -- Clibenfoart ( talk) 16:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, So a lot of your edits are not accurate or change the meaning of sentences. For instance, are you adding "near-total" because of a specific source or because its your opinion? Abe Lehr was the head of the studio and, as stated in the body of the article, took a hands off approach while Thalberg was directly involved in the making of the film and was a producer. The source specifically called the studio "The Goldwyn Company", so it should stay that way even if the Wikipedia article reflects a different name (names constantly changed at this time). I'm also not sure why you are doing so much CE for a FA article with several copy edits. For instance, changing During the making of Greed to After the making of Greed is historically inaccurate and contradicted by the cited body of the article. I respectfully ask you to not revert cited material.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 16:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, are you definitely using the source that is already in the article (Lennig) for the addition of the info regarding John Emerson? Also, you really are mistaken about the Lehr/Thalberg thing.-- Deoliveirafan ( talk) 02:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Stolengood. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greed (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Israel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Frobisher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Luttrell ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara La Marr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vamp ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of works published posthumously shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron IV 18:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara La Marr, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rex Ingram and Gothic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Do you have a source that Kilbride was gay? Nothing shows through an online search. Ralf Belmont's IMDb page even says that he had a wife, who died in 1947. You claim they got together in 1946. And, again, an online search shows nothing. Everything I can find says they were friends, but mentions nothing about being romantic partners.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strangers of the Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1923 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Holt ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:11, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I had to undo your edit here, as your version was far too long. We don't have to give all the details in the blurb. Just enough to get pique the reader's interest. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 01:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Wickedjacob (
talk)
09:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Guy (
Help!)
15:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Hello, Stolengood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Files for discussion notices from files or remove other people's comments in
Files for discussion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of a file, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --
Marchjuly (
talk)
04:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HeathLedger Clerkenwell2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mélencron. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
help desk. Thanks.
Mélencron (
talk)
03:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Mélencron (
talk)
21:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you added William McKinley to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 14. He was already listed on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/September 6, although the link was not in bold, so I removed it from the 14th and made it bold on the 6th. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 16:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
05:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Stolengood ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I realize I should not have put a non-free image in the template, but I was trying to feature it with a relevant image -- I couldn't find a non-free one. I should have just not tried to have the image go with the anniversary I put in, the image being non-free. I'm sorry for screwing that up; I won't put a non-free image into a main page template again.
Decline reason:
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla ( talk) 10:48, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I think you also need to explain why you were edit-warring at that page. [8] DrKay ( talk) 17:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Stolengood ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Copyright is the exclusive right given to the creator of a creative work to reproduce that work; however, it is subject to limitations, such as fair use. Wikipedia is licenced under several different licences, but using copyrighted content without prior permission of its creator/owner could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia; if you want to use copyrighted content, you must contact its creator/owner. Otherwise, it is better to create for Wikipedia copyrighted content yourself that can be used on Wikipedia without any legal trouble. I intend to carefully make sure any content or creative work I post on Wikipedia in the future is either in the public domain or falls under the licences needed for it to be used on Wikipedia; if it does not, I will not use it under any circumstances. Stolengood ( talk) 13:46, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You did not identify the licenses for Wikipedia content. Also, just contacting the creator/owner of copyrighted work is entirely insufficient. Additionally, you seem to have completely missed WP:FAIRUSE. Yamla ( talk) 14:05, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The file File:C. Aubrey Smith color.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The file File:George Arliss color1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MilosMilos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)