I appreciate your support and trust in my recent run for admin. I've had an interesting first few weeks and am learning a lot by being able to better watch (through tools) what admins do. At first, I'm stepping my toes into the AIV arena but watching backlogs. Please call on me if you see making an error, or if you just need help. Thanks again. BusterD ( talk) 17:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
So I did not know that the collision was already in the article since another person said it wasn’t true, so I decided to clear things up and say to him that it is true. Once that was done, I started working on the collision part. And yes, it can be in the lead, because it is talking about the other galaxies nearby the Milky Way, and also since it was sort of a perfect place to fit it in. So I also want your opinion - do you think it should be in the lead, it can be, I dunno what you confirmed users want…
-Pixomite Pixomite ( talk) 22:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
I removed that section because it violates wikipedia's NPOV. The sources are not worthy of inclusion. Thanks 2600:8805:C980:9400:6CA5:272F:8B6C:F6C6 ( talk) 20:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't know what I can do against this disruptive user: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Amusement_Park&action=history You opened a thread in talk page to tell stop edit warring, I justified everything in talk page with more than a dozen of sources, user couldn't dispute any of them and stopped participating. And as such, I made adjustments per talk page and also added some new info with source. He just destroyed all of them by reverting with a complete destruction with his disruptive behaviour. I did everything in line with rules, I extensively justified everything in talk page. He removed an information by another user by declaring "box office magazine" as not reliable and then my new additions with his complete reversion with a nonsense summary without any care. I added a new info along with a source, and adjustments I made "reflects the references" and justified in talk page extensively. He's reverting with "Rv to version which reflects the references". My adjustments -reflects- the references. This is trolling at this point and very disruptive. He "owns" the article and stubbornly sticks to the his inaccurate initial edits and do not let anyone to make adjustments despite it's justified with a dozen of sources. Tehonk ( talk) 16:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
the link given by admin yesterday was saying "active block", it's over, there is no active block... Tehonk ( talk) 22:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but how do I add a talk or comment section? News sources say some people received the award the article is about, but not what year, and I don't know what to do about it. I was going to leave a comment in the talk section, but I don't know how to do that? InezSerrano ( talk) 00:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
I think I figured it all out, thank you so much. If you have the time to review my changes to the article tomorrow, I'd welcome it. Good Night! InezSerrano ( talk) 01:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd, thanks for telling me about my edit on Chinese People. I'll keep your lecture in mind. Next time I won't add wikilinks to subsections. Best, Twilight Sparkle 222 ( talk) 09:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for reverting that annoyance on my userpage - I hadn't even noticed their return to bother me about the RfA. Please accept this token of my appreciation. ♠Vami _IV†♠ 13:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for fixing the age template on Angela Paxton. -- 76.14.39.120 ( talk) 02:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
On 15 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Charlotte Johnson Wahl, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 17:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd. You just sent me this message: "I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elvis Francois, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)"
-- The source that was included in the edit includes all of the information I edited/added. As the source was from Rolling Stone, I would imagine this is a reliable source. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzurn ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for your reply! It looks like the "Zach Zurn" information was not there - that is correct. But both reference numbers 1 and 4 mentioned the album being recorded at Carpet Booth Studios.
Reference 1: Dr. Elvis Francois, an orthopedic surgery resident at the Mayo Clinic, records a song at Carpet Booth Studios in Rochester, Minn.
Reference 4: A few days after their call, the surgeons were in Rochester’s Carpet Booth Studios cutting “Imagine” and “Lean on Me,” along with Mike Yung’s “Alright” and Andra Day’s “Rise Up.” The R&B singer’s inspiring lyrics — “I’ll rise like the day … I’ll rise unafraid” — are a regular in the Robinson’s rotation.
I will submit another edit without the Zach Zurn edit. Thank you! Zzurn ( talk) 22:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. The Australian PM said the submarines would not need to be refueled during its lifetime. The Guardian article states that the French nuclear vessels have to be refueled every 10 years because they use non-weapons-grade uranium. Regards. Trigenibinion ( talk) 22:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd. Hope this finds you well? I was hoping you might have a minute to take a look here. Thanks so much in advance. Daizypeach ( talk) 14:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
I accept that made mistakes. But earlier a user who warned me warned Vucein also but they started accusing them also claiming they do correct edits. And I saw their contributions. They just remove things from every page they edit. But they need to understand that Anupamaa is an on-air show. And it's story will increase. And the plot which they remove in the name of last stable is more than 1 month old as I'm the regular viewer of the show. Even they use prefixes like Baa and Bapuji as nicknames which is wrong. And remove nicknames and post marital surnames of some characters. Add unsourced ratings. And remove even info about 2 tracks for whom they were made. Is this behaviour nice??? Pra2310 ( talk) 19:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Vucein doesn't agree to anyone. They just think they're perfect. Atleast I'm accepting my mistakes. But they doesn't. You may visit their talk page. Where discussion Anupamaa on 30 held Pra2310 ( talk) 03:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
see Vucein isn't ready to talk and constantly removing necessary plot. Removing plot which is more than 1 month old. Removing necessary info from cast and soundtrack section and not willing to come on talk page. Then what could I do Pra2310 ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for the suggestion Pra2310 ( talk) 00:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pra2310’s version contains over detailed plot additions. They keep adding unnecessary details which do not belong in the plot section. It is supposed to be summed up as per Wikipedia rules. And their additions in the soundtrack section are purely fancruft. They need to stop promoting SaNan, aka the ship name of two characters of the show. Wikipedia doesn't allow this. It is isn’t fandom.com for the user to keep on doing this. Vucien ( talk) 07:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Oh really @Vucien. I visited your talk page. You engage in war edit with everyone. I just engaged with you. Well I'll not use ship name. It's my fault. But atleast don't remove info about the tracks for whom they were made. They were purely meant for Samar and Nandini. And don't remove plot to more than 1 month old track. I'm a regular viewer of show since beginning. Remember it's an on-air show. If you want to condense plot then go to Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein page. There everything is detailed. Pra2310 ( talk) 14:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pra2310 you need to stop adding over detailed plot to the section. You cannot add everything that happens in a show to the plot section. Go read Wikipedia’s guidelines about conciseness and word limit. Vucien ( talk) 08:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
When you find copied text thats CC or PD compatible, don't forget the {{ CC-notice}} (or {{ PD-notice}} templates to properly attribute the text. Sennecaster ( Chat) 20:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi for the page Haraldskær Woman I added a link on "The Cultural Museum" because I am sure there's many The Cultural Museums in the world. the The Cultural Museum of in central Vejle, Denmark didn't have a wiki page so instead I pasted an external link from what I thought was the official website. That's the reason behind me adding the external link. Thanks for your time-- LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 13:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, so external links from the official organisation is a no no? LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 15:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Indeed, thanks a lot! LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 16:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
This user Buffalo8 deliberately rigged one page An American Tail: The Treasure of Manhattan Island by deleting true sources as grammatical errors. I’ve saw the end of the film as it stated the Native American cultures were researched from Stockbridge Munsee Community and he deleted it like it was rubbish. I’m having a nervous breakdown. Could you please set things straight to him for me? Retrosunshine2006 talk 18:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry. I did not know. I thought he was vandalizing. I’ll know next time before editing. BTW, An American Tail is my favorite film series. Retrosunshine2006 talk 18:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have been talking with another editor about the Feynman Technique and its association with Feynman and can't seem to find any viable source despite the publicity behind it. I was thinking about removing most of the citations as they are quite poor and noticed you removed one from medium. The first instance of the technique that I can find on the internet is a youtube video back in 2012, I can't seem to find anything before that. I am thinking of putting some of the science behind the technique on the page. What are your thoughts on the current citations? I am a new editor so apologies for the errors :) DannyHatcher ( talk) 00:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, i accept that i made a mistake by adding the link in 2 related articles. But i was only reading related article and if i find something where i can add the reference i added them. In the case of waistcoat ( /info/en/?search=Waistcoat ) article there was no citation added there and it said citation needed. The link i added had the picture of same design product so i added it there. i would also like to ask is the website i added not trustworthy or is it that we can only add article as citation? Wajahat elahi ( talk) 08:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
The variant of the clergy cassock may be cut as a vest. It differs in style from other waistcoats in that the garment buttons to the neck and has an opening that displays the clerical collar.. Your link offered nothing to make that information verifiable. In the Jeans article, the information that needed a source was
The production of jeans with a "used look" can be more environmentally damaging than regular jeans,. A link to a page to buy a pair of jeans does not help readers verify the information.You should read WP:RS to learn more about the types of sources that are appropriate for Wikipedia articles. When you find a source and aren't sure whether it would be considered a reliable source, check WP:RSPS to see if it's been discussed; if it isn't listed there, you can ask at WP:RSN.If you have questions as you learn to edit articles, you're welcome to ask me here, and you can also get useful advice at WP:TEAHOUSE. Hope that helps! Schazjmd (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
I have posted a reply on my talk page where you posted. deisenbe ( talk) 21:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for doing the redirect, I am still new to editing and didn't know how to do it. I was going to look into it tomorrow. Could you give me a quick run down about how and what you did? DannyHatcher ( talk) 22:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Content copied from (name of article), see that article's history for attribution. Because I wrote a new sentence in the Learning by teaching article, I didn't need to attribute it.Occasionally, an article simply duplicates information elsewhere and shouldn't be a stand-alone article. Then you just replace the content with the redirect syntax to the correct target. Hope that helps! Drop by here anytime if you have more questions. Schazjmd (talk) 22:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
In the past for all the numerous times you have openly rebuked me about my shortcomings and simultaneously defended me when the need arose, it takes a true friend to chastise and tell their friends the truth. Thank you so much, you have made me a better me. Celestina007 ( talk) 02:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC) |
Mrdnartdesign ( talk) 16:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)mrdnartdesign . Thanks for the tip. My first chatting re. a dispute!
Dear Schazjmd: Do you know how I can delete every addition, every edit, everything I ever contributed to this site? After today, I want nothing to do with it. Mrdnartdesign ( talk) 20:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to know what you mean by for children parameter, use number for properly sourced number of children? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UpsidedownVal ( talk • contribs) 01:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I find this confusing because I have never once seen a wiki page where there are numbers in place of names for children. Moreover, I see bulks of pages that not only contain the names of the children rather than numbers, but contain names of children with no wiki page and/or no notoriety. Can you please direct me to where the information on listing children is? I'd also like to add that the revisions in question by Didoo1 are not in regards to whether her child, Stanton LaVey is notable (of which he does happen to be and I am working on his page now), but in regards to the user's reasoning which is personal rather than factual. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UpsidedownVal ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I read this as the parameters: Typically the number of children (e.g., 3); only list names of independently notable or particularly relevant children. Names may be preceded by a number to show total children and avoid implying that named children are the only offspring. For multiple entries, use an inline list. For privacy reasons, consider omitting the names of living children, unless notable. For the sake of the argument you are putting forth, Stanton LaVey is both notable and relevant. However, I will be changing my edit of the page to say "1" since there is no wiki page of Stanton LaVey. If Didoo1 tries to undo this edit I will create another report as that goes right back to the reason for my report to begin with which is that Didoo1 is using personal reasons rather than factual ones which negates neutrality. Thank you for all your feedback. [1] [2] [3] UpsidedownVal ( talk) 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
References
Hi Schazmd, Thanks for your note. I’m a newbie to Wiki edits so I don’t know how to reference or which changes I made need documentation. I’m Valerie’s brother, so some of what I added is from personal interaction and family history. E.g., Val spent 1945-49 in Japan with our folks and indeed danced Kabuki but how do I reference that? Val and I think it’s interesting having had a blue-eyed blond-haired girl doing Kabuki! I’m assuming the correction on our great-grandfather is OK as I added and referenced the entry in our genealogical book. Are there other edits needing references? Thanks, Ken Perrine (I’m Kenneth R while our father was Kenneth I). Google me as Dr. Kenneth Perrine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krp2003 ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey thanks for the 'invitation'! I'm actually on the "typo team", but I don't know a quick and easy way to found tons of typos and fix them? I like to do huge volumes of work in spurts. How did you find me by the way? I am flattered. ♥
Oh, and have a cookie if you'd like. They are warm and fresh out of the oven. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 20:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC) |
My edit didn't actually remove the short description, I was just trying to remove the blank line under it. Frankly, it didn't work, because the empty space is still there. Rather than reverting my edit, can you help me complete it? I see no reason for those empty lines between the short description and the beginning of the article. -- JDspeeder1 ( talk) 08:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I saw your note in the edit history for Serenity. I have no issue with you reversing my edits since I forgot to check if I was going over the limit, but is there still room to improve some of the grammatical issues with the plot summary? Any suggestions would be appreciated since I love this movie and want to contribute to this page. -- GenesisMaster ( talk) 12:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The Technical Barnstar | |
You are a wizard! 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 16:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Schazjmd: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ★Trekker ( talk) 23:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
What a beautiful "card", *Treker! I hope you have wonderful holidays as well! Schazjmd (talk) 23:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The New York Times is an unreliable source! 2605:A601:A961:0:D11A:7EB4:85BD:4238 ( talk) 22:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Schazjmd,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk) 15:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
My name is Andrew Bragg and I am an Australian politician. I have disclosed my connection to the page about me, and proposed some additions on the Talk page. There seems to be at least some support for those changes, but 3 months later I’m still having a hard time finding someone to expressly approve/implement the additions or reject them. I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look and consider my proposed additions. AndrewJamesBragg ( talk) 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, just thought it polite to make my previous edit clearer since you notified me about it- when changing the spacing, I saw the footnote you mentioned, viz. 'Writing in 1952, Burgess wrote that Coman was Bates' "dearest companion of her life"', which I thought an extremely odd quote to employ in support of the article's statement "Some scholars believe the two women were a lesbian couple" since the quote itself is so vague and in no way conclusively establishes- one could even argue, in no way very strongly indicates- such a relationship between the two women. On the basis that presumably the other sources cited in support of that statement do so in a more direct manner, I thought removing the vague statement that, frankly, only muddies the waters (by effectively implying that no more direct "they were lesbians"-type statement exists) would strengthen the point being made. You can be the "dearest companion of (a person's) life" without there being any implication of homosexuality, which is why the footnoted quote seems strange as a choice to include. Surely- if such exists, which one imagines is the case given the other citations given- a quote rather less oblique to justify the statement re: the conclusions of some scholars would be far better. Still, I have no horse in the race and made the change on a whim, so no doubt my response is completely unnecessary, but as I say your notification appeared to warrant acknowledgement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.208.8 ( talk) 23:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Timwi Axem Titanium ( talk) 05:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I am Timwi, the editor (technically, admin) who recently engaged in very questionable editing choices and discussion behavior. As you may have seen from the link Axem Titanium provided above, my behavior has landed me in Arbitration and I may soon be losing admin status because of it.
I want to extend my sincerest apologies to you for the way that I treated you. There is no excuse for me targeting a passer-by such as yourself, who was just doing their regular Wikipedia editing in perfectly good faith. I did not pause to consider at the time what impact that must have had on you personally, but I do now, and that fills me with deep regret.
I am not saying this to make myself look good for the Arbitrators. If they decide that I am no longer fit to be admin, then I will accept that and move on. I am saying this because I’ve come to realize that I violated my own principle of striving to foster friendly collaboration in everything I do. This was an egregious personal failing on my part that I’m not going to be able to ignore or shrug off. I will meditate over this and hope to find a way to prevent it from happening again. It is very regrettable that you, a very dedicated and valuable contributor, got caught up in this. You did not deserve that.
If you decided that I embody everything that’s wrong about social interaction on Wikipedia, I understand and I don’t blame you. Nevertheless, for the sake of the greatest collaborative writing project in the world, I sincerely hope that your passion and dedication to the project continue unimpeded. Wikipedia deserves good people like you. — Timwi ( talk) 07:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I had removed most of her Wikipedia page and I am almost entirely certain she wrote it herself to promote herself with her work. That is why I removed the abundance of quotes and photos, because even established actors don’t have all that. Wikipedia is not for promoting oneself, only to give information about something which is why I left in the basic facts about her. Nfhh5 ( talk) 10:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The reason there is no article for Russell Meyers was because I accidentally made a typo. This is the article I was trying to link: Russell Myers — Preceding unsigned comment added by SouthParkFan65 ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
And what a fun user page. Boy do I hear that. The oldest extant version may be from the 13th century, but I'll bet it's a couple of millennia older and no doubt it's today's news. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 18:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Can I ask for your reason for this edit please? I couldn't quite tell which of the 19 points in WP:ELNO applied. Thank you! Rebroad ( talk) 20:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for being one of the MOST helpful editors that I have literally ever come across on the encyclopedia! Many are just bullies, but you are great!
♥
Th78blue (
talk)♥ 15:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I wouldn't have edited his page if it wasn't true. You can put the word "was" back in now: https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2022/04/05/philadelphia-legend-bobby-rydell-wildwood-days-singer-dies/ Kubrickrules ( talk)
Then don't. But Fabian, and other friends of his, are already posting about it on social media. It happened, and someone else will most likely edit it less than ten minutes from now. Suit yourself, though. Kubrickrules ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello SchreiberBike | ⌨ , hope you're doing fine. I appreciate your efforts on improving pages like these. You recently reverted the information I added about the page owner's award and his company that is newly founded. I came across the link and I thought it was notable enough to be included on Wikipedia citation. Is it not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.202.228 ( talk) 19:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
How should I present this information then? The game itself does not have a Wiki article, yet it seems to me that there should be a link for interested parties, however it is not clear that it is central enough to the main topic to include it in the "External links". SlySven ( talk) 16:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your patience in letting me address your concern satisfactorily. As well as your thanks in acknowledgment. I know I’ve run into you before somewhere along the line, perhaps merely seeing your name in edit histories, but you are a credit here to WP:Civil. ;) Wikiuser100 ( talk) 22:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Right on! Wikiuser100 ( talk) 22:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Normally I do not pay attention to venting or attacks and I have been called much worse but my concern was them doing to it someone else such as another reviewer. Thanks for reporting and to @ Wikipelli: for doing their best to warn them. S0091 ( talk) 00:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Both me, you + others have made edits including references to LA Times, NY Times, Vanity Fair. I don't want to remove the notability tag that you put on the page without checking with you first. If you think this page now meets the criteria, can you remove? If not, let me know here and I will try and find more sourced material. Feel free to delete this section if the tag is removed and everything Ok. Thanks. Nicolas.hammond ( talk) 18:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the edits! I might have noticed that mistake later - with emphasis on "might". Glad to see I'm not the only contributor here. DanielC46 ( talk) 15:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Maybe since you just helped me, you might be able to help me with correctly adding "categories"? I just added some to that last article here, and would appreciate if you'd take a look to see if I added them properly in the wiki-markup? Thanks! ♥ Th78blue ( talk)♥ 22:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Paper encyclopedias are full of informative, concise stubs. Finished permastubs likewise don't need expansion.That seems to apply in many cases that perhaps we are neglecting about some companies that aren't quite Coca Cola? ♥ Th78blue ( talk)♥ 23:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Th78blue, a good place to start writing articles is WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Places on the National Register of Historic Places are generally considered notable, and there's a helpful WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Style guide to help you get started. You can pick an area you're interested in, like National Register of Historic Places listings in Coconino County, Arizona, pick a red-link, and write an article for it. Schazjmd (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
This admin has not edited since May. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
administrator, VRT permissions agent, 44366 edits since: 23 November 2009, last edit on 3 May 2022. My apologies for not double-checking. Schazjmd (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Grammar: When to use “bad” and “badly” in English. Does the food taste bad or badly ? Thank you for reverting that annoyance ..a token of my appreciation. 2022 MAY- (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
8TH OF MAY 2022 (UTC) |
For you, since I'll need one too after this brutal AfD! One of my first articles, and been really trying to keep it alive even as a stub... but that is proving more and more difficult by the moment. Thanks for reviewing anyway... ♥ Th78blue ( talk)♥ 00:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC) |
I appreciate your support and trust in my recent run for admin. I've had an interesting first few weeks and am learning a lot by being able to better watch (through tools) what admins do. At first, I'm stepping my toes into the AIV arena but watching backlogs. Please call on me if you see making an error, or if you just need help. Thanks again. BusterD ( talk) 17:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
So I did not know that the collision was already in the article since another person said it wasn’t true, so I decided to clear things up and say to him that it is true. Once that was done, I started working on the collision part. And yes, it can be in the lead, because it is talking about the other galaxies nearby the Milky Way, and also since it was sort of a perfect place to fit it in. So I also want your opinion - do you think it should be in the lead, it can be, I dunno what you confirmed users want…
-Pixomite Pixomite ( talk) 22:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
I removed that section because it violates wikipedia's NPOV. The sources are not worthy of inclusion. Thanks 2600:8805:C980:9400:6CA5:272F:8B6C:F6C6 ( talk) 20:06, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't know what I can do against this disruptive user: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Amusement_Park&action=history You opened a thread in talk page to tell stop edit warring, I justified everything in talk page with more than a dozen of sources, user couldn't dispute any of them and stopped participating. And as such, I made adjustments per talk page and also added some new info with source. He just destroyed all of them by reverting with a complete destruction with his disruptive behaviour. I did everything in line with rules, I extensively justified everything in talk page. He removed an information by another user by declaring "box office magazine" as not reliable and then my new additions with his complete reversion with a nonsense summary without any care. I added a new info along with a source, and adjustments I made "reflects the references" and justified in talk page extensively. He's reverting with "Rv to version which reflects the references". My adjustments -reflects- the references. This is trolling at this point and very disruptive. He "owns" the article and stubbornly sticks to the his inaccurate initial edits and do not let anyone to make adjustments despite it's justified with a dozen of sources. Tehonk ( talk) 16:19, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
the link given by admin yesterday was saying "active block", it's over, there is no active block... Tehonk ( talk) 22:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but how do I add a talk or comment section? News sources say some people received the award the article is about, but not what year, and I don't know what to do about it. I was going to leave a comment in the talk section, but I don't know how to do that? InezSerrano ( talk) 00:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
I think I figured it all out, thank you so much. If you have the time to review my changes to the article tomorrow, I'd welcome it. Good Night! InezSerrano ( talk) 01:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd, thanks for telling me about my edit on Chinese People. I'll keep your lecture in mind. Next time I won't add wikilinks to subsections. Best, Twilight Sparkle 222 ( talk) 09:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for reverting that annoyance on my userpage - I hadn't even noticed their return to bother me about the RfA. Please accept this token of my appreciation. ♠Vami _IV†♠ 13:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC) |
Thanks for fixing the age template on Angela Paxton. -- 76.14.39.120 ( talk) 02:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
On 15 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Charlotte Johnson Wahl, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 17:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd. You just sent me this message: "I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elvis Francois, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 22:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)"
-- The source that was included in the edit includes all of the information I edited/added. As the source was from Rolling Stone, I would imagine this is a reliable source. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzurn ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for your reply! It looks like the "Zach Zurn" information was not there - that is correct. But both reference numbers 1 and 4 mentioned the album being recorded at Carpet Booth Studios.
Reference 1: Dr. Elvis Francois, an orthopedic surgery resident at the Mayo Clinic, records a song at Carpet Booth Studios in Rochester, Minn.
Reference 4: A few days after their call, the surgeons were in Rochester’s Carpet Booth Studios cutting “Imagine” and “Lean on Me,” along with Mike Yung’s “Alright” and Andra Day’s “Rise Up.” The R&B singer’s inspiring lyrics — “I’ll rise like the day … I’ll rise unafraid” — are a regular in the Robinson’s rotation.
I will submit another edit without the Zach Zurn edit. Thank you! Zzurn ( talk) 22:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello. The Australian PM said the submarines would not need to be refueled during its lifetime. The Guardian article states that the French nuclear vessels have to be refueled every 10 years because they use non-weapons-grade uranium. Regards. Trigenibinion ( talk) 22:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Schazjmd. Hope this finds you well? I was hoping you might have a minute to take a look here. Thanks so much in advance. Daizypeach ( talk) 14:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
I accept that made mistakes. But earlier a user who warned me warned Vucein also but they started accusing them also claiming they do correct edits. And I saw their contributions. They just remove things from every page they edit. But they need to understand that Anupamaa is an on-air show. And it's story will increase. And the plot which they remove in the name of last stable is more than 1 month old as I'm the regular viewer of the show. Even they use prefixes like Baa and Bapuji as nicknames which is wrong. And remove nicknames and post marital surnames of some characters. Add unsourced ratings. And remove even info about 2 tracks for whom they were made. Is this behaviour nice??? Pra2310 ( talk) 19:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Vucein doesn't agree to anyone. They just think they're perfect. Atleast I'm accepting my mistakes. But they doesn't. You may visit their talk page. Where discussion Anupamaa on 30 held Pra2310 ( talk) 03:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
see Vucein isn't ready to talk and constantly removing necessary plot. Removing plot which is more than 1 month old. Removing necessary info from cast and soundtrack section and not willing to come on talk page. Then what could I do Pra2310 ( talk) 15:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for the suggestion Pra2310 ( talk) 00:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pra2310’s version contains over detailed plot additions. They keep adding unnecessary details which do not belong in the plot section. It is supposed to be summed up as per Wikipedia rules. And their additions in the soundtrack section are purely fancruft. They need to stop promoting SaNan, aka the ship name of two characters of the show. Wikipedia doesn't allow this. It is isn’t fandom.com for the user to keep on doing this. Vucien ( talk) 07:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Oh really @Vucien. I visited your talk page. You engage in war edit with everyone. I just engaged with you. Well I'll not use ship name. It's my fault. But atleast don't remove info about the tracks for whom they were made. They were purely meant for Samar and Nandini. And don't remove plot to more than 1 month old track. I'm a regular viewer of show since beginning. Remember it's an on-air show. If you want to condense plot then go to Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein page. There everything is detailed. Pra2310 ( talk) 14:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Pra2310 you need to stop adding over detailed plot to the section. You cannot add everything that happens in a show to the plot section. Go read Wikipedia’s guidelines about conciseness and word limit. Vucien ( talk) 08:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
When you find copied text thats CC or PD compatible, don't forget the {{ CC-notice}} (or {{ PD-notice}} templates to properly attribute the text. Sennecaster ( Chat) 20:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi for the page Haraldskær Woman I added a link on "The Cultural Museum" because I am sure there's many The Cultural Museums in the world. the The Cultural Museum of in central Vejle, Denmark didn't have a wiki page so instead I pasted an external link from what I thought was the official website. That's the reason behind me adding the external link. Thanks for your time-- LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 13:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, so external links from the official organisation is a no no? LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 15:08, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Indeed, thanks a lot! LostCitrationHunter ( talk) 16:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
This user Buffalo8 deliberately rigged one page An American Tail: The Treasure of Manhattan Island by deleting true sources as grammatical errors. I’ve saw the end of the film as it stated the Native American cultures were researched from Stockbridge Munsee Community and he deleted it like it was rubbish. I’m having a nervous breakdown. Could you please set things straight to him for me? Retrosunshine2006 talk 18:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry. I did not know. I thought he was vandalizing. I’ll know next time before editing. BTW, An American Tail is my favorite film series. Retrosunshine2006 talk 18:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 13:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I have been talking with another editor about the Feynman Technique and its association with Feynman and can't seem to find any viable source despite the publicity behind it. I was thinking about removing most of the citations as they are quite poor and noticed you removed one from medium. The first instance of the technique that I can find on the internet is a youtube video back in 2012, I can't seem to find anything before that. I am thinking of putting some of the science behind the technique on the page. What are your thoughts on the current citations? I am a new editor so apologies for the errors :) DannyHatcher ( talk) 00:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, i accept that i made a mistake by adding the link in 2 related articles. But i was only reading related article and if i find something where i can add the reference i added them. In the case of waistcoat ( /info/en/?search=Waistcoat ) article there was no citation added there and it said citation needed. The link i added had the picture of same design product so i added it there. i would also like to ask is the website i added not trustworthy or is it that we can only add article as citation? Wajahat elahi ( talk) 08:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
The variant of the clergy cassock may be cut as a vest. It differs in style from other waistcoats in that the garment buttons to the neck and has an opening that displays the clerical collar.. Your link offered nothing to make that information verifiable. In the Jeans article, the information that needed a source was
The production of jeans with a "used look" can be more environmentally damaging than regular jeans,. A link to a page to buy a pair of jeans does not help readers verify the information.You should read WP:RS to learn more about the types of sources that are appropriate for Wikipedia articles. When you find a source and aren't sure whether it would be considered a reliable source, check WP:RSPS to see if it's been discussed; if it isn't listed there, you can ask at WP:RSN.If you have questions as you learn to edit articles, you're welcome to ask me here, and you can also get useful advice at WP:TEAHOUSE. Hope that helps! Schazjmd (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
I have posted a reply on my talk page where you posted. deisenbe ( talk) 21:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for doing the redirect, I am still new to editing and didn't know how to do it. I was going to look into it tomorrow. Could you give me a quick run down about how and what you did? DannyHatcher ( talk) 22:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Content copied from (name of article), see that article's history for attribution. Because I wrote a new sentence in the Learning by teaching article, I didn't need to attribute it.Occasionally, an article simply duplicates information elsewhere and shouldn't be a stand-alone article. Then you just replace the content with the redirect syntax to the correct target. Hope that helps! Drop by here anytime if you have more questions. Schazjmd (talk) 22:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | |
In the past for all the numerous times you have openly rebuked me about my shortcomings and simultaneously defended me when the need arose, it takes a true friend to chastise and tell their friends the truth. Thank you so much, you have made me a better me. Celestina007 ( talk) 02:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC) |
Mrdnartdesign ( talk) 16:47, 24 November 2021 (UTC)mrdnartdesign . Thanks for the tip. My first chatting re. a dispute!
Dear Schazjmd: Do you know how I can delete every addition, every edit, everything I ever contributed to this site? After today, I want nothing to do with it. Mrdnartdesign ( talk) 20:55, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to know what you mean by for children parameter, use number for properly sourced number of children? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UpsidedownVal ( talk • contribs) 01:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I find this confusing because I have never once seen a wiki page where there are numbers in place of names for children. Moreover, I see bulks of pages that not only contain the names of the children rather than numbers, but contain names of children with no wiki page and/or no notoriety. Can you please direct me to where the information on listing children is? I'd also like to add that the revisions in question by Didoo1 are not in regards to whether her child, Stanton LaVey is notable (of which he does happen to be and I am working on his page now), but in regards to the user's reasoning which is personal rather than factual. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UpsidedownVal ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. I read this as the parameters: Typically the number of children (e.g., 3); only list names of independently notable or particularly relevant children. Names may be preceded by a number to show total children and avoid implying that named children are the only offspring. For multiple entries, use an inline list. For privacy reasons, consider omitting the names of living children, unless notable. For the sake of the argument you are putting forth, Stanton LaVey is both notable and relevant. However, I will be changing my edit of the page to say "1" since there is no wiki page of Stanton LaVey. If Didoo1 tries to undo this edit I will create another report as that goes right back to the reason for my report to begin with which is that Didoo1 is using personal reasons rather than factual ones which negates neutrality. Thank you for all your feedback. [1] [2] [3] UpsidedownVal ( talk) 03:17, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
References
Hi Schazmd, Thanks for your note. I’m a newbie to Wiki edits so I don’t know how to reference or which changes I made need documentation. I’m Valerie’s brother, so some of what I added is from personal interaction and family history. E.g., Val spent 1945-49 in Japan with our folks and indeed danced Kabuki but how do I reference that? Val and I think it’s interesting having had a blue-eyed blond-haired girl doing Kabuki! I’m assuming the correction on our great-grandfather is OK as I added and referenced the entry in our genealogical book. Are there other edits needing references? Thanks, Ken Perrine (I’m Kenneth R while our father was Kenneth I). Google me as Dr. Kenneth Perrine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krp2003 ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey thanks for the 'invitation'! I'm actually on the "typo team", but I don't know a quick and easy way to found tons of typos and fix them? I like to do huge volumes of work in spurts. How did you find me by the way? I am flattered. ♥
Oh, and have a cookie if you'd like. They are warm and fresh out of the oven. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 20:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC) |
My edit didn't actually remove the short description, I was just trying to remove the blank line under it. Frankly, it didn't work, because the empty space is still there. Rather than reverting my edit, can you help me complete it? I see no reason for those empty lines between the short description and the beginning of the article. -- JDspeeder1 ( talk) 08:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
I saw your note in the edit history for Serenity. I have no issue with you reversing my edits since I forgot to check if I was going over the limit, but is there still room to improve some of the grammatical issues with the plot summary? Any suggestions would be appreciated since I love this movie and want to contribute to this page. -- GenesisMaster ( talk) 12:45, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The Technical Barnstar | |
You are a wizard! 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 16:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC) |
Hello Schazjmd: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ★Trekker ( talk) 23:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
What a beautiful "card", *Treker! I hope you have wonderful holidays as well! Schazjmd (talk) 23:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The New York Times is an unreliable source! 2605:A601:A961:0:D11A:7EB4:85BD:4238 ( talk) 22:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Schazjmd,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk) 15:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
My name is Andrew Bragg and I am an Australian politician. I have disclosed my connection to the page about me, and proposed some additions on the Talk page. There seems to be at least some support for those changes, but 3 months later I’m still having a hard time finding someone to expressly approve/implement the additions or reject them. I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look and consider my proposed additions. AndrewJamesBragg ( talk) 02:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, just thought it polite to make my previous edit clearer since you notified me about it- when changing the spacing, I saw the footnote you mentioned, viz. 'Writing in 1952, Burgess wrote that Coman was Bates' "dearest companion of her life"', which I thought an extremely odd quote to employ in support of the article's statement "Some scholars believe the two women were a lesbian couple" since the quote itself is so vague and in no way conclusively establishes- one could even argue, in no way very strongly indicates- such a relationship between the two women. On the basis that presumably the other sources cited in support of that statement do so in a more direct manner, I thought removing the vague statement that, frankly, only muddies the waters (by effectively implying that no more direct "they were lesbians"-type statement exists) would strengthen the point being made. You can be the "dearest companion of (a person's) life" without there being any implication of homosexuality, which is why the footnoted quote seems strange as a choice to include. Surely- if such exists, which one imagines is the case given the other citations given- a quote rather less oblique to justify the statement re: the conclusions of some scholars would be far better. Still, I have no horse in the race and made the change on a whim, so no doubt my response is completely unnecessary, but as I say your notification appeared to warrant acknowledgement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.208.8 ( talk) 23:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Timwi Axem Titanium ( talk) 05:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I am Timwi, the editor (technically, admin) who recently engaged in very questionable editing choices and discussion behavior. As you may have seen from the link Axem Titanium provided above, my behavior has landed me in Arbitration and I may soon be losing admin status because of it.
I want to extend my sincerest apologies to you for the way that I treated you. There is no excuse for me targeting a passer-by such as yourself, who was just doing their regular Wikipedia editing in perfectly good faith. I did not pause to consider at the time what impact that must have had on you personally, but I do now, and that fills me with deep regret.
I am not saying this to make myself look good for the Arbitrators. If they decide that I am no longer fit to be admin, then I will accept that and move on. I am saying this because I’ve come to realize that I violated my own principle of striving to foster friendly collaboration in everything I do. This was an egregious personal failing on my part that I’m not going to be able to ignore or shrug off. I will meditate over this and hope to find a way to prevent it from happening again. It is very regrettable that you, a very dedicated and valuable contributor, got caught up in this. You did not deserve that.
If you decided that I embody everything that’s wrong about social interaction on Wikipedia, I understand and I don’t blame you. Nevertheless, for the sake of the greatest collaborative writing project in the world, I sincerely hope that your passion and dedication to the project continue unimpeded. Wikipedia deserves good people like you. — Timwi ( talk) 07:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I had removed most of her Wikipedia page and I am almost entirely certain she wrote it herself to promote herself with her work. That is why I removed the abundance of quotes and photos, because even established actors don’t have all that. Wikipedia is not for promoting oneself, only to give information about something which is why I left in the basic facts about her. Nfhh5 ( talk) 10:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The reason there is no article for Russell Meyers was because I accidentally made a typo. This is the article I was trying to link: Russell Myers — Preceding unsigned comment added by SouthParkFan65 ( talk • contribs) 01:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
And what a fun user page. Boy do I hear that. The oldest extant version may be from the 13th century, but I'll bet it's a couple of millennia older and no doubt it's today's news. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 18:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Can I ask for your reason for this edit please? I couldn't quite tell which of the 19 points in WP:ELNO applied. Thank you! Rebroad ( talk) 20:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for being one of the MOST helpful editors that I have literally ever come across on the encyclopedia! Many are just bullies, but you are great!
♥
Th78blue (
talk)♥ 15:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
I wouldn't have edited his page if it wasn't true. You can put the word "was" back in now: https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2022/04/05/philadelphia-legend-bobby-rydell-wildwood-days-singer-dies/ Kubrickrules ( talk)
Then don't. But Fabian, and other friends of his, are already posting about it on social media. It happened, and someone else will most likely edit it less than ten minutes from now. Suit yourself, though. Kubrickrules ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello SchreiberBike | ⌨ , hope you're doing fine. I appreciate your efforts on improving pages like these. You recently reverted the information I added about the page owner's award and his company that is newly founded. I came across the link and I thought it was notable enough to be included on Wikipedia citation. Is it not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.107.202.228 ( talk) 19:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
How should I present this information then? The game itself does not have a Wiki article, yet it seems to me that there should be a link for interested parties, however it is not clear that it is central enough to the main topic to include it in the "External links". SlySven ( talk) 16:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your patience in letting me address your concern satisfactorily. As well as your thanks in acknowledgment. I know I’ve run into you before somewhere along the line, perhaps merely seeing your name in edit histories, but you are a credit here to WP:Civil. ;) Wikiuser100 ( talk) 22:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Right on! Wikiuser100 ( talk) 22:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Normally I do not pay attention to venting or attacks and I have been called much worse but my concern was them doing to it someone else such as another reviewer. Thanks for reporting and to @ Wikipelli: for doing their best to warn them. S0091 ( talk) 00:07, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Both me, you + others have made edits including references to LA Times, NY Times, Vanity Fair. I don't want to remove the notability tag that you put on the page without checking with you first. If you think this page now meets the criteria, can you remove? If not, let me know here and I will try and find more sourced material. Feel free to delete this section if the tag is removed and everything Ok. Thanks. Nicolas.hammond ( talk) 18:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the edits! I might have noticed that mistake later - with emphasis on "might". Glad to see I'm not the only contributor here. DanielC46 ( talk) 15:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Maybe since you just helped me, you might be able to help me with correctly adding "categories"? I just added some to that last article here, and would appreciate if you'd take a look to see if I added them properly in the wiki-markup? Thanks! ♥ Th78blue ( talk)♥ 22:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Paper encyclopedias are full of informative, concise stubs. Finished permastubs likewise don't need expansion.That seems to apply in many cases that perhaps we are neglecting about some companies that aren't quite Coca Cola? ♥ Th78blue ( talk)♥ 23:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Th78blue, a good place to start writing articles is WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Places on the National Register of Historic Places are generally considered notable, and there's a helpful WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Style guide to help you get started. You can pick an area you're interested in, like National Register of Historic Places listings in Coconino County, Arizona, pick a red-link, and write an article for it. Schazjmd (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
This admin has not edited since May. VernoWhitney ( talk) 17:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
administrator, VRT permissions agent, 44366 edits since: 23 November 2009, last edit on 3 May 2022. My apologies for not double-checking. Schazjmd (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Grammar: When to use “bad” and “badly” in English. Does the food taste bad or badly ? Thank you for reverting that annoyance ..a token of my appreciation. 2022 MAY- (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
8TH OF MAY 2022 (UTC) |
For you, since I'll need one too after this brutal AfD! One of my first articles, and been really trying to keep it alive even as a stub... but that is proving more and more difficult by the moment. Thanks for reviewing anyway... ♥ Th78blue ( talk)♥ 00:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC) |