This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
The nominator began re-writing the original article to make it about the 1990 film, rather than the neologism. [1] Agreeing with him and the direction he was going, I further modified the article to be about the film, rather than the word. [2] I'm thinking now based upon improvements and discussions, that if kept the now re-written article can be moved to Mankurt (film) as a dis-ambig, and the word "mankurt" can be set as a clean redirect to the novel as suggested in the AFD discussion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
I would value your comments at Talk:Musical theatre, where an editor wishes to delete all of the ELs to the article. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Ah! We meet again.. I think you're right about the name. I added it as a redirect but the list of IPPF affiliates has it the way you suggested. I fixed the name for the Netherlands affiliate to meet that, perhaps that should be done here too... W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 03:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WP:ANI/3RR regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Haymaker ( talk) 17:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
You appear to be involved in an edit war, according to the reverts you have made on Bernard Nathanson. If you edit disruptively including breaking the three-revert rule you may be blocked without further warning.
I see two reliable sources cited in the stub, therefore it meets WP:GNG. I removed your "prod", but you can take it to WP:AfD. Bearian ( talk) 00:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Please see the discussion on the talk page about a controversial sentence you recently rewrote. I'm trying to negotiate a dispute. Thanks Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 01:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
I didn't know that Fabian Forte was a pope. Live and learn. PhGustaf ( talk) 06:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Considering there is an active discussion on quantifying "they", and considering you are participating in said discussion, I am at a loss to understand why you removed the tag indicating there is an issue. Lionel ( talk) 06:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Roscelese. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lionel ( talk) 07:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment. Best wishes, Voceditenore ( talk) 11:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
On 5 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Mouse Problem, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Monty Python sketch " The Mouse Problem", a mockumentary about men who want to be mice, parodies 1960s TV documentaries on homosexuality? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For starting the discussion that got those danged Bias Categories Standardized! (Knock on wood.) CarolMooreDC ( talk) 02:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Rosceles, I created a new article, Joseph Maraachli case, I thought you might be interested in. Feel free to get involved. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 00:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For tireless work on the front line concerning reproductive health. Span ( talk) 04:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
I've been following your work at the coalface for a while. You are doing sterling, long haul work. I am focused on poetry but wanted to say that I recognise your vital efforts. Best wishes Span ( talk) 05:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
The reason I did not remake BS24's article Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute into one describing more 19th century feminists is that Anthony is the clearest case, the most easily debunked. Stanton and Gage and others are on record about their anti-abortion stance whereas Anthony never said anything concrete. Binksternet ( talk) 20:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your diligent work on so many entries. I'm glad you're participating in WikiProject Women's History. If you have any questions, concerns, or bright ideas about the project, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Since you've been active on Wikipedia for a long time, I'd be particularly interested in hearing your thoughts about how we might recruit more editors and get people excited about contributing. ---Shane Landrum ( cliotropic | talk | contribs) 00:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm asking you because, after seeing some of your messages, I believe I can trust you. Would you review an article I wrote, and if appropriate, remove the "unreviewed" template? Thanks! Affirming Pentecostal Church Bill BroWCarey ( talk) 03:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks... I'll edit it and see if it's better! BroWCarey ( talk) 03:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I did reword the article, updated a few things. I am working on sources, so I'm not done. But if you get a chance, would you read the article again, and see if it sounds better? Thanks! BroWCarey ( talk) 04:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
It is poor form, when an editor criticizes you at the wiktiquette noticeboard, as I just did, to accuse them baselessly of a failure of witiquette. I've of course not made any personal attacks. I think that, as a person, you a fine specimen of humanity. Your edits, however, as I have pointed out, are disruptive and inappropriate. One does not contribute to the project by tag-bombing articles with wholly unfounded tags, as you did, and then doing the same to editors' talk pages. Kindly desist. Please take this as a final warning.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 01:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese, I wanted to make sure you were aware of this mailing list, which all can join -- https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- to discuss women on Wikipedia, and how to increase participation. If you already know about it, sorry to bother you, I just wanted to be sure. Cheers, SlimVirgin TALK| CONTRIBS 01:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not use the collapse feature to censor comments of others that you may disagree with, or otherwise dislike, as you have now done twice here at a noticeboard discussion. It is censorship, disruptive, and edit warring. Kindly take this as a final warning.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 01:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I almost blocked you for 1RR on The Silent Scream, but in my opinion, you just barely stayed on the right side, and another admin might have made the call the other way.-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 13:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
72.156.248.10 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
As that you logged out, or is someone impersonating you? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I started a thread at WP:ANI about an admin. You're not the subject of the thread, but you were involved. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 19:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
In accordance with this and with this? -- Mbz1 ( talk) 00:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I consider this to be a personal attack, and recommend you revert yourself.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 04:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I found Librarians Weigh in on a Book Dealing with Same-Sex Marriage which may help the book discussion. Trekhippie ( talk) 01:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Shalom, Bonjour, your question in the discussion is Can you help suggest ways of improving it ?
See here. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 20:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for self-reverting there -- as the sanctions are "broadly construed", they would have applied in this case. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 18:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
"BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, and categories." Jayjg (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I believe I have addressed the issues you raised with a proposed alternate hook, and editing the article. Canada Hky ( talk) 22:32, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese, I just wanted to get your help on the Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state article. I'm working on a replacement article in my sandbox here - User:NYyankees51/marriage/new. The current article is not very helpful and I'm trying to make a comprehensive state-by-state list. I made a table listing all the states prohibiting gay marriage by voter referendum. I'm not very good at tables so if you know how to work with them to make it look better, that would be great, and any help you can provide to the sandbox article would be great as well. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 17:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
All of the above clearly demonstrates that you had not a slightest idea what you were doing, when you reinstalled the tag with a pointed edit summary, but you know what I am not even going to remove it, because I do believe that there are lots of POV in the article installed by another side, for example I believe that the information that the murders "dipped their hands into the boys' blood" is supported by a few RS and should have been represented in the article.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 16:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
This article as it is now is completely unbalanced, as it does not mention the consequences for the Palestinian villages in the vicinity.
(Exactly the same thing happened to the villages nearby the Itamar-settlement 2 weeks ago, after the Itamar killings: a whole village was under house-arrest by the Israeli army, while settlers from Itamar simply stole another 20-25 dunum of privately owned Palestinian olive groves. There is a reason why Israelis call the occupied West Bank for the "Wild West Bank"!)
Quotes: "Settlers stoned Palestinians on the roads through Gush Etzion." Time Magazine, "settlers threw stones at Palestinian cars and the Israeli army sealed off the nearby Arab village of Tuqu," BBC Report, and this link. This article deserves a {{POV|date=March 2011}} tag.
On 4 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article King & King, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that because it depicts a same-sex marriage, the children's picture book King & King was the subject of a question in the 2008 Democratic U.S. presidential primary debates? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 00:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me create an article . Could you tell me ASAP how you edit semi protected articles if they have some wrong information. Thank you dude. From Millanmane.
Thank you for the suggestion. I am getting more opinios here. -- Minerva97 ( talk) 17:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
No, thanks a lot. If I need something, I'll ask you. -- Minerva97 ( talk) 19:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
I responded to your post on my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.108.232.34 ( talk) 04:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've been working on the SPLC group listing and found a link to your page in process. I think both lists can be useful and maybe even dovetail each other as the first list has subject area's defined whereas your list notes specific for each group which I think is very helpful. I just wanted to say hello. Jnast1 ( talk) 19:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
I'd rather would not see your user name in my watch list in regards to new articles I write. After our past encounters I do not consider your involvement in my new articles to be one of a good faith attempt to improve wikipedia. I believe that it will be better, if from now on we will go our separate ways.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 19:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your invaluable work on the Blue Labour article. River sider ( talk) 10:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
He's still at it, and he's removed our notices from his talk page twice now. I think ANI is the best course of action, although I've never done it before, so not sure how to go about it. Jonchapple ( talk) 14:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. You're pretty quick. Anyway, I'll be working on it for the next couple of hours. I'm just about to look at Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality. St Anselm ( talk) 06:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
This is a gentle reminder start you started reviewing the composer for DYK, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you ended a question to me like this and I wondered what this means. Regards Hekerui ( talk) 20:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
"'While several watchdog organizations (e.g., the Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League) estimate the number and impact of white racial extremists and their organizations, there is no scholarly accounting for the number of members of white racial extremists in the United States." [3] Jnast1 ( talk) 21:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello Roscelese. I hope that you won't take offense at my post on the navbox for discussion that you started today about the Dr Who navbox. I agree with some parts of your objection to the content that is currently in there. I just don't want complete removal of it at this time. I do want to offer my apologies if the way that I have put my case does cause you any offense.
My question comes about from your post about the Dr Who actors category that you also commented on. You mention OCAT as one of the reasons for its removal. I'm not sure what that is but I am wondering of it came about when the numerous "Actor in" cats were deleted a few years ago. I am also wondering if it might apply to this Category:Rumpole of the Bailey that was created last month. While the cat has a few listings from the show that are behind the camera people it seems to be mostly populated by actors who appeared in the series. Thank you for your time in reading this and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 18:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Have a sweet Passover. Bearian ( talk) 17:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know I undid your edit at Deep Blue Sea. Although it's entirely possible (likely?) that it's a case of reverse infringement, the article has been listed at WP:CP and unless we can be sure that it was copied from Wikipedia, the tag should be left in place until the issue has been resolved. Either that, or the plot could be re-written, but that's probably a lot of work which may well be unnecessary. :) -- Beloved Freak 19:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
I've been wheel warred into a 3RR warning by individuals whitewashing the "hate group" moniker.
And have a nice passover. I'm such a secular Jew, that if I didn't have these things on my iPhone, I wouldn't even know. Now I know why all my friends have been leaving me messages as to what I am doing this week. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 17:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I meant to write it as I did then try to find a way to word it more clearly but forgot and submitted it. NYyankees51 ( talk) 20:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I agree with your sentiment at Talk:Pro-life#Requested move, again, but I'm not sure you got the proposal right. Right now it looks like you want to move Abortion-rights movement back to Pro-choice and Pro-life to Anti-abortion movement? If you want the titles to be parallel that would just flip the bias. – CWenger ( ^ • @) 16:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
The nominator began re-writing the original article to make it about the 1990 film, rather than the neologism. [1] Agreeing with him and the direction he was going, I further modified the article to be about the film, rather than the word. [2] I'm thinking now based upon improvements and discussions, that if kept the now re-written article can be moved to Mankurt (film) as a dis-ambig, and the word "mankurt" can be set as a clean redirect to the novel as suggested in the AFD discussion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
I would value your comments at Talk:Musical theatre, where an editor wishes to delete all of the ELs to the article. -- Ssilvers ( talk) 22:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Ah! We meet again.. I think you're right about the name. I added it as a redirect but the list of IPPF affiliates has it the way you suggested. I fixed the name for the Netherlands affiliate to meet that, perhaps that should be done here too... W M O Please leave me a wb if you reply 03:06, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WP:ANI/3RR regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Haymaker ( talk) 17:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
You appear to be involved in an edit war, according to the reverts you have made on Bernard Nathanson. If you edit disruptively including breaking the three-revert rule you may be blocked without further warning.
I see two reliable sources cited in the stub, therefore it meets WP:GNG. I removed your "prod", but you can take it to WP:AfD. Bearian ( talk) 00:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Please see the discussion on the talk page about a controversial sentence you recently rewrote. I'm trying to negotiate a dispute. Thanks Bmclaughlin9 ( talk) 01:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:11, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
I didn't know that Fabian Forte was a pope. Live and learn. PhGustaf ( talk) 06:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Considering there is an active discussion on quantifying "they", and considering you are participating in said discussion, I am at a loss to understand why you removed the tag indicating there is an issue. Lionel ( talk) 06:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Roscelese. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lionel ( talk) 07:16, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment. Best wishes, Voceditenore ( talk) 11:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
On 5 March 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Mouse Problem, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Monty Python sketch " The Mouse Problem", a mockumentary about men who want to be mice, parodies 1960s TV documentaries on homosexuality? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For starting the discussion that got those danged Bias Categories Standardized! (Knock on wood.) CarolMooreDC ( talk) 02:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Rosceles, I created a new article, Joseph Maraachli case, I thought you might be interested in. Feel free to get involved. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 00:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For tireless work on the front line concerning reproductive health. Span ( talk) 04:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC) |
I've been following your work at the coalface for a while. You are doing sterling, long haul work. I am focused on poetry but wanted to say that I recognise your vital efforts. Best wishes Span ( talk) 05:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
The reason I did not remake BS24's article Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute into one describing more 19th century feminists is that Anthony is the clearest case, the most easily debunked. Stanton and Gage and others are on record about their anti-abortion stance whereas Anthony never said anything concrete. Binksternet ( talk) 20:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your diligent work on so many entries. I'm glad you're participating in WikiProject Women's History. If you have any questions, concerns, or bright ideas about the project, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Since you've been active on Wikipedia for a long time, I'd be particularly interested in hearing your thoughts about how we might recruit more editors and get people excited about contributing. ---Shane Landrum ( cliotropic | talk | contribs) 00:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'm asking you because, after seeing some of your messages, I believe I can trust you. Would you review an article I wrote, and if appropriate, remove the "unreviewed" template? Thanks! Affirming Pentecostal Church Bill BroWCarey ( talk) 03:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks... I'll edit it and see if it's better! BroWCarey ( talk) 03:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I did reword the article, updated a few things. I am working on sources, so I'm not done. But if you get a chance, would you read the article again, and see if it sounds better? Thanks! BroWCarey ( talk) 04:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
It is poor form, when an editor criticizes you at the wiktiquette noticeboard, as I just did, to accuse them baselessly of a failure of witiquette. I've of course not made any personal attacks. I think that, as a person, you a fine specimen of humanity. Your edits, however, as I have pointed out, are disruptive and inappropriate. One does not contribute to the project by tag-bombing articles with wholly unfounded tags, as you did, and then doing the same to editors' talk pages. Kindly desist. Please take this as a final warning.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 01:39, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese, I wanted to make sure you were aware of this mailing list, which all can join -- https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- to discuss women on Wikipedia, and how to increase participation. If you already know about it, sorry to bother you, I just wanted to be sure. Cheers, SlimVirgin TALK| CONTRIBS 01:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Please do not use the collapse feature to censor comments of others that you may disagree with, or otherwise dislike, as you have now done twice here at a noticeboard discussion. It is censorship, disruptive, and edit warring. Kindly take this as a final warning.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 01:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I almost blocked you for 1RR on The Silent Scream, but in my opinion, you just barely stayed on the right side, and another admin might have made the call the other way.-- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 13:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
72.156.248.10 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
As that you logged out, or is someone impersonating you? ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I started a thread at WP:ANI about an admin. You're not the subject of the thread, but you were involved. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 19:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
In accordance with this and with this? -- Mbz1 ( talk) 00:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I consider this to be a personal attack, and recommend you revert yourself.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 04:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
I found Librarians Weigh in on a Book Dealing with Same-Sex Marriage which may help the book discussion. Trekhippie ( talk) 01:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Shalom, Bonjour, your question in the discussion is Can you help suggest ways of improving it ?
See here. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 20:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for self-reverting there -- as the sanctions are "broadly construed", they would have applied in this case. -- SarekOfVulcan ( talk) 18:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
"BLP applies to all material about living persons anywhere on Wikipedia, including talk pages, edit summaries, user pages, images, and categories." Jayjg (talk) 23:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I believe I have addressed the issues you raised with a proposed alternate hook, and editing the article. Canada Hky ( talk) 22:32, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Roscelese, I just wanted to get your help on the Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state article. I'm working on a replacement article in my sandbox here - User:NYyankees51/marriage/new. The current article is not very helpful and I'm trying to make a comprehensive state-by-state list. I made a table listing all the states prohibiting gay marriage by voter referendum. I'm not very good at tables so if you know how to work with them to make it look better, that would be great, and any help you can provide to the sandbox article would be great as well. Thanks! NYyankees51 ( talk) 17:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
All of the above clearly demonstrates that you had not a slightest idea what you were doing, when you reinstalled the tag with a pointed edit summary, but you know what I am not even going to remove it, because I do believe that there are lots of POV in the article installed by another side, for example I believe that the information that the murders "dipped their hands into the boys' blood" is supported by a few RS and should have been represented in the article.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 16:28, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
This article as it is now is completely unbalanced, as it does not mention the consequences for the Palestinian villages in the vicinity.
(Exactly the same thing happened to the villages nearby the Itamar-settlement 2 weeks ago, after the Itamar killings: a whole village was under house-arrest by the Israeli army, while settlers from Itamar simply stole another 20-25 dunum of privately owned Palestinian olive groves. There is a reason why Israelis call the occupied West Bank for the "Wild West Bank"!)
Quotes: "Settlers stoned Palestinians on the roads through Gush Etzion." Time Magazine, "settlers threw stones at Palestinian cars and the Israeli army sealed off the nearby Arab village of Tuqu," BBC Report, and this link. This article deserves a {{POV|date=March 2011}} tag.
On 4 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article King & King, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that because it depicts a same-sex marriage, the children's picture book King & King was the subject of a question in the 2008 Democratic U.S. presidential primary debates? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 00:05, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me create an article . Could you tell me ASAP how you edit semi protected articles if they have some wrong information. Thank you dude. From Millanmane.
Thank you for the suggestion. I am getting more opinios here. -- Minerva97 ( talk) 17:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
No, thanks a lot. If I need something, I'll ask you. -- Minerva97 ( talk) 19:22, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
I responded to your post on my talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.108.232.34 ( talk) 04:31, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I've been working on the SPLC group listing and found a link to your page in process. I think both lists can be useful and maybe even dovetail each other as the first list has subject area's defined whereas your list notes specific for each group which I think is very helpful. I just wanted to say hello. Jnast1 ( talk) 19:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
I'd rather would not see your user name in my watch list in regards to new articles I write. After our past encounters I do not consider your involvement in my new articles to be one of a good faith attempt to improve wikipedia. I believe that it will be better, if from now on we will go our separate ways.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 19:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your invaluable work on the Blue Labour article. River sider ( talk) 10:13, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
He's still at it, and he's removed our notices from his talk page twice now. I think ANI is the best course of action, although I've never done it before, so not sure how to go about it. Jonchapple ( talk) 14:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. You're pretty quick. Anyway, I'll be working on it for the next couple of hours. I'm just about to look at Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality. St Anselm ( talk) 06:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
This is a gentle reminder start you started reviewing the composer for DYK, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, you ended a question to me like this and I wondered what this means. Regards Hekerui ( talk) 20:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
"'While several watchdog organizations (e.g., the Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League) estimate the number and impact of white racial extremists and their organizations, there is no scholarly accounting for the number of members of white racial extremists in the United States." [3] Jnast1 ( talk) 21:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello Roscelese. I hope that you won't take offense at my post on the navbox for discussion that you started today about the Dr Who navbox. I agree with some parts of your objection to the content that is currently in there. I just don't want complete removal of it at this time. I do want to offer my apologies if the way that I have put my case does cause you any offense.
My question comes about from your post about the Dr Who actors category that you also commented on. You mention OCAT as one of the reasons for its removal. I'm not sure what that is but I am wondering of it came about when the numerous "Actor in" cats were deleted a few years ago. I am also wondering if it might apply to this Category:Rumpole of the Bailey that was created last month. While the cat has a few listings from the show that are behind the camera people it seems to be mostly populated by actors who appeared in the series. Thank you for your time in reading this and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 18:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Have a sweet Passover. Bearian ( talk) 17:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, just to let you know I undid your edit at Deep Blue Sea. Although it's entirely possible (likely?) that it's a case of reverse infringement, the article has been listed at WP:CP and unless we can be sure that it was copied from Wikipedia, the tag should be left in place until the issue has been resolved. Either that, or the plot could be re-written, but that's probably a lot of work which may well be unnecessary. :) -- Beloved Freak 19:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
I've been wheel warred into a 3RR warning by individuals whitewashing the "hate group" moniker.
And have a nice passover. I'm such a secular Jew, that if I didn't have these things on my iPhone, I wouldn't even know. Now I know why all my friends have been leaving me messages as to what I am doing this week. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 17:23, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that, I meant to write it as I did then try to find a way to word it more clearly but forgot and submitted it. NYyankees51 ( talk) 20:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
I agree with your sentiment at Talk:Pro-life#Requested move, again, but I'm not sure you got the proposal right. Right now it looks like you want to move Abortion-rights movement back to Pro-choice and Pro-life to Anti-abortion movement? If you want the titles to be parallel that would just flip the bias. – CWenger ( ^ • @) 16:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)