![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi, you sent me a message about an edit I made to a psychochemical weapons page. The only problem here is that I didn't make any edits to any psychochemical weapons pages. 131.212.202.74 ( talk) 17:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Ah, wait, nevermind. I remember that edit now. I had no idea wikipedia made pages tracking this stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.212.202.74 ( talk) 17:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
For your concern about the current political climate in Garfield Hts. It seems that Ron Finerty, (aka Bobblehead or Ronf57) chooses to edit this article with his opinions of the current incumbant Mayor and certain Council members. It should be noted that Wagner promised Finertys' wife the position of economic development director on the off chance he gets elected. Its as if the people of Garfield Hts dont know dirty tricks when they see them. Keep an eye on Finertys comments as they get more laughable. Custom500 ( talk) 21:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Spermophagia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spermophagia. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies ( talk) 17:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I apologize... I didn't realize that it would be considered unconstructive... thanks for the heads up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.248.36 ( talk) 17:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
at the article "vigilante"
i changed the following "unlawful" into unjust (as shown with the >> and << characters below)
"A vigilante is someone who unlawfully punishes a criminal, or participates in a mob or conspiracy to mete out >>unlawful<< punishment to a criminal or criminals."
this is because vigilantes act on what they think is unjust, not necessarily on what the government thinks is unjust.
but this change was reverted by you, i'd like an explanation please 85.144.133.46 ( talk) 22:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
The recent message you left me regarding my edit to the page Taxpayer March on Washington appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the message was constructive, please ensure that you review the Life magazine "slideshow" before intervening. You may also wish to read the rulebook on External Links. Thank you. Kenatipo ( talk) 17:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Bah! I didn't revert right on the Chevy page, thanks for fixing it =) SparksBoy (Huggle) ( talk) 21:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted edits that User:Locutus0fLegi0n made to my pages. First of all, thank you.
I've had problems with them before, and they seem to hate me for no reason. They know full well what they are doing, and won't stop unless they're perma-banned.
I need to get them perma-banned, however I don't know how to go about that. They've been after me, off and on, for the past few weeks -- I had been impersonated on YouTube, my life has been mocked, and yet you see these messages and think nothing of it?
"We have your dox." They claim to have my information, but...
They need to stop, but I don't know the proper channels to go through. Daniel Benfield ( talk) 22:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
19:10.54 ClueBot-2: Possible vandalism: Tank changed by Jollybro replacing entire content with something else on (N/A). 19:10.54 ClueBot-3: ( http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Tank&action=history | http://en.wikipedia.org/?diff=319715299&oldid=319715114 ) 19:10.54 ClueBot-5: Reverting ... 19:10.55 ClueBot-2: Grr! Beaten by Ronhjones.
ClueBot: 0 - You: 1
Anyways I just saw that in the IRC and wanted to say congrats. :) -- Sidonuke ( talk :: contribs) 23:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for my revision of Scooby-Doo, was just trying to remove rather a lot of vandalism (picures of genitallia, words changed to penis etc) by some random. Apparently Marek69 had the same idea, but noticed some things I didn't (so reverted it further).
Just thought I'd let ya know Alphathon
Hi. Sorry to leave two messages, but I'm a little tired atm so forgot to put my sig and a title in the prev message (which I have quoted below).
"Sorry for my revision of Scooby-Doo, was just trying to remove rather a lot of vandalism (picures of genitallia, words changed to penis etc) by some random. Apparently Marek69 had the same idea, but noticed some things I didn't (so reverted it further).
Just thought I'd let ya know"
Sorry again Alphathon ( talk) 00:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, Ronhjones, for watching out for my userpage. It's been continually vandalized by the same individual for the past few days. I very much appreciate your vigilance! Basket of Puppies 22:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ron.
I had added the Diamond Chess page in good faith as something that might be of interest. Other chess variants appeared, such as hexagonal chess. I received notice from the moderators that Wikipedia is "not a gaming site" and that it should be deleted.
I thought this a bit inconsistent since numerous other games appear, but to comply, I removed the offending article.
Now, I am getting warnings and final warnings for having taken it down.
I am not really sure what I should do at this point. If you folks want it up, I will put it up. If you want it down, I will take it down. If you want it modified in some way, and then put up, I am happy to do that as well.
Please advise as to what I need to do, and remove the warnings from my ID.
My intent was (and still is) to share, never to offend.
Thanks,
Jim Guyer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimguyer ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
How can I be an Admin 666isactuallyaholynumber ( talk) 22:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This looks like a content dispute to me, rather than vandalism. See User_talk:Rrburke#ACT_Debating_Union_Entry. Cheers. 22:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, again. I'm interested in knowing more about the "why's" and the "how's" of the reversions of my addition of wording to the Life slideshow External Link. EL guidelines, I think, suggest that links with a POV should be so noted by adding a comment. EL guidelines do not require that ELs be footnoted (I looked at dozens of ELs in many articles - not a single footnote). My opinion is that anyone who compared the Time and the Life photo-essays/slideshows would conclude that one was neutral and one had a clear POV. I wasn't violating any policy by Being Bold - just the opposite. Now, the words I chose to add may have been too bold for some, but that's no reason for reverting the whole thing -- just tone them down a little. Requiring that the whole issue be discussed on the talk page is like requiring group consensus on whether 2 + 2 really equals 4. My adding a comment to an EL is not vandalism. Which brings me to my question: why does Huggle classify my revert of APK's revert as "vandalism"? thanks. Kenatipo ( talk) 17:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ron,
Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Could you go ahead and remove reference to Diamond Chess from chess variants for now?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_variant
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimguyer ( talk • contribs) 20:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate that...maybe I can repay the favor sometime. :)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕))
23:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I will ask you to please talk to me prior to making any changes. Have the respect that I am working on a page. I would dearly appreciate it. Thank you! By the way there are Thousands of pages on Wiki that need to be worked on, that have been ignored for quite some time. Please appreciate those that are working towards completion. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modelmanager ( talk • contribs) 22:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
The AFD template is unwarranted and not valid my page was confirmed yesterday! Too many editors on here, go purge the thousands of wiki pages that need mass edits that no one is working on. Please, I am trying my best here. Work with me!!! Modelmanager ( talk) 22:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Modelmanager
Thank you for looking out for my userpage! Dac04 ( talk) 23:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I get tried of editors like you did you even bother reading my edit summary did you look at the edit history or the talk page to see the background of Haberstr edits or the fact he reverted any edits done in the past few months to the last time he tried to push his version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.38.135 ( talk) 23:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I think he was trying to blank the page, so I've replaced it with SD-blank. HalfShadow ( talk) 22:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Who r u
Don't make me call admin
U my postings NO —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceo7 ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page so quickly Barret ( talk) 22:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
DINT DO NUFFIN M8 Y U HAVIN A GO? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.16.159 ( talk) 00:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Chelsea Football Club is not a subject entirely related to Britain. They have a global fanbase and play football throughout the world in places such as Spain, Bulgaria and the United States. Therefore, I don't think the British version of English should be strictly adhered to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.77.106 ( talk) 02:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
My update was entirely neutral in viewpoint. Beck mentioned Bauer replacing someone in the White House. The obvious implication is Gregory Craig, White House Counsel, even if it isn't true. That's what Beck was implying. There have been rumors of his departure and Bauer happens to be the President's personal lawyer. White House Counsel is an obvious fit. 71.174.40.116 ( talk) 22:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Kman
Re Shroud of Turin. Yes. Its not going well. I just about died laughing at the comment tho. It does sound like he somehow video confferenced from the great beyond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollipopfop ( talk • contribs) 00:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Sorry, Im very new to Wiki, so I tend to make things worse. And the Shroud article is pretty messed up even by my standards. I do realize that suggesting a video conference from the great beyond isn't going to make it sound more encyclopedia like. I hope you removed that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollipopfop ( talk • contribs) 00:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I am lost and alone and looking for soup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.229 ( talk) 22:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
sorry i don't speek spanish —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.229 ( talk) 22:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The information on barry seal page is not accurrate.
I was going to source all this work I was doing as I was in the middle of working on the page.
Now all that work is lost. Why did you do this when i was in the middle of working on the page.
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.52.122.24 ( talk) 23:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Who has right to present Serbian Vlachs as Romanians?! They have their national name, culture, tradition - identity and they are recognized by the Serbian Constitution an Law as Vlachs (Vlasi). The other ethnic group in Serbia are Romanians. Iin Serbia everyone is free to declare whatever nationality it choose in census. SERBIA - Census 2002: Vlachs: 40.054; Romanians: 34.576. So, who gave right to itself to not respect these facts?! This is the act of basic rudeness! VLACHS ARE VLACHS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.114.197 ( talk) 23:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Contrary to assertions made above by user 91.150.114.197, the Serbian Constitution does not mention Vlachs. The Serbian Constitution only mentions Serbs by name, other ethnic groups simply being referred to as other citizens of the state of Serbia.
Regarding the term Vlach as found in popular usage, in the media, and in government censuses, it is true that in many peoples' minds there is a distinction between Vlachs and Romanians. However Vlach and its variants Wallach, Wallachian, etc are well-known medieval exonyms for Romanians (cf. the medieval Romanian state of Wallachia or Vlachia). Moreover the Vlachs of Serbia, in their own speech, which consists of dialects of Romanian, call themselves Romanian. There is also ample evidence, mentioned in the Wiki article, of a substantial Vlach origin from the adjacent territory of modern Romania. Nevertheless it is also true that most Vlachs of Serbia today do not self-identify with the modern Romanian people or state. This is partly a result of the complete lack of education on Vlach origin, history, language and culture in Serbian schools. There also is no media (papers, TV, radio, etc) or religious services in Vlach, except for one single tiny church in the village of Malajnica near Negotin, under Father Bojan Aleksandrovic, which is under constant political and religious pressure to close down. Because of longstanding assimilationist pressure, only some 16% of the Vlachs of Serbia declared themselves as such in the last census, in 2002. The true number of Vlachs of Serbia is estimated at 250 000. C0gnate ( talk) 17:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
HEY WASSAP MAN —Preceding unsigned comment added by B3zocdeq8n ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
This is not vandalism at all. If you still think so, please give me encyclopedic sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.100.179 ( talk) 23:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
The links are commercial. In fact, they are total garbage. Thanks for catching the wiktionary removal, though. [1] I removed the links. -- IP69.226.103.13 ( talk) 23:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism done to my talk page. Have a cookie! :) - Zhang He ( talk) 00:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey bro when I was updating This Romantic Tragedy's Wikipedia section, I thought that there was free right to edit a page. Not to mention I also did this as a joke. So please disregard my activity then. TriadSambo ( talk) 21:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. But the Battle of the Bands thing did exist and is a fact so if it's cool, I'm just gonna update it so it says that they did lose to Centaur Rodeo (which is my brother's band: http://www.myspace.com/centaurr0de0) TriadSambo ( talk) 21:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Oh ok. I didn't know you couldn't use Myspace as a reliable source. So what can I edit then? Am I even doing this right? Let me know. TriadSambo ( talk) 21:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the revert on my talk page. This was my first day using Huggle and wow! I felt like I was bailing out a sailboat with a thimble. Amazing. Take care (and try to avoid eye strain!), JohnnyB256 ( talk) 23:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Neighbours article. I leave the page for ten minutes and they, User talk:203.44.180.197, came back. I was just asking the person who placed the 'last warning' notice on the user's talk page what I should do next and you'd already took action. So, thank you (again) for that. :) JuneGloom07 ( talk) 01:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I have a problem with an user on Eiður Guðjohnsen, he insist the link should be added to an article as Eidur Gudjohnsen and not as Eiður Guðjohnsen. I explained him why it must be added in the original language but he insists that I'm wrong. Could you tell me if I'm wrong or if he's worng? Archibald Leitch ( talk) 01:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your fast answer. Archibald Leitch ( talk) 01:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Hans Adalbert Schweigart is wrong spelled, and a person is not an institution. I don't know, if it is spelled Hans-Adalbert Schweigart. -- Fmrauch ( talk) 23:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Are you able to undo what User:Sotochace did? I have blocked the user, but I am not familiar enough with the subject to restore what should be. Jeepday ( talk) 01:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
to be perfectly honest, i actually live in high brooms, so i think i should just give people a warning as to what it truly is - seeing as wikipedia is about giving factual information on a subject. thanks :) 90.215.18.207 ( talk) 22:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page :-)! StaticGull Talk 23:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Why do youkeep reverting?
What is the best place to keep that?
And why don't you read that it's NOT the test? And you let me to put in sand box, Sand box is deleted every 12 hours but the mission is keep running until the end of November.-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I have an account already. But I just not log in today because I'm not using the main computer right now.-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
But this computer is owned by my dad. And if I log in my dad can hack me. (and my dad likes to know everything!)-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
What is IE/FF?-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
IE - Internet Explorer; FF = Firefox. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Safety first. If once there is no diaglog box that means MY DAD COULD HACK ANYTIME!!-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I want to delete it until the answer comes-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
You are not even an administrator so stop claiming to be one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.215.166 ( talk) 00:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page! StaticGull Talk 23:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
you reverted my change, said it was unconstructive, and said I should provide an informative edit summary. My change was constructive, and I did provide an informative edit summary, you simply ignored it. Your lazyness is wasting other wikipedians time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.101.2 ( talk) 12:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Ford was NOTED for the sloppy buttsex he had with Reagan in '76. I leave the edit in. 128.122.88.205 ( talk) 00:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
i don't understand but i put the real Logo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo yaser ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
SERIOUSLY..U HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN EDIT WIKIPEDIA??? I HOPE YOUR GETTING PAID FOR THIS OR ELSE I WOULD SUGGEST ASKING FOR SOME COMPENSATION FOR THE TOTAL LOSS OF TIME YOU SPEND SCANNING THIS WEBSITE! GOODLUCK! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.205.55.58 ( talk) 01:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
I was impressed with your actions on a recent set of edits we partipated in. A review of your edit history, and comments are also impressive. I have seen your {{ User wikipedia/Administrator someday}} and would like to recomend you for admin. Do you think you are ready? JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I WILL TAKE OF WIKIPEDIA MUAHAHAHAHA AHHAHA AHA
I've removed the proposed deletion tag from this redirect, because redirects are not eligible for proposed deletion. Only actual articles and disambiguation pages are eligible. You might want to bring this to WP:RFD instead (I have a feeling it would be deleted). Just letting you know, thanks! -- Atama 頭 00:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Adding a lists or russians to this page is inappropriate. He was not a russian there was no Russia at the time. The link to the page with russian rulers is more than enough. Thank you. 63.240.123.12 ( talk) 23:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ron,
I see that you have recently updated and added quite a bit of information to the Max Mermelstein page as well as other key figures from this era (Barry Seal, Jon Roberts etc.) How did you learn about Max and where are you getting most of the infomation from for the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thabal ( talk • contribs) 04:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
... 'cos it's a lil' more than 48 hours to go. I am optimistic for your chances, and I wish for you that, to quote Tolkien, "what should be, shall be." With good humor, Jus da fax 22:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
I've closed your RFA as successful, as you know, and I would encourage you to keep the concerns of the opposition in your RFA as points of personal improvement for yourself, and to remain cautious when working in these areas for the moment. Show 'em you can be trusted! If you'd like to test your tools out, you can head to new admin school. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to let me or another admin know. Cheers, bibliomaniac 1 5 00:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congrats! The thing that should not be 23:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations as well! ConCompS (Talk to me) 00:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Well done! Crafty ( talk) 00:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! I never thought this would ever come when you had 33 percent support, but you really beat the odds and have become an administrator. Good luck! Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 00:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congrats Ron! It's a great day for you and Wikipedia... Good Fortunes, always! Jus da fax 00:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations. As you noted, don't feel compelled to quickly jump into anything. Make the easy blocks at AIV and watch the fruity cases to see how they play out. Please feel absolutely free to ask any questions! Kuru talk 03:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Wikipedia:Section , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. –
imis
☂
01:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to stop by and congratulate you on your adminship. Mkdw talk 03:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
With all those automated edits, I'm surprised you weren't sent over to WP:BAG for approval *joke*. Congratulations, and don't break the Wiki! davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! I stumbled on your RfA at the last minute and glad I had a chance to weigh in. -- JohnnyB256 ( talk) 15:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations, Ronhjones. I'm glad the automated edits didn't hold you back. ~ YellowFives 18:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Michael Craig-Martin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Dynamic IP. Nothing to do with me. Goodbye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.5.190.56 ( talk) 14:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not as busy as usual, so any reply might take a little longer - I've an eye infection, and can't focus too long on the screen Ronhjones (Talk) 00:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thanks for changing it to underconstruction, as well i saw you added a comment about that page that it was founded in 1953, but that was actually the date that the current "headquarters" or fraternity house was built. again thanks and i appreciate your input. Kevin Merchant ( talk) 00:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
WHOIS will show the location of the ISP . I will check that out in future, It might have been a coincidence but at the time it seemed to be worth mentioning, thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ron,
I am new to Wiki. Please help me by providing feedback to help me with getting my article published and approved.
Thanks Best Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by B2uproductions ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Re: the edit that you reverted with the comment "Reverted addition of dubious unsourced content". That actually wasn't random vandalism, at least not exactly. The source is the 23 November Pearls Before Swine strip, in which Rat vandalises Stephan's WP bio by inserting that false information. See Talk:Stephan Pastis#Info on high school and tattoos should be added. Just in case you were wondering WTF that was about. Thanks for reverting. -- Zsero ( talk) 07:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
What is wrong with Kyiv and Luhansk? This is a correct transliteration of Ukrainian into English... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.230.29.53 ( talk) 00:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for explanation. How can I change the page name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pashko 2 ( talk • contribs) 01:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
IMO there is a lot more copy vio than that, I suggest having a bit more of a look, if it is still there I will look some more tomorrow, similar written text all uncited...mmmm.? Off2riorob ( talk) 03:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ronhjones - I wonder if I could seek your input. The My Name is Khan article, about an upcoming film, is subject to frequent vandalism. Awhile ago, I put in a request here: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection but did not receive a response either in terms of accept or decline. This film has received a great deal of publicity for quite some time and so I think the article is worth some kind of semi-protection. I would appreciate your feedback on the topic. Regards, - Classicfilms ( talk) 17:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Should you see a lot of IP in the future then this is what you need to copy and paste into Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
==== {{la|My Name Is Khan}} ==== '''Semi-protect''' - high level of IP vandals to this page ~~~~
- just after the {{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
line
I'll do a week's protection for now, and see how it goes - often vandals will find some other page to play with and don't come back.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
17:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your comment on the Stedman Pearson article the other day, to use Whois for location identification, I had a look one two three four and these four ip look to me to be totally identical, would you please comment regarding that..as I am quite new in looking at these Whois reports would you please comment as to what are the clearest identifiers in the report and what specifically is conclusive, if and when you have time, no worries..no pressure. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
For this bit of tidying up. Maybe I'll be able to return the favor some day :) See ya 'round Tide rolls 01:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
|
The Userpage Shield | |
I, Eagles247, hereby award Ronhjones this Userpage Shield Barnstar for reverting vandalism by an anti-Semetic bastard on my user page. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC) |
Hi,
Thanks for cleaning up my (brand new to Wiki) attempt at putting in a reference and link to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_2018_and_2022_FIFA_World_Cup_bid
The reference I wished to add is http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/world-cup-bid-needs-reality-cheque/story-e6frfifo-1225809729751 but I can't get my head around the Wiki editing instructions on references. Be grateful for some help.
The link which apparently was not allowed is http://barklystend.blogspot.com/2009/12/australian-government-supports-foreign.html I'm not sure why - as it is relevant to the issue? Again I'd be grateful for some advice.
Yours,
pH1979 —Preceding unsigned comment added by PH1979 ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello , Im Really Sorry About Mistakes That Happened in this Article ,That Was My First One ,I Wonder if you can edit it yourself and write the needed contexts
this is the link for it http://www.jafi.org.il/education/anthology/english/print/E5B-michtav_learavi.pdf
I Think its going to help many people and explain them Great Scientist And Philosopher "Albert Enstien" Point of view about Arab - Israeli Conflicts and the ways to solve it
Accept My Best Regards
Faisal Saeed Al Mutar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faisoly ( talk • contribs) 02:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
MWOAP ( talk) 01:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones. :) I notice that you removed the CSD tag from the ACUA article after removing some of the content. However, the article still contained two large paragraphs of text that were blatant copyright violations. Please be more careful in the future when you compare the article to the source. Thanks, The leftorium 19:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. The Copyvio on Government College of Technology, Karachi was a compound one with additional material copied from http://www.gctkarachi.com/html/mainlinks/History.htm so the removal of the first section isn't sufficient. Regards. -- Whpq ( talk) 00:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hola, thanks for fixing my edit notice request. Just to make sure, I may have found a mistake at Wikipedia:EDN. It says under the instructions for requesting an editnotice to be made:
Another way to find the link for an editnotice is to:
[[{{editnotice pagename}}]]
By following those instructions, the page would end up at Template:Editnotice FarmVille as I did, rather than Template:Editnotices/Page/FarmVille, correct? Thanks, ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 01:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
[[{{editnotice talkpagename))]]
on the main (FarmVille) page - just preview will do, then you get the correct link (
Template talk:Editnotices/Page/FarmVille - which is where I had to move your page to. Then I copy the template part to the "template" page. And then protect the template. Whewww... Still it seems to work!!
Ronhjones
(Talk)
01:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Heh, biology is certainly a big jump from learning about rocks in middle school. Anyways, Template talk:Editnotice FarmVille should probably be deleted know that it's been moved. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 01:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Maryum Jameelah , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryum Jameelah (3rd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 ( talk) 18:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Abecedare ( talk) 19:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Take a look at Category:Years of the 19th century in India, a whole bunch of pages should be deleted because the same reason as 2009 in Afghanistan, lack of context. Qajar ( talk) 05:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
'Ave a go, please, seriously can't work it out.
Feel free to delete SB3 if it doesn't work out as I wont need it and only created it for this. Cheers, Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 22:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Gave up on the 3 nested templates idea - it wasn't going to work without a lot of head scratching. I think the problem was trying to use data1|data2|data3 in a field, the "|" means different things inside braces! Then I remembered I made a template without all the nested options {{ Infobox aqueduct navigable}}, so I've used that as a basis - much easier to work with. You'll see an example of its output at User:Jeffrey Mall/SB. It's saved at {{ Infobox FourColumns}}. I've made it general purpose, so that it could be used in other articles - so all the text (including headers) is added on the article page, also allows for one picture (if required) and an "extra" box - full width at bottom. Let me know what you think. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
I present Ronhjones with this barnstar for his hard work and determination to aid me in coding one nightmare of a filmography template. Thank you, Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 01:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
Thank you for beating me to reverting vandalism on my own talk page! fetch comms ☛ 22:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks for all your work in Recent Changes... you even rollback everything before I get there :p IShadowed ✰ 23:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
I would like to get the page for "Sutter Middle School vs. Folsom Middle School" back. It would mean a great deal to the citizens of Folsom, CA and the debate has been a known event in the community for some time now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fathertime767 ( talk • contribs) 23:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I would appreciate a copy of it so that I can edit as needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fathertime767 ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
i am verry sorry i am actally disabled and mum says that i can edit wickypedia becos she is busy with a man in her room! until i am fed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.176.126 ( talk) 22:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones - Sorry to bother you with this again, but I wonder if you could keep My Name Is Khan on your watchlist? The week long protection has expired and non-rs links to videos and so forth are being added. I don't think enough time has passed to post a request for full protection yet but at the same time, it would help if a few more people could watch the page in the meantime. I have reverted this once today and once before on a different day but do not wish to get into an edit war over the issue. Thanks, - Classicfilms ( talk) 22:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Ron, I was going to remove my warning to magicman77, and I noticed you had already done so. Thanks for cleaning up my mess. Bradjamesbrown ( talk) 01:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
re what appeared to be a deleted item seems to be srpinging up again - cheers Satu Suro 02:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
The article is such a mess that I think it might be an idea to suggest the article is moved to his user page until it is sorted out? Teapot george Talk 22:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
See? If I didn't edit that article, you wouldn't have improved it with more information! Maybe you should thank me next time rather than just send me snarky messages. You could say "thanks for vandalising that! I found it hilarious! But, I've edited it now to make it more informative!!" But no. I won't get that from you at all. This makes me sad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.197.173 ( talk) 00:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi, you sent me a message about an edit I made to a psychochemical weapons page. The only problem here is that I didn't make any edits to any psychochemical weapons pages. 131.212.202.74 ( talk) 17:00, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Ah, wait, nevermind. I remember that edit now. I had no idea wikipedia made pages tracking this stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.212.202.74 ( talk) 17:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
For your concern about the current political climate in Garfield Hts. It seems that Ron Finerty, (aka Bobblehead or Ronf57) chooses to edit this article with his opinions of the current incumbant Mayor and certain Council members. It should be noted that Wagner promised Finertys' wife the position of economic development director on the off chance he gets elected. Its as if the people of Garfield Hts dont know dirty tricks when they see them. Keep an eye on Finertys comments as they get more laughable. Custom500 ( talk) 21:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Spermophagia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spermophagia. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies ( talk) 17:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I apologize... I didn't realize that it would be considered unconstructive... thanks for the heads up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.248.36 ( talk) 17:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
at the article "vigilante"
i changed the following "unlawful" into unjust (as shown with the >> and << characters below)
"A vigilante is someone who unlawfully punishes a criminal, or participates in a mob or conspiracy to mete out >>unlawful<< punishment to a criminal or criminals."
this is because vigilantes act on what they think is unjust, not necessarily on what the government thinks is unjust.
but this change was reverted by you, i'd like an explanation please 85.144.133.46 ( talk) 22:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
The recent message you left me regarding my edit to the page Taxpayer March on Washington appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the message was constructive, please ensure that you review the Life magazine "slideshow" before intervening. You may also wish to read the rulebook on External Links. Thank you. Kenatipo ( talk) 17:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Bah! I didn't revert right on the Chevy page, thanks for fixing it =) SparksBoy (Huggle) ( talk) 21:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted edits that User:Locutus0fLegi0n made to my pages. First of all, thank you.
I've had problems with them before, and they seem to hate me for no reason. They know full well what they are doing, and won't stop unless they're perma-banned.
I need to get them perma-banned, however I don't know how to go about that. They've been after me, off and on, for the past few weeks -- I had been impersonated on YouTube, my life has been mocked, and yet you see these messages and think nothing of it?
"We have your dox." They claim to have my information, but...
They need to stop, but I don't know the proper channels to go through. Daniel Benfield ( talk) 22:31, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
19:10.54 ClueBot-2: Possible vandalism: Tank changed by Jollybro replacing entire content with something else on (N/A). 19:10.54 ClueBot-3: ( http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Tank&action=history | http://en.wikipedia.org/?diff=319715299&oldid=319715114 ) 19:10.54 ClueBot-5: Reverting ... 19:10.55 ClueBot-2: Grr! Beaten by Ronhjones.
ClueBot: 0 - You: 1
Anyways I just saw that in the IRC and wanted to say congrats. :) -- Sidonuke ( talk :: contribs) 23:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for my revision of Scooby-Doo, was just trying to remove rather a lot of vandalism (picures of genitallia, words changed to penis etc) by some random. Apparently Marek69 had the same idea, but noticed some things I didn't (so reverted it further).
Just thought I'd let ya know Alphathon
Hi. Sorry to leave two messages, but I'm a little tired atm so forgot to put my sig and a title in the prev message (which I have quoted below).
"Sorry for my revision of Scooby-Doo, was just trying to remove rather a lot of vandalism (picures of genitallia, words changed to penis etc) by some random. Apparently Marek69 had the same idea, but noticed some things I didn't (so reverted it further).
Just thought I'd let ya know"
Sorry again Alphathon ( talk) 00:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, Ronhjones, for watching out for my userpage. It's been continually vandalized by the same individual for the past few days. I very much appreciate your vigilance! Basket of Puppies 22:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ron.
I had added the Diamond Chess page in good faith as something that might be of interest. Other chess variants appeared, such as hexagonal chess. I received notice from the moderators that Wikipedia is "not a gaming site" and that it should be deleted.
I thought this a bit inconsistent since numerous other games appear, but to comply, I removed the offending article.
Now, I am getting warnings and final warnings for having taken it down.
I am not really sure what I should do at this point. If you folks want it up, I will put it up. If you want it down, I will take it down. If you want it modified in some way, and then put up, I am happy to do that as well.
Please advise as to what I need to do, and remove the warnings from my ID.
My intent was (and still is) to share, never to offend.
Thanks,
Jim Guyer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimguyer ( talk • contribs) 15:52, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
How can I be an Admin 666isactuallyaholynumber ( talk) 22:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
This looks like a content dispute to me, rather than vandalism. See User_talk:Rrburke#ACT_Debating_Union_Entry. Cheers. 22:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, again. I'm interested in knowing more about the "why's" and the "how's" of the reversions of my addition of wording to the Life slideshow External Link. EL guidelines, I think, suggest that links with a POV should be so noted by adding a comment. EL guidelines do not require that ELs be footnoted (I looked at dozens of ELs in many articles - not a single footnote). My opinion is that anyone who compared the Time and the Life photo-essays/slideshows would conclude that one was neutral and one had a clear POV. I wasn't violating any policy by Being Bold - just the opposite. Now, the words I chose to add may have been too bold for some, but that's no reason for reverting the whole thing -- just tone them down a little. Requiring that the whole issue be discussed on the talk page is like requiring group consensus on whether 2 + 2 really equals 4. My adding a comment to an EL is not vandalism. Which brings me to my question: why does Huggle classify my revert of APK's revert as "vandalism"? thanks. Kenatipo ( talk) 17:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ron,
Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Could you go ahead and remove reference to Diamond Chess from chess variants for now?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_variant
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimguyer ( talk • contribs) 20:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate that...maybe I can repay the favor sometime. :)
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕))
23:53, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
I will ask you to please talk to me prior to making any changes. Have the respect that I am working on a page. I would dearly appreciate it. Thank you! By the way there are Thousands of pages on Wiki that need to be worked on, that have been ignored for quite some time. Please appreciate those that are working towards completion. Thanks again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modelmanager ( talk • contribs) 22:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
The AFD template is unwarranted and not valid my page was confirmed yesterday! Too many editors on here, go purge the thousands of wiki pages that need mass edits that no one is working on. Please, I am trying my best here. Work with me!!! Modelmanager ( talk) 22:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Modelmanager
Thank you for looking out for my userpage! Dac04 ( talk) 23:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I get tried of editors like you did you even bother reading my edit summary did you look at the edit history or the talk page to see the background of Haberstr edits or the fact he reverted any edits done in the past few months to the last time he tried to push his version? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.38.135 ( talk) 23:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I think he was trying to blank the page, so I've replaced it with SD-blank. HalfShadow ( talk) 22:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Who r u
Don't make me call admin
U my postings NO —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceo7 ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page so quickly Barret ( talk) 22:53, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
DINT DO NUFFIN M8 Y U HAVIN A GO? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.16.159 ( talk) 00:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Chelsea Football Club is not a subject entirely related to Britain. They have a global fanbase and play football throughout the world in places such as Spain, Bulgaria and the United States. Therefore, I don't think the British version of English should be strictly adhered to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.77.106 ( talk) 02:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
My update was entirely neutral in viewpoint. Beck mentioned Bauer replacing someone in the White House. The obvious implication is Gregory Craig, White House Counsel, even if it isn't true. That's what Beck was implying. There have been rumors of his departure and Bauer happens to be the President's personal lawyer. White House Counsel is an obvious fit. 71.174.40.116 ( talk) 22:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Kman
Re Shroud of Turin. Yes. Its not going well. I just about died laughing at the comment tho. It does sound like he somehow video confferenced from the great beyond. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollipopfop ( talk • contribs) 00:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC) Sorry, Im very new to Wiki, so I tend to make things worse. And the Shroud article is pretty messed up even by my standards. I do realize that suggesting a video conference from the great beyond isn't going to make it sound more encyclopedia like. I hope you removed that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollipopfop ( talk • contribs) 00:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
I am lost and alone and looking for soup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.229 ( talk) 22:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
sorry i don't speek spanish —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.229 ( talk) 22:24, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
The information on barry seal page is not accurrate.
I was going to source all this work I was doing as I was in the middle of working on the page.
Now all that work is lost. Why did you do this when i was in the middle of working on the page.
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.52.122.24 ( talk) 23:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Who has right to present Serbian Vlachs as Romanians?! They have their national name, culture, tradition - identity and they are recognized by the Serbian Constitution an Law as Vlachs (Vlasi). The other ethnic group in Serbia are Romanians. Iin Serbia everyone is free to declare whatever nationality it choose in census. SERBIA - Census 2002: Vlachs: 40.054; Romanians: 34.576. So, who gave right to itself to not respect these facts?! This is the act of basic rudeness! VLACHS ARE VLACHS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.114.197 ( talk) 23:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Contrary to assertions made above by user 91.150.114.197, the Serbian Constitution does not mention Vlachs. The Serbian Constitution only mentions Serbs by name, other ethnic groups simply being referred to as other citizens of the state of Serbia.
Regarding the term Vlach as found in popular usage, in the media, and in government censuses, it is true that in many peoples' minds there is a distinction between Vlachs and Romanians. However Vlach and its variants Wallach, Wallachian, etc are well-known medieval exonyms for Romanians (cf. the medieval Romanian state of Wallachia or Vlachia). Moreover the Vlachs of Serbia, in their own speech, which consists of dialects of Romanian, call themselves Romanian. There is also ample evidence, mentioned in the Wiki article, of a substantial Vlach origin from the adjacent territory of modern Romania. Nevertheless it is also true that most Vlachs of Serbia today do not self-identify with the modern Romanian people or state. This is partly a result of the complete lack of education on Vlach origin, history, language and culture in Serbian schools. There also is no media (papers, TV, radio, etc) or religious services in Vlach, except for one single tiny church in the village of Malajnica near Negotin, under Father Bojan Aleksandrovic, which is under constant political and religious pressure to close down. Because of longstanding assimilationist pressure, only some 16% of the Vlachs of Serbia declared themselves as such in the last census, in 2002. The true number of Vlachs of Serbia is estimated at 250 000. C0gnate ( talk) 17:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
HEY WASSAP MAN —Preceding unsigned comment added by B3zocdeq8n ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
This is not vandalism at all. If you still think so, please give me encyclopedic sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.100.179 ( talk) 23:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
The links are commercial. In fact, they are total garbage. Thanks for catching the wiktionary removal, though. [1] I removed the links. -- IP69.226.103.13 ( talk) 23:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism done to my talk page. Have a cookie! :) - Zhang He ( talk) 00:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey bro when I was updating This Romantic Tragedy's Wikipedia section, I thought that there was free right to edit a page. Not to mention I also did this as a joke. So please disregard my activity then. TriadSambo ( talk) 21:47, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. But the Battle of the Bands thing did exist and is a fact so if it's cool, I'm just gonna update it so it says that they did lose to Centaur Rodeo (which is my brother's band: http://www.myspace.com/centaurr0de0) TriadSambo ( talk) 21:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Oh ok. I didn't know you couldn't use Myspace as a reliable source. So what can I edit then? Am I even doing this right? Let me know. TriadSambo ( talk) 21:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the revert on my talk page. This was my first day using Huggle and wow! I felt like I was bailing out a sailboat with a thimble. Amazing. Take care (and try to avoid eye strain!), JohnnyB256 ( talk) 23:21, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Neighbours article. I leave the page for ten minutes and they, User talk:203.44.180.197, came back. I was just asking the person who placed the 'last warning' notice on the user's talk page what I should do next and you'd already took action. So, thank you (again) for that. :) JuneGloom07 ( talk) 01:27, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
I have a problem with an user on Eiður Guðjohnsen, he insist the link should be added to an article as Eidur Gudjohnsen and not as Eiður Guðjohnsen. I explained him why it must be added in the original language but he insists that I'm wrong. Could you tell me if I'm wrong or if he's worng? Archibald Leitch ( talk) 01:34, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your fast answer. Archibald Leitch ( talk) 01:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Hans Adalbert Schweigart is wrong spelled, and a person is not an institution. I don't know, if it is spelled Hans-Adalbert Schweigart. -- Fmrauch ( talk) 23:15, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Are you able to undo what User:Sotochace did? I have blocked the user, but I am not familiar enough with the subject to restore what should be. Jeepday ( talk) 01:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
to be perfectly honest, i actually live in high brooms, so i think i should just give people a warning as to what it truly is - seeing as wikipedia is about giving factual information on a subject. thanks :) 90.215.18.207 ( talk) 22:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page :-)! StaticGull Talk 23:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Why do youkeep reverting?
What is the best place to keep that?
And why don't you read that it's NOT the test? And you let me to put in sand box, Sand box is deleted every 12 hours but the mission is keep running until the end of November.-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I have an account already. But I just not log in today because I'm not using the main computer right now.-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
But this computer is owned by my dad. And if I log in my dad can hack me. (and my dad likes to know everything!)-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
What is IE/FF?-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
IE - Internet Explorer; FF = Firefox. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Safety first. If once there is no diaglog box that means MY DAD COULD HACK ANYTIME!!-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I want to delete it until the answer comes-- 125.25.81.65 ( talk) 23:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
You are not even an administrator so stop claiming to be one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.163.215.166 ( talk) 00:12, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page! StaticGull Talk 23:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
you reverted my change, said it was unconstructive, and said I should provide an informative edit summary. My change was constructive, and I did provide an informative edit summary, you simply ignored it. Your lazyness is wasting other wikipedians time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.101.2 ( talk) 12:57, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Ford was NOTED for the sloppy buttsex he had with Reagan in '76. I leave the edit in. 128.122.88.205 ( talk) 00:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
i don't understand but i put the real Logo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bo yaser ( talk • contribs) 00:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
SERIOUSLY..U HAVE NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN EDIT WIKIPEDIA??? I HOPE YOUR GETTING PAID FOR THIS OR ELSE I WOULD SUGGEST ASKING FOR SOME COMPENSATION FOR THE TOTAL LOSS OF TIME YOU SPEND SCANNING THIS WEBSITE! GOODLUCK! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.205.55.58 ( talk) 01:00, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
I was impressed with your actions on a recent set of edits we partipated in. A review of your edit history, and comments are also impressive. I have seen your {{ User wikipedia/Administrator someday}} and would like to recomend you for admin. Do you think you are ready? JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
I WILL TAKE OF WIKIPEDIA MUAHAHAHAHA AHHAHA AHA
I've removed the proposed deletion tag from this redirect, because redirects are not eligible for proposed deletion. Only actual articles and disambiguation pages are eligible. You might want to bring this to WP:RFD instead (I have a feeling it would be deleted). Just letting you know, thanks! -- Atama 頭 00:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Adding a lists or russians to this page is inappropriate. He was not a russian there was no Russia at the time. The link to the page with russian rulers is more than enough. Thank you. 63.240.123.12 ( talk) 23:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ron,
I see that you have recently updated and added quite a bit of information to the Max Mermelstein page as well as other key figures from this era (Barry Seal, Jon Roberts etc.) How did you learn about Max and where are you getting most of the infomation from for the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thabal ( talk • contribs) 04:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
... 'cos it's a lil' more than 48 hours to go. I am optimistic for your chances, and I wish for you that, to quote Tolkien, "what should be, shall be." With good humor, Jus da fax 22:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
I've closed your RFA as successful, as you know, and I would encourage you to keep the concerns of the opposition in your RFA as points of personal improvement for yourself, and to remain cautious when working in these areas for the moment. Show 'em you can be trusted! If you'd like to test your tools out, you can head to new admin school. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to let me or another admin know. Cheers, bibliomaniac 1 5 00:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congrats! The thing that should not be 23:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations as well! ConCompS (Talk to me) 00:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Well done! Crafty ( talk) 00:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! I never thought this would ever come when you had 33 percent support, but you really beat the odds and have become an administrator. Good luck! Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 00:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congrats Ron! It's a great day for you and Wikipedia... Good Fortunes, always! Jus da fax 00:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations. As you noted, don't feel compelled to quickly jump into anything. Make the easy blocks at AIV and watch the fruity cases to see how they play out. Please feel absolutely free to ask any questions! Kuru talk 03:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Wikipedia:Section , has been proposed for a
merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going
here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. –
imis
☂
01:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to stop by and congratulate you on your adminship. Mkdw talk 03:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
With all those automated edits, I'm surprised you weren't sent over to WP:BAG for approval *joke*. Congratulations, and don't break the Wiki! davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations! I stumbled on your RfA at the last minute and glad I had a chance to weigh in. -- JohnnyB256 ( talk) 15:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations, Ronhjones. I'm glad the automated edits didn't hold you back. ~ YellowFives 18:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Michael Craig-Martin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Dynamic IP. Nothing to do with me. Goodbye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.5.190.56 ( talk) 14:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not as busy as usual, so any reply might take a little longer - I've an eye infection, and can't focus too long on the screen Ronhjones (Talk) 00:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thanks for changing it to underconstruction, as well i saw you added a comment about that page that it was founded in 1953, but that was actually the date that the current "headquarters" or fraternity house was built. again thanks and i appreciate your input. Kevin Merchant ( talk) 00:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
WHOIS will show the location of the ISP . I will check that out in future, It might have been a coincidence but at the time it seemed to be worth mentioning, thanks. Off2riorob ( talk) 23:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ron,
I am new to Wiki. Please help me by providing feedback to help me with getting my article published and approved.
Thanks Best Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by B2uproductions ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Re: the edit that you reverted with the comment "Reverted addition of dubious unsourced content". That actually wasn't random vandalism, at least not exactly. The source is the 23 November Pearls Before Swine strip, in which Rat vandalises Stephan's WP bio by inserting that false information. See Talk:Stephan Pastis#Info on high school and tattoos should be added. Just in case you were wondering WTF that was about. Thanks for reverting. -- Zsero ( talk) 07:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
What is wrong with Kyiv and Luhansk? This is a correct transliteration of Ukrainian into English... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.230.29.53 ( talk) 00:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for explanation. How can I change the page name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pashko 2 ( talk • contribs) 01:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
IMO there is a lot more copy vio than that, I suggest having a bit more of a look, if it is still there I will look some more tomorrow, similar written text all uncited...mmmm.? Off2riorob ( talk) 03:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ronhjones - I wonder if I could seek your input. The My Name is Khan article, about an upcoming film, is subject to frequent vandalism. Awhile ago, I put in a request here: Wikipedia:Requests for page protection but did not receive a response either in terms of accept or decline. This film has received a great deal of publicity for quite some time and so I think the article is worth some kind of semi-protection. I would appreciate your feedback on the topic. Regards, - Classicfilms ( talk) 17:13, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Should you see a lot of IP in the future then this is what you need to copy and paste into Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
==== {{la|My Name Is Khan}} ==== '''Semi-protect''' - high level of IP vandals to this page ~~~~
- just after the {{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
line
I'll do a week's protection for now, and see how it goes - often vandals will find some other page to play with and don't come back.
Ronhjones
(Talk)
17:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your comment on the Stedman Pearson article the other day, to use Whois for location identification, I had a look one two three four and these four ip look to me to be totally identical, would you please comment regarding that..as I am quite new in looking at these Whois reports would you please comment as to what are the clearest identifiers in the report and what specifically is conclusive, if and when you have time, no worries..no pressure. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
For this bit of tidying up. Maybe I'll be able to return the favor some day :) See ya 'round Tide rolls 01:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
|
The Userpage Shield | |
I, Eagles247, hereby award Ronhjones this Userpage Shield Barnstar for reverting vandalism by an anti-Semetic bastard on my user page. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC) |
Hi,
Thanks for cleaning up my (brand new to Wiki) attempt at putting in a reference and link to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_2018_and_2022_FIFA_World_Cup_bid
The reference I wished to add is http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/world-cup-bid-needs-reality-cheque/story-e6frfifo-1225809729751 but I can't get my head around the Wiki editing instructions on references. Be grateful for some help.
The link which apparently was not allowed is http://barklystend.blogspot.com/2009/12/australian-government-supports-foreign.html I'm not sure why - as it is relevant to the issue? Again I'd be grateful for some advice.
Yours,
pH1979 —Preceding unsigned comment added by PH1979 ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello , Im Really Sorry About Mistakes That Happened in this Article ,That Was My First One ,I Wonder if you can edit it yourself and write the needed contexts
this is the link for it http://www.jafi.org.il/education/anthology/english/print/E5B-michtav_learavi.pdf
I Think its going to help many people and explain them Great Scientist And Philosopher "Albert Enstien" Point of view about Arab - Israeli Conflicts and the ways to solve it
Accept My Best Regards
Faisal Saeed Al Mutar —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faisoly ( talk • contribs) 02:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
MWOAP ( talk) 01:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones. :) I notice that you removed the CSD tag from the ACUA article after removing some of the content. However, the article still contained two large paragraphs of text that were blatant copyright violations. Please be more careful in the future when you compare the article to the source. Thanks, The leftorium 19:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi. The Copyvio on Government College of Technology, Karachi was a compound one with additional material copied from http://www.gctkarachi.com/html/mainlinks/History.htm so the removal of the first section isn't sufficient. Regards. -- Whpq ( talk) 00:03, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hola, thanks for fixing my edit notice request. Just to make sure, I may have found a mistake at Wikipedia:EDN. It says under the instructions for requesting an editnotice to be made:
Another way to find the link for an editnotice is to:
[[{{editnotice pagename}}]]
By following those instructions, the page would end up at Template:Editnotice FarmVille as I did, rather than Template:Editnotices/Page/FarmVille, correct? Thanks, ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 01:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
[[{{editnotice talkpagename))]]
on the main (FarmVille) page - just preview will do, then you get the correct link (
Template talk:Editnotices/Page/FarmVille - which is where I had to move your page to. Then I copy the template part to the "template" page. And then protect the template. Whewww... Still it seems to work!!
Ronhjones
(Talk)
01:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Heh, biology is certainly a big jump from learning about rocks in middle school. Anyways, Template talk:Editnotice FarmVille should probably be deleted know that it's been moved. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 01:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Maryum Jameelah , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryum Jameelah (3rd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 ( talk) 18:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Abecedare ( talk) 19:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Take a look at Category:Years of the 19th century in India, a whole bunch of pages should be deleted because the same reason as 2009 in Afghanistan, lack of context. Qajar ( talk) 05:49, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
'Ave a go, please, seriously can't work it out.
Feel free to delete SB3 if it doesn't work out as I wont need it and only created it for this. Cheers, Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 22:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Gave up on the 3 nested templates idea - it wasn't going to work without a lot of head scratching. I think the problem was trying to use data1|data2|data3 in a field, the "|" means different things inside braces! Then I remembered I made a template without all the nested options {{ Infobox aqueduct navigable}}, so I've used that as a basis - much easier to work with. You'll see an example of its output at User:Jeffrey Mall/SB. It's saved at {{ Infobox FourColumns}}. I've made it general purpose, so that it could be used in other articles - so all the text (including headers) is added on the article page, also allows for one picture (if required) and an "extra" box - full width at bottom. Let me know what you think. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:05, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
I present Ronhjones with this barnstar for his hard work and determination to aid me in coding one nightmare of a filmography template. Thank you, Jeffrey Mall ( talk • contribs) - 01:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC) |
Thank you for beating me to reverting vandalism on my own talk page! fetch comms ☛ 22:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thanks for all your work in Recent Changes... you even rollback everything before I get there :p IShadowed ✰ 23:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC) |
I would like to get the page for "Sutter Middle School vs. Folsom Middle School" back. It would mean a great deal to the citizens of Folsom, CA and the debate has been a known event in the community for some time now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fathertime767 ( talk • contribs) 23:58, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
I would appreciate a copy of it so that I can edit as needed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fathertime767 ( talk • contribs) 00:08, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
i am verry sorry i am actally disabled and mum says that i can edit wickypedia becos she is busy with a man in her room! until i am fed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.176.126 ( talk) 22:24, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ronhjones - Sorry to bother you with this again, but I wonder if you could keep My Name Is Khan on your watchlist? The week long protection has expired and non-rs links to videos and so forth are being added. I don't think enough time has passed to post a request for full protection yet but at the same time, it would help if a few more people could watch the page in the meantime. I have reverted this once today and once before on a different day but do not wish to get into an edit war over the issue. Thanks, - Classicfilms ( talk) 22:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Ron, I was going to remove my warning to magicman77, and I noticed you had already done so. Thanks for cleaning up my mess. Bradjamesbrown ( talk) 01:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
re what appeared to be a deleted item seems to be srpinging up again - cheers Satu Suro 02:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
The article is such a mess that I think it might be an idea to suggest the article is moved to his user page until it is sorted out? Teapot george Talk 22:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
See? If I didn't edit that article, you wouldn't have improved it with more information! Maybe you should thank me next time rather than just send me snarky messages. You could say "thanks for vandalising that! I found it hilarious! But, I've edited it now to make it more informative!!" But no. I won't get that from you at all. This makes me sad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.197.173 ( talk) 00:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)