![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey man I understand, If you dont like T.I., ok, he is well-known as the king of da south, everybody in the hip hop industry now that T.I. has been compared with tupac , of course wikipedia is angry with T.i. since get back up (song). t.i. said in many interviews that he has multi-platinum albums, trap muzik and king in july 2010 was 2x platinum, paper trail has been 3x platinum as july 2012. no mercy sold over one million in the US as december 2012. of course chris brown x album is irrelevant for u , but you have to think in the Fans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.12 ( talk) 22:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
So it appears he's not sticking with the 3Krazy moniker, as he has released "F.D.B." and "Notorious", two songs from his upcoming mixtape, under the name Young Dro. You mind changing it back?
Yeah we made a change for the new producer we have if you can put it back up plz thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jperez92 ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
HHH Pedrigree has also been apart on the edit war. I keep editing the page because he keeps trying to redirect the page because he does believe its noticeable enough which it is since they are appearing at the companys big event of the year where only the important people appear. So could you please that the ban off? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ8946 ( talk • contribs) 21:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Uh yeah i was just uploading higher quality versions, and i will upload the Hotel California deluxe in a sec. Koala15 ( talk) 23:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh wait should we just change the artwork to the one with just the tiger, i'm confused because different websites are still using both. Koala15 ( talk) 23:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
The file could be glitched, i already uploaded the one with tiger so will use that. Koala15 ( talk) 23:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I figured out how to see what you had changed.
FWIW, both ASCAP and the Harry Fox Agency (which are official licensing sources) show that there were either 3 or 4 writers on STARTED FROM THE BOTTOM. I did not post a specific resource due to the fact that, unfortunately, the two sources don't agree and both of the sources require a click through approval, so I was not able to provide a direct link to the information. That said, please feel free to take a look at what ASCAP and Harry Fox have listed, and decide what you think is best. You will see that there is no question about Noah "40" Shebib being one of the writers.
https://www.ascap.com/Home/ace-title-search/index.aspx
http://www.harryfox.com/songfile/public/publicsearchresults.do?forward=drilldown&index=0
Mohansen11 ( talk) 00:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
HipHopDx said Mike Zombie was the sole producer; http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/singles/id.23605/title.Drake-Started+From+The+Bottom
Rolling Stone said Noah "40" Shebib was the sole producer; and http://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/drake-works-his-way-up-in-started-from-the-bottom-20130211
Rap Up says they both produced it: http://www.rap-up.com/2013/01/31/drake-set-to-release-new-single-on-grammy-night/
Mohansen11 ( talk) 01:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I get what your saying, but wikipedia is having a major lag when you overwrite a file it just doesn't update so instead of wasting my time i just upload a reduced version on a new file, i don't see the big deal. Koala15 ( talk) 17:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Yep when you overwrite an existing file it just doesn't update, it's been happening everywhere. Koala15 ( talk) 20:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your time.
The picture is one that Travis personally asked me to upload to his Wikipedia page.
How do i upload this without any trouble? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Millyman77 ( talk • contribs) 03:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Yeah that looks good i will use that from now on, though some albums only get like 2 weeks on the charts so the "since" thing makes sense there. Koala15 ( talk) 22:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
yea just because a record is publicized produced by a producer doesn't make it true. blogs make mistakes. album credits will reveal this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 22:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
a blog site does not count as a reliable source . whats an email i can reach you at ? the record was improperly publicized and another producer is taking credit that is undeserved . its honestly not that serious . but i would like to understand what levels do we need to take this to ? management or legal team ? do i need RCA to contact you and show you proof of what i'm saying ? do i need to send you split sheets for the song ? Chris is not mentioning Arthur in any interviews . and the interview that you provided to site that it is going to be a bonus track on iTunes does not mention Arthur anywhere in it . there are only 2 creative individuals on that song . Glass John and Chris Brown . no other producers or writers . so tell me what you need and we can take care of it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 06:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
i just read what i wrote i do not a see what part of that paragraph you could possibly consider a threat . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 22:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
never said his legal team. i was asking if you need to see legal documentation. or to be contacted by management. relax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 06:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Also have you yet gave any type of URL source backing your edits? No you have not. STATic message me! 14:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Why would you remove the deluxe edition cover from Finally Rich? It is not similar at all, i can see when its the same cover just a different color but this ones totally different. I think you might taking the wikipedia handbooks out of context. Koala15 ( talk) 02:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I really don't think they look similar, and what you are saying is just based off of your opinion. If you really care that much start a conversation on the Finally Rich talk page about it and see if other people agree with you. Koala15 ( talk) 02:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you knew anything about Logic's mixtape pages being redirected to his main wiki page? Thanks! NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 16:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, thanks once again! NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 21:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Yeah i get it now. Koala15 ( talk) 18:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello i have been making changes to the OVO page. Thanks for making it! I just wanted to update 2 pictures but dont know how. Can I send the pictures to you by email? The pictures are the OVO Owl logo and the OVO Fest logo! thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tovonxo ( talk • contribs) 00:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Okay kool also ad the ( OVO fest logo ) picture as well with the OVO fest part! if you have time thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tovonxo ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Check this out, I made changed to Enough Said by Aaliyah & Drake because the companies (Blackground & OVO) are under Warner Bros. and Interscope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
And it says on the Aaliyah Enough Said artwork cover it has the Blackground & OVO logo which both have distributing companies over them.
I made that OVO page if that was alright with you. I just don't wanna get blocked you know?
Chris Brown says he will turn 24 when the album comes out, suggesting that's when it's going to be released.-- Laun chba ller 14:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
So what's the deal with all of the edits? I'm not picking and choosing to change a few select articles. Other articles had that format for discographies and I was just also copying it. I cannot go to every single artist and do it. There are too many. That's why I was doing them one at a time more or less. So stop changing the edits. I'll limit it to the main studio albums, but do not change the format. Everytime I edit on a musical artist's article I run into you. Why is that? Banan14kab ( talk) 21:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey! This album stream is authorized by the distributing label, Nature Sounds. DJBooth.net is a content publisher, who works directly with record labels to provide their platform for authorized streaming. BZisook ( talk) 17:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Brian Zisook, 4/23/2013.
I'm sorry, but how could you say that an album being released for stream is not notable? In today's music industry, with a newfound importance placed on streaming music, the availability of an album in stream form is both newsworthy AND notable. News articles were written about Justin Timberlake's decision to stream his new album, several weeks before its release, through iTunes. Does this rule only apply to lesser known, not-as-popular artists? BZisook —Preceding undated comment added 21:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Nowhere did I write this was a "rare occurrence." In fact, it is becoming more popular. And yes, there are plenty of reliable sources, for example Rolling Stone or NPR, who also host newsworthy and notable album streams upon release. Here is a link to an article on Rolling Stone. And DJBooth.net IS a reliable source. It is a leading publisher of original music content, part of the Complex Media Network. ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Sir, you asked to see an example of another outlet reporting on the streaming of an album, which I provided for you. In the case of Float, here is a news mention on HipHopDX.com. It is very clear that the issue at hand here is in regard to what makes a publisher of original content a "reliable source". DJBooth.net is not a blog, like the others you listed, but even so to write that a blog cannot be a reliable or proper news source is uninformed and inaccurate. AllHipHop.com is a website in the same media network, similar to DJBooth in that it curates newsworthy, proper and original content. After doing some digging, it states on the [ Links] page, under "Links normally to be avoided," that outbound links about newsworthy topics are allowed, so long as the source is a [ Authority]. DJBooth.net is indeed a recognized authority in urban music. BZisook ( talk) 05:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi StatIc,
You keep deleting the Order of Deaths section for Evil Dead - 2013 Film. For the record, I emailed Wikipedia and ROn Jones confirmed that it does not violate any terms or standards. I have also successfully posted this section on other horror film web pages.
The fact is, the manner and order of kills is a central theme of horror film. People want to know how/why/when people were dispatched. I absolutely intend to keep re-posting this section, it is both central to the plot and provides something that the horror fans want to know. If this doesn't fit, why bother explaining deaths in the long-form plot, or providsing details on Easter Eggs or sub-plots?
Further, you noted that the section is "not sourced." I looked and none of the statements in the plot are sourced... simply because the plot section is created by people who have seen the film and are describing the plot. Though I would be happy to provide the source (the film itself), I do not know what the appropriate method would be. Would be happy to include any "source" you deem worthy. 174.79.35.85 ( talk) 18:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC). Evan
The referenced email:
Wikipedia information team <info-en@wikimedia.org> Apr 13 (13 days ago)
Dear Evan B,
Thank you for your email. Our response follows your message.
04/12/2013 20:08 - Evan B wrote:
> Hi,
> > I am a big fan of horror films. Often, many fans of the genre want to know > how a person in a horror film is dispatched. I have been editing several > pages (most recently - Evil Dead 2013 film) and providing an Order of > Deaths section in the plot to reveal such info. I have noticed that this is > being removed from each page. > > I was curious why? It is part of the plot and I am not using any vulgar > words or phrases to describe what happens? Can someone please explain? > > - Evan
I can't say - you would have to check the history page and see who removed it. It does not violate our policies. However do remember that all data needs to be referenced - if you add large sections and no reference - then it's more than likely that someone will take it out.
Yours sincerely,
Ron Jones
Again, this is not trivia, it is plot. It has been posted on other pages (although, I fear if I direct you to those pages, you will simply delete). Again, I am willing to work with you on formatting and/or citation. Otherwise, we appear to be at a logjam.
You - to my knowledge, are the only person to remove this section. Again, I have yet to read one Wiki page where PLOT has been cited (simply put, it can't be cited as PLOT comes from the viewer reading the material).
I have read this and do not agree that it is trivia. It is substantive referencing both character and plot.
Again, this is substantive information bearing directly on plot. It is as "reliable" as whoever posted the plot itself - or do you think that should be deleted as well since it contains no citation?
I never said my change is "supported," what I said was that the Wiki editors stated it did not violate their policies. The email reflects that directly. Although iut did note that large information sections need to be cited, you have yet to direct me to any plot of a movie that has a citation, nor have you demanded what sort of citation you want. You tell me what citation, and I will make the changes accordingly.
Otherwise, it seems there is no dealing with you. I will continue to post this, and you will continue to delete it. Good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.79.35.85 ( talk) 23:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
So now what. We have two for the change (me and one person on the Talk page) and two against (you and one other person on the talk page). Are we just going to have to engage in an edit war? I did everything you requested and an impasse still seems to exist.
I do not want it to be a war. I do want to include this information. Because you seem to lack basic reading comprehension here is the person's comment:
Sheesh everyone, there's no need to be so harsh. Although trivia is actively discouraged on Wikipedia, this does prove to be some useful information regarding the plot, albeit with major spoilers added in for those who didn't see the movie. In other words, a simple "no" would've sufficed. —stay (sic)! 11:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
This person neither thought it was trivia, nor were they opposed. In fact, this person stated it was useful info. regarding the plot. The "no" was in regards to your tone in your response. It is you who is abrasive and seems to want to wage an edit war. If I wanted a war, I wouldn't have posted to talk, added citations or bothered talking with you. Again, you are the only person to have deleted this section. Clearly, you refuse to be reasoned with despite the fact that I have bent over backwards to work with you. 174.79.35.85 ( talk) 21:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi you wouldn't have happened to delete some of the edits I made did you? Also I appreciate you taking some of the edits and simply creating a new section, I didn't want some of the information to run together.01:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Destiny57 ( talk)
Hi, let's talk about the refs here: Talk:808_Mafia 2Flows ( talk) 23:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
You can see his face, but it isn't a very good shot. It's pretty low quality and you can't really see his face that we'll TBH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DA Fernandez ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted my edit at Twelve Reasons to Die saying that "The Brown Tape" cover would be released to stores. If we add that one then why don't we add the instrumental version, that ones being released to stores also, or the cassette version. I just think this is kind of odd since most editors won't even allow us to add deluxe edition covers even if they are completely different. Koala15 ( talk) 14:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Apparently you think I don't know what I was doing when I removed those entries at the Cashis articles. I removed them as unsourced. I mentioned the non-notable or mixtape part because they didn't have articles of their own where the source would be found. OTOH, apppearences on notable things, which had articles, have sources and didn't need repeated here. Niteshift36 ( talk) 16:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As you said, it would be better to wait for a while. The album was released less than a month ago, so information will appear the next months. You can use Man on the Moon: The End of Day (if it still meeting the GA criteria), or any of the GA you have contributed. It is important the aricle does not include unsourced statements (expecting for plots--if it has--per WP:FILMPLOT) or original research or unsourced "facts". The references shouldn't have bare links, and they should have all possible information: title, author, who made the work (journal, magazine, tv program, etc.) who published the work (generally a company or subsidiary), date, and accessdate. Also, I recommend you to archive urls with WebCite or any other archive site. Some links tend to become dead in a few years, but not most of them. Look at GBooks (in a few years) as offline sources usually write about this, or even search for information offline when it appears. If you believe you don't write very well, contact a WP:GOCE member or trusted-to-you editor who have written FAs/GAs to make a copy-edit of it. Also, you can try to WP:PR it before the GA moment to have comments about it and make easier the GA nomination. Those are tips I can give you for a general GA nomination. Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about the reverts, didn't realize there were comments on the talk page. I've replied to you there, could you check it out there? Andrzejbanas ( talk) 02:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Dude, for the song Crack by 2 Chainz has TM88 & Southside as producers on the 808 Mafia 2 mixtape and said that him and Lex Luger were both working on Flockaveli 2 via instagram.
Brandon TNT West is the producer of Ready Set Go along with Darnell Saadiq Bolden. If you read the actual credits of the album you will see his credit. His publishing information is Truth Knowledge Truth and this and his song credits can be verified by ASCAP. Please see below: READY SET GO FT. MELANIE FIONA (TK. GREENE, S. BOLDEN, B. WEST, M. HALLIM) PENSKILLS MUSIC (BMI)/SONGS OF WINDSWEPT PACIFIC (BMI), ALL RIGHTS ADMINISTERED BY BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC, TRUTH KNOWLEDGE TRUTH (ASCAP), THE LAST MUSICIAN CO (BMI), RONDOR MUSIC PUBLISHING FOR ITSELF AND MIXED CHICK PUBLISHING / MEROKEE MUSIC (SOCAN) / (ASCAP) / TITLE NINE MUSIC (ASCAP) PRODUCED BY SAADIQ BOLDEN FOR CHERRY ANN MUSIC AND BRANDON ‘TNT’ WEST FOR FRANK’S GRANDSONS MUSIC INC. TALIB KWELI VOCALS RECORDED BY ALBY COHEN/ENGINEER AND CHRIS PUMMILL/ASSISTANT ENGINEER AT ROUGH MAGIC STUDIOS, BROOKLYN, NY MIXED BY JASON SCHWEITZER AT MADLANDS STUDIO, LOS ANGELES, CA MASTERED BY DAVE KUTCH/THE MASTERING PALACE, NYC MELANIE FIONA APPEARS COURTESY OF TITLE 9 / SRC / UNIVERSAL REPUBLIC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnt718 ( talk • contribs) 04:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Nobody is being a 'disruptive editor'...seriously. You guys can keep the funny threats to yourselves. Obviously certain people who write these pages go off of what they see online. You should always verify any artist, producer, writer and/ or publishers work and credit properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnt718 ( talk • contribs) 04:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
You guys have eyes and you can read the credits yourself. Buy the album. So we'll keep changing it until you see it for yourself. No need to be difficult just read for yourself and make sure your sources credit properly. ( Tnt718 ( talk) 05:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC))
Seriously don't you or henchmen send ideal threats. We put factual information online that can be found if YOU follow your journalistic responsibility and get info from real sources not something you read online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnt718 ( talk • contribs) 07:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
http://instagram.com/p/WBJ7VchUo_/ On this tracklist, the picture obviously says Blocka at the top.
Also, not to sound bitter or rude but typing out that Owl Pharaoh article took a lot of work and hours out of me so I didn't really appreciate you chopping it down so severely.
Why was Same Shit & Seperated removed from singles? They dropped in 2012 and were originally going to be the first singles on his 13 Album
They're most definitely on iTunes here [3] [4]
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.118.173.200 (
talk) 03:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Static, the sentence you have re-added at the end of the Background section almost exactly matches the last sentence of the article's overview (first paragraph). They're essentially the same thing. Listing guest artist appearances would likely be better suited in the overview section IMO as their mention in the album's Background does not add anything. Perhaps if there was additional information about the how Kweli chose artists for this album, it may provide insight warranting mention in a Background section. What do you think? Charger2 ( talk) 20:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I can put what I want on here I make my own wwe personnel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yorkerman ( talk • contribs) 22:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Dough Pildin is the new single released on May, 13th from his Albert Einstein album he released on soundcloud. He stated in interviews that he didn't have beef with the west coast just Pac, Snoop and Dogg Pound. He had feuds with Jay-Z and Nas in 2001. Lakey the kid in 1999, Tru Life in 2000, Littles in late 2004, Max B in 2008 and Havoc and his cousin Ferg in 2012, if anyone wants to add this stuff to his page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.236.36.116 ( talk) 17:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay buddy i'm not trying to "take your credit" or anything like that i just thought that the article had potential to be a GA. I don't think you really have to have created the whole article to nominate it for GA. When someone nominates an article for GA the reviewer gives suggestions to help bring the article to GA status. So i would have to majorly fix the article anyway, but if it really bothers you that much i'll withdraw it. Koala15 ( talk) 04:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I would like to see where it says you have to be "top contributor" to bring an article to GA status. I recently brought an article to GA status when i was not the top contributor but i made tons of changes necessary to bring the article to GA status. Koala15 ( talk) 04:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, STATic. Thank you for your recent contributions to the discussion and !voting at the VA/E talk page. The wider participation of knowledgeable, well-read, and literate editors is important to the success of the VA/E list's prioritization and updating. I hope you will continue to participate. Your contributions are welcome and appreciated. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 19:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Kris Stephens is signed to GrandHustle records as T.I. stated on his recent visit to 106andPark, can you please put it back because when I added it I messed up the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 02:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
For future reference album covers should be 300 x 300 not 200 x 200. Koala15 ( talk) 18:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Well 200 x 200 looks too small in a infobox and if you tag an image to be reduced a bot reduces it at the end of the day. Koala15 ( talk) 20:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
-- User:STATicVerseatide I am a fan of 50 Cent, i have every different versions of his albums. i keep correcting what is wrong, and it always get deleted by Dan56 and now you!!!!! What can i do then? I'm just helping peaple to see truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil' Click Kla ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
When did it become the norm to go straight to AfD with a redirect, without bothering to have any sort of discussion at all? AfD should be the last resort. It's a viable search term, so deleting it is not the preferred course of action. Niteshift36 ( talk) 21:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
the song was produced by science. j cole said it on the song. I can't cite it from any other source but a lyrics site Wayn12 ( talk) 01:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I recently saw you've removed my edit twice on this page. It states at the end of the video it was directed by Colin Tilley and Drake. I know I didn't quote a source which is likely why you've removed the edit, but it is right there in the credits at the end of the video. A few music sites have also picked up on this too. No worries though, I know it was in good faith.
Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow Lilt ( talk • contribs) 22:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I removed that section because those songs were clearly not released as singles but if you wanna keep false info, we can. Koala15 ( talk) 02:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Yeah i added just the ones released to itunes. Koala15 ( talk) 02:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
"So what? See the link. If the article is nothing except an infobox and tracklist it is not worth having an article." Nearly every album article on Wikipedia is a tracklist and infobox so that statement is inaccurate. When you redirect mixtapes that is ok but when your redirecting an album and strongly believe it should not exist you should probably do an afd for a second opinion. Koala15 ( talk) 14:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Thank you for the help of the hip hop Wikipedia community! Thanks for the amazing articles! Keep it up! 11Block | talk 03:39, 15 June 2013 (UTC) |
Well thank you for including the uncredited vocals section on the album. I did notice that the back of the album doesn't include many of the features, so you were right in removing them from the official tracklist, unless the booklet (if there is one) says they're on it. I just wanted to make sure that the features were included somewhere, so thank you again! Distortiondude ( talk) 18:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
No I'm not crazy, please be more mature when responding to another editor. The statement "many full length free mixtapes" is not true, he released one mixtape which was a compilation of songs that were already released plus an additional 10 new songs, and his only other free mixtape is High Tide which was not "full length" because it is only 5 songs. These are the only songs that are by the artist Harry Fraud, the other mixtapes and songs he is in he is simply credited as a producer. SO this brings us to the Daft Punk remix, which is the first SINGLE that Fraud has released for free over the internet, also one of his first notable songs with the incarcerated Max B. So if you do not respond with the Wikipedia rules which declare that this piece of information is not notable it will be added again to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikopowii ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
What I added to this page was the truth as there are reliable sources on the net but I don't know how to post links on wiki. ink is: http://www.mtvhive.com/2013/06/10/scoop-deville-britney-spears-travis-barker-eminem/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.203.121.232 ( talk) 12:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, STATicVerseatide, you will like this list. 12.168.46.153 ( talk) 16:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I agree that Billboard sometimes use the sales figures for both versions of the song for one charting, they did it with " I'm a Flirt", however, I'm pretty sure Billboard will always denotes the featured artists, and on the charts, "Work" credits Ferg as being the sole artist, not like when the remix of Meek Mill's single "Ima Boss" charted, which listed all the featured guests [5] And I've actually only heard the original play on the radio, but then again I don't listen to too much radio.--User: 1Sire talk 03:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Not intending this to be patronizingly simple, just informative. Complete sentences. The subjects, objects and verbs in WWE 2K14 are fine. It was only the irrelevance I chopped. The article's not about the gaming media or when they get press releases about things and "confirm" them. It's about the game with The Rock on the cover, and Jim Ross voice-acting. You know? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Well it is clear it definitely needs expanding, but that does not mean would should trim it down to the bare minimum. This is definitely not puffing up the article as it is just a longer sentence, not a whole damn paragraph. There is no reason to not include the information, and instead include a fragmented sentence. You are definitely turning it to a mountain accusing me of being pointy when im just improving the article. It not that WWE13 needs work, its that this is proper notable information that should be included. I would not be surprised if 85% of sports video game articles have some information on the cover athlete being chosen. STATic message me! 06:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
As you saw, I put in the notes how there are 3 main masters of Yeezus: the physical, the US digital, and world digital. Yes, I did cite a forum, but it seems important enough to put as a note that there are differences in the different versions of the album, and I have no other source but my own ears and the forum. Any suggestions on how to include it? Distortiondude ( talk) 01:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
may i say y did you edit Mike Posner infobox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XmaxX1212 ( talk • contribs) 07:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure why you think it necessary to include details such as the medium by which an album released is announced. Since the album in question has actually been released all that is needed to be included is that it came out, and perhaps when. Announcements in the run-up (unless they are particularly notable) are not really relevant Otherwise, it reads as "person said a record is going to come out and then that record came out". Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 10:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey just an FYI. I saw your edits on the deadmau5 page. There is currently a discussion regarding his name on the talk page. We have requested a move of the article's title. Feel free to join. MidnightRequestLine ( talk) 15:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
So, you actually think "EW is a way more prestigious reviewer" than COS, fine. But, Fact magazine is more prestigious as being a music magazine than EW and Pitchfork could ever be, so I will be replacing either Pitchfork or EW with Fact. By the way, NY Daily News is more reliable than say The Fly, which is another music magazine. See, I trust music magazines first and foremost, which EW is just anoter generic entertaiment magazine. To me, it goes music magazines (i.e. Fact, The Fly, Rolling Stone), music webzines (i.e. Allmusic, Consequence of Sound, Slant Magazine), newspapers (i.e. The A.V. Club, The Guardian, USA Today), and then entertainment publications (i.e. Entertainment Weekly). We are in fact talking about music, so music-based publications are more reliable and prestigious than just a mere entertainment ones. Sorry, but I judge things to a way, way, way different standard.15:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
T.I. said on 106&Park that they are signed to the label, and said Iggy was still signed to the label months after that was added to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
T.I. said it in a interview that Hustle Gang and Grand Hustle are the same thing check online he said it's just another way to refer to the label like YMCMB to YonngMoney and Cash Money.Look below T.I.'s new videos on Vevo like MemoriesBackThen,With Me, and Doe B's Let Me Find Out Remix, it says HustleGangMusic as the label it's the same as GrandHustleRecords.
Here's a link http://rollingout.com/music/artist-interviews/grand-hustles-newest-artist-kris-stephens-talks-new-single/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 02:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC) And Rich Gang is different as they include non-labelmates T.I. said HustleGangMusic is just a different way to refer to GrandHustle.
Yikes. After I added the NXT championships to the template of WWE Championships, I now see that a whole new template has been created for the NXT championships that also lists the defunct FCW championships. As such do you think we should undo the addition of the NXT championships to the WWE template? Starship.paint ( talk) 05:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I do not understand why Kanye West could not be signed with the label as he has founded the label. Jay-Z has founded Roc Nation and he releases his own albums on Roc Nation. Lil Wayne founded Young Money Entertainment and he releases his own albums on Young Money Entertainment. Thank you for reading this message and please respond! :) 11Block | talk 00:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello.
I know the name of one of J. Cole's original sample that he used for a track off of his new Born Sinner album, but you have deleted my contribution from the page.
What can we do so that this dosen't happen again? You can't say that we need sources, as the other sample names have no links attached to them.
Thanks.
I'm well-aware of the three-revert rule – I understand that I've undone the edit three times, and I have no wish to start an edit war, so from here on I'll cease to do so. If I've annoyed you regarding this, then I apologize. I hope to get this resolved as conflict-free as possible and hope that we can work together constructively in the future. A talk page discussion to determine consensus regarding this issue is the best way to handle this. Cheers, Holiday56 ( talk) 16:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Jimbo Wales Happiness Award |
Doesn't his smile melt your heart? Glossenglocke ( talk) 20:45, 01 October 1953 (UTC) |
I found the "confirmed tracks" for Drake's 3 rd album on Facebook and looks real official.
Has it ever occurred to you that Ralph Folarin sounds a lot like Ralph Lauren? Its a nickname that has taken on a life of its own. Like the article also says, he was born with the first name, Olubowale, or Wale for short. So, "Wale" is not a fake name, as you asserted. I very clearly remember back in 2008 when Wale started using the name Ralph Folarin as a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ropo153 ( talk • contribs) 01:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, seeking advice: On this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Lloyd_Banks&diff=next&oldid=561695259
I left this pointless statement alone, can we just delete those sort of things, rather than having to put it into an archive I guess? Just the documentation scope doesnt sometimes scale down to really quite pages. Or maybe I just getting it wrong.
Reply here is fine thanks.
Thanks for your time.
Jcislowski ( talk) 20:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Although Black Flag isn't officially an album it is still the next piece of work in Machine Gun Kelly's release history, and thus it should still be noted on the "Lace Up" page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaPhenom ( talk • contribs) 00:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I recently created the article titled Black Flag (Mixtape). It may or may not be under review (i'm unsure), can that be put onto the page for Lace Up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaPhenom ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Three sentences came from the MGK page. It's a new mixtape/free album (it depends on who you ask) and it should be allowed to exist as it's own page, just look at Comeback Season by Drake. It has no reviews, and very little information other than the track listing, how does that make this mixtape significant? ThaPhenom ( talk) 01:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
The artist himself as well as Diddy refer to the mixtape as an album, but I already knew Wikipedia wouldn't (that's why I said "free album/mixtape, it depends on who you ask"). I'm simply trying to create a page for this mixtape and add reviews as time passes on. Sadly, the first attempt was redirected into Machine Gun Kelly before I could further edit it. Here's my most recent edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ThaPhenom/sandbox Please let me know what you think, and I would much appreciate anything you'd have to offer regarding how to edit/fix the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaPhenom ( talk • contribs) 02:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks man. I'll be sure to look out for that stuff when it's released. ThaPhenom ( talk) 03:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you care to comment at this discussion over whether the phrase "rave reviews" should be removed from the Yeezus article? It's much ado about nothing, but stubbornness persists. Dan56 ( talk) 14:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, sorry I messed up the MGK info box. I'm alright with the template being deleted but can you add some of the stuff I added to it; regarding the mixtape section and the addition of "Alone" by Sleeping With Sirens to the Featured Singles section? ThaPhenom ( talk) 06:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I prefer the song from Black Flag as well, it seems less forced than "Alone" did. Sorry for being such a hassle the last few days, I'm kinda new to making edits on Wikipedia. "Alone" doesn't have it's own page yet, that's why I linked Feel instead, and the mixtapes were just put on so more people would be aware of them, Rage Pack isn't even mentioned on the page. Thanks for not being rude about all this. ThaPhenom ( talk) 06:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Only reason you won't find Gigwise on Metacritic or ADM is because they don't give any scores in their reviews; it'd be impossible for a review aggregator to use them. 2.127.89.190 ( talk) 02:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Well now it is protected again (thank God) so oh well. STATic message me! 14:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
You are completely justified in your changes, but I don't see how 'Yeezus' can be classed as Hip Hop.... it's Glitch-hop at best... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.6.204 ( talk) 10:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Not really original research, if it was really releasing in 2 weeks then wheres the pre orders, track list or cover? The date was announced in April and i think its safe to say its not happening. Koala15 ( talk) 15:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry STATic, I'm a new Wikipedia user and I was just playing around. I did that because I did not think anybody would go on Kik Messenger. LOL. I am not gay, do not have a Kik account and made that up. Jakesthebest568 Jakesthebest568 ( talk) 23:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Lourdes Rodriguez is apart of Young Money. She's working on a project with Reginae. It's on twitter if you need proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniquelymadeee ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
...in this (my edit) please? — Statυs ( talk, contribs) 04:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
In reply to what you said here the Run the Jewels is available for free download on the record labels website but you can order a physical album here and the album will be released to retail on July 30, as you can see here. So it wouldn't be correct to call it a mixtape since it wasn't released to DatPiff or Livemixtapes. Koala15 ( talk) 03:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
J.Cole's Manager "IB" discusses the sample being Jennifer Hudson's.
Now at least can we agree on it being an uncredited sample by her?
You're right. I'll change the source to the direct Interview from Vibe Magazine:
The criteria states exactly this: "Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs). The standard for inclusion always is that the review meet Wikipedia's guideline for reliable sources and that the source be independent of the artist, record company, etc." So, it has a writing staff with an editorial team in place, and it is independent of the artist they review. I am not going to stop using the site nor others' like it because the WP:ALBUM/REVSIT is outdated and not current, and it should not be sited to restrict because it is not a policy nor a guideline rather an essay. By the way, REVSIT is greatly discriminatory and biased towards Christian magazines even CCM Magazine, Christianity Today, HM, Worship Leader are not on it, so I do not trust REVSIT, when it comes to the Christian genre in the least. Also, is webzines like Jesus Freak Hideout, New Release Tuesday, Indie Vision Music on this list? Nope. Christian Music Zine is not a personal blog in the least! HotHat ( talk) 02:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
I have started the discussion, so lets talk if you want. HotHat ( talk) 07:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank i taught since it doesn't matter to put the internet champion i go stay their and thank o and when i make my favorite wrestlers to WWE TNA ROH u can be the first to message me or message me on my talk or user talk page so when i make it i go make sure u the first one to review or tell me about it Thanks! STATic Verseatide Dyorkerman ( talk) 21:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi STATic Verseatide. I know you've been around here quite a while, but I'm not sure if you're aware of Wikipedia's guideline regarding canvassing...? Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
You have notified 13 editors who support your own position on Deadmau5 and would be expected to support your same position on Tech Nine. This is a problem; you are pulling in a biased sample, or at least it has that appearance. I see that in the discussion at Talk:Deadmau5/Archive 1#Requested move 1 there are still quite a few editors who hold an opinion different than yours who could be invited. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Switch Up is not a single, google it. It was a promotional non-commercial song put out just for his fans, hence why it never charted on the hot 100. So i'm not sure why you changed my edit when it was correct.
No it did not chart on the hot 100, it charted on the irrelevant hip hop rap songs chart an i'm not sure why you think i'm making this up, leave my edit. He tweeted that Switch Up is not a single off the album. Proof: https://twitter.com/BigSean/status/320652626431709184
Just because a song is released on itunes doesn't mean it's a single...have you heard of promotional singles? It's 90% of the time when a single flops (see Love This Life by T.I. (hence does not chart well on the hot 100...(aka only chart that matters realistically). Also, a majority of people barely know anything about the album so of course they call it the 3rd single. The artist himself tweeted that the song is not an official single so i don't know why you insist on being bitter about this.
Last time i'm gonna bother replying to this denial. Every single song that comes out before an album is released is labeled as a "single" by iTunes...they're not gonna put "promotional single" in front of the songs name. My source was literally straight from the artist himself so refuting it is just childish.
Good evening. Till I Die also flopped, but that doesn't mean that the song is not the third single of Fortune. Switch Up is the same; it was released as the second official single, deal with it. Greets -- 188.109.161.47 ( talk) 18:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I added a section called promotional singles due to the fact that he confirmed that they were not singles on twitter (and they didn't make the final track list) so don't flip and change it back because if you look, Beware is the only song that made the final track list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoka1234 ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting Dyorkerman's obvious gimmick infringement on my user page.
I have a sneaking suspicion this guy may be WWEJobber under a sock puppet name, and if it is, he shouldn't be here because he's been banned for mulitple Wiki sins.
Vjmlhds ( talk) 14:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey,
Just wondering, how did you get the message to pop up on your talk page as people leave a message? -- MisterShiney ✉ 19:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Done it...I think lol. -- MisterShiney ✉ 20:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Niteshift36 (
talk) has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Seriously, I agree that whole thing went way too far, way too fast. I've seen your edits elsewhere and at AfD and we are usually in agreement. I apologize for my part in how out of hand that got. Niteshift36 ( talk) 20:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I just replied to the talk page, thanks for bringing it to my attention, I think me personally have his name AUTOGRAPHED TATTOOED on my arm, makes proof enough for it to be moved over, but just in case, i brought up a few points. 2BARQUACK.COM ( talk) 16:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I run web for Taylor Gang Ent. it's not Taylor Gang Records
If the correct path is to create a page for taylor gang ent and redirect taylor gang records to ent I will.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thunkele ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey there. You tell me "There are many many sources that call it that, but thanks for your opioion." but on the Talk page of the film's article you say "A wide variety, if not the majority of these sources do not cite the movie as a comedy at all". Contradicting. Your own research backs my edits, so would you please revert them back? It's very much questionable that the film is a comedy, however it is not questioned at all that's a drama. Presence of humor alone is not a enough to define a comedy as such and that's why most reliable sources (i.e: IMDB) call it a drama. Cataloging it as a comedy will make people come across this movie when looking into, reading about or referencing comedies, and this would be a mistake. Thank you. — Santiago Mendez 06:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkian ( talk • contribs)
Get out of here with that minor edits crap Static. It was a minor edit and you know it. MsScorpioMoon ( talk) 18:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Only we can have a dispute without getting caught :) MsScorpioMoon ( talk) 21:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hey Static, I am Joey's publicist. I asked Jason to make the change, as I am not a member on Wiki. His last name is not Scott. Just Virginie. If you can kindly fix, it would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.85.84.33 ( talk) 21:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Static,
Thought I gave reason when I made the edit but it's possible it didn't go through. His last name isn't Scott. It's Virginie. This was misreported in a few places and has now "stuck." Let me know if you'd like me to restore the edit or if you would prefer to. Thanks!
You are more than welcome to comment on Ground rules. HotHat ( talk) 07:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Are you okay with the current version of Template:Money in the Bank winners, or should it be reverted back to before the IP's edits yesterday so consensus can be reached about what to change before it's changed? — C.Fred ( talk) 00:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Oh, you bet, that's him. In the last month or two, I've seen him active on a few pages I watch, but they weren't vandal edits so I didn't pursue further blocks. But it looks like he's back on the warpath. Tokyo-area IP editing on American hip hop pages, especially discographical information. Chubbles ( talk) 05:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I assumed CritaCal was just some vandal cause i remember a few months ago he was trying to add himself to No Love Lost (Joe Budden album) as you can see the odd message he left on Talk:No Love Lost (Joe Budden album). Koala15 ( talk) 00:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't add it cause he tends not to receive credit as he told me a few times. Even though i haven't seen the linear notes i would assume if he was credited someone would have added it before today. Koala15 ( talk) 00:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Given the sources, I'm surprised that you decided to CSD A7 this, rather than bring it to AfD. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Dr. Dre really is 48 years old -- born February 18, 1965? He has a lot of associated acts. Just saying though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrColonelCortez ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
The album was released to Google Play as a promotional technique kind of similar to Magna Carta Holy Grail but it wasn't released in stores. It's been stated several times that this is is ninth album but Google Play wanted to release it for free as a promotional technique [11]. Koala15 ( talk) 18:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that in an interview MTV Hive Tech N9ne stated his next album was indeed titled 'Special Effects'. I don't really know how this whole Wikipedia thing works. Sorry for not doing it right the first time. Thanks. -Mitchell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchell McGuire ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought that " Switch Up" wasn't a single due to the fact that it hasn't charted well and was never serviced to rhythimic, mainstream radio. Sorry :). Please accept my apology.
Instead of deleting my edits with the justification of "uhmm no", which is just downright disrespectful, how about you actually give a reason for your disagreement with my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icniv ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Moved to User:STATicVerseatide/Template:Joey Badass. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, why do you think that Nottz' Instagram is not a reliable source for the announcement of the project? L225 ( talk) 08:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Some people have been editing MGK's discography page as well as the Black Flag (mixtape) page. I fixed the Black Flag page, but the discography page has had so many edits done that I don't feel confident enough to differentiate good edits from misinformed ones. To summarize the edits: People (mostly unregistered users) are changing Black Flag's status from mixtape to studio album. I tried to explain why i reverted the edits in my latest edit of Black Flag so maybe it will b less likely to happen again, but idk. The discography page still needs editing though, so i'll leave that to you bro. Thanks 4 teaching me this stuff earlier so I could fix it now. ThaPhenom ( talk) 07:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
According to Waka Flocka Flame's main facebook page, the Flockaveli 2 promotional cover has both the BSM and Atlantic Records logo on it. And the page is also verified, just so you know. That's why I put Atlantic on there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs)
Waka still owns stake of 1017 Brick Squad and Brick Squad Monopoly is a subsidiary of 1017 Brick Squad which is now distributed by Atlantic Records. [1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs)
References
Game is signed to Rolex Records and has left Interscope Records, where's your proof of his current label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Where's your proof and if he's in talks he's still not resigned to them. Also what about Rolex Records why did you change that?— Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs)
He's still not signed to Interscope so please move that back to former.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs)
When there's proof of that you can do that but for now he's not apart of Interscope, and Jesus Piece was released under Interscope so therefore they'll release the singles from the album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs)
I would like to know the reason of deletion of "XO & Co. Inc." It is a established Inc. with copyright and should have be granted a article on wiki.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubvirk ( talk • contribs) 03:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
[12] — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaberToothedCat863 ( talk • contribs) 15:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Over at Talk:30 Seconds to Mars. Cheers! § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello STATicVerseatide,
I see you revert edits (Karma Chameleon for example) and you did it right because you have restored my correct revision. Is it possible for you to undo other edits for me please ? I need help. Here's the link where all the "current edits" has to be reverted because they've destroyed my improvements. (I can't undo these edits by myself because I will have problems)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.71.52.42 Synthwave.94 ( talk) 01:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
I think you are wrong, the fact that you don't let me change the genres is ridiculous. First of all, one source is enough to change a genre and second, we are not talking about hip hop. Acording of what you are telling me, we should put Electronic * rock and this is not correct because that is not the genre, the genre is electronic rock and in the same way, electronica is more general and limited. So you should think more about the fact that this is not hip hop, the fact that one VALID source is enough to change the genre and that not necessarily this must have only one or two genres. Thanks. Justasaddream ( talk) 10:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I removed it because the ref you cited says nothing about a studio album...also several artists were signed to CTE and didn't have studio albums...also check iTunes, Gibbs and Scrilla both had studio albums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAMM.CO ( talk • contribs) 14:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
If you're referring to the roster changes...Wikipedia can email me directly and I will email them the release paperwork for each artists that was sent out in 2012. This is an edit handled by admin not a fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAMM.CO ( talk • contribs) 14:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Dude, tons of websites have already reported the track listing like XXL, HipHopDX, Vibe. How are those not reliable you just sound foolish. Koala15 ( talk) 17:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright, but i still can't remember Amazon ever being wrong. Koala15 ( talk) 17:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I currently opened a peer assess for the article Nicki Minaj videography, I was hoping that you could take a look, leave feedback for improvement and contribute to the article where you see it's nessessary. If you can help it would be appreciated. :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Nicki_Minaj_videography/archive1 KaneZolanski ( talk) 12:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm confused, but its okay! Chicago Wiz 16:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Oh! You were saying if the song has charted on the Hot 100 already, then there is no need for the Digital and Airplay because they're basically "adding up to" the Hot 100! I might've confused you there, but I do understand what you're saying now! Chicago Wiz 22:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Although I agree the consensus for infobox album is a little muddled, in principle project access agreed that {{ flat list}} is more accessible than a standard comma-separated lists. On the basis that I had already added {{ flat list}} to Don't Look Down and there is no specific reason for their removal, I've reverted your removal of the template. On the basis that you have removed it because you dislike the template and prefer the way that comma lists look, yet time and effort was made to put the template in place so it shouldnt have been removed. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Great work with Yeezus. Are you planning on getting that to Good status soon, given it's the only album left to make a Kanye West studio albums Good Topic? igordebraga ≠ 02:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey man. FINALLY someone gave Alchemist the picture he needed thank you! But I re-edited it and added back the upcoming projects section. Every one of them is true. Trust me Im a VERY VERY big fan of ALC. I follow him on Twitter with notifications on every Tweet he writs on my iPhone. I know. I even put reference to every thing. Untill now I did ALL of the Alchemist's page a lone. I rebuilt it, added a LOT of writing, wrote ALL the history of his collabs and more. You can look it up in the editing history. Do not come and delete whatever you want just because. It will be much appreciated. -- Orr971 ( talk) 13:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey why did you revert me. I was reverting him. He made an edit which was reverted, and instead of starting a discussion, he blatantly continued warring. Im not the one warring and It shouldnt be my place to start the discussion. If he wants the change made, then he should should start the discussion. I and three other people have warned him and told him to start the discussion. Either the page is supposed ti stay as it was while the discussion is going on. BlackDragon 18:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
But what if there will be more upcoming albums with no date. I think that this note Should be there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orr971 ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Its not my opinion if you listen to the artists then you will realize why i changed the genres, just because there is no link does not stop what you hear. its not disruptive as there is no pop genre added to a metal band page, Hopsin makes positive, alternative and conscious hip hop that's why i added the genres. In the normal broad term hip hop is referring to radio hip hop and Hopsin is an underground artist. as for Unearth, they are not generally "Metalcore" they have thrash tendencies recently and have a metallic hardcore influence of Hatebreed. they have introspective lyrics that make you think, not what modern Metalcore means now talking about relationships and hearbreak. So why change it back when its clearly heard when you listen to them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremevic ( talk • contribs) 18:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
A link for Hopsin? here. And if you don't think "Raw" is positive, then you clearly cant hear. The track "Nocturnal Rainbows" is about being blind to the decay of society and against drug use, that is positive hip hop or Conscious hip hop.
Download" Money and the power" on Itunes. and go to info and you will see " Produced by N4, Ned & Jonathan lauture. "i hold a share of this record" Not sure why my name is not attached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.82.94 ( talk) 06:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
What do you need? Who do you need to speak to in order for my credit to remain. I feel like Wikipedia & the ITUNES Download are that strongest source of information regarding my credit. Wikipedia is relying on other blog sites for their information but these blogs sites are missing info like my credit. I can a sure you that it wont be a problem having my name attached because i did produce this record, N4 and Ned know this. I own a Share of this record! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatproducer ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
What would you need. Someone From the Label to contact you? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.194.22.132 (
talk) 06:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Yo, so why can't I put mixtape articles up here. I've always looked at an artist's discography or whatever, seen that there mixtape doesn't have a page and wished that there was, so that I could see you know like who the producers are, the actual tracklisting. I mean Gucci Mane's comes out with a new mixtape his shit's on here, I don't see why Yelawolf's can't be. And the way I see it, isn't more information better? It's not like I'm deleting important album articles and replacing them with mixtape ones. But it's your call, much love brother.
Alright, I understand now, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckT187 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
"So you made it longer?" isn't exactly as civil as you ask others to be in your "rules," but I will rewrite to keep it under 700 words. It's better to have a coherent synopsis than what was there. Could you please explain why you hadn't tagged it before now? It was too long according to the guidelines as it was then, too. PacificBoy 20:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I think you've misunderstood my point. I didn't claim that we should label these band pages as solely "
rock". I just thought that your reason for removing the two other genres was the "aim for generality" issue. Thank you.
Myxomatosis57 (
talk) 18:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, EleventhBlock. I am wondering whether you think it would be okay to remove the date "August 20, 2013" due to the fact that the date is a week away and a cover art and a track listing hasn't been released. Hall of Fame is being released two weeks from today and a track listing and a track listing has been released days ago. Sounds unrealistic. 11Block | talk 22:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to message you in terms of an edit request on the Trap Lord article, the debut album from Asap Ferg. I am requesting if you would be able to add production credits to the track Cocaine Castle on the track list within the article. The song is produced by Subdaio and HighClassFilth. The credits are actually on Twitter you can search them. It would be great if you can do this simple edit. You can look up these two producers on Google etc, they are both accredited and well respected up-comers.
Twitter credits: [18]
I'm hoping to hear a response back from you soon, thanks!
Njdon89 ( talk) 02:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Here you go: Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://soundcloud.com/subdaio/cocaine. Drum pattern was made by Subdaio. The synths were made by HighClassFilth. They both teamed up to work on the production. You can read it in the beat description.
Njdon89 (
talk) 20:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok cool, I guess we will wait til the album releases with the production credits in the booklet. Thanks. Njdon89 ( talk) 17:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Here is another source, RapGenius is a very reliable source and it is posted here as well, please do take consideration in this because it is not fair for a producer to not receive the credit he or she deserves when they have put their time and effort to it. Thanks. RapGenius: [19] [1] Njdon89 ( talk) 17:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please instruct me on how to dispute this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LordQuest ? I've spent weeks in the US landing placements with major artists for LordQuest he is verified by reliable sources according to Wiki standards why is there any question of deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Positivibes ( talk • contribs) 04:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
UGHH is always correct with producer credits it is a retail site that has the albums in advanced and it was correct with all the production credits that were already listed so how could they be wrong. Maybe Chad Hugo produced the song but just isn't credited in the booklet, where else would we ever find a source for these producers anyway until we do we should just keep the info. Koala15 ( talk) 17:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Is Discogs reliable enough for you? Cause they have the same credits listed right here. Koala15 ( talk) 17:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
We are never gonna get a correct source for the production credits, so what are we just gonna have to trust people that bought the album with adding the credits? I would rather just use the source. Koala15 ( talk) 18:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for this – I'd been humming and ha-ing about it for a little while, as those were singles all released when that was the primary format that Khalifa released his work in (similar to "Otherside" (Remix) by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis). However, I have one question: was " Hate Bein' Sober" actually a single? I can't find any digital download release, or radio release date, that suggests that it was. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 12:44, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
(It's just occurred to me how odd it is how we're both spending all this time debating over one tiny aspect of a moderately well-known song when there are far more important articles on more widely discussed encyclopedic topics that could use our care and attention. But I just don't have the motivation...) I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the article for PartyNextDoor, I didn't have time to finish it. I need to make an article for the self-titled mixtape as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs)
This should really warrant a much stronger warning. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 18:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I saw you edits and edit comments and I had all the facts I just wasn't sure how to word it properly so it would sound right and not copy the source info, but next time I will include all the facts. Casey.Grim85 ( talk) 21:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
If you are that much pinpoint then nowhere you'll find a professional reviewer stating "this is a stoner rock record" because that sounds very much inane and amateurish. And the latter review (of themusic.co.au) clearly states in the concluding passages that, "call it hard rock or sludge metal what you want.....". -- Shallowmead077 ( talk) 07:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
My source is simple by watching Monday Night Raw and visiting WWE.Com it states that Ricardo Rodriguez is Rob Van Dam's new manager so I placed Ricardo Rodriguez under the correct section on Van Dam's page maybe instead of changing my edit you could take the time yourself to see if what I did was correct since you seem on making the decision on what I edited was incorrect JMichael22 ( talk) 01:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Recently this article was nominated for deletion (as its indicated on the creators talk page). I added a reference to it, and I think its good to go now. If not, ping me and I will be happy to look for more references, although music is not my strength (at least not this type of genre).-- Mishae ( talk) 00:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
I left a detailed message at User_talk:Koala15#Album_notability demonstrating my point. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 23:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
there's absolutely no reason to have to cite the fact that Roscoe Dash in on the song "it's time"
listen to the song and you'll hear he's on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.23.68 ( talk) 23:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
How are you going to deny Roscoe Dash's vocals on the song, when they can be CLEARLY heard. Again I say, listen to the song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsaroce ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Big Sean's page says "Kanye West" why is that there? Please tell me that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrColonelCortez ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for editing my edit on Snoop Dog page.
Like I said BMI
[24] and my other websites lists his first name as Cordozar while others, like IMDb, list him as Broadus. Although IMDb
[25] also lists his grandparent as Cordozar Calvin Broadus Sr., making Snoop's first name Cordozar.
Your comment was «BMI lists last name then first name.»
Songwriter/Composer: BROADUS (last name) CORDOZAR (first name) CALVIN (middle name)
Current Affiliation: BMI
CAE/IPI #: 280557260
Tell me your thoughts. :)
Filipe Barros 17:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Darkfreakxx7 (
talk •
contribs)
yeah you're probably right, maybe "Having Sex" was just on one of his mixtapes... but the CDQ of "One Thousand" and "Having Sex" are out, so why'd you remove the official times? Distortiondude ( talk) 00:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
meet me at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Berzerk_.28song.29_brewing_edit_war.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
There is no reliable source that says "Survival" is on The Marshall Mathers LP 2. Neither Eminem or his label have confirmed that song to be on the album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bananasownapple ( talk • contribs) 21:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Static the reason why I've edited the label, instruments, and website information is because I've researched that information. His album booklet contains the name of the record company the album is under. Also, he produces his own music from time to time, which was also confirmed in his album booklets and he even spoke about producing his own music in interviews on YouTube. Lastly, that wasn't my Facebook information, that is his Facebook. He has his Instagram and Twitter linked to his Facebook profile. So, when he tweets from his verified profile on Twitter, it is posted on his Facebook wall. Also, an in an interview, he said that his Facebook name was, at the time, Rother Vandross, but it has changed since then. I'm friends with him on Facebook and I also follow him on Twitter. I am not a vandal, I'm just editing the page with current and legitimate information because he is one of my favorite artists. Thanks and have a blessed day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodneyP43 ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Pardon me? I have every right to change age, as SpaceGhostPurpp thanked me individually for it. I think you do not realize how serious I am about wikipedia, I wake up and I brush my teeth reading an article on the toothbrush, I get changed looking at an article on clothes.. You don't understand.. This website birthed me, and I'm doing everything in my right to keep it from vandals. The information is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Staplemaverick ( talk • contribs) 04:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
I believe you are mistaken. I did not add any content of any kind to the article, I actually deleted a statement that was not in accordance with Wikipedia's Assume good faith behavioral guidelines. I do understand the mistake however and forgive you for it. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Japalion9 ( talk • contribs) 05:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright i will do that though i don't think it really matters. Koala15 ( talk) 17:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you think there is no other significant Ryback. See my oppose comment on the noteworthiness of the historian. Dovid ( talk) 17:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
After no one that you said was on the CTE roster was on the CTE album...will you admit you were wrong? I'm gonna guess not, glad I know you are tho. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAMM.CO ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi STATicVerseatide. I'm sure you meant best when reverting my edit of the heading "Confirmed tracks" to "Recorded tracks", but I kept "Recorded tracks" because I don't want this to be another Detox (seeing how many "confirmed" tracks were later scrapped). And something about the word "confirmed" seems crystal ball-ish and unencyclopedic. Maybe we can use just "Tracks" perhaps? I know a release date is given and there're only a few months left, but things can change at the last minute. "Berzerk" and "Survival" are most likely going to make it to the album, but just to be sure... — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Please check the text at WP:ALBUMS/SOURCES#Sources to avoid paragraph 3. "Online retailers such as iTunes and Amazon.com should also be avoided. ... Track listings, release dates, record label, album covers and track lengths can all be found at Allmusic.— Iknow23 ( talk) 06:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Now, I see what you mean about Allmusic only listing CD here. They USED TO show Digital also. What happened? But if you really insist on WP:ALBUMS/SOURCES that's the one to use.— Iknow23 ( talk) 06:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I am removing these refs because they are spam. If you continue to replace them we will be in dispute. Jodosma ( talk) 20:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
That was a reliable source though (view tweet here: https://twitter.com/uugwuu/status/373525836105670658). He (Reggie Ugwu) works for Billboard and interviewed Drake for Billboard (see here: http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/the-juice/5679937/drakes-nothing-was-the-same-the-billboard-cover-story) and he also works for Complex Magazine (you could've figured these things out if he read his bio or google him). Drake and Best Buy have already confirmed there is a deluxe edition of NWTS but I guess they haven't confirmed which one of the two belongs to which, so you can keep that as 'alternate cover' for now, but you need to add those three songs to the confirmed tracks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowlerboy08 ( talk • contribs) 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
.This MRivera25 .i got your message i first started using wikipedia 2 years ago and i dont know alot about it. i made changes to Channel Orange and Earl because i'v been meaning to change it for awhile because i feel as if the artist's music sounds one way but label it as another i change it SORRY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRivera25 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.OK I'LL MAKE SURE I DO THE RESEARCH FIRST BEFORE I EDIT — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRivera25 ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC) . Look I apoligize for my meltdown, OK it wasnt anything personal alright it was just me not thinking first alright so im sorry deeply.and i will make sure that doesnt happen in the future alright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRivera25 ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
You serious, right? Cashis is not part of Shady Records anymore! Also, County Hound 2 is his second EP, not his second studio album, stupid! This needs to be changed back right now!! That was not cool!!! Skylar3214 4:59, 1 September 2013
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chinx Drugz. Since you had some involvement with the Chinx Drugz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). T C N7JM 01:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you got to the article as I was going to restore it to (actor). I think since the original move was from (actor) that probably is the default, but this may deserve a RM. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 23:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit I made -- are you saying that the IMDB.com is an unreliable source? Partyclams ( talk) 22:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Can you take a look at the articles that Billboarder22 has contributed/created? (You marked one of his/hers for speedy deletion.) They all have multiple issues - lots of smoke and mirrors. Several have already been deleted. I got so irritated reading them that I question my own neutrality. Thanks. RBDowing ( talk) 16:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey sorry to bother you but, please can you add a wiki page about pro era for example (Kirk Knight, CJ Fly or Nyck Caution, etc.) (9~6~13). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Og alchemizt ( talk • contribs) 00:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
What other way am I supposed to verify that I produced that beat if I wasn't credited? You have to understand that makes me really mad especially since this isn't a bias statement or a way of promotion. I'm actually telling the truth, if i went to court about this subject I would have all the right evidence to win the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistamidnight ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I had no control over the credits, Chief Keef didn't credit me and I've already spoken to him about it. He said he would tell Lil Reese to change it but nothing happened. It isn't my fault why I didn't get credited. Try seeing things from my point of view. I'm getting no recognition for my hard work and it's not easy to get your music to a major artist either. Just look at this tweet he made about me, I'm not lying for exposure https://twitter.com/ChiefKeef/status/289685606169202689 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistamidnight ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your greeting. Can I ask you a question? You are a WP:REVIEWER, but I have never seen infoboxes like one on the page ru:Очень страшное кино 5 (21 edits have not been reviewed yet) or ru:Caran d’Ache (this article has never been reviewed yet). Where can I see these infoboxes? Sergey Cepblu ( talk) 18:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I wrote translations in brackets.
You may read some information about flagged versions on Russian Wikipedia (in English). As I can see now, this proposal failed in English Wikipedia, also I found some articles (there were just 10 articles awaiting review—this is very few). Naya Rivera—the latest accepted version was accepted on 7 September 2013. There is 1 pending revision awaiting review. This is what I was looking for. Thanks. Sergey Cepblu ( talk) 13:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Can you point out for me where you see the No.59 for R&B chart in this source as you have indicated in this edit? When R&B chart peaks are selected on Billboard for Wale, there is no peak for "Poor Decision". What makes you assume that removing unverifiable peaks constitutes disruptive editing?-- Harout72 ( talk) 19:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Bubbling Under peaks can be included, but only in footnotes.
WP:Record charts is explicit that the songs are to be listed as uncharted with a footnote indicating the Bubbling Under position. Bubbling Under charts do not extend the main charts. They are related, certainly, but they are not an extension.—
Kww(
talk) 23:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Noticed you moved it to the bottom, is there a particular rule on this? I've noticed some pages have at the top and some at the bottom? KiraChinmoku ( T, ¤) 23:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
What if i just identify it as a song instead of a single? Can i just count it as a promo since it has a music video and a cover art? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drizzy010 ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Can't i just identify this song as a promo at least since it has a music video and a cover art? Drizzy010 ( talk) 19:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi mate. You want to discuss your changes here or on the talk page?-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 19:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok befor eI edit further I just want to clarify something(s): Does the discography for an artist have to include all of their works with others such as a group or collaboration album? Also the rules behind the discography have been changed so many times. Are these rules voted adn then put into effect? Who exactly decides them? And I'm assuming the ideal discography sections should emulate the ones on Too Short and 50 Cent's articles? Banan14kab ( talk) 06:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
In expressing opinion at Wikipedia:BOTREQ#TedderBot_replacement. If enough people comment there, maybe something will finally happen. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Here's a recognition for your long-time service at Wikipedia. Dealing with all those harmful edits over the years deserves a proper award. Keep up the good work. Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hi there - please discuss the expiration date from the DNAU template on Talk:Bradley Manning, before engaging in any further editing. That way we can all avoid an edit war. (: Thank you. CaseyPenk ( talk) 21:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I don't care what you say. I will always leave order of death sections.
You claim its unpublished? I sourced (with two sources), my last one I did. You didn't accept them. Further, you say there is a ban on original research? Then how does any film have a plot. I checked the plot section for dozens of movies, none of which have citations. Show me where there are cites or "non-original" research in any of the plots, and I will concede this point to you.
Lists are not banned by Wikipedia rules (they are discouraged, but it does say that they are appropriate in some cases and I can point you to hundreds of lists on Wikipedia).
The Order of Deaths goes directly to the plot, so it is not "trivia."
You are also not the king of Wikipedia, and I will continue to do this. It is useful, relevant and properly included. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
174.79.35.85 (
talk) 23:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I need you to restore the Beautiful Onyinye single. You don't have the right to delete it. You are praticing vandalism. versace1608 22:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
How does it? You need to specifically explain that to me rather than just gave me that. According to Wikipedia, "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." Here are several notable links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY2H2ZP56K4; http://www.okayafrica.com/2012/06/12/video-p-square-x-rick-ross-beautiful-onyinye/; http://www.bellanaija.com/2012/06/12/bn-video-premiere-p-square-feat-rick-ross-beautiful-onyinye-remix/
"1.Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts." African songs aren't popular like American and European songs and there's not a lot of information online. Also, there isn't a major music chart website like billboard. The closest thing to Billboard in Africa is Afribiz Top 100 chart, a weekly chart that compiles music from West, East, Central, and Southern Africa.
"2.Has won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award." Again, something that's not known worldwide can't possibly get nominated for the aforementioned awards, can it?
"3.Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups." Beautiful Onyinye has been released as a recording. The track is on iTunes. Here's the link: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/beautiful-onyinye-feat.-rick/id580462837?i=580462842
I've dissected Wikipedia's statements and don't see why "Beautiful Onyinye" doesn't qualify as a "notable song".
Wikipedia also states:"Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created."
According to the above statement, you don't have the right to delete the single because if it isn't "notable", the information should be "contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created."
Whatever angle you look at it from, you're wrong for deleting the "Beautiful Onyinye" article. I see that you've written numerous hip hop articles. How would you like it if I deleted your articles and tell you, " WP:NSONGS"? I'm pretty sure you wouldn't appreciate people who don't give 2 cents about your contribution to wikipedia. versace1608 23:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
P.S, there are numerous hip-hop, pop, country, and etc songs that haven't been nominated for any of the awards listed above. Yet, there are articles of them on Wikipedia. The last time I check, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia aimed at educating the word through information. If articles about P-Square (one of Africa's biggest musical duo) and other african musicians aren't created, how can people who are trying to learn about these artists know about them?
I am not threatening you. I only said you wouldn't appreciate it if someone else deleted your work. I can't delete your work and don't want to. I, unlike you, appreciate people's contributions to Wikipedia. "So you admit the song has not charted on any major music chart, and has not been nominated for any major awards?" There are numerous songs on Wikipedia that do not have chart singles and nominations. Why don't you delete them? Just because a song doesn't have charts information and nominations, doesn't mean it doesn't deserve to have an article. P-Square have other songs that have recieved accolades. Not every song an artist makes recieve nominations and awards. To say that an article needs to recieve accolades before its worthy to have a Wikipedia article is very bias my friend. If that was the case, all the tens of thousands of articles on Wikipedia should be deleted and you should delete them because you are the founder of Wikipedia and you made the rules. I am tired exchanging words with you. I am going to find an administrator who's not bias; moreover, someone who understand and can appreciate contributor's works.versace1608 00:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
As I have already told you this article is not eligible for CSD#A7 as there is a "credible claim of significance or importance" namely the collaboration with other notable musicians and the release of a number of albums. Giant Snowman 13:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Please look at the article and see how notable it is: I think WP:BEFORE should have applied here. Same with Salah Edin, which I'm asking to be restored--he's got three albums, at least one with TopNotch, and there's plenty of news coverage. I consider both of these nominations a bit hasty. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 14:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
"Not sure what that is but it would need a reliable source."
is a picture take from placebo fans worldwide forum alright? cause someone posted a picture which shows the songs on the live at rak studios dvd. by the way, it from the digipak version and box set of loud like love. violetcries ( talk) 21:33, 14 September 2013
Hi there,
I received a notification from you on the article that I posted about Songsbury. I am not quite understanding the reason for possible deletion as the article is unbiased and has valid references to support the items within the article. If you have detected any bias, would you be able to pinpoint the exact place as to where it is in the article and I'd be more than happy to rephrase it.
Thanks for your help
-- Songsbury ( talk) 21:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
The article is not an autobiography and I do not represent the artist I'm writing about. I'm a fan of the artist and the band that he is in. I'm a little unsure about how the subject may not be deemed notable as I have provided the proper references. How does it work with the administrators? How long does it take for them to make a decision on the article? I'm new to wikipedia as a contributor and I have other articles and contributions to articles I'd like to make, so I'm trying to better understand how the system and format goes.
Thanks again
-- Songsbury ( talk) 21:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm realizing that now...but it's a little too late to change. Although the articles were overall about the band, the artist was the one being interviewed and the journalist had asked questions about the artists music history and accomplishments. I thought that would've been an adequate reference to the details I posted. I will see what other reputable references I can find about the artist.
Thanks for your time and insight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Songsbury ( talk • contribs) 22:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Perfect. I will do more digging and will request a name change as well. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Songsbury ( talk • contribs) 22:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I have responded to your comment on my my talkpage. Regards, Woody ( talk) 22:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
"Gudda Gudda (rapper)" is an unnecessarily long title per WP:PRECISION. Why don't you ask User:Courcelles to unsalt the original page so we can move it there? 2Flows ( talk) 08:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
It's from the actual physical copy that i have smh — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonXXYoung ( talk • contribs) 15:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
hi, on 2chainz ft Fergie 'netflix' i am credited in the booklet as additional production and programming under DJA, as well as my writing credit under my real name Derek Allen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blkmsk ( talk • contribs) 08:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I used "Edit Beta" which probably messed up the source and I didn't realise that as I didn't even compare the changes. Re-edited it now by editing the source. Being a member of wikipedia for only the last 10 minutes, your message is clearly not what I was expecting :( Not the best way to welcome people, but hey...thats you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gulliverrr ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey! Sure, I can make the Welcome To Forever discography page. I wasn't sure if I should since his other mixtapes don't have pages. I'll start it tomorrow & have it up as soon as possible. Thank you. NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 22:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
why is chris brown associated with lil wayne — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrColonelCortez ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I was wondering what happened to the wiki page for "Runway Star", after the changes were made her page redirects to "The Makerz" page which is currently under proposed deletion.
How can I get Runway Star's wiki back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefuture2027 ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
heres the source i used for the drake producers... can you please restore them since you deleted it http://www18.zippyshare.com/v/41093650/file.html
You may want to read User talk:Davidwr#Runway Star (Conflict of Interest). davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 17:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Could you please review the articles that I wrote for Fly Union and TGTC (The Greater Than Club) (Album). Feedback would be greatly appreciated as these are the first two articles that I have ever written on Wikipedia. Malcolmrevere ( talk) 04:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you in a bit more personal way! For all your help, it's very appreciated :) NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 01:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Okay I know I didn't put any reliable sources to show the vocals are there, but I have ears, and the least you could do was post a source instead of removing the *true* edit I made. Distortiondude ( talk) 13:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
EDIT: The NWTS page now has the Birdman outro (not posted by myself) on it without a source, but it hasn't been taken down... hmmm? Distortiondude ( talk) 13:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=AP.9_(rapper) - i add 2 references that i can find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GENR12 ( talk • contribs) 06:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Since you're gonna be ignorant and direct me to "promotional singles" definition on here, go look at "buzz single/advance single" off the same page. That's what those other songs are so stop ruining album info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoka1234 ( talk • contribs) 07:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
It seems that the IP guy was right. From CNBC:
The code will make available for purchase at the special price of $8.99 an edition of The Marshall Mathers LP 2 featuring not only the track “Survival,” but also a bonus, exclusive studio track.
I'm not trying go berzerk on you or anything, as I'm aware original reports were stating that "Survival" was the only bonus track. Zach Vega ( talk to me) 22:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
It was not a good faith edit but there is no source currently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guidorulz ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't treat me like a first time editor. Thank you. As for the article, the source is there now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guidorulz ( talk • contribs) 02:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
I think you have misinterpreted the issues of edit warring. 1-no one has claimed I am wrong to state that Jay-Z is African-American, they have just stated that I am putting the notice of such in the wrong place. Each time I have placed it in a different place. I have placed it in a different way. So This is an overly broad interpretation of edit warring. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Alrighty, so if I can find sources I can add them to the page? Does it have to be multiple sources, or just one showing him doing the move?
Rebel Pattern ( talk) 07:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Per MOS:CO, "should not conceal article content" does not exclude track listings, and the track listings do not "consolidate information covered in the main text", as the names of all the tracks are not covered in the main text. With a name like Wikimedia Foundation, I feel we must respect people who use text only web browsers. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 18:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear user: You left a rather harsh message on my talk page stating that I made "unconstructive edits" to Escape Plan. I hate to inform you that you have been misinformed as I made no such edits. This being Friday night and all, I'm assuming that you are in a bad mood after a hard week's work and am ignoring your insolence. However, I will leave you with this suggestion, that before you post messages on other user's talk pages, you take a deep breath and count to ten before writing you message. This way, all Wikipedia will benefit.
Thank you and good night. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6002:6:5489:3696:24D7:3041 ( talk) 01:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
I see you are going to changing your username. Just curious... ///EuroCar GT 20:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Its is always referred to World Wrestling Entertainment while WWE is only a trade name We should rename the title to World Wrestling Entertainment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma Hrishi ( talk • contribs) 04:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for telling me about my mistakes. Can you tell me why there is no move button in WWE article. I am a autoconfirmed user(4 days,10 edits) Also can you tell me how can i start a requested move thanks in advance... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma Hrishi ( talk • contribs) 10:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for creating incorrect redirects. I did not realize I was viewing an unreliable source before, which is quite embarrassing. I hope the additional redirects I created are valid and adhere to the manual of style. If you are able, please feel free to assist with the deletion of the incorrect redirects I created before. Thank you. (Next time I will be more careful!) -- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey man I understand, If you dont like T.I., ok, he is well-known as the king of da south, everybody in the hip hop industry now that T.I. has been compared with tupac , of course wikipedia is angry with T.i. since get back up (song). t.i. said in many interviews that he has multi-platinum albums, trap muzik and king in july 2010 was 2x platinum, paper trail has been 3x platinum as july 2012. no mercy sold over one million in the US as december 2012. of course chris brown x album is irrelevant for u , but you have to think in the Fans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.12 ( talk) 22:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
So it appears he's not sticking with the 3Krazy moniker, as he has released "F.D.B." and "Notorious", two songs from his upcoming mixtape, under the name Young Dro. You mind changing it back?
Yeah we made a change for the new producer we have if you can put it back up plz thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jperez92 ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
HHH Pedrigree has also been apart on the edit war. I keep editing the page because he keeps trying to redirect the page because he does believe its noticeable enough which it is since they are appearing at the companys big event of the year where only the important people appear. So could you please that the ban off? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ8946 ( talk • contribs) 21:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Uh yeah i was just uploading higher quality versions, and i will upload the Hotel California deluxe in a sec. Koala15 ( talk) 23:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Oh wait should we just change the artwork to the one with just the tiger, i'm confused because different websites are still using both. Koala15 ( talk) 23:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
The file could be glitched, i already uploaded the one with tiger so will use that. Koala15 ( talk) 23:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I figured out how to see what you had changed.
FWIW, both ASCAP and the Harry Fox Agency (which are official licensing sources) show that there were either 3 or 4 writers on STARTED FROM THE BOTTOM. I did not post a specific resource due to the fact that, unfortunately, the two sources don't agree and both of the sources require a click through approval, so I was not able to provide a direct link to the information. That said, please feel free to take a look at what ASCAP and Harry Fox have listed, and decide what you think is best. You will see that there is no question about Noah "40" Shebib being one of the writers.
https://www.ascap.com/Home/ace-title-search/index.aspx
http://www.harryfox.com/songfile/public/publicsearchresults.do?forward=drilldown&index=0
Mohansen11 ( talk) 00:37, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
HipHopDx said Mike Zombie was the sole producer; http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/singles/id.23605/title.Drake-Started+From+The+Bottom
Rolling Stone said Noah "40" Shebib was the sole producer; and http://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/drake-works-his-way-up-in-started-from-the-bottom-20130211
Rap Up says they both produced it: http://www.rap-up.com/2013/01/31/drake-set-to-release-new-single-on-grammy-night/
Mohansen11 ( talk) 01:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
I get what your saying, but wikipedia is having a major lag when you overwrite a file it just doesn't update so instead of wasting my time i just upload a reduced version on a new file, i don't see the big deal. Koala15 ( talk) 17:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Yep when you overwrite an existing file it just doesn't update, it's been happening everywhere. Koala15 ( talk) 20:35, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your time.
The picture is one that Travis personally asked me to upload to his Wikipedia page.
How do i upload this without any trouble? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Millyman77 ( talk • contribs) 03:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Yeah that looks good i will use that from now on, though some albums only get like 2 weeks on the charts so the "since" thing makes sense there. Koala15 ( talk) 22:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
yea just because a record is publicized produced by a producer doesn't make it true. blogs make mistakes. album credits will reveal this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 22:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
a blog site does not count as a reliable source . whats an email i can reach you at ? the record was improperly publicized and another producer is taking credit that is undeserved . its honestly not that serious . but i would like to understand what levels do we need to take this to ? management or legal team ? do i need RCA to contact you and show you proof of what i'm saying ? do i need to send you split sheets for the song ? Chris is not mentioning Arthur in any interviews . and the interview that you provided to site that it is going to be a bonus track on iTunes does not mention Arthur anywhere in it . there are only 2 creative individuals on that song . Glass John and Chris Brown . no other producers or writers . so tell me what you need and we can take care of it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 06:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
i just read what i wrote i do not a see what part of that paragraph you could possibly consider a threat . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 22:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
never said his legal team. i was asking if you need to see legal documentation. or to be contacted by management. relax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.43.52 ( talk) 06:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Also have you yet gave any type of URL source backing your edits? No you have not. STATic message me! 14:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Why would you remove the deluxe edition cover from Finally Rich? It is not similar at all, i can see when its the same cover just a different color but this ones totally different. I think you might taking the wikipedia handbooks out of context. Koala15 ( talk) 02:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I really don't think they look similar, and what you are saying is just based off of your opinion. If you really care that much start a conversation on the Finally Rich talk page about it and see if other people agree with you. Koala15 ( talk) 02:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering if you knew anything about Logic's mixtape pages being redirected to his main wiki page? Thanks! NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 16:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Alright, thanks once again! NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 21:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Yeah i get it now. Koala15 ( talk) 18:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello i have been making changes to the OVO page. Thanks for making it! I just wanted to update 2 pictures but dont know how. Can I send the pictures to you by email? The pictures are the OVO Owl logo and the OVO Fest logo! thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tovonxo ( talk • contribs) 00:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Okay kool also ad the ( OVO fest logo ) picture as well with the OVO fest part! if you have time thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tovonxo ( talk • contribs) 00:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Check this out, I made changed to Enough Said by Aaliyah & Drake because the companies (Blackground & OVO) are under Warner Bros. and Interscope — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
And it says on the Aaliyah Enough Said artwork cover it has the Blackground & OVO logo which both have distributing companies over them.
I made that OVO page if that was alright with you. I just don't wanna get blocked you know?
Chris Brown says he will turn 24 when the album comes out, suggesting that's when it's going to be released.-- Laun chba ller 14:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
So what's the deal with all of the edits? I'm not picking and choosing to change a few select articles. Other articles had that format for discographies and I was just also copying it. I cannot go to every single artist and do it. There are too many. That's why I was doing them one at a time more or less. So stop changing the edits. I'll limit it to the main studio albums, but do not change the format. Everytime I edit on a musical artist's article I run into you. Why is that? Banan14kab ( talk) 21:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey! This album stream is authorized by the distributing label, Nature Sounds. DJBooth.net is a content publisher, who works directly with record labels to provide their platform for authorized streaming. BZisook ( talk) 17:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Brian Zisook, 4/23/2013.
I'm sorry, but how could you say that an album being released for stream is not notable? In today's music industry, with a newfound importance placed on streaming music, the availability of an album in stream form is both newsworthy AND notable. News articles were written about Justin Timberlake's decision to stream his new album, several weeks before its release, through iTunes. Does this rule only apply to lesser known, not-as-popular artists? BZisook —Preceding undated comment added 21:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Nowhere did I write this was a "rare occurrence." In fact, it is becoming more popular. And yes, there are plenty of reliable sources, for example Rolling Stone or NPR, who also host newsworthy and notable album streams upon release. Here is a link to an article on Rolling Stone. And DJBooth.net IS a reliable source. It is a leading publisher of original music content, part of the Complex Media Network. ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Sir, you asked to see an example of another outlet reporting on the streaming of an album, which I provided for you. In the case of Float, here is a news mention on HipHopDX.com. It is very clear that the issue at hand here is in regard to what makes a publisher of original content a "reliable source". DJBooth.net is not a blog, like the others you listed, but even so to write that a blog cannot be a reliable or proper news source is uninformed and inaccurate. AllHipHop.com is a website in the same media network, similar to DJBooth in that it curates newsworthy, proper and original content. After doing some digging, it states on the [ Links] page, under "Links normally to be avoided," that outbound links about newsworthy topics are allowed, so long as the source is a [ Authority]. DJBooth.net is indeed a recognized authority in urban music. BZisook ( talk) 05:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi StatIc,
You keep deleting the Order of Deaths section for Evil Dead - 2013 Film. For the record, I emailed Wikipedia and ROn Jones confirmed that it does not violate any terms or standards. I have also successfully posted this section on other horror film web pages.
The fact is, the manner and order of kills is a central theme of horror film. People want to know how/why/when people were dispatched. I absolutely intend to keep re-posting this section, it is both central to the plot and provides something that the horror fans want to know. If this doesn't fit, why bother explaining deaths in the long-form plot, or providsing details on Easter Eggs or sub-plots?
Further, you noted that the section is "not sourced." I looked and none of the statements in the plot are sourced... simply because the plot section is created by people who have seen the film and are describing the plot. Though I would be happy to provide the source (the film itself), I do not know what the appropriate method would be. Would be happy to include any "source" you deem worthy. 174.79.35.85 ( talk) 18:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC). Evan
The referenced email:
Wikipedia information team <info-en@wikimedia.org> Apr 13 (13 days ago)
Dear Evan B,
Thank you for your email. Our response follows your message.
04/12/2013 20:08 - Evan B wrote:
> Hi,
> > I am a big fan of horror films. Often, many fans of the genre want to know > how a person in a horror film is dispatched. I have been editing several > pages (most recently - Evil Dead 2013 film) and providing an Order of > Deaths section in the plot to reveal such info. I have noticed that this is > being removed from each page. > > I was curious why? It is part of the plot and I am not using any vulgar > words or phrases to describe what happens? Can someone please explain? > > - Evan
I can't say - you would have to check the history page and see who removed it. It does not violate our policies. However do remember that all data needs to be referenced - if you add large sections and no reference - then it's more than likely that someone will take it out.
Yours sincerely,
Ron Jones
Again, this is not trivia, it is plot. It has been posted on other pages (although, I fear if I direct you to those pages, you will simply delete). Again, I am willing to work with you on formatting and/or citation. Otherwise, we appear to be at a logjam.
You - to my knowledge, are the only person to remove this section. Again, I have yet to read one Wiki page where PLOT has been cited (simply put, it can't be cited as PLOT comes from the viewer reading the material).
I have read this and do not agree that it is trivia. It is substantive referencing both character and plot.
Again, this is substantive information bearing directly on plot. It is as "reliable" as whoever posted the plot itself - or do you think that should be deleted as well since it contains no citation?
I never said my change is "supported," what I said was that the Wiki editors stated it did not violate their policies. The email reflects that directly. Although iut did note that large information sections need to be cited, you have yet to direct me to any plot of a movie that has a citation, nor have you demanded what sort of citation you want. You tell me what citation, and I will make the changes accordingly.
Otherwise, it seems there is no dealing with you. I will continue to post this, and you will continue to delete it. Good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.79.35.85 ( talk) 23:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
So now what. We have two for the change (me and one person on the Talk page) and two against (you and one other person on the talk page). Are we just going to have to engage in an edit war? I did everything you requested and an impasse still seems to exist.
I do not want it to be a war. I do want to include this information. Because you seem to lack basic reading comprehension here is the person's comment:
Sheesh everyone, there's no need to be so harsh. Although trivia is actively discouraged on Wikipedia, this does prove to be some useful information regarding the plot, albeit with major spoilers added in for those who didn't see the movie. In other words, a simple "no" would've sufficed. —stay (sic)! 11:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
This person neither thought it was trivia, nor were they opposed. In fact, this person stated it was useful info. regarding the plot. The "no" was in regards to your tone in your response. It is you who is abrasive and seems to want to wage an edit war. If I wanted a war, I wouldn't have posted to talk, added citations or bothered talking with you. Again, you are the only person to have deleted this section. Clearly, you refuse to be reasoned with despite the fact that I have bent over backwards to work with you. 174.79.35.85 ( talk) 21:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi you wouldn't have happened to delete some of the edits I made did you? Also I appreciate you taking some of the edits and simply creating a new section, I didn't want some of the information to run together.01:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC) Destiny57 ( talk)
Hi, let's talk about the refs here: Talk:808_Mafia 2Flows ( talk) 23:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
You can see his face, but it isn't a very good shot. It's pretty low quality and you can't really see his face that we'll TBH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DA Fernandez ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted my edit at Twelve Reasons to Die saying that "The Brown Tape" cover would be released to stores. If we add that one then why don't we add the instrumental version, that ones being released to stores also, or the cassette version. I just think this is kind of odd since most editors won't even allow us to add deluxe edition covers even if they are completely different. Koala15 ( talk) 14:25, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Apparently you think I don't know what I was doing when I removed those entries at the Cashis articles. I removed them as unsourced. I mentioned the non-notable or mixtape part because they didn't have articles of their own where the source would be found. OTOH, apppearences on notable things, which had articles, have sources and didn't need repeated here. Niteshift36 ( talk) 16:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
As you said, it would be better to wait for a while. The album was released less than a month ago, so information will appear the next months. You can use Man on the Moon: The End of Day (if it still meeting the GA criteria), or any of the GA you have contributed. It is important the aricle does not include unsourced statements (expecting for plots--if it has--per WP:FILMPLOT) or original research or unsourced "facts". The references shouldn't have bare links, and they should have all possible information: title, author, who made the work (journal, magazine, tv program, etc.) who published the work (generally a company or subsidiary), date, and accessdate. Also, I recommend you to archive urls with WebCite or any other archive site. Some links tend to become dead in a few years, but not most of them. Look at GBooks (in a few years) as offline sources usually write about this, or even search for information offline when it appears. If you believe you don't write very well, contact a WP:GOCE member or trusted-to-you editor who have written FAs/GAs to make a copy-edit of it. Also, you can try to WP:PR it before the GA moment to have comments about it and make easier the GA nomination. Those are tips I can give you for a general GA nomination. Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about the reverts, didn't realize there were comments on the talk page. I've replied to you there, could you check it out there? Andrzejbanas ( talk) 02:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Dude, for the song Crack by 2 Chainz has TM88 & Southside as producers on the 808 Mafia 2 mixtape and said that him and Lex Luger were both working on Flockaveli 2 via instagram.
Brandon TNT West is the producer of Ready Set Go along with Darnell Saadiq Bolden. If you read the actual credits of the album you will see his credit. His publishing information is Truth Knowledge Truth and this and his song credits can be verified by ASCAP. Please see below: READY SET GO FT. MELANIE FIONA (TK. GREENE, S. BOLDEN, B. WEST, M. HALLIM) PENSKILLS MUSIC (BMI)/SONGS OF WINDSWEPT PACIFIC (BMI), ALL RIGHTS ADMINISTERED BY BMG RIGHTS MANAGEMENT (US) LLC, TRUTH KNOWLEDGE TRUTH (ASCAP), THE LAST MUSICIAN CO (BMI), RONDOR MUSIC PUBLISHING FOR ITSELF AND MIXED CHICK PUBLISHING / MEROKEE MUSIC (SOCAN) / (ASCAP) / TITLE NINE MUSIC (ASCAP) PRODUCED BY SAADIQ BOLDEN FOR CHERRY ANN MUSIC AND BRANDON ‘TNT’ WEST FOR FRANK’S GRANDSONS MUSIC INC. TALIB KWELI VOCALS RECORDED BY ALBY COHEN/ENGINEER AND CHRIS PUMMILL/ASSISTANT ENGINEER AT ROUGH MAGIC STUDIOS, BROOKLYN, NY MIXED BY JASON SCHWEITZER AT MADLANDS STUDIO, LOS ANGELES, CA MASTERED BY DAVE KUTCH/THE MASTERING PALACE, NYC MELANIE FIONA APPEARS COURTESY OF TITLE 9 / SRC / UNIVERSAL REPUBLIC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnt718 ( talk • contribs) 04:39, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Nobody is being a 'disruptive editor'...seriously. You guys can keep the funny threats to yourselves. Obviously certain people who write these pages go off of what they see online. You should always verify any artist, producer, writer and/ or publishers work and credit properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnt718 ( talk • contribs) 04:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
You guys have eyes and you can read the credits yourself. Buy the album. So we'll keep changing it until you see it for yourself. No need to be difficult just read for yourself and make sure your sources credit properly. ( Tnt718 ( talk) 05:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC))
Seriously don't you or henchmen send ideal threats. We put factual information online that can be found if YOU follow your journalistic responsibility and get info from real sources not something you read online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnt718 ( talk • contribs) 07:07, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
http://instagram.com/p/WBJ7VchUo_/ On this tracklist, the picture obviously says Blocka at the top.
Also, not to sound bitter or rude but typing out that Owl Pharaoh article took a lot of work and hours out of me so I didn't really appreciate you chopping it down so severely.
Why was Same Shit & Seperated removed from singles? They dropped in 2012 and were originally going to be the first singles on his 13 Album
They're most definitely on iTunes here [3] [4]
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
98.118.173.200 (
talk) 03:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Static, the sentence you have re-added at the end of the Background section almost exactly matches the last sentence of the article's overview (first paragraph). They're essentially the same thing. Listing guest artist appearances would likely be better suited in the overview section IMO as their mention in the album's Background does not add anything. Perhaps if there was additional information about the how Kweli chose artists for this album, it may provide insight warranting mention in a Background section. What do you think? Charger2 ( talk) 20:56, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I can put what I want on here I make my own wwe personnel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yorkerman ( talk • contribs) 22:48, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Dough Pildin is the new single released on May, 13th from his Albert Einstein album he released on soundcloud. He stated in interviews that he didn't have beef with the west coast just Pac, Snoop and Dogg Pound. He had feuds with Jay-Z and Nas in 2001. Lakey the kid in 1999, Tru Life in 2000, Littles in late 2004, Max B in 2008 and Havoc and his cousin Ferg in 2012, if anyone wants to add this stuff to his page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.236.36.116 ( talk) 17:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 19:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Okay buddy i'm not trying to "take your credit" or anything like that i just thought that the article had potential to be a GA. I don't think you really have to have created the whole article to nominate it for GA. When someone nominates an article for GA the reviewer gives suggestions to help bring the article to GA status. So i would have to majorly fix the article anyway, but if it really bothers you that much i'll withdraw it. Koala15 ( talk) 04:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
I would like to see where it says you have to be "top contributor" to bring an article to GA status. I recently brought an article to GA status when i was not the top contributor but i made tons of changes necessary to bring the article to GA status. Koala15 ( talk) 04:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings, STATic. Thank you for your recent contributions to the discussion and !voting at the VA/E talk page. The wider participation of knowledgeable, well-read, and literate editors is important to the success of the VA/E list's prioritization and updating. I hope you will continue to participate. Your contributions are welcome and appreciated. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 19:33, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Kris Stephens is signed to GrandHustle records as T.I. stated on his recent visit to 106andPark, can you please put it back because when I added it I messed up the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 02:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
For future reference album covers should be 300 x 300 not 200 x 200. Koala15 ( talk) 18:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Well 200 x 200 looks too small in a infobox and if you tag an image to be reduced a bot reduces it at the end of the day. Koala15 ( talk) 20:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
-- User:STATicVerseatide I am a fan of 50 Cent, i have every different versions of his albums. i keep correcting what is wrong, and it always get deleted by Dan56 and now you!!!!! What can i do then? I'm just helping peaple to see truth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lil' Click Kla ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
When did it become the norm to go straight to AfD with a redirect, without bothering to have any sort of discussion at all? AfD should be the last resort. It's a viable search term, so deleting it is not the preferred course of action. Niteshift36 ( talk) 21:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
the song was produced by science. j cole said it on the song. I can't cite it from any other source but a lyrics site Wayn12 ( talk) 01:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
I recently saw you've removed my edit twice on this page. It states at the end of the video it was directed by Colin Tilley and Drake. I know I didn't quote a source which is likely why you've removed the edit, but it is right there in the credits at the end of the video. A few music sites have also picked up on this too. No worries though, I know it was in good faith.
Peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellow Lilt ( talk • contribs) 22:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I removed that section because those songs were clearly not released as singles but if you wanna keep false info, we can. Koala15 ( talk) 02:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Yeah i added just the ones released to itunes. Koala15 ( talk) 02:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
"So what? See the link. If the article is nothing except an infobox and tracklist it is not worth having an article." Nearly every album article on Wikipedia is a tracklist and infobox so that statement is inaccurate. When you redirect mixtapes that is ok but when your redirecting an album and strongly believe it should not exist you should probably do an afd for a second opinion. Koala15 ( talk) 14:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Thank you for the help of the hip hop Wikipedia community! Thanks for the amazing articles! Keep it up! 11Block | talk 03:39, 15 June 2013 (UTC) |
Well thank you for including the uncredited vocals section on the album. I did notice that the back of the album doesn't include many of the features, so you were right in removing them from the official tracklist, unless the booklet (if there is one) says they're on it. I just wanted to make sure that the features were included somewhere, so thank you again! Distortiondude ( talk) 18:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
No I'm not crazy, please be more mature when responding to another editor. The statement "many full length free mixtapes" is not true, he released one mixtape which was a compilation of songs that were already released plus an additional 10 new songs, and his only other free mixtape is High Tide which was not "full length" because it is only 5 songs. These are the only songs that are by the artist Harry Fraud, the other mixtapes and songs he is in he is simply credited as a producer. SO this brings us to the Daft Punk remix, which is the first SINGLE that Fraud has released for free over the internet, also one of his first notable songs with the incarcerated Max B. So if you do not respond with the Wikipedia rules which declare that this piece of information is not notable it will be added again to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikopowii ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
What I added to this page was the truth as there are reliable sources on the net but I don't know how to post links on wiki. ink is: http://www.mtvhive.com/2013/06/10/scoop-deville-britney-spears-travis-barker-eminem/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.203.121.232 ( talk) 12:03, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, STATicVerseatide, you will like this list. 12.168.46.153 ( talk) 16:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I agree that Billboard sometimes use the sales figures for both versions of the song for one charting, they did it with " I'm a Flirt", however, I'm pretty sure Billboard will always denotes the featured artists, and on the charts, "Work" credits Ferg as being the sole artist, not like when the remix of Meek Mill's single "Ima Boss" charted, which listed all the featured guests [5] And I've actually only heard the original play on the radio, but then again I don't listen to too much radio.--User: 1Sire talk 03:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Not intending this to be patronizingly simple, just informative. Complete sentences. The subjects, objects and verbs in WWE 2K14 are fine. It was only the irrelevance I chopped. The article's not about the gaming media or when they get press releases about things and "confirm" them. It's about the game with The Rock on the cover, and Jim Ross voice-acting. You know? InedibleHulk (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Well it is clear it definitely needs expanding, but that does not mean would should trim it down to the bare minimum. This is definitely not puffing up the article as it is just a longer sentence, not a whole damn paragraph. There is no reason to not include the information, and instead include a fragmented sentence. You are definitely turning it to a mountain accusing me of being pointy when im just improving the article. It not that WWE13 needs work, its that this is proper notable information that should be included. I would not be surprised if 85% of sports video game articles have some information on the cover athlete being chosen. STATic message me! 06:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
As you saw, I put in the notes how there are 3 main masters of Yeezus: the physical, the US digital, and world digital. Yes, I did cite a forum, but it seems important enough to put as a note that there are differences in the different versions of the album, and I have no other source but my own ears and the forum. Any suggestions on how to include it? Distortiondude ( talk) 01:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
may i say y did you edit Mike Posner infobox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XmaxX1212 ( talk • contribs) 07:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure why you think it necessary to include details such as the medium by which an album released is announced. Since the album in question has actually been released all that is needed to be included is that it came out, and perhaps when. Announcements in the run-up (unless they are particularly notable) are not really relevant Otherwise, it reads as "person said a record is going to come out and then that record came out". Ilikeeatingwaffles ( talk) 10:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey just an FYI. I saw your edits on the deadmau5 page. There is currently a discussion regarding his name on the talk page. We have requested a move of the article's title. Feel free to join. MidnightRequestLine ( talk) 15:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
So, you actually think "EW is a way more prestigious reviewer" than COS, fine. But, Fact magazine is more prestigious as being a music magazine than EW and Pitchfork could ever be, so I will be replacing either Pitchfork or EW with Fact. By the way, NY Daily News is more reliable than say The Fly, which is another music magazine. See, I trust music magazines first and foremost, which EW is just anoter generic entertaiment magazine. To me, it goes music magazines (i.e. Fact, The Fly, Rolling Stone), music webzines (i.e. Allmusic, Consequence of Sound, Slant Magazine), newspapers (i.e. The A.V. Club, The Guardian, USA Today), and then entertainment publications (i.e. Entertainment Weekly). We are in fact talking about music, so music-based publications are more reliable and prestigious than just a mere entertainment ones. Sorry, but I judge things to a way, way, way different standard.15:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
T.I. said on 106&Park that they are signed to the label, and said Iggy was still signed to the label months after that was added to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
T.I. said it in a interview that Hustle Gang and Grand Hustle are the same thing check online he said it's just another way to refer to the label like YMCMB to YonngMoney and Cash Money.Look below T.I.'s new videos on Vevo like MemoriesBackThen,With Me, and Doe B's Let Me Find Out Remix, it says HustleGangMusic as the label it's the same as GrandHustleRecords.
Here's a link http://rollingout.com/music/artist-interviews/grand-hustles-newest-artist-kris-stephens-talks-new-single/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 02:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC) And Rich Gang is different as they include non-labelmates T.I. said HustleGangMusic is just a different way to refer to GrandHustle.
Yikes. After I added the NXT championships to the template of WWE Championships, I now see that a whole new template has been created for the NXT championships that also lists the defunct FCW championships. As such do you think we should undo the addition of the NXT championships to the WWE template? Starship.paint ( talk) 05:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I do not understand why Kanye West could not be signed with the label as he has founded the label. Jay-Z has founded Roc Nation and he releases his own albums on Roc Nation. Lil Wayne founded Young Money Entertainment and he releases his own albums on Young Money Entertainment. Thank you for reading this message and please respond! :) 11Block | talk 00:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello.
I know the name of one of J. Cole's original sample that he used for a track off of his new Born Sinner album, but you have deleted my contribution from the page.
What can we do so that this dosen't happen again? You can't say that we need sources, as the other sample names have no links attached to them.
Thanks.
I'm well-aware of the three-revert rule – I understand that I've undone the edit three times, and I have no wish to start an edit war, so from here on I'll cease to do so. If I've annoyed you regarding this, then I apologize. I hope to get this resolved as conflict-free as possible and hope that we can work together constructively in the future. A talk page discussion to determine consensus regarding this issue is the best way to handle this. Cheers, Holiday56 ( talk) 16:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Jimbo Wales Happiness Award |
Doesn't his smile melt your heart? Glossenglocke ( talk) 20:45, 01 October 1953 (UTC) |
I found the "confirmed tracks" for Drake's 3 rd album on Facebook and looks real official.
Has it ever occurred to you that Ralph Folarin sounds a lot like Ralph Lauren? Its a nickname that has taken on a life of its own. Like the article also says, he was born with the first name, Olubowale, or Wale for short. So, "Wale" is not a fake name, as you asserted. I very clearly remember back in 2008 when Wale started using the name Ralph Folarin as a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ropo153 ( talk • contribs) 01:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, seeking advice: On this page : http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Lloyd_Banks&diff=next&oldid=561695259
I left this pointless statement alone, can we just delete those sort of things, rather than having to put it into an archive I guess? Just the documentation scope doesnt sometimes scale down to really quite pages. Or maybe I just getting it wrong.
Reply here is fine thanks.
Thanks for your time.
Jcislowski ( talk) 20:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Although Black Flag isn't officially an album it is still the next piece of work in Machine Gun Kelly's release history, and thus it should still be noted on the "Lace Up" page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaPhenom ( talk • contribs) 00:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I recently created the article titled Black Flag (Mixtape). It may or may not be under review (i'm unsure), can that be put onto the page for Lace Up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaPhenom ( talk • contribs) 00:40, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Three sentences came from the MGK page. It's a new mixtape/free album (it depends on who you ask) and it should be allowed to exist as it's own page, just look at Comeback Season by Drake. It has no reviews, and very little information other than the track listing, how does that make this mixtape significant? ThaPhenom ( talk) 01:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
The artist himself as well as Diddy refer to the mixtape as an album, but I already knew Wikipedia wouldn't (that's why I said "free album/mixtape, it depends on who you ask"). I'm simply trying to create a page for this mixtape and add reviews as time passes on. Sadly, the first attempt was redirected into Machine Gun Kelly before I could further edit it. Here's my most recent edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ThaPhenom/sandbox Please let me know what you think, and I would much appreciate anything you'd have to offer regarding how to edit/fix the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThaPhenom ( talk • contribs) 02:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks man. I'll be sure to look out for that stuff when it's released. ThaPhenom ( talk) 03:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you care to comment at this discussion over whether the phrase "rave reviews" should be removed from the Yeezus article? It's much ado about nothing, but stubbornness persists. Dan56 ( talk) 14:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, sorry I messed up the MGK info box. I'm alright with the template being deleted but can you add some of the stuff I added to it; regarding the mixtape section and the addition of "Alone" by Sleeping With Sirens to the Featured Singles section? ThaPhenom ( talk) 06:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
I prefer the song from Black Flag as well, it seems less forced than "Alone" did. Sorry for being such a hassle the last few days, I'm kinda new to making edits on Wikipedia. "Alone" doesn't have it's own page yet, that's why I linked Feel instead, and the mixtapes were just put on so more people would be aware of them, Rage Pack isn't even mentioned on the page. Thanks for not being rude about all this. ThaPhenom ( talk) 06:45, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Only reason you won't find Gigwise on Metacritic or ADM is because they don't give any scores in their reviews; it'd be impossible for a review aggregator to use them. 2.127.89.190 ( talk) 02:13, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Well now it is protected again (thank God) so oh well. STATic message me! 14:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
You are completely justified in your changes, but I don't see how 'Yeezus' can be classed as Hip Hop.... it's Glitch-hop at best... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.6.204 ( talk) 10:01, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Not really original research, if it was really releasing in 2 weeks then wheres the pre orders, track list or cover? The date was announced in April and i think its safe to say its not happening. Koala15 ( talk) 15:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Sorry STATic, I'm a new Wikipedia user and I was just playing around. I did that because I did not think anybody would go on Kik Messenger. LOL. I am not gay, do not have a Kik account and made that up. Jakesthebest568 Jakesthebest568 ( talk) 23:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Lourdes Rodriguez is apart of Young Money. She's working on a project with Reginae. It's on twitter if you need proof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uniquelymadeee ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
...in this (my edit) please? — Statυs ( talk, contribs) 04:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
In reply to what you said here the Run the Jewels is available for free download on the record labels website but you can order a physical album here and the album will be released to retail on July 30, as you can see here. So it wouldn't be correct to call it a mixtape since it wasn't released to DatPiff or Livemixtapes. Koala15 ( talk) 03:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
J.Cole's Manager "IB" discusses the sample being Jennifer Hudson's.
Now at least can we agree on it being an uncredited sample by her?
You're right. I'll change the source to the direct Interview from Vibe Magazine:
The criteria states exactly this: "Professional reviews may include only reviews written by professional music journalists or DJs, or found within any online or print publication having a (paid or volunteer) editorial and writing staff (which excludes personal blogs). The standard for inclusion always is that the review meet Wikipedia's guideline for reliable sources and that the source be independent of the artist, record company, etc." So, it has a writing staff with an editorial team in place, and it is independent of the artist they review. I am not going to stop using the site nor others' like it because the WP:ALBUM/REVSIT is outdated and not current, and it should not be sited to restrict because it is not a policy nor a guideline rather an essay. By the way, REVSIT is greatly discriminatory and biased towards Christian magazines even CCM Magazine, Christianity Today, HM, Worship Leader are not on it, so I do not trust REVSIT, when it comes to the Christian genre in the least. Also, is webzines like Jesus Freak Hideout, New Release Tuesday, Indie Vision Music on this list? Nope. Christian Music Zine is not a personal blog in the least! HotHat ( talk) 02:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
I have started the discussion, so lets talk if you want. HotHat ( talk) 07:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank i taught since it doesn't matter to put the internet champion i go stay their and thank o and when i make my favorite wrestlers to WWE TNA ROH u can be the first to message me or message me on my talk or user talk page so when i make it i go make sure u the first one to review or tell me about it Thanks! STATic Verseatide Dyorkerman ( talk) 21:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi STATic Verseatide. I know you've been around here quite a while, but I'm not sure if you're aware of Wikipedia's guideline regarding canvassing...? Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:54, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
You have notified 13 editors who support your own position on Deadmau5 and would be expected to support your same position on Tech Nine. This is a problem; you are pulling in a biased sample, or at least it has that appearance. I see that in the discussion at Talk:Deadmau5/Archive 1#Requested move 1 there are still quite a few editors who hold an opinion different than yours who could be invited. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Switch Up is not a single, google it. It was a promotional non-commercial song put out just for his fans, hence why it never charted on the hot 100. So i'm not sure why you changed my edit when it was correct.
No it did not chart on the hot 100, it charted on the irrelevant hip hop rap songs chart an i'm not sure why you think i'm making this up, leave my edit. He tweeted that Switch Up is not a single off the album. Proof: https://twitter.com/BigSean/status/320652626431709184
Just because a song is released on itunes doesn't mean it's a single...have you heard of promotional singles? It's 90% of the time when a single flops (see Love This Life by T.I. (hence does not chart well on the hot 100...(aka only chart that matters realistically). Also, a majority of people barely know anything about the album so of course they call it the 3rd single. The artist himself tweeted that the song is not an official single so i don't know why you insist on being bitter about this.
Last time i'm gonna bother replying to this denial. Every single song that comes out before an album is released is labeled as a "single" by iTunes...they're not gonna put "promotional single" in front of the songs name. My source was literally straight from the artist himself so refuting it is just childish.
Good evening. Till I Die also flopped, but that doesn't mean that the song is not the third single of Fortune. Switch Up is the same; it was released as the second official single, deal with it. Greets -- 188.109.161.47 ( talk) 18:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
I added a section called promotional singles due to the fact that he confirmed that they were not singles on twitter (and they didn't make the final track list) so don't flip and change it back because if you look, Beware is the only song that made the final track list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoka1234 ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting Dyorkerman's obvious gimmick infringement on my user page.
I have a sneaking suspicion this guy may be WWEJobber under a sock puppet name, and if it is, he shouldn't be here because he's been banned for mulitple Wiki sins.
Vjmlhds ( talk) 14:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey,
Just wondering, how did you get the message to pop up on your talk page as people leave a message? -- MisterShiney ✉ 19:55, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Done it...I think lol. -- MisterShiney ✉ 20:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Niteshift36 (
talk) has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Seriously, I agree that whole thing went way too far, way too fast. I've seen your edits elsewhere and at AfD and we are usually in agreement. I apologize for my part in how out of hand that got. Niteshift36 ( talk) 20:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
I just replied to the talk page, thanks for bringing it to my attention, I think me personally have his name AUTOGRAPHED TATTOOED on my arm, makes proof enough for it to be moved over, but just in case, i brought up a few points. 2BARQUACK.COM ( talk) 16:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
I run web for Taylor Gang Ent. it's not Taylor Gang Records
If the correct path is to create a page for taylor gang ent and redirect taylor gang records to ent I will.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thunkele ( talk • contribs) 20:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey there. You tell me "There are many many sources that call it that, but thanks for your opioion." but on the Talk page of the film's article you say "A wide variety, if not the majority of these sources do not cite the movie as a comedy at all". Contradicting. Your own research backs my edits, so would you please revert them back? It's very much questionable that the film is a comedy, however it is not questioned at all that's a drama. Presence of humor alone is not a enough to define a comedy as such and that's why most reliable sources (i.e: IMDB) call it a drama. Cataloging it as a comedy will make people come across this movie when looking into, reading about or referencing comedies, and this would be a mistake. Thank you. — Santiago Mendez 06:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkian ( talk • contribs)
Get out of here with that minor edits crap Static. It was a minor edit and you know it. MsScorpioMoon ( talk) 18:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Only we can have a dispute without getting caught :) MsScorpioMoon ( talk) 21:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC) |
Hey Static, I am Joey's publicist. I asked Jason to make the change, as I am not a member on Wiki. His last name is not Scott. Just Virginie. If you can kindly fix, it would be greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.85.84.33 ( talk) 21:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Static,
Thought I gave reason when I made the edit but it's possible it didn't go through. His last name isn't Scott. It's Virginie. This was misreported in a few places and has now "stuck." Let me know if you'd like me to restore the edit or if you would prefer to. Thanks!
You are more than welcome to comment on Ground rules. HotHat ( talk) 07:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Are you okay with the current version of Template:Money in the Bank winners, or should it be reverted back to before the IP's edits yesterday so consensus can be reached about what to change before it's changed? — C.Fred ( talk) 00:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Oh, you bet, that's him. In the last month or two, I've seen him active on a few pages I watch, but they weren't vandal edits so I didn't pursue further blocks. But it looks like he's back on the warpath. Tokyo-area IP editing on American hip hop pages, especially discographical information. Chubbles ( talk) 05:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I assumed CritaCal was just some vandal cause i remember a few months ago he was trying to add himself to No Love Lost (Joe Budden album) as you can see the odd message he left on Talk:No Love Lost (Joe Budden album). Koala15 ( talk) 00:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
I wouldn't add it cause he tends not to receive credit as he told me a few times. Even though i haven't seen the linear notes i would assume if he was credited someone would have added it before today. Koala15 ( talk) 00:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Given the sources, I'm surprised that you decided to CSD A7 this, rather than bring it to AfD. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 07:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Dr. Dre really is 48 years old -- born February 18, 1965? He has a lot of associated acts. Just saying though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrColonelCortez ( talk • contribs) 17:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
The album was released to Google Play as a promotional technique kind of similar to Magna Carta Holy Grail but it wasn't released in stores. It's been stated several times that this is is ninth album but Google Play wanted to release it for free as a promotional technique [11]. Koala15 ( talk) 18:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that in an interview MTV Hive Tech N9ne stated his next album was indeed titled 'Special Effects'. I don't really know how this whole Wikipedia thing works. Sorry for not doing it right the first time. Thanks. -Mitchell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchell McGuire ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I thought that " Switch Up" wasn't a single due to the fact that it hasn't charted well and was never serviced to rhythimic, mainstream radio. Sorry :). Please accept my apology.
Instead of deleting my edits with the justification of "uhmm no", which is just downright disrespectful, how about you actually give a reason for your disagreement with my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icniv ( talk • contribs) 19:03, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Moved to User:STATicVerseatide/Template:Joey Badass. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, why do you think that Nottz' Instagram is not a reliable source for the announcement of the project? L225 ( talk) 08:32, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Some people have been editing MGK's discography page as well as the Black Flag (mixtape) page. I fixed the Black Flag page, but the discography page has had so many edits done that I don't feel confident enough to differentiate good edits from misinformed ones. To summarize the edits: People (mostly unregistered users) are changing Black Flag's status from mixtape to studio album. I tried to explain why i reverted the edits in my latest edit of Black Flag so maybe it will b less likely to happen again, but idk. The discography page still needs editing though, so i'll leave that to you bro. Thanks 4 teaching me this stuff earlier so I could fix it now. ThaPhenom ( talk) 07:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
According to Waka Flocka Flame's main facebook page, the Flockaveli 2 promotional cover has both the BSM and Atlantic Records logo on it. And the page is also verified, just so you know. That's why I put Atlantic on there.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs)
Waka still owns stake of 1017 Brick Squad and Brick Squad Monopoly is a subsidiary of 1017 Brick Squad which is now distributed by Atlantic Records. [1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs)
References
Game is signed to Rolex Records and has left Interscope Records, where's your proof of his current label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs) 21:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Where's your proof and if he's in talks he's still not resigned to them. Also what about Rolex Records why did you change that?— Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs)
He's still not signed to Interscope so please move that back to former.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs)
When there's proof of that you can do that but for now he's not apart of Interscope, and Jesus Piece was released under Interscope so therefore they'll release the singles from the album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ACBContent ( talk • contribs)
I would like to know the reason of deletion of "XO & Co. Inc." It is a established Inc. with copyright and should have be granted a article on wiki.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubvirk ( talk • contribs) 03:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
[12] — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaberToothedCat863 ( talk • contribs) 15:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Over at Talk:30 Seconds to Mars. Cheers! § FreeRangeFrog croak 00:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello STATicVerseatide,
I see you revert edits (Karma Chameleon for example) and you did it right because you have restored my correct revision. Is it possible for you to undo other edits for me please ? I need help. Here's the link where all the "current edits" has to be reverted because they've destroyed my improvements. (I can't undo these edits by myself because I will have problems)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.71.52.42 Synthwave.94 ( talk) 01:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
I think you are wrong, the fact that you don't let me change the genres is ridiculous. First of all, one source is enough to change a genre and second, we are not talking about hip hop. Acording of what you are telling me, we should put Electronic * rock and this is not correct because that is not the genre, the genre is electronic rock and in the same way, electronica is more general and limited. So you should think more about the fact that this is not hip hop, the fact that one VALID source is enough to change the genre and that not necessarily this must have only one or two genres. Thanks. Justasaddream ( talk) 10:29, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I removed it because the ref you cited says nothing about a studio album...also several artists were signed to CTE and didn't have studio albums...also check iTunes, Gibbs and Scrilla both had studio albums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAMM.CO ( talk • contribs) 14:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
If you're referring to the roster changes...Wikipedia can email me directly and I will email them the release paperwork for each artists that was sent out in 2012. This is an edit handled by admin not a fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAMM.CO ( talk • contribs) 14:58, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Dude, tons of websites have already reported the track listing like XXL, HipHopDX, Vibe. How are those not reliable you just sound foolish. Koala15 ( talk) 17:11, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright, but i still can't remember Amazon ever being wrong. Koala15 ( talk) 17:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I currently opened a peer assess for the article Nicki Minaj videography, I was hoping that you could take a look, leave feedback for improvement and contribute to the article where you see it's nessessary. If you can help it would be appreciated. :-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Nicki_Minaj_videography/archive1 KaneZolanski ( talk) 12:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm confused, but its okay! Chicago Wiz 16:35, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Oh! You were saying if the song has charted on the Hot 100 already, then there is no need for the Digital and Airplay because they're basically "adding up to" the Hot 100! I might've confused you there, but I do understand what you're saying now! Chicago Wiz 22:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Although I agree the consensus for infobox album is a little muddled, in principle project access agreed that {{ flat list}} is more accessible than a standard comma-separated lists. On the basis that I had already added {{ flat list}} to Don't Look Down and there is no specific reason for their removal, I've reverted your removal of the template. On the basis that you have removed it because you dislike the template and prefer the way that comma lists look, yet time and effort was made to put the template in place so it shouldnt have been removed. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Great work with Yeezus. Are you planning on getting that to Good status soon, given it's the only album left to make a Kanye West studio albums Good Topic? igordebraga ≠ 02:44, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey man. FINALLY someone gave Alchemist the picture he needed thank you! But I re-edited it and added back the upcoming projects section. Every one of them is true. Trust me Im a VERY VERY big fan of ALC. I follow him on Twitter with notifications on every Tweet he writs on my iPhone. I know. I even put reference to every thing. Untill now I did ALL of the Alchemist's page a lone. I rebuilt it, added a LOT of writing, wrote ALL the history of his collabs and more. You can look it up in the editing history. Do not come and delete whatever you want just because. It will be much appreciated. -- Orr971 ( talk) 13:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey why did you revert me. I was reverting him. He made an edit which was reverted, and instead of starting a discussion, he blatantly continued warring. Im not the one warring and It shouldnt be my place to start the discussion. If he wants the change made, then he should should start the discussion. I and three other people have warned him and told him to start the discussion. Either the page is supposed ti stay as it was while the discussion is going on. BlackDragon 18:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
But what if there will be more upcoming albums with no date. I think that this note Should be there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orr971 ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Its not my opinion if you listen to the artists then you will realize why i changed the genres, just because there is no link does not stop what you hear. its not disruptive as there is no pop genre added to a metal band page, Hopsin makes positive, alternative and conscious hip hop that's why i added the genres. In the normal broad term hip hop is referring to radio hip hop and Hopsin is an underground artist. as for Unearth, they are not generally "Metalcore" they have thrash tendencies recently and have a metallic hardcore influence of Hatebreed. they have introspective lyrics that make you think, not what modern Metalcore means now talking about relationships and hearbreak. So why change it back when its clearly heard when you listen to them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Extremevic ( talk • contribs) 18:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
A link for Hopsin? here. And if you don't think "Raw" is positive, then you clearly cant hear. The track "Nocturnal Rainbows" is about being blind to the decay of society and against drug use, that is positive hip hop or Conscious hip hop.
Download" Money and the power" on Itunes. and go to info and you will see " Produced by N4, Ned & Jonathan lauture. "i hold a share of this record" Not sure why my name is not attached. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.246.82.94 ( talk) 06:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
What do you need? Who do you need to speak to in order for my credit to remain. I feel like Wikipedia & the ITUNES Download are that strongest source of information regarding my credit. Wikipedia is relying on other blog sites for their information but these blogs sites are missing info like my credit. I can a sure you that it wont be a problem having my name attached because i did produce this record, N4 and Ned know this. I own a Share of this record! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatproducer ( talk • contribs) 21:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
What would you need. Someone From the Label to contact you? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.194.22.132 (
talk) 06:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Yo, so why can't I put mixtape articles up here. I've always looked at an artist's discography or whatever, seen that there mixtape doesn't have a page and wished that there was, so that I could see you know like who the producers are, the actual tracklisting. I mean Gucci Mane's comes out with a new mixtape his shit's on here, I don't see why Yelawolf's can't be. And the way I see it, isn't more information better? It's not like I'm deleting important album articles and replacing them with mixtape ones. But it's your call, much love brother.
Alright, I understand now, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckT187 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
"So you made it longer?" isn't exactly as civil as you ask others to be in your "rules," but I will rewrite to keep it under 700 words. It's better to have a coherent synopsis than what was there. Could you please explain why you hadn't tagged it before now? It was too long according to the guidelines as it was then, too. PacificBoy 20:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I think you've misunderstood my point. I didn't claim that we should label these band pages as solely "
rock". I just thought that your reason for removing the two other genres was the "aim for generality" issue. Thank you.
Myxomatosis57 (
talk) 18:24, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, EleventhBlock. I am wondering whether you think it would be okay to remove the date "August 20, 2013" due to the fact that the date is a week away and a cover art and a track listing hasn't been released. Hall of Fame is being released two weeks from today and a track listing and a track listing has been released days ago. Sounds unrealistic. 11Block | talk 22:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to message you in terms of an edit request on the Trap Lord article, the debut album from Asap Ferg. I am requesting if you would be able to add production credits to the track Cocaine Castle on the track list within the article. The song is produced by Subdaio and HighClassFilth. The credits are actually on Twitter you can search them. It would be great if you can do this simple edit. You can look up these two producers on Google etc, they are both accredited and well respected up-comers.
Twitter credits: [18]
I'm hoping to hear a response back from you soon, thanks!
Njdon89 ( talk) 02:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Here you go: Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://soundcloud.com/subdaio/cocaine. Drum pattern was made by Subdaio. The synths were made by HighClassFilth. They both teamed up to work on the production. You can read it in the beat description.
Njdon89 (
talk) 20:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok cool, I guess we will wait til the album releases with the production credits in the booklet. Thanks. Njdon89 ( talk) 17:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Here is another source, RapGenius is a very reliable source and it is posted here as well, please do take consideration in this because it is not fair for a producer to not receive the credit he or she deserves when they have put their time and effort to it. Thanks. RapGenius: [19] [1] Njdon89 ( talk) 17:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Can you please instruct me on how to dispute this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LordQuest ? I've spent weeks in the US landing placements with major artists for LordQuest he is verified by reliable sources according to Wiki standards why is there any question of deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Positivibes ( talk • contribs) 04:29, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
UGHH is always correct with producer credits it is a retail site that has the albums in advanced and it was correct with all the production credits that were already listed so how could they be wrong. Maybe Chad Hugo produced the song but just isn't credited in the booklet, where else would we ever find a source for these producers anyway until we do we should just keep the info. Koala15 ( talk) 17:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Is Discogs reliable enough for you? Cause they have the same credits listed right here. Koala15 ( talk) 17:43, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
We are never gonna get a correct source for the production credits, so what are we just gonna have to trust people that bought the album with adding the credits? I would rather just use the source. Koala15 ( talk) 18:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for this – I'd been humming and ha-ing about it for a little while, as those were singles all released when that was the primary format that Khalifa released his work in (similar to "Otherside" (Remix) by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis). However, I have one question: was " Hate Bein' Sober" actually a single? I can't find any digital download release, or radio release date, that suggests that it was. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 12:44, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
(It's just occurred to me how odd it is how we're both spending all this time debating over one tiny aspect of a moderately well-known song when there are far more important articles on more widely discussed encyclopedic topics that could use our care and attention. But I just don't have the motivation...) I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the article for PartyNextDoor, I didn't have time to finish it. I need to make an article for the self-titled mixtape as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jevon Tompkins ( talk • contribs)
This should really warrant a much stronger warning. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 18:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I saw you edits and edit comments and I had all the facts I just wasn't sure how to word it properly so it would sound right and not copy the source info, but next time I will include all the facts. Casey.Grim85 ( talk) 21:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
If you are that much pinpoint then nowhere you'll find a professional reviewer stating "this is a stoner rock record" because that sounds very much inane and amateurish. And the latter review (of themusic.co.au) clearly states in the concluding passages that, "call it hard rock or sludge metal what you want.....". -- Shallowmead077 ( talk) 07:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
My source is simple by watching Monday Night Raw and visiting WWE.Com it states that Ricardo Rodriguez is Rob Van Dam's new manager so I placed Ricardo Rodriguez under the correct section on Van Dam's page maybe instead of changing my edit you could take the time yourself to see if what I did was correct since you seem on making the decision on what I edited was incorrect JMichael22 ( talk) 01:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Recently this article was nominated for deletion (as its indicated on the creators talk page). I added a reference to it, and I think its good to go now. If not, ping me and I will be happy to look for more references, although music is not my strength (at least not this type of genre).-- Mishae ( talk) 00:38, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
I left a detailed message at User_talk:Koala15#Album_notability demonstrating my point. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 23:47, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
there's absolutely no reason to have to cite the fact that Roscoe Dash in on the song "it's time"
listen to the song and you'll hear he's on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.23.68 ( talk) 23:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
How are you going to deny Roscoe Dash's vocals on the song, when they can be CLEARLY heard. Again I say, listen to the song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsaroce ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Big Sean's page says "Kanye West" why is that there? Please tell me that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrColonelCortez ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for editing my edit on Snoop Dog page.
Like I said BMI
[24] and my other websites lists his first name as Cordozar while others, like IMDb, list him as Broadus. Although IMDb
[25] also lists his grandparent as Cordozar Calvin Broadus Sr., making Snoop's first name Cordozar.
Your comment was «BMI lists last name then first name.»
Songwriter/Composer: BROADUS (last name) CORDOZAR (first name) CALVIN (middle name)
Current Affiliation: BMI
CAE/IPI #: 280557260
Tell me your thoughts. :)
Filipe Barros 17:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Darkfreakxx7 (
talk •
contribs)
yeah you're probably right, maybe "Having Sex" was just on one of his mixtapes... but the CDQ of "One Thousand" and "Having Sex" are out, so why'd you remove the official times? Distortiondude ( talk) 00:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
meet me at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Berzerk_.28song.29_brewing_edit_war.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
There is no reliable source that says "Survival" is on The Marshall Mathers LP 2. Neither Eminem or his label have confirmed that song to be on the album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bananasownapple ( talk • contribs) 21:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Static the reason why I've edited the label, instruments, and website information is because I've researched that information. His album booklet contains the name of the record company the album is under. Also, he produces his own music from time to time, which was also confirmed in his album booklets and he even spoke about producing his own music in interviews on YouTube. Lastly, that wasn't my Facebook information, that is his Facebook. He has his Instagram and Twitter linked to his Facebook profile. So, when he tweets from his verified profile on Twitter, it is posted on his Facebook wall. Also, an in an interview, he said that his Facebook name was, at the time, Rother Vandross, but it has changed since then. I'm friends with him on Facebook and I also follow him on Twitter. I am not a vandal, I'm just editing the page with current and legitimate information because he is one of my favorite artists. Thanks and have a blessed day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RodneyP43 ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Pardon me? I have every right to change age, as SpaceGhostPurpp thanked me individually for it. I think you do not realize how serious I am about wikipedia, I wake up and I brush my teeth reading an article on the toothbrush, I get changed looking at an article on clothes.. You don't understand.. This website birthed me, and I'm doing everything in my right to keep it from vandals. The information is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Staplemaverick ( talk • contribs) 04:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
I believe you are mistaken. I did not add any content of any kind to the article, I actually deleted a statement that was not in accordance with Wikipedia's Assume good faith behavioral guidelines. I do understand the mistake however and forgive you for it. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Japalion9 ( talk • contribs) 05:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Alright i will do that though i don't think it really matters. Koala15 ( talk) 17:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you think there is no other significant Ryback. See my oppose comment on the noteworthiness of the historian. Dovid ( talk) 17:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
After no one that you said was on the CTE roster was on the CTE album...will you admit you were wrong? I'm gonna guess not, glad I know you are tho. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAMM.CO ( talk • contribs) 03:01, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi STATicVerseatide. I'm sure you meant best when reverting my edit of the heading "Confirmed tracks" to "Recorded tracks", but I kept "Recorded tracks" because I don't want this to be another Detox (seeing how many "confirmed" tracks were later scrapped). And something about the word "confirmed" seems crystal ball-ish and unencyclopedic. Maybe we can use just "Tracks" perhaps? I know a release date is given and there're only a few months left, but things can change at the last minute. "Berzerk" and "Survival" are most likely going to make it to the album, but just to be sure... — WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 22:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Please check the text at WP:ALBUMS/SOURCES#Sources to avoid paragraph 3. "Online retailers such as iTunes and Amazon.com should also be avoided. ... Track listings, release dates, record label, album covers and track lengths can all be found at Allmusic.— Iknow23 ( talk) 06:43, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Now, I see what you mean about Allmusic only listing CD here. They USED TO show Digital also. What happened? But if you really insist on WP:ALBUMS/SOURCES that's the one to use.— Iknow23 ( talk) 06:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I am removing these refs because they are spam. If you continue to replace them we will be in dispute. Jodosma ( talk) 20:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
That was a reliable source though (view tweet here: https://twitter.com/uugwuu/status/373525836105670658). He (Reggie Ugwu) works for Billboard and interviewed Drake for Billboard (see here: http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/the-juice/5679937/drakes-nothing-was-the-same-the-billboard-cover-story) and he also works for Complex Magazine (you could've figured these things out if he read his bio or google him). Drake and Best Buy have already confirmed there is a deluxe edition of NWTS but I guess they haven't confirmed which one of the two belongs to which, so you can keep that as 'alternate cover' for now, but you need to add those three songs to the confirmed tracks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bowlerboy08 ( talk • contribs) 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
.This MRivera25 .i got your message i first started using wikipedia 2 years ago and i dont know alot about it. i made changes to Channel Orange and Earl because i'v been meaning to change it for awhile because i feel as if the artist's music sounds one way but label it as another i change it SORRY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRivera25 ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
.OK I'LL MAKE SURE I DO THE RESEARCH FIRST BEFORE I EDIT — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRivera25 ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC) . Look I apoligize for my meltdown, OK it wasnt anything personal alright it was just me not thinking first alright so im sorry deeply.and i will make sure that doesnt happen in the future alright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRivera25 ( talk • contribs) 16:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
You serious, right? Cashis is not part of Shady Records anymore! Also, County Hound 2 is his second EP, not his second studio album, stupid! This needs to be changed back right now!! That was not cool!!! Skylar3214 4:59, 1 September 2013
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chinx Drugz. Since you had some involvement with the Chinx Drugz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). T C N7JM 01:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you got to the article as I was going to restore it to (actor). I think since the original move was from (actor) that probably is the default, but this may deserve a RM. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 23:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted an edit I made -- are you saying that the IMDB.com is an unreliable source? Partyclams ( talk) 22:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Can you take a look at the articles that Billboarder22 has contributed/created? (You marked one of his/hers for speedy deletion.) They all have multiple issues - lots of smoke and mirrors. Several have already been deleted. I got so irritated reading them that I question my own neutrality. Thanks. RBDowing ( talk) 16:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey sorry to bother you but, please can you add a wiki page about pro era for example (Kirk Knight, CJ Fly or Nyck Caution, etc.) (9~6~13). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Og alchemizt ( talk • contribs) 00:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
What other way am I supposed to verify that I produced that beat if I wasn't credited? You have to understand that makes me really mad especially since this isn't a bias statement or a way of promotion. I'm actually telling the truth, if i went to court about this subject I would have all the right evidence to win the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistamidnight ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I had no control over the credits, Chief Keef didn't credit me and I've already spoken to him about it. He said he would tell Lil Reese to change it but nothing happened. It isn't my fault why I didn't get credited. Try seeing things from my point of view. I'm getting no recognition for my hard work and it's not easy to get your music to a major artist either. Just look at this tweet he made about me, I'm not lying for exposure https://twitter.com/ChiefKeef/status/289685606169202689 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistamidnight ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your greeting. Can I ask you a question? You are a WP:REVIEWER, but I have never seen infoboxes like one on the page ru:Очень страшное кино 5 (21 edits have not been reviewed yet) or ru:Caran d’Ache (this article has never been reviewed yet). Where can I see these infoboxes? Sergey Cepblu ( talk) 18:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I wrote translations in brackets.
You may read some information about flagged versions on Russian Wikipedia (in English). As I can see now, this proposal failed in English Wikipedia, also I found some articles (there were just 10 articles awaiting review—this is very few). Naya Rivera—the latest accepted version was accepted on 7 September 2013. There is 1 pending revision awaiting review. This is what I was looking for. Thanks. Sergey Cepblu ( talk) 13:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Can you point out for me where you see the No.59 for R&B chart in this source as you have indicated in this edit? When R&B chart peaks are selected on Billboard for Wale, there is no peak for "Poor Decision". What makes you assume that removing unverifiable peaks constitutes disruptive editing?-- Harout72 ( talk) 19:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Bubbling Under peaks can be included, but only in footnotes.
WP:Record charts is explicit that the songs are to be listed as uncharted with a footnote indicating the Bubbling Under position. Bubbling Under charts do not extend the main charts. They are related, certainly, but they are not an extension.—
Kww(
talk) 23:46, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Noticed you moved it to the bottom, is there a particular rule on this? I've noticed some pages have at the top and some at the bottom? KiraChinmoku ( T, ¤) 23:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
What if i just identify it as a song instead of a single? Can i just count it as a promo since it has a music video and a cover art? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drizzy010 ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Can't i just identify this song as a promo at least since it has a music video and a cover art? Drizzy010 ( talk) 19:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi mate. You want to discuss your changes here or on the talk page?-- Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 19:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok befor eI edit further I just want to clarify something(s): Does the discography for an artist have to include all of their works with others such as a group or collaboration album? Also the rules behind the discography have been changed so many times. Are these rules voted adn then put into effect? Who exactly decides them? And I'm assuming the ideal discography sections should emulate the ones on Too Short and 50 Cent's articles? Banan14kab ( talk) 06:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
In expressing opinion at Wikipedia:BOTREQ#TedderBot_replacement. If enough people comment there, maybe something will finally happen. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Here's a recognition for your long-time service at Wikipedia. Dealing with all those harmful edits over the years deserves a proper award. Keep up the good work. Вик Ретлхед ( talk) 07:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hi there - please discuss the expiration date from the DNAU template on Talk:Bradley Manning, before engaging in any further editing. That way we can all avoid an edit war. (: Thank you. CaseyPenk ( talk) 21:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I don't care what you say. I will always leave order of death sections.
You claim its unpublished? I sourced (with two sources), my last one I did. You didn't accept them. Further, you say there is a ban on original research? Then how does any film have a plot. I checked the plot section for dozens of movies, none of which have citations. Show me where there are cites or "non-original" research in any of the plots, and I will concede this point to you.
Lists are not banned by Wikipedia rules (they are discouraged, but it does say that they are appropriate in some cases and I can point you to hundreds of lists on Wikipedia).
The Order of Deaths goes directly to the plot, so it is not "trivia."
You are also not the king of Wikipedia, and I will continue to do this. It is useful, relevant and properly included. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
174.79.35.85 (
talk) 23:02, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I need you to restore the Beautiful Onyinye single. You don't have the right to delete it. You are praticing vandalism. versace1608 22:28, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
How does it? You need to specifically explain that to me rather than just gave me that. According to Wikipedia, "Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject[1] of multiple, non-trivial[2] published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label." Here are several notable links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lY2H2ZP56K4; http://www.okayafrica.com/2012/06/12/video-p-square-x-rick-ross-beautiful-onyinye/; http://www.bellanaija.com/2012/06/12/bn-video-premiere-p-square-feat-rick-ross-beautiful-onyinye-remix/
"1.Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts." African songs aren't popular like American and European songs and there's not a lot of information online. Also, there isn't a major music chart website like billboard. The closest thing to Billboard in Africa is Afribiz Top 100 chart, a weekly chart that compiles music from West, East, Central, and Southern Africa.
"2.Has won one or more significant awards or honors, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award." Again, something that's not known worldwide can't possibly get nominated for the aforementioned awards, can it?
"3.Has been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands, or groups." Beautiful Onyinye has been released as a recording. The track is on iTunes. Here's the link: https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/beautiful-onyinye-feat.-rick/id580462837?i=580462842
I've dissected Wikipedia's statements and don't see why "Beautiful Onyinye" doesn't qualify as a "notable song".
Wikipedia also states:"Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created."
According to the above statement, you don't have the right to delete the single because if it isn't "notable", the information should be "contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created."
Whatever angle you look at it from, you're wrong for deleting the "Beautiful Onyinye" article. I see that you've written numerous hip hop articles. How would you like it if I deleted your articles and tell you, " WP:NSONGS"? I'm pretty sure you wouldn't appreciate people who don't give 2 cents about your contribution to wikipedia. versace1608 23:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
P.S, there are numerous hip-hop, pop, country, and etc songs that haven't been nominated for any of the awards listed above. Yet, there are articles of them on Wikipedia. The last time I check, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia aimed at educating the word through information. If articles about P-Square (one of Africa's biggest musical duo) and other african musicians aren't created, how can people who are trying to learn about these artists know about them?
I am not threatening you. I only said you wouldn't appreciate it if someone else deleted your work. I can't delete your work and don't want to. I, unlike you, appreciate people's contributions to Wikipedia. "So you admit the song has not charted on any major music chart, and has not been nominated for any major awards?" There are numerous songs on Wikipedia that do not have chart singles and nominations. Why don't you delete them? Just because a song doesn't have charts information and nominations, doesn't mean it doesn't deserve to have an article. P-Square have other songs that have recieved accolades. Not every song an artist makes recieve nominations and awards. To say that an article needs to recieve accolades before its worthy to have a Wikipedia article is very bias my friend. If that was the case, all the tens of thousands of articles on Wikipedia should be deleted and you should delete them because you are the founder of Wikipedia and you made the rules. I am tired exchanging words with you. I am going to find an administrator who's not bias; moreover, someone who understand and can appreciate contributor's works.versace1608 00:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
As I have already told you this article is not eligible for CSD#A7 as there is a "credible claim of significance or importance" namely the collaboration with other notable musicians and the release of a number of albums. Giant Snowman 13:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Please look at the article and see how notable it is: I think WP:BEFORE should have applied here. Same with Salah Edin, which I'm asking to be restored--he's got three albums, at least one with TopNotch, and there's plenty of news coverage. I consider both of these nominations a bit hasty. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 14:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
"Not sure what that is but it would need a reliable source."
is a picture take from placebo fans worldwide forum alright? cause someone posted a picture which shows the songs on the live at rak studios dvd. by the way, it from the digipak version and box set of loud like love. violetcries ( talk) 21:33, 14 September 2013
Hi there,
I received a notification from you on the article that I posted about Songsbury. I am not quite understanding the reason for possible deletion as the article is unbiased and has valid references to support the items within the article. If you have detected any bias, would you be able to pinpoint the exact place as to where it is in the article and I'd be more than happy to rephrase it.
Thanks for your help
-- Songsbury ( talk) 21:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
The article is not an autobiography and I do not represent the artist I'm writing about. I'm a fan of the artist and the band that he is in. I'm a little unsure about how the subject may not be deemed notable as I have provided the proper references. How does it work with the administrators? How long does it take for them to make a decision on the article? I'm new to wikipedia as a contributor and I have other articles and contributions to articles I'd like to make, so I'm trying to better understand how the system and format goes.
Thanks again
-- Songsbury ( talk) 21:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm realizing that now...but it's a little too late to change. Although the articles were overall about the band, the artist was the one being interviewed and the journalist had asked questions about the artists music history and accomplishments. I thought that would've been an adequate reference to the details I posted. I will see what other reputable references I can find about the artist.
Thanks for your time and insight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Songsbury ( talk • contribs) 22:17, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Perfect. I will do more digging and will request a name change as well. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Songsbury ( talk • contribs) 22:42, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
I have responded to your comment on my my talkpage. Regards, Woody ( talk) 22:29, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
"Gudda Gudda (rapper)" is an unnecessarily long title per WP:PRECISION. Why don't you ask User:Courcelles to unsalt the original page so we can move it there? 2Flows ( talk) 08:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
It's from the actual physical copy that i have smh — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonXXYoung ( talk • contribs) 15:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
hi, on 2chainz ft Fergie 'netflix' i am credited in the booklet as additional production and programming under DJA, as well as my writing credit under my real name Derek Allen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blkmsk ( talk • contribs) 08:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I used "Edit Beta" which probably messed up the source and I didn't realise that as I didn't even compare the changes. Re-edited it now by editing the source. Being a member of wikipedia for only the last 10 minutes, your message is clearly not what I was expecting :( Not the best way to welcome people, but hey...thats you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gulliverrr ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hey! Sure, I can make the Welcome To Forever discography page. I wasn't sure if I should since his other mixtapes don't have pages. I'll start it tomorrow & have it up as soon as possible. Thank you. NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 22:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
why is chris brown associated with lil wayne — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrColonelCortez ( talk • contribs) 01:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I was wondering what happened to the wiki page for "Runway Star", after the changes were made her page redirects to "The Makerz" page which is currently under proposed deletion.
How can I get Runway Star's wiki back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefuture2027 ( talk • contribs) 01:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
heres the source i used for the drake producers... can you please restore them since you deleted it http://www18.zippyshare.com/v/41093650/file.html
You may want to read User talk:Davidwr#Runway Star (Conflict of Interest). davidwr/( talk)/( contribs) 17:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Could you please review the articles that I wrote for Fly Union and TGTC (The Greater Than Club) (Album). Feedback would be greatly appreciated as these are the first two articles that I have ever written on Wikipedia. Malcolmrevere ( talk) 04:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to thank you in a bit more personal way! For all your help, it's very appreciated :) NanishaOpaenyak ( talk) 01:32, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Okay I know I didn't put any reliable sources to show the vocals are there, but I have ears, and the least you could do was post a source instead of removing the *true* edit I made. Distortiondude ( talk) 13:43, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
EDIT: The NWTS page now has the Birdman outro (not posted by myself) on it without a source, but it hasn't been taken down... hmmm? Distortiondude ( talk) 13:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=AP.9_(rapper) - i add 2 references that i can find. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GENR12 ( talk • contribs) 06:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Since you're gonna be ignorant and direct me to "promotional singles" definition on here, go look at "buzz single/advance single" off the same page. That's what those other songs are so stop ruining album info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoka1234 ( talk • contribs) 07:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
It seems that the IP guy was right. From CNBC:
The code will make available for purchase at the special price of $8.99 an edition of The Marshall Mathers LP 2 featuring not only the track “Survival,” but also a bonus, exclusive studio track.
I'm not trying go berzerk on you or anything, as I'm aware original reports were stating that "Survival" was the only bonus track. Zach Vega ( talk to me) 22:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
It was not a good faith edit but there is no source currently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guidorulz ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't treat me like a first time editor. Thank you. As for the article, the source is there now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guidorulz ( talk • contribs) 02:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
I think you have misinterpreted the issues of edit warring. 1-no one has claimed I am wrong to state that Jay-Z is African-American, they have just stated that I am putting the notice of such in the wrong place. Each time I have placed it in a different place. I have placed it in a different way. So This is an overly broad interpretation of edit warring. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 15:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Alrighty, so if I can find sources I can add them to the page? Does it have to be multiple sources, or just one showing him doing the move?
Rebel Pattern ( talk) 07:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Per MOS:CO, "should not conceal article content" does not exclude track listings, and the track listings do not "consolidate information covered in the main text", as the names of all the tracks are not covered in the main text. With a name like Wikimedia Foundation, I feel we must respect people who use text only web browsers. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 18:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear user: You left a rather harsh message on my talk page stating that I made "unconstructive edits" to Escape Plan. I hate to inform you that you have been misinformed as I made no such edits. This being Friday night and all, I'm assuming that you are in a bad mood after a hard week's work and am ignoring your insolence. However, I will leave you with this suggestion, that before you post messages on other user's talk pages, you take a deep breath and count to ten before writing you message. This way, all Wikipedia will benefit.
Thank you and good night. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6002:6:5489:3696:24D7:3041 ( talk) 01:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
I see you are going to changing your username. Just curious... ///EuroCar GT 20:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Its is always referred to World Wrestling Entertainment while WWE is only a trade name We should rename the title to World Wrestling Entertainment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma Hrishi ( talk • contribs) 04:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for telling me about my mistakes. Can you tell me why there is no move button in WWE article. I am a autoconfirmed user(4 days,10 edits) Also can you tell me how can i start a requested move thanks in advance... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma Hrishi ( talk • contribs) 10:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for creating incorrect redirects. I did not realize I was viewing an unreliable source before, which is quite embarrassing. I hope the additional redirects I created are valid and adhere to the manual of style. If you are able, please feel free to assist with the deletion of the incorrect redirects I created before. Thank you. (Next time I will be more careful!) -- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |