Welcome!
Hello, Soni Ruchi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Sandstein 06:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. There is a DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 August 4 concerning the restoration of an userfied version of an article on whose AfD you commented. You may be better able to determine than I whether the concerns in the deletion nomination are met. Regards, Sandstein 06:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arsh Malsiani, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://publicationsdivision.nic.in/Lang-Pub/Kannada/LK01.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I have seen the referred website, there has been no infrigement of copyright. I have posted only the barest info. on the subject. Regards. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 10:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, do you have a source for this edit? Looks interesting. I've removed it temporarily, until a source is found. Regards, Shreevatsa ( talk) 20:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I had seen a report of this find in a past issue of The Times of India New Delhi edition. It was a reported that a cave inscription in Prakrit and Sanskrit had been found in Bhanpura Tehsil of Madhya Pradesh indicating Kalidasa to have lived during the time of Shibi Janpal 2nd or 1st century B. C. I thought this fact was well-known. I am now eagerly seeking the relevant details. I have appreciated your efforts.Regards. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 11:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, if you know the date of the TImes of India issue, it would help searching for the source. If true this would be big news, so I'm surprised I can't find any mentions of it on the internet. Regards, Shreevatsa ( talk) 13:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I am reverting to you on this subject after a long time. I am to submit that try hard I did I could not evoke any response from the Times of India or Archeological Survey of India. But I did notice an interesting post dated 08/03/2011 in Ancient Indians - Satya Samhita [ [1]] that reads -
"Kalidasa said that he started writing Jyotividaabharana in Vaisakha maasa of Kali 3068 which corresponds to 34 BCE."
What is your opinion? Do let me know. Regards. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 12:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Ruchi Ji,
First of all thank you for creating the page on my mother, I do intend to expand the page in coming weeks as and when time permits. There is a lot to be added about her literary life including her other books, collection of ghazals. The main problem is that I, shamefully so, cannot read Urdu. However now I do have some erratic help and hopefully this will be done soon. I presume you are Zia Fatehabadi sahab's granddaughter, I have a postcard from him to Ammi and picture of him with Ammi (and several others) taken sometime in late 70s. Am sure there must be a lot more but I don't know....
Regards, TariqueSani ( talk) 06:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Chzz
► 02:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
Chzz ► 02:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —
James (
Talk •
Contribs) • 8:47pm • 10:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)There is already an English Wikipedia page on that topic - Qat'aa. So, the best idea would be to edit that, and add to it, and improve it.
You could copy/paste from what you wrote in Wiktionary:qataa - but it's best if you do that yourself, instead of me - so that the history shows you wrote it.
Cheers, Chzz ► 05:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Chevy
monte
carlo 05:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC){{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Aaron Booth ( talk) 05:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravinder Kumar Soni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Kumar Soni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller ( talk) 12:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Have you read WP:RS? We can't use forums as sources. I see no evidence that Ravinder Kumar Soni meets our criteria either. If you disagree, you can ask at WP:RSN. Dougweller ( talk) 12:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Please don't put peacock words in articles, see WP:PEACOCK. This would include 'eminent'. Thanks (whenever I see those words, I think "someone wants me to think this person is important, but is he really?). Actions speak louder than words, as they say. Dougweller ( talk) 17:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi I noticed your comment at the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ravinder_Kumar_Soni. One of your articles Ravinder Kumar Soni was nominated for AfD, but don't be disheartened. This doesn't mean that fellow wikipedians don't value your efforts, but in this particular case they did not feel it was sufficiently notable. See the general requirements for the existence of wikipedia articles at the following link: WP:GNG. Reading up on this link can help you learn about what topics should exist on wikipedia. You might want to consult WP:RS about what sources should be used. IRWolfie- ( talk) 09:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zarina Sani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarina Sani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller ( talk) 06:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Soni Ruchi, to show notability you need to show what reliable sources there are on this topic and show they give significant coverage. This way we know that a referenced article can be created. If you find sources, bring them to the Articles for Deletion discussion linked to above.
IRWolfie- (
talk) 09:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Dougweller has mentioned to me that you appear to be struggling a little with our policies and guidelines. He has also said that he considers you to be acting in good faith, which is a good sign. I have been editing a lot here over the last 18 months or so and a lot of what I do is related to Indian articles, with a fair few Pakistan etc ones in the mix also. I won't claim to know every policy but I do know my way around. If you need any guidance then just leave a note here and I'll pick it up - I have added this page to my watchlist. - Sitush ( talk) 16:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Can you give me the names of the articles that you are concerned about. And remember, your real life must come first: there is no rush and almost anything is reversible here. - Sitush ( talk) 08:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Your addition to
Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. I just discovered that you have copied a considerable amount of material from
http://www.poemhunter.com/i/ebooks/pdf/zia_fatehabadi_2012_6.pdf into this article.
Dougweller (
talk) 09:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
K7L ( talk) 21:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch ( talk) 21:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
:- ) Don 16:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, I've restored your edits at Siddhi as I don't feel fully capable of judging this particular niche of material, so I'll cede the case and leave it up to other editors specialising in the topic to develop the consensus. I may have been a bit quick on the Revert because I was doing a batch of cleanups; not blaming you here, but just noting it would help people feel more comfortable with your edits like those if a) you tried to make edits in a cohesive group by checking your edits with Preview rather than saving, editing a little more, saving, editing a little more, etc. and b) if you give clearer Edit Summaries, and use them each time. Again, I should've checked closer, but the pattern of using no Edit Summary or a very brief one (like "adding info") and making lots of small edits is a behaviour often seen with vandalism or poor/uncited editing, so making larger single edits and using clear Edit Summaries would help your edits be more readily identified as constructive on the History tab. Just a suggestion to avoid alarming cleanup-editors like me who are on-edge watching for poor editing, which I agree yours was not in this particular case as best as I can tell. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 13:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Sitush brought me here. I do not understand what concept in Hindu astrology is the article talking about. It is very confusing. What Sanskrit term is being translated as astrological/planetary aspect?-- Redtigerxyz Talk 10:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Sitush informed me about this. Anatman is a Buddhist philosophy that basically says that there is no atman, while Hinduism in general believes in atman and opposes Anatman. [2] [3]. However, Advaita has a concept of Anatman in a different sense. Out of the article, only the last section deals with this. You can merge that section with Anatta#An.C4.81tman_in_other_Indian_traditions. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 10:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Redtigerxyz ji, I have noticed this section carries a tag since 2008. This has to be removed. I can substitute the already posted text by a concise version of my article in purport at par with the rest instead of the last section alone, in case you approve. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 12:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Redtigerxyz, I have checked your edits which are okay with me, but I feel that a major thought that paved the way for Advaita Vedanta to take shape and develop now seems to be a mere passing reference and nothing more. Adi Shankara occupies a very important place in Indian Thought. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 03:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Soni,
There is some discussion about your article as to whether it would be an expansion of the section Hindu astrology / Drishtis – the planetary aspects. The word Drishtis is not used in your article. Can you explain why your article would or would not fit as an expansion of this section? Thanks. -- :- ) Don 16:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
:- ) Don 04:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC):- ) Don 22:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 14:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Tito Dutta Ji, I have given short summary of chapters of Brihat Jataka. Sorry, I have already submitted my other article- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ Ānanda (Hindu philosophy). Soni Ruchi ( talk) 04:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi , I do like the kind of article you are creating , i do almost the same work. so do not hesitiate if you think of a topic and we can jointly develop the article Shrikanthv ( talk) 08:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The Illusive Man( Contact) 23:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Hi. I've nominated Brihat Jataka, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Why did you delete it my editing before even discussing ? Shrikanthv ( talk) 08:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Please have a look at here Ānanda_(Hindu_philosophy), I have created the article, please do not edit unless we have discussed in the talk page
![]() | On 30 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brihat Jataka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Brihat Jataka is described as India's foremost astrological text? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brihat Jataka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
I have added a comment in Yunshui's talk page. Keep an eye there. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 07:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 17:30, 1 November 2012 (UTC)"Adoption" might be incorrect word. In Wikipedia it means "editing suggestions". I still need suggestions every now and then. And I know I am not the only one. You have done improvements in citations formatting. Congratulations. Why are you going to AFC still? You can directly create articles. I have 260+ articles in Wikipedia, never went to AFC (though AFC is a very god process, but, I have not tried) To create an article directly (I mean the process I follow)–
-- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
In Yunshui's talk page I suggested you to forget Ānanda (Hindu philosophy), (technically you can not get article creator's attribution now, but you should I feel), there are thousands are more topics to work on.
For example see this list Adi_Shankara_bibliography#Prakara.E1.B9.87a_grantha, there are lots of books, treaties, slokas where articles can be created. If you create any click on those red links and you'll be redirected to article creation page. Make sure to check first that those articles already don't exist.
You don't need to necessarily work here. If you are not interested/you are busy with some other works, then okay no problem. These are just examples where you can work.
Hi soni ruchi, In wikipedia there are lot of contributors and an article is usually never written with only one authors point of view , there are constant edits and correction all the time , but this also means that you do not delete the whole previous article and change it to author point of view, if you are skeptical regarding any topics or details inside the article you need to mention this in talk page and thing have to be decided on mutual discussion may be with an outsider involved. so i am revising your edits in the above page so if you are skeptical on any things please mention this in talk page and we will descide. I do know you are honest editor with honest intent. Shrikanthv ( talk) 10:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
This was a remarkably level-headed and mature response to the reversion of your edit. Do remember that Shrikanthv doesn't own the article either, and you are perfectly entitled to continue editing it. I'd suggest, though, that you try engaging Shrikanthv and other editors at the article's talkpage, to get consensus for adding material to the page. Yunshui 雲 水 13:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Greetings Soni, I ran across another of your submissions at AFC. I do, overall, agree with Titto that your skills are great enough that you no longer need AFC. You are certainly welcome to use it if you prefer, but feel free to simply create articles now that your skills are sufficient. I had just a few minor comments regarding Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarvartha Chintamani.
Nice work, and I hope you continue to write articles, communicate with other editors and WikiProjects India and Hinduism, and overall enjoy yourself! MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi
I have seen your 'retirement' notice but I, personally, think it is premature. I believe you have a lot to offer on this site.
Your contributions on Urdu poets and writers may have been stubs to start with, but they are extremely useful and relevant, especially as you once stated somewhere that you yourself know little Urdu, which means you did a lot of research before creating the articles. You have given all these poets and writers a well-deserved permanent platform here. Zia Fatehabadi would have been proud of you. I actually met him once in my younger days.
The events of the past few days, which have led you to announce your premature retirement, should not dishearten you. I, for one, don't think you are to blame for what has transpired.
Think of what you have achieved here, rather than the setbacks. Go to the bottom of any page which shows your contributions, click on 'articles created' and the list looks pretty impressive, considering you are a teacher, a housewife and a mother and are usually doing your editing here in the wee hours of the morning.
What is perhaps really sad is that the article on 'happiness' actually seems to have caused a lot of unnecessary unhappiness. But then, unhappiness is always unnecessary.
Lots of people retire early or prematurely from whatever they have been doing and then come out of retirement when they realise they still have a lot to offer. I hope you, too, will reconsider your decision and remove the 'retired' signpost on your User page!-- Zananiri ( talk) 00:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Zananiri Ji, you are my elder and I respect you. I have quit because I am unwilling to face the situation such as:-
Soni Ruchi ( talk) 01:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3656157/Wikis-world.html -- Zananiri ( talk) 21:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 13:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Namaskar! the article Anātman is in a good condition (though some minor formatting issues). You can create it directly when it is ready! Tito Dutta ( talk) 07:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
That also looks great. Some error
You can create this article by clicking here Ananda (Vedanta)! Post in my talk page if you have question! -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 03:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
or you can change your vote too to Support or Comment etc. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)* '''Oppose:''' I oppose this merge because.... (your points)
Please do not take me wrongly , i do not plagarise material and nor do i want my name any of the article. knowing to that i had copied you content back to talk page to be discussed and added to the topic. hope you do not take me wrongly Shrikanthv ( talk) 06:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Yunshui 雲 水 08:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
That article looks good, thought I have not read it completely! Few sections need to be renamed like "Meaning of the word, Apurva" t "Meaning" etc! -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 13:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Tito just told me about you and I couldn't resist coming over to say a Hi! The surname co-incidence was quite a thing! TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 16:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
There is one article already Doha (poetry). You can expand the article. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salaam Machhlishahari, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 22:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatman (Hindu philosophy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 15:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 15:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Salaam Machhlishahari.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salaam Machhlishahari}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Soni Ruchi, thanks for creating Josh malsiyani!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy ( talk) 13:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Go to WP:DRV instead, although you are a bit late. I've deleted it again. Dougweller ( talk) 08:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " Anatman (Hindu philosophy)".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatman (Hindu philosophy)}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 12:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 03:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for creating the article Chitra-kavya -- it was long on my TODO list; glad that the article exists now. Cheers, Shreevatsa ( talk) 09:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Soni Ruchi,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
ArcAngel
(talk) ) 11:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gunadhya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buddhasvamin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " Liberation".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept)}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 00:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Soni Ruchi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Zia Fatehabadi.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Soni Ruchi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Soni Ruchi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Raaz Lyallpuri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
no notablity
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Khademhussain ( talk) 19:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Soni Ruchi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Sandstein 06:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. There is a DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 August 4 concerning the restoration of an userfied version of an article on whose AfD you commented. You may be better able to determine than I whether the concerns in the deletion nomination are met. Regards, Sandstein 06:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arsh Malsiani, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://publicationsdivision.nic.in/Lang-Pub/Kannada/LK01.htm.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I have seen the referred website, there has been no infrigement of copyright. I have posted only the barest info. on the subject. Regards. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 10:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, do you have a source for this edit? Looks interesting. I've removed it temporarily, until a source is found. Regards, Shreevatsa ( talk) 20:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I had seen a report of this find in a past issue of The Times of India New Delhi edition. It was a reported that a cave inscription in Prakrit and Sanskrit had been found in Bhanpura Tehsil of Madhya Pradesh indicating Kalidasa to have lived during the time of Shibi Janpal 2nd or 1st century B. C. I thought this fact was well-known. I am now eagerly seeking the relevant details. I have appreciated your efforts.Regards. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 11:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, if you know the date of the TImes of India issue, it would help searching for the source. If true this would be big news, so I'm surprised I can't find any mentions of it on the internet. Regards, Shreevatsa ( talk) 13:42, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
I am reverting to you on this subject after a long time. I am to submit that try hard I did I could not evoke any response from the Times of India or Archeological Survey of India. But I did notice an interesting post dated 08/03/2011 in Ancient Indians - Satya Samhita [ [1]] that reads -
"Kalidasa said that he started writing Jyotividaabharana in Vaisakha maasa of Kali 3068 which corresponds to 34 BCE."
What is your opinion? Do let me know. Regards. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 12:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Ruchi Ji,
First of all thank you for creating the page on my mother, I do intend to expand the page in coming weeks as and when time permits. There is a lot to be added about her literary life including her other books, collection of ghazals. The main problem is that I, shamefully so, cannot read Urdu. However now I do have some erratic help and hopefully this will be done soon. I presume you are Zia Fatehabadi sahab's granddaughter, I have a postcard from him to Ammi and picture of him with Ammi (and several others) taken sometime in late 70s. Am sure there must be a lot more but I don't know....
Regards, TariqueSani ( talk) 06:52, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Chzz
► 02:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Thank you for helping Wikipedia!
Chzz ► 02:56, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —
James (
Talk •
Contribs) • 8:47pm • 10:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)There is already an English Wikipedia page on that topic - Qat'aa. So, the best idea would be to edit that, and add to it, and improve it.
You could copy/paste from what you wrote in Wiktionary:qataa - but it's best if you do that yourself, instead of me - so that the history shows you wrote it.
Cheers, Chzz ► 05:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Chevy
monte
carlo 05:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC){{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Aaron Booth ( talk) 05:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ravinder Kumar Soni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Kumar Soni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller ( talk) 12:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Have you read WP:RS? We can't use forums as sources. I see no evidence that Ravinder Kumar Soni meets our criteria either. If you disagree, you can ask at WP:RSN. Dougweller ( talk) 12:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Please don't put peacock words in articles, see WP:PEACOCK. This would include 'eminent'. Thanks (whenever I see those words, I think "someone wants me to think this person is important, but is he really?). Actions speak louder than words, as they say. Dougweller ( talk) 17:31, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi I noticed your comment at the AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ravinder_Kumar_Soni. One of your articles Ravinder Kumar Soni was nominated for AfD, but don't be disheartened. This doesn't mean that fellow wikipedians don't value your efforts, but in this particular case they did not feel it was sufficiently notable. See the general requirements for the existence of wikipedia articles at the following link: WP:GNG. Reading up on this link can help you learn about what topics should exist on wikipedia. You might want to consult WP:RS about what sources should be used. IRWolfie- ( talk) 09:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zarina Sani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zarina Sani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dougweller ( talk) 06:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Soni Ruchi, to show notability you need to show what reliable sources there are on this topic and show they give significant coverage. This way we know that a referenced article can be created. If you find sources, bring them to the Articles for Deletion discussion linked to above.
IRWolfie- (
talk) 09:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Dougweller has mentioned to me that you appear to be struggling a little with our policies and guidelines. He has also said that he considers you to be acting in good faith, which is a good sign. I have been editing a lot here over the last 18 months or so and a lot of what I do is related to Indian articles, with a fair few Pakistan etc ones in the mix also. I won't claim to know every policy but I do know my way around. If you need any guidance then just leave a note here and I'll pick it up - I have added this page to my watchlist. - Sitush ( talk) 16:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Can you give me the names of the articles that you are concerned about. And remember, your real life must come first: there is no rush and almost anything is reversible here. - Sitush ( talk) 08:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Your addition to
Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. I just discovered that you have copied a considerable amount of material from
http://www.poemhunter.com/i/ebooks/pdf/zia_fatehabadi_2012_6.pdf into this article.
Dougweller (
talk) 09:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
K7L ( talk) 21:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch ( talk) 21:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
:- ) Don 16:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings, I've restored your edits at Siddhi as I don't feel fully capable of judging this particular niche of material, so I'll cede the case and leave it up to other editors specialising in the topic to develop the consensus. I may have been a bit quick on the Revert because I was doing a batch of cleanups; not blaming you here, but just noting it would help people feel more comfortable with your edits like those if a) you tried to make edits in a cohesive group by checking your edits with Preview rather than saving, editing a little more, saving, editing a little more, etc. and b) if you give clearer Edit Summaries, and use them each time. Again, I should've checked closer, but the pattern of using no Edit Summary or a very brief one (like "adding info") and making lots of small edits is a behaviour often seen with vandalism or poor/uncited editing, so making larger single edits and using clear Edit Summaries would help your edits be more readily identified as constructive on the History tab. Just a suggestion to avoid alarming cleanup-editors like me who are on-edge watching for poor editing, which I agree yours was not in this particular case as best as I can tell. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 13:11, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Sitush brought me here. I do not understand what concept in Hindu astrology is the article talking about. It is very confusing. What Sanskrit term is being translated as astrological/planetary aspect?-- Redtigerxyz Talk 10:34, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Sitush informed me about this. Anatman is a Buddhist philosophy that basically says that there is no atman, while Hinduism in general believes in atman and opposes Anatman. [2] [3]. However, Advaita has a concept of Anatman in a different sense. Out of the article, only the last section deals with this. You can merge that section with Anatta#An.C4.81tman_in_other_Indian_traditions. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 10:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Redtigerxyz ji, I have noticed this section carries a tag since 2008. This has to be removed. I can substitute the already posted text by a concise version of my article in purport at par with the rest instead of the last section alone, in case you approve. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 12:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
User:Redtigerxyz, I have checked your edits which are okay with me, but I feel that a major thought that paved the way for Advaita Vedanta to take shape and develop now seems to be a mere passing reference and nothing more. Adi Shankara occupies a very important place in Indian Thought. Soni Ruchi ( talk) 03:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Soni,
There is some discussion about your article as to whether it would be an expansion of the section Hindu astrology / Drishtis – the planetary aspects. The word Drishtis is not used in your article. Can you explain why your article would or would not fit as an expansion of this section? Thanks. -- :- ) Don 16:22, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
:- ) Don 04:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC):- ) Don 22:24, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 14:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Tito Dutta Ji, I have given short summary of chapters of Brihat Jataka. Sorry, I have already submitted my other article- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ Ānanda (Hindu philosophy). Soni Ruchi ( talk) 04:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi , I do like the kind of article you are creating , i do almost the same work. so do not hesitiate if you think of a topic and we can jointly develop the article Shrikanthv ( talk) 08:28, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
The Illusive Man( Contact) 23:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Hi. I've nominated Brihat Jataka, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:26, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Why did you delete it my editing before even discussing ? Shrikanthv ( talk) 08:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Please have a look at here Ānanda_(Hindu_philosophy), I have created the article, please do not edit unless we have discussed in the talk page
![]() | On 30 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brihat Jataka, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Brihat Jataka is described as India's foremost astrological text? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brihat Jataka. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 16:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
I have added a comment in Yunshui's talk page. Keep an eye there. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 07:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 17:30, 1 November 2012 (UTC)"Adoption" might be incorrect word. In Wikipedia it means "editing suggestions". I still need suggestions every now and then. And I know I am not the only one. You have done improvements in citations formatting. Congratulations. Why are you going to AFC still? You can directly create articles. I have 260+ articles in Wikipedia, never went to AFC (though AFC is a very god process, but, I have not tried) To create an article directly (I mean the process I follow)–
-- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
In Yunshui's talk page I suggested you to forget Ānanda (Hindu philosophy), (technically you can not get article creator's attribution now, but you should I feel), there are thousands are more topics to work on.
For example see this list Adi_Shankara_bibliography#Prakara.E1.B9.87a_grantha, there are lots of books, treaties, slokas where articles can be created. If you create any click on those red links and you'll be redirected to article creation page. Make sure to check first that those articles already don't exist.
You don't need to necessarily work here. If you are not interested/you are busy with some other works, then okay no problem. These are just examples where you can work.
Hi soni ruchi, In wikipedia there are lot of contributors and an article is usually never written with only one authors point of view , there are constant edits and correction all the time , but this also means that you do not delete the whole previous article and change it to author point of view, if you are skeptical regarding any topics or details inside the article you need to mention this in talk page and thing have to be decided on mutual discussion may be with an outsider involved. so i am revising your edits in the above page so if you are skeptical on any things please mention this in talk page and we will descide. I do know you are honest editor with honest intent. Shrikanthv ( talk) 10:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
This was a remarkably level-headed and mature response to the reversion of your edit. Do remember that Shrikanthv doesn't own the article either, and you are perfectly entitled to continue editing it. I'd suggest, though, that you try engaging Shrikanthv and other editors at the article's talkpage, to get consensus for adding material to the page. Yunshui 雲 水 13:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Greetings Soni, I ran across another of your submissions at AFC. I do, overall, agree with Titto that your skills are great enough that you no longer need AFC. You are certainly welcome to use it if you prefer, but feel free to simply create articles now that your skills are sufficient. I had just a few minor comments regarding Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarvartha Chintamani.
Nice work, and I hope you continue to write articles, communicate with other editors and WikiProjects India and Hinduism, and overall enjoy yourself! MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:12, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi
I have seen your 'retirement' notice but I, personally, think it is premature. I believe you have a lot to offer on this site.
Your contributions on Urdu poets and writers may have been stubs to start with, but they are extremely useful and relevant, especially as you once stated somewhere that you yourself know little Urdu, which means you did a lot of research before creating the articles. You have given all these poets and writers a well-deserved permanent platform here. Zia Fatehabadi would have been proud of you. I actually met him once in my younger days.
The events of the past few days, which have led you to announce your premature retirement, should not dishearten you. I, for one, don't think you are to blame for what has transpired.
Think of what you have achieved here, rather than the setbacks. Go to the bottom of any page which shows your contributions, click on 'articles created' and the list looks pretty impressive, considering you are a teacher, a housewife and a mother and are usually doing your editing here in the wee hours of the morning.
What is perhaps really sad is that the article on 'happiness' actually seems to have caused a lot of unnecessary unhappiness. But then, unhappiness is always unnecessary.
Lots of people retire early or prematurely from whatever they have been doing and then come out of retirement when they realise they still have a lot to offer. I hope you, too, will reconsider your decision and remove the 'retired' signpost on your User page!-- Zananiri ( talk) 00:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Zananiri Ji, you are my elder and I respect you. I have quit because I am unwilling to face the situation such as:-
Soni Ruchi ( talk) 01:23, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3656157/Wikis-world.html -- Zananiri ( talk) 21:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 13:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Namaskar! the article Anātman is in a good condition (though some minor formatting issues). You can create it directly when it is ready! Tito Dutta ( talk) 07:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
That also looks great. Some error
You can create this article by clicking here Ananda (Vedanta)! Post in my talk page if you have question! -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 03:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
or you can change your vote too to Support or Comment etc. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)* '''Oppose:''' I oppose this merge because.... (your points)
Please do not take me wrongly , i do not plagarise material and nor do i want my name any of the article. knowing to that i had copied you content back to talk page to be discussed and added to the topic. hope you do not take me wrongly Shrikanthv ( talk) 06:46, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Yunshui 雲 水 08:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
That article looks good, thought I have not read it completely! Few sections need to be renamed like "Meaning of the word, Apurva" t "Meaning" etc! -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 13:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Tito just told me about you and I couldn't resist coming over to say a Hi! The surname co-incidence was quite a thing! TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 16:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
There is one article already Doha (poetry). You can expand the article. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 17:16, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salaam Machhlishahari, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 22:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatman (Hindu philosophy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 15:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 15:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Salaam Machhlishahari.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Salaam Machhlishahari}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Soni Ruchi, thanks for creating Josh malsiyani!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy ( talk) 13:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Go to WP:DRV instead, although you are a bit late. I've deleted it again. Dougweller ( talk) 08:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " Anatman (Hindu philosophy)".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anatman (Hindu philosophy)}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 12:01, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 03:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 02:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for creating the article Chitra-kavya -- it was long on my TODO list; glad that the article exists now. Cheers, Shreevatsa ( talk) 09:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Soni Ruchi,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
ArcAngel
(talk) ) 11:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gunadhya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buddhasvamin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:21, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled " Liberation".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at
WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Liberation (the Advaita Vedanta concept)}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 00:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Soni Ruchi: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Tito Dutta ( talk) 18:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Soni Ruchi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Zia Fatehabadi.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 03:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Soni Ruchi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Soni Ruchi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Raaz Lyallpuri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
no notablity
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Khademhussain ( talk) 19:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)