This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your recent edit to Puffkins ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 05:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
I was in the process of doing so, check the reason for why I did Zero X Marquis 01:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, my mistake, thanks for giving a clear reference...l8r. -CaptainJade9
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. abakharev 07:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
This appears to be a content dispute, not vandalism. I'm going to ask everyone involved to read WP:V: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth." Unsourced data can be removed at any time by any editor. Thanks. :) RadioKirk ( u| t| c) 07:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Can you please remember to sort out your differences with other editors using the discussion page rather than getting into an edit war. (Same message left at other talk pages) -- Fr a ncs2000 File:Flag of Buckinghamshire.png 09:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. abakharev 07:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
This is megasean3000, telling you that i was wrong about Silk Spinner and that it's Silk Spitter, and for those mistakes, i apoligize. If that's okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megasean3000 ( talk • contribs)
The AfD tag was removed because the original creator of the tag tagged the article due to bias against the user. However if the tag was replaced by a non-bias user the tag will not be removed. The initial AfD was vandalism, therefore I was inclined to remove it. However, now it will not be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.248.218.111 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, it's megasean3000 again, if you don't mind can you show me how to upload images onto wikapedia. If you don't mind. Because i have some interesting images of Xiaolin Showdown ready to upload. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megasean3000 ( talk • contribs)
Yes, there is a policy forbidding exactly this; see here. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about any confusion I may have caused with my little rant. The meatpuppet accusations are just a major sore spot with me -- they're completely false, but I have no way to actually prove it. - TPIRFanSteve 05:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Ive Got a Better picture of Kimiko in my pictures, how do I get it on there?— Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
sorry for having the truth bud,I hope I dident offend you or make you think for a second. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelsmades6 ( talk • contribs)
E-mail me and i will destroy you with words joelsmades6@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelsmades6 ( talk • contribs)
why are you so afraid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelsmades6 ( talk • contribs)
I added specials to List of Super Sentai episodes, from the articles of both Sentai series. July 7, 2006 15:09 Philippine time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.213.94.83 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry for accidentally reverting your change to Kyouryuu Sentai ZyuRanger re: Zyu2 while reverting the episode list blanking. It was not my intent. jgp ( T| C) 07:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I tried to add categories to two Userboxes I created, {{ User City of Heroes}} and {{ User City of Villains}}. I can see that the categories are listed on my user page, but when I check the category (at least for the City of Heroes one) it only lists one user, and no others. What did I do wrong? Ryulong 08:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
How exactly do I make a dummy edit? The help page isn't that clear. Ryulong 07:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I recently listed the article Kyoryuu Sentai ZyuRanger 2 for deletion because of copyvio and the lack of notability due to a much more well written section on the subject of the article placed on another related article ( Mighty Morphin Power Rangers). This afternoon, I found that another article, this one entitled Zyu2 (which is the more widely accepted term for the content in the first article) was linked to the section of the Power Rangers article, and I put an AfD on it and added it to the currently ongoing AfD for the first article. It was essentially a copy and paste of the section about Zyu2 in the Power Rangers article, and I'm wondering if this was the right thing to do. I don't know if I should have instead listed it for speedy deletion, or perhaps made it a redirect to the currently AfD'd "Kyoryuu Sentai ZyuRanger 2". For the more established editors, what should I do? Ryulong 19:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Um, why we're my changes problematic? That page was not organized correctly. Catastros did not need to be a heading, it should either be put in a new scetion, or be a bold title to go along with the mention of all other megazords. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.108.15 ( talk • contribs)
It from devient art. a website that has fanart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
Yes that was I was talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for putting the copyright on it, pal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
Hey about those edits to Tommy Oliver, I didn't realize that they divide the section so that you could edit single season. I appreciate you sending me a message though and getting it out of the way, otherwise, we would just be deleting each other's work for no reason. I am an avid Power Rangers fan and am looking forward to making the Power Rangers section the best it can be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclerico89 ( talk • contribs)
{{ Power Rangers Characters}} Yea no problem. Hey I have a question. I have no idea how to edit the above box. Can you tell me? Thanks for the help.-- Unclerico89 03:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, I wish to add more characters to it, namely Kira Ford and Ethan James. I am a huge Dino Thunder fan and am currently expanding their files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclerico89 ( talk • contribs)
Oh, I get it now. Thanks a lot, man. Hey one last thing, how come whenever I go to change the picture of Tommy Oliver (the one in his infobox), the image won't show.-- [User:Unclerico89|Unclerico89]] 04:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to put a Dino Thunder pic of Tommy in to make it more up to date. The pic is Tommy89.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclerico89 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry I don't have any photos of Sebastian, but I'll keep my eye out. Only one I've seen is the more a drawing than a photo, and I think you included that on the page (which, by the way, is quite good!). MiamiDolphins3 23:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
So, what's up with the new blocking stuff that's mentioned on WP:AN that people are thinking of permablocking all of unregistered AOL editors? Ryulong 01:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Heh--I was just adding a sockpuppet/meatpuppet warning about 202.163.208.50 when you made your edit to WP:AIV mentioning his presence, but I got caught by the edit conflict. How's that for coincidence? jgp ( T| C) 05:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I was browsing around a category and found some pages that didn't seem notable: Power Rangers Theme Tune, V-Lancer, and The Best of the Power Rangers: The Ultimate Rangers. I listed these pages for deletion, with "Power Rangers Theme Tune" as the main article that the others were listed under as a multiple AfD. Where I originally found the first article about a random single non-notable, it was revealed through the AfD discussion that this single hit #3 on the UK Singles charts and passes WP:MUSIC and is notable. I rescinded my delete for that article, but I now feel that the two articles I listed with it may also be considered as part of the Keep reasons as they are now unrelated to the header article. I attempted to relist the articles as {{ db-context}} but they were subsequently removed because I have them still listed as AfD for the Theme Tune article. I do not know what to do now. Remove the other two articles from the AfD and relist them as db-context, start an entirely new AfD for them, or do nothing. Ryulong 01:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't do much good to respond here and then immediately archive. :) Anyway, the ...but... comment was paraphrased from User:Dawson's suggestion on the irc channel #wikipedia-bootcamp. I think what you did was fine. — WAvegetarian• (talk) 03:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah I looked at that note and your submission awhile ago and I just found that Ninja Sentai Kakuranger has descriptions in their mecha page and possibly in some of their character description page which I traced back to that same user have descriptions from a former Sentai page that is no longer active called Skull Corps which I reconize since I used to travel to when I started on gathering data on Super Sentai, the descriptions can also be found and that the summary was posted last April. - Adv193 01:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
ok. SerpentsTail
I do not see any real vandalism in the contributions of the 202....IP's you reported, only changes which could be made in good faith (see here). Have you tried talking to the user(s) who are making the changes?. Cheers. Lectonar 07:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for putting the sock puppet thing on Bluecanoe, I forgot. Also, what's the tag for the American English userbox, I'd like to put that on mine? Thanks. -- Awiseman 20:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my entry in the Articles for Deletion log. I should have previewed. ... discospinster talk 02:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I know that vandals generally don't revert, but is there a way that recent vandalism to my User page be removed completely from its history? I really don't need the threat of the anus image back through an asshole's (no pun intended) reversions. Ryulong 07:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
If you don't mind losing the earlier record of edit's I'd be fine to delete your userpage and restore only the last good version, though this would make some of your edits counts as deleted edits (which might bother some). -- Alf melmac 07:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Nice job, Junior. Ninja Storm Power Rangers looks good. You really showed dedication and follow-through. ACS (Wikipedian) 07:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi not sure if you are aware but:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in 4chan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
Others are watching the page for vandalism Regards-- A Y Arktos\ talk 23:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I have placed this article under Wikipedia:Deletion review if you would like to be involved. Thanks! OSU80 02:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
This is Tyler111, how do you archive things. Thanks for the info if you can help. Tyler111
Looks like another sockpuppet. I reverted this puppet's edits to Joseph Patrick Moore. And to think they are going to actually keep the article around when obvious puppets are attempting to advertise. blah! OSU80 00:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
User's behavior is not simple vandalism. Try to talk to the user or bring it up on WP:ANI not WP:AIV. Thanks. JoshuaZ 02:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
smells like a wet sock(puppet) to me. Shows up on Wiki today (7/18), makes a lot of trivial edits to articles about various notable bassists, and then spams Joseph Patrick Moore with a ton o' links. Oh, and on the talk page, he claims that Moore was "endorsed by the Weather Channel". [2]
What think you?
-- EngineerScotty 05:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah it's funny how they've already ran the check user for user:Blnguyen here but have yet to give yours attention which was posted the day before his. I've been given the impression on IRC that they play favorites there. There aren't even any clerk notes yet. OSU80 00:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my WP:AIV report. [3] I need to report that as a bug. -- Gogo Dodo 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
You know what happens when vandals can't get a rise out of you anymore...? ..they get bored, and realize it's more productive to fix things, rather than break them-- AOL account (205.188.116.200) 00:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
If you happen to actually look at the show, you will find out that they were called by their dinosaur name: Red Tyranno, Yellow Ptera, Blue Tricera, Black Brachio & White Drago - not Red Dino, Blue Dino, etc. Please check your facts, Ryulong, and get off my back about this... Sonic_Shadow 11:16 July 20, 2006 (UTC)
Well, the website is wrong... take for example Power Rangers: Ninja Storm; Shane, Dustin & Tori were called the Wind Rangers (Wind Morphers/Wind Rangers); Hunter & Blake were called the Thunder Rangers (Thunder Morphers/Thunder Rangers); and Cam the (Green) Samurai Ranger (Samurai Morpher/Samurai Ranger). The names go by the respective power source/morpher, not by the fact that they have dino powers. Sonic_Shadow 00:08 July 21, 2006 (UTC)
That's what I'm trying to tell you, Ryulong; some sources have not updated the facts. The morphers on Power Rangers: Dino Thunder are named after their respective dinosaur: Tyranno Morpher (Conner/Red Tyranno Ranger), Ptera Morpher (Kira/Yellow Ptera Ranger), Tricera Morpher (Ethan/Blue Tricera Ranger), Brachio Morpher (Tommy/Black Brachio Ranger) and Drago Morpher (Trent/White Drago Ranger). They've even been called so on the show... in several episodes, I might add! So, please, rely on the show itself... not these so-called "sources". Sonic_Shadow 00:19 July 21, 2006 (UTC)
So will I... let's update, Ryulong... Sonic_Shadow 00:21 July 21, 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Please remember that a minor edit is a spelling or grammar change, or punctuation correcting. If you change part of the article content - as you've done, it should really be marked as a normal edit. Thanks. HawkerTyphoon 01:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
And then there are the additional users I've listed. Is there anyway to go onto IRC and get someone to checkuser? Ryūlóng 00:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mike. Not sure why my new request skipped past your request. Perhaps the case is more complex and they are still analysing the dat? Mine only involved Anwar and two IPs. Thanks, Blnguyen | rant-line 01:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Ryulong fyi, my response from Blnguyen. OSU80 01:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I have been trying to move Mystic Force Rangers to Mystic Force Power Rangers. After a week on the talk page, I went to check the Requested Moves page and it has been removed and not placed in the backlog. Should I chalk this up to the move being in process, or has it been ignored and should I go through another Requested Move process, or be bold? Ryūlóng 21:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry I rarely use IRC and don't have any special admin rights on any of the channels. I'm sorry we've pushed Nookdog out to there. I'm not sure who owns the IRC channels, you may need to track them down. Gwernol 01:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong. Please note that your recent request for investigation concerning Mjc0961 has been processed. The administrator commented "Archived; no edits since 24-hour block". Thank you. // [ admin] Pathoschild ( talk/ map) 04:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
How was this edit reverting vandalism.... you removed a celebrity infobox.... I don't understand. gren グレン 10:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey I created a new page called Enhancement Modes in Power Rangers. I was wondering if you would contribute your knowledge to this page. Thanks, -- Unclerico89 03:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, just answering your question, in Thai Wikipedia the picture's claimed as a fair-use image in the category of manga/anime picture. -- Manop - TH 08:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
What is the reason to that? --Comanche cph 10:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
On the chop block once again.... OSU80 15:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
You unblocked RumDuck ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)'s IP address which had been recently used by Werto ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). The commonality might not be coincidental [4]. Phr ( talk) 04:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
If you read my post in thad discussion, you´ll see I´m sincere. That was a smart way do add everyone who deserves to be there and still keep them apart from the ones who are really considered Rangers by the fans. DinobotTM2 05:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I Know. And never mind...
P.S.: Now i need to talk someone into writing an article about the Psycho Rangers, hehehe... ;) DinobotTM2 05:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I´ve seen. Still, they´re far more important to just be in a generic "Villains of" article. They were the most dangerous Evil Rangers, plaged through 2 different series and caused the death of a Ranger (what none ever did before). But that is just my thought. DinobotTM2 05:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Maybe later. I´d rather talk about it in a discusion page before doing it. DinobotTM2 05:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have moved the discussion from WP:AIV to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gary Frill. Please report there any more evidence you can find. Thanks. Mushroom ( Talk) 13:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Autism.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "image name has nothing to do with subject". However, "image name has nothing to do with subject" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:IFD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle ( talk) 15:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Did they do the checkuser thing on User:Bluecanoe? What's new with all that. It looks like nothing else has happened. -- Awiseman 18:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the various Power Rangers characters from this category because their method of teleportation can be likened to the Star Trek teleporters. They did not have the power to do so; they merely used technology to do so. If you take any random Star Trek character, you can see that they are not listed under "Fictional teleporters". Ryūlóng 18:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Why are you reverting the removal of AD as vandalism? That's a content dispute. KillerChihuahua ?!? 01:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
To return to the matter:
This should be interpreted (as far as I know) as "never use AD/CE, but when writing intervals".
Now look at my edit at Mark 12, [5]. Apart a matter of formatting I do not understand why you reverted (the center tag), my edit was changing "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of AD April 7, 30 or April 3, 33" to "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of April 7, 30 or April 3, 33". I do not understand why this edit is wrong or, by your words, vandalism.-- Brunetti 20:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
"At WP:DATE, there is nothing under years that states that AD should not be used when it is the only era in an article."
Well, to give you some peace & quiet Ryulong, I blocked one range at Infostrada for an hour. I'll have to document this at WP:AN/I, but if no one else using that ISP is inconvenienced (who knows, maybe none of them actually want to edit the English Wikipedia), we can keep extending the block until he goes away. -- llywrch 23:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You cry I am stalikg you, yet you don't answer me and, worse, revert my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.77.48 ( talk • contribs)
You think I am making a point? All of this time and you still did not understand anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.87.229 ( talk • contribs)
You are way over 3RR on the
Noah's Ark article, in fact you are at 9RR. You are only permitted 3 reverts (see
WP:3RR) on an article in a 24 hour period. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing for a period of time. Additionally, you engaged in edit-warring with an anon, this too is a blockable offense.
Bottom line, I understand your frustration (and I think I know why that change irked you), but is it really important enough to risk getting blocked over? Sometimes with anons it's best to ignore them -- they usually lose interest and go away. Cheers.
PS -- I didn't leave a note for the anon because he hasn't a reserved IP -- he's editing via IUNET-BNET in Italy, and if the range is blocked, other users suffer. Just hang in there.
•Jim62sch•
11:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you're pretty determined to move Czech player articles to titles that have diacritics, I would like to point you to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey#page_moves and Talk:Marián Gáborík to explain why people are undoing those moves. -- NeoChaosX 01:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For cleaning up the vandal on my talk page! I appreciate it. All the best, Ziggurat 01:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverting an anons edits regarding the removal of AD. The wikipedia guideline states that AD/CE is only necessary when used in a range of dates that begin in BC/BCE. While you may not like the current guideline, and there can be discussion to change that, I urge you to respect the standing guidelines and not revert such edits in the future. I personally dislike edit wars having to do with dates (especially AD vs. CE issues). I wish there were a way for each user to be able to choose which format appears on their computer, but until that date, I feel removing the redundent ADs and CEs (per the guidelines) helps nip these issues in the bud. (the AD/CEs are redundent because any wikilinked positive number goes to the year article such as 5, or 226, or 2006, etc)-- Andrew c 02:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Try Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde (2nd) ፈቃደ ( ውይይት) 02:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted an edit on Montanism which was duly discussed on its talk page, saying only "rvv". Please check the Talk page in the future before assuming an edit like that is vandalism. I'm reverting your revert. Thanks. Fagstein 05:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I blocked the user for three and a half hours. If you have any questions or comments, please post to my talk page. Happy to be of service, RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 06:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I guessed that... eventually. Cheers ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! This guy is giving me a headache! -- Ptkfgs 03:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reverting my user page. However, 66.169.178.110 is my IP, and I had merely forgotten to log in before beginning to edit. Thanks for the help, but just to let you know, it's me. ;)
-- Scorpion 03:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I happen to feel that the list of pokemon at the top of the page is counter intuitive becasue you read the whole article and want to look for more information. In addition... I'm not sure about you , but I find that particular information almost illegible at the top of the page. In additon, several other articles have succession information repeated at the top info box and at the bottom succession box such as the articles on the US Presidents and the Queen of the United Kingdom. Blong 12:26, 28 July 2006 (EDT)
Hey, I justed wanted to know why you deleted the cartoon I put up, It is a good example of a RoadKill Bill script. -- ForbiddenCheeseburgerofDoom 07:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Xyzzyplugh left you a message (click here to see it) on my talk page possibly accidental.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 16:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Basically the image is copyrighted, but according to the law of the USA you have fair rights to use the image as a method to identify the cartoon with. User:Billybobmac
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FosterMe ( talk • contribs)
Good day!
I saw that you considered an edit by an unregistered user a minor vandalism in your edit summary while reverting it. I would like to remind you that any good-faith effort to improve the Wikipedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism (see WP:VAND) and (WP:AGF). Good faith should always be assumed and I think that calling that vandalism was not necessary, since the user was only changing a singular verb to a plural one.
With best regards, Introgressive 22:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Why are you reverting the removal of AD as vandalism? That's a content dispute. KillerChihuahua ?!? 01:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
To return to the matter:
This should be interpreted (as far as I know) as "never use AD/CE, but when writing intervals".
Now look at my edit at Mark 12, [6]. Apart a matter of formatting I do not understand why you reverted (the center tag), my edit was changing "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of AD April 7, 30 or April 3, 33" to "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of April 7, 30 or April 3, 33". I do not understand why this edit is wrong or, by your words, vandalism.-- Brunetti 20:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
"At WP:DATE, there is nothing under years that states that AD should not be used when it is the only era in an article."
Well, to give you some peace & quiet Ryulong, I blocked one range at Infostrada for an hour. I'll have to document this at WP:AN/I, but if no one else using that ISP is inconvenienced (who knows, maybe none of them actually want to edit the English Wikipedia), we can keep extending the block until he goes away. -- llywrch 23:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You cry I am stalikg you, yet you don't answer me and, worse, revert my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.77.48 ( talk • contribs)
You think I am making a point? All of this time and you still did not understand anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.87.229 ( talk • contribs)
You are way over 3RR on the
Noah's Ark article, in fact you are at 9RR. You are only permitted 3 reverts (see
WP:3RR) on an article in a 24 hour period. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing for a period of time. Additionally, you engaged in edit-warring with an anon, this too is a blockable offense.
Bottom line, I understand your frustration (and I think I know why that change irked you), but is it really important enough to risk getting blocked over? Sometimes with anons it's best to ignore them -- they usually lose interest and go away. Cheers.
PS -- I didn't leave a note for the anon because he hasn't a reserved IP -- he's editing via IUNET-BNET in Italy, and if the range is blocked, other users suffer. Just hang in there.
•Jim62sch•
11:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you're pretty determined to move Czech player articles to titles that have diacritics, I would like to point you to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey#page_moves and Talk:Marián Gáborík to explain why people are undoing those moves. -- NeoChaosX 01:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For cleaning up the vandal on my talk page! I appreciate it. All the best, Ziggurat 01:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverting an anons edits regarding the removal of AD. The wikipedia guideline states that AD/CE is only necessary when used in a range of dates that begin in BC/BCE. While you may not like the current guideline, and there can be discussion to change that, I urge you to respect the standing guidelines and not revert such edits in the future. I personally dislike edit wars having to do with dates (especially AD vs. CE issues). I wish there were a way for each user to be able to choose which format appears on their computer, but until that date, I feel removing the redundent ADs and CEs (per the guidelines) helps nip these issues in the bud. (the AD/CEs are redundent because any wikilinked positive number goes to the year article such as 5, or 226, or 2006, etc)-- Andrew c 02:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Try Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde (2nd) ፈቃደ ( ውይይት) 02:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted an edit on Montanism which was duly discussed on its talk page, saying only "rvv". Please check the Talk page in the future before assuming an edit like that is vandalism. I'm reverting your revert. Thanks. Fagstein 05:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I blocked the user for three and a half hours. If you have any questions or comments, please post to my talk page. Happy to be of service, RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 06:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I guessed that... eventually. Cheers ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! This guy is giving me a headache! -- Ptkfgs 03:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reverting my user page. However, 66.169.178.110 is my IP, and I had merely forgotten to log in before beginning to edit. Thanks for the help, but just to let you know, it's me. ;)
-- Scorpion 03:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I happen to feel that the list of pokemon at the top of the page is counter intuitive becasue you read the whole article and want to look for more information. In addition... I'm not sure about you , but I find that particular information almost illegible at the top of the page. In additon, several other articles have succession information repeated at the top info box and at the bottom succession box such as the articles on the US Presidents and the Queen of the United Kingdom. Blong 12:26, 28 July 2006 (EDT)
Hey, I justed wanted to know why you deleted the cartoon I put up, It is a good example of a RoadKill Bill script. -- ForbiddenCheeseburgerofDoom 07:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Xyzzyplugh left you a message (click here to see it) on my talk page possibly accidental.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 16:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Basically the image is copyrighted, but according to the law of the USA you have fair rights to use the image as a method to identify the cartoon with. User:Billybobmac
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FosterMe ( talk • contribs)
Good day!
I saw that you considered an edit by an unregistered user a minor vandalism in your edit summary while reverting it. I would like to remind you that any good-faith effort to improve the Wikipedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism (see WP:VAND) and (WP:AGF). Good faith should always be assumed and I think that calling that vandalism was not necessary, since the user was only changing a singular verb to a plural one.
With best regards, Introgressive 22:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Insane Clown Posse. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. αChimp laudare 03:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I'll stop if I know Kasreyn won't be able to pigeon hold the ICP page(s) anymore.
You have been blocked for 24 hours for a 3RR violation on Insane Clown Posse. Please do not edit war. -- Cyde↔Weys 03:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong.
I am redirecting the Savanna theory article to Bipedalism#Evolution because that aritcle has a more NPOV treatment of the topic, not a strawman written from an AAT POV. Thanks JPotter 07:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the reason made those edits is because a person made manuel page moves that lost the history of the original article. I'm going to submit a WP:RM to fix the article title properly because of the redirects created. Crumbsucker 10:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
It's have an article.Is an stub, but it's an article.See: Time After Time (1) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForumUser ( talk • contribs)
His obituary used "Frederick De Cordova" which is the name he used in all the movies he directed. But he used "Fred De Cordova" for TV work. It sounds like I have to move the article from Frederick to Fred and back(!!!) to get both names to direct to it. Edison 19:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'll try to be more careful but how do I know who to leave welcome messages to? How am I supposed to identify sockpuppets and things of that nature? -- Tu s pm( C | @) 21:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I just deleted the talk page and the article, and moved it to WIktionary , per discussion. Could you explain why you reverted it? According to Wiki instructions, I now need to delete the article, but do not know how. jawesq 21:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I do not really know anything about transwiking. I'll see if there's anything on WP. Ryūlóng 21:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
As there is currently no way of moving pages across wikis, the transfer must be done using cut and paste. If there is anything valuable on the talk page, this may be moved in the same way, though in many cases the talk may not be relevant to the wiki you are moving the article to. The original page may be deleted as soon as it has been moved to the transwiki area. You must enter in the log that the article has moved. The log can be found by going to transwiki which will be a redirect to the log page. The deletion log will also provide a record, and any transwiki article can be undeleted if the move was considered "out-of-process" or if someone requests undeletion (via Deletion review at en for example).
That is why I did what I did. jawesq 22:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering, are you planning on using your bot to move all those pages back to where they were? It would be much faster if you used your bot as it will take me a long time by hand. Oh, i am not talking about those 10 or 12 i moved shortly before i got blocked, i am talking about all the ones from before. Masterhatch 00:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for following him around a bit. He's a handful. — Bunchofgrapes ( talk) 02:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I am a little confused. you said that Wikipedia:Naming conventions (standard letters with diacritics) and the hockey one contradict each other. That is not so. Both are clear that if the most common form of that person's name in English uses diacritics, the diacritics are kept and if the most common from in English omits diacritics, diacritics are to be omitted. And as you say it should remain as is, why is the mass moving that you did to be kept and not the original article titles? What makes your moves so special? Masterhatch 05:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello there, Not to be forceful or anything but blood for blood are an important band and was very annoyed after you deleted it. they have a page at blood for blood however, I was updating the page and moving it to blood for blood (band) as it is a neater solution... I hope you can friendly discuss this futher in the future if you have any other problems. Thankyou, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaron J Nicoli ( talk • contribs)
I understand that it does... I am changing it to Blood for Blood (band) as it will seperate the article, and show that IT IS A BAND.
Ok, I have just adjusted the blood for blood main page... I did not understand the move option, now I do... Also, is it ok if we delete the blood for blood (band) article and then move the blood for blood article to the blood for blood (band) article that is exactly what i was hoping to achieve?
The entry for mindrot was a work in progress and they are a notable band. Their record label Relapse Records has an entry, and they released 3 albums on the label Forlorn Ep Released July 1995, Dawning Released October 1995, and Soul Released March 1998. -- Ambiguousfrerak 07:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I was not the original creator of the other entries. The band is notable and does deserve an entry on Wikipedia.-- Ambiguousfrerak 07:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The band Eyes of Fire currently have 2 former members from mindrot Matt Fisher and Dan Kaufman. Eyes of fire On 06-17-06 EYES OF FIRE's video for IT ALL DIES TODAY was BANG OF THE WEEK on HEADBANGERS BALL. Jamie Jasta spoke about the album, showed an image of the front cover and started the show with the video. that was the 3rd week in a row that EYES OF FIRE had been played on HEADBANGERS BALL. IT ALL DIES TODAY, was the #3 most requested Metal song on the MUSIC CHOICE NETWORK. Due to the requests the song was added into rotation on SIRIUS SATELITE "HARD ATTACK" station. The Obscurity of a band does not decide its notability, take Snot for instance. Influential to many bands but few mainstream people had even heard of them till a band like Sevendust does a song in tribute to the deceased lead singer. The notablilty of Mindrot also stems from the sucsess of it's members in other projects. -- Ambiguousfrerak 07:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
If the article is written "in an encyclopedic tone" will it be accepted? Mindrot is noteable and deserves an entry.-- Ambiguousfrerak 07:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Eyes of fire meet all these criteria for entry, therefore with 2 members from Mindrot they are noteable. -- Ambiguousfrerak 07:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I am a fan of Mindrot and feel that they deserve an entry, I only know about Eyes of Fire because of the 2 members from Mindrot. Since the band Eyes of Fire qualify for entry Mindrot should as well.-- Ambiguousfrerak 08:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Did you make a mistake here and revert a comment by mistake?
Just letting you know, that really looked like a valid comment to me. — Natha n ( talk) / 18:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
You seem to have a great record of dealing with vandals on Wikipedia, and I felt you should be recognized, so... The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I Chuchunezumi award Ryulong this barnstar for dilligence in patrolling spammmers and vandals. Chuchunezumi 20:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
When I delete my pages because I want out, can you stop your pompous self-important meddling in my affairs? I am not deleting other people's pages, but my own. You got a problem? Can't mind your own business? WikiSceptic 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, really? And why is that? If I want out of Wikipedia, I cannot? And, apparently, that also goes for my original pages created as subsidiaries to my talk page? Wow, this is fantastic! Has Hitler come back to life? Or is it Stalin? WikiSceptic 05:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I have had enough of the criminal insolence and arrogance of you lot. Nguyen was not the first, and you will certainly not be the last. It is my right to remove my personal pages, and in preventing that, you tresspass on my rights. This, in civil law; I do not care for Wikipedia's internal rules. I not only want out of Wikipedia, I also want my personal pages out, and that is my right. I am not asking for any charity or privileges but to mind my own business. Please stop meddling in my affairs - although, from my long experience, I know that you will not cease your present outrageous encroachments on my rights. WikiSceptic 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I can recognize criminal insolence when I see it. WikiSceptic 05:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi there- see you are fighting the vandalism on Totse and have added it to the admin list. Since the attacks are coming from multiple sources, do you think it's possible to get a semi protect on it? I'm not sure if the requirements are there. Thanks! -- Cabiria 06:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
kindly mind your speech when addressing. I am not a vandal. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.116.229 ( talk • contribs)
You and Kchase02 appear to have zapped the vandal that was going after my userpage... and I didn't even realize it until I was looking at the edit history! Thanks for doing the reverts while I wasn't online. Dark Shikari 18:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey, sorry, I was editing The Violent Bear It Away article and accidently deleted a bunch of it. I realized right after I did it that it would look a lot like vandalism, and wasn't sure how to revert it. Sorry about the mix-up! Caesar 21:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
User Lkadvani is vandalizing talk page of 2002 Gujarat Violence with baseless allegations and slander of myself. He is quoting from sites off wikipedia that have no bearing on myself or anyone here. That is why I deleted it. I hhave warned him twice and, if he reverts a third time, I will report vandalism. Please understand. Thank you. Netaji 22:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I'm not too adept at the Wiki coding yet, so I apologize if I mess up your page here. I noticed that you removed the external links on the "Pokemon Red and Blue" article, and you noted that they smell like spam. Well, I added the first link, which was to the IGN Guide (< http://guides.ign.com/guides/16708/index.html>). I don't know about the other link, but that link was not spam. I have no affiliation to the IGN company, although I do use their guide often as a reference while playing the game, which is the exact reason I added that link. I'm not an expert on Wiki rules yet, but I think that link was valid and that other players could benefit from it. Would you just explain your reasoning some more?
P.S. I noticed that you study biology. I, too, like biology. Just read 'Parasite Rex' by Carl Zimmer and 'Wonderful Life' by Stephen J. Gould. I highly recommend both if you haven't read them. Maybe we could chat some more... Talk to you soon.
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your recent edit to Puffkins ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 05:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
I was in the process of doing so, check the reason for why I did Zero X Marquis 01:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, my mistake, thanks for giving a clear reference...l8r. -CaptainJade9
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. abakharev 07:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
This appears to be a content dispute, not vandalism. I'm going to ask everyone involved to read WP:V: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth." Unsourced data can be removed at any time by any editor. Thanks. :) RadioKirk ( u| t| c) 07:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Can you please remember to sort out your differences with other editors using the discussion page rather than getting into an edit war. (Same message left at other talk pages) -- Fr a ncs2000 File:Flag of Buckinghamshire.png 09:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. abakharev 07:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
This is megasean3000, telling you that i was wrong about Silk Spinner and that it's Silk Spitter, and for those mistakes, i apoligize. If that's okay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megasean3000 ( talk • contribs)
The AfD tag was removed because the original creator of the tag tagged the article due to bias against the user. However if the tag was replaced by a non-bias user the tag will not be removed. The initial AfD was vandalism, therefore I was inclined to remove it. However, now it will not be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.248.218.111 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, it's megasean3000 again, if you don't mind can you show me how to upload images onto wikapedia. If you don't mind. Because i have some interesting images of Xiaolin Showdown ready to upload. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megasean3000 ( talk • contribs)
Yes, there is a policy forbidding exactly this; see here. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar 08:14, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about any confusion I may have caused with my little rant. The meatpuppet accusations are just a major sore spot with me -- they're completely false, but I have no way to actually prove it. - TPIRFanSteve 05:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Ive Got a Better picture of Kimiko in my pictures, how do I get it on there?— Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
sorry for having the truth bud,I hope I dident offend you or make you think for a second. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelsmades6 ( talk • contribs)
E-mail me and i will destroy you with words joelsmades6@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelsmades6 ( talk • contribs)
why are you so afraid — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelsmades6 ( talk • contribs)
I added specials to List of Super Sentai episodes, from the articles of both Sentai series. July 7, 2006 15:09 Philippine time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.213.94.83 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry for accidentally reverting your change to Kyouryuu Sentai ZyuRanger re: Zyu2 while reverting the episode list blanking. It was not my intent. jgp ( T| C) 07:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
I tried to add categories to two Userboxes I created, {{ User City of Heroes}} and {{ User City of Villains}}. I can see that the categories are listed on my user page, but when I check the category (at least for the City of Heroes one) it only lists one user, and no others. What did I do wrong? Ryulong 08:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
How exactly do I make a dummy edit? The help page isn't that clear. Ryulong 07:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
I recently listed the article Kyoryuu Sentai ZyuRanger 2 for deletion because of copyvio and the lack of notability due to a much more well written section on the subject of the article placed on another related article ( Mighty Morphin Power Rangers). This afternoon, I found that another article, this one entitled Zyu2 (which is the more widely accepted term for the content in the first article) was linked to the section of the Power Rangers article, and I put an AfD on it and added it to the currently ongoing AfD for the first article. It was essentially a copy and paste of the section about Zyu2 in the Power Rangers article, and I'm wondering if this was the right thing to do. I don't know if I should have instead listed it for speedy deletion, or perhaps made it a redirect to the currently AfD'd "Kyoryuu Sentai ZyuRanger 2". For the more established editors, what should I do? Ryulong 19:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Um, why we're my changes problematic? That page was not organized correctly. Catastros did not need to be a heading, it should either be put in a new scetion, or be a bold title to go along with the mention of all other megazords. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.108.15 ( talk • contribs)
It from devient art. a website that has fanart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
Yes that was I was talking about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for putting the copyright on it, pal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SerpentsTail ( talk • contribs)
Hey about those edits to Tommy Oliver, I didn't realize that they divide the section so that you could edit single season. I appreciate you sending me a message though and getting it out of the way, otherwise, we would just be deleting each other's work for no reason. I am an avid Power Rangers fan and am looking forward to making the Power Rangers section the best it can be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclerico89 ( talk • contribs)
{{ Power Rangers Characters}} Yea no problem. Hey I have a question. I have no idea how to edit the above box. Can you tell me? Thanks for the help.-- Unclerico89 03:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, I wish to add more characters to it, namely Kira Ford and Ethan James. I am a huge Dino Thunder fan and am currently expanding their files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclerico89 ( talk • contribs)
Oh, I get it now. Thanks a lot, man. Hey one last thing, how come whenever I go to change the picture of Tommy Oliver (the one in his infobox), the image won't show.-- [User:Unclerico89|Unclerico89]] 04:02, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I wanted to put a Dino Thunder pic of Tommy in to make it more up to date. The pic is Tommy89.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclerico89 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry I don't have any photos of Sebastian, but I'll keep my eye out. Only one I've seen is the more a drawing than a photo, and I think you included that on the page (which, by the way, is quite good!). MiamiDolphins3 23:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
So, what's up with the new blocking stuff that's mentioned on WP:AN that people are thinking of permablocking all of unregistered AOL editors? Ryulong 01:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Heh--I was just adding a sockpuppet/meatpuppet warning about 202.163.208.50 when you made your edit to WP:AIV mentioning his presence, but I got caught by the edit conflict. How's that for coincidence? jgp ( T| C) 05:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
I was browsing around a category and found some pages that didn't seem notable: Power Rangers Theme Tune, V-Lancer, and The Best of the Power Rangers: The Ultimate Rangers. I listed these pages for deletion, with "Power Rangers Theme Tune" as the main article that the others were listed under as a multiple AfD. Where I originally found the first article about a random single non-notable, it was revealed through the AfD discussion that this single hit #3 on the UK Singles charts and passes WP:MUSIC and is notable. I rescinded my delete for that article, but I now feel that the two articles I listed with it may also be considered as part of the Keep reasons as they are now unrelated to the header article. I attempted to relist the articles as {{ db-context}} but they were subsequently removed because I have them still listed as AfD for the Theme Tune article. I do not know what to do now. Remove the other two articles from the AfD and relist them as db-context, start an entirely new AfD for them, or do nothing. Ryulong 01:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't do much good to respond here and then immediately archive. :) Anyway, the ...but... comment was paraphrased from User:Dawson's suggestion on the irc channel #wikipedia-bootcamp. I think what you did was fine. — WAvegetarian• (talk) 03:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah I looked at that note and your submission awhile ago and I just found that Ninja Sentai Kakuranger has descriptions in their mecha page and possibly in some of their character description page which I traced back to that same user have descriptions from a former Sentai page that is no longer active called Skull Corps which I reconize since I used to travel to when I started on gathering data on Super Sentai, the descriptions can also be found and that the summary was posted last April. - Adv193 01:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
ok. SerpentsTail
I do not see any real vandalism in the contributions of the 202....IP's you reported, only changes which could be made in good faith (see here). Have you tried talking to the user(s) who are making the changes?. Cheers. Lectonar 07:22, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for putting the sock puppet thing on Bluecanoe, I forgot. Also, what's the tag for the American English userbox, I'd like to put that on mine? Thanks. -- Awiseman 20:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my entry in the Articles for Deletion log. I should have previewed. ... discospinster talk 02:16, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
I know that vandals generally don't revert, but is there a way that recent vandalism to my User page be removed completely from its history? I really don't need the threat of the anus image back through an asshole's (no pun intended) reversions. Ryulong 07:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
If you don't mind losing the earlier record of edit's I'd be fine to delete your userpage and restore only the last good version, though this would make some of your edits counts as deleted edits (which might bother some). -- Alf melmac 07:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Nice job, Junior. Ninja Storm Power Rangers looks good. You really showed dedication and follow-through. ACS (Wikipedian) 07:39, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi not sure if you are aware but:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in 4chan. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.
Others are watching the page for vandalism Regards-- A Y Arktos\ talk 23:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I have placed this article under Wikipedia:Deletion review if you would like to be involved. Thanks! OSU80 02:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
This is Tyler111, how do you archive things. Thanks for the info if you can help. Tyler111
Looks like another sockpuppet. I reverted this puppet's edits to Joseph Patrick Moore. And to think they are going to actually keep the article around when obvious puppets are attempting to advertise. blah! OSU80 00:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
User's behavior is not simple vandalism. Try to talk to the user or bring it up on WP:ANI not WP:AIV. Thanks. JoshuaZ 02:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
smells like a wet sock(puppet) to me. Shows up on Wiki today (7/18), makes a lot of trivial edits to articles about various notable bassists, and then spams Joseph Patrick Moore with a ton o' links. Oh, and on the talk page, he claims that Moore was "endorsed by the Weather Channel". [2]
What think you?
-- EngineerScotty 05:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah it's funny how they've already ran the check user for user:Blnguyen here but have yet to give yours attention which was posted the day before his. I've been given the impression on IRC that they play favorites there. There aren't even any clerk notes yet. OSU80 00:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my WP:AIV report. [3] I need to report that as a bug. -- Gogo Dodo 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
You know what happens when vandals can't get a rise out of you anymore...? ..they get bored, and realize it's more productive to fix things, rather than break them-- AOL account (205.188.116.200) 00:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
If you happen to actually look at the show, you will find out that they were called by their dinosaur name: Red Tyranno, Yellow Ptera, Blue Tricera, Black Brachio & White Drago - not Red Dino, Blue Dino, etc. Please check your facts, Ryulong, and get off my back about this... Sonic_Shadow 11:16 July 20, 2006 (UTC)
Well, the website is wrong... take for example Power Rangers: Ninja Storm; Shane, Dustin & Tori were called the Wind Rangers (Wind Morphers/Wind Rangers); Hunter & Blake were called the Thunder Rangers (Thunder Morphers/Thunder Rangers); and Cam the (Green) Samurai Ranger (Samurai Morpher/Samurai Ranger). The names go by the respective power source/morpher, not by the fact that they have dino powers. Sonic_Shadow 00:08 July 21, 2006 (UTC)
That's what I'm trying to tell you, Ryulong; some sources have not updated the facts. The morphers on Power Rangers: Dino Thunder are named after their respective dinosaur: Tyranno Morpher (Conner/Red Tyranno Ranger), Ptera Morpher (Kira/Yellow Ptera Ranger), Tricera Morpher (Ethan/Blue Tricera Ranger), Brachio Morpher (Tommy/Black Brachio Ranger) and Drago Morpher (Trent/White Drago Ranger). They've even been called so on the show... in several episodes, I might add! So, please, rely on the show itself... not these so-called "sources". Sonic_Shadow 00:19 July 21, 2006 (UTC)
So will I... let's update, Ryulong... Sonic_Shadow 00:21 July 21, 2006 (UTC)
Hi! Please remember that a minor edit is a spelling or grammar change, or punctuation correcting. If you change part of the article content - as you've done, it should really be marked as a normal edit. Thanks. HawkerTyphoon 01:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
And then there are the additional users I've listed. Is there anyway to go onto IRC and get someone to checkuser? Ryūlóng 00:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mike. Not sure why my new request skipped past your request. Perhaps the case is more complex and they are still analysing the dat? Mine only involved Anwar and two IPs. Thanks, Blnguyen | rant-line 01:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Ryulong fyi, my response from Blnguyen. OSU80 01:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I have been trying to move Mystic Force Rangers to Mystic Force Power Rangers. After a week on the talk page, I went to check the Requested Moves page and it has been removed and not placed in the backlog. Should I chalk this up to the move being in process, or has it been ignored and should I go through another Requested Move process, or be bold? Ryūlóng 21:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry I rarely use IRC and don't have any special admin rights on any of the channels. I'm sorry we've pushed Nookdog out to there. I'm not sure who owns the IRC channels, you may need to track them down. Gwernol 01:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ryulong. Please note that your recent request for investigation concerning Mjc0961 has been processed. The administrator commented "Archived; no edits since 24-hour block". Thank you. // [ admin] Pathoschild ( talk/ map) 04:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
How was this edit reverting vandalism.... you removed a celebrity infobox.... I don't understand. gren グレン 10:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey I created a new page called Enhancement Modes in Power Rangers. I was wondering if you would contribute your knowledge to this page. Thanks, -- Unclerico89 03:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, just answering your question, in Thai Wikipedia the picture's claimed as a fair-use image in the category of manga/anime picture. -- Manop - TH 08:03, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
What is the reason to that? --Comanche cph 10:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
On the chop block once again.... OSU80 15:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
You unblocked RumDuck ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)'s IP address which had been recently used by Werto ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). The commonality might not be coincidental [4]. Phr ( talk) 04:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
If you read my post in thad discussion, you´ll see I´m sincere. That was a smart way do add everyone who deserves to be there and still keep them apart from the ones who are really considered Rangers by the fans. DinobotTM2 05:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I Know. And never mind...
P.S.: Now i need to talk someone into writing an article about the Psycho Rangers, hehehe... ;) DinobotTM2 05:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I´ve seen. Still, they´re far more important to just be in a generic "Villains of" article. They were the most dangerous Evil Rangers, plaged through 2 different series and caused the death of a Ranger (what none ever did before). But that is just my thought. DinobotTM2 05:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Maybe later. I´d rather talk about it in a discusion page before doing it. DinobotTM2 05:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I have moved the discussion from WP:AIV to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gary Frill. Please report there any more evidence you can find. Thanks. Mushroom ( Talk) 13:28, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you tagged the page Image:Autism.jpg for speedy deletion with the reason "image name has nothing to do with subject". However, "image name has nothing to do with subject" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:IFD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle ( talk) 15:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Did they do the checkuser thing on User:Bluecanoe? What's new with all that. It looks like nothing else has happened. -- Awiseman 18:15, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the various Power Rangers characters from this category because their method of teleportation can be likened to the Star Trek teleporters. They did not have the power to do so; they merely used technology to do so. If you take any random Star Trek character, you can see that they are not listed under "Fictional teleporters". Ryūlóng 18:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Why are you reverting the removal of AD as vandalism? That's a content dispute. KillerChihuahua ?!? 01:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
To return to the matter:
This should be interpreted (as far as I know) as "never use AD/CE, but when writing intervals".
Now look at my edit at Mark 12, [5]. Apart a matter of formatting I do not understand why you reverted (the center tag), my edit was changing "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of AD April 7, 30 or April 3, 33" to "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of April 7, 30 or April 3, 33". I do not understand why this edit is wrong or, by your words, vandalism.-- Brunetti 20:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
"At WP:DATE, there is nothing under years that states that AD should not be used when it is the only era in an article."
Well, to give you some peace & quiet Ryulong, I blocked one range at Infostrada for an hour. I'll have to document this at WP:AN/I, but if no one else using that ISP is inconvenienced (who knows, maybe none of them actually want to edit the English Wikipedia), we can keep extending the block until he goes away. -- llywrch 23:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You cry I am stalikg you, yet you don't answer me and, worse, revert my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.77.48 ( talk • contribs)
You think I am making a point? All of this time and you still did not understand anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.87.229 ( talk • contribs)
You are way over 3RR on the
Noah's Ark article, in fact you are at 9RR. You are only permitted 3 reverts (see
WP:3RR) on an article in a 24 hour period. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing for a period of time. Additionally, you engaged in edit-warring with an anon, this too is a blockable offense.
Bottom line, I understand your frustration (and I think I know why that change irked you), but is it really important enough to risk getting blocked over? Sometimes with anons it's best to ignore them -- they usually lose interest and go away. Cheers.
PS -- I didn't leave a note for the anon because he hasn't a reserved IP -- he's editing via IUNET-BNET in Italy, and if the range is blocked, other users suffer. Just hang in there.
•Jim62sch•
11:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you're pretty determined to move Czech player articles to titles that have diacritics, I would like to point you to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey#page_moves and Talk:Marián Gáborík to explain why people are undoing those moves. -- NeoChaosX 01:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For cleaning up the vandal on my talk page! I appreciate it. All the best, Ziggurat 01:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverting an anons edits regarding the removal of AD. The wikipedia guideline states that AD/CE is only necessary when used in a range of dates that begin in BC/BCE. While you may not like the current guideline, and there can be discussion to change that, I urge you to respect the standing guidelines and not revert such edits in the future. I personally dislike edit wars having to do with dates (especially AD vs. CE issues). I wish there were a way for each user to be able to choose which format appears on their computer, but until that date, I feel removing the redundent ADs and CEs (per the guidelines) helps nip these issues in the bud. (the AD/CEs are redundent because any wikilinked positive number goes to the year article such as 5, or 226, or 2006, etc)-- Andrew c 02:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Try Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde (2nd) ፈቃደ ( ውይይት) 02:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted an edit on Montanism which was duly discussed on its talk page, saying only "rvv". Please check the Talk page in the future before assuming an edit like that is vandalism. I'm reverting your revert. Thanks. Fagstein 05:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I blocked the user for three and a half hours. If you have any questions or comments, please post to my talk page. Happy to be of service, RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 06:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I guessed that... eventually. Cheers ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! This guy is giving me a headache! -- Ptkfgs 03:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reverting my user page. However, 66.169.178.110 is my IP, and I had merely forgotten to log in before beginning to edit. Thanks for the help, but just to let you know, it's me. ;)
-- Scorpion 03:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I happen to feel that the list of pokemon at the top of the page is counter intuitive becasue you read the whole article and want to look for more information. In addition... I'm not sure about you , but I find that particular information almost illegible at the top of the page. In additon, several other articles have succession information repeated at the top info box and at the bottom succession box such as the articles on the US Presidents and the Queen of the United Kingdom. Blong 12:26, 28 July 2006 (EDT)
Hey, I justed wanted to know why you deleted the cartoon I put up, It is a good example of a RoadKill Bill script. -- ForbiddenCheeseburgerofDoom 07:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Xyzzyplugh left you a message (click here to see it) on my talk page possibly accidental.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 16:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Basically the image is copyrighted, but according to the law of the USA you have fair rights to use the image as a method to identify the cartoon with. User:Billybobmac
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FosterMe ( talk • contribs)
Good day!
I saw that you considered an edit by an unregistered user a minor vandalism in your edit summary while reverting it. I would like to remind you that any good-faith effort to improve the Wikipedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism (see WP:VAND) and (WP:AGF). Good faith should always be assumed and I think that calling that vandalism was not necessary, since the user was only changing a singular verb to a plural one.
With best regards, Introgressive 22:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Why are you reverting the removal of AD as vandalism? That's a content dispute. KillerChihuahua ?!? 01:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
To return to the matter:
This should be interpreted (as far as I know) as "never use AD/CE, but when writing intervals".
Now look at my edit at Mark 12, [6]. Apart a matter of formatting I do not understand why you reverted (the center tag), my edit was changing "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of AD April 7, 30 or April 3, 33" to "If one accepts [...] dates for Jesus' death of April 7, 30 or April 3, 33". I do not understand why this edit is wrong or, by your words, vandalism.-- Brunetti 20:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
"At WP:DATE, there is nothing under years that states that AD should not be used when it is the only era in an article."
Well, to give you some peace & quiet Ryulong, I blocked one range at Infostrada for an hour. I'll have to document this at WP:AN/I, but if no one else using that ISP is inconvenienced (who knows, maybe none of them actually want to edit the English Wikipedia), we can keep extending the block until he goes away. -- llywrch 23:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
You cry I am stalikg you, yet you don't answer me and, worse, revert my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.77.48 ( talk • contribs)
You think I am making a point? All of this time and you still did not understand anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.87.229 ( talk • contribs)
You are way over 3RR on the
Noah's Ark article, in fact you are at 9RR. You are only permitted 3 reverts (see
WP:3RR) on an article in a 24 hour period. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing for a period of time. Additionally, you engaged in edit-warring with an anon, this too is a blockable offense.
Bottom line, I understand your frustration (and I think I know why that change irked you), but is it really important enough to risk getting blocked over? Sometimes with anons it's best to ignore them -- they usually lose interest and go away. Cheers.
PS -- I didn't leave a note for the anon because he hasn't a reserved IP -- he's editing via IUNET-BNET in Italy, and if the range is blocked, other users suffer. Just hang in there.
•Jim62sch•
11:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Since you're pretty determined to move Czech player articles to titles that have diacritics, I would like to point you to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey#page_moves and Talk:Marián Gáborík to explain why people are undoing those moves. -- NeoChaosX 01:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For cleaning up the vandal on my talk page! I appreciate it. All the best, Ziggurat 01:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverting an anons edits regarding the removal of AD. The wikipedia guideline states that AD/CE is only necessary when used in a range of dates that begin in BC/BCE. While you may not like the current guideline, and there can be discussion to change that, I urge you to respect the standing guidelines and not revert such edits in the future. I personally dislike edit wars having to do with dates (especially AD vs. CE issues). I wish there were a way for each user to be able to choose which format appears on their computer, but until that date, I feel removing the redundent ADs and CEs (per the guidelines) helps nip these issues in the bud. (the AD/CEs are redundent because any wikilinked positive number goes to the year article such as 5, or 226, or 2006, etc)-- Andrew c 02:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Try Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Panairjdde (2nd) ፈቃደ ( ውይይት) 02:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted an edit on Montanism which was duly discussed on its talk page, saying only "rvv". Please check the Talk page in the future before assuming an edit like that is vandalism. I'm reverting your revert. Thanks. Fagstein 05:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
I blocked the user for three and a half hours. If you have any questions or comments, please post to my talk page. Happy to be of service, RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 06:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I guessed that... eventually. Cheers ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! This guy is giving me a headache! -- Ptkfgs 03:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reverting my user page. However, 66.169.178.110 is my IP, and I had merely forgotten to log in before beginning to edit. Thanks for the help, but just to let you know, it's me. ;)
-- Scorpion 03:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I happen to feel that the list of pokemon at the top of the page is counter intuitive becasue you read the whole article and want to look for more information. In addition... I'm not sure about you , but I find that particular information almost illegible at the top of the page. In additon, several other articles have succession information repeated at the top info box and at the bottom succession box such as the articles on the US Presidents and the Queen of the United Kingdom. Blong 12:26, 28 July 2006 (EDT)
Hey, I justed wanted to know why you deleted the cartoon I put up, It is a good example of a RoadKill Bill script. -- ForbiddenCheeseburgerofDoom 07:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Xyzzyplugh left you a message (click here to see it) on my talk page possibly accidental.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 16:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Basically the image is copyrighted, but according to the law of the USA you have fair rights to use the image as a method to identify the cartoon with. User:Billybobmac
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FosterMe ( talk • contribs)
Good day!
I saw that you considered an edit by an unregistered user a minor vandalism in your edit summary while reverting it. I would like to remind you that any good-faith effort to improve the Wikipedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism (see WP:VAND) and (WP:AGF). Good faith should always be assumed and I think that calling that vandalism was not necessary, since the user was only changing a singular verb to a plural one.
With best regards, Introgressive 22:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Insane Clown Posse. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. αChimp laudare 03:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I'll stop if I know Kasreyn won't be able to pigeon hold the ICP page(s) anymore.
You have been blocked for 24 hours for a 3RR violation on Insane Clown Posse. Please do not edit war. -- Cyde↔Weys 03:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong.
I am redirecting the Savanna theory article to Bipedalism#Evolution because that aritcle has a more NPOV treatment of the topic, not a strawman written from an AAT POV. Thanks JPotter 07:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi, the reason made those edits is because a person made manuel page moves that lost the history of the original article. I'm going to submit a WP:RM to fix the article title properly because of the redirects created. Crumbsucker 10:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
It's have an article.Is an stub, but it's an article.See: Time After Time (1) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ForumUser ( talk • contribs)
His obituary used "Frederick De Cordova" which is the name he used in all the movies he directed. But he used "Fred De Cordova" for TV work. It sounds like I have to move the article from Frederick to Fred and back(!!!) to get both names to direct to it. Edison 19:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I'll try to be more careful but how do I know who to leave welcome messages to? How am I supposed to identify sockpuppets and things of that nature? -- Tu s pm( C | @) 21:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I just deleted the talk page and the article, and moved it to WIktionary , per discussion. Could you explain why you reverted it? According to Wiki instructions, I now need to delete the article, but do not know how. jawesq 21:38, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I do not really know anything about transwiking. I'll see if there's anything on WP. Ryūlóng 21:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
As there is currently no way of moving pages across wikis, the transfer must be done using cut and paste. If there is anything valuable on the talk page, this may be moved in the same way, though in many cases the talk may not be relevant to the wiki you are moving the article to. The original page may be deleted as soon as it has been moved to the transwiki area. You must enter in the log that the article has moved. The log can be found by going to transwiki which will be a redirect to the log page. The deletion log will also provide a record, and any transwiki article can be undeleted if the move was considered "out-of-process" or if someone requests undeletion (via Deletion review at en for example).
That is why I did what I did. jawesq 22:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I was wondering, are you planning on using your bot to move all those pages back to where they were? It would be much faster if you used your bot as it will take me a long time by hand. Oh, i am not talking about those 10 or 12 i moved shortly before i got blocked, i am talking about all the ones from before. Masterhatch 00:45, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for following him around a bit. He's a handful. — Bunchofgrapes ( talk) 02:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I am a little confused. you said that Wikipedia:Naming conventions (standard letters with diacritics) and the hockey one contradict each other. That is not so. Both are clear that if the most common form of that person's name in English uses diacritics, the diacritics are kept and if the most common from in English omits diacritics, diacritics are to be omitted. And as you say it should remain as is, why is the mass moving that you did to be kept and not the original article titles? What makes your moves so special? Masterhatch 05:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello there, Not to be forceful or anything but blood for blood are an important band and was very annoyed after you deleted it. they have a page at blood for blood however, I was updating the page and moving it to blood for blood (band) as it is a neater solution... I hope you can friendly discuss this futher in the future if you have any other problems. Thankyou, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaron J Nicoli ( talk • contribs)
I understand that it does... I am changing it to Blood for Blood (band) as it will seperate the article, and show that IT IS A BAND.
Ok, I have just adjusted the blood for blood main page... I did not understand the move option, now I do... Also, is it ok if we delete the blood for blood (band) article and then move the blood for blood article to the blood for blood (band) article that is exactly what i was hoping to achieve?
The entry for mindrot was a work in progress and they are a notable band. Their record label Relapse Records has an entry, and they released 3 albums on the label Forlorn Ep Released July 1995, Dawning Released October 1995, and Soul Released March 1998. -- Ambiguousfrerak 07:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I was not the original creator of the other entries. The band is notable and does deserve an entry on Wikipedia.-- Ambiguousfrerak 07:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The band Eyes of Fire currently have 2 former members from mindrot Matt Fisher and Dan Kaufman. Eyes of fire On 06-17-06 EYES OF FIRE's video for IT ALL DIES TODAY was BANG OF THE WEEK on HEADBANGERS BALL. Jamie Jasta spoke about the album, showed an image of the front cover and started the show with the video. that was the 3rd week in a row that EYES OF FIRE had been played on HEADBANGERS BALL. IT ALL DIES TODAY, was the #3 most requested Metal song on the MUSIC CHOICE NETWORK. Due to the requests the song was added into rotation on SIRIUS SATELITE "HARD ATTACK" station. The Obscurity of a band does not decide its notability, take Snot for instance. Influential to many bands but few mainstream people had even heard of them till a band like Sevendust does a song in tribute to the deceased lead singer. The notablilty of Mindrot also stems from the sucsess of it's members in other projects. -- Ambiguousfrerak 07:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
If the article is written "in an encyclopedic tone" will it be accepted? Mindrot is noteable and deserves an entry.-- Ambiguousfrerak 07:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Eyes of fire meet all these criteria for entry, therefore with 2 members from Mindrot they are noteable. -- Ambiguousfrerak 07:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
I am a fan of Mindrot and feel that they deserve an entry, I only know about Eyes of Fire because of the 2 members from Mindrot. Since the band Eyes of Fire qualify for entry Mindrot should as well.-- Ambiguousfrerak 08:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Did you make a mistake here and revert a comment by mistake?
Just letting you know, that really looked like a valid comment to me. — Natha n ( talk) / 18:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
You seem to have a great record of dealing with vandals on Wikipedia, and I felt you should be recognized, so... The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I Chuchunezumi award Ryulong this barnstar for dilligence in patrolling spammmers and vandals. Chuchunezumi 20:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC) |
When I delete my pages because I want out, can you stop your pompous self-important meddling in my affairs? I am not deleting other people's pages, but my own. You got a problem? Can't mind your own business? WikiSceptic 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Oh, really? And why is that? If I want out of Wikipedia, I cannot? And, apparently, that also goes for my original pages created as subsidiaries to my talk page? Wow, this is fantastic! Has Hitler come back to life? Or is it Stalin? WikiSceptic 05:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I have had enough of the criminal insolence and arrogance of you lot. Nguyen was not the first, and you will certainly not be the last. It is my right to remove my personal pages, and in preventing that, you tresspass on my rights. This, in civil law; I do not care for Wikipedia's internal rules. I not only want out of Wikipedia, I also want my personal pages out, and that is my right. I am not asking for any charity or privileges but to mind my own business. Please stop meddling in my affairs - although, from my long experience, I know that you will not cease your present outrageous encroachments on my rights. WikiSceptic 05:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I can recognize criminal insolence when I see it. WikiSceptic 05:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi there- see you are fighting the vandalism on Totse and have added it to the admin list. Since the attacks are coming from multiple sources, do you think it's possible to get a semi protect on it? I'm not sure if the requirements are there. Thanks! -- Cabiria 06:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
kindly mind your speech when addressing. I am not a vandal. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.116.229 ( talk • contribs)
You and Kchase02 appear to have zapped the vandal that was going after my userpage... and I didn't even realize it until I was looking at the edit history! Thanks for doing the reverts while I wasn't online. Dark Shikari 18:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey, sorry, I was editing The Violent Bear It Away article and accidently deleted a bunch of it. I realized right after I did it that it would look a lot like vandalism, and wasn't sure how to revert it. Sorry about the mix-up! Caesar 21:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
User Lkadvani is vandalizing talk page of 2002 Gujarat Violence with baseless allegations and slander of myself. He is quoting from sites off wikipedia that have no bearing on myself or anyone here. That is why I deleted it. I hhave warned him twice and, if he reverts a third time, I will report vandalism. Please understand. Thank you. Netaji 22:48, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I'm not too adept at the Wiki coding yet, so I apologize if I mess up your page here. I noticed that you removed the external links on the "Pokemon Red and Blue" article, and you noted that they smell like spam. Well, I added the first link, which was to the IGN Guide (< http://guides.ign.com/guides/16708/index.html>). I don't know about the other link, but that link was not spam. I have no affiliation to the IGN company, although I do use their guide often as a reference while playing the game, which is the exact reason I added that link. I'm not an expert on Wiki rules yet, but I think that link was valid and that other players could benefit from it. Would you just explain your reasoning some more?
P.S. I noticed that you study biology. I, too, like biology. Just read 'Parasite Rex' by Carl Zimmer and 'Wonderful Life' by Stephen J. Gould. I highly recommend both if you haven't read them. Maybe we could chat some more... Talk to you soon.