Yes, posting comments to Talk:History of Croatia is fine. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 14:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you talked about Niccolo Fiorentino, so I thought you'd like to have a look at Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico. We have an Italian user there who insists that his proper name was Giorgio Orsini, but has not been able to provide a proper source to verify this. Either way the issue of most common name looks to favor the more geographic name for the main title, but it would be good to verify if there's any real merit to this argument. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
On my books of Art they are reported as being the same person. I gave a look to the talk on Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico (honestly disappointing, I wonder if these users mind really something about art) and I must confess that it's a true mess. Also, it is simply not serious that 80% of the article is about the dispute on the name and only 20% about his masterpieces. And everywhere in the article there are translation in the two languages of names and places... honestly the article should be written again from scrap. It should be an article on art and it is looks indeed as a street fight. What some users should understand is that in the XIV century parents did not go to the Town Hall to register their children! Only people with noble origins were keen in transmitting the family name to their children. Most of them were called "Name" + From (da) "somewhere". Concerning Giorgio Orsini (Alias Giorgio da Sebenico) this name was given to the artist when he was already dead. My proposal is to report in the text (briefly) this fact but to use for the rest of the article the name Giorgio da Sebenico. Side comment : in Italy it is quite known as Orsini. -- Silvio1973 ( talk) 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
A thread that concerns you has been posted on WP:ANI. See Personal attacks and incivility by User:Zenanarh. Regards -- Director ( talk) 14:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Silvio1973. It's Whenaxis again. I would just like to follow up with my previous mediation and I would like to see if there are any remaining issues that have been on your mind. Any questions regarding what the next step should be or anything else, I am happy to help you with your journey on Wikipedia. Please leave a message on my talk page on anything I can do to assist. Thanks, Whenaxis about | talk 20:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Dalmatia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 01:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
One of the things that might help citation in the Zadar article is use of the Template:Cite in its various formats: Cite news, Cite web, Cite book.
Also it is sufficient when linking to a page in a book on Google Books to limit the url to the book id and page number. Thus:
provides the same display as:
-- Bejnar ( talk) 04:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Silvio1973, I just wanted to stop by and say that your improvements to the Rasac article were exactly what I thought was needed when I placed that tag on it. Well done! - Jorgath ( talk) ( contribs) 12:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I responded to you on my talk page instead of here to keep the continuity of the conversation. -- ddima ( talk) 23:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
I wouldn't say the information you removed is of "no importance" - I did not add it to prove a particular point, but to provide additional background on his employment situation, especially given the fact that the article will become a DYK entry, and the hook is precisely about his job.
By the same criterion, it could be said that the information you entered is also of no importance, and in fact it was removed, and then restored. I have no problem with it, so let's not split hairs, I like the article the way it was, with both of these facts inside for the benefit of the reader. GregorB ( talk) 11:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
There is new thread on arbitration enforcement forum that might be interesting to you - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#DIREKTOR Nemambrata ( talk) 13:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Italianization". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 3 December 2012.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
15:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 23:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Please see activities of editor IvanOS at articles of cities and municipalities in Istria where he removes from infobox labels in Italian language ( Buje, Labin, Novigrad, Istria County...). It all started after my comment WP Croatia#Minority languages where I raised question about double standards towards different minority languages in Croatia-all in hope to improve position of all other minority languages. However, editors IvanOS and Sokac121 (they usually support Croatian nationalist POV), decided to insist that there should not be a minority languages in infoboxes and then this incident happened. It would be good if you can contribute on debate and maybe even invite other interested editors from other projects? I think that these two editors no longer represent major attitude at WP Croatia but interest of third parties who have experience with this issues may be useful just in case debate draws huge interest at WP Croatia. With their knowledge they can make a strong arguments and keep discussion civilized (I speak from previous experience with this topic). You can also warn editor IvanOS on inappropriateness of his actions so that there stay a trace because he already has inappropriate activities in case of other languages as you can see on his talk page.-- MirkoS18 ( talk) 02:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Here is a possible book/academic expert who can deal with linguistic issues around Romance/Slavic language naming and usage in the Adriatic area. Good luck.
A state of deference : Ragusa/Dubrovnik in the medieval centuries
Stuard, Susan Mosher Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, c1992 Tapered ( talk) 10:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Once a PROD has been removed you cannot re-add it, please take to WP:AFD. Giant Snowman 17:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Sig. Silvio, just posting to remind you of my respectful request that you provide a brief quote or two in support of your edits on Istrian Exodus (in light of previous misunderstandings re the explicit position of the relevant sources). The quote you did provide - cuts off right where it might have had something to say on the issue at hand. The quote need not be extensive in any way, but please make sure its relevant. As things are, experience warns me not to take the matter as sourced.. Ciao & regards -- Director ( talk) 15:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Istrian exodus". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions to this article. Would you please give a source for these additions or they may be removed? Regards, Ericoides ( talk) 13:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
In casi simili è meglio se mi mandi una mail direttamente (la trovi su meta) piuttosto che via Wikipedia, c'è il rischio che come ora finisca per non vederla affatto! -- Vituzzu ( talk) 20:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I've not insulted you, I don't think I've said anything to you before. I fully support your right to join in and participate in any discussion on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a free encyclopaedia which anyone can edit therefore you're more than welcome and edit any page and participate in any discussion. Regards IJA ( talk) 17:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Silvio1973 for your suggestion. I tried to rephrase as follows:
In July 2013,
ECtHR stated that a de facto recognition of the acts of
Northern Cyprus may be rendered necessary for practical purposes thereby the adoption of civil, administrative or criminal law measures, and their application by its authorities or enforcement within that territory, may be regarded as having a legal basis in domestic law for the purposes of
the Convention".(ref1) The beginning of direct flights to
Northern Cyprus by the other states is regarded as indirect recognition of
Northern Cyprus as an independent state.(ref2)
ref1:
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-122907 ECHR Decision]02.07.2013, App. nos. 9130/09 and 9143/09; Pavlides v. Turkey; Georgakis v. Turkey
ref2:
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sann2029/FCO_Paper%20by%20Dr%20Stefan%20Talmon.pdf Stefan Talmon (Assoc. Prof., Oxford)]"Air Traffic with Non-Recognised States: the Case of Northern Cyprus", p.30
Alexyflemming (
talk)
13:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Silvio. It looks like you started a new article at HR 5171. Since a requested move has just closed, that page has been replaced with the former contents of V766 Centauri. If you still have the material you added previously, you might try to insert it in HR 5171 if you believe it is relevant. You can see your old material at this link if you need to copy it. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
The things you said to Direktor are unacceptable. The undertones may be difficult for an outsider to fully appreciate, but they are still obvious. Editing in areas like the Balkans is risky, as admin are given extra leeway to deal with problems. You need to step back a little bit, maybe edit less controversial topics for a bit. These controversial topics are easy to get caught up in, to edit war, to say things you shouldn't say, and to get blocked. From what I see, your English is respectable but not perfect, so you must learn to give the benefit of the doubt to others, or you will find yourself in the wrong and upset for no reason. What I fear is that if you don't pull back a little, be less aggressive and more patient, you will get blocked. You may yet, I hold no special authority to decide the outcome of that discussion, I can only give my opinion. The community is free to ignore it.
If you find your blood pressure rising, your emotions rising, then you need to walk away from that article for a day. Go edit something else. Ice cream, Polar bear, whatever, just something else that doesn't make your emotions get the best of you. We all have opinions, we all get frustrated, but you have to learn when to walk away and cool down. Otherwise, you will end up getting blocked over and over. I'm not asking you to change your opinions, just the way you deal with frustration. The article was there yesterday, it will be there tomorrow. Nothing is so urgent that you can't walk away for a day when you need to. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 20:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
I saw you first time on ANI when Direktor had brought you. I didn't knew that you have good knowledge about numerous world affairs and politics. I was just saying that you should avoid conflict as much as you can, I understand that sometimes edit conflicts is completely out of control. About your english, I would advise that you to read more than you write, for some weeks or months. Here [1] you forgot to close the bracket in your comment, be careful about them, and good luck with your editing. Thanks for your contributions. OccultZone ( Talk) 09:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Silvio: The abridgment on Russia looked reasonable, and my edit is restoring the news on the Geneva Pact. Wikipedia policy recognizes International Pacts and Treaties as Notable for inclusion. If you have a follow-up then perhaps Talk page first would be useful. Otherwise the abridgment on Russia looked reasonable for Crimea. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
To Silvio; Upon request of User:EVergreen, I have initiated a BRD on the issue of the back-and-forth editing on the Ukraine page which you had previously commented upon. Good Editing. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MarkBernstein ( talk) 00:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
According to policy you can post all kinds of ridiculous maps. I had a very long edit war about maps and now several people hate me. lol, I think we should both go do something a lot more useful and less controversial. USchick ( talk) 20:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I reverted your edits about the contribution of Istrian and Dalmatian art in Renaissance, since this is a general article about Italy, with limited space about this topic, and citing them there, you give undue weight (this is the meaning of UNDUE) to them with respect to other regions/artists which are not cited. The fact that now these regions do not belong to the Italian Republic is not sufficent reason to cite them, since Laurana is neither bramante nor Michelangelo. Of course, in another context, like an article about venetian art, they must stay there. Alex2006 ( talk) 10:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic HERE. Thank you. SW3 5DL ( talk) 16:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I have removed your submission at WP:3O. After reviewing the linked Talk page, I note that there has not been a thorough discussion there. Please be aware that there must be significant discussion at the Talk page as a prerequisite for requesting a third opinion. If you feel that further discussion at the Talk page currently will not be productive, I would invite you to consider other forms of dispute resolution. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago ( talk) 13:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Silvio1973, I appreciate your work on these articles. They are an important part or history and need to be well documented. Please remember that it is always best to work through the talk pages anytime you have an issue. Don't go straight to the article but work it out first on the talk page. The articles around East European history can be very controversial so take extra caution when working here. The art of compromise is important to learn. Articles that have been around for a long time are generally pretty stable and people are resistant to sudden change. Work with them. You can learn much from the editors here but go easy. Thanks! JodyB talk 14:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please Silvio stop with this. Leave the article as it is now, ok? Please just stop threatening everyone. We have reached a consensus before. I will not revert you anymore. I think it is stupid to add more sources to the lead, as it is overflowed with citations (only because of people like you), but ok, it is a consensus. Is that ok? Tnx -- Tuvixer ( talk) 20:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, there are non-UN member States recognised by less UN members. So, If my edit will be reverted, I'll add disputed territory to all of them. -- Skyfall ( talk) 11:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Silvio,
Unfortunately the problem now seems to stem from the way you worded the RfC: it should have been a clear question with a yes or no answer (i.e. Support or Oppose). Now I'm not certain anymore what the RfC was about and everyone has his own interpretation of the outcome. Let me take a closer look at the article, I'll get back to you later. GregorB ( talk) 12:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Actually, there is a good option left: opening a new RfC, this time with a clearly worded question, as suggested by the previous RfC's closing admin. [2]
The other good option is simply moving on. The existing debate consumed a lot of time, did not produce anything of substance, and even if did, it would have been questionable whether its end result (saying that Tito oppressed his opposition in the article's intro) justified the effort or not.
The decision is on you. Should you decide to open a new RfC, please consult me about the wording before it's submitted. GregorB ( talk) 10:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Please be careful with such edits: having an offline source is not the same as having no source at all, so one cannot say it's unsourced. I'd say it's a reliable source. (Not only TIME is a reputable magazine, but one cannot reasonably claim it is biased in favor of a communist government.) Normally, WP:AGF applies in such cases. Still, if a reasonable doubt exists about the exact wording, then whoever added this ref must be able to show that it indeed supports the article text. My suggestion would be to leave the ref as it is, and use {{ Request quotation}} to challenge it (if that was actually your intention). GregorB ( talk) 16:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
It would appear all your edits have been undone by User:Stariradio, clearly against consensus. 23 editor ( talk) 13:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
At the "crimea annexation by russian federation" talk page, a user named saintaviator made a comment that russian military intervention had saved the local residents from fascists. This a clear trolling and an insult to ukraine and ukrainian people, and i would like you to remove those comments. 37.233.63.200 ( talk) 14:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Silvio1973. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Silvio, I need your help. As an Italian (ultranationalist maniac and raving fascist), you should be able to help me out with this image: File:Flag of Italy (1946-2003).svg. Notice the colours, especially the green. Are those really the correct colours for the tricolore before 2003?? You know I'm interested in heraldry and vexillology.. If the current shades actually date from 2006 or whenever - and that is the proper old green... then flags like the ones on Kingdom of Italy should be amended. All older flags use the current, 2006 colours. -- Director ( talk) 12:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
(P.s. I'm kidding above, don't report me. Us fascists have to stick together. -- Director ( talk) 12:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC))
Hello, Silvio1973. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ReleaseTheMemo. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Enpass. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of electronic cigarette brands. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Windows Server 2016. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lists of earthquakes. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trypophobia. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bipolar disorder. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of 7400-series integrated circuits. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Silvio1973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Jacobin (magazine) on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:List of leaders of the Soviet Union on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
User talk:Crouch, Swale/England on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Ivermectin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:GameStop on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Great Barrington Declaration on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Silvio1973! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over a year.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{
Frs user|Silvio1973|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
I happened to come across this edit from 2014. This is improper, please read what WP:Plagiarism and WP:Non-free content say about long copies of copyrighted source material. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Yes, posting comments to Talk:History of Croatia is fine. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 14:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
I noticed you talked about Niccolo Fiorentino, so I thought you'd like to have a look at Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico. We have an Italian user there who insists that his proper name was Giorgio Orsini, but has not been able to provide a proper source to verify this. Either way the issue of most common name looks to favor the more geographic name for the main title, but it would be good to verify if there's any real merit to this argument. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
On my books of Art they are reported as being the same person. I gave a look to the talk on Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico (honestly disappointing, I wonder if these users mind really something about art) and I must confess that it's a true mess. Also, it is simply not serious that 80% of the article is about the dispute on the name and only 20% about his masterpieces. And everywhere in the article there are translation in the two languages of names and places... honestly the article should be written again from scrap. It should be an article on art and it is looks indeed as a street fight. What some users should understand is that in the XIV century parents did not go to the Town Hall to register their children! Only people with noble origins were keen in transmitting the family name to their children. Most of them were called "Name" + From (da) "somewhere". Concerning Giorgio Orsini (Alias Giorgio da Sebenico) this name was given to the artist when he was already dead. My proposal is to report in the text (briefly) this fact but to use for the rest of the article the name Giorgio da Sebenico. Side comment : in Italy it is quite known as Orsini. -- Silvio1973 ( talk) 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
A thread that concerns you has been posted on WP:ANI. See Personal attacks and incivility by User:Zenanarh. Regards -- Director ( talk) 14:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Silvio1973. It's Whenaxis again. I would just like to follow up with my previous mediation and I would like to see if there are any remaining issues that have been on your mind. Any questions regarding what the next step should be or anything else, I am happy to help you with your journey on Wikipedia. Please leave a message on my talk page on anything I can do to assist. Thanks, Whenaxis about | talk 20:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Dalmatia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 01:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
One of the things that might help citation in the Zadar article is use of the Template:Cite in its various formats: Cite news, Cite web, Cite book.
Also it is sufficient when linking to a page in a book on Google Books to limit the url to the book id and page number. Thus:
provides the same display as:
-- Bejnar ( talk) 04:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Silvio1973, I just wanted to stop by and say that your improvements to the Rasac article were exactly what I thought was needed when I placed that tag on it. Well done! - Jorgath ( talk) ( contribs) 12:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey, I responded to you on my talk page instead of here to keep the continuity of the conversation. -- ddima ( talk) 23:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
I wouldn't say the information you removed is of "no importance" - I did not add it to prove a particular point, but to provide additional background on his employment situation, especially given the fact that the article will become a DYK entry, and the hook is precisely about his job.
By the same criterion, it could be said that the information you entered is also of no importance, and in fact it was removed, and then restored. I have no problem with it, so let's not split hairs, I like the article the way it was, with both of these facts inside for the benefit of the reader. GregorB ( talk) 11:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
There is new thread on arbitration enforcement forum that might be interesting to you - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#DIREKTOR Nemambrata ( talk) 13:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Italianization". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 3 December 2012.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
15:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 23:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Please see activities of editor IvanOS at articles of cities and municipalities in Istria where he removes from infobox labels in Italian language ( Buje, Labin, Novigrad, Istria County...). It all started after my comment WP Croatia#Minority languages where I raised question about double standards towards different minority languages in Croatia-all in hope to improve position of all other minority languages. However, editors IvanOS and Sokac121 (they usually support Croatian nationalist POV), decided to insist that there should not be a minority languages in infoboxes and then this incident happened. It would be good if you can contribute on debate and maybe even invite other interested editors from other projects? I think that these two editors no longer represent major attitude at WP Croatia but interest of third parties who have experience with this issues may be useful just in case debate draws huge interest at WP Croatia. With their knowledge they can make a strong arguments and keep discussion civilized (I speak from previous experience with this topic). You can also warn editor IvanOS on inappropriateness of his actions so that there stay a trace because he already has inappropriate activities in case of other languages as you can see on his talk page.-- MirkoS18 ( talk) 02:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Here is a possible book/academic expert who can deal with linguistic issues around Romance/Slavic language naming and usage in the Adriatic area. Good luck.
A state of deference : Ragusa/Dubrovnik in the medieval centuries
Stuard, Susan Mosher Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, c1992 Tapered ( talk) 10:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Once a PROD has been removed you cannot re-add it, please take to WP:AFD. Giant Snowman 17:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Sig. Silvio, just posting to remind you of my respectful request that you provide a brief quote or two in support of your edits on Istrian Exodus (in light of previous misunderstandings re the explicit position of the relevant sources). The quote you did provide - cuts off right where it might have had something to say on the issue at hand. The quote need not be extensive in any way, but please make sure its relevant. As things are, experience warns me not to take the matter as sourced.. Ciao & regards -- Director ( talk) 15:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Istrian exodus". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions to this article. Would you please give a source for these additions or they may be removed? Regards, Ericoides ( talk) 13:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
In casi simili è meglio se mi mandi una mail direttamente (la trovi su meta) piuttosto che via Wikipedia, c'è il rischio che come ora finisca per non vederla affatto! -- Vituzzu ( talk) 20:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
I've not insulted you, I don't think I've said anything to you before. I fully support your right to join in and participate in any discussion on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a free encyclopaedia which anyone can edit therefore you're more than welcome and edit any page and participate in any discussion. Regards IJA ( talk) 17:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
Silvio1973 for your suggestion. I tried to rephrase as follows:
In July 2013,
ECtHR stated that a de facto recognition of the acts of
Northern Cyprus may be rendered necessary for practical purposes thereby the adoption of civil, administrative or criminal law measures, and their application by its authorities or enforcement within that territory, may be regarded as having a legal basis in domestic law for the purposes of
the Convention".(ref1) The beginning of direct flights to
Northern Cyprus by the other states is regarded as indirect recognition of
Northern Cyprus as an independent state.(ref2)
ref1:
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-122907 ECHR Decision]02.07.2013, App. nos. 9130/09 and 9143/09; Pavlides v. Turkey; Georgakis v. Turkey
ref2:
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sann2029/FCO_Paper%20by%20Dr%20Stefan%20Talmon.pdf Stefan Talmon (Assoc. Prof., Oxford)]"Air Traffic with Non-Recognised States: the Case of Northern Cyprus", p.30
Alexyflemming (
talk)
13:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Silvio. It looks like you started a new article at HR 5171. Since a requested move has just closed, that page has been replaced with the former contents of V766 Centauri. If you still have the material you added previously, you might try to insert it in HR 5171 if you believe it is relevant. You can see your old material at this link if you need to copy it. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
The things you said to Direktor are unacceptable. The undertones may be difficult for an outsider to fully appreciate, but they are still obvious. Editing in areas like the Balkans is risky, as admin are given extra leeway to deal with problems. You need to step back a little bit, maybe edit less controversial topics for a bit. These controversial topics are easy to get caught up in, to edit war, to say things you shouldn't say, and to get blocked. From what I see, your English is respectable but not perfect, so you must learn to give the benefit of the doubt to others, or you will find yourself in the wrong and upset for no reason. What I fear is that if you don't pull back a little, be less aggressive and more patient, you will get blocked. You may yet, I hold no special authority to decide the outcome of that discussion, I can only give my opinion. The community is free to ignore it.
If you find your blood pressure rising, your emotions rising, then you need to walk away from that article for a day. Go edit something else. Ice cream, Polar bear, whatever, just something else that doesn't make your emotions get the best of you. We all have opinions, we all get frustrated, but you have to learn when to walk away and cool down. Otherwise, you will end up getting blocked over and over. I'm not asking you to change your opinions, just the way you deal with frustration. The article was there yesterday, it will be there tomorrow. Nothing is so urgent that you can't walk away for a day when you need to. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 20:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
I saw you first time on ANI when Direktor had brought you. I didn't knew that you have good knowledge about numerous world affairs and politics. I was just saying that you should avoid conflict as much as you can, I understand that sometimes edit conflicts is completely out of control. About your english, I would advise that you to read more than you write, for some weeks or months. Here [1] you forgot to close the bracket in your comment, be careful about them, and good luck with your editing. Thanks for your contributions. OccultZone ( Talk) 09:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi Silvio: The abridgment on Russia looked reasonable, and my edit is restoring the news on the Geneva Pact. Wikipedia policy recognizes International Pacts and Treaties as Notable for inclusion. If you have a follow-up then perhaps Talk page first would be useful. Otherwise the abridgment on Russia looked reasonable for Crimea. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
To Silvio; Upon request of User:EVergreen, I have initiated a BRD on the issue of the back-and-forth editing on the Ukraine page which you had previously commented upon. Good Editing. FelixRosch ( talk) 15:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MarkBernstein ( talk) 00:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
According to policy you can post all kinds of ridiculous maps. I had a very long edit war about maps and now several people hate me. lol, I think we should both go do something a lot more useful and less controversial. USchick ( talk) 20:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I reverted your edits about the contribution of Istrian and Dalmatian art in Renaissance, since this is a general article about Italy, with limited space about this topic, and citing them there, you give undue weight (this is the meaning of UNDUE) to them with respect to other regions/artists which are not cited. The fact that now these regions do not belong to the Italian Republic is not sufficent reason to cite them, since Laurana is neither bramante nor Michelangelo. Of course, in another context, like an article about venetian art, they must stay there. Alex2006 ( talk) 10:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic HERE. Thank you. SW3 5DL ( talk) 16:12, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I have removed your submission at WP:3O. After reviewing the linked Talk page, I note that there has not been a thorough discussion there. Please be aware that there must be significant discussion at the Talk page as a prerequisite for requesting a third opinion. If you feel that further discussion at the Talk page currently will not be productive, I would invite you to consider other forms of dispute resolution. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago ( talk) 13:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Silvio1973, I appreciate your work on these articles. They are an important part or history and need to be well documented. Please remember that it is always best to work through the talk pages anytime you have an issue. Don't go straight to the article but work it out first on the talk page. The articles around East European history can be very controversial so take extra caution when working here. The art of compromise is important to learn. Articles that have been around for a long time are generally pretty stable and people are resistant to sudden change. Work with them. You can learn much from the editors here but go easy. Thanks! JodyB talk 14:27, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please Silvio stop with this. Leave the article as it is now, ok? Please just stop threatening everyone. We have reached a consensus before. I will not revert you anymore. I think it is stupid to add more sources to the lead, as it is overflowed with citations (only because of people like you), but ok, it is a consensus. Is that ok? Tnx -- Tuvixer ( talk) 20:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, there are non-UN member States recognised by less UN members. So, If my edit will be reverted, I'll add disputed territory to all of them. -- Skyfall ( talk) 11:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Silvio,
Unfortunately the problem now seems to stem from the way you worded the RfC: it should have been a clear question with a yes or no answer (i.e. Support or Oppose). Now I'm not certain anymore what the RfC was about and everyone has his own interpretation of the outcome. Let me take a closer look at the article, I'll get back to you later. GregorB ( talk) 12:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Actually, there is a good option left: opening a new RfC, this time with a clearly worded question, as suggested by the previous RfC's closing admin. [2]
The other good option is simply moving on. The existing debate consumed a lot of time, did not produce anything of substance, and even if did, it would have been questionable whether its end result (saying that Tito oppressed his opposition in the article's intro) justified the effort or not.
The decision is on you. Should you decide to open a new RfC, please consult me about the wording before it's submitted. GregorB ( talk) 10:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Please be careful with such edits: having an offline source is not the same as having no source at all, so one cannot say it's unsourced. I'd say it's a reliable source. (Not only TIME is a reputable magazine, but one cannot reasonably claim it is biased in favor of a communist government.) Normally, WP:AGF applies in such cases. Still, if a reasonable doubt exists about the exact wording, then whoever added this ref must be able to show that it indeed supports the article text. My suggestion would be to leave the ref as it is, and use {{ Request quotation}} to challenge it (if that was actually your intention). GregorB ( talk) 16:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
It would appear all your edits have been undone by User:Stariradio, clearly against consensus. 23 editor ( talk) 13:47, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
At the "crimea annexation by russian federation" talk page, a user named saintaviator made a comment that russian military intervention had saved the local residents from fascists. This a clear trolling and an insult to ukraine and ukrainian people, and i would like you to remove those comments. 37.233.63.200 ( talk) 14:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Silvio1973. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}} to your friends' talk pages.
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot ( talk) 04:23, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Silvio, I need your help. As an Italian (ultranationalist maniac and raving fascist), you should be able to help me out with this image: File:Flag of Italy (1946-2003).svg. Notice the colours, especially the green. Are those really the correct colours for the tricolore before 2003?? You know I'm interested in heraldry and vexillology.. If the current shades actually date from 2006 or whenever - and that is the proper old green... then flags like the ones on Kingdom of Italy should be amended. All older flags use the current, 2006 colours. -- Director ( talk) 12:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
(P.s. I'm kidding above, don't report me. Us fascists have to stick together. -- Director ( talk) 12:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC))
Hello, Silvio1973. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ReleaseTheMemo. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk's Tesla Roadster. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Enpass. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of electronic cigarette brands. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Windows Server 2016. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lists of earthquakes. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trypophobia. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bipolar disorder. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of 7400-series integrated circuits. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Silvio1973. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
at Talk:Jacobin (magazine) on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:List of leaders of the Soviet Union on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
User talk:Crouch, Swale/England on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Ivermectin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:GameStop on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Great Barrington Declaration on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi Silvio1973! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over a year.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
{{
Frs user|Silvio1973|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
I happened to come across this edit from 2014. This is improper, please read what WP:Plagiarism and WP:Non-free content say about long copies of copyrighted source material. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)