This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | → | Archive 40 |
Removed text from the encyclopedia again in this article Ingush societies 1. And then the text began to change. Apparently, this provokes me on purpose. Although there the text was neutral Galashkinskoe naibstvo. Товболатов ( talk) 05:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Here too this member deleted the text Muqale Ghalghaï 1 I'm sure by such methods they will delete information in other articles everywhere.-- Товболатов ( talk) 05:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Above, these participants accuse me of nationalist edits. Although they themselves know well, the bulk of the Ingush and Chechens believe that the Chechens and Ingush are one brotherly people. I did not contribute anything nationalist. Only two peoples in the world speak the same language Chechens and Ingush. I consider these false accusations against me.-- Товболатов ( talk) 05:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
According to them, this is also a nationalist article Nakh peoples.-- Товболатов ( talk) 06:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Товболатов, the refusal to acknowledge an ethnic group and adding selective and dubious sources to make it seem like they stem from another ethnic group is a perfect example of nationalist editing and exactly what you have been doing (spamming) on these Ingush-related articles: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] -- Muqale ( talk) 06:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Rosguill May I know why the sanctions were applied only to me, and not to other participants. For nationalist accusations and more than two kickbacks?-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
If I knew it was spam, I wouldn't do it. These were the usual edits in my opinion. I won't do that.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Yesterday, if you had warned me, I would not have done this. Okay, now how to solve this.? This may be a warning. I am no longer going to edit Ingush articles. I don't know why I was the only one to blame. WikiEditor1234567123 just check out his contribution, it's not just me that's the edit war. Constant war of edits and he deliberately decided to drag me into the admin panel because the other participant stopped responding. He came in and started editing to spite me. Yes, it's my fault that I succumbed to the provocation.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Well thanks for your great patience. Still, I feel guilty.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Rosguill you can reconsider your original decision. I didn't do it on purpose, but I don't know. In the future, I will not repeat spam mailings.-- Товболатов ( talk) 20:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Locke Cole • t • c 00:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Добрый вечер! Я думаю эту статью должны редактировать незаинтересованные участники. Takhirgeran Umar ( talk) 15:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I noticed that Dsuke1998AEOS's redirects are not being autopatrolled, despite them being on the NPP redirect autopatrol list. Could this have anything to do with their entry on the autopatrol list being the only one that uses {{ user}} instead of {{ user2}}? Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, I would like to ask you to help me with my articles that are currently under consideration, how can I speed up the process of reviewing my articles? Targimhoï ( talk) 21:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill. Just a follow-up for an old draftification of yours. A couple of months later, the same editor moved it back to mainspace. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
For the past two years, I have actively contributed to the English Wikipedia. As per Wikipedia's User Access Roles Policy, I am interested in applying for the role of a new page reviewer. I have a good understanding of the responsibilities and significance of this role. To ensure that this role is not misused, I would like to participate in the NPP training program. Would you be able to assist me as a trainer? Endrabcwizart ( talk) 17:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Hi, as an active New Page Patroller, I wanted to make sure you were aware of an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation project to improve the PageTriage extension. We recently published results of user interviews, and have some findings that we would value patrollers' opinions on. If you haven't yet, please consider adding the project page to your watchlist to stay up to date with our progress! Samwalton9 (WMF) ( talk) 13:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill! I read about the the second paragraph in WP:UPNOT and I have a question on it. The paragraph says:
“ | In addition, there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense (e.g. pro-pedophilia advocacy). Whether serious or trolling, "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" is usually interpreted as applying to user space as well as the encyclopedia itself, and "Wikipedia is not censored" relates to article pages and images; in other namespaces there are restrictions aimed at ensuring relevance, value, and non-disruption to the community. You do have more latitude in user space than elsewhere, but don't be inconsiderate. Extremely offensive material may be removed on sight by any editor. | ” |
First of all, I am aware that all policies (or at least the majority of them) are the results of consensus. So can you show me where the archive of the discussion that led to this policy is? Or if it wasn't reached by consensus, then are there any rules or laws that it is based on? Đại Việt quốc ( talk) 06:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Surely not competent to edit and NOTHERE? Doug Weller talk 14:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, in the open Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you.
You are not directly affected by any proposed sanction; this is just for your information.
Your name appears on the page only once: "On 12 June 2022, Abrvagl was warned for edit warring by Rosguill", with a link to the log entry.
Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Juan Branco on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Chicago CRED on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill. I had a question regarding the Russian sources and was unsure of how they should be written. Should the source be written like 1 or 2?
1:
2:
I'm not sure if you noticed that seven minutes after you closed "Block review: WikiWikiWayne" at WP:AN, WWW archived it. I reverted the archiving and left him a warning on his Talk page that he should not be archiving a thread in which he was prominently involved. A few hours ago he archived it again without responding to my warning. I have a few choices (in no particular order): (1) do nothing; (2) unarchive it and give him a "final" warning; (3) unarchive it and block him; (4) bring him to ANI; (5) something else. What are your thoughts? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
WikiWikiWayne}} {
Talk}
13:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC){{u|
WikiWikiWayne}} {
Talk}
13:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)The very first line of DEPRECATED describes Tucker Carlson to a tee... "highly questionable sources that editors are discouraged from citing in articles, because they fail the reliable sources guideline in nearly all circumstance".
I am also not seeing any proof that depreciation exists solely for when Wikipedia is having a big problem preventing the use of "generally unreliable" sources. Clearly from the text, it is a judgement, a message that a non-deprecated use is somehow more usable or acceptable under certain circumstances.
Lastly, since my proposal did have clear support, and opposition wasn't exactly firm, I certainly think it's a stretch to say it hasn't a snowball's chance in hell. I find that deeply concerning in fact, given the effect your solitary decision has on shutting down any possibility Carlson can or should ever be deprecated. I do not think one person should have that much power to influence Wikipedia in such a big way. Carlson is already having a huge influence on the upcoming election (the British op-ed I found having been written precisely because of how crazy that is), so I hope you are comfortable with having set a precedent in Wikipedia up to and perhaps beyond that election.
If necessary, I can have a Wikipedia editor make this proposal on my behalf, to get around your clearly improper use of my status as an outsider to prevennt me from influencing how Wikipedia deals with a clearly unacceptable source like Carlson going forward. Jango Borundia ( talk) 15:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, hope you are well, this editor has been edit warring on several pages related to Bulgaria for years now [ [16]] including pages like List of wars involving Bulgaria usually inserting WP:OR edits, sometimes after ip would appeared with the same geolocation doing the same thing [ [17]], [ [18]] there are much more of them, and now just recently, this account appeared on the same page [ [19]]. I believe that they are the same person. Would you be willing to check it? Thank you on your response. Theonewithreason ( talk) 21:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Habsburg monarchy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Nice close on the Russian invasion page rename. I've just noticed that there was a sub-RfC attached to the main RfC which you just closed which asked for a moratorium on the name change requests. After reading them twice, then I am seeing some consensus on a short moratorium of 2-3 months, if I combine all the supports requesting a 1-year moratorium and a 6-month moratorium as combined with the 2-3 moratorium requests. It seems like it might make sense to close the sub-RfC to the main one you just closed as including a 2 month moratorium on further name changes. Any thoughts? ErnestKrause ( talk) 18:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Sorry it took so long! I was just burnt out on Wikipedia for a while and was busy with actual school.
Asparagusus (interaction) 18:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hiya. Was going to restore this here redirect as part of NPP, but there appears to be a fairly lively edit war going on. Any advice? Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill,
A user ( Saad Ali Khan Pakistan) has done quite a bit of page renaming in an effort to update the redrawn Constituencies of Pakistan. Would it be possible to have them temporarily added to the redirect autopatroll list to have the 300+ redirects completed at once? I don't want to request them for full redirect AP at this time, but I know you have, at times, temporarily added users to have batches completed. Hey man im josh ( talk) 11:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
The Mujahideen stuff was first added to the infobox in November 2022 [20] and since then has been removed and readded many times by several editors. Hence its addition does not have consensus. I expect from an experienced admin like you to do more than just revert to a controversial addition that has been contested so much. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 23:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Scientific racism on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. Hate to bug you, I sent When Laura smiles to RfD, but I noticed a failed message during the process. The template is there, but I do not see it on today's list. Not sure what to do. Onel5969 TT me 16:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, you often edit radio related articles, are you able to help with this, see talk page User_talk:77.86.103.78 - basically Kool FM becomes Kool London for ten years or so, then reverts back to Kool FM. Cut and Paste moves are frowned upon it appears 77.86.103.78 ( talk) 16:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on St. Mary's church, İzmir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
There are two Saint Mary's Catholic Churches in İzmir, the other one is being located at Bornova.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Veselov350 💬 18:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Other rivalries may use That School Up North, or The School Up North (which still redirects to OSU-Michigan, BTW), but it is still most associated with the Woody Hayes era at Ohio State. I would posit that the vast majority of users looking up that phrase would expect to be sent to that particular rivalry. DarkAudit ( talk) 08:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Dear Rosguill, you recently reviewed four Wikipedia's redirects that I created; I just would like to say you: thank you very much!! 7e8y ( talk) 08:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
Thanks for your input on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autry Technology Center page. Please see my response there. TulGuy ( talk) 02:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I hope all is going well. I'm reaching out to ask if you could check and see if the page I've been working on, Fairfield Stags softball, still does not meet WP:GNG standards. The tag was added before I was able to fill out the history section a little bit. I would like to expand it at some point in the future further although I'm working on a couple of other projects in the realm of college softball so it's not my #1 priority. I'm asking you if you can check because you placed the tag. Hopefully it meets the standards or at least is closer to meeting those standards. If it is not, I'll definitely work on it further. Thank you in advance! Mannytool ( talk) 06:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill,
I hope you're doing well! My old username was Angus1986(followed by AngusMEOW), and I was previously active in the NPP School on Wikipedia about 1-2 years ago. Unfortunately, I had to take a break due to some health-related issues. I'm happy to say that I've recovered and am excited to get back to contributing to the community.
I kindly request your assistance in resuming my involvement with the NPP School. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated as I reintegrate myself and continue learning. I'm looking forward to being an active and positive contributor once again.
Thank you for your time and support. Angus QuantumRealm ( meow • pawtrack) 17:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill. I once again had a question regarding the Russian sources. If the source is written with Russian pre-reform letters, should they be changed to the modern day corresponding Russian letters? For example, should "Старчевскій" be changed to "Старчевский" and "Сборникъ свѣдѣній о кавказскихъ горцахъ" to "Сборник сведений о кавказских горцах"? WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 19:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
You reviewed 1,5-Pentanediol. What did you find? I am just curious about this activity.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 18:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not delete my page. I spent hours and hours creating it. I did not plagiarize and no one paid me to do it. I referenced everything. I don't understand what I did wrong. Bigcurl254 ( talk) 15:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | → | Archive 40 |
Removed text from the encyclopedia again in this article Ingush societies 1. And then the text began to change. Apparently, this provokes me on purpose. Although there the text was neutral Galashkinskoe naibstvo. Товболатов ( talk) 05:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Here too this member deleted the text Muqale Ghalghaï 1 I'm sure by such methods they will delete information in other articles everywhere.-- Товболатов ( talk) 05:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Above, these participants accuse me of nationalist edits. Although they themselves know well, the bulk of the Ingush and Chechens believe that the Chechens and Ingush are one brotherly people. I did not contribute anything nationalist. Only two peoples in the world speak the same language Chechens and Ingush. I consider these false accusations against me.-- Товболатов ( talk) 05:55, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
According to them, this is also a nationalist article Nakh peoples.-- Товболатов ( talk) 06:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
@ Товболатов, the refusal to acknowledge an ethnic group and adding selective and dubious sources to make it seem like they stem from another ethnic group is a perfect example of nationalist editing and exactly what you have been doing (spamming) on these Ingush-related articles: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] -- Muqale ( talk) 06:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Rosguill May I know why the sanctions were applied only to me, and not to other participants. For nationalist accusations and more than two kickbacks?-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
If I knew it was spam, I wouldn't do it. These were the usual edits in my opinion. I won't do that.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Yesterday, if you had warned me, I would not have done this. Okay, now how to solve this.? This may be a warning. I am no longer going to edit Ingush articles. I don't know why I was the only one to blame. WikiEditor1234567123 just check out his contribution, it's not just me that's the edit war. Constant war of edits and he deliberately decided to drag me into the admin panel because the other participant stopped responding. He came in and started editing to spite me. Yes, it's my fault that I succumbed to the provocation.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Well thanks for your great patience. Still, I feel guilty.-- Товболатов ( talk) 16:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Rosguill you can reconsider your original decision. I didn't do it on purpose, but I don't know. In the future, I will not repeat spam mailings.-- Товболатов ( talk) 20:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Locke Cole • t • c 00:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Добрый вечер! Я думаю эту статью должны редактировать незаинтересованные участники. Takhirgeran Umar ( talk) 15:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I noticed that Dsuke1998AEOS's redirects are not being autopatrolled, despite them being on the NPP redirect autopatrol list. Could this have anything to do with their entry on the autopatrol list being the only one that uses {{ user}} instead of {{ user2}}? Hey man im josh ( talk) 19:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, I would like to ask you to help me with my articles that are currently under consideration, how can I speed up the process of reviewing my articles? Targimhoï ( talk) 21:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill. Just a follow-up for an old draftification of yours. A couple of months later, the same editor moved it back to mainspace. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
For the past two years, I have actively contributed to the English Wikipedia. As per Wikipedia's User Access Roles Policy, I am interested in applying for the role of a new page reviewer. I have a good understanding of the responsibilities and significance of this role. To ensure that this role is not misused, I would like to participate in the NPP training program. Would you be able to assist me as a trainer? Endrabcwizart ( talk) 17:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
Hi, as an active New Page Patroller, I wanted to make sure you were aware of an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation project to improve the PageTriage extension. We recently published results of user interviews, and have some findings that we would value patrollers' opinions on. If you haven't yet, please consider adding the project page to your watchlist to stay up to date with our progress! Samwalton9 (WMF) ( talk) 13:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill! I read about the the second paragraph in WP:UPNOT and I have a question on it. The paragraph says:
“ | In addition, there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute, or which is likely to give widespread offense (e.g. pro-pedophilia advocacy). Whether serious or trolling, "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" is usually interpreted as applying to user space as well as the encyclopedia itself, and "Wikipedia is not censored" relates to article pages and images; in other namespaces there are restrictions aimed at ensuring relevance, value, and non-disruption to the community. You do have more latitude in user space than elsewhere, but don't be inconsiderate. Extremely offensive material may be removed on sight by any editor. | ” |
First of all, I am aware that all policies (or at least the majority of them) are the results of consensus. So can you show me where the archive of the discussion that led to this policy is? Or if it wasn't reached by consensus, then are there any rules or laws that it is based on? Đại Việt quốc ( talk) 06:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Surely not competent to edit and NOTHERE? Doug Weller talk 14:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, in the open Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you.
You are not directly affected by any proposed sanction; this is just for your information.
Your name appears on the page only once: "On 12 June 2022, Abrvagl was warned for edit warring by Rosguill", with a link to the log entry.
Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Juan Branco on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Chicago CRED on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill. I had a question regarding the Russian sources and was unsure of how they should be written. Should the source be written like 1 or 2?
1:
2:
I'm not sure if you noticed that seven minutes after you closed "Block review: WikiWikiWayne" at WP:AN, WWW archived it. I reverted the archiving and left him a warning on his Talk page that he should not be archiving a thread in which he was prominently involved. A few hours ago he archived it again without responding to my warning. I have a few choices (in no particular order): (1) do nothing; (2) unarchive it and give him a "final" warning; (3) unarchive it and block him; (4) bring him to ANI; (5) something else. What are your thoughts? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
{{u|
WikiWikiWayne}} {
Talk}
13:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC){{u|
WikiWikiWayne}} {
Talk}
13:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)The very first line of DEPRECATED describes Tucker Carlson to a tee... "highly questionable sources that editors are discouraged from citing in articles, because they fail the reliable sources guideline in nearly all circumstance".
I am also not seeing any proof that depreciation exists solely for when Wikipedia is having a big problem preventing the use of "generally unreliable" sources. Clearly from the text, it is a judgement, a message that a non-deprecated use is somehow more usable or acceptable under certain circumstances.
Lastly, since my proposal did have clear support, and opposition wasn't exactly firm, I certainly think it's a stretch to say it hasn't a snowball's chance in hell. I find that deeply concerning in fact, given the effect your solitary decision has on shutting down any possibility Carlson can or should ever be deprecated. I do not think one person should have that much power to influence Wikipedia in such a big way. Carlson is already having a huge influence on the upcoming election (the British op-ed I found having been written precisely because of how crazy that is), so I hope you are comfortable with having set a precedent in Wikipedia up to and perhaps beyond that election.
If necessary, I can have a Wikipedia editor make this proposal on my behalf, to get around your clearly improper use of my status as an outsider to prevennt me from influencing how Wikipedia deals with a clearly unacceptable source like Carlson going forward. Jango Borundia ( talk) 15:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill, hope you are well, this editor has been edit warring on several pages related to Bulgaria for years now [ [16]] including pages like List of wars involving Bulgaria usually inserting WP:OR edits, sometimes after ip would appeared with the same geolocation doing the same thing [ [17]], [ [18]] there are much more of them, and now just recently, this account appeared on the same page [ [19]]. I believe that they are the same person. Would you be willing to check it? Thank you on your response. Theonewithreason ( talk) 21:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Habsburg monarchy on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Nice close on the Russian invasion page rename. I've just noticed that there was a sub-RfC attached to the main RfC which you just closed which asked for a moratorium on the name change requests. After reading them twice, then I am seeing some consensus on a short moratorium of 2-3 months, if I combine all the supports requesting a 1-year moratorium and a 6-month moratorium as combined with the 2-3 moratorium requests. It seems like it might make sense to close the sub-RfC to the main one you just closed as including a 2 month moratorium on further name changes. Any thoughts? ErnestKrause ( talk) 18:09, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Sorry it took so long! I was just burnt out on Wikipedia for a while and was busy with actual school.
Asparagusus (interaction) 18:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hiya. Was going to restore this here redirect as part of NPP, but there appears to be a fairly lively edit war going on. Any advice? Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 06:58, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey Rosguill,
A user ( Saad Ali Khan Pakistan) has done quite a bit of page renaming in an effort to update the redrawn Constituencies of Pakistan. Would it be possible to have them temporarily added to the redirect autopatroll list to have the 300+ redirects completed at once? I don't want to request them for full redirect AP at this time, but I know you have, at times, temporarily added users to have batches completed. Hey man im josh ( talk) 11:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
The Mujahideen stuff was first added to the infobox in November 2022 [20] and since then has been removed and readded many times by several editors. Hence its addition does not have consensus. I expect from an experienced admin like you to do more than just revert to a controversial addition that has been contested so much. Ktrimi991 ( talk) 23:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Scientific racism on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there. Hate to bug you, I sent When Laura smiles to RfD, but I noticed a failed message during the process. The template is there, but I do not see it on today's list. Not sure what to do. Onel5969 TT me 16:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, you often edit radio related articles, are you able to help with this, see talk page User_talk:77.86.103.78 - basically Kool FM becomes Kool London for ten years or so, then reverts back to Kool FM. Cut and Paste moves are frowned upon it appears 77.86.103.78 ( talk) 16:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on St. Mary's church, İzmir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
There are two Saint Mary's Catholic Churches in İzmir, the other one is being located at Bornova.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Veselov350 💬 18:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Other rivalries may use That School Up North, or The School Up North (which still redirects to OSU-Michigan, BTW), but it is still most associated with the Woody Hayes era at Ohio State. I would posit that the vast majority of users looking up that phrase would expect to be sent to that particular rivalry. DarkAudit ( talk) 08:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Dear Rosguill, you recently reviewed four Wikipedia's redirects that I created; I just would like to say you: thank you very much!! 7e8y ( talk) 08:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
Thanks for your input on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autry Technology Center page. Please see my response there. TulGuy ( talk) 02:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I hope all is going well. I'm reaching out to ask if you could check and see if the page I've been working on, Fairfield Stags softball, still does not meet WP:GNG standards. The tag was added before I was able to fill out the history section a little bit. I would like to expand it at some point in the future further although I'm working on a couple of other projects in the realm of college softball so it's not my #1 priority. I'm asking you if you can check because you placed the tag. Hopefully it meets the standards or at least is closer to meeting those standards. If it is not, I'll definitely work on it further. Thank you in advance! Mannytool ( talk) 06:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill,
I hope you're doing well! My old username was Angus1986(followed by AngusMEOW), and I was previously active in the NPP School on Wikipedia about 1-2 years ago. Unfortunately, I had to take a break due to some health-related issues. I'm happy to say that I've recovered and am excited to get back to contributing to the community.
I kindly request your assistance in resuming my involvement with the NPP School. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated as I reintegrate myself and continue learning. I'm looking forward to being an active and positive contributor once again.
Thank you for your time and support. Angus QuantumRealm ( meow • pawtrack) 17:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill. I once again had a question regarding the Russian sources. If the source is written with Russian pre-reform letters, should they be changed to the modern day corresponding Russian letters? For example, should "Старчевскій" be changed to "Старчевский" and "Сборникъ свѣдѣній о кавказскихъ горцахъ" to "Сборник сведений о кавказских горцах"? WikiEditor1234567123 ( talk) 19:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
Backlog
Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.
Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.
Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.
You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.
Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).
Reminders
You reviewed 1,5-Pentanediol. What did you find? I am just curious about this activity.-- Smokefoot ( talk) 18:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Please do not delete my page. I spent hours and hours creating it. I did not plagiarize and no one paid me to do it. I referenced everything. I don't understand what I did wrong. Bigcurl254 ( talk) 15:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)